Quality of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes as a function of hospital revascularization capability: Insights from get with the guidelines-CAD

The Rationale and Design of the KOSovan Acute Coronary Syndrome (KOS-ACS) Registry

The KOSovan Acute Coronary Syndrome (KOS-ACS) Registry is established as a prospective, continuous, nationwide, web-based registry that is operated online. The KOS-ACS registry is designed with the following objectives: (1) to obtain data on the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of ACS patients treated in Kosovo; (2) to create a national database with information on health care in ACS patients treated in Kosovo; (3) to identify the national features of associations between ACS characteristics and clinical outcomes, including mortality, complications, the length of hospital stay, and the quality of clinical care; and (4) to propose a practical guide for improving the quality and efficiency of ACS treatment in Kosovo. The Kosovo Society of Cardiology and University of Prishtina will be responsible for the development of the KOS-ACS registry and centralized data analysis at the national level. The KOS-ACS Registry will enroll all patients admitted, at any of the registered clinical centers, with the diagnosis of ACS and who will be clinically managed at any of the Kosovo hospitals. Data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, previous and hospital drug treatment, and reperfusion therapy will be collected. The type of ACS (unstable angina, NSTEMI, or STEMI) will also be clearly defined. The time from first medical contact to balloon inflation (FMC-to-balloon) and door-to-ballon time will be registered. In-hospital death and complications will be registered. Data on the post-hospital primary outcome (MACE: cardiac death, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, stroke, need for coronary revascularization) of patients, at 30 days and 1 year, will be included in the registry.

Performance of acute coronary syndrome approaches in Brazil: a report from the BRACE (Brazilian Registry in Acute Coronary SyndromEs)

AIMS

Diagnostic and therapeutic tools have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality associated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Data about ACS performance measures are scarce in Brazil, and improving its collection is an objective of the Brazilian Registry in Acute Coronary syndromEs (BRACE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The BRACE is a cross-sectional, observational epidemiological registry of ACS patients. Stratified 'cluster sampling' methodology was adopted to obtain a representative picture of ACS. A performance score (PS) varying from 0 to 100 was developed to compare studied parameters. Performance measures alone and the PS were compared between institutions, and the relationship between the PS and outcomes was evaluated. A total of 1150 patients, median age 63 years, 64% male, from 72 hospitals were included in the registry. The mean PS for the overall population was 65.9% ± 20.1%. Teaching institutions had a significantly higher PS (71.4% ± 16.9%) compared with non-teaching hospitals (63.4% ± 21%; P < 0.001). Overall in-hospital mortality was 5.2%, and the variables that correlated independently with in-hospital mortality included: PS-per point increase (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, P < 0.001), age-per year (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.08-9.00, P = 0.036), and prior angioplasty (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.84, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In BRACE, the adoption of evidence-based therapies for ACS, as measured by the performance score, was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality. The use of diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches for the management of ACS is less than ideal in Brazil, with high variability especially among different regions of the country.

Disparities in Access to Revascularization: Evidence from New York

Purpose: To quantify and compare citywide disparities in the performance of coronary revascularization procedures in New York residents diagnosed with ischemic heart disease (IHD) by the characteristics of the patients and their neighborhood of residence in 2000–2002 and 2011–2013.

Methods: We identify the number of hospitalizations for patients with diagnoses of IHD and/or congestive heart failure (CHF) and the number of revascularization procedures performed on the population 45 years and older, relying on hospital administrative data for New York City, by area of residence, from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). We conduct multiple logistic regressions to analyze the factors associated with revascularization for hospitalized patients admitted with IHD and CHF over the two time periods.

Results: Despite any decline in population health status, both the age-adjusted rates of inpatient hospital discharges for acute myocardial infarction, for IHD and for CHF, decreased as did the rates of revascularization procedures. Racial and ethnic disparities were much smaller in the later period than those documented earlier. However, there were persistent gender, insurance status, and neighborhood-level disparities in the treatment of heart disease.

Conclusions: With the declines in rates of heart disease, our findings point to the need for more clinical and population-based research to improve the understanding of why race/ethnicity, gender, insurance status, and neighborhood-level disparities persist in the treatment of heart disease.

Outcomes of medically managed patients with myocardial infarction

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes associated with medical management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting to hospitals with and without onsite catheterization facilities.

METHODS

All patients (n=25,921) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=10,563) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=15,358) in Alberta, Canada between April 2010-March 2016 were categorized according to availability of catheterization facilities at the hospital they presented to and their management strategy (medically managed without coronary angiography or medically managed after coronary angiography).

