Sentinel lymph node versus axillary lymph node dissection for early-stage breast carcinoma: a comparison using a utility-adjusted number needed to treat analysis

Comparison of different adjuvant therapies for 9 resectable cancer types

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical benefit across adjuvant therapies for cancer treatment, including adjuvant imatinib, and to quantify the results using the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) approach.

METHOD

We reviewed studies meeting the following criteria: 1) US and European randomized clinical trial populations consisting of patients with cancer who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and were considered cancer free; 2) comparators were either placebo or no treatment; and 3) recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were reported and showed benefit with the experimental treatment. The NNT was calculated as the inverse of the difference in event rate between the study groups in each trial.

RESULTS

We identified 26 adjuvant treatment trials in 9 cancer types. With longer follow-up (3 years vs 1 year), 62.5% of treatments compared with placebo showed a decreased RFS NNT, including imatinib (7 vs 4). The largest relative decrease in RFS NNT over time was 91% (with trastuzumab or cyclophosphamide therapy). Approximately 25% of the treatments resulted in an increase in RFS NNT over time. The RFS NNT for imatinib was lower than that for all other treatments at 3 years of follow-up and lower than that for all but 2 treatments at 1 year. At both year 1 and year 3, the NNT for OS ranged from 6 to 100. Imatinib had an OS NNT of 31 at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

With longer follow-up duration, most adjuvant cancer treatments showed a decreased NNT. Imatinib had one of the lowest NNTs among the adjuvant treatments at 1 and 3 years of follow-up using the RFS data.

Clinical applications of breast pathology: management of in situ breast carcinomas and sentinel node biopsy issues

The purpose of this article is to review the current clinical management of in situ breast carcinomas, including how specific aspects of a pathology report are used in clinical decision-making, and to discuss the current role of sentinel node biopsy in management of invasive breast carcinomas and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The Application of Number Needed to Treat (NNT) to Clinical Problems in Radiotherapy

The goals of this report are: 1) to review the number needed to treat (NNT) concept, which, although well established in many sectors of medicine, is still relatively new to the radiotherapy community; 2) to discuss several clinical radiotherapy examples illustrating the inherent advantages of the NNT approach; and 3) to discuss potential future roles of the NNT concept within radiotherapy.

A multicenter cohort study to compare quality of life in breast cancer patients according to sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

This prospective multicenter study assessed and compared the impact of different surgical procedures on quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-BR-23 questionnaires were used to assess global health status (GHS), arm (BRAS) and breast (BRBS) symptom scales, before surgery, just after surgery and 6 and 12 months later. The Kruskal-Wallis test with the Bonferroni correction was used to compare scores. A mixed model analysis of variance for repeated measurements was then applied to assess the longitudinal effect of surgical modalities on QoL.

RESULTS

Before surgery, GHS (P = 0.7807) and BRAS (P = 0.7688) QoL scores were similar whatever the surgical procedure: sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), axillary node dissection (ALND) or SLNB + ALND. As compared with other surgical groups, GHS 75.91 [standard deviation (SD) = 17.44, P = 0.041] and BRAS 11.39 (SD = 15.36, P < 0.0001) were better in the SLNB group 12 months after surgery. Whatever the type of surgery, GHS decreased after surgery (P < 0.0001), but increased 6 months later (P = 0.0016). BRAS symptoms increased just after surgery (P = 0.0329) and until 6 months (P < 0.0001) before decreasing (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB improved GHS and BRAS QoL in breast cancer patients. However, surgeons must be cautious, SLNB with ALND results in a poorer QoL.

The cost-effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy in patients with intermediate thickness primary cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of wide excision (WEX) + sentinel node biopsy (SNB) compared with WEX only in patients with primary melanomas >/=1 mm in thickness.

METHODS

A Markov model was populated with probabilities of disease progression and survival from the published literature. Costs were obtained from diagnostic-related group weightings and health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

Base case analyses suggested that, over a 20-year timeframe, the mean total cost per patient receiving WEX only was AU $23,182 with 10.45 life years (LY) and 9.90 QALYs. The mean cost per patient for WEX + SNB was AU $24,045 with 10.77 LY and 10.34 QALYs. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for WEX + SNB was AU $2,770 per LY and AU $1,983 per QALY.

CONCLUSION

WEX + SNB appears to offer an improvement in health outcomes (in both LYs and QALYs) with only a slight increase in cost.

Approaching clinical problems in prostate cancer radiotherapy using the number needed to treat (NNT) technique

The goals of this article are to review the application of the number needed to treat (NNT) concept to selected clinical problems in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Particular emphasis will be placed on (1) comparison of radiotherapy with other treatment options for early-stage disease, (2) the role of hormone therapy in addition to radiotherapy over a spectrum of disease presentation, and (3) systematic comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in the post-prostatectomy setting. Limitations of NNT calculations based on non-randomized comparisons also are discussed.

