Long-term follow-up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death

The pivotal role of compelling high-risk electrocardiographic markers in prediction of ventricular arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several investigations have shown that existing risk stratification processes remain insufficient for stratifying sudden cardiac death risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Multiple auxiliary parameters are investigated to offer a more precise prognostic model. Our aim was to assess the association between several ECG markers (epsilon waves, prolonged terminal activation duration (TAD) of QRS, fragmented QRS (fQRS), late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SA-ECG), T-wave inversion (TWI) in right precordial leads, and extension of TWI in inferior leads) with the risk of developing poor outcomes in ARVC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search from several databases was conducted until September 9th, 2023. Studies were eligible if it investigated the relationship between the ECG markers with the risk of developing ventricular arrhythmic events.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis encompassed 25 studies with a total of 3767 participants. Our study disclosed that epsilon waves, prolonged TAD of QRS, fQRS, late potentials on SA-ECG, TWI in right precordial leads, and extension of TWI in inferior leads were associated with the incremental risk of ventricular arrhythmias, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, and sudden cardiac death, with the risk ratios ranging from 1.46 to 2.11. In addition, diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis stipulated that the extension of TWI in inferior leads had the uppermost overall area under curve (AUC) value amidst other ECG markers apropos of our outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSION

A multivariable risk assessment strategy based on the previously stated ECG markers potentially enhances the current risk stratification models in ARVC patients, especially extension of TWI in inferior leads.

Evolution and triggers of defibrillator shocks in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can prevent sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). The aim of our study was to assess the cumulative burden, evolution and potential triggers of appropriate ICD shocks during long-term follow-up, which may help to reduce and further refine individual arrhythmic risk in this challenging disease.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 53 patients with definite ARVC according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria from the multicentre Swiss ARVC Registry with an implanted ICD for primary or secondary prevention. Follow-up was conducted by assessing all available patient records from patient visits, hospitalisations, blood samples, genetic analysis, as well as device interrogation and tracings.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (male 71.7%, mean age 43±2.2 years, genotype positive 58.5%) were analysed during a median follow-up of 7.9 (IQR 10) years. In 29 (54.7%) patients, 177 appropriate ICD shocks associated with 71 shock episodes occurred. Median time to first appropriate ICD shock was 2.8 (IQR 3.6) years. Long-term risk of shocks remained high throughout long-term follow-up. Shock episodes occurred mainly during daytime (91.5%, n=65) and without seasonal preference. We identified potentially reversible triggers in 56 of 71 (78.9%) appropriate shock episodes, the main triggers representing physical activity, inflammation and hypokalaemia.

CONCLUSION

The long-term risk of appropriate ICD shocks in patients with ARVC remains high during long-term follow-up. Ventricular arrhythmias occur more often during daytime, without seasonal preference. Reversible triggers are frequent with the most common triggers for appropriate ICD shocks being physical activity, inflammation and hypokalaemia in this patient population.

Incidence, Predictors and Clinical Impact of Ventricular Electrical Storm in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Single-Center Report with Medium-Term Follow-Up

Background

Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective strategy for prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). However, some patients receive ventricular electrical storm (VES), characterized by multiple episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors and prognostic implications of VES in ACM patients with an ICD.

Methods

A total of 88 patients with definite ACM who received an ICD and followed up continuously were included in this study. VES was defined as the occurrence of ≥3 separate episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias within a 24-hour period.

Results

During a median follow-up time of 4.0 years (range 1.6–6.9), VES occurred in 19/88 patients (21.6%). The interval between the ICD implantation and the first VES ranged from 1 month to 128 months. The median number of ventricular tachyarrhythmia events per VES was 7.5 (range 3–32). Multivariate analysis showed that VES was associated with a high body mass index (BMI) [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.45, P=0.048)] and extensive T-wave inversion (TWI) (HR 23.39, 95% CI 1.74–314.58, P=0.017). Kaplan–Meier method showed that patients with VES did not have a worse cardiac mortality compared to those without such an event.

Conclusion

There is a relatively high incidence of VES in ACM patients. The presence of high BMI and extensive TWI were strong predictors of VES occurrence in ACM patients with ICD. VES does not independently confer increased cardiac mortality.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: Anti-arrhythmic Drug for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Background: Current treatment guidelines for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) mainly emphasize on prevention of ventricular arrhythmic events. Despite the progressive nature of ARVC, therapeutic options focusing on decelerating disease progression are scarce.

Methods and Results: This retrospective observational cohort study included 311 patients [age, 39.1 ± 14.4 years; male, 233 (74.9%)] with a definite diagnosis of ARVC as determined by the 2010 Task Force Diagnostic Criteria. Among them, 113 patients (36.3%) received ACEI/ARB treatment. Disease progression was evaluated according to repeat transthoracic echocardiograms with a linear mixed model. Patients receiving ACEI/ARB treatment were associated with slower disease progression reflected by a gradual decrease in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion than those not receiving ACEI/ARB treatment (0.37 vs. 0.61 mm per year decrease, P < 0.001) and slower dilation of right ventricular outflow tract (0.57 vs. 1.06 mm per year increased, P = 0.003). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the association between life-threatening ventricular tachycardia events and ACEI/ARB treatment. A reduced risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia was associated with ACEI/ARB treatment compared to that without ACEI/ARB treatment (adjusted HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.96, P = 0.031).

Conclusions: ACEI/ARB treatment is associated with slower disease progression and lower risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ARVC. Delaying disease progression may pave way for reducing life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia risk.

