Outcomes of retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the OPEN-CTO registry

Antegrade approach versus retrograde approach percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Retrograde approach has notably improved success rates of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, longer procedural time, increase use of fluoroscopy and contrast dye have been reported in retrograde techniques in CTO PCI. We aimed to study in-hospital and long-term outcomes of retrograde approach versus antegrade approach in CTO PCI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and Cochrane Central until June 2023 to include all relevant studies that compared retrograde approach versus antegrade approach in patients with CTO PCI. We synthesized the outcome data using a random-effects model, expressing the effect estimates as odds ratios (OR) or mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies comprising 21,276 patients were included in the analysis. Regarding in-hospital outcomes, antegrade approach was associated with lower odds of MACE (OR= 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.23 to 0.51), all-cause mortality (OR= 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.64), MI (OR= 0.36, 95 % CI: 0.25 to 0.53), urgent pericardiocentesis (OR= 0.27, 95 % CI: 0.16 to 0.46), CIN (OR= 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.33 to 0.65), procedural complications (OR= 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.33 to 0.83), target vessel perforation (OR= 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.32 to 0.64). while antegrade was associated with higher success rates (OR= 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.1 to 1.22).

CONCLUSION

Compared to antegrade technique, retrograde was associated with higher risk for in-hospital and long-term adverse events, and preferably should be performed in more complex CTO lesions.

Prognostic Impact of Target Vessel in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the coronary arteries in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery is associated with better outcome than unsuccessful PCI. Randomized data have not found invasive treatment of non-CTO LAD lesion to be associated with better outcome. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of CTO revascularization stratified on target treated vessel compared with non-CTO LAD PCI. The hypothesis was that successful PCI of LAD CTO and non-LAD CTO and unsuccessful non-LAD CTO were associated with the same prognosis as non-CTO LAD lesions, whereas patients with unsuccessful LAD CTO were associated with a poorer prognosis. The study was a population-based cohort study, including consecutive patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2019 in the Central Denmark Region. Patients with acute myocardial infarction within 30 days were excluded. Patients with CTO were stratified by occluded vessel and procedural success. The primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality and was calculated as a hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Secondary end points were myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization. In total, 21,141 patients were screened, 4,518 had non-CTO LAD PCI, and 1,475 had CTO PCI. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 5.8 years (3.6 to 8.8). In the successful CTO groups, the adjusted risk for all-cause mortality was equal to patients with non-CTO LAD (LAD CTO hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.14 [0.90 to 1.44], non-LAD CTO 1.09 [0.95 to 1.27]). Patients with unsuccessful LAD CTO had a higher risk than patients with non-CTO LAD, whereas unsuccessful non-LAD CTO had not (unsuccessful LAD 1.88 [1.33 to 2.65], unsuccessful non-LAD 1.26 [0.97 to 1.63]). In conclusion, successful LAD and non-LAD CTO PCI had the same prognosis as non-CTO LAD PCI, whereas only unsuccessful LAD CTO PCI had a poorer prognosis. Patients with LAD CTO are a high-risk population, and dedicated CTO trials are needed to confirm this finding and establish guideline recommendations.

Short- and long-term outcomes of antegrade versus retrograde approaches in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) involves severe coronary artery blockage that impairs blood flow and affects 15-20 % of patients undergoing coronary angiography and over 40 % with diabetes or heart failure. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is used to restore blood flow in such cases. The retrograde approach, developed due to lower success with the antegrade method in complex cases, improves outcomes but increases complications. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of both approaches to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus until June 5, 2024, to find studies comparing antegrade and retrograde approaches in CTO-PCI patients. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using R software (version 4.4.1), with significance set at p < 0.05. Random-effects models were used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 22 observational studies with 49,152 CTO-PCI patients: 35,844 in the antegrade arm and 13,308 in the retrograde arm. The antegrade approach showed significantly lower risks of in-hospital outcomes, including mortality [RR: 0.45; p < 0.001], myocardial infarction [RR: 0.37; p < 0.001], major adverse cardiovascular events [RR: 0.34; p < 0.001], and cerebrovascular events [RR: 0.50; p = 0.011]. Long-term outcomes, such as all-cause mortality [RR: 0.71; p = 0.157] and myocardial infarction [RR: 0.76; p = 0.438], were comparable between both approaches.

