Cisplatin: process and future

Drug-induced Lung Disease in the Oncology Patient: From Cytotoxic Agents to Immunotherapy

Drug-induced lung disease is commonly encountered, especially in the oncology setting. Diagnosis is challenging because clinical and radiologic findings are nonspecific, often overlapping with other lung pathologies in these patients due to underlying neoplasia, infection, or other treatment effects such as radiotherapy. Furthermore, oncology patients often receive multiple antineoplastic agents concurrently, and virtually every agent has an association with lung injury. In this article, we will review a variety of antineoplastic agents that are associated with drug-induced injury and discuss incidence, their typical timing of onset, and imaging features.

Characteristics and outcomes of gemcitabine-associated pulmonary hypertension

Background

Despite its known cardiac and lung toxicities, the chemotherapy drug gemcitabine has only rarely been associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH), and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The objective of the present study was to assess the association between gemcitabine and PH.

Methods

We identified incident cases of precapillary PH confirmed by right heart catheterisation in patients treated with gemcitabine from the French PH Registry between January 2007 and December 2022. The aetiology, clinical, functional, radiological and haemodynamic characteristics of PH were reviewed at baseline and during follow-up. A pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis was conducted using the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database.

Results

We identified nine cases of pulmonary arterial hypertension, either induced (in eight patients) or exacerbated (in one patient) by gemcitabine. Patients exhibited severe precapillary PH, with a median mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 40 (range 26-47) mmHg, a cardiac index of 2.4 (1.6-3.9) L·min-1·m-2 and a pulmonary vascular resistance of 6.3 (3.1-12.6) Wood units. The median time from the initiation of gemcitabine to the onset of PH was 7 (4-50) months, with patients receiving a median of 16 (6-24) gemcitabine injections. Six patients showed clinical improvement upon discontinuation of gemcitabine. In the WHO pharmacovigilance database, we identified a significant signal with 109 cases reporting at least one adverse event related to PH with gemcitabine.

Conclusion

Both clinical cases and pharmacovigilance data substantiate a significant association between gemcitabine use and the onset or worsening of precapillary PH. The observed improvement following the discontinuation of treatment underscores the importance of PH screening in gemcitabine-exposed patients experiencing unexplained dyspnoea.

Severe and fatal interstitial lung disease induced by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case report

Gemcitabine is a cytotoxic drug commonly used in the treatment of several types of cancer. While gemcitabine is generally considered safe and effective, it can cause some side effects, including pulmonary toxicity. Interstitial lung disease is a rare but potentially serious event. We report a case of a 63-year-old patient with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. She received Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1, and day 8, and presented on day 15 of the first cycle with respiratory distress rapidly aggravating. Clinical and radiological findings were concordant with interstitial lung disease. Management consisted of high doses of corticosteroids and oxygen therapy. There was no clinical improvement and the patient passed away after a few days. Despite its low incidence, gemcitabine-induced interstitial lung disease may be responsible for a fatal clinical picture. Clinicians must be aware of this possibility and address respiratory symptoms as soon as possible.

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic cancer and interstitial lung disease: A nationwide longitudinal study

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an adverse event associated with gemcitabine administration. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, which is now a first-line chemotherapy regimen for pancreatic cancer (PC), may increase the risk of ILD; however, large-scale clinical data on this are limited. Thus, this study aimed to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of ILD in patients with PC receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Through the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a Japanese nationwide inpatient database with outpatient data, we identified consecutive patients with PC who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between July 2010 and March 2019 at 205 hospitals. Competing-risk analysis was used to examine the cumulative incidence and risk factors of ILD. Among the 6163 patients who received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, we documented 168 patients (2.7%) who developed ILD with cumulative incidence rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 2.0% (1.6%-2.4%), 2.7% (2.2%-3.1%), and 3.1% (2.6%-3.6%) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Compared with patients with PC who received gemcitabine monotherapy, those who received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel had an adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for ILD of 1.93 (95% CI: 1.51-2.47). Older age was associated with a high risk of ILD in patients receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (adjusted SHR comparing ≥75 to ≤74 years, 1.61; 95% CI: 1.16-2.24). In conclusion, this study demonstrated the clinical course of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel-associated ILD in patients with PC. When gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is administered to elderly patients with PC, symptoms associated with ILD must be monitored.

Gemcitabine-associated digital necrosis in metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog antimetabolite used in various malignancies, including metastatic breast cancer. Objective response rates in its use as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer are not to be underestimated. Cutaneous, hematological, pulmonary, and vascular side effects are well-known side effects. Venous thromboembolism may occur with antineoplastics, such as platinum compounds. Arterial thromboembolism is rare in cancer, almost rare with chemotherapy. Here, we present a metastatic breast cancer patient who had digital necrosis due to arterial occlusion with gemcitabine monotherapy.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old metastatic breast cancer female patient had digital ischemia and necrosis in the left hand's fifth finger after the second course of single-agent gemcitabine as the fourth line setting. Gemcitabine was discontinued, and medical treatment was started. Thrombus was detected in the left subclavian artery digital angiography. Balloon angioplasty and stenting were applied. However, digital amputation had to be performed since tissue necrosis had not regressed despite radiological interventions and medical treatment.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Gemcitabine was discontinued. Low molecular weight heparin and acetylsalicylic acid were started. The distal phalanx was amputated due to necrosis during follow-up. Gemcitabine was permanently stopped.

