Insurance status and survival disparities among nonelderly rectal cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base

Effects of Medicaid managed care on early detection of cancer: Evidence from mandatory Medicaid managed care program in Pennsylvania

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in late- versus early-stage diagnosis of cancer associated with the introduction of mandatory Medicaid managed care (MMC) in Pennsylvania.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We analyzed data from the Pennsylvania cancer registry (2010-2018) for adult Medicaid beneficiaries aged 21-64 newly diagnosed with a solid tumor. To ascertain Medicaid and managed care status around diagnosis, we linked the cancer registry to statewide hospital-based facility records collected by an independent state agency (Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council).

STUDY DESIGN

We leveraged a natural experiment arising from county-level variation in mandatory MMC in Pennsylvania. Using a stacked difference-in-differences design, we compared changes in the probability of late-stage cancer diagnosis among those residing in counties that newly transitioned to mandatory managed care to contemporaneous changes among those in counties with mature MMC programs.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

N/A.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Mandatory MMC was associated with a reduced probability of late-stage cancer diagnosis (-3.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -7.2, -0.5; p = 0.02), particularly for screening-amenable cancers (-5.5 percentage points; 95% CI: -10.4, -0.6; p = 0.03). We found no significant changes in late-stage diagnosis among non-screening amenable cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

In Pennsylvania, the implementation of mandatory MMC for adult Medicaid beneficiaries was associated with earlier stage of diagnosis among newly diagnosed cancer patients with Medicaid, especially those diagnosed with screening-amenable cancers. Considering that over half of the sample was diagnosed with late-stage cancer even after the transition to mandatory MMC, Medicaid programs and managed care organizations should continue to carefully monitor receipt of cancer screening and design strategies to reduce barriers to guideline-concordant screening or diagnostic procedures.

Rectal Cancer Survival for Residual Carcinoma In Situ Versus Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with improved survival. It is unclear whether residual carcinoma in situ portends a similar outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and achieved pathologic carcinoma in situ versus pathologic complete response.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

National public database.

PATIENTS

A total of 4594 patients in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2016 with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy, underwent surgery, and had node-negative ypTis or ypT0 on final pathology were included. Of these, 4321 patients (94.1%) had ypT0 and 273 (5.9%) had ypTis on final pathology.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Overall survival.

RESULTS

The median age was 60 years, and 1822 patients (39.7%) were women. On initial staging, 54.5% (n = 2503) had stage II disease and 45.5% (n = 2091) had stage III disease. The ypTis group had decreased overall survival compared to the ypT0 group (HR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.95; p  = 0.028). Other factors associated with decreased overall survival were older age at diagnosis, increasing Charlson-Deyo score, and poorly differentiated tumor grade. Variables associated with improved survival were female sex, private insurance, and receipt of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the total cohort, there was no difference in survival between clinical stage II and stage III.

LIMITATIONS

Standard therapy versus total neoadjuvant therapy could not be abstracted. Overall survival was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause or last contact, allowing for some erroneously misclassified deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

ypTis is associated with worse overall survival than ypT0 for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. For this cohort, clinical stage was not a significant predictor of survival. Prospective trials comparing survival for these pathologic outcomes are needed. See Video Abstract .

SUPERVIVENCIA DEL CNCER DE RECTO PARA EL CARCINOMA RESIDUAL IN SITU VS RESPUESTA PATOLGICA COMPLETA DESPUS DE LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE

ANTECEDENTESLa respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer de recto se asocia con una mayor supervivencia. No está claro si el carcinoma residual in situ presagia un resultado similar.OBJETIVOComparar la supervivencia de pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y lograron un carcinoma patológico in situ versus una respuesta patológica completa.DISEÑOEstudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIOBase de datos pública nacional.PACIENTESSe incluyeron 4,594 pacientes de la Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer de 2006 a 2016 con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante, fueron sometidos a cirugía y tuvieron ganglios negativos, ypTis o ypT0 en el reporte patológico final. 4.321 (94,1%) tuvieron ypT0 y 273 (5,9%) tuvieron ypTis en el reporte final.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOSupervivencia general.RESULTADOSLa mediana de edad fue de 60 años. 1.822 pacientes (39,7%) fueron mujeres. El 54,5% (n = 2.503) tuvo la enfermedad en estadio II y el 45,5% (n = 2.091) tuvo la enfermedad en estadio III según la estadificación inicial. El grupo ypTis tuvo una supervivencia general reducida en comparación con el grupo ypT0 (HR 1,42, IC 95 % 1,04-1,95, p = 0,028). Otros factores asociados con una menor supervivencia general fueron una edad más avanzada al momento del diagnóstico, un aumento de la puntuación de Charlson-Deyo y un grado tumoral poco diferenciado. Las variables asociadas con una mejor supervivencia fueron el sexo femenino, el seguro privado y la recepción de quimioterapia neoadyuvante y adyuvante. Para la cohorte total, no hubo diferencias en la supervivencia entre el estadio clínico 2 y el estadio 3.LIMITACIONESNo se pudo resumir el tratamiento estándar versus el tratamiento neoadyuvante total. La supervivencia general se definió como el tiempo transcurrido desde la cirugía hasta la muerte por cualquier causa o último contacto, lo que permite algunas muertes erróneamente clasificadas.CONCLUSIONESypTis se asocia con una peor supervivencia general que ypT0 en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que reciben quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía. Para esta cohorte, el estadio clínico no fue un predictor significativo de supervivencia. Se necesitan ensayos prospectivos que comparen la supervivencia de estos resultados patológicos. ( Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Variation in patterns of second primary malignancies across U.S. race and ethnicity groups: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis

PURPOSE

One in six incident cancers in the U.S. is a second primary cancer (SPC). Although primary cancers vary considerably by race and ethnicity, little is known about the population-based occurrence of SPC across these groups.

METHODS

Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 12 data and relative to the general population, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for SPC among 2,457,756 Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asian American/Pacific Islanders (NHAAPI), non-Hispanic black (NHB), and non-Hispanic whites (NHW) cancer survivors aged 45 years or older when diagnosed with a first primary cancer (FPC) from 1992 to 2015.

