Alcohol septal ablation vs myectomy for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

Extended septal myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation: clinical results at a national referral centre

OBJECTIVES

Extended septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation are 2 invasive treatments for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Our goal was to compare which of these techniques achieved a higher reduction in gradients, improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and reduction in medical treatment.

METHODS

It is a single-centre observational and retrospective analysis. We used multivariable regression analyses to assess the association of ablation/myectomy with different outcomes. The odds ratio or coefficient along with the 95% confidence interval was estimated according to the group and adjusted for the corresponding preprocedural variables and EuroSCORE II.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients underwent septal myectomy, and 25 patients underwent alcohol septal ablation. Basal and Valsalva gradients after myectomy were reduced to a higher degree in comparison to ablation: 21.0 mmHg [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval -30.7; -11.3], and 34.3 mmHg (P < 0.001, -49.1; -19.5) respectively. Those patients who received a myectomy had a lower probability of having moderate mitral regurgitation (odds ratio = 0.18, P = 0.054). Patients after septal myectomy were more likely to be NYHA functional class I (80.4%), whereas patients after ablation were more likely to be NYHA functional class III (48%). Both groups continued with beta-blocker therapy, but disopyramide could be discontinued after the myectomy in more cases (20%-36% vs 59%-1.3%; P < 0.001), and there was a tendency to discontinue calcium channel blockers (48%-16% vs 15.4-3.8%; P = 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment using preprocedural gradients and EuroSCORE II, myectomy achieves greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradients compared to septal ablation.

Mortality After Alcohol Septal Ablation vs. Septal Myectomy in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and septal myectomy (SM) are 2 options for septal reduction therapy (SRT) to treat medication-resistant symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Because differences in mortality rates after these different SRT methods have not been extensively investigated in real-world settings, in this study compared the 1-year mortality rates after ASA and SM using population-based database. Methods and Results: Utilizing New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data from 2005 to 2016, we performed a comparative effectiveness study of ASA vs. SM in patients with HCM. The outcome was all-cause death up to 360 days after SRT. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model and performed sensitivity analysis with propensity score (PS)-matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methods. We identified 755 patients with HCM who underwent SRT: 348 with ASA and 407 with SM. The multivariable analysis showed that all-cause deaths were significantly fewer in the ASA group at 360 days after SRT (adjusted odds ratio=0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.84; P=0.02). The PS-matching and IPTW methods also supported a lower mortality rate in the ASA group at 360 days post-SRT. Conclusions: In this population-based study of patients with HCM who underwent SRT in a real-world setting, the 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who underwent ASA compared with SM.

Short time effects of two radiofrequency ablation methods on hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation has been applied for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). The two known procedures are percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA) and endocardial radiofrequency septal ablation (ERSA).

METHODS

This study presents a retrospective analysis of the PIMSRA and ERSA procedures in patients with drug-refractory HOCM. A total of 28 patients participated in the study, with 12 receiving PIMSRA and 16 receiving ERSA. The objective of our study was to compare the short-term effects of these two radiofrequency ablation procedures.

RESULTS

At the 30-day follow-up, the PIMSRA group demonstrated a greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract peak gradient at rest compared to the ERSA group (22.25 [16.72] mmHg versus 47.75 [21.94] mmHg) (p < .01). The values for the PIMSRA group decreased from 99.33 (32.00) mmHg to 22.25 (16.72) mmHg (p < .01), while the ERSA group decreased from 97.75 (30.24) mmHg to 47.75 (21.94) mmHg (p < .01). Only the PIMSRA group exhibited a decrease in mitral regurgitation (MR). The area of MR decreased from 10.13 (4.12) mm2 to 3.65 (2.80) mm2 in the PIMSRA group (p < .01). Additionally, the PIMSRA group experienced reductions in left atrial diameter (LAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)%. The values for LAD changed from 43.58 (7.53) mm to 37.08 (6.92) mm (p = .03), and the values for LVEF% decreased from 65.75 (6.12) pg/mL to 60.83 (4.06) pg/mL (p = .03).

CONCLUSION

In terms of the two types of radiofrequency ablation methods used in HOCM, it has been observed that PIMSRA demonstrates a more favorable early treatment effect compared to ERSA.

