Impact of coronary artery calcification in percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stents: Two-year clinical outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients from the ARRIVE program

Impact of stentablation with rotational atherectomy in coronary microcirculatory function

Key Clinical Message

Stentablation (SA) has been used as a bailout method for undilated, under-expanded stents, but one reason that SA is associated with a high rate of major adverse cardiac events may be its adverse effect on microcirculation. Consequently, appropriate lesion preparation should always be considered for heavily calcified lesions to avoid such complications.

Abstract

Under-expansion of the coronary stent is associated with increased rates of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis. Stentablation (SA) with rotational atherectomy is used in the treatment of undilatable, under-expanded coronary stents; however, its effect on coronary microcirculatory function remains unclear. This novel report compares microcirculation indices before and after SA.

Clinical outcomes of single- versus two-stent PCI technique in severely calcified true bifurcation lesions after rotational atherectomy

BACKGROUND

Severely calcified coronary bifurcations complicate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and often necessitate dedicated lesion preparation. We compared the outcomes of single- versus two-stent techniques for treating heavily calcified true bifurcation lesions following rotational atherectomy (RA).

METHODS

Among patients receiving RA for severely calcified true bifurcations at a single center, 59 were treated with a single stent, and another 59 received two stents. We analyzed in-hospital adverse outcomes and 1-year rates of the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE), defined as cardiac death, target bifurcation myocardial infarction (TB-MI), or target bifurcation revascularization (TBR).

RESULTS

The single-stent arm was associated with more in-hospital adverse outcomes (adj. OR, 6.13; 95% CI, 1.34-28.0; p = 0.019), driven by higher peri-procedural MI rates (18.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.043) and more side branch compromise (13.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.006). After 1 year, both techniques had comparable 1-year BOCE (adj. HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.12-1.23; p = 0.106). We observed a significant interaction between the treatment technique and the presence of LM bifurcation (p interaction = 0.012), favoring single-stent technique in patients with non-LM bifurcations (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.68; p = 0.015). Notably, the single-stent technique had lower rates of TBR (2% vs. 15%, p log-rank = 0.026) after 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severely calcified true bifurcation lesions, treated with RA followed by a single stent implantation, had more in-hospital adverse outcomes compared to those treated with two stents. However, the superior outcomes of the two-stent technique did not translate into improved long-term results. In fact, the two-stent technique was even associated with higher rates of revascularization after 1 year.

Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification

BACKGROUND

Calcified lesions are one of the most challenging cases for PCI, where optimal angiographic results and satisfying outcomes are hard to achieve.

METHODS

We evaluated the baseline clinical, procedures characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) who underwent coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and rotational atherectomy (RA).

RESULTS

Respectively 152 and 238 patients who underwent IVL and RA are enrolled from January 2023 to November 2023. Regarding demographic characteristics, the gender proportion, medical history of PCI and smoke history among groups reach statistical significance. Left anterior descending and right coronary artery were the main vessels treated in both groups. The 2.5 and 3.0 mm IVL balloons and 1.5 mm burr were the most commonly used. 99.3% cases were successfully implanted drug-eluting stents after IVL balloon pre-treatment, which was higher than in the group treated with RA. During hospitalization, there were no serious adverse events in the IVL group, but there were two adverse events in the RA group. Procedural complications were higher in the RA group than the IVL group (5.5% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

IVL appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of severe CAC lesions compared to RA.

Dichotomous grouping of peripheral arterial calcification grades: A practical predictor of outcome after endovascular therapy in peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

There is a general agreement that arterial calcification affects the results of endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In addition to lacking evidence for their impact, existing calcification scores are complex, and not practical in everyday decision making. The global limb anatomic staging system (GLASS) adopted dichotomous grouping of calcification grades.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aim to investigate the impact of peripheral arterial calcification scoring after dichotomous grouping on midterm outcomes following endovascular therapy for PAD.

METHODS

This prospective study included all consecutive patients with PAD indicated for endovascular therapy procedure who presented to our tertiary referral center in the period between October 2020 and October 2021. Patients were grouped into Group A (n = 40): with no-to mild calcification (PACSS grade 0,1 and 2), and Group B (n = 53): with severe calcification (PACSS grades 3 and 4). Primary endpoints included technical success rate, primary patency rates, and major adverse limb events rate (MALE) during 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age of the studied cases (n = 93) was 59.31 ± 6.46 years (range 50-75). 70 patients (75.3%) were males, and 23 (24.7%) were females. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding technical success rate (97.5% in group A versus 94.33% in Group B, p = .457). The Primary patency rate after 1 year was lower in group B (74%) compared to group A (89.7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = .059). However, the 2-year primary patency rate was significantly lower in group B compared to group A (64% versus 84.6% respectively, p = .034). MALE rate after 2 years was significantly higher in group B (28%) as compared to group A (10.4%), P = .048. Studying suspected risk factors revealed that severe calcification was more common in patients with ischemic heart disease (34%) and chronic kidney disease (11%), P= .003 and .002 respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients suffered from IHD and those with length of lesion ≥ 5 cm are about five times more likely to have severe calcification compared to their counterparts (OR = 4.875, 95%CI = 1.293-18.383, p = .019, and OR = 4.513, 95% CI = 11.138-17.893, p = .032), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The presence of severe calcification is associated with significantly lower midterm primary patency rates and higher rate of major adverse limb events after endovascular intervention for lower limb denovo arterial lesions.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Left Main Artery Disease