RESULTS

The risk of second primary bladder cancer after first primary prostate cancer was higher than expected in Hispanic (SIR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01-1.38) and NHAAPI (SIR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.20-1.65) men than NHB and NHW men. Among women with a primary breast cancer, Hispanic, NHAAPI, and NHB women had a nearly 1.5-fold higher risk of a second primary breast cancer, while NHW women had a 6% lower risk. Among men with prostate cancer whose SPC was diagnosed 2 to <12 months, NHB men were at higher risk for colorectal cancer and Hispanic and NHW men for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the same time frame for breast cancer survivors, Hispanic and NHAAPI women were significantly more likely than NHB and NHW women to be diagnosed with a second primary lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Future studies of SPC should investigate the role of shared etiologies, stage of diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle factors after cancer survival across different racial and ethnic populations.

The impact of individual-level income predicted from the BRFSS on the association between insurance status and overall survival among adults with cancer from the SEER program

INTRODUCTION

Among patients with cancer in the United States, Medicaid insurance is associated with worse outcomes than private insurance and with similar outcomes as being uninsured. However, prior studies have not addressed the impact of individual-level socioeconomic status, which determines Medicaid eligibility, on the associations of Medicaid status and cancer outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether differences in cancer outcomes by insurance status persist after accounting for individual-level income.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for 18-64 year-old individuals with cancer from 2014-2016. Individual-level income was imputed using a model trained on Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance Survey participants including covariates also present in SEER. The association of 1-year overall survival and insurance status was estimated with and without adjustment for estimated individual-level income and other covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 416,784 cases in SEER were analyzed. The 1-yr OS for patients with private insurance, Medicaid insurance, and no insurance was 88.7%, 76.1%, and 73.7%, respectively. After adjusting for all covariates except individual-level income, 1-year OS differences were worse with Medicaid (-6.0%, 95% CI = -6.3 to -5.6) and no insurance (-6.7%, 95% CI = -7.3 to -6.0) versus private insurance. After also adjusting for estimated individual-level income, the survival difference for Medicaid patients was similar to privately insured (-0.4%, 95% CI = -1.9 to 1.1) and better than uninsured individuals (2.1%, 95% CI = 0.7 to 3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Income, rather than Medicaid status, may drive poor cancer outcomes in the low-income and Medicaid-insured population. Medicaid insurance coverage may improve cancer outcomes for low-income individuals.

Disparities in Diagnostic Imaging for Initial Local Staging for Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the presence, quality, and timeliness of initial staging imaging for rectal cancer patients, and to evaluate demographic factors associated with disparities.

METHODS

We conducted a chart review of consecutive rectal adenocarcinoma cancer registry cases from a single institution for the period from 2015 to 2020. We recorded whether initial staging MRI or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed, and whether it was performed in or outside the institution. MRI quality was assessed based on compliance to the Society of Abdominal Radiology rectal cancer disease-focused panel protocol recommendations. The times between diagnosis and imaging were calculated. Patients' age, race, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, address, and primary payer were acquired from the electronic medical record. Descriptive analysis, odds ratios, and Student's t tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 346 patients, 39% were female, and the average age was 59 years. A total of 93 patients (26.8%) had no initial staging MRI or endoscopic ultrasound. Of the 142 MRIs evaluated for image quality, 100 patient exams (72.4%) met the criteria for adequate quality. The mean time interval from diagnosis to imaging was 30.9 days. A lower likelihood of receiving initial local staging was associated with being of Hispanic ethnicity (P < .01), having Medicaid or no insurance (P < .01), and residing in a low-income census block (P < .01). Higher quality of imaging was associated with residence in a census block with high median income (P < 0.01), more recent diagnosis (P < .01), and MRI performed at the institution presented (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although radiologic workup variability was found across all demographics, sociodemographic factors have an effect on local initial imaging of rectal cancer, emphasizing the need to improve image acquisition for underserved patients and improve quality standardization at low-volume centers.

Predictors and outcomes of positive surgical margins after local excision of clinical T1 rectal cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

BACKGROUND

Transanal local excision and the use of specialized platforms has become increasingly popular for early-stage rectal cancer. Predictors and outcomes of positive resection margins following transanal local excision for early-stage rectal cancer have yet to be explored.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database of all patients with clinical nonmetastatic node negative T1 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent transanal local excision from 2004 to 2017. Patients with positive surgical margins were compared to those with negative resection margins to determine factors associated with predictors and outcomes of positive surgical margins after transanal local excision. The main outcome measure was overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 318,548 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Database, 9,078 (2.8%) met the inclusion criteria. The positive surgical margins rate was 7.4%. Predictors of positive surgical margins were older age (odds ratio, 1.03; P < .001), higher Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, 1.24; P = .004), poorly differentiated carcinomas (odds ratio, 1.89; P < .001), mucinous (odds ratio, 2.36; P = .003) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (odds ratio, 4.7; P = .048). Independent predictors of reduced survival were older age (hazard ratio, 1.062; P < .001), male sex (hazard ratio, 1.214; P = .011), Charlson comorbidity index 3 (hazard ratio, 1.94; P < .001), pathologic T2 (hazard ratio, 1.27; P = .036) and T3 stages (hazard ratio, 1.77; P = .006), poorly differentiated carcinomas (hazard ratio, 1.47; P = .008), and positive surgical margins (hazard ratio, 1.374; P = .018). The positive surgical margins group's median overall survival was significantly shorter (88 vs 159.3 months, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Positive surgical margins after transanal local excision for early-stage node-negative rectal cancer adversely affects prognosis. Older male patients with higher Charlson comorbidity index scores and poorly differentiated mucinous or signet cell histology tumors are at risk for positive surgical margins. Patient selection according to these suggested criteria may help avoid positive surgical margins.

