Effects of imidapril therapy on endogenous fibrinolysis in patients with recent myocardial infarction

The Interface between Inflammation and Coagulation in Cardiovascular Disease

The intimate connection between coagulation and inflammation in the pathogenesis of vascular disease has moved more and more into focus of clinical research. This paper focuses on the essential components of this interplay in the settings of cardiovascular disease and acute coronary syndrome. Tissue factor, the main initiator of the extrinsic coagulation pathway, plays a central role via causing a proinflammatory response through activation of coagulation factors and thereby initiating coagulation and downstream cellular signalling pathways. Regarding activated clotting factors II, X, and VII, protease-activated receptors provide the molecular link between coagulation and inflammation. Hereby, PAR-1 displays deleterious as well as beneficial properties. Unravelling these interrelations may help developing new strategies to ameliorate the detrimental reciprocal aggravation of inflammation and coagulation.

Role of angiotensin II in plasma PAI-1 changes induced by imidapril or candesartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome

To evaluate the relationship between plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and angiotensin II (Ang II) changes during treatment with imidapril and candesartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. A total of 84 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome were randomized to imidapril 10 mg or candesartan 16 mg for 16 weeks. At weeks 4 and 8, there was a dose titration to imidapril 20 mg and candesartan 32 mg in nonresponders (systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg). We evaluated, at baseline and after 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, clinic blood pressure, Ang II and PAI-1 antigen. Both imidapril and candesartan induced a similar SBP/DBP reduction (-19.4/16.8 and -19.5/16.3 mm Hg, respectively, P<0.001 vs. baseline). Both drugs decreased PAI-1 antigen after 4 weeks of treatment, but only the PAI-1 lowering effect of imidapril was sustained throughout the 16 weeks (-9.3 ng ml(-1), P<0.01 vs. baseline), whereas candesartan increased PAI-1 (+6.5 ng ml(-1), P<0.05 vs. baseline and P<0.01 vs. imidapril). Imidapril significantly decreased Ang II levels (-14.6 pg ml(-1) at week 16, P<0.05 vs. baseline), whereas candesartan increased them (+24.2 pg ml(-1), P<0.01 vs. baseline and vs. imidapril). In both groups there was a positive correlation between Ang II and PAI-1 changes (r=0.61, P<0.001 at week 16 for imidapril, and r=0.37, P<0.005 at week 16 for candesartan). Imidapril reduced plasma PAI-1 and Ang II levels, whereas candesartan increased them. This suggests that the different effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ang II blockers on Ang II production has a role in their different influence on fibrinolysis.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Augments Coronary Release of Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Women But Not in Men

The renin-angiotensin system regulates the vascular fibrinolytic balance. In the human forearm vasculature, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACE-Is) increase the release of t-PA through endogenous bradykinin. We tested the hypothesis that ACE inhibition and sex modulate the endogenous coronary release of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in hypertensive patients. Seventy-three patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography and had normal coronary angiograms. Thirty-three patients (21 men and 12 women) were treated with imidapril (5 mg/day) for 4 weeks (ACE-I group), and 40 (23 men and 17 women) were not treated with ACE-I (non–ACE-I group). All of the women were postmenopausal. Coronary blood flow in the left anterior descending artery was evaluated by measuring Doppler flow velocity. Net coronary t-PA release was determined as (coronary sinus−aorta gradient of t-PA)×(coronary blood flow)×[(100−hematocrit)/100]. Age, arterial pressure, heart rate, lipid levels, coronary flow, and the plasma level of t-PA at either aorta or coronary sinus were comparable among the 4 groups. In women, net t-PA release in the ACE-I group was significantly higher than that in the other groups ( P <0.05; man non–ACE-I group: 1.4±2.6 ng/mL; woman non–ACE-I group: 1.4±3.1 ng/mL; man ACE-I group: −1.8±2.8 ng/mL; woman ACE-I group: 14.8±3.6 ng/mL). Correction for smoking status gave similar results. There was a significant negative correlation between serum ACE activity and coronary t-PA release in women ( r =−0.38; P <0.05) but not in men. ACE inhibition increases coronary release of t-PA in women but not in men.

