1
|
Nishio S, Ushijima K, Ishikawa M, Tokunaga H, Horie K, Yamaguchi S, Suzuki S, Yahata H, Tsuda H, Satoh T. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic factors of uterine serous carcinoma in Japanese women: a multi-center study. J Gynecol Oncol 2025; 36:36.e93. [PMID: 40150911 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 08/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multi-center retrospective study aimed to clarify the characteristics, diagnostic accuracy, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) in Japanese women. METHODS The medical records of 193 patients who were treated between 2006 and 2008 at 24 participating institutions in the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group were examined, and pathological slides of 188 patients were re-checked through central pathology review (CPR), hematoxylin-eosin staining, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS USC was confirmed in 144 of the 188 (76.6%) patients using CPR, and only 50% were correctly diagnosed preoperatively. Forty-three patients were diagnosed with non-serous carcinoma, whereas one patient had metastasis from another organ. The average age was 65.7 years, and 19% of patients had a history of other cancers. The incidence of stage III-IV disease was 52.8%, and lymph node metastasis was found in 28.5% of patients. Extrauterine spread and distant metastasis occurred in 39% and 14% of patients, respectively. The 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 56% and 42%, respectively. The PFS of patients with stage I and II who underwent complete staging surgery was 92.3%, and that of those without lymph node dissection or omentectomy was 33.3%. Patients with USC had a significantly worse prognosis than 43 patients with non-serous carcinoma. CONCLUSION USC in Japanese women has characteristics different from those of endometrioid carcinoma, worse prognosis, and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. Complete surgical staging is necessary even for early-stage disease. Additionally, new adjuvant treatment strategies, including molecular targeted therapy, should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Nishio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
| | - Kimio Ushijima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JCHO Kurume General Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Mitsuya Ishikawa
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Tokunaga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Koji Horie
- Department of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yamaguchi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | - Shiro Suzuki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideaki Yahata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Tsuda
- Department of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Toyomi Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toboni M, Kurnit K, Erickson B, Powell M, Secord AA, Fader AN. Updates and controversies in the management of uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2025; 35:101672. [PMID: 40056788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 01/26/2025] [Accepted: 01/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma are among the rarest but most lethal endometrial cancer sub-types, accounting for 15% of all cases, and are responsible for more than 50% of related deaths. These malignancies are distinguished by a high likelihood of metastasis and multisite recurrence, making them biologically different from other endometrial cancer sub-types. This review aims to analyze the existing evidence regarding molecular classification, new biomarkers, and innovative treatment approaches for these high-risk tumors. Herein, we explored the role of biomarkers, including HER2, TP53, and mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability hypermutated and their influence on treatment strategies, surveillance approaches, the potential role of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, novel precision-based treatment options, and disparate survival outcomes for non-Hispanic Black and other underserved minority patients, along with strategies to improve outcomes for these patients. Substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years, prompting the following question: What lies ahead in the next 5 years? Our current understanding of uterine serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma underscores the necessity of continuing to prioritize biomarker-driven therapies and the development of novel treatments through clinical trials while integrating these new strategies with traditional approaches, such as surgical resection and cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Toboni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Katherine Kurnit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Britt Erickson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN, USA
| | - Matthew Powell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anastasio MK, Nolin A, Penvose KN, Lambert K, Li J, Ledbetter L, Davidson BA, Havrilesky LJ, Albright BB. Adjuvant therapy and recurrence risk in non-myoinvasive high-grade (stage IC) endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 191:10-18. [PMID: 39305819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize practice patterns and outcomes among patients with non-myoinvasive high-grade (formerly stage IA, now stage IC) endometrial cancer. METHODS We conducted a systematic search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to May 8, 2024 to identify studies reporting on treatment and outcomes of non-myoinvasive high-grade endometrial cancer. We included full-text English reports of patients undergoing adjuvant therapy or surveillance for polyp- or endometrium-confined high-grade endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion containing data on recurrence or survival outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The primary outcome was recurrence risk. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to summarize binomial proportions and to compare outcomes by adjuvant treatment strategy. RESULTS A total of 29 studies were included, representing 2770 unique patients. Overall, 49.0 % of patients were managed with observation and 37.9 % with chemotherapy. Most patients (92.5 %) had serous histology. Of 23 studies with data on recurrence, 13.7 % of patients recurred, with a meta-analysis estimate recurrence risk of 11 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 8-15 %). Across 13 studies reporting on recurrence by receipt of chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, comparative meta-analysis showed similar likelihood of recurrence (8.0 % versus 13.2 %; odds ratio 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.38-1.42). Comparative meta-analyses for (1) adjuvant therapy versus observation and (2) observation or vaginal brachytherapy versus chemotherapy and/or external beam radiation therapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference in recurrence risk. Sensitivity analyses results, including those limiting to studies of patients with serous histology (12 studies) or complete surgical staging (10 studies), were overall consistent with the primary analysis. Survival data was inconsistently reported and not amenable to meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Among patients with non-myoinvasive high-grade endometrial cancer, recurrence risk was 11 % and use of adjuvant therapy was not associated with reduced recurrence risk. Prospective study of this population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Katherine Anastasio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Angela Nolin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Jessie Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Brittany A Davidson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura J Havrilesky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin B Albright
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Akingbade A, Fabi F, Cartes R, Tsui J, Alfieri J. Adjuvant Treatment of Stage I-II Serous Endometrial Cancer: A Single Institution 20-Year Experience. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3758-3770. [PMID: 39057149 PMCID: PMC11276548 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Serous endometrial carcinoma (SEC) is a high-risk subtype of endometrial cancer. The effectiveness of multiple adjuvant therapies, namely chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and sequential/concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CRT), have previously been investigated. However, optimal management of early-stage SEC remains unclarified. Methods: All cases of early-stage SEC (FIGO 2009 stages I-II) treated in our institution from 2002 to 2019 were identified. Patient data were documented until September 2023. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox's proportional hazard model; descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 50 patients underwent total hysterectomy-bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and omentectomy, displaying stage IA (60%), IB (24%), and II (16%) disease. The median follow-up was 90.9 months. Patients underwent adjuvant CRT (n = 36, 72%), CT (n = 6, 12%), or RT (n = 6, 12%). Two patients were observed and excluded from analyses. The 42 patients who received radiotherapy had pelvic external beam radiotherapy (n = 10), vaginal brachytherapy (n = 21), or both (n = 11). CRT had better OS (HR 0.14, 95%CI 0.04-0.52, p < 0.005) and DFS (HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.97, p = 0.05) than CT alone. RT displayed no OS or DFS benefits compared to CT/CRT. Recurrences were mostly distant. Acute and late G3-4 toxicities were primarily hematologic. Conclusions: Our data underline the challenge of treating SEC. CRT appears to be superior to CT alone but not to RT. Most recurrences were distant, highlighting the need for optimized systemic treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aquila Akingbade
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, Western University, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada;
| | - François Fabi
- Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Intégré de Cancérologie (CIC), Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada;
| | - Rodrigo Cartes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (R.C.); (J.T.)
| | - James Tsui
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (R.C.); (J.T.)
| | - Joanne Alfieri
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; (R.C.); (J.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matoba Y, Zarrella DT, Pooladanda V, Azimi Mohammadabadi M, Kim E, Kumar S, Xu M, Qin X, Ray LJ, Devins KM, Kumar R, Kononenko A, Eisenhauer E, Veillard IE, Yamagami W, Hill SJ, Sarosiek KA, Yeku OO, Spriggs DR, Rueda BR. Targeting Galectin 3 illuminates its contributions to the pathology of uterine serous carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1463-1476. [PMID: 38438589 PMCID: PMC11058234 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02621-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine serous cancer (USC) comprises around 10% of all uterine cancers. However, USC accounts for approximately 40% of uterine cancer deaths, which is attributed to tumor aggressiveness and limited effective treatment. Galectin 3 (Gal3) has been implicated in promoting aggressive features in some malignancies. However, Gal3's role in promoting USC pathology is lacking. METHODS We explored the relationship between LGALS3 levels and prognosis in USC patients using TCGA database, and examined the association between Gal3 levels in primary USC tumors and clinical-pathological features. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gal3-knockout (KO) and GB1107, inhibitor of Gal3, were employed to evaluate Gal3's impact on cell function. RESULTS TCGA analysis revealed a worse prognosis for USC patients with high LGALS3. Patients with no-to-low Gal3 expression in primary tumors exhibited reduced clinical-pathological tumor progression. Gal3-KO and GB1107 reduced cell proliferation, stemness, adhesion, migration, and or invasion properties of USC lines. Furthermore, Gal3-positive conditioned media (CM) stimulated vascular tubal formation and branching and transition of fibroblast to cancer-associated fibroblast compared to Gal3-negative CM. Xenograft models emphasized the significance of Gal3 loss with fewer and smaller tumors compared to controls. Moreover, GB1107 impeded the growth of USC patient-derived organoids. CONCLUSION These findings suggest inhibiting Gal3 may benefit USC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Matoba
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Dominique T Zarrella
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Venkatesh Pooladanda
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Maryam Azimi Mohammadabadi
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Eugene Kim
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Shaan Kumar
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Mengyao Xu
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Xingping Qin
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lauren J Ray
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Kyle M Devins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Raj Kumar
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Artem Kononenko
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Eric Eisenhauer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Division Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Irva E Veillard
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Wataru Yamagami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Sarah J Hill
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology and Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Oladapo O Yeku
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - David R Spriggs
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Bo R Rueda
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Division Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
You X, Dong Y, Wang J, Cheng Y, Jia Y, Zhang X, Wang J. The comparison of pure uterine serous carcinoma and mixed tumor with serous component: a single-institution review of 91 cases. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:99. [PMID: 38233757 PMCID: PMC10795214 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11793-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pure uterine serous carcinoma (p-USC) and mixed tumors with serous component (m-USC) are aggressive subtypes of endometrial cancer associated with high mortality rates. This retrospective study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and outcomes of p-USC and m-USC in a single center. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with USC at Peking University People's Hospital between 2008 and 2022. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare clinicopathological characteristics between p-USC and m-USC. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the impact of clinical and pathological variables on OS and PFS. RESULTS Among the 91 patients who underwent surgery, 65.9% (n = 60) were p-USC, and 34.1% (n = 31) were m-USC. Patients with p-USC had earlier menopause (P = 0.0217), a lower rate of progesterone receptor(PR) expression (P < 0.001), and were more likely to have positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.0464). After a median follow-up time of 40 months, 28 (46.7%) p-USC and 9 (29%) m-USC patients had progression disease, 18 (30%) and 8 (25.8%) patients died of their disease. 5-year PFSR were 51.2% and 75.3%, respectively, and 5-year OS rates were 66% and 67.4%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that p-USC was more likely to relapse than m-USC (P = 0.034), but there was no significant difference in OS. Cox regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and surgical approach were risk factors for OS, and myoinvasion depth ≥ 1/2 was an independent risk factor for PFS. CONCLUSIONS p-USC was more likely to relapse than m-USC, but there was no significant difference in OS between the two subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuewu You
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China
| | - Yangyang Dong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China
| | - Jiaqi Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China
| | - Yuan Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China
| | - Yuanyuan Jia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China
| | - Xiaobo Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China
| | - Jianliu Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lefebvre M, Duchatelet M, El Hajj H, De Courrèges A, Wallet J, Bellier C, Le Tinier F, Le Deley MC, Martinez Gomez C, Leblanc E, Narducci F, Hudry D. Stage I Clear Cell and Serous Uterine Carcinoma: What Is the Right Adjuvant Therapy? Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1174-1185. [PMID: 36661739 PMCID: PMC9858549 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This single-center study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with FIGO stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma according to the type of adjuvant treatment received. The data were collected between 2003 and 2020 and only patients with stage I clear cell or serous uterine carcinoma treated with primary surgery were included. These were classified into three groups: No treatment or brachytherapy only (G1), radiotherapy +/- brachytherapy (G2), chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy +/- brachytherapy (G3). In total, we included 52 patients: 18 patients in G1, 16 in G2, and 18 in G3. Patients in the G3 group presented with poorer prognostic factors: 83.3% had serous histology, 27.8% LVSI, and 27.8% were FIGO stage IB. Patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy showed an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02) and a trend towards an enhanced 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.056). In contrast, OS (p = 0.97) and PFS (p = 0.84) in the chemotherapy group with poorer prognostic factors, were similar with increased toxicity (83.3%). Radiotherapy is associated with improved 5-year OS and tends to improve 5-year PFS in women with stage I clear cell and serous uterine carcinoma. Additional chemotherapy should be cautiously considered in serous carcinoma cases presenting poor histological prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Lefebvre
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
| | - Mathilde Duchatelet
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
| | - Houssein El Hajj
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
| | - Antoine De Courrèges
- Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (A.D.C.); (J.W.); (M.C.L.D.)
