Primary systemic chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer

Regressed Seminoma with Metastases to the Jejunum and Retroperitoneum

A 66-year-old man with vomiting and weight loss was referred to our hospital. Abdominal computed tomography showed small bowel obstruction caused by a presumed small intestinal tumor. Single-balloon endoscopy showed an ulcerated tumor and marked stenosis of the jejunum. Immunohistochemical staining suggested the tumor to be poorly differentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma. The patient underwent open surgical resection of the jejunal tumor and regional lymph nodes both to improve the quality of life of the patient and to possibly get a cure of the presumed jejunal carcinoma. Pathological examination of the excised tumor and lymph nodes including para-aortic lymph nodes showed large-sized tumor cells and massive lymphocyte infiltrates. Immunostaining showed the tumor cells to be OCT3/4, AE1/AE3, CD117, and D2-40 positive, leading to the diagnosis of metastatic seminoma. With the preoperative diagnosis of a presumed burned-out tumor of the testis, the patient underwent left high orchiectomy. Pathological examination of the left testis showed marked scar tissue, no teratoma elements, and no residual tumor cells. Under the final diagnosis of regressed seminoma, the patient has received combination chemotherapy using bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical oncologists should take regressed seminoma into their differential diagnosis when the biopsy specimens of the presumed intestinal malignancy show poorly differentiated or undifferentiated atypical cells with massive lymphocyte infiltrates, especially in postpubertal men. Confirmation of a malignant noninvasive component should be another important clue to the appropriate differential diagnosis when choosing between metastatic seminoma and poorly differentiated or undifferentiated intestinal primary malignancies.

A phase I/II trial of epirubicin and docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) on 2-weekly or 3-weekly schedules: NCIC CTG MA.22

This phase I/II neoadjuvant trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00066443) determined maximally-tolerated doses (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, response-to-therapy, and explored the role of novel response biomarkers. MA.22 accrued T3N0, any N2 or N3, and T4 breast cancer patients. Treatment was 6 cycles of 3-weekly (Schedule A; N = 47) or 8 cycles of 2-weekly (Schedule B; N = 46) epirubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy in sequential phase I/II studies, with growth factor support. In phase I of each schedule, MTDs were based on DLT. In phase II, clinical responses (CR/PR) and pathologic complete responses (pCR) were assessed. Tumor biopsy cores were obtained pre-, mid-, and post-treatment: 3 for pathologic assessment; 3 for microarray studies. DLT for Schedule A was febrile neutropenia at 105 mg/m² epirubicin and 75 mg/m² docetaxel; for schedule B, it was fatigue at 75 mg/m² for both agents. Phase II doses were 90 mg/m² epirubicin/75 mg/m² docetaxel for Schedule A and 60 mg/m² (both agents) for Schedule B. Schedule A CR/PR and pCR rates were 90 and 10 %, with large reductions in tumor RNA content and integrity following treatment; Schedule B results were 93 and 0 %, with smaller reductions in RNA quality. Pre-treatment expression of several genes was associated with clinical response, including those within a likely amplicon at 17q12 (ERBB2, TCAP, GSDMB, and PNMT). The combination regimens had acceptable toxicity, good clinical response, induction of changes in tumor RNA content and integrity. Pre-treatment expression of particular genes was associated with clinical responses, including several near 17q12, which with ERBB2, may better identify chemoresponsiveness.

Nanodrug Formed by Coassembly of Dual Anticancer Drugs to Inhibit Cancer Cell Drug Resistance

Carrier-free pure nanodrugs (PNDs) that are composed entirely of pharmaceutically active molecules are regarded as promising candidates to be the next generation of drug formulations and are mainly formulated from supramolecular self-assembly of drug molecules. It benefits from the efficient use of drug compounds with poor aqueous solubility and takes advantage of nanoscale drug delivery systems. Here, a type of all-in-one nanoparticle consisting of multiple drugs with enhanced synergistic antiproliferation efficiency against drug-resistant cancer cells has been created. To nanoparticulate the anticancer drugs, 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) and doxorubicin (DOX) were chosen as a typical model. The resulting HD nanoparticles (HD NPs) were formulated by a "green" and convenient self-assembling method, and the water-solubility of 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) was improved 50-fold after nanosizing by coassembly with DOX. The formation process was studied by observing the morphological changes at various reaction times and molar ratios of DOX to HCPT. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations showed that DOX molecules tend to assemble around HCPT molecules through intermolecular forces. With the advantage of nanosizing, HD NPs could improve the intracellular drug retention of DOX to as much as 2-fold in drug-resistant cancer cells (MCF-7R). As a dual-drug-loaded nanoformulation, HD NPs effectively enhanced drug cytotoxicity to drug-resistant cancer cells. The combination of HCPT and DOX exhibited a synergistic effect as the nanosized HD NPs improved drug retention in drug-resistant cancer cells against P-gp efflux in MCF-7R cells. Furthermore, colony forming assays were applied to evaluate long-term inhibition of cancer cell proliferation, and these assays confirmed the greatly improved cytotoxicity of HD NPs in drug-resistant cells compared to free drugs.

