Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), first described in 1978, occurs when a prosthetic valve functions normally, but has an effective orifice area that is too small relative to the patient's body surface area. It results in residual left ventricular afterload and higher transvalvular pressure gradient, which has been considered to impair prognosis. PPM following surgical aortic replacement is reportedly associated with worse clinical outcomes, such as high mortality. However, the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. There is conflicting evidence on the impact of PPM following TAVI due to differences across studies in terms of follow-up period, methods, patient populations, and type of bioprosthetic valve. The present review summarizes the most recent evidence on PPM after TAVI.

Effect of Radiolucent Line-Guided Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Subsequent Pacemaker Rate

In the era of expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) indications for low surgical risk patients, conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after TAVI remain a serious concern. We aimed to assess the impact of the radiolucent line-guided technique for the SAPIEN 3 implantation on reducing the rates of new-onset PPI after TAVI. A total of 326 patients treated with the SAPIEN 3 using either the radiolucent line-guided technique (lucent group, 170 patients [52.1%]) or the center marker-guided technique (conventional group, 156 patients [47.9%]) were prospectively included in our database. The prosthesis position, and 30-day and 3-year clinical outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Compared with the conventional group, the lucent group had a higher prosthesis position (1.7 ± 0.9 mm vs 4.2±1.5 mm, p <0.001) and lower 30-day PPI rates (2.9% vs 13.5%, p <0.001). The other periprocedural complications including valve dislodgement and coronary obstruction, and 30-day and 3-year mortality were comparable between the groups. However, the prosthesis frame extending above sinotubular junction was more frequently observed in the lucent group on the side of left coronary sinus (53.4% vs 31.4%, p <0.001) and right coronary sinus (35.0% vs 20.2%, p = 0.001), signifying a potential risk for "subsequent difficulties to access coronary ostia" and "coronary obstruction during future redo TAVI." In conclusion, the radiolucent line-guided technique predictably provided an extremely high position of the SAPIEN 3, reducing the postprocedural PPI rates compared with the center marker-guided technique.