Left main coronary artery disease subtends a large area of potentially jeopardized myocardium. Percutaneous coronary intervention for severe left main coronary artery disease is a reasonable treatment option for select patients. Severe coronary artery calcium of the left main artery increases the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with increased risk of periprocedural complications and worse long-term clinical outcomes. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) utilizes sonic pressure waves to modify severe coronary artery calcium and has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to coronary atherectomy. However, left main lesions were excluded from regulatory approval clinical trials of IVL. Herein, we review all available data regarding the use of IVL treatment for severe left main coronary artery disease.

Safety and Long-Term Outcomes of Rotablation in Patients with Reduced (<50%) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (rEF) (The Rota-REF Study)

Clinical outcomes in patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain understudied. Our study sought to evaluate the impact of RA-PCI in patients with LV systolic dysfunction on long-term outcomes. Between 2015 and 2019, 4941 patients with reduced LV function (rEF) undergoing PCI (with or without RA) were included in the hospital database. The primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE). The secondary endpoint was 3-year MACCE. In-hospital MACCE rates were significantly higher in RA-PCI compared to standard PCI without RA (PCI) (7.6% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.0009). However, 3-years MACCE rates were similar in RA-PCI and PCI (26.40% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.948). In conclusion, RA-PCI in patients with rEF is feasible, safe, and shows similar long-term results to PCI.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: A DISRUPT CAD III Intravascular Ultrasound Substudy

BACKGROUND

Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions. We evaluated the mechanism and efficacy of IVL in facilitating optimal stent implantation in heavily calcified coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

Forty-six patients were initially enrolled as a part of the Disrupt CAD III study. Of these, 33 had pre-IVL, 24 had post-IVL, and 44 had post-stent IVUS evaluation. The final analysis was performed on 18 patients who had IVUS images interpretable at all three intervals. The primary endpoint was increase in minimum lumen area (MLA) from pre-IVL to post-IVL treatment to post-stenting.

RESULTS

Pre-IVL, MLA was 2.75 ± 0.84 mm2, percent area stenosis was 67.22 % ± 20.95 % with maximum calcium angle of 266.90° ± 78.30°, confirming severely calcified lesions. After IVL, MLA increased to 4.06 ± 1.41 mm2 (p = 0.0003), percent area stenosis decreased to 54.80 % ± 25.71 % (p = 0.0009), and maximum calcium angle decreased to 239.40° ± 76.73° (p = 0.003). There was a further increase in MLA to 6.84 ± 2.18 mm2 (p < 0.0001) and decrease in percent area stenosis to 30.33 % ± 35.08 % (p < 0.0001) post-stenting with minimum stent area of 6.99 ± 2.14 mm2. The success rate of stent delivery, implantation, and post-stent dilation was 100 % post-IVL.

CONCLUSION

In this first study evaluating the mechanism of IVL using IVUS, the primary endpoint of increase in MLA from pre-IVL to post-IVL treatment to post-stenting was successfully achieved. Our study showed that the use of IVL-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved vessel compliance, facilitating optimal stent implantation in de novo severely calcified lesions.

Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Intervention in Calcified Coronary Lesions Showed Good Clinical Outcomes during One Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Calcified coronary lesions can cause stent under-expansion, malapposition, and polymer degradation, hence increasing the risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been used regularly to improve outcomes. Our primary aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of IVUS-guided PCI in calcified coronary lesions.

METHODS

From August 2018 to December 2021, we prospectively included 300 patients in the CAPIRO study (CAlcified plaque in patients receiving Resolute Onyx^®) at three educational hospitals in Jeonbuk Province. We studied 243 patients (265 lesions) who were followed up for over a year. Based on coronary calcification by IVUS analysis, the patient population was categorized into two groups (Group I: non/mild calcification; Group II: moderate/severe calcification (maximum calcium arc >180° and calcium length > 5 mm)). One-to-one Propensity Score Matching was used to match the baseline characteristics. The stent expansion rate was analyzed by recent criteria. The primary clinical outcome was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), which included Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

After follow-up time, the MACE rate in Group I was 1.99%, comparable to Group II's 1.09% (p = 0.594). The components of MACE did not significantly differ between the two groups. Based on absolute MSA or MSA/MVA at MSA site criteria, the stent expansion rate in Group II was lower than that of Group I. Nevertheless, based on recent relative criteria, the stent expansion rate in both groups was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

After more than a year of follow-up, IVUS-guided PCI in moderate/severe calcification lesions was associated with good clinical outcomes, which was comparable with non/mild calcification lesions. Future studies with a larger sample size and a more extended follow-up period are required to clarify our findings.