| | - Jennifer Wallet
- Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (A.D.C.); (J.W.); (M.C.L.D.)
| | - Charlotte Bellier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Florence Le Tinier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France;
| | - Marie Cécile Le Deley
- Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Oscar Lambret Comprehensive Cancer Center, 59020 Lille, France; (A.D.C.); (J.W.); (M.C.L.D.)
| | - Carlos Martinez Gomez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1192—Protéomique Réponse Inflammatoire Spectrométrie de Masse—PRISM, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Eric Leblanc
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1192—Protéomique Réponse Inflammatoire Spectrométrie de Masse—PRISM, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Fabrice Narducci
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1192—Protéomique Réponse Inflammatoire Spectrométrie de Masse—PRISM, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Delphine Hudry
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France; (M.D.); (H.E.H.); (C.M.G.); (E.L.); (F.N.); (D.H.)
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1192—Protéomique Réponse Inflammatoire Spectrométrie de Masse—PRISM, 59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kurnit KC, Nobre SP, Fellman BM, Iglesias DA, Lindemann K, Jhingran A, Eriksson AGZ, Ataseven B, Glaser GE, Mueller JJ, Westin SN, Soliman PT. Adjuvant therapy in women with early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:452-457. [PMID: 36243601 PMCID: PMC10278585 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine serous carcinoma is a rare but aggressive subtype of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Our objective was to compare adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. METHODS This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. Patients with FIGO Stage IA-II disease after surgery, whose tumors had serous or any mixed serous/non-serous histology were included. Patients with carcinosarcoma were excluded. Clinical data were abstracted from local medical records. Summary statistics, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS There were 737 patients included. Most patients had Stage IA disease (75%), 49% of which had no myometrial invasion. Only 164 (24%) tumors had lymphatic/vascular space invasion. Adjuvant treatment varied: 22% received no adjuvant therapy, 17% had chemotherapy alone, 19% had cuff brachytherapy, 35% had cuff brachytherapy with chemotherapy, and 6% underwent pelvic radiation. Adjuvant treatment was significantly associated with a decreased risk of recurrence (p = 0.04). Compared with no adjuvant therapy, patients who received brachytherapy or brachytherapy/chemotherapy had improved recurrence-free survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, respectively) and overall survival (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.79; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.69, respectively). Improved survival with brachytherapy and brachytherapy/chemotherapy persisted on multivariable analyses. Chemotherapy alone was also associated with improved overall survival compared with no adjuvant treatment (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant therapy was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence relative to observation alone. Adjuvant cuff brachytherapy with and without chemotherapy was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bryan M Fellman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kristina Lindemann
- The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Pamela T Soliman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA..
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bruce SF, Cho K, Noia H, Lomonosova E, Stock EC, Oplt A, Blachut B, Mullen MM, Kuroki LM, Hagemann AR, McCourt CK, Thaker PH, Khabele D, Powell MA, Mutch DG, Shriver LP, Patti GJ, Fuh KC. GAS6-AXL Inhibition by AVB-500 Overcomes Resistance to Paclitaxel in Endometrial Cancer by Decreasing Tumor Cell Glycolysis. Mol Cancer Ther 2022; 21:1348-1359. [PMID: 35588308 PMCID: PMC9370070 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Chemotherapy is often ineffective in advanced-stage and aggressive histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer. Overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL has been found to be associated with therapeutic resistance, metastasis, and poor prognosis. However, the mechanism of how inhibition of AXL improves response to chemotherapy is still largely unknown. Thus, we aimed to determine whether treatment with AVB-500, a selective inhibitor of GAS6-AXL, improves endometrial cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy particularly through metabolic changes. We found that both GAS6 and AXL expression were higher by immunohistochemistry in patient tumors with a poor response to chemotherapy compared with tumors with a good response to chemotherapy. We showed that chemotherapy-resistant endometrial cancer cells (ARK1, uterine serous carcinoma and PUC198, grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma) had improved sensitivity and synergy with paclitaxel and carboplatin when treated in combination with AVB-500. We also found that in vivo intraperitoneal models with ARK1 and PUC198 cells had decreased tumor burden when treated with AVB-500 + paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone. Treatment with AVB-500 + paclitaxel decreased AKT signaling, which resulted in a decrease in basal glycolysis. Finally, multiple glycolytic metabolites were lower in the tumors treated with AVB-500 + paclitaxel than in tumors treated with paclitaxel alone. Our study provides strong preclinical rationale for combining AVB-500 with paclitaxel in aggressive endometrial cancer models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaina F. Bruce
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kevin Cho
- Center for Metabolomics and Isotope Tracing, Department of Chemistry, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hollie Noia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Elena Lomonosova
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Elizabeth C. Stock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alyssa Oplt
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Barbara Blachut
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mary M. Mullen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lindsay M. Kuroki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrea R. Hagemann
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Carolyn K. McCourt
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Premal H. Thaker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew A. Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David G. Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Leah P. Shriver
- Center for Metabolomics and Isotope Tracing, Department of Chemistry, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Gary J. Patti
- Center for Metabolomics and Isotope Tracing, Department of Chemistry, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katherine C. Fuh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yuce Sari S, Guler OC, Oymak E, Gultekin M, Yigit E, Kahvecioglu A, Yuce K, Celik H, Usubutun A, Bolat F, Onal C, Yildiz F. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas: Comparison of characteristics and clinical outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:1876-1887. [PMID: 35385171 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess the rate of disease control and survival after adjuvant treatment in patients with uterine papillary serous (PSC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and compare the results between these two subtypes. METHODS The medical charts of 199 patients with de novo uterine PSC or CCC who underwent radiotherapy (RT) following surgery between 2001 and 2019 in three radiation oncology departments were retrospectively evaluated. Adjuvant treatment was decided by a multidisciplinary tumor board. All patients were planned to undergo adjuvant 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy with external beam RT (EBRT) and/or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). RESULTS Median age was 63 years for all, 64 years for PSC, and 59 years for CCC, respectively. Complete surgical staging was applied in 98% of patients. Histopathologic subtype was PSC in 142 (71%) and pure CCC in 57 (29%) patients, respectively. FIGO stage was I in 107 (54%), II in 35 (18%), and III in 57 (28%) patients, respectively. Lympho-vascular space invasion and positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) were present in 42% and 10% of patients, respectively. All patients but 23 (12%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 49.5 months for all patients, 43.9 months for patients with PSC, and 90.4 months for patients with CCC, respectively. During follow-up, 20 (10%) patients developed pelvic recurrence (PR) and 37 (19%) developed distant metastasis (DM). PSC subtype increased the PR and DM rates, although the latter not statistically significant. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rate was 73% and 69% for all patients, 71% and 66% for patients with PSC, and 77% and 75% for patients with CCC, respectively. The difference was more prominent in patients with stage ≥ IB disease. In multivariate analysis, advanced age and PPC significantly decreased all survival rates. CONCLUSION PSC has a worse prognosis than CCC with regard to pelvic and distant recurrence with a trend for decreased survival rates. Therefore, a more aggressive therapy is needed for patients with uterine PSC, particularly in patients with stage ≥ IB disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sezin Yuce Sari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Cem Guler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ezgi Oymak
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, İskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
| | - Melis Gultekin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ecem Yigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kunter Yuce
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Husnu Celik
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Baskent University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
| | - Alp Usubutun
- Department of Pathology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Filiz Bolat
- Department of Pathology, Baskent University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
| | - Cem Onal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ferah Yildiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Toboni MD, Lomonosova E, Bruce SF, Tankou JI, Mullen MM, Schab A, Oplt A, Noia H, Wilke D, Kuroki LM, Hagemann AR, McCourt CK, Thaker PH, Powell MA, Khabele D, Mutch DG, Fuh KC. Inhibition of AXL and VEGF-A Has Improved Therapeutic Efficacy in Uterine Serous Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5877. [PMID: 34884986 PMCID: PMC8656641 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer remains the most prevalent gynecologic cancer with continued rising incidence. A less common form of this cancer is uterine serous cancer, which represents 10% of endometrial cancer cases. However, this is the most aggressive cancer. The objective was to assess whether inhibiting the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL with AVB-500 in combination with bevacizumab would improve response in uterine serous cancer. To prove this, we conducted multiple angiogenesis assays including tube formation assays and angiogenesis invasion assays. In addition, we utilized mouse models with multiple cells lines and subsequently analyzed harvested tissue through immunohistochemistry CD31 staining to assess microvessel density. The combination treatment arms demonstrated decreased angiogenic potential in each assay. In addition, intraperitoneal mouse models demonstrated a significant decrease in tumor burden in two cell lines. The combination of AVB-500 and bevacizumab reduced tumor burden in vivo and reduced morphogenesis and migration in vitro which are vital to the process of angiogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D. Toboni
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Elena Lomonosova
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Shaina F. Bruce
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Jo’an I. Tankou
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Mary M. Mullen
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Angela Schab
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Alyssa Oplt
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Hollie Noia
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Danny Wilke
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Lindsay M. Kuroki
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Andrea R. Hagemann
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Carolyn K. McCourt
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Premal H. Thaker
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Matthew A. Powell
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - David G. Mutch
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
| | - Katherine C. Fuh
- Barnes Jewish Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (M.D.T.); (E.L.); (S.F.B.); (J.I.T.); (M.M.M.); (A.S.); (A.O.); (H.N.); (D.W.); (L.M.K.); (A.R.H.); (C.K.M.); (P.H.T.); (M.A.P.); (D.K.); (D.G.M.)
