Diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia

Association of pre-treatment bone marrow morphology and achievement of BCR-ABL1 transcript milestones in CML

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the fusion gene BCR-ABL1 which encodes aberrantly functioning tyrosine kinase. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is a landmark of CML management and the main goal is to achieve major molecular response (MMR) which is defined as BCR-ABL1^IS ≤ 0.1 % at 12 months of therapy. The aim of this study is to analyze histologic features of bone marrow (BM) in CML patients at the time of diagnosis and compare it to the level of BCR-ABL1^IS transcript at 3 (BCR-ABL1^IS ≤10 % early molecular response; EMR) and 12 months (MMR) as well as to so called molecularly undetectable leukemia (MUL) to see weather bone marrow morphology can be of value in predicting achievement molecular response milestones. Thirty-two bone marrow biopsies of CML patients, prior TKI therapy, were re-evaluated and CD34 immunohistochemistry was performed to examine microvessel density (MVD) and microvessel area (MVA) and subsequently compared it to the level of BCR-ABL1^IS transcript. This study showed statistically significant association between BM hypercellularity and EMR (p = 0.048) and MUL (p = 0.034), peri-trabecular adipocyte distribution and EMR and MUL (p = 0.027 and p = 0.011, respectively), MMR and bone marrow fibrosis (p = 0.029), loose megakaryocyte clustering and EMR and MUL (p = 0.004 and p = 0.018, respectively), absence of naked nuclei and MUL (p = 0.033) but there was no statistically significant association with vascular parameters. These results suggest that some bone marrow morphologic features prior TKI therapy might be indicators of favorable molecular response.

Evaluation and characterisation of Chronic myeloid leukemia and various treatments in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal BCR-ABL1-positive myelo-proliferative disorder resulting from an acquired genetic mutation, characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. CML is associated with significantly high granulocyte numbers in the bone marrow and peripheral blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study conducted at the Hematology Unit of King Saud University Medical City aimed to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of CML and the various treatments in Saudi Arabia. We have evaluated the demographic, clinical, and hematological data of 56 consecutive patients who visited the hospital from Jan 2012 to Jan 2018.

RESULTS

The diagnosis and stage of CML were determined based on the World Health Organization criteria, following polymerase chain reaction analysis of bone marrow aspirates. Our study group had equal numbers of genders with a age mean of 43.3+18.1 years. The predominance of younger patients and equal incidence in males and females could be due to the racial and socioeconomic disparities among our patients compared to those in previous studies. While the most predominant symptom was fatigue and bone pain, the most common clinical sign was hepato-splenomegaly, followed by remarkable weight loss, and epistaxis.

CONCLUSION

A patient with an increased WBC count, abdominal pain, left side distension, and hepato-splenomegaly should clearly be evaluated for CML.

Treatment patterns and deep molecular response in chronic phase - chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with second-line nilotinib or dasatinib: a multi-country retrospective chart review study

Achievement of MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on international scale) is an important goal of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study describes treatment patterns by region and assesses time to achieve MR4.5 in patients with CML - chronic phase (CP) treated with second-line nilotinib or dasatinib in 10 countries. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess time to MR4.5 for nilotinib versus dasatinib. The model accounted for the competing-risk event of TKI resistance, included random effects for country clustering, and was adjusted for baseline covariates. The study included 280 patients treated with either nilotinib (N = 135 [48%]) or dasatinib (N = 145 [52%]) as second-line TKI with median treatment durations of 19.1 and 18.7 months, respectively. Nilotinib was observed to be better in achieving MR4.5 than dasatinib (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.37, 95% CI [1.11, 1.69]) suggesting second-line nilotinib may perform better in achieving MR4.5 than dasatinib.

Evaluation of resistance to HIV-1 infection ex vivo of PBMCs isolated from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Current antiretroviral treatment (ART) may control HIV-1 replication but it cannot cure the infection due to the formation of a reservoir of latently infected cells. CD4+ T cell activation during HIV-1 infection eliminates the antiviral function of the restriction factor SAMHD1, allowing proviral integration and the reservoir establishment. The role of tyrosine kinases during T-cell activation is essential for these processes. Therefore, the inhibition of tyrosine kinases could control HIV-1 infection and restrict the formation of the reservoir. A family of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is successfully used in clinic for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The safety and efficacy against HIV-1 infection of five TKIs was assayed in PBMCs isolated from CML patients on prolonged treatment with these drugs that were infected ex vivo with HIV-1. We determined that the most potent and safe TKI against HIV-1 infection was dasatinib, which preserved SAMHD1 antiviral function and avoid T-cell activation through TCR engagement and homeostatic cytokines. Imatinib and nilotinib showed lower potency and bosutinib was quite toxic in vitro. Ponatinib presented similar profile to dasatinib but as it has been associated with higher incidence of arterial ischemic events, dasatinib would be the better choice of TKI to be used as adjuvant of ART in order to avoid the establishment and replenishment of HIV-1 reservoir and move forward towards an HIV cure.