RESULTS

Overall, 51% presented to hospitals without catheterization facilities; and 34% were managed medically (18% without coronary angiography, and 16% after coronary angiography). Rates of medical management were higher at hospitals without versus those with catheterization facilities (43% vs. 24%, p<0.01). However, both the rate of presentation to hospitals without catheterization facilities (70% non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 24% ST-elevation myocardial infarction, p<0.01) and medical management (45% non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 18% ST-elevation myocardial infarction, p<0.01) differed by myocardial infarction type. The lack of catheterization facilities at the presenting hospital had no association with in-hospital mortality in patients medically managed without coronary angiography, but was associated with a lower risk of mortality among patients medically managed after coronary angiography. However, the latter benefit was restricted to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients only (adjusted hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.76).

CONCLUSION

The availability of catheterization facilities at the hospital at which non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presented influenced their likelihood of being medically managed, but was not associated with adverse short- or long-term mortality outcomes.

Assessing Performance and Quality After Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes and discusses the evidence base supporting current performance and quality measures used in assessing institutions in their care of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Professional societies in the USA and Europe have developed performance and quality measures for NSTE-ACS. These measures are reviewed and updated periodically to reflect the most important evidence from the literature. In the USA, the ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures published the updated 2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. In Europe, the ESC Acute Cardiac Care Association published the 2017 Quality Indicators for acute myocardial infarction. These documents build on guidelines previously developed and published by the two organizations. They include detailed reviews of current and past studies establishing that adherence with guidelines improves clinical outcomes. Both measure sets provide quantitative methodologies to assess program performance. Institutional programs that focus on these validated measures can increase guideline adherence, streamline and standardize care processes, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Performance and quality measures have become a critical part of healthcare today, allowing patients, providers, administrators, and payors to assess patient care objectively. They are also becoming an important component of value-based payment programs. To be fair, and useful, for internal institutional assessment, in comparing different institutions, and for value-based payments, only validated performance measures such as these should be employed.

Preventing recurrent events in survivors of acute coronary syndromes in Australia: consensus recommendations using the Delphi process

OBJECTIVE

There remain substantial gaps in implementation of evidence-based care in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Australia, which contribute to high recurrent event rates. Improved translation of evidence into effective action is a key health-care priority. We engaged cardiovascular experts from across Australia to develop straightforward, easily actionable recommendations on key medications to use following ACS.

METHODS

An eight-person steering committee (SC) reviewed the published evidence and developed an initial set of statements to be developed into consensus recommendations using a modified Delphi technique. A panel of 21 expert cardiologists in the ACS field (including the SC) voted on their level of agreement with the statements using a 6 point Likert scale. Statements that did not reach consensus (≥80% agreement) were reviewed by the SC, modified as appropriate based on input from the panel and circulated for re-voting.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight statements were developed by the SC across six classes of medication: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering agents, aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, beta blockers and "other". Twenty-six recommendations were endorsed by the voting panel; two statements did not reach consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the extensive evidence base and detailed guidelines outlining best practice post ACS, there remain considerable gaps in translating these into everyday care. We used an internationally recognized technique to develop practical consensus recommendations on medical treatment following ACS. These simple, up-to-date recommendations aim to improve evidence-based medication use and thereby reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events for Australian patients with ACS.

Objectives and Design of the Russian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry (RusACSR)

The Russian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry (RusACSR) is a retrospective, continuous, nationwide, Web-based registry of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The RusACSR is a database that uses a secure Web-based interface for data entry by individual users. Participation in the RusACSR is voluntary. Any clinical center that provides health care to ACS patients can take part in the RusACSR. The RusACSR enrolls ACS patients who have undergone care in Russian hospitals from February 2008 to the present. Key data elements and methods of data analysis in the RusACSR are presented in this article. Up to 2015, 213 clinical centers from 36 regions of Russia had participated in the RusACSR. Currently, the database contains data on more than 250 000 ACS patients who underwent care from 2008 to 2015. Some current problems are highlighted in this article. The RusACSR is a perspective project for different epidemiologic studies in Russian ACS patients.

The Association of Transfer Rate From Hospitals Without Revascularization Capabilities and Mortality Risk for Older Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

BACKGROUND

Interhospital transfer invasive management patterns and implications for older non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients initially presenting to non-revascularization-capable hospitals have not been explored.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients admitted to hospitals with a higher transfer proportion have lower risk of long-term mortality.