DISCUSSION

Gemcitabine-related vascular events, including arterial thrombosis, may also occur in cancer patients, especially those with higher tumor burden. Therefore, predisposing factors for hypercoagulability and vascular occlusion should be questioned in more detail even before starting antineoplastics which are known to have a lower risk for thrombosis, such as gemcitabine monotherapy.

Bleomycin-Induced Lung Toxicity in Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Risk Factors in the Positron Emission Tomography Era

Introduction

Bleomycin is a major antimitotic agent in the first-line treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma. The main limitation of its use is its pulmonary toxicity. The objectives of this study are to find out the risk factors for the occurrence of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and, on the other hand, to determine if positron emission tomography scan is a reliable means of early detection of this toxicity.

Methods

This is a retrospective study conducted in the clinical Hematology Department of Mohammed V Military Instruction Hospital, Rabat, Morocco. All patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and treated with a bleomycin-based chemotherapy were included. The impact of different clinical and biological factors on the risk of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity occurrence was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The benefit of positron emission tomography, usually performed as part of the re-assessment of Hodgkin’s lymphoma after two and four cycles, has been evaluated in the detection of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity.

Results

Among 124 patients included in the study, 18 (14.5%) patients experienced bleomycin-induced lung toxicity. On multivariate analysis, smoking (p = 0.038) and the use of the ABVD regimen (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) compared to the escalated BEACOPPe regimen (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) (p = 0.018) were statistically significant risk factors.

After two and four courses of therapy, the positron emission tomography was able to predict the occurrence of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity before the appearance of clinical symptoms only in 36.4 % and 12.5% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Studies to identify risk factors for the development of bleomycin-induced lung toxicity are crucial to reduce toxicity in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, two- and four-cycle positron emission tomography scans cannot be considered as a reliable means of early detection of this toxicity.

A Review of Treatment-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity in Breast Cancer

This article reviews the available literature that describes the incidence, diagnosis, mechanism, symptoms, and management of pulmonary toxicity induced by radiation therapy and current systemic medications used to treat breast cancer. An extensive literature search was conducted via Ovid Medline to identify all potentially relevant articles written in English from 2010 through January 2020. Additional relevant articles outside the time frame were included as needed. Although the risk of pulmonary toxicity from various breast cancer treatments is small in most instances, it can be fatal. Due to the high prevalence of breast cancer and the range of treatment options, healthcare providers should be aware of the risk of pulmonary toxicity from those treatments and how to prevent or manage complications.

Intravesically instilled gemcitabine-induced lung injury in a patient with invasive urothelial carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent with relatively low toxicities, as a valid option for elderly patients with underlying diseases. Gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicities are rare and various, ranging from self-limited episodes of bronchospasm to fatal, progressive, severe, interstitial pneumonitis and respiratory failure. Intravesical gemcitabine instillations are commonly used to reduce recurrence or progression for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer or urothelial cancer. Few severe toxicities have been reported for the intravesical instillation is assumed to be completely separated from the systemic circulation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old patient received 30 cycles of intravesical gemcitabine instillation after transurethral resection and developed a 1-wk fever, cough, hemoptysis, and dyspnea. After a thorough checkup, bilateral consolidation and infiltration of the lungs were documented and a percutaneous lung biopsy confirmed organizing pneumonia after treatment with broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics failed. Tapered corticosteroids were administered, and pulmonary toxicity gradually resolved.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicities present with various manifestations. In spite of the rare pulmonary involvement by the intravesical gemcitabine instillation, health care professionals who administer gemcitabine chemotherapy in this way should monitor for gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicities, particularly in patients with high-risk factors.

A Rare Case of Gemcitabine-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

Context

Gemcitabine is the backbone of systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In recent literature, gemcitabine has been linked to various pulmonary side effects.

Case Report

We report a case of an 82-year-old male who developed acute pulmonary hypertension after receiving one cycle of gemcitabine for metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. His symptoms began with fatigue associated with shortness of breath and cough that worsened despite dose reduction. He developed new onset bilateral pulmonary effusions and an echocardiogram revealed findings consistent with pulmonary hypertension. A computed tomography (CT) angiogram was negative for pulmonary thromboembolism. Although he was promptly treated with diuretics and steroids, the patient could not tolerate any further therapy.

Conclusion

Gemcitabine-induced pulmonary hypertension is rare and can be challenging to diagnose, as it remains a diagnosis of exclusion. However, physicians should be vigilant of new pulmonary symptoms, as delayed treatment can cause significant patient morbidity and mortality.

Grade 4 Pneumonitis in a Patient Treated with a Combination of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Recurrent Leiomyosarcoma of the Uterus

Gemcitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Although they are generally well-tolerated agents, they can also cause severe and life-threatening pulmonary toxicities. Here, we describe a case of grade 4 pneumonitis due to gemcitabine and docetaxel in a 74-year-old woman with recurrent, metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Despite early recognition of chemotherapy-induced lung injury and early administration of corticosteroid, she developed noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. She required multiple intubations and a tracheostomy. Physicians should not only be aware of gemcitabine and docetaxel’s potential to cause life-threatening pulmonary injuries but also recognize the variability in clinical presentations and treatment responses, the radiographic findings of these lung toxicities, and the need for early corticosteroid therapy in these cases.