First-line treatment selection and early monitoring patterns in chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia in routine clinical practice: SIMPLICITY

Achieving successful outcomes in chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) requires careful monitoring of cytogenetic/molecular responses (CyR/MR). SIMPLICITY (NCT01244750) is an observational study exploring tyrosine kinase inhibitor use and management patterns in patients with CP-CML receiving first-line imatinib (n = 416), dasatinib (n = 418) or nilotinib (n = 408) in the US and 6 European countries in routine clinical practice. Twelve-month follow-up data of 1242 prospective patients (enrolled October 01 2010-September 02 2015) are reported. 81% of patients had baseline comorbidities. Treatment selection was based on perceived efficacy over patient comorbidity profile. There was a predominance of imatinib-treated patients enrolled earlier in the study, with subsequent shift toward dasatinib- and nilotinib-treated patients by 2013/2014. Monitoring for either CyR/MR improved over time and was documented for 36%, 82%, and 95% of patients by 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; 5% had no documentation of CyR/MR monitoring during the first year of therapy. Documentation of MR/CyR testing was higher in Europe than the US (P < .001) and at academic versus community practices (P = .001). Age <65 years, patients being followed at sites within Europe, those followed at academic centers and patients no longer on first-line therapy were more likely to be monitored by 12 months. SIMPLICITY demonstrates that the NCCN and ELN recommendations on response monitoring have not been consistently translated into routine clinical practice. In the absence of appropriate monitoring practices, clinical response to TKI therapy cannot be established, any needed changes to treatment strategy will thus not be implemented, and long-term patient outcomes are likely to be impacted.

Measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts on the International Scale in the United States: current status and best practices

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) results from the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) translocation and expression of its fusion oncoprotein BCR-ABL1. BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard therapy for Ph-positive CML. Achievement of deep molecular responses (typically defined as ≥4-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 RNA levels) is an emerging treatment goal becoming attainable for more patients due to the availability of second-generation TKIs. Deep molecular responses are associated with improved long-term outcomes and are required prior to attempting cessation of treatment in treatment-free remission clinical trials. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European LeukemiaNet recommend regular monitoring of BCR-ABL1 RNA levels using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR). However, BCR-ABL1 RQ-PCR is a complex laboratory-developed test; routine quantitative results from clinical diagnostic laboratories may differ from those used to establish the recommendations. Although an International Scale (IS) was developed for standardized reporting of BCR-ABL1 RNA levels, IS adoption has been slow in the United States, but is now used by the vast majority of laboratories. Here, we discuss the importance of molecular monitoring in CML, gaps between current and best molecular monitoring practices in the United States, and challenges and potential solutions for universal IS adoption in the United States.

Impact of ELN recommendations in the management of first-line treated chronic myeloid leukaemia patients: a French cross-sectional study

The availability of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has extended therapeutic options for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. Monitoring recommendations and clinical response goals have recently been updated. The objective of this study was to describe the profile of CML patients in chronic phase currently receiving first-line therapy, including treatment, monitoring and response kinetics. A multicentre, cross-sectional, epidemiological survey in unselected chronic phase CML patients in France attending consultations during a one-month period was performed. 438 of 697 (62·8%) reported patients were currently receiving first-line treatment and were analysed. Imatinib was the most frequently received treatment (72·4% of patients). Retrospective cytogenetic and molecular assessments at 3, 6, 12 or 18 months were available in 88·4% of patients. At the 12-month assessment, 32·2% were not in major molecular response (MMR). At last assessment, among 355 patients with duration of treatment ≥ 12 months, 91·5% had achieved MMR and 66·5% were in deep molecular response. This study, performed in everyday practice population of CML patients, suggests that monitoring of molecular responses in real-life practice is aligned with European LeukaemiaNet recommendations. The majority of patients still receiving first-line treatment are in optimal response, with a few being classified as in the warning area or responding to failure.

Conditional survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) significantly improve survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Conditional probability provides survival information in patients who have already survived for a specific period of time after treatment.

