Platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel in patients treated with omeprazole, pantoprazole, and famotidine: a prospective, randomized, crossover study

Potential drug-drug interactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases: findings from a prospective observational study

Background

Patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are at high risk of experiencing drug–drug interactions (DDIs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency, level and risk factors associated with potential-DDIs (pDDIs) in hospitalized CVD patients at cardiology departments of two tertiary care hospitals in Quetta, Pakistan.

Methods

In the current prospective observational study, a total of 300 eligible CVD inpatients were evaluated for pDDIs using Lexicomp Interact®. The pDDIs were classified into class A (no known interaction); B (no action needed); C (monitor therapy: it is documented that the benefits of an interaction outweigh the risk, appropriately monitor therapy in order to avoid potential adverse outcomes); D (consider therapy modification: it is documented that proper actions must be taken to reduce the toxicity resulting from an interaction); X (avoid combination: the risk of an interaction outweighs the benefits and are usually contraindicated). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to find factors associated with the presence of Class-D and/or X pDDIs. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

With a median of 8.50 pDDIs per patient, all patients (100%) had ≥ 1 pDDIs. Out of total 2787 pDDIs observed, 74.06% (n = 2064) were of moderate and (n = 483) 17.33% of major severity. Class C pDDIs were most common (n = 1971, 70.72%) followed by D (n = 582, 20.88%), B (n = 204, 7.32%) and X (n = 30, 1.08%). Suffering from cardiovascular diseases other than myocardial infarction (OR 0.053, p-value < 0.001) and receiving > 12 drugs (OR 4.187, p-value = 0.009) had statistical significant association with the presence of class D and/or X pDDIs.

Conclusion

In the current study, pDDIs were highly prevalent. The inclusion of DDI screening tools, availability of clinical pharmacists and paying special attention to the high-risk patients may reduce the frequency of pDDIs at the study sites.

Different Clopidogrel Response Elicited by Lansoprazole or Esomeprazole in Patients Undergoing Neurointervention with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy and a proton-pump inhibitor are used worldwide to prevent thromboembolism and peptic ulceration in patients undergoing neurointervention. We performed VerifyNow assays (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) to retrospectively examine the relationship between the effectiveness of antiplatelet agents and different proton-pump inhibitor types.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm scheduled for neurointervention received aspirin-clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy plus the proton-pump inhibitor lansoprazole (n = 34) or esomeprazole (n = 30). A low response to aspirin and clopidogrel was defined in terms of aspirin reaction units > 550 and P2Y12 reaction units ≥ 230, respectively, by VerifyNow assay. The characteristics, response to antiplatelet therapy, and clinical outcomes were compared in patients treated with lansoprazole or esomeprazole.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean VerifyNow aspirin reaction units and P2Y12 reaction units were 466.0 ± 67.3 and 205.0 ± 67.6, respectively. The mean aspirin reaction unit value was 482.0 ± 64.1 in the lansoprazole group, and 461.5 ± 70.9 in the esomeprazole group (p = 0.77). The mean P2Y12 reaction unit was 220.0 ± 64.4 in the lansoprazole group, and 174.5 ± 65.0 in the esomeprazole group; there was a significant difference in the clopidogrel response of patient treated with lansoprazole or esomeprazole (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our VerifyNow assay results suggest that when on lansoprazole fewer patients achieved the therapeutic goal and required extra therapy before neurointervention.

Effectiveness and Safety of Clopidogrel Co-administered With Statins and Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Korean National Health Insurance Database Study

Simultaneous competition for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and CYP3A4 might diminish clopidogrel's antiplatelet effect by impacting its metabolic activation. This pharmacoepidemiologic study investigated whether proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and CYP3A4-metabolized statins individually and jointly increase thrombotic events by attenuating clopidogrel's effectiveness. From Korean nationwide claims data (2007-2015), we selected 59,233 patients who initiated clopidogrel and statins after coronary stenting and compared thrombotic risks by PPI or CYP3A4-metabolized statin use or both. PPIs were associated with increased thrombotic risks (hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.45), unlike CYP3A4-metabolized statins (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07). PPIs with high CYP2C19-inhibitory potential were more relevant than those with low potential (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61). Joint effects of PPIs and CYP3A4-metabolized statins were nonsignificant (relative excess risk due to interaction -0.14, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.07). Concurrent PPIs were associated with increased thrombotic risks in patients receiving clopidogrel and statins; CYP3A4-metabolized statins did not exacerbate PPI-associated risks.