Intravascular Lithotripsy as a Novel Treatment Method for Calcified Unprotected Left Main Diseases-Comparison to Rotational Atherectomy-Short-Term Outcomes

Background: The unprotected calcified Left Main disease represents a high-risk subset for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and it is associated with a higher number of periprocedural complications and an increased rate of in-stent thrombosis and restenosis. Adequate lesion preparation plays a crucial role in achieving a favorable PCI outcome. Rotational Atherectomy (RA) is a well-established plaque-modifying method; nevertheless, the data regarding the effectiveness of RA in LM diseases is scarce. Recently, the novel ShockWave-Intravascular-Lithotripsy(S-IVL) device has been introduced to the PCI armamentarium in order to modify the calcified plaque. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 44 consecutive subjects who underwent the LM-PCI, and who were supported by either the RA or S-IVL. Results: The Rota group consisted of 29 patients with a mean syntax score of 28.0 ± 7.5. The S-IVL group was composed of 15 subjects with a syntax score of 23.3 ± 13.0 There were no statistical differences regarding MACE between the RA and Shockwave arms of the in-hospital group (10.3% vs. 6.7%), or in the six month (17.2% vs. 13.3%) follow-up group. Conclusions: RA and S-IVL could be safe and effective therapeutic strategies for calcified LM disease. Further studies with a higher number of participants and longer follow-up times are warranted to establish the potential benefits of RA and S-IVL for the management of LM stenosis.

Impact of Diabetes Duration on Clinical Outcome in Patients Receiving Rotational Atherectomy in Calcified Lesions in Korea-Results from ROCK Registry

There are limited data regarding the clinical impact of diabetes duration for patients with heavy calcified coronary lesions. We sought to determine the clinical impact of diabetes duration on clinical outcomes in patients with heavily calcified lesions who required rotational atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 540 diabetic patients (583 lesions) were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2019. Patients were classified into three subgroups: patients with no diabetes mellitus (non-DM), shorter duration (S-DM), and longer duration (L-DM), of which duration was divided at 10 years. During 18 months of follow-up-duration, diabetes duration was significantly associated with the primary outcome. The incidence rate of target-vessel failure (TVF), the primary outcome, was significantly higher in the L-DM group compared with non-DM or S-DM. Among secondary outcomes, any repeat revascularization (RR) was frequently observed in the L-DM compared with other groups. In multivariate analysis, the risk of TVF and any RR was 1.9 times and 2.4 times higher in L-DM than in non-DM, respectively. This study firstly demonstrated that there is an association between a longer DM duration and poor clinical outcomes in patients with severe calcified CAD after PCI. More careful monitoring for recurrence is needed during follow-up in those patients.

Evaluation of only heparin-based rota-flush solution against alternative rota-flush solution in patients with severe coronary artery calcification undergoing rotational atherectomy

Objective

There is limited evidence on feasibility and safety of only heparin rota-flush(OHRF)solution in rotational atherectomy (RA). We compared the safety and efficacy of OHRF solution with alternative rota-flush (ARF) solution in patients who underwent RA.

Methods

A total of 48 patients who underwent RA were enrolled in the study. In 25 patients OHRF solution and in 23 patients ARF solution was utilized. The study end points were procedural success rateandrota-related adverse cardiovascular event (RRAE) including slow flow, no reflow, bradycardia, and hemodynamic instability.

Results

Procedural success was achieved in all patients in both the OHRF and ARF groups. There was no statistically significant difference in RRAE between the two groups(32.0% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.83).

Conclusion

OHRF solution appears a more simplistic solution while performing rotablation as compared to ARF solution. Side effects such as hypotension and bradycardia can be circumvented with OHRF solution during rotablation.

Successful off-label use of rotational atherectomy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A case report

Rotational atherectomy (RA) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncommon and its use in a thrombotic lesion is labelled a contraindication by its manufacturer due to the concern for further increase in platelet activation and aggregation by the spinning burr or distal embolization of the thrombotic material promoting no-reflow (NR). However, thrombus burden varies significantly in the STEMI setting and can be classified according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade (TG). This case demonstrates the successful off-label use of RA-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention to facilitate treatment of a heavily calcified ostial right coronary artery lesion with low thrombotic burden (TIMI TG 0) in an octogenarian STEMI patient. Atherectomy drug cocktails, intracoronary vasodilators, short burr runs and avoidance of rotating the burr at slower than minimum approved rotational speed contribute to atherectomy success and decrease the chances of NR.

