Patient perceptions and use of non-statin lipid lowering therapy among patients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Insights from the PALM registry

Lipid-lowering approaches to manage statin-intolerant patients

Statins have improved the potential to prevent cardiovascular disease events and to prolong the lives of patients. Statins, among the most widely used drugs worldwide, reduce the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by an average of 30-50%. However, non-adherence to statin therapy, due to statin intolerance, might be as high as 60% after 24 months of treatment and is associated with a 70% increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease events. Statin intolerance can be classified as a complete inability to tolerate any dose of a statin or a partial intolerance with the inability to tolerate the dose necessary to achieve the patient-specific therapeutic objective. Reasons for discontinuation are many, with statin-associated muscle symptoms being cited as the most frequent reason for stopping therapy and the incidence of muscle symptoms increasing with treatment intensity. Considering the causal effect of LDL-C in the atherosclerotic process, clinicians should consider that regardless of the lipid-lowering drugs patients are willing to take, any reduction in LDL-C they achieve will afford them some benefit in reducing cardiovascular risk. Besides statins, the current therapeutic armamentarium offers different strategies to reach LDL-C targets in statin-intolerant patients (i.e. a fixed combination between a lower dose of statin plus ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition).

Guidelines for the management of hyperlipidemia: How can clinicians effectively implement them?

Guidelines support lowering cholesterol to decrease atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk across the entire lifespan with intensive lifestyle intervention, as well as statin and non-statin pharmacotherapy for those at highest risk. Modest improvements in the initiation, use, and adherence to statin therapy in patients with ASCVD have occurred over the past decades. However, studies continue to document a less than desired implementation of guidelines highlighting a substantial and persistent treatment gap. The success of implementation depends on the consideration of a variety of barriers that exist throughout the healthcare delivery system. Further research is needed to comprehensively evaluate these barriers in order to develop appropriate and sustainable interventions to improve guideline implementation.

Patient perceptions and use of non-statin lipid lowering therapy among patients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Insights from the PALM registry

BACKGROUND

Non-statin lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) provide additional treatment options for patients. Use patterns and patient perceptions of non-statin LLT remain incompletely described.

HYPOTHESIS

The guideline-recommended statin intensity remains underutilized in patients treated with and without non-statin LLT.

METHODS

The PALM Registry collected LLT information on patients with or at risk of ASCVD treated at 125 US clinics in 2015. We compared patient perceptions, lipid levels and statin use among patients treated with and without non-statin LLT.

RESULTS

Among 7720 patients, 1930 (25.0%) were treated with a non-statin LLT (1249 fish oil, 417 fibrates, 329 ezetimibe, 196 niacin). Concurrent statin treatment occurred in 73.7%, of which 45.4% were dosed under the guideline-recommended intensity. Compared with patients on statin alone, patients receiving both a statin and non-statin LLT (n = 1423) were more likely to be male, white race and to perceive themselves as higher risk of ASCVD compared with their peers (38.5% vs. 34.9%, p = .047). Only 27.4% of patients treated with non-statin LLT alone perceived themselves at higher risk. Most (75.7%) patients treated with a non-statin LLT alone reported never being treated with a statin, despite ASCVD in 30.8% of these patients. Among those previously treated with a statin, 59.3% reported being willing to try a statin again.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-statin LLT is used in one in four patients with or at risk for ASCVD; its use is frequently in place of statin therapy or in the absence of guideline-recommended statin intensity. More work is needed to establish statins as first line therapy.