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ditto A, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Lopez S, Martinelli F, Bogani G, Lo Vullo S, Brusadelli C, Paolini B, Ducceschi M, Mantiero M, Chiappa V, Signorelli M, Evangelista M, Mariani L, Raspagliesi F. Uterine serous carcinoma: role of surgery, risk factors and oncologic outcomes. Experience of a tertiary center. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:268-274. [PMID: 34753617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors impacting survival outcomes in patients with uterine serous carcinoma (USC). METHODS Data of consecutive patients diagnosed with USC undergoing surgery between 2000 and 2020 at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan (Italy) were reviewed. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Records of 147 consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Stage distribution was: 67 (45.6%) patients with early-stage with uterine confined disease and 80 (54.4%) with advanced stages disease. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 43 patients (29.5%). The median follow-up period was 78.6 months (IQ range = 35.7-117.3 months). The overall recurrence rate was 41% (60 patients): 19/67 patients (28.4%) with early-stage disease and 41/80 patients (51.3%) with advanced stage. The 5-year PFS rate was 35.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.5-44.7%). In multivariate analysis, age, BMI, depth of myometrial invasion, cytology, and optimal cytoreduction with postoperative residual tumor absent significantly impacted on PFS. The 5-year OS rates were 46.5% (95% CI: 38.1-56.8). The result of multivariate analysis showed that there was significant difference in OS based only on optimal cytoreduction and accuracy of retroperitoneal surgery. CONCLUSIONS In apparent early-stage USC, peritoneal and retroperitoneal staging allows to identify patients with disease harboring outside the uterus. Optimal cytoreduction is the most significant prognostic factor. Further collaborative studies are warranted in order to improve outcomes of USC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Ditto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Lopez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Lo Vullo
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Brusadelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monika Ducceschi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mara Mantiero
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Signorelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Mariani
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tymon-Rosario J, Siegel ER, Bellone S, Harold J, Adjei N, Zeybek B, Mauricio D, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Ratner E, Clark M, Andikyan V, Huang GS, Azodi M, Schwartz PE, Fader AN, Santin AD. Trastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:93-99. [PMID: 34372971 PMCID: PMC8721852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Due to previously reported trastuzumab safety concerns and the scant data available in endometrial cancer patients, we sought to assess the safety, tolerability and toxicity profile of trastuzumab in patients with advanced/recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC) that overexpress HER2/neu in our multicenter randomized phase II trial. METHODS Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) for 6 cycles ± trastuzumab (T) with the experimental arm continuing to receive single agent trastuzumab maintenance treatment until disease progression/toxicity. Progression-free-survival was the primary endpoint; overall-survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment arms. RESULTS There were 28 patients in the C/P arm and 32 patients in the experimental (C/P + T) arm. Fifty-eight patients (97%) experienced 977 treatment-related AEs of which 875 (89.6%) were low-grade (grade 1-2) and 102 (10.4%) were high-grade (grade 3-5). The mean ± standard deviation of AEs per patient was 15.5 ± 16.3 in the C/P arm and 17.0 ± 16.0 in the C/P + T arm. Gastrointestinal AEs were the most common in both arms (n = 155, 15.7%) of which 94.2% were low-grade (n = 146). Importantly, no significant difference between treatment arms was detected in any system-organ class of AE including cardiac AE. Five (17%) of 29 patients who received prolonged trastuzumab maintenance therapy had no sign of cumulative toxicity after an average (range) of 5.1 (4.2-6.3) years. CONCLUSIONS Trastuzumab appears to be safe and has a manageable toxicity profile both when used in combination with chemotherapy and when used for single agent maintenance in patients with HER2/neu positive USC. This safety profile is reassuring given the proven efficacy of trastuzumab in advanced/recurrent HER2/neu positive USC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Eric R Siegel
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Stefania Bellone
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Justin Harold
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Naomi Adjei
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Burak Zeybek
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Dennis Mauricio
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gary Altwerger
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gulden Menderes
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Elena Ratner
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Mitchell Clark
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Vaagn Andikyan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Gloria S Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Masoud Azodi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | - Peter E Schwartz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA
| | | | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dallaire Nantel L, Renaud MC, Gregoire J, Sebastianelli A, Plante M. High-grade endometrial carcinoma limited to the endometrium or a polyp: is adjuvant treatment necessary? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1335-1340. [PMID: 34518241 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High-grade endometrial carcinoma limited to the endometrium or a polyp is a rare clinical entity. Currently there is no consensus on standard treatment. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with type II endometrial carcinoma without myometrial infiltration or limited to a polyp. METHODS We retrospectively identified type II endometrial carcinoma (FIGO endometrioid grade 3, serous, clear cell, mixed and carcinosarcoma) with spread limited to the endometrium or a polyp from April 2013 to November 2017. Medical records were reviewed for the following information: age at diagnosis, patient characteristics, type of surgery, histology, stage according to FIGO 2009 classification, adjuvant treatments, and site of recurrence. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier estimate were used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 25 patients with a type II stage IA adenocarcinoma were included. All were surgically staged with total hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph nodes assessment. The median age at diagnosis was 69 years. All patients had either disease limited to the endometrium (60%) or a polyp (40%). Only four patients had lymphovascular space invasion (16%). The median follow-up was 44 (range 2-67) months. Six patients (24%) received vault brachytherapy only and all others received no adjuvant treatment after surgery (n=19, 76%). Three patients (12%) experienced recurrences at 15, 21, and 55 months after surgery. Following systemic treatment all are alive and disease-free. The 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 91% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION Expectant management with surveillance alone following surgery appears to be safe for patients with high-grade endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or the endometrium without myometrial invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jean Gregoire
- Gynecology Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Marie Plante
- Gynecology Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Corey L, Fucinari J, Elshaikh M, Schultz D, Mussallam R, Zaiem F, Daaboul F, Fehmi O, Dyson G, Ruterbusch J, Morris R, Cote ML, Ali-Fehmi R, Bandyopadhyay S. Impact of positive cytology in uterine serous carcinoma: A reassessment. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 37:100830. [PMID: 34345643 PMCID: PMC8319448 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prognostic implications of peritoneal cytology in uterine serous cancer are unclear. Positive cytology is not associated with FIGO stage or LVSI. Peritoneal cytology is an independent prognosticator in uterine serous cancer. Positive cytology is independently associated with worse overall survival and ECSS.
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of peritoneal cytology status among other clinicopathological parameters in uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Methods A retrospective study of 148 patients diagnosed with uterine serous carcinoma from 1997 to 2016 at two academic medical centers in the Detroit metropolitan area was done. A central gynecologic pathologist reviewed all available slides and confirmed the histologic diagnosis of each case of USC. We assessed the prognostic impact of various clinicopathological parameters on overall survival (OS) and endometrial cancer-specific survival (ECSS). Those parameters included race, body mass index (BMI), stage at diagnosis, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), peritoneal cytology status, receipt of adjuvant treatment, and comorbidity count using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We used Cox proportional hazards models and 95% confidence intervals for statistical analysis. Results Positive peritoneal cytology had a statistically significant effect on OS (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: [1.19, 3.68]) and on ECSS (HR: 2.02, 95% CI: [1.06 – 3.82]). LVSI had a statistically significant effect on both OS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: [1.14, 4.53]) and ECSS (HR: 3.45, 95% CI: [1.49, 7.99]). Black or African American (AA) race was also found to have a significant effect on both OS (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: [1.07, 3.47]) and ECSS (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: [1.02, 3.98]). Other factors including BMI and tumor size > 1 cm did not show a statistically significant impact on OS or ECSS. Conclusions Peritoneal washings with positive cytology and LVSI are important prognostic tools that may have a significant impact on overall survival in USC and can be used as independent negative prognosticators to help guide adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan Corey
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, Michigan.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Juliana Fucinari
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Population Sciences and Disparities Research, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | - Rami Mussallam
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Feras Zaiem
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Fayez Daaboul
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Omar Fehmi
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Greg Dyson
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Julie Ruterbusch
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Robert Morris
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, Michigan.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Michelle L Cote
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, Michigan.,Karmanos Cancer Institute, Population Sciences and Disparities Research, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Rouba Ali-Fehmi
- Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ferriss JS, Erickson BK, Shih IM, Fader AN. Uterine serous carcinoma: key advances and novel treatment approaches. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1165-1174. [PMID: 34210768 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence and mortality rates from endometrial cancer continue to increase worldwide, while rates in most other cancers have either plateaued or declined considerably. Uterine serous carcinoma represents a fraction of all endometrial malignancies each year, yet this histology is responsible for nearly 40% of all endometrial cancer-related deaths. These deaths disproportionately affect black women, who have higher rates of advanced disease at diagnosis. Molecular genetic analyses reveal major alterations including TP53 mutation, PIK3CA mutation/amplification, ERBB2 amplification, CCNE1 amplification, FBXW7 mutation/deletion, PPP2R1A mutation, and somatic mutations involving homologous recombination genes. Clinical risk factors for uterine serous carcinoma include advancing age, a history of breast cancer, tamoxifen usage, and the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Recent advances in our understanding of uterine serous carcinoma molecular drivers have led to development of targeted therapeutics that promise improved outcomes for patients. Overexpression or amplification of HER2 in uterine serous carcinoma carries a poor prognosis; yet this actionable target has led to the incorporation of several anti-HER2 therapies, including trastuzumab which, when added to conventional chemotherapy, is associated with improved survival for women with advanced and recurrent HER2-positive disease. The combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is also a promising targeted treatment strategy for women with uterine serous carcinoma, with a recent phase II study suggesting a 50% response rate in women with recurrent disease. Several trials examining additional targeted agents are ongoing. Despite years of stalled progress, meaningful, tailored treatment options are emerging for patients with this uncommon and biologically aggressive endometrial cancer subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Stuart Ferriss