METHODS

Cumulative response and survival data from 6 consecutive frontline TKI clinical trials were analyzed. Conditional probability was calculated for failure-free survival (FFS), transformation-free survival (TFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) according to depth of response within 1 year of the initiation of TKIs, including complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and molecular response with a 4-log or 4.5-log reduction.

RESULTS

A total of 483 patients with a median follow-up of 99.4 months from the initiation of treatment with TKIs were analyzed. Conditional probabilities of FFS, TFS, EFS, and OS for 1 additional year for patients alive after 12 months of therapy ranged from 92.0% to 99.1%, 98.5% to 100%, 96.2% to 99.6%, and 96.8% to 99.7%, respectively. Conditional FFS for 1 additional year did not improve with a deeper response each year. Conditional probabilities of TFS, EFS, and OS for 1 additional year were maintained at >95% during the period.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of TKIs, patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who survived for a certain number of years maintained excellent clinical outcomes in each age group. Cancer 2016;122:238-248. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Assessment of treatment and monitoring patterns and subsequent outcomes among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib in a community setting

INTRODUCTION

Real-world treatment and monitoring patterns have not been well documented among imatinib-treated chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients. Thus, we evaluated these patterns and responses to imatinib in CP-CML patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study, based on the Georgia Cancer Specialists' electronic medical record (EMR) system, identified CP-CML patients initiating treatment with imatinib from 01/01/2002 to 11/01/2011 who were subsequently followed for ≥6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients met the study criteria. Imatinib dose modification occurred in 59 patients (33%). Rates of treatment interruption, discontinuation, and switching to another therapy were 16%, 24%, and 23%, respectively. Of 27 patients discontinuing imatinib for lack of efficacy, 9 (33%) had initial dose escalation; 26 patients (96%) eventually switched to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. By 3 months, 168 patients remained on imatinib, of whom 96 (57%) had undergone cytogenetic and/or molecular testing. The frequency of response monitoring fluctuated over time, with rates as high as 28% for cytogenetic and 69% for molecular testing. Cumulative response rates steadily increased; 18 month rates were 47% for complete cytogenetic response and 26% for major or complete molecular response. There were no cases of progression and/or death among 38 patients who were regularly monitored for molecular response within the first 12 months of imatinib. Ten of 98 patients (10%) not regularly monitored had progressed or died.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-third of patients initiating imatinib for CP-CML required dose modification, treatment interruption, or discontinuation. Opportunities for improved monitoring in this setting were identified. Limitations include those inherent to retrospective analyses based on EMR and the uncertain extrapolability of the results.

Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibition therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia: a clinical perspective and emerging treatment options

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to extended lifespans for many patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). However, 20% to 30% of patients fail to respond, respond suboptimally, or experience disease relapse after treatment with imatinib. A key factor is drug resistance. The molecular mechanisms implicated in this resistance include those that involve upregulation or mutation of BCR-ABL kinase and those that are BCR-ABL independent. The clinical consequences of these molecular mechanisms of resistance for disease pathogenesis remain open for debate. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences of TKI resistance and addresses the current and future treatment approaches for patients with TKI-resistant CML.

Population level survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia in Germany compared to the US in the early 21st century

INTRODUCTION

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has produced 5-year survival of 90 + % for chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) patients in clinical trials. However, population level survival has been lower, especially in older patients. Here, we examine survival of patients with CML in Germany and compare it to survival of patients in the United States (US).

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the US and 11 cancer registries in Germany. Patients 15-69 years old diagnosed with CML were included in the analysis. Period analysis for 2002-2006 was used to provide the most up-to-date possible estimates of five-year relative survival.

RESULTS

Five-year relative survival was 68.7% overall in Germany and 72.7% in the US. Survival was higher in the US for all age groups except for ages 15-39 years, but the difference was only statistically significant for ages 50-59 years (at 67.5% vs 77.7% in Germany and the US, respectively). Survival decreased with age, ranging from 83.1% and 81.9%, respectively, in Germany and the US for patients 15-39 years old to 54.2% and 54.5%, respectively, in patients 65-69 years old. Survival increased between 2002 and 2006 by 12.0% points in Germany and 17.1% points in the US.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year survival estimates were higher in the US than in Germany overall, but the difference was only significant for ages 50-59 years. Survival did not equal that seen in clinical trials for either country, but strong improvement in survival was seen between 2002 and 2006.