The Spectrum of Pulmonary Toxicity in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Gemcitabine Combination Chemotherapy

Gemcitabine is widely utilized in the treatment of pancreatic, ovarian, and non small cell lung cancers. Gemcitabine is associated with a wide spectrum of lung toxicities, ranging from dyspnea 25% of patients to severe pulmonary toxicity in up to 5% of patients. There is a dearth of information specific to pulmonary toxicity in the setting of gemcitabine combination chemotherapy. Given the potential severity, it is important to identify it early by excluding more common etiologies. We share two case reports of patients with pancreatic cancer who developed severe pulmonary toxicity during gemcitabine combination chemotherapy. Both cases emphasize the heightened risk of pulmonary toxicity in patients receiving gemcitabine chemotherapy combinations, and a need to be vigilant to initiate appropriate therapies immediately.

Anticancer therapy and lung injury: molecular mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are two mainstream strategies applied in the treatment of cancer that is not operable. Patients with hematological or solid tumor malignancies substantially benefit from chemotherapeutic drugs and/or ionizing radiation delivered to the site of malignancy. However, considerable adverse effects, including lung inflammation and fibrosis, are associated with the use of these treatment modalities. Areas covered: As we move toward the era of precision health, we are compelled to understand the molecular basis of chemoradiation-induced pathological lung remodeling and to develop effective treatment strategies that mitigate the development of chronic lung disease (i.e. fibrosis) in cancer patients. The review discusses chemotherapeutic agents that are reported to induce or associate with acute and/or chronic lung injury. Expert commentary: There is a need to molecularly understand how chemotherapeutic drugs induce or associate with respiratory toxicities and whether such characteristics are inherently related to their antitumor effect or are collateral. Once such mechanisms have been identified and/or fully characterized, they may be able to guide disease-management decisions including effective intervention strategies for the adverse effects. In the meantime, radiation oncologists should be judicious on the dose of radiation delivered to the lungs, the volume of lung irradiated, and concurrent use of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Pulmonary toxicity in paediatric patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma receiving brentuximab vedotin

Brentuximab vedotin (Bv) is becoming increasingly important in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with improved outcomes and an overall favourable toxicity profile. However, Bv is associated with severe pulmonary toxicity when combined with bleomycin, suggesting that additive toxicity may be an important consideration. Furthermore, little has been published on tolerability in paediatric patients. We retrospectively evaluated the occurrence of pulmonary toxicity of Bv in 19 paediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory HL. Patient characteristics, baseline health status, treatment regimens including cumulative doses of Bv, bleomycin, gemcitabine, radiation and carmustine, and the occurrence of pulmonary toxicity were collected. Seven (36·8%) of the 19 patients were treated with Bv. The odds of pulmonary toxicity were 4·0-fold higher (95% confidence interval 0·55-29·18) in patients exposed to Bv compared to unexposed patients in univariate analysis (P = 0·17). Similar results were found in multivariable analysis. Pulmonary toxicity occurred frequently in our cohort and was more common in patients who received Bv than in patients who did not receive Bv, although this was not statistically significant. Because patients with HL are exposed to a myriad of therapies with potential for pulmonary toxicity, continuing to evaluate the risk associated with Bv is critical.

Lung function changes after chemoradiation therapy in patients with lung cancer treated by three usual platinum combinations

Background

Reports point out lung toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy in cancer patients. The aim of our study was to assess lung function after sequential chemoradiation therapy in patients with lung cancer.

Methods

Fifteen lung cancer patients participated the study and underwent lung function assessment before and after sequential treatment of chemotherapy with the 3 most applied platinum-based combinations: of vinorelbine (VN) 6 patients, gemcitabine (GEM) 4 patients and etoposide (EP) 5 patients and radiation therapy. Lung function tests were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), total lung capacity (TLC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (Kco).

Results

Mean patients' age was 58±9.4 years (42-75 years). Male patients were 14 (93.3%), all smokers. Overall, after chemoradiation treatment significant changes were noted in FEV1 (P=0.012), FVC (P=0.046), TLC (P=0.04) from baseline. The drop from baseline was more significant after chemoradiation therapy in DLCO (P=0.002) and KCO (P=0.008).

Conclusions

According to our results, sequential chemoradiation causes significant changes in lung function parameters in patients with lung cancer.

An Extremely Rapid Case of Pneumonitis with the Use of Nivolumab for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cancer death in the United States despite comprising a small percentage of the total number of cancer cases. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with distant metastatic disease is approximately 3%. New treatment options are an unmet need and remain an area of active investigation. A 53-year-old male with metastatic pancreatic cancer presented to the hospital with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure approximately 24 hours after receiving a novel therapeutic combination. Chest imaging showed marked changes as concerning for pneumonitis. Infectious workup was negative. The patient had initial clinical improvement after receiving initial intravenous steroids and oxygen support but eventually deteriorated later opting for supportive measures only. With infection ruled out, drug-induced pneumonitis was felt to be the likely cause of the radiologic and clinical changes. The rapidity of onset of symptoms is the aspect being highlighted in this case.

Overview of treatment related complications in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignant neoplasm of the pleura related to asbestos exposure. Despite recent advances in therapy for MPM, the prognosis remains poor, with considerable treatment associated morbidity. Radiological assessment plays a central role in the timely identification and subsequent management of treatment related complications in MPM. This review highlights common and uncommon complications associated with and encountered in the post treatment phase.