CONCLUSION

The antegrade technique shows better outcomes and procedural advantages over retrograde revascularization, though long-term outcomes are similar. Further studies, especially randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Antegrade and Retrograde Techniques for Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularizations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) present significant challenges in interventional cardiology. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of retrograde versus antegrade techniques in CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched through June 20, 2024. Studies comparing outcomes between antegrade and retrograde methods for CTO-PCI were included. Primary outcomes were procedural and technical success. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction. The final analysis included seventeen studies. The antegrade approach showed a 5% higher likelihood of technical success (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09) and 14% higher odds of procedural success (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10-1.19) compared to the retrograde approach. The antegrade group also demonstrated lower risks of MACE, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63). This meta-analysis suggests that the antegrade approach in CTO-PCI is associated with higher success rates and lower risks of adverse outcomes compared to the retrograde approach. However, the retrograde technique remains crucial for complex lesions and patients with multiple comorbidities.

Is it Worthy Enough to Revascularize Chronically Occluded Coronaries?

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) represent the "final frontier" of coronary interventions with the lowest procedural success rates and the most common reason for incomplete revascularization and referral to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). CTO lesions are not an infrequent finding during coronary angiography. They are often responsible for enhancing the complexity of the coronary disease burden thereby affecting the final interventional decision in the process. Notwithstanding the modest technical success of CTO-PCI, most of the earlier observational data demonstrated a clear survival benefit free of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing successful CTO revascularization. However, data from recent randomized trials fail to uphold the same survival advantage albeit, showing some trend toward improvement in left ventricular function, quality of life indicators and freedom from fatal ventricular arrythmia. Various guidance statements propose a well-defined role for CTO intervention in specific situations provided criterions for patient selection, appreciable inducible ischemia, myocardial viability and cost-risk-benefit analysis are met.

Impact of successful antegrade and retrograde CTO PCI on short-term prognosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carries risk of complications and should be attempted when the anticipated benefits exceed the potential risks. The primary indication for CTO-PCI is symptom improvement. However, the impact of CTO-PCI on angina and subsequent incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate remains controversial. Our aim was to study the impact of technically successful elective CTO-PCI on the procedural success rate and short-term MACE. The current study was a prospective cohort study that included a total of 80 patients who were referred to our center (Ain Shams University Hospitals) for elective CTO-PCI and underwent technically successful CTO-PCI. Data were collected on patient arrival to our department, and then, the patients were observed during hospital admission to record any In-Hospital MACE. These patients were then followed up for 6 months to record improvement or worsening of their symptoms and to assess occurrence of any MACE including hospitalization and undergoing symptom-driven coronary angiography.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 56 ± 9.6 years, and 73 patients (91%) were men. Sixty-two patients (77.5%) were done via an antegrade approach, and 18 patients (22.5%) were done via a retrograde approach with an overall procedural success rate of 91.25% (antegrade 93.5%, retrograde 83.3%). The overall mean procedure time was 102 min, the mean contrast volume used was 371 ml, and the mean cumulative air kerma dose was 7.2 Gy. The retrograde group required longer procedure times, larger volumes of contrast and higher exposure to radiation. The overall in-hospital MACE was 8.75%. Sixty-five patients in our study (81.25%) showed an improvement in the grade of their exertional dyspnea or angina within the 6-month follow-up period. Thirteen patients in our study (16.25%) needed re-hospitalization within a 6-month period after PCI. The overall target lesion revascularization rate at 6 months was 8.75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Technically successful CTO PCI in a well-equipped center with highly qualified CTO operators resulted in high procedural success rates and low incidence of short-term MACE.

