Mid-term follow-up of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: An experience in Latin America

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: short- and long-term results from a cohort in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

A significant number of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are not eligible for pulmonary endarterectomy and may be treated with balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Although BPA programs have recently been developed in Brazil, no results have yet been published. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and hemodynamic progression of the first patients treated with BPA at our center.

METHODS

This was an observational study of 23 patients with CTEPH enrolled in the BPA program of a specialized center in Brazil between 2015 and 2020.

RESULTS

After a mean of 5.6 ± 1.3 sessions and 11 ± 2.8 treated segments/patient (at a mean of 6.7 ± 2.9 months post-BPA), there was a 26% decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (51 ± 11 vs. 38 ± 11 mmHg; p < 0.0001), a 43% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (10 ± 3.7 vs. 5.7 ± 3.3 WU; p < 0.0001), and a 22.5% increase in the cardiac index (2.38 ± 0.6 vs. 2.95 ± 0.6 L/min/m2; p < 0.0001). There was an increase in the six-minute walk distance and an improvement in functional class. Acute lung injury with clinical manifestations was observed after 7% of the BPA sessions. None of the patients required intubation. During a mean outpatient follow-up period of 38 ± 22 months, two patients were referred for additional BPA sessions due to clinical worsening and new hospitalizations. Two deaths were recorded (due to CTEPH progression and gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among this first group of patients treated with BPA in Brazil, there was significant short- and long-term clinical improvement, together with a low frequency of complications.

Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty continues to gain traction as a treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on pulmonary hypertension now give balloon pulmonary angioplasty a Class 1 recommendation for inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Not surprisingly, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension centers are rapidly initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs. However, we need a comprehensive, expert consensus document outlining critical concepts, including identifying necessary personnel and expertise, criteria for patient selection, and a standardized approach to preprocedural planning and establishing criteria for evaluating procedural efficacy and safety. Given this lack of standards, the balloon pulmonary angioplasty skill set is learned through peer-to-peer contact and training. This document is a state-of-the-art, comprehensive statement from key thought leaders to address this gap in the current clinical practice of balloon pulmonary angioplasty. We summarize the current status of the procedure and provide a consensus opinion on the role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the overall care of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. We also identify knowledge gaps, provide guidance for new centers interested in initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs, and highlight future directions and research needs for this emerging therapy.

Evolving Role and Clinical Evidence in the Global Practice of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) was first described in 2001 and now has evolved into a class I indication for inoperable or residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. This review article aims to describe evidence from studies performed at various pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers across the globe, to better understand the role of BPA in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without PH. Additionally, we hope to highlight innovations and the ever-changing safety and efficacy profile of BPA.

Periprocedural Complications With Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty: Analysis of Global Studies

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) was introduced as a treatment modality for patients with inoperable, medically refractory chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension decades ago; however, reports of high rates of pulmonary vascular injury have led to considerable refinement in procedural technique.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to better understand the evolution of BPA procedure-related complications over time.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic review of original articles published by pulmonary hypertension centers globally and performed a pooled cohort analysis of procedure-related outcomes with BPA.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified 26 published articles from 18 countries worldwide from 2013 to 2022. A total of 1,714 patients underwent 7,561 total BPA procedures with an average follow up of 7.3 months. From the first period (2013-2017) to the second period (2018-2022), the cumulative incidence of hemoptysis/vascular injury decreased from 14.1% (474/3,351) to 7.7% (233/3,029) (P < 0.01); lung injury/reperfusion edema decreased from 11.3% (377/3,351) to 1.4% (57/3,943) (P < 0.01); invasive mechanical ventilation decreased from 0.7% (23/3,195) to 0.1% (4/3,062) (P < 0.01); and mortality decreased from 2.0% (13/636) to 0.8% (8/1,071) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure-related complications with BPA, including hemoptysis/vascular injury, lung injury/reperfusion edema, mechanical ventilation, and death, were less common in the second period (2018-2022), compared with first period (2013-2017), likely from refinement in patient and lesion selection and procedural technique over time.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed from inception to June 2022 to identify studies assessing BPA for CTEPH. Outcomes of interest included the following functional and hemodynamic measures: (a) six-minute walk distance (6MWD), (b) New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, (c) World Health Organization (WHO)-Functional Class status, (d) cardiac index (CI), (e) mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), (f) mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), and (g) pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Subgroup analysis was also performed for BPA in post-pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) patients. All reported BPA-related complications were also recorded. Forty unique studies with a total of 1763 patients were identified for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

All functional and hemodynamic parameters improved significantly following BPA; 6MWD increased 70 m (95% CI 58-82; P < 0.001), NYHA class improved by - 0.9 classes (95% CI - 1.0 to - 0.8; P < 0.001), WHO-FC class improved by - 1 classes ((95% CI - 1.2 to - 0.9; P < 0.001), CI increased 0.26 L/min/m² (95% CI 0.17-0.35; P < 0.001), mPAP decreased - 13.2 mmHg (95% CI - 14.7 to - 11.8; P < 0.001), mRAP decreased - 2.2 mmHg (95% CI - 2.8 to - 1.6; P < 0.001), and PVR decreased - 311 dyne/cm/s^-5 (95% CI - 350 to - 271; P < 0.001). Meta-analysis of patients who underwent BPA for persistent pulmonary hypertension post-PEA demonstrated significant improvements in 6MWD, WHO-FC, PVR and mPAP. Most common complications included lung injury (8.16%), hemoptysis (7.07%) and vessel injury (5.05%).

CONCLUSION

BPA represents a safe and effective treatment option for select individuals with CTEPH with significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters, improved exercise tolerance and a relatively low risk of major complications.

Assessment of Clinical Usefulness of Resting Electrocardiogram (PH-ECG Score) in Monitoring the Efficacy of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (BPA) in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is a form of therapy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The study objective is to assess the clinical usefulness of resting ECG (PH-ECG score) in monitoring the efficacy of BPA in CTEPH patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-four (n = 94) CTEPH patients were included in the analysis. A standard 12-lead-ECG was performed before the first BPA session and after completion of treatment. The whole analysed population (n = 94) was divided into the following two groups: derivation cohort (n = 41) and validation cohort (n = 53). The derivation cohort was divided into the following two subgroups: patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) after the completion of therapy < 25 mmHg (n = 21) and patients with mPAP after the completion of therapy ≥ 25 mmHg (n = 20). In the first subgroup, four (R-wave V1 + S-wave V5/V6 > 10.5 mm, QRS-wave axis > 110 degrees, R-wave V1 > S-wave V1, SIQIII pattern) of the six ECG parameters of overload of the right cardiac chambers showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.005). That was followed by a determination of the sensitivity and specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and ROC curve (AUC 0.9; 95% CI: 0.792-1.000) for the variable that was a sum of the above four ECG parameters (PH-ECG score). The absence of all of the four ECG parameters at rest (PH-ECG score = 0) well reflected patients with mPAP < 25 mmHg (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 80%; PPV, 84%; NPV, 100%). In the validation cohort with mPAP < 25 mmHg and PH-ECG score = 0, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 86%, 77%, 73%, and 89%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Resting ECG trace is clinically useful in the monitoring of therapeutical effects of BPA in CTEPH patients.