Pulmonary Toxicities from Conventional Chemotherapy

Despite significant recent progress in precision medicine and immunotherapy, conventional chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of the treatment of most cancers. Chemotherapy-induced lung toxicity represents a serious diagnostic challenge for health care providers and requires careful consideration because it is a diagnosis of exclusion with significant impact on therapeutic decisions. This review aims to provide clinicians with a valuable guide in assessing their patients with possible chemotherapy-induced lung toxicity.

Successful treatment of gemcitabine-induced acute interstitial pneumonia with imatinib mesylate: a case report

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine is currently the standard chemotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer. This chemotherapeutic agent is generally well-tolerated, myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity being common side effects. Nevertheless, gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicity has been rarely reported. Despite its low incidence, the spectrum of pulmonary injury is wide, including potentially fatal conditions. We report a case of acute interstitial pneumonia related to gemcitabine, completely solved with Imatinib Mesylate (IM).

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 69-year-old man, who developed a hypoxemic respiratory distress during adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine for stage IIA pancreatic cancer. The nonspecific diffuse alveolar involvement found on computed tomography (CT), together with the negative tests for infectious aetiology and the continuing severe respiratory failure despite a long course of broad-spectrum therapy, suggested gemcitabine-induced acute pneumonia as the most likely diagnosis. Thus, after the failure of steroids and all other conventional therapies, the patient was treated with imatinib mesylate on the basis of its activity in the management of graft-versus-host-induced lung fibrosis. A follow-up CT scan of chest one month later showed complete resolution of pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

Despite the low frequency of serious pulmonary toxicity, gemcitabine widespread use warns clinicians to consider this life-threatening toxicity. The favourable clinical outcome with IM treatment was remarkable, warranting additional study of IM in the treatment of lung fibrosis.

Exacerbation of gemcitabine-related pneumonia during radiotherapy for extrapulmonary lesion

Late-onset gemcitabine pulmonary toxicity is rare and association between pulmonary toxicity and radiotherapy to the extrapulmonary sites is controversial. Here, we report a case of acute exacerbated fatal interstitial pneumonia during radiotherapy to the extrapulmonary site. A 73-year-old woman with pelvic lymph node metastases from urothelial carcinoma underwent palliative radiotherapy after failure of gemcitabine-containing and gemcitabine-non-containing chemotherapy. Gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy had finished 13 months prior to the radiotherapy due to grade 3 pulmonary toxicity. During the course of radiotherapy to the pelvic lesion, she was complicated with fatal acute interstitial pneumonia even though the lung tissue was not irradiated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of fatal gemcitabine-related pulmonary toxicity during radiotherapy for extrapulmonary lesion. Although the association between late-onset pulmonary toxicity and radiotherapy is controversial, caution should be paid to a patient with a history of gemcitabine-related pulmonary toxicity who will undergo radiotherapy even though the lung volume is not irradiated.

Interstitial lung disease associated with gemcitabine: A Japanese retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a widely recognized adverse consequence of gemcitabine administration, but data on gemcitabine-associated ILD are limited. This study aimed to elucidate the incidence and risk factors for this adverse event.

METHODS

Patients who underwent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between July 2010 and March 2013 were retrospectively identified using a Japanese nationwide administrative database. ILD was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, codes: J70.2-70.4, J84.1 and J84.9. The cumulative incidence and risk factors for ILD were evaluated using a competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 25 924 patients who underwent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were identified from 331 hospitals (primary cancer; pancreatic, urothelial, biliary tract, lung, ovarian and breast, in 9070, 5578, 4803, 4388, 1339 and746 patients, respectively). ILD was observed in 428 patients (1.7%), and the cumulative incidence was estimated at 1.1% (95% CI: 1.0-1.2%), 1.5% (95% CI: 1.4-1.7%) and 1.9% (95% CI: 1.7-2.1%) at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the multivariable regression model, age >80 years and lung cancer were the strongest predictors for ILD (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), 2.61; 95% CI: 1.69-4.02 and SHR, 2.81; 95% CI: 2.16-3.65, respectively). Other significant risk factors included heavy smoking, prior chemotherapy and advanced cancer stage.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully demonstrated the clinical course of gemcitabine-associated ILD. Clinical oncologists should stratify individual patients for risk of ILD based on identified risk factors and fully consider the indication for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: A Case Report of Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease

INTRODUCTION

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent frequently used by for the treatment of several malignancies both in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Although myelosuppression is the most adverse event of this therapy, gemcitabine might induce severe pulmonary toxicities. We describe a case of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) related to gemcitabine.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was an 83-year-old man with a metastatic pancreatic cancer who was treated by gemcitabine as first-line therapy. He was in good health and received no other chemotherapy. A dose of 1000 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine was administered over a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. After a period of 6 months, a complete response was observed. Nevertheless, the patient developed a severe dyspnea, with arterial hypoxemia and very low lung diffusion for carbon monoxide. A CT scan showed diffuse ground glass opacities with septal lines, bilateral pleural effusion, and lymph node enlargement. On echocardiography, there was a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension with elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure and normal left ventricular pressures. Right heart catheterization confirmed pulmonary hypertension and normal pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Diagnosis of PVOD was made, and a gemcitabine-induced toxicity was suspected. A symptomatic treatment was started. At last follow-up, patient was in functional class I with near-normal of CT scan, arterial blood gases, and echocardiography. A gemcitabine-induced PVOD is the more likely diagnosis.