A systematic review of present and future pharmaco-structural therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common contemporary, treatable, genetic disorder that can be compatible with normal longevity. While current medical therapies are ubiquitous, they are limited by a lack of solid evidence, are often inadequate, poorly tolerated, and do not alter the natural disease course. As such, there has long been a need for effective, evidence-based, and targeted disease-modifying therapies for HCM. In this review, we redefine HCM as a treatable condition, evaluate current strategies for therapeutic intervention, and discuss novel myosin inhibitors. The majority of patients with HCM have elevated left ventricular outflow tract gradients, which predicts worse symptoms and adverse outcomes. Conventional pharmacological therapies for symptomatic HCM can help improve symptoms but are often inadequate and poorly tolerated. Septal reduction therapies (surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation) can safely and effectively reduce refractory symptoms and improve outcomes in patients with obstructive HCM. However, they require expertise that is not universally available and are not without risks. Currently, available therapies do not alter the disease course or the progressive cardiac remodeling that ensues, nor subsequent heart failure and arrhythmias. This has been regarded as an unmet need in the care of HCM patients. Novel targeted pharmacotherapies, namely cardiac myosin inhibitors, have emerged to reverse key pathophysiological changes and alter disease course. Their favorable outcomes led to the early Food and Drug Administration approval of mavacamten, a first-in-class myosin modulator, changing the paradigm for the pharmacological treatment of HCM.

Alcohol septal ablation in patients aged 75 years or older with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

Outcome data for patients ≥75 years with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) undergoing alcohol septal ablation (ASA) are lacking. Therefore, a retrospective single-centre analysis was conducted.

METHODS

The data of all consecutive ASAs, that were performed at our institution between 1 September 1997 and 31 July 2021 in patients with HOCM with left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTG) ≥50 mm Hg, were collected from patient reports. ASA was performed per institutional standards with 95% ethanol infused into a feasible septal branch. Differences regarding echocardiographic, procedural and clinical parameters at baseline and after 6 months between patients ≥75 years and <75 years were assessed.

RESULTS

We found 208 ASAs in patients ≥75 years (85.1% female; age 78.0 years (IQR 76.0-80.0)) and 1430 ASAs in patients <75 years (42.0% female; age 56.0 years (IQR 46.0-65.0)). Patients ≥75 years had lower distances in 6 min walk test (baseline: 317.0 m (IQR 242.0-389.0) vs 438.0 m (IQR 353.3-504.0); p<0.0001). Exercise-induced LVOTG calculated at follow-up was lower in patients ≥75 years (29.5 mm Hg (IQR 18.0-54.0) vs 39.5 mm Hg (IQR 23.0-73.8); p=0.0007). There were more high-degree AV blocks after ASA in patients ≥75 years (25.5% vs 13.6%; p<0.0001). The in-hospital mortality did not differ between the groups (age ≥75 years: 1.0%; age <75 years: 0.6%; p=0.6580).

CONCLUSION

ASA had similar efficacy and intrahospital mortality in patients ≥75 years compared with younger patients. Higher rates of AV block with need for permanent pacemaker implantation were observed in patients ≥75 years of age.

Alcohol Septal Ablation or Mavacamten for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disease characterized by an increased left ventricular wall thickness in the absence of increased afterload conditions. In addition to diastolic dysfunction, obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract is common in HCM and has an important influence on symptoms and outcome. Over the last five decades or two decades, respectively, surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation were the only therapeutic options if standard medical care was not sufficient. Recently, a new option has become available that has the potential to revolutionize the therapeutic strategies for patients with HCM. Mavacamten is a myosin inhibitor that belongs to a completely new drug class and targets the excessive actin-myosin cross-bridging that is the underlying pathology of HCM. By reducing the actin-myosin interactions, mavacamten not only reduces the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction but also seems to have positive effects on the diastolic function, microcirculation, and cardiac structure. This article summarizes the current evidence on alcohol septal ablation and reviews the preclinical and clinical data on mavacamten for the treatment of patients with obstructive HCM.

Age-Based Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Septal Reduction Therapy

There are no national data on age-based outcomes of septal reduction therapy. Using the National Inpatient Sample, we included all adult patients who underwent septal myectomy (SM) or alcohol septal ablation (ASA) from 2005 to 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the in-hospital mortality and new permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement after SM and ASA in 3 age groups. In total, 9,564 patients underwent SM and 5,084 underwent ASA. Compared with the age group 18 to 39 years, the odds of in-hospital mortality after SM were similar in age group 40 to 64 years and 4.46 times higher than in age group ≥65 years; the higher mortality in the older group was explained by higher co-morbidity burden on the risk-adjusted analysis. Furthermore, compared with age group 18 to 39 years, the odds of new PPM placement after SM were higher in the age groups 40 to 64 years and ≥65 years, despite the risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33 to 7.58 and AOR 4.39, 95% CI 1.78 to 10.8, respectively). The odds of in-hospital mortality after ASA were similar in age groups 65 to 79 years and 18 to 64 years. However, the odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in the age group ≥80 years than in the age group 18 to 64 years, although this difference were not present after risk adjustment. The odds of new PPM after ASA were higher for the age groups 65 to 79 years and ≥80 years than age group 18 to 64 years, despite the risk adjustment (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.60 and AOR 3.10, 95% CI 2.09 to 6.57, respectively). Finally, we also estimated these absolute risks in different age groups. In conclusion, this national data will inform health care providers to better understand the aged-based risks of outcomes after septal reduction therapy.