Considerations for early switch to nilotinib or dasatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with inadequate response to first-line imatinib

Clinical evidence in chronic myeloid leukemia demonstrates a significant link between optimal response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and favorable clinical outcome. For patients with suboptimal response to first-line TKI, clinical data show that a considerable proportion can be rescued by second-line TKI. Practice guidelines now recommend that clinicians consider a switch in TKI for patients with suboptimal response as early as 3 months after first-line TKI initiation, thus allowing clinicians to intervene in a timely manner and consider the potential benefit of a switch in TKI therapy.

Current practices in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

A previous survey of physician self-reported practice patterns in the management of CML was conducted in 2005. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European LeukemiaNet guidelines now include nilotinib and dasatinib in their treatment algorithms for CML. To assess these new guidelines, a cross-sectional survey of US hematologists and/or oncologists was conducted in December 2010 through an online survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey had 43 questions consisting of items updated from the 2005 survey to reflect changes in clinical practice, tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, and current guidelines.

RESULTS

Analysis of the responses from 507 board certified medical oncologists/hematologists suggests that the use of imatinib 400 mg as an initial treatment option had decreased from 62% in 2005 to 52% in the 2010 survey. Currently, nearly 40% of physicians would choose either nilotinib or dasatinib as first-line treatment. From the surveyed physicians, achievement of at least a major molecular response (MMR) is the predominant treatment goal in chronic phase CML.

CONCLUSION

This survey emphasizes the need for continued updates and education regarding optimal therapy, monitoring practices, and therapeutic end points in CML.

Monitoring after successful therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia

Monitoring response to therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia using an effective strategy is fundamental for achieving optimal patient outcomes. It will allow the initiation of timely therapeutic intervention for patients with a suboptimal response or kinase inhibitor therapy failure. Evidence is mounting that reaching molecular targets early in therapy is as important as the initial hematologic and cytogenetic response for the identification of patients who may have a poorer outcome. When the molecular target of a major molecular response is achieved at 18 months, patients reach a safe haven where loss of response is rare. However, this benefit is dependent on continuous drug adherence in most patients. As some patients reach their second decade of successful imatinib therapy, how long will frequent response monitoring be necessary? Assuming that very late relapse will be extremely rare for responding patients remaining on kinase inhibitor therapy, there are reasons for maintaining a regular molecular monitoring frequency, including monitoring adherence assessment and confirming sustained undetectable BCR-ABL1 for those considering a discontinuation trial and for late molecular recurrence in patients who maintain response after treatment discontinuation.

Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia: a personalized approach to optimizing treatment response

Personalized medicine is rapidly developing a purposeful niche in the field of oncology. Monitoring the activity of the oncogenic fusion gene BCR-ABL1 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a good example of individualizing CML treatment for patients using patient-specific genetic information. However, the frequency at which molecular monitoring for BCR-ABL1 transcripts occurs during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CML in clinical practice is much lower than that recommended by either the National Cancer Center Network or the European LeukemiaNet guidelines. Adherence, one of the most critical factors affecting response to TKIs, is often less than desirable and rarely communicated to physicians by patients or managed by care providers. Less than optimal molecular monitoring and low adherence to TKI treatment can lead to rising transcripts levels, that when not detected, have been shown to contribute to poor outcomes. This review reports the basis for and describes the design of a state-of-the-art program intended to improve communication with physicians through real-time messaging about sequential test results for BCR-ABL1 and patients' adherence to TKI therapy.

Suboptimal responses in chronic myeloid leukemia: implications and management strategies

The high response rates and increased survival associated with imatinib therapy prompted a paradigm shift in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. However, 25% to 30% of imatinib-treated patients develop drug resistance or intolerance, increasing the risk of disease progression and poor prognosis. In 2006, the European LeukemiaNet proposed criteria to identify patients with a suboptimal response to, or failure associated with, imatinib; these recommendations were updated in 2009. Suboptimal responders represent a unique treatment challenge. Although they may respond to continued imatinib therapy, their long-term outcomes may not be as favorable as those for optimally responding patients. Validation studies demonstrated that suboptimal responders are a heterogeneous group, and that the prognostic implications of suboptimal response vary by time point. There are few data derived from clinical trials to guide therapeutic decisions for these patients. Clinical trials are currently underway to assess the efficacy of newer tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this setting. Identification of suboptimal responders or patients failing treatment using hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques allows physicians to alter therapy earlier in the treatment course to improve long-term outcomes.