Risk of decline in upper-body function and symptoms among older breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Decline in upper-body function and development of upper-body symptoms are adverse effects of breast cancer therapy and may affect functional independence, particularly among older survivors. The long-term risks and predictors are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the risk of decline in upper-body function and development of symptoms over 4 years of follow-up.

DESIGN

We used a prospective cohort design.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred and forty-four early stage breast cancer patients 65 years old or older at surgery enrolled in Rhode Island, North Carolina, Minnesota, and Los Angeles between 1996 and 1999.

MEASUREMENTS

Upper-body function and symptoms were self-reported at baseline, 6, 15 months, and annually thereafter to 51 months after surgery.

RESULTS

One half of the participants had a decline in upper-body function and one-quarter developed upper-body symptoms. Breast cancer patients were 5-fold more likely to have a decline in upper-body function over 4 years of follow-up than a similar cohort without breast cancer. Better baseline mental health protected against a decline in upper-body function (odds ratio [OR]=0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 to 0.97 for 8-point higher mental health index). Baseline obesity (OR for body mass index [BMI] > or =30 kg/m2 vs <30 kg/m2=2.5, CI=1.6 to 4.0) and axillary node dissection (OR for axillary dissection vs not=3.9, CI=1.1 to 14) predicted the development of upper-body symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care physicians should address upper-body function and symptoms with older breast cancer patients, and inform them that these complications of breast cancer treatment are common.

Two-step axillary operation increases risk of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients

An investigation of the impact of axillary surgery on arm morbidity in patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary clearance in a one-step procedure, and axillary clearance in a two-step procedure, respectively, was performed. Over a period of 2 years 438 patients with invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ underwent SLNB at our clinic. Of these 393 were interviewed on symptoms of swelling, numbness, pain, reduced strength, reduced mobility and fatigue more than 1 year postoperatively. Using a standardised symptom score system postoperative morbidity was registered and differences between the patients were compared in a logistic regression analysis. Of the 393 patients who received the questionnaire 370 responded (94%). The mean follow-up was 23.5 months (range 12-37). SLNB resulted in significantly lower arm morbidity than axillary clearance. Doing stepwise logistic regression of the data the two-step axillary clearance represented the most important influential factor of the development of arm morbidity symptoms of swelling and numbness.

Persistence of Restrictions in Quality of Life From the First to the Third Year After Diagnosis in Women With Breast Cancer

Purpose

To assess whether detriments in quality of life (QOL) among women with breast cancer persist over years.

Patients and Methods

QOL was assessed in a population-based cohort of 314 women with breast cancer from Saarland (Germany) 1 and 3 years after diagnosis and compared internally and with reference data from the general population.

Results

Three years after diagnosis, deficits in QOL were still apparent for role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning and for the symptoms of insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, and financial difficulties. Differences between breast cancer patients and women from the general population were predominantly found in younger ages. Compared with the QOL scores measured 1 year after diagnosis, only minor functional changes were observed, but recurrence of breast cancer during the follow-up interval had a deleterious effect on QOL.

Conclusion

Deficits in role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning persist over years in women with breast cancer and predominantly affect younger patients.

A critical review of variables affecting the accuracy and false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy procedures in early breast cancer

Radionuclide sentinel lymph node localization and biopsy is a staging procedure that is being increasingly used to evaluate patients with invasive breast cancer who have clinically normal axillary nodes. The most important prognostic indicator in patients with invasive breast cancer is the axillary node status, which must also be known for correct staging, and influences the selection of adjuvant therapies. The accuracy of sentinel lymph node localization depends on a number of factors, including the injection method, the operating surgeon's experience and the hospital setting. The efficacy of sentinel lymph node mapping can be determined by two measures: the sentinel lymph node identification rate and the false-negative rate. Of these, the false-negative rate is the most important, based on a review of 92 studies. As sentinel lymph node procedures vary widely, nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists must be acquainted with the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques. In this review, the factors that influence the success of different techniques are examined, and studies which have investigated false-negative rates and/or sentinel lymph node identification rates are summarized.

Does the number of lymph nodes examined in patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma have prognostic significance?

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data on the prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes examined in patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Therefore, the authors analyzed the impact of the number of tumor-free axillary lymph nodes on disease-free survival (DFS) in two distinct patient populations.

