Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above

Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

RESULTS

European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.

Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary interventional treatment occurs in approximately one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Next-generation imaging (NGI) can identify local and metastatic recurrence with greater sensitivity than conventional imaging, potentially allowing for more effective interventions. This narrative review examines the current clinical evidence on the utility of NGI for patients with BCR.

METHODS

A search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on NGI applied to BCR. Given other relevant recent reviews on the topic, this review focused on papers published between January 2018 to May 2023.

RESULTS

NGI technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated increased sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing BCR at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations <2.0 ng/ml. Detection rates range between 46% and 50%, with decreasing PSA levels for choline (1-3 ng/ml), fluciclovine (0.5-1 ng/ml), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (0.2-0.49 ng/ml) PET radiotracers. Expert working groups and European and US medical societies recommend NGI for patients with BCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data support the improved detection performance and selectivity of NGI modalities versus conventional imaging techniques; however, limited clinical evidence exists demonstrating the application of NGI to treatment decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes. The emergence of NGI and displacement of conventional imaging may require a reexamination of the current definitions of BCR, altering our understanding of early recurrence. Redefining the BCR disease state by formalizing the role of NGI in patient management decisions will facilitate greater alignment across research efforts and better reflect the published literature.

Assessment of PSMA Expression of Healthy Organs in Different Stages of Prostate Cancer Using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET Examinations

The efficacy of radioligand therapy (RLT) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is currently being investigated for its application in patients with early-stage prostate cancer (PCa). However, little is known about PSMA expression in healthy organs in this cohort. Collectively, 202 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 152 patients were studied. Of these, 102 PET scans were from patients with primary PCa and hormone-sensitive biochemically recurrent PCa and 50 PET scans were from patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) before and after three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. PSMA-standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured in multiple organs and PSMA-total tumor volume (PSMA-TTV) was determined in all cohorts. The measured PET parameters of the different cohorts were normalized to the bloodpool and compared using t- or Mann-Whitney U tests. Patients with early-stage PCa had lower PSMA-TTVs (10.39 mL vs. 462.42 mL, p < 0.001) and showed different SUVs in the thyroid, submandibular glands, heart, liver, kidneys, intestine, testes and bone marrow compared to patients with advanced CRPC, with all tests showing p < 0.05. Despite the differences in the PSMA-TTV of patients with mCRPC before and after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (462.42 mL vs. 276.29 mL, p = 0.023), no significant organ differences in PET parameters were detected. These suggest different degrees of PSMA-ligand binding among patients with different stages of PCa that could influence radiotoxicity during earlier stages of disease in different organs when PSMA-RLT is administered.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) plays an important role in the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive treatment. The objective of this study is to summarize the efficacy and toxicity of HDR-BT in these patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE from inception to July 2023. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) in different subgroups, and the secondary endpoint was gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. A semi-automated tool (WebPlotDigitizer) and a new Shiny application combined with R software (R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.R-project.org/ ) helped to reconstruct survival curves.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, including 1447 patients. A total of 761 patients from 13 studies were included in survival reconstruction, and the median RFS time was 61.2 months (57.6-72.0 months). The estimated 2‑, 3‑, and 5‑year rates were 75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.8 ~ 79.2%), 66.7% (95% CI 63.0 ~ 70.5%), and 52.3% (95% CI 47.5 ~ 57.4%), respectively. Whole-gland irradiation with multiple fractions (≥ 2 F) resulted in better RFS compared with focal gland irradiation with fewer fractions (1 F mostly; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77, p < 0.0001). According to the different median time from primary treatment to salvage therapy (TRS) and median age at recurrence, short median TRS (56-67.2 months vs. 70-120 months; HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.68-0.40; p < 0.0001) and younger median age (60-70 years vs. 71-75 years; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74; p < 0.0001) were positive factors for RFS. The cumulative incidences estimated for grade ≥ 3 acute and late GU toxicities were 1% (95% CI 0 ~ 1%) and 5% (95% CI 4 ~ 7%), respectively. Three patients (3/992) experienced grade ≥ 3 late GI toxicity, and no cases of grade ≥ 3 acute GI toxicity were reported.