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Britt K Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- TeLinde Gynecologic Pathology Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Crain CN, Ngwanyam R, Punch G. Rare brain metastasis with unusual characteristics in a late recurrence of stage IIIA uterine papillary serous carcinoma. BJR Case Rep 2021; 7:20200157. [PMID: 35047191 PMCID: PMC8749405 DOI: 10.1259/bjrcr.20200157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a rare endometrial neoplasm with high mortality rates. While the malignancy has often metastasized to distant organs by the time of diagnosis, brain lesions are extremely rare and most commonly only observed in widely disseminated disease. Here, we present an unusual case of UPSC with brain metastasis discovered six years after undergoing treatment for stage IIIA disease. Compared to the few previous cases of brain metastasis from UPSC, this lesion exhibited unusual imaging characteristics. We also highlight a potential imaging interpretation pitfall which was associated with this case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Remy Ngwanyam
- Department of Radiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Gregory Punch
- Department of Radiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Han Y, Liu C. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma: A SEER program analysis of 1016 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:2460-2472. [PMID: 33870589 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To identify the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and the prognostic factors influencing survival. METHODS The retrospective, population-based cohort study enrolled patients with USC diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 for the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to identify survival outcomes, multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the risk factors influencing the disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 1016 patients with USC from the SEER database were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 65 years. The 5-year OS was 48.5%, and the 5-year DSS rates were 58.0%, respectively. In the univariate analyses, AJCC stage, SEER summary stage, number of lymph nodes resected, and adjuvant therapy were significant predictors for OS and DSS, while grade, was significant only for OS. Multivariate Cox regression models demonstrated that poor grade, stage III/IV, distant disease, the number of lymph nodes resected being <4 and no adjuvant treatment were independent risk factors for poor OS, while stage III/IV, regional or distant disease, the number of lymph nodes <4 and no adjuvant treatment were independent risk factors for poor DSS. Multivariate Cox regression models also identified that chemotherapy and combination therapies were the independent risk factors for improved OS and DSS of early-stage USC. CONCLUSION USC had a relatively poor prognosis compared with endometriod carcinoma. Moreover, advanced stage and fewer lymph nodes resected were independent negative prognostic factors for survival, while adjuvant therapy was significant for improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chongdong Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Adjuvant vaginal interventional radiotherapy in early-stage non-endometrioid carcinoma of corpus uteri: a systematic review. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:231-243. [PMID: 33897798 PMCID: PMC8060961 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review focused on rare histological types of corpus uteri malignancy, including uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), and uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC), and it is proposed to assist with clinical decision-making. Adjuvant treatment decisions must be made based on available evidences. We mainly investigated the role of vaginal interventional radiotherapy (VIRt) in UCS, UCCC, and UPSC managements. Material and methods A systematic research using PubMed and Cochrane library was conducted to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of VIRt in early-stage UPSC, UCCC, and UCS. A search in ClinicalTrials.gov was performed in order to detect ongoing or recently completed trials as well as in PROSPERO for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Survival outcomes and toxicity rates were obtained. Results All studies were retrospective. For UCS, the number of evaluated patients was 432. The 2- to 5-year average local control (LC) was 91% (range, 74.2-96%), disease-free survival (DFS) 88% (range, 82-94%), overall survival (OS) 79% (range, 53.8-84.3%), the average 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 70% (range, 70-94%), and G3-G4 toxicity was 0%. For UCCC, the number of investigated patients was 335 (UCCC – 124, mixed – 211), with an average 5-year LC of 100%, DFS of 83% (range, 82-90%), OS of 93% (range, 83-100%), and G3-G4 toxicity of 0%. For UPSC, the number of examined patients was 1,092 (UPSC – 866, mixed – 226). The average 5-year LC was 97% (range, 87.1-100%), DFS 84% (range, 74.7-95.6%), OS 93% (range, 71.9-100%), CSS 89% (range, 78.9-94%), and G3-G4 toxicity was 0%. Conclusions These data suggest that in adequately selected early-stage UPSC and UCCC patients, VIRt alone may be suitable in women who underwent surgical staging and received adjuvant chemotherapy. In early-stage UCS, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach has to be planned, considering high-rate of pelvic and distant relapses.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cook A, Khalil R, Burmeister C, Dimitrova I, Elshaikh MA. The Impact of Adjuvant Management Strategies on Outcomes in Women With Early Stage Uterine Serous Carcinoma. Cureus 2021; 13:e13505. [PMID: 33786214 PMCID: PMC7992918 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the impact of different adjuvant strategies on outcomes in women with early-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC). Methods Our retrospective database for women with endometrial carcinoma was queried for women with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-II USC who underwent surgical staging between January 1991 and April 2019 followed by adjuvant management (observation, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT), or combined modality treatment (CRT)). Chi-square tests were performed to compare differences in outcome by type of adjuvant management. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to identify statistically significant predictors of survival endpoints. Results We identified 171 women who met our inclusion criteria. The median follow-up time was 70.5 months. Seventy-five percent of the study cohort was FIGO stage IA, 13% were stage IB, and 12% were stage II. All women underwent pelvic lymph node dissection with a median number of dissected lymph nodes of 14. Omentectomy was performed in 64% of patients. Adjuvant RT was utilized in 56% of women (65 patients received vaginal brachytherapy alone, 10 patients received pelvic RT, and 21 patients received a combination of both). The most commonly used chemotherapy regimen was carboplatin and paclitaxel with a median number of cycles of six. A total of 44% of the cohort received CRT, 12% received RT alone, 19% received chemo alone, and 25% were observed. Five-year RFS was 73% for those who received CRT, 84% for those who received RT alone, 68% for those who received CT alone, and 55% for those who were observed (p=0.13). Five-year DSS was 81%, 94%, 71%, and 60%, respectively (p=0.02). Five-year OS was 76%, 70%, 60%, and 56%, respectively (p=0.11). On MVA of OS and DSS, a higher percentage of myometrial invasion, the presence of lower uterine segment involvement, positive peritoneal cytology, and receipt of chemotherapy alone/observation were independent predictors of worse outcomes. The sole independent predictor of worse RFS on MVA was the presence of positive peritoneal cytology. Conclusion In this cohort of women with early-stage USC who underwent surgical staging, adjuvant radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy was associated with improved survival endpoints and trended toward improved recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Cook
- Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | | | | | - Irina Dimitrova
- Gynecologic Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Uterine serous carcinoma: Molecular features, clinical management, and new and future therapies. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:322-332. [PMID: 33160694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer. Multimodality treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy is commonly used, given its propensity for extrauterine spread, distant recurrences, and poor prognosis. However, the use of molecularly-based therapy is expanding. Here, we review key molecular features of USC, discuss current management, and assess the landscape of novel therapies and combinations.
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang Y, Huang Y, Yin Y, Fan Y, Sun W, Zhao X, Tucker K, Staley A, Paraghamian S, Hawkins G, Prabhu V, Allen JE, Zhou C, Bae-Jump V. ONC206, an Imipridone Derivative, Induces Cell Death Through Activation of the Integrated Stress Response in Serous Endometrial Cancer In Vitro. Front Oncol 2020; 10:577141. [PMID: 33194693 PMCID: PMC7641618 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.577141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
ONC206 (Oncoceutics) is an imipiridone with nanomolar potency and analogue of ONC201, a selective dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) antagonist currently being investigated in phase II clinical trials for serous endometrial cancer (SEC). This study investigated the anti-proliferative efficacy of ONC206 in SEC cell lines as well as its impact on cellular stress and adhesion/invasion. ONC206 inhibited cellular proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and was more potent than ONC201 in the ARK1 (IC50 = 0.33µM vs. IC50 = 1.59uM) and SPEC-2 (IC50 = 0.24uM vs. IC50 = 0.81uM) cell lines. Treatment with ONC206 resulted in induction of ROS production and reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential, accompanied by an increase in cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-9 activity (p < 0.01). ONC206 also significantly inhibited cellular adhesion and migration in both cell lines (p < 0.01). Pretreatment with the stress inhibitor N-acetylcysteine (NAC) significantly attenuated the efficacy of ONC206 on cell proliferation, ROS production and cellular invasion. ONC206 demonstrates nanomolar potency for the inhibition of proliferation in SEC cells. Specifically, ONC206 utilizes ISR activation as a significant pathway in the propagation of its anti-proliferative and anti-metastatic effects. Thus, ONC206 may be a promising agent in future SEC clinical trials as was its predecessor ONC201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingao Zhang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Yu Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yajie Yin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Yali Fan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenchuan Sun
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Xiaoling Zhao
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Allison Staley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Sarah Paraghamian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Gabrielle Hawkins
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | | | - Chunxiao Zhou
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Victoria Bae-Jump
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hu W, Zhang L, Ferri-Borgogno S, Kwan SY, Lewis KE, Cun HT, Yeung TL, Soliman PT, Tarapore RS, Allen JE, Guan X, Lu KH, Mok SC, Au-Yeung CL. Targeting Dopamine Receptor D2 by Imipridone Suppresses Uterine Serous Cancer Malignant Phenotype. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092436. [PMID: 32867127 PMCID: PMC7563948 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine serous cancer (USC) is an aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer, with poor survival and high recurrence rates. The development of novel and effective therapies specific to USC would aid in its management. However, few studies have focused solely on this rare subtype. The current study demonstrated that the orally bioavailable, investigational new drug and novel imipridone ONC206 suppressed USC cell proliferation and induced apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. Disruption of the DRD2-mediated p38MAPK/ERK/PGC-1α network by ONC206 led to metabolic reprogramming and suppression of both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. ONC206 also synergized with paclitaxel in reducing USC cell viability. In addition, DRD2 overexpression correlated with poor overall survival in patients. This study provides the first evidence that ONC206 induced metabolic reprogramming in USC cells and is a promising therapeutic agent for USC treatment. These findings support further development of ONC206 as a promising therapeutic agent and improves survival rates in patients with USC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Hu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China;
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Sammy Ferri-Borgogno
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Suet-Ying Kwan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Kelsey E. Lewis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA;
| | - Han T. Cun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Tsz-Lun Yeung
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Pamela T. Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | | | - Joshua E. Allen
- Oncoceutics Inc., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (R.S.T.); (J.E.A.)