Outcomes of rotational atherectomy for severely calcified coronary lesions: A single center 5-year experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of accumulated experience on rotational atherectomy (RA) operation regarding to in-hospital outcomes in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, 540 de novo lesions with calcified coronary lesions treated by RA and DES implantation at our center were retrospectively assessed. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as all cause death, cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, and stroke.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2019, RA operations were 22, 60, 102, 157, and 199 cases, respectively. Rates of procedural complications were 4.5, 3.3, 11.8, 8.3, and 7.5%, respectively. Rates of in-hospital MACE were 0, 0, 3.9, 2.5, and 2.0%, respectively. Compared with planned RA, bailout RA was associated with more contrast use (207.5 ± 82.8 ml vs. 189.2 ± 70.0 ml, p = .008). As for procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes, no differences were observed between two strategies. Logistic regression revealed that hypertension was independently associated with complications (OR 5.830, 95% CI 1.382-24.591, p = .016). For MACE, independent risk factors were heart failure (OR 17.593, 95% CI 1.475-209.816, p = .023) and procedural complications (OR 127.629, 95% CI 15.135-1,076.258, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Along with the rapid increase of RA use and accumulated experience, rates of complications and MACE went up first and then dropped down. Hypertension was found to be an independent risk factor of procedural complications. For in-hospital MACE, independent risk factors were heart failure and procedural complications.

Management of calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions

Calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions (CBL) remain a challenge for the interventional cardiologist. Evidence regarding treatment of CBL is minimal. Optimal plaque modification is the most important step prior to stent deployment. Provisional stenting is the preferred strategy for most bifurcation lesions. However, two-stent strategy should be considered for BL with compromised large SB (>2.5 mm) supplying a large territory, >70% SB stenosis and lesions more than 5 mm long. In this contemporary review article, we present a simplified approach to treating CBL and demonstrate the approach to specific case examples using our newly developed mobile application, BifurcAID.

Successful double-layer metal stents rotational ablation under 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography guidance: a case report

Background

Stent ablation with rotational atherectomy has been considered a bail-out strategy for the treatment of severe stent underexpansion. Only a few reports have yet shown rotational ablation for double-layer metal struts.

Case presentation

We present a case of 80-year-old female patient presented to our hospital because of worsening effort angina. Coronary angiography revealed severe in-stent restenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations found that severe stenosis occurred at the overlap region with 2-layer underexpanded stents and circumferential calcification beneath them. Under the guidance of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) OCT, we successfully performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of this lesion after adequate stent ablation, high-pressure balloon dilatation, and subsequent everolimus-eluting stent implantation. The patient recovered well uneventfully and discharged from hospital 7 days later. No restenosis occurred after 12 months.

Conclusions

We report a very rare case of in-stent restenosis due to double-layer underexpanded stents. The entire percutaneous coronary intervention procedure was performed step by step under the guidance of high-resolution OCT. Our findings highlight the specific value of 2D and 3D OCT guidance in double-layer stents rotational ablation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-01965-z.

Outcomes with Orbital and Rotational Atherectomy for Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to describe the contemporary outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) vs. rotational atherectomy (RA) use for inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States. Data on the use of OA vs. RA in contemporary inpatient PCI are limited.

METHODS

We queried the Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) from January to November for the years 2016-2017 to identify hospitalizations of patients who underwent PCI with atherectomy. We conducted a multivariate regression analysis to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 77,040 records of patients who underwent inpatient PCI with atherectomy. Of those, 71,610 (93%) had RA, and 5430 (7%) had OA. There was no significant change in the trend of using OA or RA over 2016 and 2017. OA was less utilized in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (4.3% vs. 46.8%, p < 0.001). In our cohort, OA was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (3.1% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and 30-day urgent readmission (< 0.01% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.009), but a higher risk of coronary perforation (1.7% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and cardiac tamponade (1% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001) and a higher cost of index hospitalization ($28,199 vs. $23,188, p < 0.001) compared with RA.

CONCLUSION

RA remains the predominant atherectomy modality for inpatient PCI in the United States (93%). There was no change in the trend of use for either modality over the years 2016 and 2017. OA was noted to have a lower incidence of in-hospital death, but a higher risk of coronary perforation and a higher cost of index hospitalization for the overall unmatched cohorts.