Health insurance status and cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in the United States

Previous studies using data from the early 2000s demonstrated that patients who were uninsured were more likely to present with late-stage disease and had worse short-term survival after cancer diagnosis in the United States. In this report, the authors provide comprehensive data on the associations of health insurance coverage type with stage at diagnosis and long-term survival in individuals aged 18-64 years who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 with 19 common cancers from the National Cancer Database, with survival follow-up through December 31, 2019. Compared with privately insured patients, Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage (III/IV) cancer for all stageable cancers combined and separately. For all stageable cancers combined and for six cancer sites-prostate, colorectal, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, oral cavity, liver, and esophagus-uninsured patients with Stage I disease had worse survival than privately insured patients with Stage II disease. Patients without private insurance coverage had worse short-term and long-term survival at each stage for all cancers combined; patients who were uninsured had worse stage-specific survival for 12 of 17 stageable cancers and had worse survival for leukemia and brain tumors. Expanding access to comprehensive health insurance coverage is crucial for improving access to cancer care and outcomes, including stage at diagnosis and survival.

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Stage II and III Rectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Insurance status has been associated with disparities in stage at cancer diagnosis. We examined how Medicaid expansion (ME) impacted diagnoses, surgical treatment, use of neoadjuvant therapies (NCRT), and outcomes for Stage II and III rectal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We used 2010-2017 American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify patients ages 18-65, with Medicaid as primary form of payment, and were diagnosed with Stage II or III rectal cancer. Patients were stratified based on Census bureau division's ME adoption rates of High, Medium, Low. Overall trends were examined, and patient characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after ME date of 1/1/2014.

RESULTS

Over 8 years of NCDB data examined, there was an increasing trend of Stage II and III rectal cancer diagnoses, surgical resection, and use of NCRT for Medicaid patients. We observed an increase in age, proportion of White Medicaid patients in Low ME divisions, and proportion of fourth income quartile patients in High ME divisions. Univariate analysis showed decreased use of open surgery for all 3 categories after ME, but adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were not significant based on multivariate analysis. NCRT utilization increased after ME for all 3 ME adoption categories and aOR significantly increased for Low and High ME divisions. ME significantly decreased 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion had important impacts on increasing Stage II and III rectal cancer diagnoses, use of NCRT, and decreased 90-day mortality for patients with Medicaid. Our study supports increasing health insurance coverage to improve Medicaid patient outcomes in rectal cancer care.

Comparing outcomes for non-metastatic rectal cancer in academic vs. community centers: A propensity-matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the impact of hospital academic status on outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. We compare these outcomes for nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma at academic versus community institutions.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent resection. Propensity score matching was performed across facility cohorts to balance confounding covariates. Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox-proportional hazards regression were used to analyze survival, other short and long-term outcomes were analyzed by way of logistic regression.

RESULTS

After matching, 15,096 patients were included per cohort. Academic centers were associated with significantly decreased odds of conversion and positive margins with significantly increased odds of ≥12 regional nodes examined. Academic programs also had decreased odds of 30 and 90-day mortality and decreased 5-year mortality hazard. After matching for facility volume, no significant differences in outcomes between centers was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference between academic and community centers in outcomes following surgery for non-metastatic rectal cancer was seen after matching for facility procedural volume.

Insurance Status in Rectal Cancer is Associated With Age at Diagnosis and May be Associated With Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 44 180 new cases of rectal cancer diagnosed annually. While surgical resection remains the standard of care for definitive treatment, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) has significantly reduced recurrence rates postoperatively. NCRT is indicated for T3/T4 tumors, and relative indications include patients with T1/T2 lesions with clinically positive nodes. While this remains the standard of care, all patients may not receive equal treatment for their rectal cancer depending on various healthcare disparities. We aimed to discover how insurance status affected rectal cancer patients' time of diagnosis to treatment, age of diagnosis, and overall vitality.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective chart and cancer registry review was performed for all patients diagnosed with rectal cancer of any stage between 2011 and 2018. A total of 94 rectal cancer patients were included in the analysis. Age, race, sex, insurance status, vitality, and grade were assessed. Time in days of diagnosis to the time of first treatment (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation) was measured. Continuous variables were reported as means and SDs or medians and interquartile ranges and were analyzed with the unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages and were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was determined with a P < .05. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Total race breakdown was as follows: white (61%), African-American (30%), and other (3%). There was no statistically significant difference in diagnosis time to first treatment in the uninsured versus insured groups (P = .9). There was a statistically significant difference in the age of diagnosis with insured mean age of 60.9 years and uninsured mean age of 52.4 years (P = .0080). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the 2 groups (P = .54). For those who went onto have surgery, there was no difference in the median number of lymph nodes harvested between the 2 groups (P = .73).

CONCLUSION

Insurance status did not affect timing to treatment or survival. Uninsured patients had a younger age of diagnosis by approximately 8 years on average. Uninsured patients received the same quality surgeries as uninsured patients in regard to lymph node harvests.

Macroeconomic environment and insurance-mortality relationship: An analysis of gender-based disparity among non-elderly adult patients of melanoma and lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients exhibit disparity in mortality risks across demographic divisions as well as insurance groups. The effects of macroeconomic environment also vary for such strata. This study analyses the gaps between mortality risks for male and female cancer patients with and without insurance and examines how such gaps transform over time with macroeconomic shifts.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical and treatment records of 45,750 melanoma and 91,157 lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2007-2009 and 2011-2013 were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier test was applied to ascertain survival probability of each insurance group, while Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess relative mortality risk for Medicaid and uninsured patients, for the whole data as well as separately for both time periods and genders.

RESULTS

Both the hazard ratios and change thereof over time are greater for female patients without insurance, than for male patients. More than any insurance-gender subgroup, uninsured female patients of melanoma have much increased hazard ratios, from 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.92] to 2.22 [95% CI, 1.67-2.94].

CONCLUSION

Despite diagnostic improvements and technology advancements, the adverse effects of macroeconomic crisis are associated with increased relative mortality risks for cancer patients without insurance, more for women than men.

Epidemiologic and survival trends in adult primary bone tumors of the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Malignant primary spinal tumors are rare making it difficult to perform large studies comparing epidemiologic, survival, and treatment trends. We investigated the largest registry of primary bone tumors, the National Cancer Database (NCDB), to compare epidemiologic and survival trends among these tumors.