Unmet needs and future directions in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a highly treatable monogenetic disorder affecting nearly 0.2% of the population. The high burden of this disease demands suitable measures for early diagnosis and preventing as well as tackling misdiagnosis. While conventionally available therapies have been efficacious in reducing symptoms, they have not been able to change the natural history of the disease. The landscape of medical treatment is rapidly changing with advent of novel pharmacotherapies such as cardiac myosin inhibitors. Ongoing investigations in gene editing have demonstrated benefits in correcting underlying genetic mutations and this is where the future of treatment lies. Contemporary procedural techniques as alternatives to available septal reduction therapies independent of coronary vascular anatomy are also emerging. This review details the recent developments, unmet needs and future directions in diagnosis, medical and invasive treatment of HCM.

Invasive therapies for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic condition with multiple different genetic and clinical phenotypes. As awareness for HCM increases, it is important to also be familiar with potential treatment options for the disease. Treatment of HCM can be divided into two different categories, medical and interventional. Typically for obstructive forms of the disease, in which increased septal hypertrophy, abnormally placed papillary muscles, abnormalities in mitral valve or subvalvular apparatus, lead to dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, treatment is targeted at decreasing obstructive gradients and therefore symptoms. Medications like beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, disopyramide can often accomplish this. However, in patients with severe obstruction or symptoms refractory to medical therapy, either surgical correction of the LVOT obstruction or percutaneous via alcohol septal ablation, are treatment options. In this review, we will focus on the invasive treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is one of the most common genetic causes of heart disease. Since the initial description of HCM, there have been minimal strides in management options. Obstructive HCM constitutes a larger subset of patients with increased left ventricular outflow tract gradients causing symptoms. Septal reduction therapy (SRT) has been successful, but it is not the answer for all patients and is not disease modifying.

AREAS COVERED

Current guideline recommendations include beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or disopyramides for medical management, but there lacks evidence of much benefit with these drugs. In recent years, there has been the emergence of cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMI) which have demonstrated positive results in patients with both obstructive and non-obstructive HCM. In addition to CMIs, other drugs have been investigated as we have learned more about HCM's pathological mechanisms. Drugs targeting sodium channels and myocardial energetics, as well as repurposed drugs that have demonstrated positive remodeling are being investigated as potential therapeutic targets. Gene therapy is being explored with vast potential for the treatment of HCM.

EXPERT OPINION

The armamentarium of therapeutic options for HCM is continuously increasing with the emergence of CMIs as mainstays of treatment. The future of HCM treatment is promising.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Current Treatment and Future Options

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a disease involving the cardiac sarcomere. It is associated with various disease-causing gene mutations and phenotypic expressions, managed with different therapies with variable prognoses. The heterogeneity of the disease is evident in the fact that it burdens patients of all ages. HCM is the most prevalent cause of sudden death in athletes. However, several technological advancements and therapeutic options have reduced mortality in patients with HCM to 0.5% per year. In addition, rapid advances in our knowledge of the molecular defects accountable for HCM have strengthened our awareness of the disorder and recommended new approaches to the assessment of prognosis. Despite all these evolutions, a small subgroup of patients with HCM will experience sudden cardiac death, and risk stratification remains a critical challenge. This review provides a practical guide to the updated recommendations for patients with HCM, including clinical updates for diagnosis, family screening, clinical imaging, risk stratification, and management.

Multi-modality management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant inherited condition defined by left ventricular wall thickness greater than 15 mm in the absence of other conditions that could explain that degree of hypertrophy. Obstructive HCM associated with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is defined by an intraventricular systolic pressure gradient greater than or equal to 30 mm Hg. Over the past couple of decades, there has been an expansion of both invasive and pharmacotherapeutic options for patients with HCM, with recent guidelines calling for a melody of invasive and non-invasive treatment strategies. There are several invasive therapies including proven therapies such as alcohol septal ablation and septal myectomy. Novel invasive therapies such as MitraClip, radiofrequency septal ablation and SESAME procedure have more recently been promoted. Pharmacological therapy has also dramatically evolved and includes conventional medications such as beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide. Mavacamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, may significantly change management. Other myosin inhibitors and modulators are also being developed and tested in large clinical trials. Given significant phenotypical variability in patients with HCM, clinical management can be challenging, and often requires an individualized approach with a combination of invasive and non-invasive options.