Phase I pilot study of Wilms tumor gene 1 peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination combined with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of and immune response to Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination combined with gemcitabine (DCGEM) as a first-line therapy among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Ten HLA-A*2402 patients were treated with WT1 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination (1 × 10(7) cells) on days 8 and 22 and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) ) on days 1, 8 and 15. Induction of a WT1-specific immune response was evaluated using the delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test, interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot and HLA tetramer assays, along with assays for various immunological factors. DCGEM was well-tolerated, and the relative dose intensity of gemcitabine was 87%. Disease control associated with a low neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio was observed in all three patients with DTH positivity; it was also correlated with a low percentage of granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells in the pretreatment peripheral blood (P = 0.017). Patients with liver metastases and high levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-8 (IL-8) showed poor survival even though a WT1-specific immune response was induced in them. WT1 peptide-pulsed DCGEM is feasible and effective for inducing anti-tumor T-cell responses. Our results support future investigations for pancreatic cancer patients with non-liver metastases and favorable immunological conditions. This trial was registered with the University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ number: UMIN-000004855).

Adverse reactions to oncologic drugs: spontaneous reporting and signal detection

Oncology is one of the areas of medicine with the most active research being conducted on new drugs. New pharmacological entities frequently enter the clinical arena, and therefore, the safety profile of anticancer products deserves continuous monitoring. However, only very severe and (unusual) suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are usually reported, since cancer patients develop ADRs very frequently and some practical selectivity must be used. Notably, a recent study was able to identify 76 serious ADRs reported in updated drug labels of oncologic drugs and 50% of them (n = 38) were potentially fatal. Of these, 49 and 58%, respectively, were not described in initial drug labels. The aims of this article are to provide an overview about spontaneous reporting of ADRs of oncologic drugs and to discuss the available methods to analyze the safety of anticancer drugs using databases of spontaneous ADR reporting.

Safety and efficacy of gemcitabine or pemetrexed in combination with a platinum in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and prior interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE

The incidence of lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is higher than in the general population; however, the clinical benefit of chemotherapy and the appropriate regimen for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ILD remain unclear. This study was conducted to elucidate the safety and efficacy of palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine or pemetrexed, both in combination with a platinum agent in NSCLC patients with ILD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and ILD who received gemcitabine or pemetrexed in combination with a platinum agent as first-line chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes, including response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), in addition to the acute exacerbation of ILD after chemotherapy were investigated.

RESULTS

Between January 2007 and December 2011, 52 patients were analyzed. The median age at chemotherapy was 67. Thirty-two patients (61.5 %) had adenocarcinoma histology. With respect to the types of ILD, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and non-IIP were observed in 42 (80.8 %) and 10 (19.2 %) patients, respectively. The FEV1 level was less than 80 % of the predicted value in 15 of the 41 patients in whom it was measured. The overall response rate was 42.3 % (95 % CI 28.8-55.9), and the median PFS was 5.4 months (95 % CI 4.6-6.2). The median OS was 7.9 months (95 % CI 5.5-10.3), and the 1-year survival rate was 31.7 % (95 % CI 19.0-44.4). Eight patients (15.4 %) died within 3 months of first-line chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a heavy smoking history (40 or more pack-year smoking history) was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. An acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD) caused by first-line chemotherapy was noted in 5.8 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that gemcitabine or pemetrexed in combination with platinum agents could be a feasible option for advanced NSCLC with ILD with some risk of AE-ILD or early death. To establish the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC and ILD, further well-controlled prospective studies are needed.

Results from the first decade of research conducted by the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project

INTRODUCTION

In 1998, a multidisciplinary team of investigators initiated the Research on Adverse Drug events And Reports (RADAR) project, a post-marketing surveillance effort that systematically investigates and disseminates information describing serious and previously unrecognized serious adverse drug and device reactions (sADRs).

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we describe the findings, dissemination efforts, and lessons learned from the first decade of the RADAR project.

METHODS

After identifying serious and unexpected clinical events suitable for further investigation, RADAR collaborators derived case information from physician queries, published and unpublished clinical trials, case reports, US FDA databases and manufacturer sales figures.

STUDY SELECTION

All major RADAR publications from 1998 to the present are included in this analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

For each RADAR publication, data were abstracted on data source, correlative basic science findings, dissemination and resultant safety information.

RESULTS

RADAR investigators reported 43 serious ADRs. Data sources included case reports (17 sADRs), registries (5 sADRs), referral centers (8 sADRs) and clinical trial reports (13 sADRs). Correlative basic science findings were reported for ten sADRs. Thirty-seven sADRS were described as published case reports (5 sADRs) or published case-series (32 sADRs). Related safety information was disseminated as warnings or boxed warnings in the package insert (17 sADRs) and/or 'Dear Healthcare Professional' letters (14 sADRs).

CONCLUSION

An independent National Institutes of Health-funded post-marketing surveillance programme can supplement existing regulatory and pharmaceutical manufacturer-supported drug safety initiatives.

A phase 1b study of trametinib, an oral Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumours

PURPOSE

This phase 1b study determined the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and schedule of trametinib in combination with gemcitabine. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical activity and steady-state pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Adults with advanced solid tumours, adequate organ function and Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ⩽ 1 were eligible. Once-daily oral trametinib (1mg, 2mg, 2.5mg) was escalated in a 3+3 design with standard gemcitabine dosing (1000 mg/m(2) IV Days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles). During expansion, trametinib 2mg was combined with gemcitabine. Pharmacokinetics samples were collected on Day 15 pre-dose and 1, 2, 4 and 6h post-dose; tumour assessments were repeated every two cycles.