PURPOSE

To use the NCDB to describe current epidemiologic trends, treatment modalities, and overall survival rates in patients with chordomas, osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas of the mobile spine. The secondary objective was to determine prognostic factors that impact overall survival rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 1,011 patients with primary bone tumors of the spine (377 chordomas, 223 chondrosarcomas, 278 Ewing sarcomas, and 133 osteosarcomas).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Five-year survival.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 1,011 patients in the NCDB from 2004 through 2015 with histologically confirmed primary osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, or chordoma of the spine. Demographic, clinical, and outcomes data were compiled and compared using chi-squared tests and ANOVA. Long-term survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with statistical comparisons based on the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine survival determinants.

RESULTS

Surgical resection was the primary mode of treatment for chondrosarcoma (90%), chordoma (84%), and osteosarcoma (80%). The treatment for Ewing sarcoma was multimodal involving chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection. Five-year survival rates varied significantly with chordomas and chondrosarcomas having the greatest survival (70% and 69%), osteosarcomas having the worse survival (38%), and Ewing having intermediate 5-year survival at 62% (overall log-rank p<.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly improved 5-year survival rates with younger age at diagnosis, private insurance status, lower comorbidity score, lower tumor grade, smaller tumor size, surgical resection, and negative surgical margin. Radiation therapy only improved survival for Ewing sarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the most comprehensive description of the epidemiologic, treatment, and survival trends of primary bone tumors of the mobile spine. Second, patient and tumor characteristics associated with improved 5-year survival were identified using a multivariate model.

Trends in Cancer Survival by Health Insurance Status in California From 1997 to 2014

Importance

There have been substantial improvements in the early detection, treatment, and survival from cancer in the United States, but it is not clear to what extent patients with different types of health insurance have benefitted from these advancements.

Objective

To examine trends in cancer survival by health insurance status from January 1997 to December 2014.

Design, Setting, and Participants

California Cancer Registry (a statewide cancer surveillance system) data were used to estimate population-based survival by health insurance status in 3 calendar periods: January 1997 to December 2002, January 2003 to December 2008, and January 2009 to December 2014 with follow-up through 2014. Overall, 1 149 891 patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer, or melanoma in California were included in the study.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Five-year all-cause and cancer-specific survival probabilities by insurance category and calendar period for each cancer site and sex; hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for each insurance category (none, Medicare, other public) compared with private insurance in each calendar period.

Results

According to data from 1 149 891 patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer, or melanoma gathered from the California Cancer Registry, improvements in survival were almost exclusively limited to patients with private or Medicare insurance. For patients with other public or no insurance, survival was largely unchanged or declined. Relative to privately insured patients, cancer-specific mortality was higher in uninsured patients for all cancers except prostate, and disparities were largest from 2009 to 2014 for breast (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.45-2.03), lung (men: HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31 and women: HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.50), and colorectal cancer (women: HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.62). Mortality was also higher for patients with other public insurance for all cancers except lung, and disparities were largest from 2009 to 2014 for breast (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34), prostate (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31), and colorectal cancer (men: HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.23 and women: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20).

Conclusions and Relevance

After accounting for patient and clinical characteristics, survival disparities for men with prostate cancer and women with lung or colorectal cancer increased significantly over time, reflecting a lack of improvement in survival for patients with other public or no insurance. To mitigate these growing disparities, all patients with cancer need access to health insurance that covers all the necessary elements of health care, from prevention and early detection to timely treatment according to clinical guidelines.

Health Insurance and Colorectal Cancer Survival in Khon Kaen, Thailand

Background: Evidence from healthcare studies demonstrates that patients’ health insurance affects service accessibility and the outcome of treatment. However, assessment on how colorectal cancer survival relates to health insurance is limited. Objective: The study examined the association between health insurance and colorectal cancer survival in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted with 1,931 colorectal cancer patients from Khon Kaen cancer registry between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2012, and was followed-up until December 31, 2015. Relative survival was used to estimate the survival rate. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the relationship between health insurance and colorectal cancer survival, represented with the hazard ratio. Result: Most of the participants were males, and the median age was 62 years. The median survival time was 2.25 years (95% CI: 2.00-2.51). The five-year observed survival rate and relative survival rate were 36.87 (95% CI: 34.66-39.08) and, 42.28 (95% CI: 39.75-44.81), respectively. The factors that showed significant associations with poorer survival after adjustment for gender and age were non-surgical treatments (HRadj=1.88;95%CI=1.45-2.45), advanced stage (III+IV) (HRadj=2.50; 95%CI=2.00-3.12), histological grading in poorly differentiated (HRadj=1.84; 95%CI=1.32-2.56), and Universal Coverage Scheme (HRadj=1.37;95%CI=1.09-1.72). Conclusion: The survival of colorectal cancer patients in the Universal Coverage Scheme was likely to be poorer than in the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. This indicates an urgent need for a national program for colorectal cancer screening in the general population and access to health insurance.

Review of Colorectal Studies Using the National Cancer Database

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a large clinical oncology database developed with data collected from Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited facilities. The CoC is managed under the American College of Surgeons, and is a multidisciplinary team that maintains standards in cancer care delivery in health care settings. This database has been used in multiple cancer-focused studies and reports on cancer diagnosis, hospital-level, and patient-related demographics. The focus of this review is to explore and discuss the use of NCDB in colorectal surgery research. Furthermore, our aim for this review is to formulate a guide for researchers who are interested in using the NCDB to complete colorectal research.

Effect of proximity to specialty care on outcomes for biliary cancers: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The management of biliary cancers is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Because it is unknown how access to specialty care affects resource use and survival in patients with biliary cancer, we conducted a population-based study to understand the needs of these patients and the relation of geography to care delivery and clinical outcomes for biliary cancer in Alberta.

METHODS

All patients with biliary cancer diagnosed in Alberta from Sept. 1, 2001, to Dec. 31, 2015 were included in this population-based retrospective cohort study. Data were extracted from administrative databases and the 2011 Canadian census. Driving time and types of medical services were tracked throughout the patients' clinical course. We categorized proximity to specialty care according to driving time to the nearest specialist. The primary outcome was overall survival. We conducted Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate the effects of driving time on overall survival and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the effect of driving time on treatment types and stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 1610 patients with biliary cancer; they accounted for 117 381 medical encounters. Patients living 120 minutes or more from the nearest hepatobiliary surgeon and from the nearest cancer centre had significantly decreased survival (hazard ratio [and 95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.27 [1.17-1.37]) and 1.27 [1.14-1.41], respectively). Location of residence was not associated with advanced stage or probability of undergoing surgery or a biliary drainage procedure. Patients who lived 120 minutes or more from a cancer centre were less likely than those who lived less than 120 minutes away to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.88). Subgroup analysis showed that the effect of travel time was especially pronounced among those who received only best supportive care and those who had biliary drains.