Associations Between PFA-Measured Aspirin Resistance, Platelet Count, Renal Function, and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

Aspirin resistance is used to describe patients who are undergoing aspirin therapy but fail for the inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis in platelets. Although the true mechanism is unclear, drug–drug interaction remains a possible factor. The study aimed to determine whether there was association between aspirin resistance and the concomitant cardiovascular medication. Using the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 system, aspirin resistance was evaluated in aspirin-treated patients from the outpatient department. The associations between aspirin resistance and their concomitant common cardiovascular medication were analyzed. Aspirin resistance was prevalent in 147 (17.7%) of 831 patients. Concomitant angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment and low platelet count were associated with aspirin response (P = .04, .02, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed an association between aspirin response and ARB therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.08-2.18). And the association was blunted when platelet count was considered (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.92-2.23). In ARB-treated patients, increased creatinine and decreased hematocrit laboratory data increased the risk of aspirin resistance (P = .02, .04, respectively), and the effect of platelet count on aspirin resistance was diminished by ARB therapy. Concomitant ARB treatment in aspirin-treated patients decreased the risk of aspirin resistance, and the effect was dependent on low platelet count. In ARB-treated patients, increased creatinine and decreased hematocrit data increased the risk of aspirin resistance. In addition, the effect of platelet count on aspirin resistance was diminished by ARB treatment.

Pantoprazole-induced acute kidney injury: A case report

The present study reports a case of pantoprazole-induced acute kidney disease. The patient was diagnosed with acute kidney injury with wide interstitial inflammation and eosinophil infiltration. Following 1 month of glucocorticoid therapy, the patient's serum creatinine and urea nitrogen decreased to within normal ranges. The presentation, clinical course, diagnosis and prognosis of pantoprazole-induced acute kidney injury are discussed herein to highlight the importance of early and correct diagnosis for good prognosis. Disease characteristics include short-term increased serum creatinine levels that respond to glucocorticoid treatment. The patient had no history of chronic kidney disease or proteinuria and presented with increased serum creatinine following treatment with pantoprazole. Following the end of pantoprazole treatment, short-term RRT and long-term prednisolone was administered, then serum creatinine returned to normal. Pantoprazole-induced acute kidney injury is commonly misdiagnosed and late diagnosis results in poor patient prognoses. Misdiagnosis leads to the administration of treatments that may exacerbate the condition, so appropriate diagnosis and treatment for pantoprazole-induced acute kidney injury is necessary.

Prior chronic clopidogrel therapy is associated with increased adverse events and early stent thrombosis

Despite the growing use of clopidogrel, limited data exist regarding the prognostic significance of chronic clopidogrel therapy in patients sustaining acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to determine whether patients sustaining ACS while on chronic clopidogrel therapy have a worse prognosis than clopidogrel-naïve patients. A total of 5,386 consecutive ACS patients were prospectively characterised and followed-up for 30 days. Of them, 680 (13 %) were treated with clopidogrel prior to the index ACS. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as death, recurrent ACS, stroke and/or stent thrombosis. Compared with clopidogrel-naïve, chronic clopidogrel-treated patients were older (66 ± 12 vs 63 ± 13, respectively; p< 0.01), suffered more from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, prior cardiovascular history, including prior myocardial infarction, revascularisation, coronary artery bypass graft and stroke (p< 0.01 for all), and were less likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (21 % vs 45 %; respectively; p < 0.001). Prior clopidogrel therapy was associated with a two-fold increase in in-hospital (1.6 °% vs 0.6, respectively; p =0.006) as well as 30-day stent thrombosis (2.2 % vs 1.0 %, respectively; p=0.007). MACE at 30 days was also higher among chronic clopidogrel-treated compared with clopidogrel-naïve patients [12.3 % vs 9.4 %, respectively; p< 0.01]. In multivariate log regression analysis chronic clopidogrel treatment was an independent predictor of stent thrombosis [OR=2.6 (95 %CI 1.2–5.6), p=0.001]. Patients sustaining ACS while on chronic clopidogrel treatment are at higher risk for in-hospital and 30-day adverse outcomes, including stent thrombosis.