Survival After Septal Reduction in Patients >65 Years Old With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is increasingly being diagnosed in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to study long-term outcomes of septal reduction therapies (SRT) in Medicare patients with oHCM, and hospital volume-outcome relation.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries aged >65 years who underwent SRT, septal myectomy (SM) or alcohol septal ablation (ASA), from 2013 through 2019 were identified. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included heart failure (HF) readmission and need for redo SRT in follow-up. Overlap propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences between both groups. Relation between hospital SRT volume and short-term and long-term mortality was studied.

RESULTS

The study included 5,679 oHCM patients (SM = 3,680 and ASA = 1,999, mean age 72.9 vs 74.8 years, women 67.2% vs 71.1%; P < 0.01). SM patients had fewer comorbidities, but after adjustment, both groups were well balanced. At 4 years (IQR: 2-6 years), although there was no difference in long-term mortality between SM and ASA (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.74-1.03; P = 0.1), on landmark analysis, SM was associated with lower mortality after 2 years of follow-up (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.87; P < 0.001) and had lower need for redo SRT. Both reduced HF readmissions in follow-up vs 1 year pre-SRT. Higher-volume centers had better outcomes vs lower-volume centers, but 70% of SRT were performed in low-volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

SRT reduced HF readmission in Medicare patients with oHCM. SM is associated with lower redo and better long-term survival compared with ASA. Despite better outcomes in high-volume centers, 70% of SRT are performed in low-volume U.S. centers.

Effective treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction using a covered stent

A woman in her 60s presented with progressive exertional dyspnoea, exertional chest pressure and exertional dizziness. Echocardiogram identified a 156 mm Hg left ventricular outflow tract gradient with provocation, indicating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular outflow obstruction-confirmed with MRI and angiogram. An alcohol septal ablation was planned but due to communication of the second septal perforator with the right ventricle and a wire-induced mid-left anterior descending artery dissection, alcohol septal ablation was not performed. Instead, a covered stent was placed in the mid-left anterior descending artery covering the origins of the third and fourth septal perforators. The left ventricular outflow tract gradient decreased from 90 to 30 mm Hg with provocation and her symptoms improved. Follow-up showed a left ventricular outflow tract gradient of 35 mm Hg with provocation and decreased symptoms.

The Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias between Alcohol Septal Ablation and Septal Myectomy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis on Septal Reduction Therapy

Background

Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been more commonly applied in medical refractory hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) compared with septal myectomy (SM), however its potential to create a proarrhythmic substrate is increased.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2020. Fixed or random effects models were used to estimate the risk ratios (RR) for ventricular arrhythmia events or other outcomes between the SM and ASA cohorts.

Results

Twenty studies with 8025 patients were included. Pool analysis showed that the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), which included appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) intervention, was significantly higher in the ASA cohort than that in the SM cohort (ASA vs SM: 10% (345/3312) vs 5% (161/3227) (RR = 1.98, 95% CI (confidence interval), 1.65-2.37; p < 0.00001, I 2 = 0%). In both groups, more than 90% of VT/VF events occurred in the early phase (during the procedure, during hospitalization or within 30 days after the procedure) (ASA: 94.20%; SM: 94.41%). Further subgroup analysis also showed that the ASA group had a higher incidence of VT/VF in both the early phase (RR = 1.94, 95% CI, 1.61-2.33; p < 0.0001, I 2 = 0%) and the late phase (RR = 2.80, 95% CI, 1.00-7.89; p = 0.05, I 2 = 33%). Furthermore, although the risks of sudden cardiac death (SCD) were similar between the ASA and SM groups, a higher incidence of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), which included SCD and resuscitated SCA, was observed in the ASA group (RR = 2.30, 95% CI, 1.35-3.94; p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%).

Conclusions

In patients with HOCM, those who received ASA showed a higher incidence of VF/VT and SCD combined with resuscitated SCA. The majority of VT/VF occurred in the early phase.