Long-Term Prognosis of Moderate to Severe Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Moderate/severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) predicts worse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, to date most studies have been modest in size and with limited follow-up. We aimed to assess the association between calcification severity and long-term clinical outcomes in a large cohort undergoing PCI.Methods and Results:In total, 10,068 consecutive patients who underwent PCI at Fuwai Hospital were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients were categorized as none/mild or moderate/severe CAC according to the severity of the target lesion by visual assessment of coronary angiography. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite event of death, myocardial infarction and revascularization, at 5 years were assessed. None/mild CAC was observed in 8,229 (81.7%) patients, and moderate/severe CAC was observed in 1,839 (18.3%) patients. Patients with moderate/severe CAC had a significantly higher rate of 5-year unplanned revascularization (15.2% vs. 13.2%, P=0.022) and MACE (20.7% vs. 17.9%, P=0.005). After propensity score matching, the moderate/severe CAC group still had a higher rate of 5-year unplanned revascularization (15.2% vs. 12.6%, P=0.019). Cox regression analysis using clinically significant variables revealed moderate/severe calcification was independently associated with higher risk of 2-year unplanned target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio (HR)=1.287, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.036-1.600, P=0.023) and MACE (HR=1.242, 95% CI: 1.039-1.484, P=0.017), but not 5-year unplanned revascularization and MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PCI, moderate/severe coronary calcification increases the risk of long-term MACE.

Impact of Lesion Preparation Technique on Side Branch Compromise in Calcified Coronary Bifurcations: A Subgroup Analysis of the PREPARE-CALC Trial

Objectives

To analyze the impact of different techniques of lesion preparation of severely calcified coronary bifurcation lesions.

Background

The impact of different techniques of lesion preparation of severely calcified coronary bifurcation lesions is poorly investigated.

Methods

We performed an as-treated analysis on 47 calcified bifurcation lesions treated with scoring/cutting balloons (SCB) and 68 lesions treated with rotational atherectomy (RA) in the PREPARE-CALC trial. Compromised side branch (SB) as assessed in the final angiogram was the primary outcome measure and was defined as any significant stenosis, dissection, or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3.

Results

True bifurcation lesions were present in 49% vs. 43% of cases in the SCB and RA groups, respectively. After stent implantation, SB balloon dilatation was necessary in around one-third of cases (36% vs. 38%; p = 0.82), and a two-stent technique was performed in 21.3% vs. 25% (p = 0.75). At the end of the procedure, the SB remained compromised in 15 lesions (32%) in the SCB group and 5 lesions (7%) in the RA group (p = 0.001). Large coronary dissections were more frequently observed in the SCB group (13% vs. 2%; p = 0.02). Postprocedural levels of cardiac biomarkers were significantly higher in patients with a compromised SB at the end of the procedure.

Conclusions

In the PREPARE-CALC trial, side branch compromise was more frequently observed after lesion preparation with SCB as compared with RA. Consequently, in calcified bifurcation lesions, an upfront debulking with an RA-based strategy might optimize the result in the side branch.

Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Modeling of Stent Deployment in Heavily Calcified Coronary Lesion

In this work, a heavily calcified coronary artery model was reconstructed from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to investigate the impact of calcification characteristics on stenting outcomes. The calcification was quantified at various cross sections in terms of angle, maximum thickness, and area. The stent deployment procedure, including the crimping, expansion, and recoil, was implemented. The influence of calcification characteristics on stent expansion, malapposition, and lesion mechanics was characterized. Results have shown that the minimal lumen area following stenting occurred at the cross section with the greatest calcification angle. The calcification angle constricted the stretchability of the lesion and thus resulted in a small lumen area. The maximum principal strain and von Mises stress distribution patterns in both the fibrotic tissue and artery were consistent with the calcification profiles. The radially projected region of the calcification tends to have less strain and stress. The peak strain and stress of the fibrotic tissue occurred near the interface with the calcification. It is also the region with a high risk of tissue dissection and strut malapposition. In addition, the superficial calcification with a large angle aggregated the malapposition at the middle of the calcification arc. These detailed mechanistic quantifications could be used to provide a fundamental understanding of the role of calcification in stent expansions, as well as to exploit their potential for enhanced pre- and post-stenting strategies.

Clinical impact of calcified nodule in patients with heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the incidence and clinical impact of calcified nodule (CN) in patients with heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy (RA).

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether CN impacts adversely on clinical outcomes in patients with heavily calcified lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and February 2014, 264 patients after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation following RA were retrospectively enrolled. CN was defined as a convex shape of the luminal side of calcium as assessed by intravascular ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 5-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CDTLR), and definite stent thrombosis (ST).

RESULTS

CN was observed in 128 patients (48.5%) with heavily calcified lesions. Cumulative 5-year incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the CN group than in the non-CN group, mainly driven by a higher rate of CDTLR and ST (35.4% vs. 18.8%, p < .001; 23.2% vs. 7.9%, p < .001; 7.0% vs. 0.93%, p = .009, respectively). Independent risk factors of 5-year MACE included hemodialysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.39, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.00-5.73, p < .001), CN (HR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.49-4.27, p < .001), ostial lesion (HR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.58-5.78, p = .001), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (HR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.27-3.70, p = .005), and right coronary artery lesion (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.07-3.11, p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

CN was observed in 48.5% of heavily calcified lesions, resulting in unfavorable long-term clinical outcomes after second-generation DES implantation following RA.