Comparative Study of Effects of Vonoprazan and Esomeprazole on Antiplatelet Function of Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in Relation to CYP2C19 Genotype

Drug-drug interaction between antiacid and antiplatelet agents has not been fully elucidated. Vonoprazan, a new potassium competitive acid blocker, has been available in Japan. CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 are involved in the metabolism of clopidogrel, prasugrel, esomeprazole, and vonoprazan. Using a P2Y12 assay, we compared the effects of vonoprazan and esomeprazole on the antiplatelet functions of clopidogrel or prasugrel in 31 healthy Japanese volunteers (14 CYP2C19 homo-extensive (homo-EMs), nine hetero-extensive (hetero-EMs), and eight poor metabolizers (PMs)). Vonoprazan decreased the median inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) values of clopidogrel and prasugrel more potently than esomeprazole (P < 0.001 for clopidogrel and P = 0.011 for prasugrel). The same tendencies were observed when stratified by CYP2C19 genotype groups (P = 0.004 in homo-EMs, 0.033 in hetero-EMs, and 0.043 in PMs). Vonoprazan attenuated the antiplatelet function of clopidogrel more potently than esomeprazole. Esomeprazole did not affect that of prasugrel irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype.

Incompatible intravenous drug combinations and respective physician and nurse knowledge: a study in routine paediatric intensive care

Objectives

To identify incompatible intravenous drug combinations in routine paediatric intensive care and evaluate physician and nurse knowledge.

Methods

In a university paediatric intensive care unit, intravenous drug incompatibilities were analysed using a database and physician and nurse knowledge of incompatibilities was assessed using a questionnaire.

Results

We analysed 665 prescriptions in 87 patients. Incompatible drug administration was identified in 9 (10%) of the 87 patients with a median of 3 different incompatibilities per patient (Q25/Q75: 1/3). We found 26 incompatible combinations. The most frequently involved drugs were cefotaxime, pantoprazole and vancomycin. A median of 10 of the 15 drug combinations were correctly assessed as compatible or incompatible (Q25/Q75: 8/11). Pantoprazole had a low number (20%) of correct answers.

Conclusions

One in 10 patients in paediatric intensive care was affected by drug incompatibility, with knowledge deficits seen in a third of assessed combinations. This indicates quality improvement strategies should be urgently implemented by pharmacists.

The Safety of Appropriate Use of Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evidence-Based Review and Delphi Consensus

The availability of over-the-counter (OTC) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the short-term (2 weeks) management of frequent heartburn (≥2 days/week) has increased markedly, yet evidence-based recommendations have not been developed. A panel of nine international experts in gastroesophageal reflux disease developed consensus statements regarding the risks and benefits of OTC PPIs using a modified Delphi process. Consensus (based on ≥80% approval) was reached through multiple rounds of remote voting and a final round of live voting. To identify relevant data, the available literature was searched and summarized. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system terminology was used to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations; consensus was based on ≥2/3 agreement. After 4 rounds of review, consensus was achieved for 18 statements. Notably, the available data did not directly reflect OTC use, but instead, prescription use; therefore, extrapolations to the OTC setting were often necessary. This limitation is regrettable, but it justifies performing this exercise to provide evidence-based expert opinion on a widely used class of drugs. The panel determined that using OTC PPIs according to label instructions is unlikely to mask the symptoms of esophageal or gastric cancer or adversely impact the natural history of related precursor conditions. OTC PPIs are not expected to substantially affect micronutrient absorption or bone mineral density or cause community-acquired pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, or cardiovascular adverse events. However, OTC PPI use may be associated with slightly increased risks for infectious diarrhea, certain idiosyncratic reactions, and cirrhosis-related spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The available evidence does not suggest that OTC PPI use consistent with label instructions is associated with substantial health risks. To minimize potential risks, healthcare professionals and consumers must actively participate in decision making when managing reflux-related symptoms in the self-care setting.