RESULTS

Between 8/2009 and 11/2010, 31 patients (pancreas = 11, breast = 6, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) = 4, other = 10) were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in each cohort, and included febrile neutropenia, transaminase elevation and uveitis. The RP2D was declared as trametinib 2mg daily with standard gemcitabine dosing. Common grade 3/4 toxicities at the RP2D included: neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (19%) and transaminase elevation (14%). Of 10 patients with measurable pancreatic cancer, three partial responses (30%) were documented; two additional patients achieved objective responses (breast, complete response (CR); salivary glands, partial response (PR)). Pharmacokinetics suggested no change in exposures of either drug in combination.

CONCLUSION

Administration of trametinib at its full monotherapy dose of 2mg daily in combination with standard gemcitabine dosing (1000 mg/m(2) IV Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) was feasible. Though most toxicities were manageable, the addition of trametinib may increase gemcitabine-associated myelosuppression. Future studies of this combination will require monitoring to maintain dose and schedule.

Combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinomas in patients with high renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

This was a retrospective study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combined chemotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCa) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinomas (UCs) with special regard to patients with highly impaired renal function.

METHODS

Eleven patients whose creatinine clearance was 30 ml/min or under and who had been diagnosed with metastatic UC were treated with GCa. The patient cohort comprised 4 males and 7 females, with a median age of 74 (range 67-84) years. The median follow-up was 19 (range 1-58) months.

RESULTS

Five of the 11 patients (45%) showed an objective response, with 2 achieving a clinically complete response and 3 a partial response with GCa. The grade 3/4 toxicity of the regimen was primarily hematological, including anemia (55%), neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (45%). Four patients (36%) could not complete the treatment in total. Grade 3 pneumonitis was found in one patient, and the treatment was terminated. Grade 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in the patient on hemodialysis, and the patient was forced to discontinue the chemotherapy. Another 2 patients also called off the treatment due to a pulmonary adverse event and an elevation of serum creatinine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GCa appears to be effective for the treatment of metastatic UCs in patients with impaired renal function, but it is necessary to pay attention to the occurrence of severe adverse events.

Pulmonary outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to summarize the literature that documents the long-term impact of cancer treatment modalities on pulmonary function among survivors of cancer and to identify potential areas for further research.

METHODS

Systematic reviews of clinical trials, observational studies, case series, and review articles were conducted. Articles were limited to the studies that discussed pulmonary toxicity or late effects among pediatric cancer survivors and to follow-up investigations that were conducted a minimum of 2 years after completion of cancer-related treatment or 1 year after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

RESULTS

Sixty publications (51 clinical studies/reports and nine reviews) published from January 1970 to June 2010 in PubMed met the inclusion criteria. Data showed an association between radiotherapy, alkylating agents, bleomycin, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and thoracic surgery and pulmonary toxicity, as well as possible interactions among these modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary toxicity is a common long-term complication of exposure to certain anticancer therapies in childhood and can vary from subclinical to life threatening. Pulmonary function and associated loss of optimal exercise capacity may have adverse effects on long-term quality of life in survivors. Lung function diminishes as a function of normal aging, and the effects of early lung injury from cancer therapy may compound these changes. The information presented in this review is designed to provide a stimulus to promote both observational and interventional research that expands our knowledge and aids in the design of interventions to prevent or ameliorate pulmonary late effects among survivors of childhood cancer.

Interstitial lung disease associated with gemcitabine treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Although there are several reports concerning gemcitabine-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD), the risk factors for ILD are not well known. In addition, data comparing the incidence and pattern of ILD associated with gemcitabine treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) versus those with pancreatic cancer are scarce.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical records of 118 patients treated with gemcitabine between November 2004 and November 2010. The radiographic findings and other relevant clinical data were reviewed to identify patients who had developed ILD associated with gemcitabine treatment.

RESULTS

Out of these 118 patients, we identified 62 patients with NSCLC (group A) and 56 patients with pancreatic cancer (group B), which were then analysed. After gemcitabine administration, ILD was detected in 9 out of the total 118 patients (7.6%). Three patients had grade 2 ILD and 6 patients had grade 3 ILD. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior thoracic radiotherapy (odds ratio: 26.3) and pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis (PF) (odds ratio: 6.5) were correlated with ILD occurrence, but the incidence of ILD was not different between groups A and B. The median dose of gemcitabine administered till the manifestation of ILD tended to be lower in group A than in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior thoracic radiotherapy and pre-existing PF were correlated with higher ILD rate in gemcitabine-treated patients. ILD incidence did not differ between NSCLC and pancreatic cancer patients, which may be due to the differences in treatment strategy and tumour properties.

A case of late-onset gemcitabine lung toxicity

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent used for the treatment of a number of malignancies. Although its major dose-limiting side effect is myelosuppression, many pulmonary toxicities have been described with its use. Severe pulmonary toxicity is rare, but symptoms tend to be rapid in onset and potentially deadly. The average time from initiation of chemotherapy to onset of symptoms is less than two months. The most effective therapy is steroid administration, the efficacy of which has been variable. In this report, we describe a unique case of gemcitabine pulmonary toxicity in a patient who did not experience symptoms of pulmonary dysfunction until after 1 year of treatment. Her symptoms did not improve rapidly with steroids, nor did she rapidly decompensate as has been frequently described. To our knowledge, this is one of the first reported descriptions of late-onset gemcitabine lung toxicity.