Imidapril

Imidapril (Tanatril), through its active metabolite imidaprilat, acts as an ACE inhibitor to suppress the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II and thereby reduce total peripheral resistance and systemic blood pressure (BP). In clinical trials, oral imidapril was an effective antihypertensive agent in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Some evidence suggests that imidapril also improves exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduces urinary albumin excretion rate in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Imidapril was well tolerated, with a lower incidence of dry cough than enalapril or benazepril, and is a first choice ACE inhibitor for the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Is the effect of antihypertensive drugs on platelet aggregability and fibrinolysis clinically relevant?

Hypertension is associated with decreased fibrinolytic potential, mainly expressed as elevated plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels, and increased platelet aggregability, which may account in part for the increased risk of atherosclerosis and its clinical complications in hypertensive patients. The effects of antihypertensive drugs on this prothrombotic state have been investigated and controversial findings have been reported, possibly because of differences in study designs, patients selected, and methodology used. Scarce and conflicting data exist about the effects of diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the fibrinolytic system, whereas ACE inhibitors have generally been reported to improve the fibrinolytic balance by decreasing plasma PAI-1 levels, calcium channel antagonists have been shown to increase tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity, and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists seem to exert neutral effects. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists, calcium channel antagonists, and AT(1)-receptor antagonists have been reported to exert anti-aggregatory effects on platelets, while contrasting data exist about the influence of ACE inhibitors. Clinical implications of the changes induced by antihypertensive drugs on the fibrinolytic balance and platelet function are still debated. In particular, the question of whether these changes may translate into different degrees of cardiovascular protection in hypertensive patients remains unanswered. While awaiting more information from clinical trials, the choice of antihypertensive drugs, particularly in high-risk patients, should take into account effects beyond their BP-lowering efficacy. Selected agents should have a favorable, or at least neutral, impact on fibrinolytic function and platelet activity.

Effect of Imidapril and Nifedipine on??Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in??Untreated Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Imidapril is an ACE inhibitor that is licensed for use in the treatment of hypertension. Studies assessing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy are limited, especially those comparing imidapril with other antihypertensive agents.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Single-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study carried out in a district general hospital.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with untreated hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 54 years and 70% were male. Patients were randomised to treatment with either imidapril or sustained-release nifedipine over a 24-week period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE AND RESULTS

Efficacy was assessed using clinic cuff blood pressure (BP) measurement, ambulatory BP measurement and serial transthoracic echocardiography. In the nifedipine and imidapril groups, respectively, there were significant reductions in clinic BP (16.8mm Hg [20.1, 13.4] vs 11.8mm Hg [15.3, 8.4] drop in mean [95% CI] arterial pressure), ambulatory BP (9.0mm Hg [13.2, 4.9] vs 9.7mm Hg [13.8, 5.7]) and left ventricular mass index (26.4 g/m(2) [36.3, 16.5] vs 20.8 g/m(2)[27.4, 4.1]). No significant differences in effects on these parameters were noted between the nifedipine and imidapril treatment groups (p = ns). There were no significant changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, or stroke volume. Patients on imidapril were more likely to complete the study and experienced fewer adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Imidapril is a well tolerated ACE inhibitor that has been shown to be as efficacious as sustained-release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with previously untreated hypertension.

Questioning a class effect: does ACE inhibitor tissue penetration influence the degree of fibrinolytic balance alteration following an acute myocardial infarction?