CONCLUSION

HDR-BT has a high safety profile and good RFS benefit for salvage treatment of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. In terms of RFS, whole-gland irradiation with multiple fractions seems to be better than focal gland irradiation with fewer fractions, while short TRS and younger age are good prognostic factors. In view of the low level of evidence in the included studies and the large heterogeneity of each study, these conclusions still need to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

Therapeutic Approaches to Targeting Androgen Receptor Splice Variants

Therapeutic options for advanced prostate cancer have vastly expanded over the last decade and will continue to expand in the future. Drugs targeting the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway, i.e., androgen receptor targeting agents (ARTAs), remain the mainstream treatments that are increasingly transforming the disease into one that can be controlled for an extended period of time. Prostate cancer is inherently addicted to AR. Under the treatment pressure of ARTA, molecular alterations occur, leading to the clonal expansion of resistant cells in a disease state broadly categorized as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). One castration resistance mechanism involves AR splice variants (AR-Vs) lacking the ligand-binding domain. Some AR-Vs have been identified as constitutively active, capable of activating AR signaling pathways without androgenic ligands. Among these variants, AR-V7 is the most extensively studied and may be measured non-invasively using validated circulating tumor cell (CTC) tests. In the context of the evolving prostate cancer treatment landscape, novel agents are developed and evaluated for their efficacy in targeting AR-V7. In patients with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), the availability of the AR-V7 tests will make it possible to determine whether the treatments are effective for CTC AR-V7-positive disease, even though the treatments may not be specifically designed to target AR-V7. In this review, we will first outline the current prostate cancer treatment landscape, followed by an in-depth review of relatively newer prostate cancer therapeutics, focusing on AR-targeting agents under clinical development. These drugs are categorized from the standpoint of their activities against AR-V7 through direct or indirect mechanisms.

Novel hormone therapy and coordination of care in high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-50% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing primary definitive treatment. Patients with high-risk BCR have an increased risk of metastatic progression and subsequent PCa-specific mortality, and thus could benefit from treatment intensification. Given the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, multidisciplinary care (MDC) can play a crucial role in the individualized management of this patient population. This review explores the role for MDC when evaluating the clinical evidence for the evolving definition of high-risk BCR and the emerging therapeutic strategies, especially with novel hormone therapies (NHTs), for patients with either high-risk BCR or oligometastatic PCa. Clinical studies have used different characteristics to define high-risk BCR and there is no consensus regarding the definition of high-risk BCR nor for management strategies. Next-generation imaging and multigene panels offer potential enhanced patient identification and precision-based decision-making, respectively. Treatment intensification with NHTs, either alone or combined with radiotherapy or metastasis-directed therapy, has been promising in clinical trials in patients with high-risk BCR or oligometastases. As novel risk-stratification and treatment options as well as evidence-based literature evolve, it is important to involve a multidisciplinary team to identify patients with high-risk features at an earlier stage, and make informed decisions on the treatments that could optimize their care and long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, MDC data are scarce in the BCR or oligometastatic setting. Efforts to integrate MDC into the standard management of this patient population are needed, and will likely improve outcomes across this heterogeneous PCa patient population.

Improved Outcomes with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with prostate cancer who have high-risk biochemical recurrence have an increased risk of progression. The efficacy and safety of enzalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy and enzalutamide monotherapy, as compared with androgen-deprivation therapy alone, are unknown.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with prostate cancer who had high-risk biochemical recurrence with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 9 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive enzalutamide (160 mg) daily plus leuprolide every 12 weeks (combination group), placebo plus leuprolide (leuprolide-alone group), or enzalutamide monotherapy (monotherapy group). The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, as assessed by blinded independent central review, in the combination group as compared with the leuprolide-alone group. A key secondary end point was metastasis-free survival in the monotherapy group as compared with the leuprolide-alone group. Other secondary end points were patient-reported outcomes and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 1068 patients underwent randomization: 355 were assigned to the combination group, 358 to the leuprolide-alone group, and 355 to the monotherapy group. The patients were followed for a median of 60.7 months. At 5 years, metastasis-free survival was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.0 to 90.6) in the combination group, 71.4% (95% CI, 65.7 to 76.3) in the leuprolide-alone group, and 80.0% (95% CI, 75.0 to 84.1) in the monotherapy group. With respect to metastasis-free survival, enzalutamide plus leuprolide was superior to leuprolide alone (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.61; P<0.001); enzalutamide monotherapy was also superior to leuprolide alone (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87; P = 0.005). No new safety signals were observed, with no substantial between-group differences in quality-of-life measures.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence, enzalutamide plus leuprolide was superior to leuprolide alone with respect to metastasis-free survival; enzalutamide monotherapy was also superior to leuprolide alone. The safety profile of enzalutamide was consistent with that shown in previous clinical studies, with no apparent detrimental effect on quality of life. (Funded by Pfizer and Astellas Pharma; EMBARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02319837.).

Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer (Stage T3)

Objective

Formerly, locally advanced prostate cancer exhibited poorly prognosis. In the late 1990s, new surgical and radiation technologies were introduced in combination with androgen deprivation. To evaluate respective strategies, outcomes were examined.

Patients and methods

Between 2001 and 2010, 224 patients with T3N0M0 (10.9% of all prostate cancer cases) were treated with prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with/without androgen deprivation or hormone alone. Complete records were obtained by the end of 2015.

Results

Operation group first started without adjuvant treatment and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse occurred in 39% of cases. Radiation therapy group was alternatively divided into two subgroups, that received either monotherapy or combination with androgen deprivation, and PSA relapse rates were 65 and 16%, respectively. High rates of PSA relapse in both the operation and radiation therapy groups were observed in patients without adjuvant therapy, but after relapse androgen deprivation proceeded favorable outcomes. In the radiation subgroups, PSA relapse rates were different, but both subsequent survival rates were the same. This may be due to the effect of androgen deprivation after relapse, indicating effect of delayed therapy. PSA relapse rate in the hormone therapy group was 25% and after relapse, patients applied to treatment with other hormonal and anticancer drugs. Overall survival rates were 91, 88 and 67% in the operation, radiation therapy and hormone therapy groups, respectively.

Conclusion

Aggressive treatment with short-term androgen deprivation for locally advanced prostate cancer could be beneficial and not harmful when suitable candidates are selected. Delayed androgen deprivation was effective for no adjuvant patients after PSA relapse.

[Focal dose escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer : Long-term results of HDR brachytherapy]

BACKGROUND

We prospectively examined the effect and the safety of intensity-modulated HDR brachytherapy (IMBT) with focal dose escalation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 139 patients undergoing primary therapy for prostate cancer and 11 patients with recurrence were included. Data analysis focused on the following factors: date of primary diagnosis, Gleason score, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, PSA nadir, volume of the prostate in the transrectal ultrasound, biopsy of the prostate gland, androgen deprivation, chemotherapy, uroflowmetry, pre- and postoperative post-void residual urine (PVR), number of the needles in the prostate lobes and analysis of follow-up data.

RESULTS

In the primary therapy group, 87.6 % of the patients had a PSA of 0-4 ng/ml at the time of follow-up, while in the recurrence group 81.8 % of patients were within this range. Overall, 55.8 % of patients in the primary group had a PSA nadir under 0.1 ng/ml, 37.2 % under 1 ng/ml, 5.8 % under 5 ng/ml and 1.2 % (1 patient) over 5 ng/ml. In the recurrence group, 100 % had a PSA nadir under 0.1 ng/dl. Fifty patients of the primary group reported grade 1 toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria): 29 localized to the bladder and 21 to the rectum. Seventeen patients had grade 2 toxicity of the bladder and 1 patient had grade 3 toxicity of the bladder. Finally there was one grade 4 toxicity due to perforation of the sigmoid colon. In the recurrence group, 3 patients with grade 1 toxicity were observed (2 bladder and 1 bowl). Also 3 patients had grade 2 toxicity of the bladder, 1 patient had a grade 3 bladder toxicity and 1 patient had grade 4 toxicity due to bowl fistula. There were no grade 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

The modifications of the "Kiel method" with focal dose escalation was proven as effective in locally advanced prostate carcinoma and in local recurrences of the disease with low level toxicity.

Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients

PURPOSE

Comparative data related to the use of open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remain limited. We determined outcomes of open radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP), and robot-assisted RP (RARP) in matched cohorts of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 805 patients with high-risk PCa [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥8, or clinical stage ≥cT2c] were identified. A total of 407 RRP cases were propensity score (PS) matched 1:1 to 398 LRP or RARP cases to yield 3 cohorts (RARP, LRP, and RRP) of 110 patients each for analysis. PS matching variables included the following: age, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score, surgeon experience, and nerve-sparing technique. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared with log-rank test. RFS predictor analysis was calculated within Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Pathological Gleason scores <7, =7, and >7 were found in 3.3, 50.9, and 45.8 % of patients. There were no statistically significant differences for pathological stage and positive surgical margins between surgical techniques. Mean 3-year RFS was 41.4, 77.9, and 54.1 %, for RARP, LRP, and RRP, respectively (p < 0.0001 for RARP vs. LRP). There were no significant differences for mean estimated 3-year OS for patients treated with RARP, LRP, or RRP (95.4, 98.1, and 100 %).