Rotational Atherectomy: A Contemporary Appraisal

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an atheroablative technology that enables percutaneous coronary intervention for complex, calcified coronary lesions. RA works on the principle of 'differential cutting' and preferentially ablates hard, inelastic, calcified plaque. The objective of RA use has evolved from plaque debulking to plaque modification to enable balloon angioplasty and optimal stent expansion. The clinical experience over the past 30 years has informed the current best practices for RA with use of smaller burr sizes, short ablation runs a 'pecking' motion, and avoidance of sudden decelerations. This has led to significant improvements in procedural safety and a reduced rate of associated complications. This article reviews the principles, clinical indications, contemporary evidence, technical considerations and complications associated with the use of RA.

Short- and Mid-Term Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Rotational Atherectomy in Aortoostial Coronary Lesions in Left Main or Right Coronary Arteries

OBJECTIVE

To determine short-term and mid-term prognosis in patients with calcified ostial coronary lesions who underwent rotational atherectomy (RA).

BACKGROUND

RA was developed to facilitate stenting in complex lesions. Treatment of calcified aortoostial coronary lesions with RA appears to have poorer procedure outcomes than nonostial lesions; yet the literature on this topic is scarce.

METHODS

Of 498 consecutive patients who underwent RA, a total of 80 (16.1%) presented with aortoostial lesions. A comparative, monocentric study was performed between patients with aortoostial and nonaortoostial stenosis, in a retrospective registry. The primary endpoint was the procedural success rate. Secondary endpoints were the rates of major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days and 24 months.

RESULTS

The procedural success rate was high and similar in patients with and without ostial lesions (96.3% vs 94.7%, p=0.78), as was the rate of angiographic complications (7.5% vs 8.4%, p=0.80). However, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the aortoostial group (11.3% vs 4.8%, p=0.04), as was the 24-month rate of MACE (43.8% vs 31.8%, p=0.04). The aortoostial location of the lesion was an independent factor associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events at 24 months (HR = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.03-2.26, p=0.035).

CONCLUSION

Procedural success and complication rates were similar in patients with and without aortoostial lesions. Despite a poor short- and mid-term prognosis, rotational atherectomy appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option for calcified aortoostial coronary lesions.

Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Systolic Function Undergoing Rotational Atherectomy: A Single-Center Observational Retrospective Study

Introduction

Rotational atherectomy (RA) historically was contraindicated in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function due to inherent cardio-depressive effects. Contemporary RA practice is less aggressive than traditional RA and no longer withheld from patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). The aim of this analysis is to explore the outcomes of rotational atherectomy (RA) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods

Patients undergoing RA (n = 644) were divided into three groups according to LVEF (severely reduced ≤ 35%, n = 82; moderately reduced 36–54%, n = 170; and preserved LVEF ≥ 55%, n = 392).

Results

Compared to patients with preserved LVEF, those with severely reduced LVEF had higher rates of angiographic failure (12.2 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.003) and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE: 9.8 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.004) driven by more peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI: 6.1 vs. 1.5%, p = 0.049). In-hospital outcomes were similar between patients with preserved and moderately reduced LVEF. At 5-year follow-up, a stepwise increase in all-cause death was observed with lower LVEF (preserved: 15%, moderately reduced: 23%, severely reduced: 43%; p < 0.001). On the other hand, revascularization and MI rates at 5 years were not affected by LVEF.

Conclusions

Compared to patients with preserved LVEF, those with severely reduced LVEF have worse acute outcomes after RA, whereas a moderate reduction of LVEF poses no additional acute hazard after RA. Up to 5 years, the extent of left ventricular dysfunction was associated with a stepwise increase in mortality.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40119-019-0143-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Stentablation with Rotational Atherectomy for the Management of Underexpanded and Undilatable Coronary Stents

Stentablation with rotational atherectomy for the management of undilatable underexpanded coronary stents is a unique application associated with excellent periprocedural and in-hospital outcomes. Data regarding long-term outcomes remains limited, however the procedure appears to be associated with high prevalence of target lesion revascularization. Given the complexity of such lesions and few available interventional remedies; it is a reasonably safe and widely available approach of which operators should be aware. When stentablation is performed, the principles which guide contemporary rotational atherectomy and percutaneous coronary intervention, including intravascular imaging, should be applied.

Procedural and Long-Term Ischemic Outcomes of Tight Subtotal Occlusions Treated with Orbital Atherectomy: An ORBIT II Subanalysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Orbital atherectomy is an effective treatment strategy to modify severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent placement. Traversing a severely calcified subtotal occlusion with the crown may be more challenging compared with a less severely stenotic lesion. The purpose of this ORBIT II subanalysis was to evaluate outcomes post-orbital atherectomy (OA) treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis.