Clopidogrel-Proton Pump Inhibitor Drug-Drug Interaction and Risk of Adverse Clinical Outcomes Among PCI-Treated ACS Patients: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty regarding clopidogrel effectiveness attenuation because of a drug-drug interaction with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has led to conflicting guidelines on concomitant therapy. In particular, the effect of this interaction in patients who undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a population known to have increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, has not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the evidence of the effect of clopidogrel-PPI drug interaction on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in a PCI patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review for studies reporting clinical outcomes in patients who underwent a PCI and were initiated on clopidogrel with or without a PPI. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported at least 1 of the clinical outcomes of interest (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE], cardiovascular death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and bleed events). We excluded studies that were not exclusive to PCI patients or had no PCI subgroup analysis and/or did not report at least a 6-month follow-up. Statistical and clinical heterogeneity were evaluated and HRs and 95% CIs for adverse clinical events were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects meta-analysis method.

RESULTS

We identified 12 studies comprising 50,277 PCI patients that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our analysis included retrospective analyses of randomized controlled trials (2), health registries (3), claims databases (2), and institutional records (5); no prospective studies of PCI patients were identified. On average, patients were in their mid-60s, male, and had an array of comorbidities, including hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking history. Concomitant therapy following PCI resulted in statistically significant increases in composite MACE (HR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.24-1.32), myocardial infarction (HR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.40-1.62), and stroke (HR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.15-1.86). However, concomitant therapy had no statistically significant effect on stent thrombosis, mortality measured by all-cause or cardiovascular death, or major bleeding before or after the grouping of studies that reported a major or minor bleed outcome. Only 1 study reported on gastrointestinal bleed, and pooled analysis could not be conducted. Statistical testing suggested heterogeneity among studies, but subgroup analysis did not reveal a clear source.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results from this meta-analysis of retrospective analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies, concomitant clopidogrel-PPI therapy following PCI appears to be significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Further research on the effect of individual PPIs is needed.

DISCLOSURES

Serbin, Guzauskas, and Veenstra were supported by the NIH Common Fund and NIA (1U01AG047109-01, Veenstra, PI) via the Personalized Medicine Economics Research (PriMER) project. The authors do not report any conflicting interests. All authors contributed to the study concept and design. Serbin took the lead in data collection; data interpretation was performed primarily by Serbin, with assistance from the other authors. The manuscript was written primarily by Serbin, along with Guzauskas, and revised by Guzauskas and Veenstra, with assistance from Serbin.

Comparison of prophylactic effect of UGIB and effects on platelet function between PPIs and H2RAs combined with DAPT: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

We compared prophylactic effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H₂RAs) on upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) associated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and explored this influence on platelet function.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing PPIs with H₂RAs in adults receiving DAPT were collected from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain risk ratios (RRs) for UGIB, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), poor responders to clopidogrel and rehospitalization, and continuous data were pooled to obtain mean differences (MDs) for P2Y₁₂ reaction units (PRUs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Twelve clinical trials (n=3,301) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to H₂RAs, PPIs lessened UGIB (RR =0.16, 95% CI: 0.03–0.70), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of PRUs (MD =18.21 PRUs, 95% CI: −4.11–40.54), poor responders to clopidogrel (RR =1.21, 95% CI: 0.92–1.61), incidence of MACEs (RR =0.89, 95% CI: 0.45–1.75) or rehospitalization (RR =1.76, 95% CI: 0.79–3.92). Subgroup analysis confirmed fewer PRUs in the H₂RAs group compared to the omeprazole group (2 studies, n=189, MD =31.80 PRUs, 95% CI: 11.65–51.96). However, poor responder data for clopidogrel and MACEs might be unreliable because few studies of this kind were included.

Conclusion

Limited evidence indicates that PPIs were better than H₂RAs for prophylaxis of UGIB associated with DAPT and had no effect on platelet function. Further study is needed to confirm these observations.

Risk of gastric cancer, gastrointestinal cancers and other cancers: a comparison of treatment with pantoprazole and other proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to be carcinogenic in rodent studies.

AIM

As part of a long-term post-marketing surveillance study requested by the US Food and Drug Administration, to compare incidence rates of gastric and other cancers after sustained exposures to pantoprazole, a long-acting PPI, compared with other shorter acting PPIs.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study within the membership of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system and compared rates of gastric and other cancers among pantoprazole users and users of other PPI medications. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for potential confounders such as sex, age, receipt of treatment for Helicobacter pylori, cumulative PPI dose, total years PPI treatment and year of index date. The study was developed in consultation with, and approved by, the FDA.