METHODS

Eight hundred thirty-three consecutive patients with breast carcinoma who underwent mastectomy between 1927 and 1987 and 1094 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma who underwent with breast-conservation therapy between 1984 and 2001 were diagnosed pathologically with negative axillary lymph node status. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to the number of lymph nodes examined: Group 1 had 1-3 lymph nodes examined, Group 2 had 4-9 lymph nodes examined, Group 3 had 10-20 lymph nodes examined, and Group 4 had >20 lymph nodes examined.

RESULTS

In the mastectomy cohort, with a median follow-up of 153 months, the 10-year DFS rate was 70%, 65%, 79%, and 81% for Groups 1-4, respectively. On multivariate analysis, pathologic tumor size (P<0.001) and the number of lymph nodes examined (P=0.010) were significant predictors for long-term DFS. In the breast-conservation cohort, with a median follow-up of 53 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 90%, 91%, 92%, and 95% for Groups 1-4, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the only predictors of DFS were method of detection (clinically vs. mammographically) (P=0.003) and tumor size (P=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The recovery of <10 lymph nodes in lymph node-negative patients who underwent mastectomy resulted in a 10-15% decreased long-term DFS rate compared with patients who had a more extensive axillary assessment. However, the number of lymph nodes examined did not have an impact on the DFS rate in a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent breast-conservation therapy, which included radiation.

Hormone therapy and radiotherapy for early prostate cancer: a utility-adjusted number needed to treat (NNT) analysis

PURPOSE

To quantify, using the number needed to treat (NNT) methodology, the benefit of short-term (< or =6 months) hormone therapy adjuvant to radiotherapy in the group of patients with early (clinical stage T1-T2c) prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The absolute biochemical control benefit for the use of hormones adjuvant to radiotherapy in early-stage disease was determined by literature review. A model was developed to estimate the utility-adjusted survival detriment due to the side effects of hormone therapy. The NNTs before and after the incorporation of hormone sequelae were computed; the sign and magnitude of the NNTs were used to gauge the effect of the hormones.

RESULTS

The absolute NNT analysis, based on summarizing the results of 8 reports including a total of 3652 patients, demonstrated an advantage to the addition of hormones for the general early-stage prostate cancer population as well as for all prognostic groups. After adjustment for hormone-induced functional loss, the advantage of hormones remained considerable in the high- and intermediate-risk groups, with the utility-adjusted NNT becoming weakened in the low-risk group when the utility compromise from complications of hormones was assumed to be considerable.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term hormone therapy seems to be beneficial for selected early-stage prostate cancer patients. The advantage seems to be greatest in the intermediate- and high-risk groups; with current follow-up, the side effects of hormones may outweigh their benefit in certain clinical situations in the favorable group. The present investigation demonstrates the significant role of the NNT technique for oncologic and radiotherapeutic management decisions when treatment complications need to be considered and balanced with the beneficial effects of the treatment.

Postprostatectomy adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) has been used with success after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), both in the adjuvant and salvage settings. The purpose of the current investigation was to systematically compare adjuvant versus salvage RT in a manner that incorporates both treatment efficacy and complications.

METHODS

A literature review was performed of reports of post-RRP salvage and adjuvant RT, and 12 trials comprising 1060 patients met the appropriate inclusion criteria. The biochemical failure-free survival in each study/arm was tabulated, and these values were entered into a model to compute an unadjusted number-needed-to treat (NNT). RT complications were then considered, accounting for differences in toxicity incidences in the salvage versus adjuvant setting, to compute complication-adjusted NNTs. In all the trials, the signs and magnitudes of the NNTs obtained were used to compare adjuvant with salvage RT.

RESULTS

The absolute NNT analysis showed an advantage of adjuvant compared with salvage RT. After adjustment for RT complications, however, the advantage shifted to salvage RT. This transition point from superiority of adjuvant RT to superiority of salvage RT was sensitive to the estimated incidence and severity of RT side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant post-RRP RT was advantageous in comparison to salvage RT if the side effects of RT were estimated to be negligible. However, with moderate incidence/severity of RT side effects, salvage RT was advantageous. The findings herein must be tested in a prospective study in which both health-related quality of life and cancer control are documented in patients receiving adjuvant versus salvage post-RRP RT. Further work is needed to better estimate parameters entered into the model to determine the precise transition point between adjuvant and salvage RT with modern RT techniques.

Androgen ablation adjuvant to postprostatectomy radiotherapy: Complication-adjusted number needed to treat analysis

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the benefits and harm of androgen ablation (AA) adjuvant to radiotherapy in the postprostatectomy setting. AA is commonly used in the management of prostate cancer.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to estimate the absolute biochemical control advantage for the use of AA concomitant with postprostatectomy external beam radiotherapy. Additionally, a model was developed, with supporting published data, to estimate the utility-adjusted survival detriment due to the side effects of AA, using the number needed to treat (NNT) technique. Using these data, the unadjusted NNTs and the utility-adjusted NNTs for the addition of AA were computed. In all cases, the sign and magnitude of the NNTs obtained were used to gauge the effects of AA.