CONCLUSIONS

RARP demonstrated similar oncologic outcomes compared to RRP and LRP in a PS-matched cohort of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze pathological and short-term oncological outcomes in men undergoing open and minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) for high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC; prostate-specific antigen level [PSA] >20 ng/mL, ≥ cT2c, Gleason score 8-10) in a contemporaneous series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 913 patients with HRPC were identified in the Johns Hopkins Radical Prostatectomy Database subsequent to the inception of MIRP at this institution (2002-2011) Of these, 743 (81.4%) underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORRP), 105 (11.5%) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) and 65 (7.1%) underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for HRPC. Appropriate comparative tests were used to evaluate patient and prostate cancer characteristics. Proportional hazards regression models were used to predict biochemical recurrence.

RESULTS

Age, race, body mass index, preoperative PSA level, clinical stage, number of positive cores and Gleason score at final pathology were similar between ORRP and MIRP. On average, men undergoing MIRP had smaller prostates and more organ-confined (pT2) disease (P = 0.02). The number of surgeons and surgeon experience were greatest for the ORRP cohort. Overall surgical margin rate was 29.4%, 34.3% and 27.7% (P = 0.52) and 1.9%, 2.9% and 6.2% (P = 0.39) for pT2 disease in men undergoing ORRP, RALRP and LRP, respectively. Biochemical recurrence-free survival among ORRP, RALRP and LRP was 56.3%, 67.8% and 41.1%, respectively, at 3 years (P = 0.6) and the approach employed did not predict biochemical recurrence in regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

At an experienced centre, MIRP is comparable to open radical prostatectomy for HRPC with respect to surgical margin status and biochemical recurrence.

Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer defined by preoperative criteria: oncologic follow-up in national multicenter study in 813 patients and assessment of easy-to-use prognostic substratification

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of predictive factors for oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A total of 813 patients underwent RP for high-risk PCa in a national retrospective multi-institutional study. High-risk PCa was defined as follows: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level>20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical Stage T2c-T4 disease. The preoperative criteria of high-risk PCa were studied in a logistic regression model to assess the correlations with the pathologic findings in the RP specimens. The predictive factors isolated or combined in scores were assessed by Cox multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses in predicting PSA failure (recurrence-free survival [RFS]) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 64 months. Organ-confined disease was reported in 36.5%. The 5-year RFS, metastasis-free survival, and OS rate was 74.1%, 96.1%, and 98.6%, respectively. Each preoperative criteria of high-risk PCa was an independent predictor of PSA failure. The PSA failure risk was increased by 1.5- and 2.8-fold in men with 2 and 3 criteria, respectively. The RFS, but not the OS, was significantly different according to the preoperative score (P<.001). The postoperative score was significantly predictive for RFS and OS (P<.001 and P<.035, respectively). The risk of PSA failure was significantly increased with an increasing postoperative score (2-4.6-fold).

CONCLUSION

National data support evidence that RP can result in encouraging midterm oncologic outcomes for the management of high-risk PCa. At 5 years after surgery, 75% of patients remain disease free. Our easy-to-use risk stratification might help clinicians to better predict the clinical and PSA outcomes of high-risk patients after surgery.

Role of surgery in high-risk localized prostate cancer

Men with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) remain a challenge for clinicians. Until recently, surgery was not the preferred approach, in part because risk of subclinical metastatic disease, elevated rates of positive surgical margins, absence of randomized studies, and suboptimal cancer control did not justify the morbidity of surgery. No randomized data comparing surgery with radiation therapy are yet available. Data for and comparisons between treatment options should therefore be analyzed with extreme caution.When selecting the best treatment for patients with clinically localized high-risk PCa, considerations should include the life expectancy of the patient, the natural history of PCa, the curability of the disease, and the morbidity of treatment. High-grade PCa managed with noncurative intent greatly reduces life expectancy, but overall, it must also be remembered that radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) appear to have similar effects on quality of life. In this population, RP necessitates an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), but in selected cases, nerve-sparing is a therapeutic possibility and may offer a significant advantage over rt in terms of local control and-although absolutely not yet proved-maybe even in survival. One clear advantage is the ease of administering adjuvant or salvage external-beam rt (EBRT) after rp; conversely, salvage rp after failed EBRT is an exceedingly difficult surgery, with major complications. Surgery therefore has its place, but must be considered in the context of multimodality treatment and the risk of micrometastatic disease. Awaited trial results will help to further refine management in this group of patients.

Polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase genes increase risk of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence differentially by ethnicity and disease severity

Objective

Genetic polymorphisms that modify the detoxifying activity of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) can affect the level of carcinogenic metabolites created by endogenous steroid hormones and exogenous chemical substances. Although the GSTM1 null genotype has been shown to increase prostate cancer mortality in Caucasians, potential associations between GST polymorphisms and prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR) have not been well studied, particularly in African-Americans.

Methods

We examined potential associations between the GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphisms and BCR, after prostatectomy, in 168 African-American and 226 Caucasian patients treated at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

We found that African-Americans with the GSTT1 null genotype had increased BCR risk compared to those having GSTT1 present (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.01–5.18; p = 0.04); and African-Americans with the GSTT1 null genotype and high grade tumors had an even greater risk (HR = 7.82; 95% CI = 2.49–24.50; p < 0.001). In Caucasians, an increased risk was observed in those patients with high grade tumors and the GSTM1 null genotype (HR = 2.88; 95% CI = 1.16–7.14; p = 0.02). Similar associations were observed for advanced stage and more aggressive (high grade or advanced stage) disease.

Conclusion

Our results suggest GSTs may hold promise as therapeutic targets in more advanced prostate cancers, particularly, in African-Americans.

Treatment failure and clinical progression after salvage therapy in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: radiotherapy vs androgen deprivation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes between salvage radiotherapy (RT) and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), to investigate factors determining clinical progression (CP) in men with prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 121 patients with biochemical recurrence while on follow-up by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement, without adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy, received RT (45) or ADT (76). Failure after salvage therapy was defined as a PSA level of >0.2 ng/mL. Clinical, pathological and treatment factors were analysed.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological characteristics were similar between the RT and ADT groups except that men in the RT group were younger (61.4 vs 65.4 years). After ADT, salvage failed in 10 (13%) after a mean (sd) of 18.5 (4.5) months of treatment, and 6.7 months after salvage failed all patients progressed clinically. After RT, salvage failed in 22 (49%) after 30.7 (5.2) months of response. Upon RT failure, all patients received ADT, after which in three (14%) patients the treatment failed again after 20.1 months of treatment and progressed to CP after 6.5 months, while in the remaining 19 (86%) patients the PSA level remained undetectable for 37.6 (7.7) months. On multivariate analysis, pathological stage (> or =T3b) and Gleason grade 5 disease were independently prognostic of CP.

CONCLUSION

Salvage RT alone and combined with subsequent ADT provided PSA control in most patients, significantly increasing CP-free survival compared with initial ADT. Patients with a short PSA doubling time (<3 months) are at high risk of failed salvage treatment after RT, and initial ADT might be considered. Regardless of salvage method, advanced pathological stage and Gleason grade 5 were factors prognostic of CP.

Outcomes for intermediate risk prostate cancer: are there advantages for surgery, external radiation, or brachytherapy?

The treatment of localized prostate cancer remains controversial because of the lack of conclusive well-controlled or randomized studies comparing outcome of various forms of radiotherapy (RT) to radical prostatectomy (RP). We review recent results from an institutional database and prospective quality of life study comparing cancer-related and quality of live (QOL) outcomes among different treatment modalities for intermediate risk prostate cancer. The results suggest similar short-term survival but domain-specific effects on QOL after treatment with radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy.

[Current treatment in high risk and locally advanced prostate cancer]

Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer remains controversial. Treatment options include radical prostatectomy (PR), radiotherapy (RT) and hormonotherapy (HT). A Medline database search with key words "prostate cancer", "locally advanced", "high risk" and "treatment" in articles published during the last 15 years was done. Fifty one out of 329 papers were selected and reviewed. Selection criteria were a minimum of scientific evidence level of IIa, except for some specific level IV reference. Numerous randomized studies show that patients may benefit of a combined therapy with RT and HT. RP has shown its usefulness in selected cases of locally advanced prostate cancer. Results of long follow-up series are similar to those obtained with RT and HT. Furthermore, the possibility of clinical over staging is an argument in favour of RP. We perform an updated revision of every possible choice available in the treatment of these tumours.