Suboptimal responses in chronic myeloid leukemia: milestones and mechanisms

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who fail to achieve timely treatment responses have a worse prognosis. Although many patients respond well to first-line treatment with imatinib, a significant proportion relapse or experience an inadequate response. Since effective alternative Bcr-Abl inhibitors are available (i.e., dasatinib or nilotinib), several regional groups have proposed milestones for imatinib failure or suboptimal response based on the achievement of specified levels of response within a defined treatment duration. A suboptimal response indicates that, although patients may continue to receive a benefit from continuing imatinib treatment at the assigned dose, long-term outcome may be better with an alternative strategy. The underlying mechanisms behind suboptimal responses are multifactorial and may differ from those causing relapse.

Current patient management of chronic myeloid leukemia in Latin America: a study by the Latin American Leukemia Net (LALNET)

BACKGROUND

Treatment recommendations have been developed for management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

METHODS

A 30-item multiple-choice questionnaire was administered to 435 hematologists and oncohematologists in 16 Latin American countries. Physicians self-reported their diagnostic, therapeutic, and disease management strategies.

RESULTS

Imatinib is available as initial therapy to 92% of physicians, and 42% of physicians have access to both second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Standard-dose imatinib is the preferred initial therapy for most patients, but 20% would manage a young patient initially with an allogeneic stem cell transplant from a sibling donor, and 10% would only offer hydroxyurea to an elderly patient. Seventy-two percent of responders perform routine cytogenetic analysis for monitoring patients on therapy, and 59% routinely use quantitative polymerase chain reaction. For patients who fail imatinib therapy, 61% would increase the dose of imatinib before considering change to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, except for patients aged 60 years, for whom a switch to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor was the preferred choice.

CONCLUSIONS

The answers to this survey provide insight into the management of patients with CML in Latin America. Some deviations from current recommendations were identified. Understanding the treatment patterns of patients with CML in broad population studies is important to identify needs and improve patient care.

BCR-ABL mutation testing to predict response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Although randomized evidence demonstrates that imatinib (a commercially available TKI) prolongs event–free survival in patients with CML, some patients develop imatinib intolerance or resistance. In addition, imatinib is less effective in patients who have progressed to more advanced disease stages, such as accelerated phase and blastic phase CML. For these reasons, 2nd generation TKIs that can inhibit the BCR-ABL protein more effectively or target additional disease mechanisms have been developed. Two such drugs have also been approved for clinical use by the FDA, nilotinib and dasatinib. Resistance to TKI treatment is thought to be mediated through various mechanisms, the most common of which is BCR-ABL1 mutations. Testing for mutations in BCR-ABL1 may predict lack of response to imatinib or may inform the choice between alternative TKIs.

The changing scene of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia--a report from the German Registry covering the period from 1998 to 2004

Due to the recent changes in the indication to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), we retrospectively analyzed 1,716 patients with different CML stages who received an allograft from related (n = 767) or unrelated donors (n = 938) within the German Registry of Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST) from 1998 to 2004. Myeloablative conditioning was performed in 724/871 cases (83%), dose-reduced conditioning in 147/871 (17%). Annual transplantations were decreasing from 357 to 98 (28%) in the period of study, but the proportion of advanced cases was increasing from 32% (112/346) to 53% (50/94) of all SCTs. Stage of disease, intervals from diagnosis, and patients' age were independent prognostic parameters, while peripheral stem cells and unrelated transplantation seemed equal to bone marrow/related transplantation. This study demonstrates that allo-SCT still has an important role in advanced CML, which emphasizes the need for optimized transplantation strategies for these high-risk patients.

Innovative approaches of targeted therapy for CML of childhood in combination with paediatric haematopoietic SCT

Allogeneic haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) induces CRs in most patients with CML. With the excellent short-term treatment results induced by imatinib (IMA), attitudes have changed and only a minority of children are now transplanted upfront. This review addresses the role of IMA in children with CML, focusing on the starting dose of IMA, possible adverse effects, timing of HSCT in children, duration of IMA treatment and monitoring of treatment efficacy to unravel failure of early treatment of IMA as well as treatment of CML relapse after HSCT. As the paediatric experience with IMA is still very limited, many answers and algorithms are adapted from CML in adults. Basically, HSCT should be postponed to achieve an optimal tumour cell reduction by IMA treatment. Children with a low-risk EBMT score should undergo HSCT within 2 years after diagnosis to avoid prolonged exposure and unknown late effects of IMA. Without a perfectly HLA-matched donor, HSCT may be postponed until CML becomes refractory to IMA. As realized in the presently activated international trial CML-paed II, this approach represents a risk-adapted therapy with the benefit of being tailored to the needs and profile of an individual patient.