There is a common belief in a class effect among angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. This is unsubstantiated for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because vascular tissue is a source of the endogenous fibrinolytic markers, and ACE inhibition in vascular tissue favorably influences the fibrinolytic system, the authors hypothesized that a high-tissue-penetrating ACE inhibitor would provide a more favorable reduction in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and an increase in tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) after AMI compared to a low-tissue-penetrating ACE inhibitor. In a randomized open-label trial, patients received the high-tissue-penetrating quinapril (n = 15) or low-tissue-penetrating enalapril (n = 15) immediately following an AMI. PAI-1 and t-PA antigen (ng/mL) were measured at baseline and through 14 days of treatment. There was no difference in baseline PAI-1 or t-PA antigen between treatments. PAI-1 antigen trended toward being lower with quinapril versus enalapril on day 1 (24.44 +/- 14.96 vs. 36.94 +/- 19.49, respectively, p = 0.059) and was significantly lower on day 3 (17.32 +/- 9.57 vs. 27.49 +/- 9.61, respectively, p = 0.009). Analysis of PAI-1 antigen over time by two-factor ANOVA with replication found significantly lower concentrations of PAI-1 antigen over the entire treatment period with quinapril versus enalapril (p < 0.003). This investigation of ACE inhibitor tissue-penetrating influence on markers of reinfarction risk suggests there may be a greater early reduction in PAI-1 with a more highly tissue-penetrating ACE inhibitor.

Pharmacologic Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System: Vascular Benefits Beyond Commonly Understood Pharmacologic Actions

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are recognized primarily for their use in hypertension, in heart failure, and after myocardial infarction. New evidence, particularly with ACE inhibitors, has shown their ability to reduce acute coronary events associated with atherosclerosis in patients without a history of the aforementioned cardiac conditions. This is likely due to inhibitory effects on the renin-angiotensin system--a system that adversely influences fibrinolytic balance, vascular endothelial function, and vascular inflammation, all key components of atherosclerotic progression and adverse coronary outcomes. Results of various studies suggest favorable effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on markers of these components, including effects on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, endothelin-1, and nitric oxide by ACE inhibitors, and effects on vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and C-reactive protein by ARBs. Although early evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors may provide a greater beneficial effect on some of these markers compared with ARBs, and that certain ACE inhibitors may provide greater vascular benefits than others, further investigation is required to verify such findings. Overall, understanding the distinct coronary vascular benefits of these agents will emphasize the importance of using them, particularly ACE inhibitors, to improve outcomes in patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease.

Protection of the cardiovascular system by imidapril, a versatile angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

Imidapril hydrochloride (imidapril) is a long-acting, non-sulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which has been used clinically in the treatment of hypertension, chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and diabetic nephropathy. It has the unique advantage over other ACE inhibitors in causing a lower incidence of dry cough. After oral administration, imidapril is rapidly converted in the liver to its active metabolite imidaprilat. The plasma levels of imidaprilat gradually increase in proportion to the dose, and decline slowly. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T(max)) is 2.0 h for imidapril and 9.3 h for imidaprilat. The elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of imidapril and imidaprilat is 1.7 and 14.8 h, respectively. Imidapril and its metabolites are excreted chiefly in the urine. As an ACE inhibitor, imidaprilat is as potent as enalaprilat, an active metabolite of enalapril, and about twice as potent as captopril. In patients with hypertension, blood pressure was still decreased at 24 h after imidapril administration. The antihypertensive effect of imidapril was dose-dependent. The maximal reduction of blood pressure and plasma ACE was achieved with imidapril, 10 mg once daily, and the additional effect was not prominent with higher doses. When administered to patients with AMI, imidapril improved left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. In patients with mild-to-moderate CHF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-III], imidapril increased exercise time and physical working capacity and decreased plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNP levels in a dose-related manner. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, imidapril decreased urinary albumin excretion. Interestingly, imidapril improved asymptomatic dysphagia in patients with a history of stroke. In the same patients it increased serum substance P levels, while the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan was ineffective. These studies indicate that imidapril is a versatile ACE inhibitor. In addition to its effectiveness in the treatment of hypertension, CHF, and AMI, imidapril has beneficial effects in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and asymptomatic dysphagia. Good tissue penetration and inhibition of tissue ACE by imidapril contributes to its effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular complications of hypertension. The major advantages of imidapril are its activity in the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases and lower incidence of cough compared with some of the older ACE inhibitors.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1: physiologic role, regulation, and the influence of common pharmacologic agents

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is the major inhibitor of endogenous thrombolysis, thereby promoting thrombosis. PAI-1 is also a primary contributor to the development and recurrence of acute myocardial infarction. The renin angiotensin system, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, and estrogen all influence the fibrinolytic system and PAI-1 in particular. Available data strongly suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and hormone replacement therapy with estrogen beneficially reduce PAI-1 production. Metformin, an agent commonly used for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), appears to favorably decrease PAI-1 production in NIDDM patients but not nondiabetic patients. Among the cholesterol-lowering statins, clinical literature evaluating pravastatin provides the most compelling data to support this agent's favorable effect on PAI-1. Other available statins either have not displayed an effect on PAI-1 or do not have clear data to conclusively define their effects on the fibrinolytic system.