Pleuropulmonary Changes Induced by Drugs in Patients with Hematologic Diseases

Patients with hematologic diseases who are being treated with therapy drugs, or receive radiation therapy or blood transfusions may develop a host of potentially fatal infectious and noninfectious pulmonary complications [1]. The increased complexity of multimodality and high-dose treatment regimens with the intended benefit of augmented antineoplastic efficacy and prolonged disease-free survival, the use of a panel of novel drugs to treat malignant and nonmalignant hematologic conditions (e.g., azacytidine, bortezomib, cladribine, dasatinib, fludarabine, imatinib, lenalidomide, rituximab, and thalidomide), total body irradiation (TBI) and hematopietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have increased the incidence of severe sometimes life-threatening pulmonary complications.

Gem-(R)CHOP versus (R)CHOP: a randomized phase II study of gemcitabine combined with (R)CHOP in untreated aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--EORTC lymphoma group protocol 20021 (EudraCT number 2004-004635-54)

BACKGROUND

  Despite recent improvements, many patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) ultimately succumb to their disease. Therefore, improvements in front-line chemotherapy of aggressive NHL are needed. Gemcitabine is active in lymphoma.

METHODS

We performed a randomized phase II trial of the addition of gemcitabine to standard CHOP chemotherapy with or without rituximab [(R)CHOP]. The trial was also designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in this combination. Patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL were randomized to receive either eight cycles of (R)CHOP given every 3 wk or (R)CHOP combined with gemcitabine [Gem-(R)CHOP].

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the trial before early closure. Twelve were randomized to Gem-(R)CHOP and 13 to (R)CHOP. MTD of gemcitabine was 800 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 8; dose-limiting toxicity was hematologic. Five patients (42%) treated with Gem-(R)CHOP achieved complete response in comparison with 10 (77%) treated with (R)CHOP. Median time to treatment failure was 1.5 yr for Gem-(R)CHOP and 3.1 yr for (R)CHOP. Three patients receiving Gem-(R)CHOP had serious pulmonary toxicity, when compared to none receiving (R)CHOP. One patient died of pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients, addition of gemcitabine did not seem to improve outcomes. Gem-(R)CHOP in previously untreated patients with aggressive NHL occasionally results in severe, potentially fatal, pulmonary toxicity.

A phase II study of combination chemotherapy in early relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer using gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer patients relapsing with a short treatment-free interval (TFI) after prior chemotherapy is unsatisfactory. This phase II trial evaluated the activity and feasibility of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus gemcitabine in this setting.

METHODS

Patients who had received prior platinum and paclitaxel with a TFI 0-12 months received PLD 25 mg/m(2)day 1 plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2)day 1, 8 every 21 days. Gemcitabine was dose escalated to 1000 mg/m(2)day 1, 8 from course 2 in the absence of grade 3/4 toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified according to response to primary chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (n=26 with CR on prior chemotherapy and TFI 6-12 months; n=20 with CR and TFI 0-6 months; n=33 with PR/SD and TFI 0-12 months) were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range 31-77 years), and 33 patients had received ≥ 2 prior treatments. A median of five courses was delivered per patient (total 389 courses). Gemcitabine was dose escalated in 124 courses and reduced in 105 courses. No PLD dose reductions occurred. Grade 3/4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia (n=4), PPE (n=2), and mucositis (n=2). One toxic death occurred (pneumonitis/alveolitis). Responses were complete in 5.1%, partial in 27.9%, and stable disease in 55.7%. Median OS and PFS were 12.5 and 6.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLD-gemcitabine combination is an effective and well-tolerated salvage treatment for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and is a valid candidate for evaluation in a phase III trial.

Locally advanced breast cancer: pulmonary toxicity secondary to gemcitabine

Gemcitabine is indicated for the treatment of nonmicrocytic lung, breast, pancreatic, bladder and ovarian cancer. Mild dyspnea has been reported but the incidence of severe lung damage is low. We report the case of a 58-year-old woman diagnosed with locally advanced infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast who received gemcitabine as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and suffered from severe pulmonary toxicity. We reviewed the cases published in the literature and conclude that although Gemcitabine is generally well tolerated, pulmonary toxicity requires high level of suspicion and prompt treatment to prevent an unfavourable outcome.

Fatal gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicity in metastatic gallbladder adenocarcinoma

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent that may cause unpredictable side effects. In this report, we describe a fatal gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicity in a patient with gallbladder metastatic adenocarcinoma. A 72-year-old patient was submitted to an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and a tubular adenocarcinoma in the gallbladder was incidentally diagnosed. CT scan and ultrasound before the surgery did not show any tumor. After the surgery a Pet scan was positive for a hot-spot in the left colon. The colonic lesion was conveniently removed and the histology evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma tubular. The patient was then submitted to three sections of 1,600 mg/m² of gemcitabine with intervals of 1 week. Three weeks later he developed severe respiratory distress. A helicoidal CT scan showed diffuse and severe interstitial pneumonitis, and lung biopsy confirmed accelerated usual interstitial pneumonia consistent with drug-induced toxicity. The patient presented unfavorable evolution with progressive worsening of respiratory function, hypotension, and renal failure. He died 1 month later in spite of methylprednisolone pulse therapy, large spectrum antimicrobial therapy, and full support of respiratory, hemodynamic and renal systems. Gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicity is usually a dramatic condition. Physicians should suspect pulmonary toxicity in patients with respiratory distress after gemcitabine chemotherapy, mainly in elderly patients.