Suboptimal response to or failure of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal strategy?

Treatment responses to imatinib vary among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and definitions of treatment failure and suboptimal response have been published. This article discusses monitoring and treatment of patients with CML after failure of or suboptimal response to imatinib therapy. We reviewed articles listed on PubMed from January 1, 2002, to July 31, 2008, and abstracts from the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Search terms used were chronic myeloid/myelogenous leukemia, imatinib, and BCR-ABL. To enable early recognition of suboptimal responses, patients should be frequently monitored according to published guidelines, including cytogenetic analysis every 6 months until a complete response is achieved and molecular monitoring every 3 months from the start of therapy or monthly if an increasing BCR-ABL1 transcript level is detected. Mutational analysis of BCR-ABL1 may assist with treatment selection. A recent survey suggests that a notable proportion of physicians do not follow treatment guidelines and that broader communication is required. Recent recommendations state that, in patients whose response to imatinib at 400 mg/d is suboptimal, the dose should be increased, whereas alternative therapies, such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and allogeneic stem cell transplant (in eligible patients), and imatinib dose escalation should be considered after imatinib failure. However, clinical data are lacking to confirm this sequence of treatments, and introducing alternative therapies at an earlier stage of treatment, for example, after a suboptimal response, may produce better long-term outcomes in a higher proportion of patients. Patient and disease characteristics should be carefully considered to optimize treatment strategy for CML.

Suboptimal response to or failure of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal strategy?

Treatment responses to imatinib vary among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and definitions of treatment failure and suboptimal response have been published. This article discusses monitoring and treatment of patients with CML after failure of or suboptimal response to imatinib therapy. We reviewed articles listed on PubMed from January 1, 2002, to July 31, 2008, and abstracts from the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. Search terms used were chronic myeloid/myelogenous leukemia, imatinib, and BCR-ABL. To enable early recognition of suboptimal responses, patients should be frequently monitored according to published guidelines, including cytogenetic analysis every 6 months until a complete response is achieved and molecular monitoring every 3 months from the start of therapy or monthly if an increasing BCR-ABL1 transcript level is detected. Mutational analysis of BCR-ABL1 may assist with treatment selection. A recent survey suggests that a notable proportion of physicians do not follow treatment guidelines and that broader communication is required. Recent recommendations state that, in patients whose response to imatinib at 400 mg/d is suboptimal, the dose should be increased, whereas alternative therapies, such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and allogeneic stem cell transplant (in eligible patients), and imatinib dose escalation should be considered after imatinib failure. However, clinical data are lacking to confirm this sequence of treatments, and introducing alternative therapies at an earlier stage of treatment, for example, after a suboptimal response, may produce better long-term outcomes in a higher proportion of patients. Patient and disease characteristics should be carefully considered to optimize treatment strategy for CML.

Molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia: response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and prognostic implications

The majority of patients with chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who are treated with Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib and dasatinib achieve cytogenetic disease remission (ie, Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells undetectable by cytogenetic evaluation). However, more sensitive methods are required for monitoring residual disease (ie, molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels). It is generally accepted that molecular responses have prognostic significance. Patients with CP CML who achieve early molecular responses are more likely to achieve durable cytogenetic responses and are less likely to experience disease progression. Rising BCR-ABL transcript levels also indicate loss of response, often as a consequence of developing BCR-ABL mutations. However, some studies have suggested that patients who achieve complete cytogenetic disease remission may not derive an additional prognostic benefit from achieving a major molecular response. Practical issues also exist for molecular monitoring with respect to restricted access and variability in methodologies and data reporting. Although molecular monitoring has a clear role in assessing residual disease and determining the risk of disease progression in patients with CML, the importance of cytogenetic monitoring should not be ignored.

Molecular diagnosis and monitoring in the clinical management of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

The well-established molecular pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and its consequences for laboratory testing and clinical management illustrate a classic paradigm for the importance of molecular diagnostics in targeted drug therapy. The success of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, as the currently recommended first-line treatment of early chronic phase CML has both fueled the need for timely and reproducible molecular testing of the BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript in diagnosis and monitoring as well as necessitated the detection of kinase domain mutations that confer resistance to this agent. As, ongoing research continues to refine guidelines for monitoring residual disease in patients undergoing TKI therapy, an understanding of molecular technologies and their interpretation is critical. This review summarizes the molecular strategies that are currently employed in the initial diagnosis and subsequent management of CML patients maintained on TKI therapy.