INTERPRETATION

Geography and accessibility to specialty care affected survival in patients with biliary cancer. Further study is required to understand how patients with biliary drains and those receiving best supportive care are affected by proximity to specialty care. This will aid in the identification of strategies to provide improved care for this subgroup who are particularly affected by geography.

An Exploration of Patient Navigation and Community Health Worker Activities Across National Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs

Purpose: Health disparities persist across the cancer care continuum. Patient navigator (PN) and community health worker (CHW) interventions are designed to increase health equity. National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) awardees develop and implement plans to coordinate cancer prevention and control activities, including supporting PN and CHW interventions. This content analysis examined NCCCP action plans to assess the extent to which jurisdictions report engaging in PN and/or CHW activities.

Methods: We abstracted PN and CHW content from NCCCP action plans and coded content according to specific areas of PN and/or CHW intervention (e.g., screening, survivorship, and cancer type), used descriptive statistics to characterize overall results, and calculated chi-squares to determine whether programs engaged PNs and CHWs differently.

Results: Eighty-two percent (n=53) of 65 NCCCP action plans had content related to PN and/or CHW activities, with more PN language (83%) than CHW (58%). These action plans described engaging PNs and CHWs in activities across the cancer continuum, but particularly for screening (60%) and survivorship (55%). Eighty-one percent of these plans described activities related to workforce development, such as training and standardizing roles and competencies. Programs engaged CHWs more often than PNs for outreach and in community settings.

Conclusion: The majority of NCCCP awardees reported engaging in PN and/or CHW activities. Understanding how NCCCP awardees engage PNs and CHWs, including awardees' needs for workforce development in this area, can help Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provide more focused technical assistance as programs increase engagement of PNs and CHWs to improve health equity.

Short-term intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for head and neck cancer patients maintaining quality of life

Purpose

Head and neck cancer treatment achieves good locoregional tumor control rates while causing severe side effects. Therapy with chemotherapeutic drugs administered intravenously is limited because either the concentrations at the tumor site are too low or the total dosages are too high. The evaluation of a technique for short-term intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy is described herein.

Methods

In a retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of 97 patients with head and neck cancers who received short-term intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (62 patients previously untreated, 35 patients with prior radiotherapy). All patients refused further radiotherapy. Response rates, overall survival and adverse effects were the study endpoints. The blood supply of the tumors was controlled with indigocarmine blue infusion and staining of the tumor region.

Results

Complete or partial response was found in 67%, 52% and 63% of previously untreated patients and in 25%, 30% and 29%, respectively, of previously irradiated patients for staging groups I–III, IVA and IVB/C. Patients with T3/T4 tumors who were previously irradiated showed a median overall survival of 9 months, and those without pretreatment showed a median overall survival of 22.5 months. None of the patients required tube feeding. No new case of dysphagia, xerostomia, or functional speech and hearing loss was reported. Pain and clinical symptoms were reduced for all patient groups. Indigocarmine staining showed reduced tumor blood supply in previously irradiated regions but good blood supply in untreated regions.

Conclusions

Short-term intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy achieves promising response rates and lacks severe adverse effects.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-018-2784-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association of insurance status with survival in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

The effect of insurance status on overall survival (OS) of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is unclear. We identified 11,861 patients from the US National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with CTCL from 2004-2014, of which 6088 had private insurance, 756 had Medicaid, 4536 had Medicare, and 481 are uninsured. Privately insured patients were more likely to present at an early stage (p < .001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, privately insured patients had significantly longer OS than patients with Medicaid (HR: 1.936, 95% CI: 1.680-2.230, p < .001), Medicare (HR: 1.342, 95% CI: 1.222-1.474, p < .001), or no insurance (HR 1.849, 95% CI: 1.539-2.222, p < .001). The survival advantage of privately insured patients persisted on relative survival and propensity score-matched analyses. In conclusion, privately insured patients were more likely to present at an early stage, and had longer OS than patients who were Medicaid-, Medicare-, or not insured.

Disparities in breast cancer: a multi-institutional comparative analysis focusing on American Hispanics

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death in Hispanic/Latino women nationwide. Hispanic women are more likely to be presented with advanced disease and adverse prognosis subtypes. The aim of this study is to describe the clinico‐ pathological characteristics and disparities in breast cancer in this group at two tertiary care University‐based medical centers. After IRB approval, Cancer registry was used to analyze the variables of 3441 patients with breast cancer diagnosed and treated consecutively at two large tertiary University based medical and cancer center database centers in El Paso, TX and Loma Linda, CA between 2005 and 2015. Association between race/ethnicity and cancer type, stage, hormone receptor status and treatment option were investigated. Overall 45.5% of the patients were Hispanic (n: 1566) and those were more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age (57 years) similar to African Americans, more likely to have invasive ductal carcinoma type (82.7%) & triple negative disease (17.1%, 95%CI: 15% to 19%). 58.8% of Hispanics (95%CI: 56% to 61%) have hormone receptor (HR)+ & HER2− as opposed to 71% in non‐Hispanic White people. In addition, Hispanic individuals presented with advanced stages of BC (25.3%, 95% CI: 23% to 28%) similar to African American (25.4%), and had a lower proportion of lumpectomy (50%) similar to African American (50%). When compared to African American patients, Hispanic patients had a higher prevalence of triple negative BC (17.11% in Hispanics Versus 13.86% in African American). Conclusion: Hispanics had significantly higher relative risk of advanced stages at presentation (Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) = 2.05, P < 0.001), triple negative tumors (RRR = 2.64, P < 0.0001), HER2 + /HR ‐ disease (RRR = 1.77, P < 0.0001), and less HR+ /HER2− BC (RRR = 0.69, P < 0.0001). Hispanics and African Americans are diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age, have a higher prevalence of Triple negative breast cancer, and are diagnosed at more advanced stages of disease. Increasing awareness and targeting minority populations for health promotion interventions, screening and early detection continue to be of paramount importance to reduce the burden of health disparities.

