The Importance of k-Space Trajectory on Off-Resonance Artifact in Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging

A comprehensive comparison between shortest-path HARP refinement, SinMod, and DENSEanalysis processing tools applied to CSPAMM and DENSE images

We addressed comprehensively the performance of Shortest-Path HARP Refinement (SP-HR), SinMod, and DENSEanalysis using 2D slices of synthetic CSPAMM and DENSE images with realistic contrasts obtained from 3D phantoms. The three motion estimation techniques were interrogated under ideal and no-ideal conditions (with MR induced artifacts, noise, and through-plane motion), considering several resolutions and noise levels. Under noisy conditions, and for isotropic pixel sizes of 1.5 mm and 3.0 mm in CSPAMM and DENSE images respectively, the nRMSE obtained for the circumferential and radial strain components were 10.7 ± 10.8% and 25.5 ± 14.8% using SP-HR, 11.9 ± 2.5% and 29.3 ± 6.5% using SinMod, and 6.4 ± 2.0% and 18.2 ± 4.6% using DENSEanalysis. Overall, the results showed that SP-HR tends to fail for large tissue motions, whereas SinMod and DENSEanalysis gave accurate displacement and strain field estimations, being the last which performed the best.

Magnetic resonance elastography for estimating in vivo stiffness of the abdominal aorta using cardiac-gated spin-echo echo-planar imaging: a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-derived aortic stiffness is a potential biomarker for multiple cardiovascular diseases. Currently, gradient-recalled echo (GRE) MRE is a widely accepted technique to estimate aortic stiffness. However, multi-slice GRE MRE requires multiple breath-holds (BHs), which can be challenging for patients who cannot consistently hold their breath. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a multi-slice spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MRE sequence for quantifying in vivo aortic stiffness using a free-breathing (FB) protocol and a single-BH protocol.

METHOD

On Scanner 1, 25 healthy subjects participated in the validation of FB SE-EPI against FB GRE. On Scanner 2, another 15 healthy subjects were recruited to compare FB SE-EPI with single-BH SE-EPI. Among all volunteers, five participants were studied on both scanners to investigate the inter-scanner reproducibility of FB SE-EPI aortic MRE. Bland-Altman analysis, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) and coefficient of variation (COV) were evaluated. The phase-difference signal-to-noise ratios (PD SNR) were compared.

RESULTS

Aortic MRE using FB SE-EPI and FB GRE yielded similar stiffnesses (paired t-test, P = 0.19), with LCCC = 0.97. The FB SE-EPI measurements were reproducible (intra-scanner LCCC = 0.96) and highly repeatable (LCCC = 0.99). The FB SE-EPI MRE was also reproducible across different scanners (inter-scanner LCCC = 0.96). Single-BH SE-EPI scans yielded similar stiffness to FB SE-EPI scans (LCCC = 0.99) and demonstrated a low COV of 2.67% across five repeated measurements.

CONCLUSION

Multi-slice SE-EPI aortic MRE using an FB protocol or a single-BH protocol is reproducible and repeatable with advantage over multi-slice FB GRE in reducing acquisition time. Additionally, FB SE-EPI MRE provides a potential alternative to BH scans for patients who have challenges in holding their breath.