Initial therapy with radical prostatectomy for high risk localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study provides a perspective on initial treatment in select patients with high risk, localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A select literature review was done with commentary on the philosophy of initial surgery followed by adjuvant or salvage therapies.

RESULTS

Early detection and associated stage migration identify a cadre of men with unfavorable but apparently localized prostate cancer who historically would not have been viewed as appropriate candidates for radical prostatectomy. Decreased morbidity from radical prostatectomy and data demonstrating improved outcomes in some patients treated with multimodal therapy protocols provide a rationale for including radical prostatectomy as part of an aggressive treatment plan to achieve optimal local elimination of cancer. Data suggest that radical prostatectomy and adjuvant or possibly even salvage radiation therapy may provide the best elimination of large local cancers. Whether such an approach provides results that are better than or even as good as those of the common standard of radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy remains to be seen and, if so, at what cost to the patient in terms of adverse effects. However, it is likely that optimal elimination of local disease is needed to achieve the maximum benefit from adjuvant systemic endocrine, chemotherapy or targeted treatments. In other words optimal local therapy may be necessary but not sufficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial radical prostatectomy may have a role for treating high risk localized prostate cancer.

Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) in Japan, by retrospectively analysing the clinicopathological data in patients with clinical T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by RP, as there can be prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after RP in substantially many patients, and its character can differ according to ethnic group and/or country.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 1192 patients who had a RP from 1993 to 2002 with no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and whose PSA level after RP decreased at least once to undetectable levels (<0.2 ng/mL). PSA recurrence was defined as > or = 0.20 ng/mL. The patient data were collected from the Urological Oncology Study Group, a subgroup of Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

RESULTS

The patients' median (range) age was 67 (47-83) years and their PSA level before RP was 8.7 (1.0-153) ng/mL. During the median follow-up of 45.6 months, 302 of the 1192 patients (25.3%) developed PSA recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 369 (61-2128) days after RP. A log-rank test showed that five significant clinicopathological factors were associated with PSA recurrence after RP: the percentage of prostate needle-biopsy cores with cancer, the biopsy Gleason score, PSA level before RP, pathological stage, and the Gleason score of the RP specimen (P < 0.001 for all). In multivariate analyses, the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were all independent significant predictors of PSA recurrence after RP in Japanese men.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of PSA recurrence after RP was 25.3% in Japan and the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were independent significant factors for PSA recurrence.

Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment modality for locally advanced prostate cancer: A prospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Locally advanced prostate cancer is frequently treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation because of the greater rate of extracapsular disease and the concern that radical prostatectomy (RP) may not be curative in most cases. A case for surgery for locally advanced disease may be made on the basis of a lower rate of local recurrence compared with radiotherapy in our comparative database, data suggesting a survival advantage with pelvic lymph node dissection in those with positive nodes, and the observation of improved survival in those with metastatic disease treated by RP compared with radiotherapy. We report on the feasibility of RP as a primary treatment modality for locally advanced disease.

METHODS

A total of 281 consecutive patients treated by RP between January 1998 and June 2004 were reviewed. Locally advanced disease was defined as clinical Stage T2b or worse, prostate-specific antigen level greater than 15 ng/mL, and/or a Gleason score of 8 or greater. Data on the pathologic characteristics, operative complications, and follow-up were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional review board-approved database.

RESULTS

Pathologic examination demonstrated organ-confined disease in 11.7%, extracapsular extension in 56.9%, seminal vesicle involvement in 23.1%, and positive lymph nodes in 8.9%. The overall complication rate was 9.7% compared with 6.9% for all patients undergoing RP. At a mean follow-up of 34 months (range 1 to 78), 198 (70.4%) of 281 patients had an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level at the last follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

RP for locally advanced prostate cancer is feasible, with acute morbidity similar to RP for more localized disease. Furthermore, RP results in short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival similar to that of combined radiotherapy and androgen ablation.