Clinico-pathologic disparities of breast cancer in Hispanic/Latina women

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Hispanic/Latina women nationwide. Limited cancer research has been conducted in this population. El Paso, Texas is a large border city with a population of around 900,000, of which 85% are Latinos and would provide a suitable setting for this study. The aim of this study is to evaluate ethnic differences and cancer characteristics in Hispanic/latina women with breast cancer.

METHODS

After IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed the variables of patients with breast cancer treated consecutively at a large tertiary medical center in El Paso, TX between 2005-2015. Descriptive statistics, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

1,252 patients were identified. Mean age at diagnosis was 57 years. 1074 were Hispanics/Latinas (86%). When comparing Hispanics versus non-Hispanics, 31% of Hispanics compared to 24% Non-Hispanics were diagnosed at age <50 (P = 0.043). More Hispanics are uninsured (34%) compared to Non-Hispanics (25%) (p = 0.008). Hispanics presenting with advanced stages were more likely to be uninsured (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis confirms that Hispanics/Latinas are diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age and are more commonly uninsured than Non-Hispanics. We did not observe significant differences in the prevalence of ER+, triple negative or Her2 -neu positive disease or stages at presentation between the 2 groups in this cohort, however the non-Hispanic group was constituted only 14% of the studied population. A larger multi-institutional comparative study is being conducted to confirm these findings.

Regional socioeconomic disparities in outcomes for workers with low back pain in the United States

BACKGROUND

Although regional socioeconomic (SE) factors have been associated with worse health outcomes, prior studies have not addressed important confounders or work disability.

METHODS

A national sample of 59 360 workers' compensation (WC) cases to evaluate impact of regional SE factors on medical costs and length of disability (LOD) in occupational low back pain (LBP).

RESULTS

Lower neighborhood median household incomes (MHI) and higher state unemployment rates were associated with longer LOD. Medical costs were lower in states with more workers receiving Social Security Disability, and in areas with lower MHI, but this varied in magnitude and direction among neighborhoods. Medical costs were higher in more urban, more racially diverse, and lower education neighborhoods.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional SE disparities in medical costs and LOD occur even when health insurance, health care availability, and indemnity benefits are similar. Results suggest opportunities to improve care and disability outcomes through targeted health care and disability interventions.

Population-Level Differences in Rectal Cancer Survival in Uninsured Patients Are Partially Explained by Differences in Treatment

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer (RC) is a common malignancy with a substantial mortality but good survival for patients with optimally treated nonmetastatic disease. Lack of insurance may compromise access to care and therefore compromise survival. Here, we examine RC survival by insurance type.

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were used to determine 1- to 3-year survival for patients with RC by insurance type (Medicaid, uninsured, other insurance).

RESULTS

Patients with Medicaid or no insurance presented at later stages and were less likely to receive definitive surgery. Overall 3-year survival was higher for patients with other insurance compared with Medicaid-insured (+22.2% units) and uninsured (+18.8% units) patients. Major differences in survival were still observed after adjustment for stage. When patients with stage II and III RC were considered, 3-year survival was higher for patients with other insurance versus those with Medicaid (+16.2% units) and uninsured patients (+12.2% units). However, when the analysis was limited to patients with stage II and III disease who received radiation therapy followed by definitive surgery, the difference decreased to +11.8% units and +7.3% units, respectively, for Medicaid and no insurance.

CONCLUSION

For patients with stage II and III RC, much of the difference in survival between uninsured patients and those with insurance other than Medicaid can be explained by differences in treatment. Further efforts to determine the cause of residual differences as well as efforts to improve access to standard-of-care treatment for uninsured patients may improve population-level survival for RC. The Oncologist 2017;22:351-358 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Insurance status affects survival for patients with rectal cancer, but a substantial proportion of the difference in survival can be corrected if standard-of-care treatment is given. Every effort should be made to ensure that uninsured or publically insured patients receive standard-of-care treatment with as little delay as possible to improve patient outcomes.

Not Just an Urban Phenomenon: Uninsured Rural Trauma Patients at Increased Risk for Mortality

Introduction

National studies of largely urban populations showed increased risk of traumatic death among uninsured patients, as compared to those insured. No similar studies have been done for major trauma centers serving rural states.

Methods

We performed retrospective analyses using trauma registry records from adult, non-burn patients admitted to a single American College of Surgeons-certified Level 1 trauma center in a rural state (2003–2010, n=13,680) and National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) registry records (2002–2008, n=380,182). Risk of traumatic death was estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

We found that 9% of trauma center patients and 27% of NTDB patients were uninsured. Overall mortality was similar for both (~4.5%). After controlling for covariates, uninsured trauma center patients were almost five times more likely to die and uninsured NTDB patients were 75% more likely to die than commercially insured patients. The risk of death among Medicaid patients was not significantly different from the commercially insured for either dataset.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that even with an inclusive statewide trauma system and an emergency department that does not triage by payer status, uninsured patients presenting to the trauma center were at increased risk of traumatic death relative to patients with commercial insurance.

The Affordable Care Act and Expanded Insurance Eligibility Among Nonelderly Adult Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors may face barriers to accessing health insurance and experience financial hardship because of medical expenditures. We examined potential improvements in access to insurance for cancer survivors through adult Medicaid expansions and premium tax credits in the new insurance marketplaces under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

METHODS

Eligibility for Medicaid and premium tax credits was simulated for cancer survivors age 18 to 64 years in the 2008 to 2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey using a detailed deterministic model. Financial hardship was determined as: 1) delays or unmet need for medical, prescription, or dental care because of cost or insurance issues and/or 2) family out-of-pocket medical spending that was 20% or more of gross income. Descriptive analyses were stratified by whether the state of residence chose to expand Medicaid by January 2015. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Overall, 14.7% of 9.44 million cancer survivors were uninsured, with 18% reporting financial hardship. Under the ACA, 19% overall, 30% of the uninsured, and 39% of those reporting financial hardship would be Medicaid eligible. An additional 10% would be eligible for premium tax credits, with the remainder able to participate in the Marketplace without tax credits. However, 21% of uninsured cancer survivors in states not expanding Medicaid would be ineligible for assistance with coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the ACA, many of the uninsured and a larger proportion of survivors facing financial hardship will be eligible for Medicaid or premium tax credits in the Marketplaces. ACA implementation will dramatically enhance insurance availability and is likely to reduce financial hardship for vulnerable cancer survivors.