Fosinopril versus amlodipine comparative treatments study: a randomized trial to assess effects on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

BACKGROUND

ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists may modulate fibrinolysis. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of these drugs on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen, an inhibitor of fibrinolysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Participants with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=96, 51% black) were randomized after an initial 4 weeks of placebo to double-blind 20 or 40 mg fosinopril or 5 or 10 mg amlodipine daily for 4 weeks in a fixed-dose regimen. After 4 weeks of placebo washout, the patients received 4 weeks of crossover treatments. After treatment with placebo, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 143+/-2 and 86+/-1 mm Hg and plasma PAI-1 was 43.4+/-2.3 ng/mL. Amlodipine achieved a greater systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction than fosinopril (10 mm Hg versus 8 mm Hg, P=0.029, and 5 mm Hg versus 3 mm Hg, P=0.040, respectively) but tended to increase PAI-1, whereas fosinopril tended to decrease PAI-1 (5.4+/-3.6 versus -3.8+/-2.5 ng/mL, P=0.045). The PAI-1 changes depended on drug dose (6.5+/-6.1 and 3.4+/-3.9 ng/mL with amlodipine 10 and 5 mg, respectively, and -0.4+/-3.1 and -7.4+/-4.0 ng/mL with fosinopril 20 and 40 mg, respectively, P for trend 0.024). No significant differences between fosinopril and amlodipine were found for short-term changes in tissue plasminogen activator antigen, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. The findings were similar in black and white participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term treatment with fosinopril significantly reduced PAI-1 compared with amlodipine in a dose-dependent fashion. This effect, which was independent of blood pressure reduction, may account for the improved clinical outcomes achieved with ACE inhibitors compared with calcium antagonists.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 in cardiovascular disease. Status report 2001

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) is known to contribute to thrombus formation and to the development and the clinical course of acute and chronic cardiovascular disease, as well as of other arterial and venous thromboembolic diseases. Recently, an important role of elevated pretreatment levels of PAI-1 for failure of thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction has been discussed. PAI-1 plasma levels depend on the one hand on gene regulation but are related on the other hand to known risk factors of atherosclerosis like insulin resistance, diabetes or hypertriglyceridemia, respectively. Furthermore, an activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) significantly contributes to the upregulation of PAI-1 concentration via a receptor-mediated mechanism. In accordance to the known mechanisms of regulation of PAI-1 plasma levels, the use of specific agents like antidiabetic drugs, fibrates, statins, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type-1 receptor-blockers may contribute to the downregulation of circulating PAI-1 and, therefore, increase the fibrinolytic capacity and consecutively counteract the thrombotic tendency. To further improve the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy, a PAI-1 resistant variant of t-PA, TNK-t-PA, has been developed and is now available for acute myocardial infarction.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (part one): basic mechanisms, regulation, and role for thromboembolic disease

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) is a rapid inhibitor of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in circulation. Evidence suggests that the PAI-1 concentration is responsible for the regulation of the endogenous fibrinolytic system through its tPA/PAI-1 interactions. Accordingly, increased levels of PAI-1 have emerged as a masker for an increased thrombolic risk. This article represents a status report of mechanism of action, regulation of plasma levels, as well as the role of PAI-1 in arterial and venous thromboembolic disease.

Effects of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system on tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 synthesis in human cultured monocytes

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the pathophysiological significance of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in monocytes, we examined the effect of its blockade on tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) synthesis in human cultured monocytes.