METHODS/MATERIALS

ORBIT II, a single-arm, prospective, multicenter trial, enrolled 443 subjects with severely calcified coronary lesions. Patients with chronic total occlusions were excluded from the trial. Subjects with the OA device activated were stratified based on pre-procedure percent stenosis: ≥95% stenosis (N = 91) and <95% stenosis (N = 341). Procedural success and 3-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were compared.

RESULTS

The severe angiographic complications rates were 6.6% and 6.7% in the ≥95% and <95% stenosis groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in procedural success (94.5% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.120). 3-year MACE rates were similar (27.1% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.548), as were the rates of cardiac death (5.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.665) and MI (7.9% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.244). The TVR rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group (19.1% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In ORBIT II, OA treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis resulted in a high rate of procedural success. Although the 3-year revascularization rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group, it is not unexpected given the challenge of treating such complex lesions. The results of this analysis suggest that OA may be a reasonable treatment strategy for tight, severely calcified subtotal occlusions.

SUMMARY

The purpose of this ORBIT II subanalysis was to evaluate outcomes post-orbital atherectomy (OA) treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis. In ORBIT II, OA treatment of lesions with ≥95% stenosis resulted in a high rate of procedural success. Although the 3-year revascularization rate was higher in the ≥95% stenosis group, it is not unexpected given the challenge of treating such complex lesions. The results of this analysis suggest that OA may be a reasonable treatment strategy for tight, severely calcified subtotal occlusions.

Chemical Components, Biological Activities, and Toxicological Evaluation of the Fruit (Aril) of Two Precious Plant Species from Genus Taxus

The fruit (aril) of the endangered genus Taxus plants is an abandoned herbal resource. Traditionally, people enthusiastically focus on its bark, its renewable, tremendous arils fall into the soil with seeds after they are mature. The present research investigated the fruit of two species from the genus Taxus, Taxus chinensis var. mairei, and Taxus media, with regards to their antioxidant and antihyperglycaemic activities, safety, and bioactive constituents. Results showed that T. chinensis var. mairei and T. media both had certain biological activities with T. chinensis var. mairei better in antioxidant activity and T. media better in antihyperglycaemic activity. Correlation analysis revealed that the differences in bioactivities depended on content of their mainly chemical components. The mice acute oral toxicity test indicated that the methanol extracts of the two biotypes of Taxus were safe. And nineteen compounds were tentatively assigned from the two varieties, via tandem mass spectrometry using a LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS instrument, which included phenols, flavonoids, and terpenes. These results indicate a possible application of Taxus fruit extracts in various fields like in food industry, however, this still needs further investigations.

In-Hospital and 1-Year Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy and Stent Implantation in Patients With Severely Calcified Unprotected Left Main Narrowings (from the Multicenter ROTATE Registry)

Heavily calcified unprotected left main (ULM) disease continues to be a challenging situation and represent a high-risk subset for interventional cardiologist. To date, there are limited data investigating the results after rotational atherectomy (RA) in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes after RA of heavily calcified ULM lesions. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all calcified patients with ULM (n = 86) enrolled in the multicenter international ROTATE registry (overall patients, n = 962). End points of the study were the in-hospital and 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization in the ULM versus non-ULM group. Patients in the ULM group were older (p = 0.01) and more frequently with diabetes (p = 0.001) compared with the non-ULM group, whereas intravascular ultrasound guidance was higher, even if not systematic, in the ULM group (p <0.001). No difference was reported between ULM versus non-ULM groups in terms of in-hospital MACE (5.8% vs 8%). At 1 year, MACE rate was higher in ULM versus non-ULM (26.4% vs 14.9%, p = 0.002) mostly driven by target-vessel revascularization (20.3% vs 12.7%, p = 0.05). Even definite/probable stent thrombosis rate was higher in the ULM group (3.9% vs 0.8%). All these events were subacute and 2/3 (75%) were fatal. In conclusion, our multicenter experience shows that RA followed by stent implantation in patients with heavily calcified ULM narrowing is feasible and associated with good in-hospital results. Patient (age and diabetes) and procedural aspects (relatively low intravascular ultrasound guidance) may affect the worse subacute mid-term prognosis in the more complex ULM group.

Comparison of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Orbital Atherectomy for the Treatment of Heavily Calcified Coronary Plaques

We evaluated the outcomes of patients with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) who underwent rotational atherectomy (RA) and orbital atherectomy (OA). Severe CAC increases the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of the difficulty in optimizing stent expansion, leading to worse clinical outcomes. Both devices are effective treatment strategies for severe CAC. No comparisons have been performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after RA and OA. The outcomes of 67 patients with severe CAC who underwent RA from July 2012 to June 2015 and 60 patients who underwent OA from February 2014 to September 2016 were evaluated. The primary end point was the rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, comprising cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. The primary end point was similar in the RA and OA groups (6% vs 6%, p >0.9), as were the individual end points of death (0% vs 2%, p = 0.8), myocardial infarction (6% vs 4%, p = 0.7), target vessel revascularization (0% vs 0%, p >0.9), and stroke (0% vs 0%, p >9). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Angiographic complications were uncommon in both groups. No patient had stent thrombosis. In conclusion, both RA and OA are safe and effective for the treatment of severe CAC as they provided similar clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up.