METHODS

We linked CRUSADE Registry data on 5678 patients age ≥65 years from 65 United States non-revascularization-capable hospitals (2003-2006) with inpatient Medicare longitudinal claims. Hospitals were categorized according to hospital-level patient transfer-out rates, low (≤40%) vs high (>40%). The associations between transfer-out rates and 30-day, 6-month, and 3-year mortality risk were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Hospital-level transfer-out rates varied widely (median, 43%; interquartile range, 31%-54%). Compared with patients from low-transfer-out hospitals (n = 2715), patients from high-transfer-out hospitals (n = 2963) were more likely to be male, less likely to have renal insufficiency and prior heart failure, and had lower long-term CRUSADE mortality risk scores. These patients also more commonly received evidence-based acute medications before transfer and underwent subsequent revascularization after transfer. The adjusted risks of mortality at various time intervals were similar for those from high- vs low-transfer-out hospitals: 30 days (hazard ratio: 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.14), 6 months (0.97, 0.84-1.12), and 3 years (1.01, 0.91-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer rates for older NSTEMI patients vary widely among non-revascularization-capable hospitals. Despite lower predicted mortality risk and higher rates of post-transfer revascularization, patients from high-transfer-out hospitals had a similar risk for short- and long-term mortality compared with those from low-transfer-out hospitals.

Quality Markers in Cardiology. Main Markers to Measure Quality of Results (Outcomes) and Quality Measures Related to Better Results in Clinical Practice (Performance Metrics). INCARDIO (Indicadores de Calidad en Unidades Asistenciales del Área del Corazón): A SEC/SECTCV Consensus Position Paper

Cardiology practice requires complex organization that impacts overall outcomes and may differ substantially among hospitals and communities. The aim of this consensus document is to define quality markers in cardiology, including markers to measure the quality of results (outcomes metrics) and quality measures related to better results in clinical practice (performance metrics). The document is mainly intended for the Spanish health care system and may serve as a basis for similar documents in other countries.

Temporal trends for secondary prevention measures among patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have noted that in-hospital adherence to secondary prevention measures varied among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary revascularization, or no intervention. We sought to study contemporary temporal trends in the in-hospital management of patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

By using data from the Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry, we compared adherence to 6 performance measures (aspirin within 24 hours, discharge on aspirin, discharge on beta-blockers, patients with low ejection fraction discharged on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, smoking cessation counseling, and use of lipid-lowering medications) in eligible patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or no intervention between 2003 and 2008.

RESULTS

A total of 113,971 patients with coronary artery disease were treated at 193 hospitals. Overall adherence to all 6 quality of care measures improved over time in all 3 treatment groups, but was highest at all time periods in the percutaneous coronary intervention group compared with the coronary artery bypass graft surgery group, whereas the no intervention group had the lowest use of prevention measures at all time points (P < .0001). Likewise, 100% adherence to all 6 measures was superior in the percutaneous coronary intervention group at all time points (P < .0001). On multivariable adjustment for case-mix of patients, the majority of these differences persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last decade, overall adherence with secondary prevention measures improved significantly in patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease regardless of revascularization strategy. However, there still exist select opportunities for improving adherence, particularly among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery or no intervention.

Point-of-care platelet function testing predicts bleeding in patients exposed to clopidogrel undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: Verify pre-op TIMI 45--a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend delaying coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for 5 days after discontinuing clopidogrel. However, platelet function may recover quicker in certain individuals.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that perioperative measurement of platelet function with a point-of-care P2Y12 inhibitor assay could predict bleeding during CABG in patients exposed to clopidogrel.

METHODS

Verify Pre-Op TIMI 45 was a prospective pilot study of 39 patients on clopidogrel who subsequently underwent CABG. Preoperative on-treatment platelet reactivity was assessed with VerifyNow P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU), with higher PRU indicating more reactive platelets. Outcomes were stratified by PRU quartiles, as well as prespecified cutpoints for the lowest quartile (PRU 173), a cutpoint for major bleeding determined by the Youden index using receiver operator curve analysis (PRU 207), and clopidogrel resistance (PRU 230).

RESULTS

Patients in higher PRU quartiles experienced smaller decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit (P < 0.05 for all comparisons), less major bleeding (P = 0.021), and less major or minor bleeding (P = 0.003). Patients above the PRU 207 and 230 cutpoints had less chest-tube output (P = 0.041 and P = 0.012, respectively), less major bleeding (P = 0.005 and P = 0.036, respectively), and less major or minor bleeding (P = 0.013 and P < 0.001, respectively). By receiver operator curve analysis, preoperative PRU ≤ 207 discriminated between patients with and without major bleeding during surgery (area under the curve: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.94, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, we found that point-of-care platelet function assessment could predict bleeding in patients recently exposed to clopidogrel undergoing CABG.