METHODS

Monocytes were isolated from healthy volunteers and cultured. Tissue factor and PAI-1 antigens in culture medium and cells were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting, and mRNA levels were assessed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

We show that the RAS is present in isolated human peripheral blood monocytes. Exogenous angiotensin II increased the levels of tissue factor antigen and mRNA in cultured monocytes, but not of PAI-1 synthesis. An angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (captopril) and an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist (candesartan) decreased the levels of tissue factor protein and mRNA in cultured monocytes. These alterations were accompanied by a reduction in the levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha protein and mRNA. The levels of PAI-1 protein were reduced by captopril, but not by candesartan. A bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist abolished the suppressive effect of captopril on PAI-1 antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

An ACE inhibitor and an AT1 receptor antagonist reduced tissue factor synthesis in these cells. We show different actions of these agents on PAI-1 synthesis. ACE inhibition decreased PAI-1 synthesis mediated by bradykinin production, but AT1 receptor inhibition had no effect.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reduces monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and tissue factor levels in patients with myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effects of enalapril therapy on plasma tissue factor (TF), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Macrophages express TF in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Both TF and TFPI are major regulators of coagulation and thrombosis. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is a monocyte and macrophage chemotactic and activating factor.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study beginning about two weeks after myocardial infarction, 16 patients received four weeks of placebo (placebo group) and another 16 patients received four weeks of enalapril 5 mg daily therapy (enalapril group). We performed blood sampling after administration of the doses.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity, plasma TF, free TFPI or MCP-1 levels before administration between the enalapril and placebo groups. In the enalapril group, ACE activity (IU/liter) (14.0 before, 5.2 on day 3, 5.8 on day 7, 6.3 on day 28), TF levels (pg/ml) (223, 203, 182, 178) and MCP-1 levels (pg/ml) (919, 789, 790, 803) significantly decreased by day 28. However, the free TFPI levels (ng/ml) (28.2, 26.5, 26.8, 28.4) did not change. These four variables were unchanged during the study period in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that administration of enalapril reduces the increased procoagulant activity in patients with myocardial infarction associated with inhibition of the activation and accumulation of macrophages and monocytes.

Angiotensin IV stimulates plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in proximal tubular epithelial cells

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II (Ang II) has been shown to be implicated in the development of renal fibrosis in several forms of chronic glomerulonephritides, but the precise mechanisms of its effects remain unclear. It has recently been reported that Ang II stimulates the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in several cell lines. PAI-1 is a major physiological inhibitor of the plasminogen activator/plasmin system, a key regulator of fibrinolysis and extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover. PAI-1 induction by Ang II in endothelial cells seems to be mediated by Ang IV via a receptor that is different from Ang II type 1 and 2 receptors (AT1 and AT2).

METHODS

In this study, we sought to evaluate the effects of Ang IV on PAI-1 gene and protein expression in a well-characterized and immortalized human proximal tubular cell line (HK2) by Northern blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Ang IV stimulated PAI-1 mRNA expression, whereas it did not induce a significant increase in tritiated thymidine uptake after 24 hours of incubation. This effect was dose and time dependent. Ang IV (10 nM) induced a 7.8 +/- 3.3-fold increase in PAI-1 mRNA expression. The PAI-1 antigen level was significantly higher in conditioned media and the ECM of cells treated with Ang II and Ang IV than in control cells (both P < 0.02). Although Ang II induced a 4.2 +/- 2. 1-fold increase in PAI-1 mRNA expression, its effect underwent a dose-dependent reduction when amastatin, a potent inhibitor of the endopeptidases that catalyzes the conversion of Ang II to Ang IV, was added. In contrast, amastatin was not able to prevent the expression of PAI-1 mRNA induced by Ang IV. Finally, pretreatment of HK2 cells with losartan and N-Nicotinoyl-Tyr-N3-(Nalpha-CBZ-Arg)-Lys-His-Pro-Ile, the specific antagonists of AT1 and AT2 receptors, failed to modify PAI-1 mRNA expression as induced by Ang II.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that Ang II stimulates PAI-1 mRNA expression and the production of its protein in human proximal tubular cells. This is mainly-if not exclusively-due to Ang IV, which acts on a receptor that is different than AT1 or AT2. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that the induction of PAI-1 by Ang IV may be implicated in the pathogenesis of renal interstitial fibrosis in several forms of chronic glomerulonephritides.