Review of Contemporary Invasive Treatment Approaches and Critical Appraisal of Guidelines on Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: State-of-the-Art Review

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a heterogeneous disease with different clinical presentations, albeit producing similar dismal long-term outcomes if left untreated. Several approaches are available for the treatment of HOCM; e.g., alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and surgical myectomy (SM). The objectives of the current review were to (1) discuss the place of the standard invasive treatment modalities (ASA and SM) for HOCM; (2) summarize and compare novel techniques for the management of HOCM; (3) analyze current guidelines addressing HOCM management; and (4) offer suggestions for the treatment of complex HOCM presentations.

METHODS

We searched the literature and attempted to gather the most relevant and impactful available evidence on ASA, SM, and other invasive means of treatment of HOCM. The literature search yielded thousands of results, and 103 significant publications were ultimately included.

RESULTS

We critically analyzed available guidelines and provided context in the setting of patient selection for standard and novel treatment modalities. This review offers the most comprehensive analysis to-date of available invasive treatments for HOCM. These include the standard treatments, SM and ASA, as well as novel treatments such as dual-chamber pacing and radiofrequency catheter ablation. We also account for complex pathoanatomic presentations and current guidelines to offer suggestions for tailored care of patients with HOCM. Finally, we consider promising future therapies for HOCM.

CONCLUSIONS

HOCM is a heterogeneous disease associated with poor outcomes if left untreated. Several strategies for treatment of HOCM are available but patient selection for the procedure is crucial.

Comparison of Surgical Ventricular Septal Reduction to Alcohol Septal Ablation Therapy in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Ventricular septal myectomy (SM) and alcohol septal ablation (ASA), 2 septal reduction therapies (SRTs), are recommended in symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) despite maximum tolerated medical therapy. Contradictory results between the outcomes of these 2 types of therapies persist to this day. The objective of this study was to compare in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of SM versus ASA, at a nationwide level in France. We collected information on patients who underwent SRT for HCM using the French nationwide Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information database between 2010 and 2019. A total of 1,574 patients were identified in the database, including 340 patients in the SM arm and 1,234 patients in the ASA arm. No difference during the median follow-up of 1.3 years between the 2 groups was noted in terms of mortality (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.687, 95% confidence interval 0.361 to 1.309, p = 0.25). However, there was a significantly lower risk of all-cause stroke (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.180, 95% confidence interval 0.058 to 0.554, p = 0.003) in the ASA group. In conclusion, in our "real-life" data from France, mortality after SRT in patients with HCM was similar after ASA or SM. Moreover, ASA was more widely used than SM despite European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommendations.

Post-operative management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy patients are at increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest due to dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, myocardial ischaemia and arrhythmias. Septal myectomy remains the gold standard therapy for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) refractory to other therapy. This review comprehensively focuses on the post-operative management and complications of HOCM patients undergoing surgical correction. Although these patients are at risk of various perioperative complications from anaesthesia and surgery due to the underlying complexity of their disease, surgical myectomy is associated with excellent long-term outcomes if carried out in experienced centers.

Safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation in adolescents and young adults with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in young patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) are scarce. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASA in patients ≤ 25 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All ASAs between 2002 and 2020 at our institution were assigned to a group of patients 14-25 years of age (group 1) and a reference group > 25 years (group 2). 1,264 procedures were analysed in group 2 (58.6 ± 13.5 years) and 41 procedures in group 1 (20.9 ± 3.3 years). The baseline interventricular septal diameter (IVSD) was higher in group 1 (26.0 ± 6.5 mm vs. 21.3 ± 4.4 mm; p < 0.0001). There was no difference in baseline left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) (group 1: 54.4 ± 24.4 mmHg; group 2: 52.4 ± 36.6 mmHg; p = n.s.). A previous cardiac device was more often observed in group 1 (31.7% vs. 9.0%; p < 0.0001). Symptoms were improved after 6 months (group 1: mean NYHA class 2.5 at baseline and 1.3 at FU; p < 0.0001; group 2: mean NYHA class 2.7 at baseline and 1.4 at FU; p <0 .0001). IVSD (group 1: 20.3 ± 8.2 mm; group 2: 16.8 ± 5.7 mm; p < 0.0001 for each group compared to baseline) and LVOTG improved during FU (group 1: 25.5 ± 20.0 mmHg; group 2: 22.1 ± 21.7 mmHg; p < 0.0001 for each group). Intrahospital mortality was 0.0% in patients 14-25 years and 0.9% in the reference group. Persistent AV-block was observed in 12.2% of the group 1 and 15.9% of the group 2 patients (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSION

ASA is safe and effective in HOCM patients 14-25 years of age in experienced centres.