Effect of androgen deprivation therapy in the thyroid function test of patients with prostate cancer

We have assessed the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the thyroid function test in prostate cancer patients. Serum levels of tri-iodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were determined in a cross-sectional study that included 279 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. A subset of 96 patients free of prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy became a control group and 183 patients under continuous ADT formed the study group. Sixty-four patients out of the study group were treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and 119 with LHRH agonist plus bicalutamide. The average time of ADT was 42.5 months (3-218). Results were as follows. Mean T3 level was 122.7 ng/dl (72.6-213.0) in the control group and 123.8 ng/dl (64.4-228.2) in patients under ADT, p=0.472. Mean T4 level was 7.66 (1.81-4.30) and 7.66 microg/dl (3.60-13.30), respectively, p=0.884. Mean TSH level was 1.58 (0.44-11.70) and 1.81 mU/dl (0.15-6.58), respectively, p=0.007. Mean FT4 level was 1.24 (0.80-1.90) and 1.18 ng/dl (0.80-1.90), respectively, p=0.018. No statistically significant differences between the T3, T4, TSH and FT4 serum levels were detected according to the modality of ADT. The serum level of TSH was higher than 5 mU/l in six patients (2.1%); however, all cases had a normal FT4 serum level. This mild hypothyroidism was detected in two of the 96 patients of the control group (2.1%) and in four of the 183 under ADT (2.2%). Our data show that ADT seems to alter the thyroid function test. A statistically significant increase in TSH serum level and a decrease in FT4 serum level were detected in patients under ADT. However, only a mild hypothyroidism was detected in about 2% of the patients with prostate cancer, independently of ADT.

Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy for Clinically Organ-Confined High-Grade Prostate Cancer With a Pretreatment PSA < 20 ng/mL

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of biopsy Gleason score 8 and 9 histology on biochemical outcome following a permanent prostate brachytherapy approach that includes multiple periprostatic seeds and supplemental external beam radiation. Forty-six consecutive T1c-T2b (1997 AJCC) patients with Gleason score 8 and 9 prostate cancer who were either hormone naive (33 patients) or received cytoreductive (< or =6 months) hormonal therapy (13 patients) underwent brachytherapy from June 1995 to November 2000. The median patient age was 69.7 years, with a median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 7.7 ng/mL. The median follow-up was 58 months (range 27-93 months). Forty-five of the patients were implanted with Pd-103 and 44 received supplemental external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy). Biochemical success was defined by either a PSA < or = 0.4 ng/mL after a nadir or by the ASTRO consensus definition. The actuarial 7-year biochemical disease-free survival was 84.8% using either a PSA < or = 0.4 ng/mL or the ASTRO consensus definition. The median postimplant PSA was less than 0.1 ng/mL for both the hormone naive and hormonally manipulated patients. The utilization of hormonal therapy for 6 months or less duration resulted in a statistically nonsignificant improvement in biochemical outcome (92.3% versus 81.8%, P = 0.393). When stratified by pretreatment PSA, 87.9% of patients with a pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL and 76.9% with a pretreatment PSA > 10 ng/mL (P = 0.377) remained biochemically free of disease. In multivariate analysis, none of the clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters predicted for outcome. Following a permanent prostate brachytherapy approach that used multiple periprostatic seeds, the majority of patients with clinically organ-confined Gleason score 8 and 9 prostate cancer remain biochemically free of disease with identical outcomes for both biochemical definitions of success.

Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The efficacy of a multimodality protocol using neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated using biochemical outcomes and posttreatment biopsy results.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 1994 and November 1999, 132 high-risk patients were treated with combined hormonal therapy (9 months), permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy, and external beam RT, with follow-up ranging from 36 to 88 months (median, 50 months). The eligibility criteria were any of the following: Gleason score 8-10, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >20 ng/mL, clinical Stage T2c-T3, or positive seminal vesicle biopsy, or two or more of the following: Gleason score 7, PSA level >10-20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b. Twenty percent of patients had a positive seminal vesicle biopsy before therapy. Negative laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections were performed in 44% of patients.

RESULTS

The actuarial overall freedom from PSA failure rate was 86% at 5 years. The freedom from PSA failure rate at 5 years was 97% for those with a Gleason score of < or =6 (35 of 36), 85% for a Gleason score of 7 (50 of 59), and 76% for a Gleason score of 8-10 (28 of 37; p = 0.03). A trend was noted toward worse outcomes in seminal vesicle biopsy-positive patients, with a 5-year freedom from PSA failure rate of 74% vs. 89% for all other patients (p = 0.06). Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 47 patients and were negative in 96% at the first biopsy and 100% at the last biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Trimodality therapy with androgen suppression, brachytherapy, and external beam RT for high-risk prostate cancer results in excellent biochemical and pathologically confirmed local control.