Tumor RNA disruption predicts survival benefit from breast cancer chemotherapy

In a prior substudy of the CAN-NCIC-MA.22 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00066443), we observed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduced tumor RNA integrity in breast cancer patients, a phenomenon we term "RNA disruption." The purpose of the current study was to assess in the full patient cohort the relationship between mid-treatment tumor RNA disruption and both pCR post-treatment and, subsequently, disease-free survival (DFS) up to 108 months post-treatment. To meet these objectives, we developed the RNA disruption assay (RDA) to quantify RNA disruption and stratify it into 3 response zones of clinical importance. Zone 1 is a level of RNA disruption inadequate for pathologic complete response (pCR); Zone 2 is an intermediate level, while Zone 3 has high RNA disruption. The same RNA disruption cut points developed for pCR response were then utilized for DFS. Tumor RDA identified >fourfold more chemotherapy non-responders than did clinical response by calipers. pCR responders were clustered in RDA Zone 3, irrespective of tumor subtype. DFS was about 2-fold greater for patients with tumors in Zone 3 compared to Zone 1 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves corroborated these findings that high tumor RNA disruption was associated with increased DFS. DFS values for patients in zone 3 that did not achieve a pCR were similar to that of pCR recipients across tumor subtypes, including patients with hormone receptor positive tumors that seldom achieve a pCR. RDA appears superior to pCR as a chemotherapy response biomarker, supporting the prospect of its use in response-guided chemotherapy.

Mithramycin A sensitizes therapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells toward genotoxic drug doxorubicin

Chemotherapy resistance is a major clinical challenge for the management of locally advanced breast cancer. Accumulating evidence suggests a major role of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in chemoresistance evoking the requirement of drugs that selectively target CSCs in combination with chemotherapy. Here, we report that mithramycin A, a known specificity protein (Sp)1 inhibitor, sensitizes breast CSCs (bCSCs) by perturbing the expression of drug efflux transporters, ATP-binding cassette sub-family G, member 2 (ABCG2) and ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 1 (ABCC1), survival factors, B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP), and, stemness regulators, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4) and Nanog, which are inherently upregulated in these cells compared with the rest of the tumor population. In-depth analysis revealed that aberrant overexpression of Sp1 in bCSCs transcriptionally upregulates (1) resistance-promoting genes to protect these cells from genotoxic therapy, and (2) stemness regulators to sustain self-renewal potential of these cells. However, mithramycin A causes transcriptional suppression of these chemoresistant and self-renewal genes by inhibiting Sp1 recruitment to their promoters. Under such antisurvival microenvironment, chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin induces apoptosis in bCSCs via DNA damage-induced reactive oxygen species generation. Cumulatively, our findings raise the possibility that mithramycin A might emerge as a promising drug in combinatorial therapy with the existing chemotherapeutic agents that fail to eliminate CSCs. This will consequently lead to the improvement of therapeutic outcome for the treatment-resistant breast carcinomas.

Gemifloxacin inhibits migration and invasion and induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition in human breast adenocarcinoma cells

Gemifloxacin (GMF) is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic that inhibits bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-metastatic activities of GMF and its possible mechanisms of action, with a special focus on the induction of mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET). The human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 were used to assess the anti-metastatic activity of GMF on cell migration and invasion and in scratch wound-healing assays. The effects of GMF on the MET and its regulatory nuclear factor κB (NF-κB)/Snail pathway were assessed. The in vivo anti-metastatic effect of GMF was also evaluated in an animal model. This study demonstrated that GMF inhibited the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-453 cells and induced the MET. GMF suppressed the activation of NF-κB, as well as the cell migration and invasion induced by tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α). GMF was shown to inhibit the phosphorylation of the inhibitor of κB (IκB) and the translocation of NF-κB/Snail in both cancer cell lines. This study showed that the Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP), an inhibitor of IκB kinase, is upregulated after GMF treatment. Inhibition of RKIP by small hairpin RNA transfection significantly decreased the inhibitory effect of GMF on the NF-κB/Snail pathway and also inhibited cell migration and invasion. Overexpression of Snail suppressed GMF-mediated metastasis inhibition and E-cadherin upregulation. An animal model revealed that GMF effectively inhibits lipopolysaccharide-mediated metastasis in mice. This study has demonstrated that GMF might be a novel anticancer agent for the prevention and treatment of metastasis in breast cancer.

