Predictors of success in primary retrograde strategy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-chronic total occlusion registry

Retrograde Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (JR-CTO) Score: From the Japanese CTO-PCI Expert Registry

BACKGROUND

Despite the effectiveness of the retrograde approach for chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, there are no standardized tools to predict the success of retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a prediction tool to identify CTO lesions that will achieve successful retrograde PCI.

METHODS

This study evaluated data from 2,374 patients who underwent primary retrograde CTO-PCI and were enrolled in the Japanese CTO-PCI Expert Registry between January 2016 and December 2022 (NCT01889459). All observations were randomly assigned to the derivation and validation cohorts at a 2:1 ratio. The prediction score for guidewire failure in retrograde CTO-PCI was determined by assigning 1 point for each factor and summing all accrued points.

RESULTS

The JR-CTO score (moderate-severe calcification, tortuosity, Werner collateral connection grade ≤1, and nonseptal collateral channel) demonstrated a C-statistic for guidewire failure of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.76) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.77) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Patients with lower scores had higher guidewire and technical success rates and decreased guidewire crossing time and procedural time (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The JR-CTO (Japanese Retrograde Chronic Total Occlusion) score, a simple 4-item score that predicts successful guidewire crossing in patients undergoing retrograde CTO-PCI, has the potential to support clinical decision-making for the retrograde approach.

The added value of coronary CTA in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically investigate and summarize the utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in the management of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The authors searched the four databases between 2005 and 2023 for studies investigating the role of CCTA and invasive coronary angiograms (ICA) images when used as the pre-procedural tool for CTO-PCI. Efficacy and safety of CCTA in CTO-PCI treatment as a pre-procedural assessment tool was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were finally chosen for this systematic review. CCTA had a high degree of agreement with ICA when applied for J-CTO scoring system. A J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score > 3, together with calcification, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, and bending > 45° were shared imaging risk factors on both ICA and CCTA for technique failure and guidewire crossing over 30 min. Additionally, negative remodeling and multiple diseased vessel were significant indicators on CCTA. Although patients with pre-procedural CCTA showed a trend of higher success rate and easier guidewire crossing, and CCTA showed a slightly higher predictive accuracy for process success, no significant improvement in post-PCI major adverse cardiac events of using CCTA for assessment has been achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA is a safe and effective pre-operative tool of CTO-PCI. Except for the shared imaging risk factors with ICA for a hard CTO-PCI including calcification, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, bending > 45°, and J-CTO score > 3, factors like negative remodeling and multiple diseased vessel were also recognized as significant pre-operative assessment indicators on CCTA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A pre-procedural assessment based on coronary computed tomographic angiography has the potential to aid in the management of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

KEY POINTS

• A coronary computed tomographic angiography-based pre-procedural assessment can help chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention management. • The recognized high-risk features detected via coronary computed tomographic angiography and invasive coronary angiograms are comparable in detecting difficult lesions and chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention failure. • Coronary computed tomographic angiography has an additional value to be a safe and effective pre-procedural assessment tool for chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention.

Applicability of J-CTO channel score to predict microcatheter tracking during retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: Insights from the SURFING MICRO registry

BACKGROUND

The J-chronic total occlusion (CTO) channel score can predict guidewire tracking of the collateral channels (CCs), but its efficacy in predicting microcatheter tracking has never been tested in the setting of retrograde CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIMS

Predicting microcatheter collateral tracking during retrograde CTO-PCIs.

METHODS

A total of 189 patients undergoing retrograde CTO-PCI from April 2017 to August 2021 were screened. The primary outcome of interest was a correlation between J-CTO channel score and microcatheter tracking failure (MTF) after successful CC tracking by the guidewire. The independent association between anatomical features of the J-CTO channel score and the primary outcome of interest was explored.