Effect of adjuvant androgen deprivation on thyroid function tests in prostate cancer patients

Androgen deprivation (AD) used in the treatment of prostate cancer is known to alter concentrations of sex hormones and their binding globulins. Less is known as to its effect on thyroid hormones. In this prospective study the effects of AD on thyroid function were clarified. Levels of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid binding globulin concentrations were measured in prostate cancer patients treated with either radical radiotherapy and androgen deprivation for 12 months (AD) or radical radiotherapy alone (RT). Measurements were made at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months. At baseline and at 3 months the results of thyroid function tests did not differ significantly between groups. A significant decline in serum testosterone in the AD group was accompanied by a significant decline in FT4 at 6 and 12 months, while no significant changes in thyroid function were observed in the RT group. The decline in FT4 among AD patients did not evoke a normal TSH response. Prolonged use of AD hampers the interpretation of thyroid test results. This finding has substantial implications for the follow-up of patients in hormonally treated prostate cancer.

Short-term androgen deprivation and PSA doubling time: their association and relationship to disease progression after radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between PSA doubling time (PSADT) and initial management of prostate cancer with short-term androgen deprivation (STAD) and the impact of these factors on disease progression after radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1989 and October 1998, 284 patients treated with 3D-CRT experienced biochemical failure (BF) as defined under the ASTRO consensus statement. All patients had sufficient follow-up data for PSADT calculations. Linear regression was used to assess predictors of PSADT among STAD, time to biochemical failure (TTBF), Gleason Score, tumor stage, dose, posttreatment PSA nadir, pretreatment PSA, and age. A composite covariate was created from the various combinations of factors found to be predictive of PSADT. The composite covariate was then included, along with PSADT and the factors previously mentioned, in proportional hazards modeling of freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Fifty-four (19%) patients developed distant metastasis, 20 (7%) died of prostate cancer, and 53 (19%) died of any cause. The median PSADT was 12 months. Predictors of a longer PSADT were TTBF >12 months, Gleason Score 2-6, and STAD. An ordinal composite covariate was created with eight levels on the basis of the magnitude of observed mean PSADT within the eight possible combinations of the three dichotomized predictors. The most significant predictor of higher FDM rates in Cox modeling was the composite covariate, followed by longer PSADT, STAD, lower PSA nadir, higher RT dose, and Gleason Score 2-6. Predictors of higher CSS rates were lower nadir, longer PSADT, T1/T2ab tumors, the composite covariate, and STAD. The most significant predictor of a higher OS rate was STAD, followed by longer PSADT, younger age at diagnosis, the composite covariate, lower nadir, and T1/T2ab tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer TTBF, Gleason Score 2-6 tumors, and STAD were predictive of longer PSADT. Even after adjusting for these factors in the capacity of their predictive properties for PSADT, STAD and observed PSADT continued to be significant independent predictors of FDM, CSS, and OS. STAD appears to have a pronounced impact on disease progression, probably the result partly of the prolongation of PSADT.

Prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy

Today, more men than ever before are being followed after radical prostatectomy. Prognosis and follow-up should be based on the pathologic specimen. Measurable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after surgery defines failure, with time to detectable PSA and rate of PSA rise being useful prognostic factors. The natural history of untreated biochemical failure is protracted, a fact to be considered in discussions of adjuvant treatment. Early in disease recurrence, imaging studies to locate residual disease rarely are useful clinically. Both adjuvant and salvage radiation to the prostate bed have benefits and risks, but neither is superior in overall prostate cancer survival. The timing of hormone therapy remains largely empiric. The promise of effective cytotoxic chemotherapy still is greater than its actual benefits, although novel cytostatic agents are being developed. The future management of this disease will improve with better molecular definition of risk and therapeutic response.

Localized prostate cancer: radiation or surgery?

The treatment of localized prostate cancer remains controversial because of the lack of conclusive well-controlled or randomized studies comparing outcomes of radiotherapy to outcomes of radical prostatectomy. A comparison of different therapies should include issues of cancer control, morbidity, quality of life (QOL), salvage of primary treatment failures, late effects, and cost. The available data suggest that these two modalities provide similar rates of cancer control at 10 years, and that except for the youngest patients, choice of therapy should be based on toxicity and QOL issues.