Targeting Alcohol Septal Ablation in Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Candidates for Surgical Myectomy: Added Value of Three-Dimensional Intracoronary Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

Background: Myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography (MC-2DE) is widely used to address alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Owing to its limited cut-planes, MC-2DE may inaccurately identify the contrast misplacement associated with an unsuccessful or complicated ASA outcome. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of myocardial contrast three-dimensional echocardiography (MC-3DE) compared with MC-2DE to identify the appropriate matching between the target septal zone (TSZ) and coronary artery branch for safe and long-term effective ASA in HCM patients. Methods: A consecutive series of 52 symptomatic obstructive HCM patients referred for isolated surgical myectomy (SM) was analyzed with MC-2DE and MC-3DE following injection of echocontrast into one or more septal branches. MC-2DE and MC-3DE patterns were categorized according to complete (Type 1) or incomplete (Type 2) TSZ covering, high-risk (Type 3) exceeding TSZ, or life-threatening outside TSZ distribution (Type 4). Results: MC-2DE per patient analysis showed a Type 1 pattern in 32 patients and Types 2–4 in the remaining 20 patients; subsequent MC-3DE analysis provided a re-phenotyping of MC-2DE findings in 22 of the 52 patients (42%), showing a high-risk Type 2 pattern in 17 of the 32 patients with Type 1, and a new life-threatening Type 4 in three patients with Type 2, respectively. All patients with MC-3DE Type 1 pattern underwent safe and effective ASA with a long-term uneventful follow-up, while the remaining patients underwent SM. Conclusions: Refining high risk or life-threatening contrast misplacement, MC-3DE is more accurate than conventional MC-2DE to target safe and long-term effective septal reduction with ASA in obstructive HCM patients referred for isolated SM.

Unmet needs in the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex heterogeneous cardiovascular disorder characterized by hypertrophied and disorganized myocytes with varying degrees of interstitial fibrosis. The current management strategies include genetic and familial screening, symptom control and prevention of sudden cardiac death in those at high risk. Until recently, septal reduction therapy and heart transplantation were the only disease modifying treatments available to manage HCM, but emerging pharmacotherapies show promising results in controlled clinical trials. In this article, we will review the unmet needs in the treatment of HCM incorporating novel therapies.

Uric acid is associated with cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The role of uric acid (UA) in survival of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine whether UA could be an independent risk factor of cardiac death in patients with HOCM.

METHODS

A total of 317 patients with HOCM, who were receiving conservative treatment in Fuwai Hospital from October 2009 to December 2014, all of them completed UA evaluations, were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the UA levels: Tertile 1 (≤ 318 μmol/L, n = 106), Tertile 2 (319 to 397 μmol/L, n = 105), and Tertile 3 (≥ 398 μmol/L, n = 106).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 45 months, 29 cardiac deaths (9.1%) occurred, including 6 sudden cardiac deaths and 23 heart failure-related deaths. Cardiac death in Tertile 3 (n = 16, 55.2%) was significantly higher than in Tertile 1 (n = 6, 20.7%) and Tertile 2 (n = 7, 24.1%). In univariate model, UA level (continuous value) showed predictive value of cardiac death [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.003−1.009,P = 0.009]. Univariate Cox survival analysis had shown a significant higher property of cardiac death in patients of Tertile 3 when compared with those of Tertile 1, but cardiac death in patients of Tertile 2 did not show significant prognositic value compared with those of Tertile 1 (HR = 3.927, 95% CI: 0.666−23.162,P = 0.131). UA was found to be an independent risk factor (HR = 1.005, 95% CI: 1.001−1.009,P = 0.009) of cardiac death in the multivariate regression analysis after the adjustment for age, body mass index, atrial fibrillation, hemoglobin, creatinine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interventricular septum/left ventricular posterior wall ratio, left ventricular outflow tract and left ventricular ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

UA concentration was found to be independently associated with cardiac death in HOCM patients receiving conservative treatment. Randomized trials of UA-lowering agents for HOCM patients are warranted.

Myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

There is very little evidence comparing the safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation versus septal myectomy for a septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of these procedures.