RESULTS

The unadjusted NNT analysis demonstrated very low values (far less than 20), suggesting a strong benefit for the use of AA, in both adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy settings. Even after adjustment for hormone-induced functional loss, a significant advantage of AA was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the complication-adjusted NNT method, AA appears to be advantageous in both adjuvant and salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy settings. The results of the present investigation demonstrated the significant role of the NNT technique for uro-oncologic management decisions when treatment complications need to be considered and balanced against the beneficial effects of the treatment.

Mastectomy and concomitant sentinel lymph node biopsy for invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has become a standard ancillary to breast conservation, there remains a hesitancy to perform SLNB concomitant with mastectomy primarily because of concerns regarding reoperation for a positive SLN.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 51 patients who underwent SLN biopsy concomitantly with mastectomy for invasive breast cancer was performed. In addition, a survey was sent to surgical oncologists who routinely perform SLNB in conjunction with mastectomy.

RESULTS

The SLN was identified in 98% of patients, and an average of 2.4 SLNs/patient were removed. The SLN was positive in 14 patients (27%). Ten patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection as a second procedure; an average of 15.4 +/- 6 nodes were cleared, and there were no complications. Although techniques vary greatly among surgeons, the majority believe that a subsequent ALND procedure does not carry additional risk of morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy and concomitant SLNB is a safe option for well-selected breast cancer patients. Results appear acceptable using a variety of techniques. Patients with a positive SLN can safely undergo completion axillary lymph node dissections. This includes patients who have undergone immediate reconstruction, but proper planning is needed to minimize potential risks.

Standard immunostains for melanoma in sentinel lymph node specimens: which ones are most useful?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in melanoma is an increasingly used procedure. Pathologic evaluation of SLNs using immunohistochemistry improves diagnostic accuracy, yet no universally accepted standard protocol for pathologic processing of SLNs exists.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with the sensitivity of the immunostains S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A for SLN biopsy.

METHODS

Ninety-nine positive SLNs from 72 patients were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of microscopic metastatic melanoma on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A stained sections and sensitivities of each immunohistochemical stain were determined.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A were 97%, 75%, and 96% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Given the lower sensitivity of HMB-45, our practice for evaluation of SLN biopsy specimens was modified using combinations of H&E, S-100, and Melan-A without HMB-45. If the H&E sections are negative or equivocal for metastatic melanoma, immunohistochemistry staining with S-100 protein and Melan-A is performed. New and improved protocols will undoubtedly be forthcoming as the field advances.

Hormone therapy adjuvant to external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hormone therapy commonly is used to treat metastatic, locally advanced, and localized prostate carcinoma. The objective of the current investigation was to determine, using the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) method, the effect of using hormone therapy to treat locally advanced disease, with consideration given to both the complications and the known advantages associated with hormone therapy.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to determine 1) the absolute benefit, based on available clinical endpoints, associated with the addition of hormone therapy to external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma; 2) the incidence of side effects of short-term and long-term hormone therapy; and 3) the stepwise progression from biochemical failure to death. A model was constructed to estimate the complication/utility-adjusted survival detriment resulting from the side effects of short-term (</= 6 months) and long-term (> 6 months) hormone therapy, and the absolute/unadjusted and complication-adjusted NNTs for the addition of short-term and long-term hormone therapy were computed. In all cases, the magnitudes and signs of the NNTs obtained were used to gauge the effect of hormone therapy.

RESULTS

The unadjusted NNTs were positive and in most cases had relatively small magnitudes (the greater the NNT, the smaller the benefit) for both short-term and long-term hormone therapy; these results were expected, and they suggested that there is a strong benefit associated with the use of hormones adjuvant to radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. Adjusted NNTs remained positive and had relatively small magnitudes even after the introduction into the analysis of complications of short-term and long-term hormone therapy. This finding, although weak with respect to the effect of short-term hormone therapy on cause-specific survival, remained robust over the range of values for utility impairment expected from short-term and long-term hormone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of short-term and long-term hormone therapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma appear to be significant and to outweigh the associated side effects. Long-term therapy appears to be better than short-term therapy in terms of virtually all endpoints studied, even when the increased incidence of side effects is considered. The current investigation was successful in the use of the complication-adjusted NNT method for oncologic and radiotherapeutic scenarios in which the results of randomized trials could be summarized, adjusted for treatment toxicity, and individualized to a given patient.