| | - Xinyuan Guan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China;
| | - Karen H. Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Samuel C. Mok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Chi-Lam Au-Yeung
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (L.Z.); (S.F.-B.); (H.T.C.); (T.-L.Y.); (P.T.S.); (K.H.L.); (S.C.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Erickson BK, Najjar O, Damast S, Blakaj A, Tymon-Rosario J, Shahi M, Santin A, Klein M, Dolan M, Cimino-Mathews A, Buza N, Ferriss JS, Stone RL, Khalifa M, Fader AN. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:17-22. [PMID: 32709539 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has emerged as an important prognostic and therapeutic target in advanced stage and recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC). The significance of tumoral HER2 expression in early-stage disease has not been established. METHODS This multi-center cohort study included women with stage I USC treated from 2000 to 2019. Demographic, treatment, recurrence, and survival data were collected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for HER2 and scored 0-3+. Equivocal IHC results (2+) were further tested with fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 positivity was defined as 3+ IHC or FISH positive. RESULTS One hundred sixty-nine patients with stage I USC were tested for HER2; 26% were HER2-positive. There were no significant differences in age, race, stage, adjuvant therapy, or follow-up duration between the HER2-positive and negative cohorts. Presence of lymph-vascular space invasion was correlated with HER2-positive tumors (p = .003). After a median follow-up of 50 months, there were 43 (25.4%) recurrences. There were significantly more recurrences in the HER2-positive cohort (50.0% vs 16.8%, p < .001). HER2 positive tumors were associated with worse progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < .001 and p = .024). On multivariate analysis, HER2 positive tumors were associated with inferior PFS (aHR 3.50, 95%CI 1.84-6.67; p < .001) and OS (aHR 2.00, 95%CI 1.04-3.88; p = .039) compared to HER2-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS Given its significant association with worse recurrence and survival outcomes, HER2 positivity appears to be a prognostic biomarker in women with stage I uterine serous carcinoma. These data provide support for clinical trials with anti-HER2-directed therapy in early-stage disease.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
- Biomarkers, Tumor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/diagnosis
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Hysterectomy
- Immunohistochemistry
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Progression-Free Survival
- Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data
- United States/epidemiology
- Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Uterine Neoplasms/mortality
- Uterine Neoplasms/pathology
- Uterine Neoplasms/therapy
- Uterus/pathology
- Uterus/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt K Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Omar Najjar
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shari Damast
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Adriana Blakaj
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joan Tymon-Rosario
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Maryam Shahi
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alessandro Santin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Molly Klein
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Michelle Dolan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - J Stuart Ferriss
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mahmoud Khalifa
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nasioudis D, Roy AG, Ko EM, Cory L, Giuntoli II RL, Haggerty AF, Kim SH, Morgan MA, Latif NA. Adjuvant treatment for patients with FIGO stage I uterine serous carcinoma confined to the endometrium. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1089-1094. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesThe role of adjuvant treatment for early-stage uterine serous carcinoma is not defined. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of adjuvant treatment on survival of patients with tumors confined to the endometrium.MethodsPatients diagnosed with stage I uterine serous carcinoma with no myometrial invasion between January 2004 and December 2015 who underwent hysterectomy with at least 10 lymph nodes removed were identified from the National Cancer Database. Adjuvant treatment patterns defined as receipt of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy within 6 months from surgery were investigated and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and compared with the log-rank test for patients with at least one month of follow-up. A Cox analysis was performed to control for confounders.ResultsA total of 1709 patients were identified; 833 (48.7%) did not receive adjuvant treatment, 348 (20.4%) received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 353 (20.7%) received chemotherapy only, and 175 (10.2%) received radiotherapy only. Five-year overall survival rates for patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (n=736) was 81.9%, compared with 91.3% for those who had chemoradiation (n=293), 85.1% for those who received radiotherapy only (n=143), and 91.0% for those who received chemotherapy only (n=298) (p<0.001). After controlling for age, insurance status, type of treatment facility, tumor size, co-morbidities, and history of another tumor, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42, 0.96), or chemoradiation (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35, 0.88) had better survival compared with those who did not receive any adjuvant treatment, while there was no benefit from radiotherapy alone (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53, 1.37). There was no survival difference between chemoradiation and chemotherapy only (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.65, 2.01).ConclusionAdjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) is associated with a survival benefit for uterine serous carcinoma confined to the endometrium.
Collapse
|
26
|
Najjar O, Erickson BK, Nickles-Fader AN. Diagnosis and management of uterine serous carcinoma: current strategies and clinical challenges. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/21678707.2020.1784723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Najjar
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Britt K. Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Amanda N. Nickles-Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin–Paclitaxel Compared with Carboplatin–Paclitaxel–Trastuzumab in Advanced (Stage III–IV) or Recurrent Uterine Serous Carcinomas that Overexpress Her2/Neu (NCT01367002): Updated Overall Survival Analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:3928-3935. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
28
|
The role of vaginal brachytherapy in stage I endometrial serous cancer: a systematic review. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:61-66. [PMID: 32190072 PMCID: PMC7073340 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.92698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Serous adenocarcinoma (uterine serous carcinoma – USC) is a rare and aggressive histologic subtype of endometrial cancer, with a high-rate of recurrence and poor prognosis. The adjuvant treatment for stage I patients is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of stage I USC treated exclusively with chemotherapy plus vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). Material and methods A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was conducted to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of VBT in patients with stage I USC. A search in ClinicalTrials.gov was performed in order to detect ongoing or recently completed trials, and in PROSPERO for searching ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Results All studies were retrospective and 364 of evaluated patients were found. The average local control was 97.5% (range, 91-100%), the disease free-survival was 88% (range, 82-94%), the overall survival was 93% (range, 72-100%), the specific cancer survival was 89.4% (range, 84.8-94%), and the G3-G4 toxicity was 0-8%. Conclusions These data support the concept that in adequately selected patients, VBT alone may be a suitable radiotherapy technique in women with stage I USC who underwent surgical staging and received adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Erickson BK, Zeybek B, Santin AD, Fader AN. Targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in gynecologic malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020; 32:57-64. [PMID: 31833974 PMCID: PMC7307693 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to describe the role of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a biomarker and potential target in gynecologic malignancies and to describe contemporary updates in the use of anti-HER2 treatments for these cancers. RECENT FINDINGS Approximately 25-30% of all patients with uterine serous carcinoma overexpress tumoral HER2. The anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab represents an effective, targeted therapy with significant efficacy in the treatment of HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer. Recently, trastuzumab efficacy has also been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial of women with advanced or recurrent uterine serous carcinoma. Additionally, trastuzumab may be effective in women with HER2-positive uterine carcinosarcoma. The role of anti-HER2 therapy is unclear in women with other gynecologic malignancies but is being evaluated. SUMMARY HER2 amplification/overexpression is an effective therapeutic target in select gynecologic malignancies, and especially in the rare endometrial cancer subtype, uterine serous carcinoma. As anti-HER2-targeted therapies become increasingly available, more treatment options may become available for women with HER2-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt K. Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Burak Zeybek
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Amanda N. Fader
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Welp A, Temkin S, Sullivan S. Distant recurrence in a patient with polyp-confined stage IA serous endometrial carcinoma treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: A case report and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2020; 31:100512. [PMID: 31890830 PMCID: PMC6928279 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.100512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine serous carcinoma is a rare, high-risk histological subtype of endometrial cancer, and use of adjuvant treatment in early stage IA disease is inconsistent, especially when the tumor is confined entirely within an endometrial polyp. We herein present a case of extrauterine recurrence in a 67-year-old female with polyp-confined, stage IA uterine serous endometrial cancer. She underwent comprehensive surgical staging with the pathology returning a 5 cm uterine serous carcinoma confined completely to a 7 cm polyp with negative margins, negative myometrial and lymphovascular space invasion, and twenty-nine negative para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes. She went on to complete six cycles of adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel. She presented with a new pleural effusion approximately 20 months after receiving definitive treatment, and a diagnosis of recurrent, metastatic uterine serous carcinoma was confirmed through cytology. A review of the literature suggests practice patterns involving adjuvant treatment for polyp-confined stage IA uterine serous carcinoma are highly variable. Prospective studies clarifying the utility of adjuvant treatment for polyp-confined disease in comprehensively staged patients, especially pertaining to the impact this pathology has on recurrence risk, are needed for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalyn Welp
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23219, United States
| | - Sarah Temkin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD 21401, United States
| | - Stephanie Sullivan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA 23219, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gómez-Raposo C, Merino Salvador M, Aguayo Zamora C, Casado Saenz E. Adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85:477-486. [PMID: 31950214 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-04027-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is controversial in endometrial carcinoma (EC). Surgery alone is usually curative for women who are at a low risk of disease recurrence. The treatment of EC following surgical staging is based on the risk of relapse, which is defined by the cancer stage at diagnosis, histology of the tumor and other prognostic factors such as grade differentiation, the presence of substantial lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), or depth of myometrial invasion (MI). External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) improved local control and are used as adjuvant treatment for early-stage disease. The role of adjuvant CT is controversial in early-stage EC, and there is no uniform approach to the treatment of women with stage III EC or early-staged non-endometrioid EC. Available evidence did not support the indication of adjuvant CT in stage I-II endometroid EC. In those cases at higher risk of relapse, defined as grade 3 tumors with substantial (no focal) LVSI, specifically with deep MI or cervical involvement, could be considered. Adjuvant CT should be administered to stage III EC patients. When RT is indicated (extensive lymph node involvement or deep MI), sequential treatment with RT or "sandwich" regimen may be considered rather than concurrent CRT. The patients with stage IA MI or IB USC may be offered adjuvant CT alone or in combination with VBT, whereas in stage II uterine serous carcinoma patients adding EBRT may be reasonable. Management approach for patients with stage IA without MI USC who underwent a comprehensive surgery remains controversial, and surveillance alone or CT plus VBT is an appropriate option. Early-stage clear-cell carcinoma patients might not benefit for adjuvant CT, but stage III patients might benefit from the combination of CT and EBRT. Stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma patients might be offered adjuvant CT followed by RT or as a "sandwich" régimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Gómez-Raposo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
| | - María Merino Salvador
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Aguayo Zamora