Minimalistic Hybrid Approach for the Percutaneous Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Midterm Follow-Up of an International Multicenter Cohort

The minimalistic hybrid approach (MHA) is a recently proposed algorithm to perform chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), reducing the overall invasiveness of the procedure without impacting the acute results. However, data on midterm results are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of a multicenter international cohort of CTO PCI treated according to the MHA. Data from a consecutive series of patients with a CTO who underwent PCI according to the MHA between February 2019 and March 2022 were prospectively collected in 3 European centers and retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome was the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite outcome of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, at the last follow-up available. A total of 212 patients were included. The majority of the patients were symptomatic for angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 2 or 3: 63.7%) at the time of the index procedure. The mean Japanese-CTO and CASTLE scores were 2.1 ± 1.2 and 2.0 ± 1.3, respectively. Technical success (CTO open with optimal flow) was achieved in 198 patients (93.9%) and procedural success (technical success without in-hospital MACEs) in 195 (91.9%). At the last follow-up available (median 677 days), the cumulative incidence rate of MACEs was 11.5%; in particular, all-cause death was 7.4%, any myocardial infarction was 4.3%, and unplanned target vessel revascularization was 6.5%. In conclusion, the midterm results of the MHA seem to be in line with contemporary results of other CTO PCI algorithms, thus potentially validating the MHA as a valuable alternative, provided that interventionalists are already expert CTO operators and accustomed to the definitions and peculiarities of MHA.

Applicability of J-CTO channel score to predict microcatheter tracking during retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: Insights from the SURFING MICRO registry

BACKGROUND

The J-chronic total occlusion (CTO) channel score can predict guidewire tracking of the collateral channels (CCs), but its efficacy in predicting microcatheter tracking has never been tested in the setting of retrograde CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIMS

Predicting microcatheter collateral tracking during retrograde CTO-PCIs.

METHODS

A total of 189 patients undergoing retrograde CTO-PCI from April 2017 to August 2021 were screened. The primary outcome of interest was a correlation between J-CTO channel score and microcatheter tracking failure (MTF) after successful CC tracking by the guidewire. The independent association between anatomical features of the J-CTO channel score and the primary outcome of interest was explored.

RESULTS

After adjustment, only small size (adjusted OR: 12.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-89.82; p = 0.01) and continuous bends (adjusted OR: 14.15, 95% CI: 2.77-72.34; p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with an increased risk of MTF for septal collaterals. The small size was the only predictor of the MTF for epicardial collaterals (OR: 6.39, 95% CI: 1.13-35.96; p = 0.020) at univariate analysis. Patients in the MTF group had a lower incidence of procedural success compared with patients in the microcatheter tracking success (MTS) group (40.0% vs. 93.9%, p < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of collateral perforations (20.0% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Small and tortuous septal collaterals, identified by a score ≥3, are associated with an increased risk of MTF, lower incidence of procedural success, and higher risk of procedural complications driven by collateral perforations.

The Retrograde Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Technical Analysis and Procedural Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower success and higher complication rates when compared with the antegrade approach.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess contemporary techniques and outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI.

METHODS

We examined the baseline characteristics, procedural techniques and outcomes of 4,058 retrograde CTO PCIs performed at 44 centers between 2012 and 2023. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included any of the following in-hospital events: death, myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel revascularization, pericardiocentesis, cardiac surgery, and stroke.

RESULTS

The average J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score was 3.1 ± 1.1. Retrograde crossing was successful in 60.5% and lesion crossing in 81.6% of cases. The collaterals pathways successfully used were septals in 62.0%, saphenous vein grafts in 17.4%, and epicardials in 19.1%. The technical and procedural success rates were 78.7% and 76.6%, respectively. When retrograde crossing failed, technical success was achieved in 50.3% of cases using the antegrade approach. In-hospital MACE was 3.5%. The clinical coronary perforation rate was 5.8%. The incidence of in-hospital MACE with retrograde true lumen crossing, just marker antegrade crossing, conventional reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART), contemporary reverse CART, extended reverse CART, guide-extension reverse CART, and CART was 2.1%, 0.8%, 5.5%, 3.0%, 2.1%, 3.2%, and 4.1%, respectively; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Retrograde CTO PCI is utilized in highly complex cases and yields moderate success rates with 5.8% perforation and 3.5% periprocedural MACE rates. Among retrograde crossing strategies, retrograde true lumen puncture was the safest. There is need for improvement of the efficacy and safety of retrograde CTO PCI.