METHODS

Following propensity score matching, we retrospectively analysed outcomes in 105 patients who underwent myectomy and 105 who underwent septal ablation between 2011 and 2017 at 2 reference centres.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51.9 ± 14.3 and 52.2 ± 14.3 years in the myectomy and ablation groups, respectively (P = 0.855), and postoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradients were 13 (10-19) mmHg vs 16 (12-26) mmHg; P = 0.025. The 1-year prevalence of the New York Heart Association class III-IV was higher in the ablation group (none vs 6.4%; P = 0.041). The 5-year overall survival rate [96.8% (86.3-99.3) after myectomy and 93.5% (85.9-97.1) after ablation; P = 0.103] and cumulative incidence of sudden cardiac death [0% and 1.9% (0.5-7.5), respectively P = 0.797] did not differ between the groups. The cumulative reoperation rate within 5 years was lower after myectomy than after ablation [2.0% (0.5-7.6) vs 14.6% (8.6-24.1); P = 0.003]. Ablation was associated with a higher reoperation risk (subdistributional hazard ratio = 5.9; 95% confidence interval 1.3-26.3, P = 0.020). At follow-up, left ventricular outflow tract gradient [16 (11-20) vs 23 (15-59) mmHg; P < 0.001] and prevalence of 2+ mitral regurgitation (1.1% vs 10.6%; P = 0.016) were lower after myectomy than after ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures improved functional capacity; however, myectomy better-resolved classes III-IV of heart failure. Septal ablation was associated with higher reoperation rates. Myectomy demonstrated benefits in gradient relief and mitral regurgitation elimination. The results suggest that decreasing rates of myectomy procedures need to be investigated and reconsidered.

Propensity score matched comparison of isolated, elective aortic valve replacement with and without concomitant septal myectomy: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND

Septal myectomy during open aortic valve replacement (AVR) is an effective surgical treatment for asymmetric secondary basal septal hypertrophy. Concerns regarding higher rates of complications associated with this procedure have been raised - such as permanent pacemaker implantation. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications of patients with and without concomitant septal myectomy using propensity score matching applied to a large, consecutive single center cohort.

METHODS

A total of 2199 consecutive patients undergoing either AVR with concomitant myectomy (AVR-M, N.=212) or AVR alone (N.=1987) were analyzed (2009-2015). Patients with previous cardiac or emergency surgery, concomitant cardiac procedures and endocarditis were excluded. As reference to previously published data, patient characteristics and outcomes of the overall cohort were examined and for comparison between groups propensity score matching utilized.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohort, AVR-M patients were older (71.2±8 vs. 67.6±10 years, P<0.001) and more often female (68% vs. 37%, P<0.001) in comparison to patients receiving only AVR. After matching (N.=374) no significant difference in baseline features was evident. No significant difference in hospital mortality (2.1% vs. 1.6%, P=1.000) and pacemaker-implantation rate (5.3% vs. 3.7%, P=0.621) was observed. Mid-term survival was comparable between the two groups (86.1±5% vs. 84.4±5% after 6 years, P=0.957). The overall patient cohort showed a survival comparable to that of an adjusted regional normal population (P=0.178).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that concomitant myectomy in patients undergoing AVR is a safe surgical technique resulting in comparable hospital mortality and mid-term survival. Concomitant septal myectomy seems not to be associated with an increased pacemaker implantation rate.

The Surgeon's View of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in Congenital Heart Surgery

Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a component of many forms of congenital heart disease, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, membranous subaortic stenosis, tunnel subaortic stenosis, and outflow tract obstruction related to atrioventricular septal defects. We have gained a particularly extensive experience with the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, having performed septal myectomy in over 3,800 patients. In the setting of this review of LVOT obstruction, we use hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as a template by which other pathologies causing LVOT obstruction can be understood. We review important surgical issues in patient selection, diagnostic evaluation, interpretation of imaging, and operative management. To this end, the review focuses on obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and then broadens to discuss other pathologies causing LVOT obstruction, with important similarities and differences in their management. These other pathologies share some similar presentations and operative techniques, and at times can be confused with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but also have important distinctions of which the surgeon should be aware.

Cardiac implantable electronic device placement following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are sometimes required after alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The primary objectives of this study were to characterize the incidence, timing, and predictors of CIED placement after ASA for HCM.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the 2010-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Incidence, timing and independent predictors of CIED placement, as well as 30-day readmission rates were examined.

RESULTS

There were 1296 patients (national estimate = 2864) with HCM who underwent ASA. CIED were implanted in 322 (25% overall; 14% permanent pacemaker, 11% implantable cardioverter defibrillator) during the index hospitalization. Of these, 21%, 23%, 21%, and 18% occurred on postprocedure day 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Only 17 (1.3%) patients underwent CIED implantation between discharge and 30-day follow up. Independent predictors of index hospitalization CIED implantation included older age, diabetes, heart failure, nonelective index hospital admission and hospitalization at a privately owned hospital. Nonelective 30-day readmission rates among those who did and did not undergo CIED placement during their index hospitalization, were 6.8% and 7.9%, respectively (p = .53); median time to readmission was also similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One in four HCM patients undergoing ASA underwent CIED implantation during their index hospitalization; nearly 2/3rd during the first 48 h postprocedure. Private hospital ownership independently predicted CIED placement. More data are needed to better understand the unexpectedly high rates of CIED placement, earlier than anticipated timing of implantation and differential rates by hospital ownership.