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Casado Saenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Avenida de Europa 34, 28702, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schlappe BA, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Ducie J, Zahl Eriksson AG, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Glaser GE, Abu-Rustum NR, Mariani A, Leitao MM. Multicenter study comparing oncologic outcomes after lymph node assessment via a sentinel lymph node algorithm versus comprehensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:62-69. [PMID: 31776037 PMCID: PMC6980738 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare survival after nodal assessment using a sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm versus comprehensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy (LND) in serous or clear cell endometrial carcinoma, and to compare survival in node-negative cases. METHODS Three-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were compared between one institution that used comprehensive LND to the renal veins and a second institution that used an SLN algorithm with ultra-staging with inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) derived from propensity scores to adjust for covariate imbalance between cohorts. RESULTS 214 patients were identified (118 SLN cohort, 96 LND cohort). Adjuvant therapy differed between the cohorts; 84% and 40% in the SLN and LND cohorts, respectively, received chemotherapy ± radiation therapy. The IPTW-adjusted 3-year RFS rates were 69% and 80%, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted 3-year OS rates were 88% and 77%, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the association of surgical approach (SLN vs LND) with progression and death was 1.46 (95% CI: 0.70-3.04) and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.19-1.02), respectively. In the 168 node-negative cases, the IPTW-adjusted 3-year RFS rates were 73% and 91%, respectively. The IPTW-adjusted 3-year OS rates were 88% and 86%, respectively. In this subgroup, IPTW-adjusted HR for the association of surgical approach (SLN vs LND) with progression and death was 3.12 (95% CI: 1.02-9.57) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.24-1.95), respectively. CONCLUSION OS was not compromised with the SLN algorithm. SLN may be associated with a decreased RFS but similar OS in node-negative cases despite the majority receiving chemotherapy. This may be due to differences in surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke A Schlappe
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy L Weaver
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michaela E McGree
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer Ducie
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean C Dowdy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William A Cliby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gretchen E Glaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chen L, Liu X, Li M, Wang S, Zhou H, Liu L, Cheng X. A novel model to predict cancer-specific survival in patients with early-stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). Cancer Med 2019; 9:988-998. [PMID: 31846222 PMCID: PMC6997089 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stage I-II uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) has aggressive biological behavior and leads to poor prognosis. However, clinicopathologic risk factors to predict cancer-specific survival of patients with stage I-II UPSC were still unclear. This study was undertaken to develop a prediction model of survival in patients with early-stage UPSC. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 964 patients were identified with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II UPSC who underwent at least hysterectomy between 2004 and 2015. By considering competing risk events for survival outcomes, we used proportional subdistribution hazards regression to compare cancer-specific death (CSD) for all patients. Based on the results of univariate and multivariate analysis, the variables were selected to construct a predictive model; and the prediction results of the model were visualized using a nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival and the response to adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy of stage I-II UPSC patients. RESULTS The median age of the cohort was 67 years. One hundred and sixty five patients (17.1%) died of UPSC (CSD), while 8.6% of the patients died from other causes (non-CSD). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 67 (HR = 1.45, P = .021), tumor size ≥ 2 cm (HR = 1.81, P = .014) and >10 regional nodes removed (HR = 0.52, P = .002) were significantly associated with cumulative incidence of CSD. In the age ≥67 cohort, FIGO stage IB-II was a risk factor for CSD (HR = 1.83, P = .036), and >10 lymph nodes removed was a protective factor (HR = 0.50, P = .01). Both adjuvant chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy alone decreased CSD of patients with stage I-II UPSC older than 67 years (HR = 0.47, P = .022; HR = 0.52, P = .024, respectively). The prediction model had great risk stratification ability as the high-risk group had higher cumulative incidence of CSD than the low-risk group (P < .001). In the high-risk group, patients with post-operative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had improved CSD compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy nor chemotherapy (P = .037). However, there was no such benefit in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION Our prediction model of CSD based on proportional subdistribution hazards regression showed a good performance in predicting the cancer-specific survival of early-stage UPSC patients and contributed to guide clinical treatment decision, helping oncologists and patients with early-stage UPSC to decide whether to choose adjuvant therapy or not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihua Chen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaona Liu
- Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengjiao Li
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuoer Wang
- Central Laboratory, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongyu Zhou
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mysona DP, Tran LKH, Tran PMH, Gehrig PA, Van Le L, Ghamande S, Rungruang BJ, Java J, Mann AK, Liao J, Kapp DS, Santos BD, She JX, Chan JK. Clinical calculator predictive of chemotherapy benefit in stage 1A uterine papillary serous cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 156:77-84. [PMID: 31796203 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine the utility of a clinical calculator to predict the benefit of chemotherapy in stage IA uterine papillary serous cancer (UPSC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were collected from NCDB from years 2010-2014. Based on demographic and surgical characteristics, a clinical score was developed using the random survival forest machine learning algorithm. RESULTS Of 1,751 patients with stage IA UPSC, 1,012 (58%) received chemotherapy and 739 (42%) did not. Older age (HR 1.06), comorbidities (HR 1.31), larger tumor size (HR 1.27), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.86), positive peritoneal cytology (HR 2.62), no pelvic lymph node dissection (HR 1.51), and no chemotherapy (HR 2.16) were associated with poorer prognosis. Compared to no chemotherapy, patients who underwent chemotherapy had a 5-year overall survival of 80% vs. 67%. To better delineate those who may derive more benefit from chemotherapy, we designed a clinical calculator capable of dividing patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups with associated 5-year OS of 86%, 73%, and 53%, respectively. Using the calculator to assess the relative benefit of chemotherapy in each risk group, chemotherapy improved the 5-year OS in the high (42% to 64%; p < 0.001) and moderate risk group (66% to 79%; p < 0.001) but did not benefit the low risk group (84% to 87%; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION Our results suggest a clinical calculator is useful for counseling and personalizing chemotherapy for stage IA UPSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D P Mysona
- The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; The Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - L K H Tran
- The Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - P M H Tran
- The Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - P A Gehrig
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - L Van Le
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S Ghamande
- The Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - B J Rungruang
- The Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - J Java
- Genomics Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - A K Mann
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - J Liao
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - D S Kapp
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - J X She
- The Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA; Jinfinti Precision Medicine, Inc, Augusta, GA, USA.
| | - J K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA; California Pacific & Palo Alto Medical Foundation/Sutter Health Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zeng X, Baba T, Hamanishi J, Matsumura N, Kharma B, Mise Y, Abiko K, Yamaguchi K, Horikawa N, Hunstman DG, Mulati K, Kitamura S, Taki M, Murakami R, Hosoe Y, Mandai M. Phosphorylation of STAT1 serine 727 enhances platinum resistance in uterine serous carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:1635-1647. [PMID: 31228268 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a highly aggressive histological subtype of endometrial cancers harboring highly metastatic and chemoresistant features. Our previous study showed that STAT1 is highly expressed in USC and acts as a key molecule that is positively correlated with tumor progression, but it remains unclear whether STAT1 is relevant to the malicious chemorefractory nature of USC. In the present study, we investigated the regulatory role of STAT1 toward platinum-cytotoxicity in USC. STAT1 suppression sensitized USC cells to increase cisplatin-mediated apoptosis (p < 0.001). Furthermore, phosphorylation of STAT1 was prominently observed on serine-727 (pSTAT1-Ser727), but not on tyrosine-701, in the nucleus of USC cells treated with cisplatin. Mechanistically, the inhibition of pSTAT1-Ser727 by dominant-negative plasmid elevated cisplatin-mediated apoptosis by increasing intracellular accumulation of cisplatin through upregulation of CTR1 expression. TBB has an inhibitory effect on casein kinase 2 (CK2), which phosphorylate STAT1 at serine residues. Sequential treatment with TBB and cisplatin on USC cells greatly reduced nuclear pSTAT1-Ser727, enhanced intracellular accumulation of cisplatin, and subsequently increased apoptosis. Tumor load was significantly reduced by combination therapy of TBB and cisplatin in in vivo xenograft models (p < 0.001). Our results collectively suggest that pSTAT1-Ser727 may play a key role in platinum resistance as well as tumor progression in USC. Thus, targeting the STAT1 pathway via CK2 inhibitor can be a novel method for attenuating the chemorefractory nature of USC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Zeng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Junzo Hamanishi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Noriomi Matsumura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Budiman Kharma
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuka Mise
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kaoru Abiko
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ken Yamaguchi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoki Horikawa
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - David G Hunstman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kumuluzi Mulati
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sachiko Kitamura
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mana Taki
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Murakami
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuko Hosoe
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaki Mandai
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic factors of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) vary among studies, and there is no report of Chinese USC patients. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with USC. METHODS Patients with USC from 13 authoritative university hospitals in China and treated between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Three-year disease-free survival rate (DFSR), cumulative recurrence, and cumulative mortality were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to model the association of potential prognostic factors with clinical outcomes. RESULTS Data of a total of 241 patients were reviewed. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 1-128 months). Median age was 60 years (range, 39-84 years), and 58.0% had stages I-II disease. The 3-year DFSR and cumulative recurrence were 46.8% and 27.7%. Advanced stage (III and IV) (P = 0.004), myometrial invasion (P = 0.001), adnexal involvement (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.025), and positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.007) were independently associated with 3-year DFSR. Advanced stage (P = 0.017), myometrial invasion (P = 0.008), adnexal involvement (odds ratio, 2.987; P = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.031), and positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.001) were independently associated with the cumulative recurrence. Myometrial invasion (P = 0.004) and positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.025) were independently associated with 3-year cumulative mortality. CONCLUSIONS Peritoneal cytology and myometrial invasion could be independent prognostic factors for 3-year DFSR, cumulative recurrence, and cumulative mortality of patients with USC. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
|
37
|
Helpman L, Perri T, Lavee N, Hag-Yahia N, Chariski HA, Kalfon S, Derazne E, Beiner ME, Kadan Y, Fishman A, Korach J, Covens A, Gien L. Impact of adjuvant treatment on outcome in high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective three-center study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:133-139. [PMID: 30640695 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High grade and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers carry a poor prognosis, and the lack of randomized prospective data has led to a wide range of practice regarding adjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS Patients with high-grade endometrioid, serous endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 were identified from databases in three gynecologic oncology divisions, in Toronto and in Israel. Adjuvant treatment practices differed across the centers, creating a heterogeneous cohort. A comparison of stage I patients stratified by adjuvant treatment was undertaken. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to compare recurrence and survival across treatment groups. RESULTS 490patients with high risk endometrial cancer were identified, among them 213 patients with stage I disease. Israeli patients received more chemotherapy (41% vs 10% in stage I disease; P<0.001) than patients in Toronto. Chemotherapy was not associated with improved disease-free, disease-specific or overall survival, nor was it associated with fewer distant recurrences (50% vs 54%). Radiation was also not associated with improved recurrence or survival, nor did it affect the pattern of recurrence. On Cox multivariable analysis, neither radiation treatment nor chemotherapy were significantly associated with outcome (HR for recurrence, 0.72 for pelvic radiation (P=0.46) and 1.99 for chemotherapy (P=0.09); HR for death, 0.67 for pelvic radiation (P=0.29) and 1.03 for chemotherapy (P=0.94)). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective analysis, neither adjuvant radiation nor chemotherapy were associated with improved outcome in stage I, high risk endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Limor Helpman
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel .,Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Tamar Perri
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Natalie Lavee
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Sarit Kalfon