Quality of reporting of serious adverse drug events to an institutional review board: a case study with the novel cancer agent, imatinib mesylate

PURPOSE

Serious adverse drug event (sADE) reporting to Institutional Review Boards (IRB) is essential to ensure pharmaceutical safety. However, the quality of these reports has not been studied. Safety reports are especially important for cancer drugs that receive accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval, like imatinib, as preapproval experience with these drugs is limited. We evaluated the quality, accuracy, and completeness of sADE reports submitted to an IRB.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

sADE reports submitted to an IRB from 14 clinical trials with imatinib were reviewed. Structured case report forms, containing detailed clinical data fields and a validated causality assessment instrument, were developed. Two forms were generated for each ADE, the first populated with data abstracted from the IRB reports, and the second populated with data from the corresponding clinical record. Completeness and causality assessments were evaluated for each of the two sources, and then compared. Accuracy (concordance between sources) was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 115 sADEs reported for 177 cancer patients to the IRB, overall completeness of adverse event descriptions was 2.4-fold greater for structured case report forms populated with information from the clinical record versus the corresponding forms from IRB reports (95.0% versus 40.3%, P < 0.05). Information supporting causality assessments was recorded 3.5-fold more often in primary data sources versus IRB adverse event descriptions (93% versus 26%, P < 0.05). Some key clinical information was discrepant between the two sources.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of structured syndrome-specific case report forms could enhance the quality of reporting to IRBs, thereby improving the safety of pharmaceuticals administered to cancer patients.

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study

OBJECTIVE

Doxorubicin-based treatment is standard therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. There is no standard second-line therapy. We determined activity of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line treatment for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma.

METHODS

Eligible women with unresectable uterine leiomyosarcoma progressing after prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) days one and eight over 90 min, plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 8 of a 21-day cycle with granulocyte growth factor. Patients with prior pelvic radiation received lower doses. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response was assessed by computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Forty-eight of 51 women were evaluable for response (one wrong histology, two never treated). Prior therapy was doxorubicin-based in 90%, and ifosfamide-based in 6%. The overall objective response rate is 27%, with complete response in 6.3% (3/48), and partial response in 20.8% (10/48). An additional 50% (24/48) had stable disease (median duration 5.4 months). The median number of cycles per patient was 5.5 (range 1-22); 73% of patients remained progression-free at 12 weeks and 52% at 24 weeks. The predominant toxicity was uncomplicated myelosuppression: thrombocytopenia grade 3 (29%), grade 4 (10.4%); neutropenia grade 3 (12.5%), grade 4 (8.3%) anemia grade 3 (20.8%), grade 4 (4.2%). While pulmonary toxicity was reported, no patient had drug-related pneumonitis/hypoxia-type toxicity. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6+ months (range 0.7-27+ months). The median duration of objective response was 9+ months (range 3.9-24.5+ months).

CONCLUSION

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel is active second-line therapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel is active as second-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. We sought to determine the activity of this regimen as first-line treatment.

METHODS

Eligible women with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) over 90 min, on days one and eight, plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day eight, with granulocyte growth factor support on day nine of a 21-day cycle. Patients with prior pelvic radiation received lower doses. Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every other cycle by RECIST.

RESULTS

Forty-two women enrolled, with 39 evaluable for response. Objective responses were observed in 15 of 42 patients (35.8% overall; complete response 4.8%, partial response 31%, 90% confidence interval 23.5 to 49.6%), with an additional 11 (26.2%) having stable disease. Nineteen of 38 (50%) received six or more cycles of study treatment. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity: neutropenia grade 3 in 5%, grade 4 in 12%; anemia grade 3 in 24%; thrombocytopenia grade 3 in 9.5%, grade 4 in 5%. One patient had a grade 3 allergic reaction, 17% had grade 3 fatigue. One possibly-related grade 4 pulmonary toxicity was observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (range 0.4 to 37.2+ months). Among 15 women with objective response, median response duration was 6 months (range 2.1 to 33.4+ months). Median overall survival was 16+ months (range:.4-41.3 months).

CONCLUSION

Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel achieves high objective response rates as first-line therapy in metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Severe lung and skin toxicity during treatment with gemcitabine and erlotinib for metastatic pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine in combination with the oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib is a new treatment option for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The nonhematological side effects of this regimen mainly include diarrhea and skin rash. For each of these drugs, gemcitabine and erlotinib, lung toxicities have been described previously. In this report, we present the first case of a nonlung cancer patient experiencing not only acne-like skin toxicity, but subsequently also severe interstitial lung disease during therapy with gemcitabine and erlotinib. Both therapeutic agents were suspected as a possible cause of this adverse event. An interaction between gemcitabine and erlotinib might have also contributed to the pathogenesis of this pulmonary toxicity. Treatment with high-dose steroids was, however, very effective in our patient and a complete recovery appeared within a few days. Thus, pulmonary side effects should be regarded carefully in pancreatic cancer patients receiving palliative therapy with gemcitabine and erlotinib.