Impact of lesion calcification on angiographic outcomes after Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: an observation from the ABSORB Japan trial

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the impact of lesion calcification on angiographic outcomes after Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation in comparison with those after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present post hoc analysis of the ABSORB Japan randomised trial compared post-procedure and 13-month angiographic outcomes between patients implanted with BVS and CoCr-EES based on the presence or absence of calcification, excluding extremely heavily calcified lesions or lesions requiring rotational atherectomy. The study population comprised 384 patients with 384 lesions (including 114 lesions [29.7%] with moderate or severe calcification), classified into two subgroups: calcification, 114 (BVS: n=72 and CoCr-EES: n=42) and non-calcification, 270 (BVS: n=181 and CoCr-EES: n=89). Follow-up angiography was performed in 94.8% of patients. Both post-procedure and follow-up in-device minimal lumen diameters were comparable in both the BVS arm (calcification vs. non-calcification: 2.43±0.32 mm vs. 2.43±0.39 mm, p=0.91 and 2.17±0.49 mm vs. 2.27±0.47 mm, p=0.17) and in the CoCr-EES arm (2.68±0.34 mm vs. 2.65±0.42 mm, p=0.62 and 2.57±0.52 mm vs. 2.47±0.53 mm, p=0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate or severe lesion calcification (excluding patients with extremely heavily calcified lesions or lesions requiring rotational atherectomy) does not negatively affect angiographic outcomes at both post-procedure and 13-month follow-up after BVS implantation.

Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Undergoing Orbital Atherectomy

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the clinical outcomes of elderly patients who underwent orbital atherectomy for the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) prior to stenting.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severe CAC is associated with worse clinical outcomes including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The elderly represents a high-risk group of patients, often have more comorbid conditions, and have worse outcomes after PCI compared to younger patients. Clinical trials and a large multicenter registry have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of severe CAC. Clinical outcomes of elderly patients who undergo orbital atherectomy are unknown.

METHODS

Of the 458 patients, 229 were ≥75 years old (elderly) and 229 were <75 years old (younger). The primary endpoint was rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), comprised of cardiac death, MI, TVR, and stroke.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was similar in the elderly and younger groups (2.2% vs. 2.2%, P = 1), as were the individual endpoints of death (2.2% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.1), MI (0.9% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.65), TVR (0% vs. 0%, P = 1), and stroke (0% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.32). The rates of angiographic complications and stent thrombosis were similarly low in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly represented a sizeable number of patients who underwent orbital atherectomy. It is a safe and effective treatment strategy for elderly patients with severe CAC as the clinical outcomes were similar to their younger counterparts. A randomized trial should further clarify the role of orbital atherectomy in these patients.

Impact of Calcification on Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Superficial Femoral Artery Disease

Purpose: To investigate whether the severity of lesion calcification assessed by the novel peripheral artery calcification scoring system (PACSS) was associated with clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) for superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 394 consecutive patients (mean age 72±8 years; 290 men) with intermittent claudication [223 (57%) with diabetes, 81 (21%) on hemodialysis] who underwent successful EVT for de novo SFA lesions [length 152.1±95.7 mm; 199 (50%) TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II class C/D] between January 2010 and December 2013. The patients were retrospectively categorized using the PACSS classification (grades 0–4: no visible calcification of the target lesion, unilateral wall calcification <5 cm, unilateral calcification ≥5 cm, bilateral wall calcification <5 cm, and bilateral calcification ≥5 cm, respectively). The main outcome was primary patency, while the secondary outcome measures were mortality and major adverse limb events [MALE: any intervention (repeat EVT or surgical revision) or major (above ankle) amputation]. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to explore whether the PACSS classification was an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The distribution of PACSS grades was 0 in 54%, grade 1 in 16%, grade 2 in 12%, grade 3 in 9%, and grade 4 in 9%. The 2-year primary patency rates in these grades, respectively, were 70.0%, 66.6%, 72.1%, 55.6%, and 36.3% (p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, PACSS grade 4 (HR 2.74, 95% CI 1.56 to 4.83, p<0.001), diabetes (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.20, p=0.022), lesion length (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.006), and vessel diameter (HR 0.80, 85% CI 0.65 to 0.98, p=0.038) were associated with loss of primary patency. PACSS grade 4 was also associated with MALE and mortality (p=0.048 and 0.011, respectively). Bare metal stent use (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.73, p<0.001) was positively associated with primary patency. Conclusion: PACSS grade 4 calcification was independently associated with clinical outcomes after EVT for de novo SFA lesions.