Implantable cardiac defibrillator events in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is associated with a risk of sudden cardiac death. Optimal risk stratification is still under debate. The main purpose of this long-term, single-centre observation was to analyse predictors of appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions in the population of patients with ARVC with a high risk of life-threatening arrhythmias.

METHODS

The study comprised 65 adult patients (median age 40 years, 48 men) with a definite diagnosis of ARVC who received ICD over a time span of 20 years in primary (40%) or secondary (60%) prevention of sudden cardiac death. The study endpoints were first appropriate and inappropriate ICD interventions (shock or antitachycardia pacing) after device implantation.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 7.75 years after ICD implantation, nine patients died and six individuals underwent heart transplantation. Appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 43 patients (66.2%) and inappropriate ICD interventions in 18 patients (27.7%). Multivariable analysis using cause-specific hazard model identified three predictors of appropriate ICD interventions: right ventricle dysfunction (cause-specific HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.21, p<0.001), age <40 years at ICD implantation (cause-specific HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.94, p=0.022) and a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (cause-specific HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.16 to 5.63, p=0.020). Predictors of inappropriate ICD therapy were not found. Complications related to ICD implantation occurred in 12 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Right ventricle dysfunction, age <40 years and a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia were predictors of appropriate ICD interventions in patients with ARVC. The results may be used to improve risk stratification before ICD implantation.

Cardiomyopathies in China: A 2018-2019 state-of-the-art review

Cardiomyopathies are diseases of the cardiac muscle and are often characterized by ventricular dilation, hypertrophy, and cardiac arrhythmia. Patients with cardiomyopathies often experience sudden death and cardiac failure and require cardiac transplantation during the course of disease progression. Early diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and genetic consultation depend on imaging techniques, genetic testing, and new emerging diagnostic tools such as serum biomarkers. The molecular genetics of cardiomyopathies has been widely studied recently. The discovery of mechanisms underlying heterogeneity and overlapping of the phenotypes of cardiomyopathies has revealed the existence of disease modifiers, and this has led to the emergence of novel disease-modifying therapy. This 2018-2019 state-of-the-art review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiomyopathies in China.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a progressive cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrofatty infiltration of the myocardium, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden death, and heart failure. ARVC may be an important cause of syncope, sudden death, ventricular arrhythmias, and/or wall motion abnormalities, especially in the young. As the first symptom is sudden death or cardiac arrest in many cases, an early diagnosis and risk stratification are important. Recent advances in diagnostic modalities will be helpful in the early diagnosis and proper management of patients at risk. Restriction of strenuous exercise and implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are important in addition to medical treatment and catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Recently introduced genetic screening may help to identify asymptomatic carriers with a risk of a disease progression and sudden death.

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: A double-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized, genotype-driven study (BRAVE study)

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a rare cardiomyopathy characterized by the progressive replacement of cardiomyocytes by fatty and fibrous tissue in the right ventricle (RV). These infiltrations lead to cardiac electrical instability and ventricular arrhythmia. Current treatment for ARVD is empirical and essentially based on treatment of arrhythmia. Thus, there is no validated treatment that will prevent the deterioration of RV function in patients with ARVD. The aim of the BRAVE study is to evaluate the effect of ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, on ventricular myocardial remodeling and arrhythmia burden in patients with ARVD. Despite the fact that myocardial fibrosis is one of the structural hallmarks of ARVD, no study has tested an antifibrotic drug in ARVD patients. The trial is a double-blind, parallel, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase 4 drug study. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups, ramipril or placebo. The 120 patients (60 per group) will be enrolled by 26 centers in France. Patients will be followed up every 6 months for 3 years. The 2 co-primary endpoints are defined as the difference of telediastolic RV volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging between baseline and 3 years of follow-up, and the change in arrhythmia burden during the 3 years of follow-up. A decrease in RV and/or left ventricular deterioration and in arrhythmia burden are expected in ARVD patients treated with ramipril. This reduction will improve quality of life of patients and will reduce the number of hospitalizations and the risk of terminal heart failure.

Long-term follow-up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a rare inherited cardiomyopathy with a high burden of ventricular arrhythmia, which is an important cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is believed to be the most reliable management against SCD.

HYPOTHESIS

Ventricular arrhythmia does not necessarily confer a poor prognosis in ARVC patients with an ICD.

METHODS

A total of 39 ARVC patients (34 male) implanted with an ICD at our electrophysiology center and followed up continuously were included in this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 42.1 ± 14.8 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (84.6%) had suffered ventricular arrhythmia with hemodynamic compromise before ICD implantation. During a median follow-up of 48.6 months (interquartile range, 32.3-73.3), 3 patients (7.7%) died, 1 of sudden death, 1 of heart failure, and 1 of cerebral infarction. Twenty-eight patients (71.8%) experienced 540 appropriate ICD interventions. The first appropriate ICD intervention occurred more than 2 years after initial ICD implantation in 5 patients (12.8%). Twelve patients (30.8%) suffered from electrical storm. The event-free period was significantly shorter in patients who did not have broad precordial T wave inversion ≥V1-V3 (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.96). No significant difference was shown in antiarrhythmic drugs and radiofrequency catheter ablation before ICD implantation between patients with and without appropriate ICD therapies (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation is frequent in high-risk patients with ARVC. The prognosis is favorable for ARVC patients treated with an ICD for prevention of SCD.