RESULTS

A total of 61 684 persons with at least a 240-day supply of medication (34 178 pantoprazole and 27 686 other PPIs) were followed up for a total of 547 020 person-years (274 700 vs. 272 321 person-years, respectively). The primary analyses demonstrated comparable risks between the pantoprazole and other PPI groups for gastric cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% CI 0.24-1.93); colorectal, liver, pancreatic, or small bowel cancers (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.65-1.40) or any cancer (HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.93-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that pantoprazole, a longer acting PPI, compared with shorter-acting agents, conferred an excess risk of gastric cancer, other gastrointestinal cancers or all cancers for pantoprazole compared with other shorter-acting PPIs.

Efficacy of Clopidogrel and Clinical Outcome When Clopidogrel Is Coadministered With Atorvastatin and Lansoprazole: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

This prospective, randomized, nonblind, controlled trial evaluated the effects of clopidogrel on platelet function upon coadministration with atorvastatin and lansoprazole. One hundred four adult patients with non-ST-segment elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent implantation were included. All patients were treated with standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) plus rosuvastatin 10  mg daily after the operation. On the sixth day after PCI, patients were randomly divided into 4 groups, Group A: DAPT + atorvastatin 20  mg daily (a change from rosuvastatin to atorvastatin) + lansoprazole 30  mg daily, Group B: DAPT + atorvastatin 20  mg daily (a change from rosuvastatin to atorvastatin), Group C: DAPT + lansoprazole 30  mg daily (continuing to take rosuvastatin), Group D is the control group. Additional drugs were used according to the situation of patients. Platelet function and concentrations of platelet activation markers (granular membrane protein 140 (P-selectin), thromboxane B2 (TXB2), and human soluble cluster of differentiation 40 ligand (sCD40L)) were assessed before randomization and at 15- and 30-day follow-up visits. All patients were maintained on treatment for 6 months and observed for bleeding and ischemic events. A total of 104 patients were enrolled, 27 patients in group A, 26 patients in Group B/C, 25 patients in Group D separately, and all the patients were analyzed. There were no differences in platelet function and the levels of platelet activation markers (P-selectin, TXB2, and sCD40L) among or within the 4 groups at the 3 time points of interest (P > 0.05). In the subsequent 6 months, no significant bleeding events occurred, and 12 patients experienced ischemic events, these results were also not significantly different among the groups (P > 0.05). In patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS who have had drug-eluting stent implantation, simultaneously administering clopidogrel, atorvastatin, and lansoprazole did not decrease the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel or increase adverse event frequency over 6 months.

Concomitant proton-pump inhibitor use, platelet activity, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel and managed without revascularization: insights from the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes trial

Concomitant use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been implicated in diminished antiplatelet response to clopidogrel and an increased risk of ischemic events, but primarily among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to examine the potential influence of interactions between PPIs and clopidogrel versus prasugrel on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients managed medically without revascularization.

METHODS

This analysis from the TRILOGY ACS trial focused upon the 7,243 ACS patients aged <75 years who were managed without revascularization, randomized to clopidogrel or prasugrel, and followed for a median of 17 months. Proton-pump inhibitor type and use were assessed at each study visit, and 2,049 of the patients in this cohort underwent serial platelet reactivity assessments.

RESULTS

Proton-pump inhibitor use (23%) was similar between the clopidogrel and prasugrel groups at baseline and throughout the study. Median on-treatment platelet reactivity values were consistently lower with prasugrel versus clopidogrel irrespective of PPI use. For the primary end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke), PPI use modified the unadjusted treatment effect of prasugrel versus clopidogrel (interaction P = .02). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, this treatment effect modification was attenuated for the composite end point (interaction P = .06) but was significant for the MI component end point (interaction P = .01). Similarly, among patients on a PPI, the frequency of MI was significantly lower with prasugrel versus clopidogrel (hazard ratio = 0.61; 95% CI 0.42-0.88). These findings were similar by PPI type (omeprazole and pantoprazole).

CONCLUSIONS

Among ACS patients managed without revascularization, use of PPIs did not result in a differential antiplatelet response between prasugrel versus clopidogrel but was associated with a lower incidence of MI with prasugrel. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that factors besides platelet reactivity may underlie the differential risk of MI observed by treatment assignment with PPI use.

