Techniques and predictive models to improve prostate cancer detection

Multiplexed Prostate Cancer Companion Diagnostic Devices

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most prominent forms of cancer for men. Since the early 1990s, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) has been a commonly recognized PCa-associated protein biomarker. However, PSA testing has been shown to lack in specificity and sensitivity when needed to diagnose, monitor and/or treat PCa patients successfully. One enhancement could include the simultaneous detection of multiple PCa-associated protein biomarkers alongside PSA, also known as multiplexing. If conventional methods such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are used, multiplexed detection of such protein biomarkers can result in an increase in the required sample volume, in the complexity of the analytical procedures, and in adding to the cost. Using companion diagnostic devices such as biosensors, which can be portable and cost-effective with multiplexing capacities, may address these limitations. This review explores recent research for multiplexed PCa protein biomarker detection using optical and electrochemical biosensor platforms. Some of the novel and potential serum-based PCa protein biomarkers will be discussed in this review. In addition, this review discusses the importance of converting research protocols into multiplex point-of-care testing (xPOCT) devices to be used in near-patient settings, providing a more personalized approach to PCa patients’ diagnostic, surveillance and treatment management.

Prediction models for prostate cancer to be used in the primary care setting: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk prediction models for prostate cancer (PCa) that can be used in the primary care and community health settings.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and Embase databases combined from inception and up to the end of January 2019.

ELIGIBILITY

Studies were included based on satisfying all the following criteria: (i) presenting an evaluation of PCa risk at initial biopsy in patients with no history of PCa, (ii) studies not incorporating an invasive clinical assessment or expensive biomarker/genetic tests, (iii) inclusion of at least two variables with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) being one of them, and (iv) studies reporting a measure of predictive performance. The quality of the studies and risk of bias was assessed by using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Relevant information extracted for each model included: the year of publication, source of data, type of model, number of patients, country, age, PSA range, mean/median PSA, other variables included in the model, number of biopsy cores to assess outcomes, study endpoint(s), cancer detection, model validation and model performance.

RESULTS

An initial search yielded 109 potential studies, of which five met the set criteria. Four studies were cohort-based and one was a case-control study. PCa detection rate was between 20.6% and 55.8%. Area under the curve (AUC) was reported in four studies and ranged from 0.65 to 0.75. All models showed significant improvement in predicting PCa compared with being based on PSA alone. The difference in AUC between extended models and PSA alone was between 0.06 and 0.21.

CONCLUSION

Only a few PCa risk prediction models have the potential to be readily used in the primary healthcare or community health setting. Further studies are needed to investigate other potential variables that could be integrated into models to improve their clinical utility for PCa testing in a community setting.

Integrated predictive model for prostatic cancer using clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data

OBJECTIVE

to develop a predictive model to estimate the probability of prostate cancer prior to biopsy.

METHODS

from September 2009 to January 2014, 445 men underwent prostate biopsy in a radiology service. We excluded from the study patients with diseases that could compromise the data analysis, who had undergone prostatic resection or used 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Thus, we selected 412 patients. Variables included in the model were age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, prostate volume and abnormal sonographic findings. We constructed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curve, as well as the model's Positive Predictive Value (PPV) .

RESULTS

of the 412 men, 155 (37.62%) had prostate cancer (PC). The mean age was 63.8 years and the median PSA was 7.22ng/ml. In addition, 21.6% and 20.6% of patients had abnormalities on digital rectal examination and image suggestive of cancer by ultrasound, respectively. The median prostate volume and PSA density were 45.15cm3 and 0.15ng/ml/cm3, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only five studied risk factors are predictors of PC in the study (p<0.05). The PSA density was excluded from the model (p=0.314). The area under the ROC curve for PC prediction was 0.86. The PPV was 48.08% for 95%sensitivity and 52.37% for 90% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

the results indicate that clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data, besides easily obtained, can better stratify the risk of patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

Outcome assessment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma under systemic therapy using artificial neural networks

BACKGROUND

The outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) under systemic therapy shows remarkable variability, and there is a need to identify prognostic parameters that allow individual prognostic stratification and selection of optimal therapy. Artificial neural networks (ANN) are software systems that can be trained to recognize complex data patterns. In this study, we used ANNs to identify poor prognosis of patients with RCC based on common clinical parameters available at the beginning of systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from patients with RCC who started systemic therapy were collected prospectively in a single center database; 175 data sets with follow-up data (median, 36 months) were available for analysis. Age, sex, body mass index, performance status, histopathologic parameters, time interval between primary tumor and detection of metastases, type of systemic therapy, number of metastases, and metastatic sites were used as input data for the ANN. The target variable was overall survival after 36 months. Logistic regression models were constructed by using the same variables.

RESULTS

Death after 36 months occurred in 26% of the patients in the tyrosine kinase inhibitors group and in 37% of the patients in the immunotherapy group (P = .22). ANN achieved 95% overall accuracy and significantly outperformed logistic regression models (78% accuracy). Pathologic T classification, invasion of vessels, and tumor grade had the highest impact on the network's decision.

CONCLUSION

ANN is a promising approach for individual risk stratification of patients with advanced RCC under systemic therapy, based on clinical parameters, and can help to optimize the therapeutic strategy.

Subjective well-being as a determinant of individuals' responses to symptoms: a biopsychosocial perspective

BACKGROUND

Although many models have been developed to explain health behaviour, differences in individual response to symptoms remain largely unexplained; moreover, they tend to underestimate affective (i.e., emotional) processes and they neglect the construct of well-being, despite its predominant role in the definition of health.

AIM

The development of a novel conceptual framework to explain and predict variability in individuals' responses to symptoms, through a bio-psychosocial perspective, considering also the potential role of subjective well-being.

MATERIALS & METHODS

The most widely used health behaviour models were being reviewed, as well as their limitations. Based on the evidence in the literature, major domains that influence response to symptoms are identified and analysed.

RESULTS

A new conceptual framework that is not limited to explanation of common health behaviours such as treatment seeking or problem identification, but draws attention to a broad spectrum of individual reactions and experiences following the physical experience of a symptom or medical condition. The role of subjective well-being and its determinants are considered as a central concept in the proposed framework.

DISCUSSION

The present conceptual framework provides a comprehensive bio-psychosocial perspective on behavioural outcomes related to individual response to symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The proposed framework opens a new window to patient centred care. Research to evaluate the proposed framework may improve the quality of clinical care and overall patient satisfaction.