Current state of the roles of alcohol septal ablation and surgical myectomy in the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a genetically determined disorder resulting in left ventricular hypertrophy. In a majority of the estimated 20 million people affected worldwide, left ventricular outflow obstruction is present at rest or with provocation. The presence and degree of obstruction influence the symptomatic presentation, treatment strategies and prognosis of affected individuals. Pharmacologic therapy with beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and calcium channel blockers is the principal treatment strategy in symptomatic patients with left ventricular outflow obstruction but is ineffective in many patients. When symptoms of exertional shortness of breath, chest pain and/or syncope prove refractory to medical therapy and there is persisting left ventricular outflow obstruction, or when there is drug intolerance, septal reduction strategies (surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation) are quite effective. Selection of the optimal septal reduction strategy for a given patient has become controversial and is determined largely by the medical system providing treatment strategies for the patient. Regretably, there are no randomized trials comparing myectomy and ablation and none are anticipated. The comprehensive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Guideline Statements published in 2011 and 2014 differ significantly with the earlier statement favoring surgical myectomy and the more recent statement giving equal class I status to the two septal reduction strategies in adult patients with drug-refractory symptoms. Recently published studies of long-term follow-up of patients after alcohol septal ablation in Europe, where surgical myectomy is rarely performed, confirm long-term safety and effectiveness with survival free of cardiac events exceeding 96% at 15 years. The lesser degree of discomfort and more rapid recovery associated with the minimally invasive catheter-based alcohol ablation procedure coupled with the recently published long-term safety data favor an increased use of this strategy in symptomatic adult patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).

Targeted Medical Therapies for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has changed considerably over the years, although molecular therapies targeting core mechanisms of the disease are still lacking. This review provides an overview of the contemporary medical approach to patients with HCM, and of promising novel developments hopefully soon to enter the clinical arena.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our perception of therapeutic targets for medical therapy in HCM is rapidly evolving. Novel approaches include myocardial metabolic modulation, late sodium current inhibition, and allosteric myosin inhibition, actively pursued to reduce and hopefully prevent the development of severe HCM phenotypes, improve symptom control, and preserve patients from disease-related complications. Clinical management of patients with HCM should be guided by in-depth knowledge of the complex mechanisms at the energetic, metabolic, and electrophysiologic level. Until new experimental therapies become available, tailored management of modifiable disease manifestations should be pursued, including lifestyle counseling and prevention of comorbidities.

Left Septal Fascicular Block Following Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

Left septal fascicular block, or blockage of the middle fibers of the left bundle branch, is known to be suggestive of a critical proximal obstruction of the left anterior descending coronary artery before its first septal perforator branch. We describe the case of a 68-year-old male who exhibited this transient intraventricular dromotropic disturbance following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Alcohol septal ablation vs myectomy for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical myectomy (SM) and Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) are effective therapies for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who remain symptomatic despite medical therapy. A plethora of data has recently emerged on the long-term outcomes of these procedures. We hence sought to perform an updated meta-analysis comparing both procedures.

METHODS

Studies reporting long-term (>3-years) outcomes of SM and/or ASA were included. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), reintervention, and complications including death, pacemaker implantation, and stroke.

RESULTS

Twenty-two ASA cohorts (n = 4213; follow-up = 6.6-years) and 23 SM cohorts (n = 4240; follow-up = 6.8-years) were included. Septal myectomy was associated with higher periprocedural mortality and stroke (2% vs 1.2%, P = 0.009 and 1.5% vs 0.8% P = 0.013, respectively), but ASA was associated with more need of pacemaker (10% vs 5%, P < 0.001). During long-term follow-up, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and sudden cardiac death rates were 1.5%, 0.4%, and 0.3% per person-year in the ASA group and 1.1%, 0.5%, and 0.3% per person-year in the SM group (P = 0.21, P = 0.53, P = 0.43), respectively. Repeat septal reduction intervention(s) were more common after ASA (11% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with SM, ASA is associated with lower periprocedural mortality and stroke but higher rates of pacemaker implantations and reintervention. However, there was no difference between ASA and SM with regards to long-term all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or SCD.