PPI versus Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonists for Prevention of Upper Gastrointestinal Injury Associated with Low-Dose Aspirin: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This study compared proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) for prevention of low-dose aspirin (LDA)-related gastrointestinal (GI) erosion, ulcer and bleeding. Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and WanFang Data were searched from the date of their establishment to December 31, 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing PPIs and H2RAs for prevention of GI injury associated with low-dose aspirin (LDA) were collected. Two reviewers independently abstracted studies and patient characteristics and appraised study quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. We included nine RCTs involving 1047 patients. The meta-analysis showed that PPIs were superior to H2RAs for prevention of LDA-associated GI erosion/ulcer [odds ratio (OR=0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.50] and bleeding (OR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.59). In conclusion, PPIs were superior to H2RAs for prevention of LDA-related GI erosion/ulcer and bleeding. Higher quality, large, multicenter RCTs are needed to demonstrate the preventive effect of the two acid-suppressive drugs.

Cardiovascular Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenomics for the Clinical Practitioner

Current clinical cardiovascular practice requires a clinician to have a strong foundation in multiple aspects of pharmacology. Modern cardiovascular regimens are complex, and optimal management, application of evolving guidelines, and adoption of new therapies build off a more basic understanding of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In addition, it is likely time to add a third pillar into this discussion, the expanding field of pharmacogenomics referring to the genetic influences on drug response. This field has increasing applications in medicine and clearly holds significant promise for cardiovascular disease management. Awareness of pharmacogenomic advances and the fundamentals of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics can help the clinician more easily deliver great care. Here we attempt to briefly summarize and simplify key concepts of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics relevant to the cardiovascular disease practitioner.

Drugs that interact with levothyroxine: an observational study from the Thyroid Epidemiology, Audit and Research Study (TEARS)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the extent of drug interactions affecting levothyroxine, using study drugs often co-administered to patients on long-term levothyroxine therapy.

DESIGN

A retrospective population analysis linking biochemistry and prescription data between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2012 was used.

PATIENTS

The study population was Tayside residents prescribed levothyroxine on at least three occasions, within a six-month period, prior to the start of a study drug. Individuals acted as their own controls pre- and postinitiation of study drug. Overall, 10 999 patients (mean age 58 years, 82% female) being treated with thyroxine were included in the study.

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in TSH following initiation of study drug.

RESULTS

Iron, calcium, proton pump inhibitors and oestrogen all increased serum TSH concentration: an increase of 0·22 mU/l (P < 0.001), 0·27 mU/l (P < 0·001), 0·12 mU/l (P < 0·01), and 0·08 mU/l (P < 0·007), respectively. For these four study drugs, there was a clinically significant increase of over 5 mU/l in serum TSH, in 7·5%, 4·4%, 5·6% and 4·3% patients, respectively. There was a decrease of 0·17 mU/l (P-value 0.01) in the TSH concentration for those patients on statins. The TSH decreased by 5 mU/l in 3·7% of patients. There was no effect with H2 receptor antagonists or glucocorticoids.

CONCLUSION

This large population-based study demonstrates significant interaction between levothyroxine and iron, calcium, proton pump inhibitors, statins and oestrogens. These drugs may reduce the effectiveness of levothyroxine, and patients' TSH concentrations should be carefully monitored.

Genotype- and phenotype-directed antiplatelet therapy selection in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been a standard treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for over a decade, only recently have therapeutic options beyond aspirin and clopidogrel become available. Additional treatment options are particularly useful because of the documented history of variability in antiplatelet response. This article reviews the current treatment options for DAPT in ACS, and reviews both genotype- and phenotype-guided methods for determining optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients with ACS. Additionally, recommendations from current guidelines as well as expert commentary are provided for the use of available testing methods to determine optimal DAPT for ACS patients.

PA32540 for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients at risk for aspirin-associated gastric ulcers

Prescribed in patients with a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, coronary intervention or bypass surgery, aspirin is one of the medications most commonly used in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. It has become a mainstay of therapy after years of solid evidence supporting its efficacy in clinical trials. However, a number of risks and side effects accompany its benefits, including the notable risk of bleeding and gastrointestinal side effects. Numerous mechanisms have been proposed to attenuate these effects to promote adherence and to expand the population for which aspirin is a reasonable treatment option. A polypill or combination formulation that includes a proton pump inhibitor, a drug commonly prescribed alongside aspirin, is one potential avenue of therapy. One such combination pill, PA32540, has undergone Phase I and Phase III trials and shows promising safety and efficacy results in these preliminary trials.