Socioeconomic inequalities in relative survival of rectal cancer most obvious in stage III

INTRODUCTION

The association between socioeconomic status (SES) and relative survival of rectal cancer is little investigated. We hypothesized that the impact on risk of death by SES would be much smaller when differences in background mortality (comorbidity, lifestyle factors) were taken into account, i.e. in modelling relative survival of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Individual data on civil status, education, and income were linked to the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 1995-2005 (n = 16,713). Specific life tables by socioeconomic group were used to calculate relative survival, and modelling included age, sex, stage, time period, and SES. The same covariates were applied in a Cox regression based on absolute survival.

RESULTS

Stage distribution was associated with civil status, education, and income (p < 0.001). In spite of modelling based on relative survival, an increased risk of death was found for all other patients compared with those who were married, as well as for all other patients compared with those with the highest income. The pattern was fundamentally the same as in a Cox regression model, only the point estimates were slightly reduced using the relative approach. In stage-specific modelling of relative survival, income was of particular importance in stage III; the hazard ratio (HR) for lowest versus the highest income was 1.37 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.64]. There were also significant differences by income among patients who had a major surgical resection (stage IV excluded).

CONCLUSION

Large and clinically relevant socioeconomic inequalities remained in stage-adjusted analyses of relative survival, also in a setting of universal healthcare and no screening program operating.

A Multi-institutional Analysis of Insurance Status as a Predictor of Morbidity Following Breast Reconstruction

Background:

Although recent literature suggests that patients with Medicaid and Medicare are more likely than those with private insurance to experience complications following a variety of procedures, there has been limited evaluation of insurance-based disparities in reconstructive surgery outcomes. Using a large, multi-institutional database, we sought to evaluate the potential impact of insurance status on complications following breast reconstruction.

Methods:

We identified all breast reconstructive cases in the 2008 to 2011 Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons clinical registry. Propensity scores were calculated for each case, and insurance cohorts were matched with regard to demographic and clinical characteristics. Outcomes of interest included 15 medical and 13 surgical complications.

Results:

Propensity-score matching yielded 493 matched patients for evaluation of Medicaid and 670 matched patients for evaluation of Medicare. Overall complication rates did not significantly differ between patients with Medicaid or Medicare and those with private insurance (P = 0.167 and P = 0.861, respectively). Risk-adjusted multivariate regressions corroborated this finding, demonstrating that Medicaid and Medicare insurance status does not independently predict surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, explantation, or wound dehiscence (all P > 0.05). Medicaid insurance status significantly predicted flap failure (odds ratio = 3.315, P = 0.027).

Conclusions:

This study is the first to investigate the differential effects of payer status on outcomes following breast reconstruction. Our results suggest that Medicaid and Medicare insurance status does not independently predict increased overall complication rates following breast reconstruction. This finding underscores the commitment of the plastic surgery community to providing consistent care for patients, irrespective of insurance status.

Disparities in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival in nonelderly adult patients with cancer according to insurance status

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the association of insurance status with disease stage at presentation, treatment, and survival among the top 10 most deadly cancers using the SEER database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 473,722 patients age 18 to 64 years who were diagnosed with one of the 10 most deadly cancers in the SEER database from 2007 to 2010 were analyzed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analyses to assess the effect of patient and tumor characteristics on cause-specific death.

RESULTS

Overall, patients with non-Medicaid insurance were less likely to present with distant disease (16.9%) than those with Medicaid coverage (29.1%) or without insurance coverage (34.7%; P < .001). Patients with non-Medicaid insurance were more likely to receive cancer-directed surgery and/or radiation therapy (79.6%) compared with those with Medicaid coverage (67.9%) or without insurance coverage (62.1%; P < .001). In a Cox regression that adjusted for age, race, sex, marital status, residence, percent of county below federal poverty level, site, stage, and receipt of cancer-directed surgery and/or radiation therapy, patients were more likely to die as a result of their disease if they had Medicaid coverage (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.41 to 1.47; P < .001) or no insurance (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.51; P < .001) compared with non-Medicaid insurance.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with the 10 most deadly cancers, those with Medicaid coverage or without insurance were more likely to present with advanced disease, were less likely to receive cancer-directed surgery and/or radiation therapy, and experienced worse survival.

Using the American College of Surgeons cancer registry to drive quality

A discussion of the uses and future plans of the National Cancer Data Base, which has been reengineered in recent years for applying and reporting quality measure data and most recently for rapid case ascertainment and patient care tracking.

Characteristics of colorectal cancer survival in an urban county hospital

PURPOSE

Disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) survival have been associated with race/ethnicity, screening, and insurance status, but less is known about how geographic and socioeconomic heterogeneity may modulate these factors. We examined CRC outcomes in an urban underserved population with sociodemographic factors distinctly different than those previously studied.

METHODS

In this 11-year retrospective study, the demographics and clinical features of 331 CRC patients from a Northern California urban county hospital were reviewed. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate differences in 5-year mortality.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 38 % Whites, 37 % Asians, 22 % Hispanics, and 4 % Blacks. Most of the patients either had government-sponsored insurance (62.5 %) or were uninsured (21.8 %). Compared to national SEER data, stage IV disease was more prevalent in our study cohort (37 vs 20 %) and the overall 5-year survival rate was worse (52.9 vs 64.3 %). CRC screening was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.24, P=0.002), while insurance status was not. In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (HR 2.48, confidence interval (CI) 1.39-4.42, P=0.002) and late stage (stage IV: HR 32.46, CI 9.92-106.25, P<0.001) predicted worse outcomes. Contrary to some population-based studies, Hispanics in our cohort had significantly better overall mortality compared to Whites (HR 0.46, CI 0.29-0.74, P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in CRC outcomes for urban underserved populations persist. However, there is geographic and socioeconomic heterogeneity in factors that have been previously shown to contribute to mortality. Screening and therapeutic strategies formulated from larger population-based studies may not be generalizable to these unique subpopulations.