KEY MESSAGES

GMF inhibits the migration and invasion of human breast adenocarcinoma cells. GMF induces MET by reducing NF-κB and Snail activation and by increasing RKIP levels. GMF has potential clinical implication as an anti-metastatic agent for breast cancer.

Targeted inhibition of Hsp90 by ganetespib is effective across a broad spectrum of breast cancer subtypes

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a molecular chaperone essential for the stability and function of multiple cellular client proteins, a number of which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Here we undertook a comprehensive evaluation of the activity of ganetespib, a selective Hsp90 inhibitor, in this malignancy. With low nanomolar potency, ganetespib reduced cell viability in a panel of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-overexpressing, triple-negative and inflammatory breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Ganetespib treatment induced a rapid and sustained destabilization of multiple client proteins and oncogenic signaling pathways and even brief exposure was sufficient to induce and maintain suppression of HER2 levels in cells driven by this receptor. Indeed, HER2-overexpressing BT-474 cells were comparatively more sensitive to ganetespib than the dual HER2/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib in three-dimensional culture. Ganetespib exposure caused pleiotropic effects in the inflammatory breast cancer line SUM149, including receptor tyrosine kinases, MAPK, AKT and mTOR signaling, transcription factors and proteins involved in cell cycle, stress and apoptotic regulation, as well as providing combinatorial benefit with lapatinib in these cells. This multimodal activity translated to potent antitumor efficacy in vivo, suppressing tumor growth in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 xenografts and inducing tumor regression in the BT-474 model. Thus, ganetespib potently inhibits Hsp90 leading to the degradation of multiple clinically-validated oncogenic client proteins in breast cancer cells, encompassing the broad spectrum of molecularly-defined subtypes. This preclinical activity profile suggests that ganetespib may offer considerable promise as a new therapeutic candidate for patients with advanced breast cancers.

[Clinical and outcome characteristics of inflammatory breast cancers in Brazzaville]

T4 breast cancers are a heterogeneous group. We conducted this study to analyze the differences between inflammatory and non-inflammatory T4 breast cancers. In a cross-sectional descriptive study over a period ranging from 2007 to 2010, we collected patients with T4 breast cancer. These patients were divided into two groups: a group of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and a group of breast cancer T4 non inflammatory (NIBC). We compared the epidemiological, clinical and outcome characteristics of the two groups. We identified 129 patients with T4 stage out of 343 patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer. Fifty-two IBC and 77 NIBC patients were observed. We did not found any epidemiological difference between the two groups. The two entities differed in tumor size (greater in the IBC group) and skin ulceration (less frequently found in the NIBC group). The only independent prognostic factor for failure of first line chemotherapy was, for both groups, non-compliance treatment intervals. The median overall survival in our study was 9 months in the IBC versus 13 months in the NIBC (p = 0.01, Log-rank test) patients. By multivariate analysis, IBC was the only independent prognostic factor negatively influencing the survival. IBC is a frequent entity in Brazzaville, Congo and displays a poor-prognosis.

Neoadjuvant Therapy - What Have We Achieved in the Last 20 Years?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with large, inoperable tumors or inflammatory breast cancer, but it is also increasingly considered for women with operable disease. Several randomized trials have demonstrated that anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimens in operable breast cancer were equally effective in terms of disease-free or overall survival regardless of whether they were administered postoperatively or preoperatively. Further neoadjuvant treatment allows for a higher rate of breast conserving surgery. Tumor responses in terms of pathologic complete remission after short-term chemotherapy will probably only serve as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome in some molecular breast cancer subtypes like the triple-negative, HER2-positive, and some luminal B subsets. Recent trials showed that in HER2-positive disease pCR rates were as high as 70% when 2 HER2-targeted agents were added to chemotherapy.

[Chemotherapy for early breast cancer: practices in 2010]

The management of breast cancer has changed at both surgery levels, with the development of sentinel node, and at the medical level with the use of new therapies. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and each patient should be offered an adapted treatment in an effort to reduce the risk of relapse and death, with the minimal toxicities. The micrometastatic disease appears early in the history of the tumor and chemotherapy aims to eradicate it. In this review, we describe the state of practice regarding adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium

Despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy in recent years, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue. Biological characteristics and clinical behavior varies widely, ranging from indolent to locally aggressive or generalized disease. In depth knowledge of biology of cancer progression and cancer could lead to the identification of tumor characteristics associated with outcome. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) integrated into a multimodality program is nowadays the established treatment in LABC. Although our efforts in this research task are ongoing, of special clinical interest is the integration of anti-HER2 and other biological therapies, as anti-angiogenesis targeted treatments, that may further improve the long term control of LABC. Clinical management of LABC could be modified based on molecular biology and an approach tailored to each patient will optimize therapy.