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Estela Derazne
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mario E Beiner
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Yfat Kadan
- Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Ami Fishman
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Gynecologic Oncology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Jacob Korach
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Gynecologic Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Al Covens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Xiang M, English DP, Kidd EA. National patterns of care and cancer-specific outcomes of adjuvant treatment in patients with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 152:599-604. [PMID: 30551884 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Revised: 12/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate outcomes of adjuvant therapy for serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma, as prior studies are limited by sample size and/or patient heterogeneity. National guidelines permit substantial variations in treatment, suggesting the need for additional data. METHODS Patients with FIGO stages I-III serous or clear cell uterine carcinoma who underwent at least total hysterectomy were identified in SEER-Medicare. Adjuvant external beam radiation, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy were determined using SEER fields and Medicare claims. The primary outcome was death from endometrial cancer (cancer-specific mortality [CSM]) evaluated using Gray's test (univariable analysis, UVA) and Fine-Gray regression (multivariable analysis, MVA). RESULTS A total of 1789 patients (1437 serous, 352 clear cell) were identified. In stages I-II patients (n = 1188), brachytherapy was significant for survival in UVA (P = 0.03) and MVA (P = 0.02). Additionally, in the subset with serous histology (n = 947), chemotherapy was also significant in UVA (P = 0.002) and approached significance in MVA (P = 0.05). The 4-year CSM for stages I-II serous cancers was 25% without brachytherapy or chemotherapy, 15% with one, and 9% with both (P ≤ 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). In stage III patients (n = 601), chemotherapy was significant in UVA (P = 0.002) and MVA (P = 0.006). Most (81%) patients underwent lymph node dissection, which predicted lower CSM in stage III (P = 0.001) but not stages I-II patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest brachytherapy benefits stages I-II serous/clear cell cancers, chemotherapy benefits stage III serous/clear cell cancers, and both chemotherapy and brachytherapy benefit stages I-II serous cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Diana P English
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth A Kidd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Evolving times and paradigms in endometrial cancer: Incorporating and interpreting new data and technologic advances. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151:393-394. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
40
|
Wang Y, Yu M, Yang JX, Cao DY, Shen K, Lang JH. Clinicopathological and survival analysis of uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a single institutional review of 106 cases. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:4915-4928. [PMID: 30464593 PMCID: PMC6208488 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s179566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The objectives of this study were to analyze clinicopathological features and to investigate the prognostic determinants in patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). Materials and methods A cohort of 106 UPSC patients diagnosed and treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis. Differences between categorical data were calculated by using the chi-squared test. Results The median follow-up was 29.0 months (range =2-170 months), with an overall recurrence rate of 35.8%. The coincidence rate between preoperative endometrial sampling and postoperative definitive pathology of hysteroscopy group was significantly higher than that of the dilation and curettage group (88.5% vs 65.0%, P=0.019). Adjuvant therapy-treated patients with stage I UPSC experienced significantly fewer recurrences than those receiving observation (P=0.003). Patients with advanced-stage UPSC who received combination therapy demonstrated a lower risk of local recurrence compared with those who received chemotherapy alone with a borderline significance (P=0.051). Elevated serum cancer antigen 125 level was associated with advanced-stage disease and recurrence (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor stage and optimal cytoreduction were independent predictors of survival. In substage analysis, complete surgical staging was associated with better overall survival (OS; yes vs no, HR: 0.05 [95% CI: 0.01-0.51], P=0.037) in patients with stage I UPSC. As for advanced stage, paclitaxel-platinum chemotherapy regimen and optimal cytoreduction were independent favorable prognostic factors for progression-free survival (paclitaxel-carboplatin [TC] vs other; HR =0.38, P=0.010; yes vs no, HR =0.45, P=0.032) and OS (TC vs other, HR =0.38, P=0.022; yes vs no, HR =0.54, P=0.013). Conclusion In patients with stage I UPSC, complete staging was associated with better OS, and therefore, it should be performed in all patients. Tumor stage and optimal cytoreduction are the most significant prognostic factors. Recurrence can be improved in stage I patients treated with adjuvant therapy and in patients with advanced-stage disease treated with combined therapy. TC regimen may be the preferred regimen for chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Mei Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Jia-Xin Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Dong-Yan Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Keng Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, ;
| | - Jing-He Lang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, ;
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Seino M, Ohta T, Sugiyama A, Sakaki H, Sudo T, Tsutsumi S, Shigeta S, Tokunaga H, Toyoshima M, Yaegashi N, Nagase S. Metabolomic analysis of uterine serous carcinoma with acquired resistance to paclitaxel. Oncotarget 2018; 9:31985-31998. [PMID: 30174791 PMCID: PMC6112827 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is more aggressive than other subtypes of endometrial carcinoma and is associated with a poor prognosis. We analyzed the metabolomic profile of USC with acquired resistance to paclitaxel. RESULTS Glutathione (GSH) concentration in PTX-1 cells was higher than in USPC-1 cells. In addition, GSH concentration in the USPC-1 cells increased after treatment with paclitaxel but was unchanged in PTX-1 cells. Glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) and ribose-5-phosphate (R5P) concentrations in PTX-1 cells were higher than those in USPC-1 cells. G6P concentration in the USPC-1 cells was unchanged after treatment with paclitaxel, while it decreased in PTX-1 cells. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that increased GSH and glucose metabolism may be related to acquiring resistance to paclitaxel in USC and thus may be targets for anti-USC therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We compared metabolic profiles and reactions to paclitaxel in both a wild type USC cell line (USPC-1) and PTX-1, a cell line derived from USPC-1 which acquired paclitaxel resistance, using a capillary electrophoresis CE-MS/MS system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manabu Seino
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Ohta
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Akiko Sugiyama
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Sakaki
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sudo
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Seiji Tsutsumi
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Shogo Shigeta
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Hideki Tokunaga
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Masafumi Toyoshima
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Nobuo Yaegashi
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| | - Satoru Nagase
- 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iidanishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fader AN, Roque DM, Siegel E, Buza N, Hui P, Abdelghany O, Chambers SK, Secord AA, Havrilesky L, O'Malley DM, Backes F, Nevadunsky N, Edraki B, Pikaart D, Lowery W, ElSahwi KS, Celano P, Bellone S, Azodi M, Litkouhi B, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Schwartz PE, Santin AD. Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2/neu. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2044-2051. [PMID: 29584549 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.5966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 308] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Uterine serous carcinoma is a rare, aggressive variant of endometrial cancer. Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu, a receptor overexpressed in 30% of uterine serous carcinoma. This multicenter, randomized phase II trial compared carboplatin-paclitaxel with and without trastuzumab in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine serous carcinoma who overexpress HER2/neu. Methods Eligible patients had primary stage III or IV or recurrent HER2/neu-positive disease. Participants were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin-paclitaxel (control arm) for six cycles with or without intravenous trastuzumab (experimental arm) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which was assessed for differences between treatment arms via one-sided log-rank tests. Results From August 2011 to March 2017, 61 patients were randomly assigned. Forty progression-free survival-related events occurred among 58 evaluable participants. Among all patients, median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (control) versus 12.6 months (experimental; P = .005; hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 90% CI, 0.26 to 0.76). Similarly, median progression-free survival was 9.3 (control) versus 17.9 (experimental) months among 41 patients with stage III or IV disease undergoing primary treatment ( P = .013; HR, 0.40; 90% CI, 0.20 to 0.80) and 6.0 (control) versus 9.2 months (experimental), respectively, among 17 patients with recurrent disease ( P = .003; HR, 0.14; 90% CI, 0.04 to 0.53). Toxicity was not different between treatment arms, and no unexpected safety signals emerged. Conclusion Addition of trastuzumab to carboplatin-paclitaxel was well tolerated and increased progression-free survival. These encouraging results deserve further investigation to determine their impact on overall survival in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine serous carcinoma who overexpress HER2/neu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda N Fader
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Dana M Roque
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Eric Siegel
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Natalia Buza
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Pei Hui
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Osama Abdelghany
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Setsuko K Chambers
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Laura Havrilesky
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - David M O'Malley
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Floor Backes
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Nicole Nevadunsky
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Babak Edraki
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Dirk Pikaart
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - William Lowery
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Karim S ElSahwi
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Paul Celano
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Stefania Bellone
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Masoud Azodi
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Babak Litkouhi
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Elena Ratner
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Dan-Arin Silasi
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Peter E Schwartz
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| | - Alessandro D Santin
- Amanda N. Fader, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Dana M. Roque, University of Maryland; Paul Celano, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore; William Lowery, Walter Reed Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Eric Siegel, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; Natalia Buza, Pei Hui, Osama Abdelghany, Stefania Bellone, Masoud Azodi, Babak Litkouhi, Elena Ratner, Dan-Arin Silasi, Peter E. Schwartz, and Alessandro D. Santin, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Setsuko K. Chambers, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Angeles Alvarez Secord and Laura Havrilesky, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; David M. O'Malley and Floor Backes, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Nicole Nevadunsky, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Babak Edraki, John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA; Dirk Pikaart, Penrose Cancer Center-St Francis, Colorado Springs, CO; and Karim S. ElSahwi, Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The role of adjuvant therapy in stage IA serous and clear cell uterine cancer: A multi-institutional pooled analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:283-290. [PMID: 29544706 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As the optimal adjuvant management of stage IA serous or clear cell endometrial cancer is controversial, a multi-institutional review was conducted with the objective of evaluating the appropriateness of various strategies including observation. METHODS Retrospective chart reviews for 414 consecutive patients who underwent hysterectomy for FIGO stage IA endometrial cancer with serous, clear cell or mixed histology between 2004 and 2015 were conducted in 6 North American centers. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank test, univariable and multivariable cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS Post-operative management included observation (50%), chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) (27%), RT only (16%) and chemotherapy only (7%). The 178 RT patients received external beam (EBRT, 16%), vaginal vault brachytherapy (VVB, 56%) or both (28%). Among patients without any adjuvant treatment, 5-year local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 82% (95% confidence interval: 74-88), 70% (62-78) and 90% (82-94), respectively. CSS in patients without adjuvant treatment was improved with adequate surgical staging (100% vs. 87% (77-92), log-rank p=0.022). Adjuvant VVB was associated with improved LC (5-year 96% (91-99) vs. 84% (76-89), log-rank p=0.007) and DFS (5-year 79% (66-88) vs. 71% (63-77), log-rank p=0.033). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better LC (5-year 96% (90-98) vs. 84% (77-89), log-rank p=0.014) and DFS (5-year 84% (74-91) vs. 69% (61-76), log-rank p=0.009). On multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy and VVB were associated with improved LC while adjuvant chemotherapy and age were significant for DFS. CONCLUSIONS In stage IA serous or clear cell uterine cancer, adjuvant RT and chemotherapy were associated with better LC and DFS. Observation may be appropriate in patients who have had adequate surgical staging.