Interaction between age and race alters predicted survival in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer persist. Late stage at presentation and lack of stage-specific treatment may be contributing factors. We sought to evaluate the magnitude of disparity remaining after accounting for gender, stage, and treatment using predicted survival models.

METHODS

We used institutional tumor registries from a public health system (two hospitals) and a not-for-profit health system (nine hospitals) from 1995 to 2011. Demographics, stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival were recorded. Hazard ratios (HRs) and predicted HRs were determined by Cox regression and postestimation analyses.

RESULTS

There were 6,990 patients: 55.7 % white, 23.6 % African American, 15.1 % Hispanic, and 5.6 % Asian/other. Predictors of survival were surgery (HR 0.57, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.70), chemotherapy (HR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.62-0.79), female gender (HR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.83-0.90), age (HR 1.04, 95 % CI 1.03-1.05), and African American race (HR 3.6, 95 % CI 1.5-8.4). Balancing for stage, gender, and treatment reduced the predicted HRs for African Americans by 28 % and Hispanics by 17 %. In this model, African American and Hispanics still had the worst predicted HRs at younger ages, but whites had the worst predicted HR after age 75.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender, stage, and treatment partially accounted for worsened survival in African Americans and Hispanics at all ages. At younger ages, race-related disparities remained which may reflect tumor biology or other unknown factors. Once gender, stage, and treatment are balanced at older ages, the increased mortality observed in whites may be due to factors such as comorbidities. Further system- and patient-level study is needed to investigate reasons for colorectal cancer survival disparities.

Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status

Previous studies found that uninsured and Medicaid insured cancer patients have poorer outcomes than cancer patients with private insurance. We examined the association between health insurance status and survival of New Jersey patients 18–64 diagnosed with seven common cancers during 1999–2004. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals for 5-year cause-specific survival were calculated from Cox proportional hazards regression models; health insurance status was the primary predictor with adjustment for other significant factors in univariate chi-square or Kaplan–Meier survival log-rank tests. Two diagnosis periods by health insurance status were compared using Kaplan–Meier survival log-rank tests. For breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and prostate cancer, uninsured and Medicaid insured patients had significantly higher risks of death than privately insured patients. For bladder cancer, uninsured patients had a significantly higher risk of death than privately insured patients. Survival improved between the two diagnosis periods for privately insured patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer and NHL, for Medicaid insured patients with NHL, and not at all for uninsured patients. Survival from cancer appears to be related to a complex set of demographic and clinical factors of which insurance status is a part. While ensuring that everyone has adequate health insurance is an important step, additional measures must be taken to address cancer survival disparities.

Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation

BACKGROUND

To improve access to breast reconstruction for mastectomy patients, the United States enacted the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act in January of 1999. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of this legislation on patients with different insurance plans.

METHODS

Women aged ≥18 years who underwent mastectomy for cancer were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2000-2009) and were classified according to their immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) status. Trends in rates of IBR were described for each insurance category. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, race, estimated household income, and Elixhauser comorbidity index was performed to evaluate the relation between insurance status and IBR.

RESULTS

In total, 168,236 patients were identified who underwent a mastectomy during the study interval. Across the 10-year study period, rates of IBR increased 4.2-fold in Medicaid patients, 2.9-fold in Medicare patients, 2.6-fold in privately insured patients, and 2.1-fold in self-pay patients (P < .01). However, after adjustment for confounders, women without private insurance were less likely to undergo IBR compared with women who had private insurance (Medicaid: odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.37; Medicare: OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.49-0.58; self-pay: OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.37-0.50; other types of nonprivate insurance: OR, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.56-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

After the enactment of policy designed to improve access to IBR, Medicaid and Medicare patients experienced the greatest relative increase in rates of IBR. Although policy changes had the most impact on traditionally underserved populations, disparities still exist. Future studies should endeavor to understand why such disparities have persisted.

Health systems performance and cancer outcomes

Do the characteristics of health systems influence cancer outcomes? Although caveats are required when undertaking international comparisons of both health systems and cancer outcomes, observed differences cannot solely be explained by data problems or economic development. Health systems can influence cancer outcomes through three mechanisms: coverage, innovation, and quality of care. First, in countries where population coverage is incomplete, patients may find certain services excluded or face substantial copayments or deductibles. Second, there are variations in the rate at which innovative treatments are introduced, reflecting in particular the need for publicly funded health systems to compare costs and benefits of increasingly expensive treatments given demands for other treatments. Third, systematic differences in quality of care (early diagnosis, timely and equitable access to specialist care, and existence of systematic coordination between these activities) may lead to variations in cancer outcomes.

Overexpression of HMGA2 promotes metastasis and impacts survival of colorectal cancers

PURPOSE

This study aims to address the hypothesis that the high-mobility group A2 (HMGA2), an oncofetal protein, relates to survivability and serves as a prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This is a retroprospective multiple center study. The HMGA2 expression level was determined by performing immunohistochemistry on surgical tissue samples of 89 CRCs from a training set and 191 CRCs from a validation set. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and COX proportional hazard model were employed to analyze the survivability.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that the expression of HMGA2 significantly correlates with distant metastasis in training set (odds ratio, OR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.37-9.70) and validation set (OR = 6.38, 95% CI: 1.47-43.95). Survival analysis revealed that the overexpression of HMGA2 is significantly associated with poor survival of CRC patients (P < 0.05). The adjusted HRs for overall survival were 2.38 (95% CI: 1.30-4.34) and 2.14 (95% CI: 1.21-3.79) in training and validation sets, respectively. Further investigation revealed that HMGA2 delays the clearance of γ-H2AX in HCT-116 and SW480 cells post γ-irradiation, which supports our finding that CRC patients with HMAG2-positive staining in primary tumors had augmented the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.63).

CONCLUSION

Overexpression of HMGA2 is associated with metastasis and unequivocally occurred in parallel with reduced survival rates of patients with CRC. Therefore, HMGA2 may potentially serve as a biomarker for predicting aggressive CRC with poor survivability and as an indicator for better response of radiotherapy.