Antegrade versus Retrograde Approach for Recanalization of Ostial or Stumpless Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

Purpose

This research aimed to evaluate the procedural and in-hospital clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ostial or stumpless chronic total occlusion (CTO) utilizing both the antegrade-only and retrograde approaches.

Methods

A comprehensive retrospective examination was conducted on the procedural and in-hospital clinical outcomes of 89 consecutive patients subjected to ostial or stumpless CTO PCI at our institution between April 2015 and October 2022.

Results

The antegrade-only technique demonstrated a superior technical success rate (92.0% vs 71.9%, p = 0.041) and procedural success rate (92.0% vs 68.8%, p = 0.022) in comparison to the retrograde approach (RA). The RA group presented a notably elevated Japanese-CTO (J-CTO) score relative to the antegrade-only approach group (2.45±0.73 vs 1.64±0.70, p < 0.001). The antegrade-only approach group manifested an increased frequency of microchannels at the proximal stump relative to the RA group (56.0% vs 10.9%, p < 0.001). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI) were observed more prevalently in the RA group (18.8% vs 0, p = 0.003; 15.6% vs 0, p = 0.008; respectively). A J-CTO score below 2 and the manifestation of microchannels at the proximal stump were identified as predictors for successful antegrade-only approach PCI for ostial or stumpless CTO (OR: 2.79 [95% CI: 1.92-5.03, P =0.003]; OR: 2.89 [95% CI: 1.32-6.03, P =0.001]; respectively).

Conclusion

Relative to RA PCI for ostial or stumpless CTO, the antegrade-only approach is utilized for less complex CTO lesions and is associated with a diminished probability of in-hospital MACE.

Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions in Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The goal of this paper is to review the current evidence surrounding CTO PCI in patients with low EF, the most high-risk population to treat. We also present pertinent case examples and offer practical tips to increase success and lower complications when performing CTO PCI in patients with low EF.

RECENT FINDINGS

In a prospective randomized control study, greater improvement in angina frequency and quality of life, assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, was achieved by CTO PCI compared to optimal medical therapy. Furthermore, after successful CTO PCI, improvements in health status were similar in patients with both low and normal EF. CTO PCI can not only ameliorate symptoms of angina in patients with low EF but may also potentially improve EF in carefully selected populations. However, information regarding treatment of this high-risk population is lacking and large-scale studies targeting patients with severely reduced EF remain necessary.

Postdischarge prognostic significance of periprocedural myocardial injury after percutaneous intervention of chronic total occlusion

BACKGROUND

The postdischarge prognostic implication of periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains scarcely studied.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic value of periprocedural myocardial injury, defined by increased high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT) levels according to updated guidelines, after CTO PCI.

METHODS

Between September 2011 and April 2020, 726 patients undergoing CTO PCI at 2 Belgian referral centres were prospectively included and divided into 4 groups based on postprocedural hs-TnT levels (unelevated; ≥5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); ≥35 times the ULN; ≥70 times the ULN). Postprocedural hs-TnT levels were subsequently related to patient and procedural characteristics, 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; excluding in-hospital MACCE) as well as 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

At 1 year follow-up (FU), elevated hs-TnT≥5 times and ≥35 times the ULN were associated with higher MACCE rates (p=0.001; p=0.007, respectively). In addition, they also resulted in a higher 1-year mortality rate (p=0.009;p=0.021, respectively). Patients with increased hs-TnT≥5 times the ULN (35% of patients) more frequently had signs of more advanced atherosclerotic disease (previous CABG p<0.001; stroke p≤0.001 and peripheral vascular disease p<0.001) and had higher procedural complexity (Japanese CTO Score p=<0.001, stent length>48 mm p<0.001, procedure time p<0.001). Antegrade wire escalation did not result in lower event rate of postdischarge MACCE compared with the other CTO crossing techniques combined (p=0.158).

CONCLUSION

Periprocedural myocardial injury was associated with a significantly higher rate of MACCE and all-cause mortality after 12 months of FU.

Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions

Percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) has advanced greatly since its advent in the late 1970s through the development of dedicated wires and microcatheters, the improved skills of highly experienced operators and the adoption of new sophisticated strategies to guide procedural planning. The contemporary procedural success rate is 80-90% with a reduction in complications. Although there has been no improvement in prognosis in randomised trials to date, they, and other controlled registries of thousands of patients, confirm the pivotal role of CTO recanalisation in the treatment of angina and dyspnoea and an improvement in quality of life. Despite this evidence, CTO recanalisation is grossly underutilised. This review reports a detailed overview of the history, indications and treatment strategies for CTO recanalisation and hopes to increase interest among new, and especially young, operators in this demanding, rapidly evolving field of interventional cardiology.

Predictors of success in primary retrograde strategy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-chronic total occlusion registry

BACKGROUND

An upfront (primary) retrograde strategy is often used in complex chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We examined the clinical, angiographic characteristics, and procedural outcomes of CTO PCIs that were approached with a primary retrograde strategy in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436).

RESULTS

Of 10,286 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2022, a primary retrograde strategy was used in 1329 (13%) with an initial technical success of 66%, and a final success of 83%. Patients who underwent successful versus unsuccessful primary retrograde cases had similar characteristics: age (65 ± 10 vs. 65 ± 9, years, p = 0.203), men (83% vs. 87%, p = 0.066), prior PCI (71% vs. 71%, p = 0.809), and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (52% vs. 53%, p = 0.682). The PROGRESS-CTO score (1.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), air kerma radiation (3.9 ± 2.8 vs. 3.4 ± 2.6, gray, p = 0.013), and contrast use (294 ± 148 ml vs. 248 ± 128, ml, p < 0.001) were higher in the unsuccessful group, whereas the presence of interventional collaterals (95% vs. 72%, p < 0.001) and Werner collateral connection grade 2 (43% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) were higher in the successful group. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only variable associated with a successful primary retrograde strategy was the presence of interventional collaterals: odds ratio: 6.52 (95% confidence intervals; 3.5-12.1, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Presence of interventional collaterals is independently associated with higher success rates with a primary retrograde strategy in CTO PCI.

PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF). Revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone for these patients. Despite this, CABG is performed in a minority of patients with HF, partly due to patient unwillingness or inability to undergo major cardiac surgery and partly due to physician reluctance to refer for surgery due to high operative risk. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive method of revascularization that has the potential to reduce periprocedural complications compared with CABG in patients with HF. Recent advances in PCI technology and technique have made it realistic to achieve more complete revascularization with PCI in high-risk patients with HF, although no randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of PCI in HF compared with either medical therapy or CABG have been performed. In this review, we discuss the currently available evidence for PCI in HF and the association between the extent of revascularization and clinical outcomes in HF. We also review recent advances in PCI technology and techniques with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in HF. Finally, we discuss emerging clinical trial evidence of revascularization in HF and the large, persistent evidence gaps that should be addressed with future clinical trials of revascularization in HF.

Primary versus rescue retrograde approach for chronic total coronary occlusion

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the advantages of using the retrograde approach as an initial strategy rather than as a rescue strategy for complex chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

BACKGROUND

Even for complex CTOs where a retrograde approach is deemed necessary, an antegrade approach is frequently used as an initial strategy in real-world practice.

METHODS

We evaluated 352 retrograde procedures for CTO conducted at our high-volume center between January 2007 and January 2019. Procedural efficiency and safety was assessed based on the guidewire manipulation time (GWMT) and the occurrence of procedure-related adverse events for the primary retrograde approach (PRA) and the rescue retrograde approach (RRA).

RESULTS

PRA and RRA were used in 191 (54.3%) and 161 (45.7%) of the CTO procedures, respectively. The complexity of the CTO lesion was significantly higher in the PRA group than in the RRA group (Japanese-CTO score, 2.62 ± 1.07 vs. 2.38 ± 1.06, p = 0.037). The technical success rate of two groups was similar (p = 0.47). The median GWMT required for PRA was significantly shorter than that for RRA (85 [interquartile range, 55-126] vs. 120 [85-157] min, p < 0.001). The total duration of the procedure and fluoroscopic time were shorter, and the number of guidewires and amount of contrast used during the index procedure were smaller in the PRA group. The incidence of procedure-related adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PRA showed higher procedural efficiency than RRA with comparable safety. Opting for PRA for complex CTOs might be a rational decision to enhance the procedural efficiency.