Collapse
|
44
|
Tate K, Yoshida H, Ishikawa M, Uehara T, Ikeda SI, Hiraoka N, Kato T. Prognostic factors for patients with early-stage uterine serous carcinoma without adjuvant therapy. J Gynecol Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29533019 PMCID: PMC5920218 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is an aggressive type 2 endometrial cancer. Data on prognostic factors for patients with early-stage USC without adjuvant therapy are limited. This study aims to assess the baseline recurrence risk of early-stage USC patients without adjuvant treatment and to identify prognostic factors and patients who need adjuvant therapy. Methods Sixty-eight patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–II USC between 1997 and 2016 were included. All the cases did not undergo adjuvant treatment as institutional practice. Clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes were analyzed to determine prognostic factors. Results FIGO stages IA, IB, and II were observed in 42, 7, and 19 cases, respectively. Median follow-up time was 60 months. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all cases were 73.9% and 78.0%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, cervical stromal involvement and positive pelvic cytology were significant predictors of DFS and OS, and ≥1/2 myometrial invasion was also a significant predictor of OS. Of 68 patients, 38 patients had no cervical stromal invasion or positive pelvic cytology and showed 88.8% 5-year DFS and 93.6% 5-year OS. Conclusion Cervical stromal invasion and positive pelvic cytology are prognostic factors for stage I–II USC. Patients with stage IA or IB USC showing negative pelvic cytology may have an extremely favorable prognosis and need not receive any adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisei Tate
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuya Ishikawa
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Uehara
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun Ichi Ikeda
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to determine the role of omental sampling in staging of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and to evaluate its impact on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study of 106 women with USC who underwent primary surgery between 2005 and 2014 was done. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and progression and recurrence patterns were studied in 84 patients with follow-up over 1 year. Diagnostic characteristics were evaluated for preoperative imaging and operative findings. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for omental metastasis. Survival curves were used to compare omental sampling status and the presence of omental metastasis. RESULTS Of the 106 patients, 66 underwent surgical staging with omental biopsy (54; 82%) or omentectomy (12, 18%). Eight (12%) patients had metastatic disease in the omental samplings. All 6 patients with macrometastasis had visible lesions or palpable nodules and preoperative computed tomography (CT) was suspicious in 3. In 2 (3%) patients, omentum was not suspicious on CT or intraoperatively but had micrometastases. The negative predictive value regarding the staging CT scan was 92% and of the operative findings was 97%. On multivariate analysis, no variable was associated with omental involvement. Disease progressed or recurred in 40 (48%) patients. The most frequent sites of recurrence or progression were the omentum (23; 27%), peritoneum (26; 31%), pelvis (15, 18%), lung (15, 18%), and liver (12, 14%). Comparing the groups with or without omental assessment, no significant difference was found regarding progression and recurrence patterns, overall survival, and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Omental involvement in USC upstages patients to stage IV disease and traditional risk factors fail to predict extrauterine disease. Although omental sampling does not influence disease progression or survival, a comprehensive intraoperative evaluation of the omentum is advised as most cases have grossly visible lesions.
Collapse
|
46
|
Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Intermediate-/High-Risk Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in an Australian Cohort. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:1379-1386. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe role of lymphadenectomy (LND) in early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. Previous studies have included low-risk patients and nonendometrioid histologies for which LND may not be beneficial, whereas long-term morbidity after LND is unclear. In a large Australian cohort of women with clinical early-stage intermediate-/high-risk endometrioid EC, we analyzed the association of LND with clinicopathological characteristics, adjuvant treatment, survival, patterns of disease recurrence, and morbidity.Materials and MethodsFrom a larger prospective study (Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study), we analyzed data from 328 women with stage IA grade 3 (n = 63), stage IB grade 1 to 3 (n = 160), stage II grade 1 to 3 (n = 71), and stage IIIC1/2 grade 1 to 3 (n = 31/3) endometrioid EC. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The association of LND with OS was assessed using Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, stage, grade, and adjuvant treatment. The association with risk of recurrent disease was analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for age, stage, and grade. Morbidity data were analyzed using χ2 tests.ResultsMedian follow-up was 45.8 months. Overall survival at 3 years was 93%. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 217 women (66%), 16% of this group having positive nodes. Median node count was 12. There were no significant differences in OS between LND and no LND groups, or by number of nodes removed. After excluding stage IB grade 1/2 tumors, there was no association between LND and OS among a “high-risk” group of 190 women with a positive node rate of 24%. However, a similar cohort (n = 71) of serous EC in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study had improved survival after LND. Women who underwent LND had significantly higher rates of critical events (5% vs 0%, P = 0.02) and lymphoedema (23% vs 4%, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsIn this cohort with early-stage intermediate-/high-risk endometrioid EC, LND did not improve survival but was associated with significantly increased morbidity.
Collapse
|
47
|
Trends in Survival of Patients With Uterine Serous Carcinoma From 1988 to 2011: A Population-Based Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:1155-1164. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveOur study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database to determine if the changes in treatment paradigm observed over the last 2 decades have improved outcomes in patients with uterine serous carcinoma (USC).MethodsWomen with USC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database from 1988 to 2011 (n = 8230) and grouped into 3 cohorts (1988–1997, 1998–2004, and 2005–2011). Disease-specific survival and overall survival were estimated. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used.ResultsDisease-specific survival (59 vs 94 months vs not reached;P< 0.001) and overall survival (31 vs 37 vs 45 months;P< 0.001) improved over time. In univariable analyses, only those with stage I–III and those who reside in the Western or Central regions were noted to have improvement over time. In multivariable analyses when adjusting for age, race, marital status, stage, geographic location, cancer-related surgery, extent of lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant radiation, patients who received the diagnosis during 2005 to 2011 were 22% less likely to die of uterine cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.87;P< 0.001) and 17% less likely to die of any cause (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76–0.90;P< 0.0001) compared with patients who received a diagnosis during 1988–1997. Similarly, patients who received a diagnosis during 1998–2004 were 15% less likely to die of uterine cancer (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77–0.94;P= 0.0015) and 10% less likely to die of any cause (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83–0.97;P= 0.0048) compared with patients who received a diagnosis during 1988–1997.ConclusionsChanges in treatment trends for USC over the last 2 decades have resulted in an improvement in outcome especially those with stage I–III disease.
Collapse
|
48
|
Modh A, Burmeister C, Munkarah AR, Elshaikh MA. External pelvic and vaginal irradiation vs. vaginal irradiation alone as postoperative therapy in women with early stage uterine serous carcinoma: Results of a National Cancer Database analysis. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:841-846. [PMID: 28511891 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.04.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant treatment in early stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC) usually consists of chemotherapy with vaginal brachytherapy (VB), pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or combination. We compared survival outcomes across these various radiation treatment modalities using the National Cancer Database. METHODS AND MATERIALS The National Cancer Database was queried for adult females with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1988 Stage I-II USC diagnosed from 2003 to 2013 treated definitively with hysterectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. χ2 tests were used to assess differences by radiation type (VB, pelvic EBRT, and EBRT + VB) and various clinical variables. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods were used to evaluate survival outcomes. Risk factors related to overall survival were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS We identified 1336 patients with USC who met our inclusion criteria. Most patients were treated with VB (66%) compared with EBRT (21%) or combination EBRT + VB (13%). The proportion of patients who received EBRT (including EBRT + VB) was higher for those who did not have a lymph node dissection or with fewer dissected lymph nodes. Patients treated with VB alone had longer 5-year survival rates (84% [95% confidence interval: 80, 90]) than those treated with EBRT (75% [95% confidence interval: 69, 80]) (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (hazard ratio, 2.48; p < 0.001) and the absence of a lymph node dissection (hazard ratio, 2.24; p = 0.047) were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS This large hospital-based study suggests that VB alone may be sufficient for adjuvant radiation treatment in women with USC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and who underwent an adequate surgical staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Modh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | | - Adnan R Munkarah
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women's Health Services, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Impact of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy on Management of Early Stage Clear Cell and Papillary Serous Carcinoma of the Uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:720-729. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to assess interaction of lymph node dissection (LND), adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), and radiotherapy (RT) in stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCC).Methods/MaterialsThe National Cancer Data Base was queried for women diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I UPSC and UCC from 1998 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) was estimated for combinations of RT and CT by the Kaplan-Meier method stratified by histology and LND. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were generated.ResultsUterine papillary serous carcinoma: 5432 women with UPSC were identified. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma had the highest 5-year OS with CT + RT with (83%) or without LND (76%). On multivariate analyses, CT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.77; P = 0.01] and vaginal cuff brachytherapy (HR, 0.68; P = 0.003) with LND were independently associated with OS. Without LND, vaginal cuff brachytherapy (HR, 0.53; P = 0.03), but not CT (HR, 1.21; P = 0.92), was associated with OS. Uterine clear cell carcinoma: 2516 women with UCC were identified. Uterine clear cell carcinoma with and without LND had comparable 5-year OS for all combinations of CT and RT on univariate and multivariate analyses.ConclusionsIn stage I papillary serous uterine cancer, brachytherapy and CT were associated with increased survival; however, the benefit of chemotherapy was limited to those with surgical staging. In contrast, no adjuvant therapy was associated with survival in stage I uterine clear cell carcinoma, and further investigation to identify more effective therapies is warranted.
Collapse
|
50
|
Holman LL, Pal N, Iglesias DA, Soliman PT, Balakrishnan N, Klopp A, Broaddus RR, Fleming ND, Munsell MF, Lu KH, Westin SN. Factors prognostic of survival in advanced-stage uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146:27-33. [PMID: 28465008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Revised: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study objective was to analyze the impact of prognostic factors, including treatment modality, on outcome in patients with advanced-stage uterine serous carcinoma (USC). METHODS A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV USC between 1993 and 2012 was performed. Summary statistics were used to describe demographic and clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the association of potential prognostic factors with OS and RFS. RESULTS The study included 260 patients with median follow-up of 26.6months (range 1-172.8). Median age was 63years (range 30-88) and 52.3% had stage III disease. In all, 60% were treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy, 18.1% received surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, 11.5% had surgery and radiotherapy, and 10.4% had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The overall complete response rate was 68.9%, and the cumulative incidence of recurrence was 82.7%. Treatment that included surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation and stage III disease were associated with improved RFS on multivariate analysis. For OS, therapy with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, mixed histology, and stage III disease were associated with better OS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced-stage USC have a poor prognosis, regardless of clinical factors or treatment received. However, combination therapy that includes chemotherapy and radiation appears to be associated with improved survival in these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Holman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Navdeep Pal
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David A Iglesias
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nyla Balakrishnan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nicole D Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mark F Munsell
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|