RESULTS

After adjustment, only small size (adjusted OR: 12.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-89.82; p = 0.01) and continuous bends (adjusted OR: 14.15, 95% CI: 2.77-72.34; p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with an increased risk of MTF for septal collaterals. The small size was the only predictor of the MTF for epicardial collaterals (OR: 6.39, 95% CI: 1.13-35.96; p = 0.020) at univariate analysis. Patients in the MTF group had a lower incidence of procedural success compared with patients in the microcatheter tracking success (MTS) group (40.0% vs. 93.9%, p < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of collateral perforations (20.0% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Small and tortuous septal collaterals, identified by a score ≥3, are associated with an increased risk of MTF, lower incidence of procedural success, and higher risk of procedural complications driven by collateral perforations.

Collateral grading systems in retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Channel (J-Channel) score was introduced to aid in retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTOs). The predictive value of the J-Channel score has not been compared with established collateral grading systems such as the Rentrop classification and Werner grade.

AIMS

To investigate the predictive value of the J-Channel score, Rentrop classification and Werner grade for successful collateral channel (CC) guidewire crossing and technical CTO PCI success.

METHODS

A total of 600 prospectively recruited patients underwent CTO PCI. All grading systems were assessed under dual catheter injection. CC guidewire crossing was considered successful if the guidewire reached the distal segment of the CTO vessel through a retrograde approach. Technical CTO PCI success was defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 and residual stenosis <30%.

RESULTS

Of 600 patients, 257 (43%) underwent CTO PCI through a retrograde approach. Successful CC guidewire crossing was achieved in 208 (81%) patients. The predictive value of the J-Channel score for CC guidewire crossing (area under curve 0.743) was comparable with the Rentrop classification (0.699, p = 0.094) and superior to the Werner grade (0.663, p = 0.002). Technical CTO PCI success was reported in 232 (90%) patients. The Rentrop classification exhibited a numerically higher discriminatory ability (0.676) compared to the J-Channel score (0.664) and Werner grade (0.589).

CONCLUSIONS

The J-channel score might aid in strategic collateral channel selection during retrograde CTO PCI. However, the J-Channel score, Rentrop classification, and Werner grade have limited value in predicting technical CTO PCI success.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion-Contemporary Approach and Future Directions

In the aging society, the issue of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has become a challenge for invasive cardiologists. Despite the lack of clear indications in European and American guidelines, the rates of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for CTO increased over the last years. Well-conducted randomized clinical trials (RCT) and large observational studies brought significant and substantial progress in many CTO blind spots. However, the results regarding the rationale behind revascularization and the long-term benefit of CTO are inconclusive. Knowing the uncertainties regarding PCI CTO, our work sought to sum up and provide a comprehensive review of the latest evidence on percutaneous recanalization of coronary artery chronic total occlusion.

Impact of proximal cap ambiguity on the procedural techniques and outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO Registry

BACKGROUND

Proximal cap ambiguity is a key parameter in the global chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) crossing algorithm.

METHODS

We examined the baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes of 9718 CTO PCIs performed in 9498 patients at 41 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2022.

RESULTS

Proximal cap ambiguity was present in 35% of CTO lesions. Patients whose lesions had proximal cap ambiguity were more likely to have had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (37% vs. 24%; p < 0.001). Lesions with proximal cap ambiguity were more complex with higher J-CTO score (3.1 ± 1.0 vs. 2.0 ± 1.2; p < 0.001) and lower technical (79% vs. 90%; p < 0.001) and procedural (77% vs. 89%; p < 0.001) success rates compared with nonambiguous CTO lesions. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was higher in cases with proximal cap ambiguity (2.5% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.001). The retrograde approach was more commonly used among cases with ambiguous proximal cap (50% vs. 21%; p < 0.001) and was more likely to be the final successful crossing strategy (29% vs. 13%; p < 0.001). The antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) "move-the-cap" techniques were also more common among cases with proximal cap ambiguity.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal cap ambiguity in CTO lesions is associated with higher utilization of the retrograde approach and ADR, lower technical and procedural success rates, and higher incidence of in-hospital MACE.