Point-of-care platelet reactivity determination with VerifyNow-P2Y12 following administration of clopidogrel or prasugrel: data from a real-world, clinical care inpatient setting

OBJECTIVES

To describe VerifyNow-P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12, Accumetrics, San Diego, CA) results from patients treated with either clopidogrel or prasugrel who were seeking care in a hospital setting.

BACKGROUND

VN-P2Y12 is a point-of-care device that measures platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. Past assessments of thienopyridine therapy utilizing VN-P2Y12 have largely come from clinical trial settings. There are limited data from real-world settings.

METHODS

Electronic medical record data from Huntsville Hospital (Huntsville, AL) for those who underwent VN-P2Y12 testing for clopidogrel or prasugrel between January 1, 2009 and October 31, 2010 were analyzed. The VN-P2Y12 data included P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) and device-reported percentage of inhibition. Descriptive analyses were conducted with t tests, and a logistic regression model was estimated to assess the association between patient characteristics and the likelihood of platelet nonresponse.

RESULTS

In total, 2882 tests (2476 with clopidogrel and 406 with prasugrel) were analyzed. For clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively, mean PRU standard deviation (SD) was 206 (90) and 107 (93; P < 0.0001) and mean % inhibition (SD) was 31% (26%) and 63% (31%; P < 0.0001). Treatment with clopidogrel alone (odds ratio [OR] = 5.25; P < 0.0001), being non-Caucasian (OR = 1.48; P = 0.0440), obese (OR = 1.49; P = 0.0010), anemic (OR = 3.29; P < 0.0001), diabetic (OR = 1.75; P < 0.0001), and having a history of myocardial infarction (OR = 1.57; P < 0.0001) were significant predictors of having PRU ≥ 235.

CONCLUSION

This real-world data analysis shows results that are consistent with clinical trial results, namely that compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel is associated with significantly lower PRU and greater percentage of inhibition, regardless of age, race, gender, diabetes, obesity, or proton pump inhibitor use.

Hyperglycemia in patients referred for cardiac catheterization is associated with preexisting diabetes rather than a stress-related phenomenon: a prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

An increased serum glucose level in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with adverse clinical outcome. This hyperglycemia has been attributed, at least in part, to acute stress reaction. Our objective was to determine whether hyperglycemia is a stress-related phenomenon or whether it represents a more sustained and possibly significant background dysglycemia.

HYPOTHESIS

Hyperglycemia in patients undergoing coronary angiography is related to background dysglycemia.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained at the time of cardiac catheterization. Patients with hemoglobin A1c >6.5% were excluded to avoid patients with chronic glucose levels above 135 mg/dL. A logistic regression model was created to assess the influence of different variables on hyperglycemia (glucose levels above 140 mg/dL). We also evaluated the effect of glucose levels above 140 mg/dL on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) up to 36 months.

RESULTS

There were 2554 consecutive patients prospectively recruited. Serum glucose levels above 140 mg/dL was a strong predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-3.6, P = 0.002). Both diabetes mellitus and ACS were associated with hyperglycemia (glucose levels above 140 mg/dL). Nevertheless, the incidence of hyperglycemia was doubled in diabetic patients (odds ratio [OR]: 9.4, 95% CI: 3.9-22.4, P < 0.001) compared with patients with ACS (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 2.3-9.0, P < 0.001). Combining both conditions was associated with a high likelihood of elevated glucose levels (OR: 15.5, 95% CI: 7.4-32.9, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycemia in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization is a strong predictor of adverse outcome. It is mainly related to background dysglycemia and to a lesser extent to the acute stress accompanying ACS.

Proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can bind to the proton pump and inhibit it to secrete hydrogen ions. Since currently used PPIs have a short plasma half-life and can interact with other drugs, there is still an urgent need to develop new and interesting PPIs that can overcome these problems. This review summarizes the latest progress in research of PPIs with regard to the mechanism of action, side effects, and interactions with other drugs and provides an update of the status of acid-suppression therapy.