Recurrent Versus Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Evolving Landscape and the Role of Immunotherapy

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is among the ten most common cancers worldwide, with advanced SCCHN presenting with a 5-year survival of 34% in the case of nodal involvement and 8% in the case of metastatic disease. Disease-free survival at 2 years is 67% for stage II and 33% for stage III tumors, whereas 12-30% of patients undergo distant failures after curative treatment. Previous treatments often hinder the success of salvage surgery and/or reirradiation, while the standard of care for the majority of metastatic SCCHN remains palliative chemo- and immuno-therapy, with few patients eligible for locoregional treatments. The aim of this paper is to review the characteristics of recurrent SCCHN, based on different recurrence sites, and metastatic disease; we will also explore the possibilities not only of salvage surgery and reirradiation but also systemic therapy choices and locoregional treatment for metastatic SCCHN.

A comparative dose-escalation analysis for reirradiated cancer patients with and without appropriate dose mapping

This study aims to compare dose escalation between two groups of reirradiated cancer patients, one with the previous contour and radiotherapy plan available on the treatment planning system and the other without. First group is identified as DICOM-group, while the other one is called non-DICOM group. The current study included 89 patients, 57 in the DICOM, and 32 in the non-DICOM group, who received reirradiation for recurrent or second primary tumours between 2019 and 2021. For the DICOM group, doses to 0.2cc volume for spine, brainstem, and optic apparatus from first radiation were converted into structures and transferred to reirradiation CT using deformable registration. First, one radiotherapy plan was created using the doctor prescribed dose (baseline prescription RxD_B); further an escalated dose (RxD_E) plan, taking into account all the dose volume parameters from previous radiation, was created only for DICOM group. In non-DICOM group patients were planned only for RxD_B. The maximum accepted dose escalation was 21 Gy. Radiotherapy prescription dose during earlier (first) treatment in DICOM and non-DICOM groups were 61 ± 5.6 Gy and 30-66 Gy, respectively. DICOM and non-DICOM groups had nearly identical baseline doses: 52.5 ± 10.7 Gy and 50.6 ± 6.9 Gy (difference 1.9 ± 12.7 Gy). Dose escalation was possible for 51 out of 57 patients in the DICOM-group. Average escalated dose in DICOM-group was 59.2 ± 6.2 Gy, with an incremental dose of 6.7 ± 12.4 Gy from the baseline prescription. No dose escalation was opted for in the non-DICOM group due to the unavailability of dose volume information from previous radiation. Reirradiation for head and neck cases allowed for a moderate to high dose escalation, facilitated by the presence of pertinent DICOM information from the initial radiotherapy.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach-part I: prognostic factors and indications to treatment

INTRODUCTION

Reirradiation (reRT) of locally recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck region is a potentially curative treatment for patients not candidate to salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize available literature on both prognostic factors and indications to curative reRT in this clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was performed on two topics: (1) patients' selection according to prognostic factors and (2) dosimetric feasibility of reRT. Postoperative reRT and palliative intent treatments were out of the scope of this work.

RESULTS

Patient-tumor and treatment-related prognostic factors were analyzed, together with dosimetric parameters concerning target volume and organs at risk. Based on available evidence, a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to identify suitable candidates for curative reRT in clinical practice. This was then applied to two clinical cases, proposed at the end of this work.

CONCLUSION

A second course of RT in head and neck recurrence/second primary tumors is a personalized approach that can be offered to selected patients only in centers with expertise and dedicated equipment following a multidisciplinary team discussion.

Proton beam therapy in repeat irradiation of recurrent head and neck tumors: analysis of short-term results

Introduction. Recurrence of head and neck tumors occurs in 50 % of cases and usually has locoregional character. Due to the characteristics of dose distribution, proton beam therapy is a promising treatment option for patients with recurrences of tumors in this location who previously underwent radiation therapy.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of repeat irradiation using active scanning proton beam therapy in patients with recurrent head and neck tumors who previously underwent radiation therapy.

Materials and methods. Between November of 2015 and December of 2020, 40 patients with locoregional recurrence of head and neck tumors underwent treatment using active scanning proton beam therapy at the A. F . Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center. Median cumulative dose of primary irradiation was 64.5 Gy. Median time between primary and repeat irradiation was 35.7 months, mean irradiated volume of the repeat course was 94.5 cm3. Proton beam therapy was performed using standard mode (2 isoGy) and accelerated hypofractionation (2.4 isoGy / 3 isoGy) with mean equivalent cumulative dose of 56.4 Gy (α / β = 10). Radiation toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group European (RTOG) / Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scale.

Results. Treatment response was achieved in 34 (85 %) patients: in 17 (42.5 %) patients, stable disease was observed; in 10 (25 %) patients, partial response was observed; and in 7 (17.5 %) patients, complete response was observed. In 6 (15 %) cases, disease progression was diagnosed at first follow-up examination. One- and two-year locoregional control, progression-free survival and overall survival were 58.4 / 19.8; 44.5 / 19.8 and 82.3 / 38.8 % respectively with median follow-up duration of 14.2 months. Median survival was 19.5 months. Grade III and above early radiation toxicity was observed in 3 (7.5 %) patients. In total, 6 (15 %) cases of grade III complications and 2 (5 %) episodes of carotid artery rupture leading to death were observed. Overall frequency of complications of grade III and higher was 20 %.

Conclusion. Repeat irradiation using proton beam therapy can be considered an effective and safe treatment method for patients with recurrent head and neck tumors. Dosimetric and radiobiological benefits of proton beams allow to achieve balance between high doses and radiation exposure in previously irradiated tissues.

Reirradiation for local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers: a multi-institutional study

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation in patients with locally recurrent oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers. We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 129 patients with previously irradiated cancer. The most frequent primary sites were the nasopharynx (43.4%), oral cavity (24.8%), and oropharynx (18.6%). With a median follow-up duration of 10.6 months, the median overall survival was 14.4 months and the 2-year overall survival rate was 40.6%. For each primary site, the 2-year overall survival rates were 32.1%, 34.6%, 30%, 60.8%, and 5.7% for the hypopharynx, oral cavity, larynx, nasopharynx, and oropharynx, respectively. Prognostic factors for overall survival were primary site (nasopharynx versus other sites) and gross tumor volume (GTV) (≤ 25 cm³ versus > 25 cm³). The 2-year local control rate was 41.2%. Twenty-four patients (18.6%) presented with grade ≥ 3 toxicities, including nine with hemorrhages that led to grade 5 toxicities in seven patients. All nine tumors that caused hemorrhage showed tumor encasement of the carotid ≥ 180 degrees and eight of nine tumors had larger GTV > 25 cm³. Reirradiation is a feasible treatment option for small local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, with the requirement of a strict eligibility assessment for large tumors with carotid encasement.

Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice.

METHODS

We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.

Salvage brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in previously irradiated areas: carcinologic and toxicity outcomes of 25 patients

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of salvage brachytherapy for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in previously irradiated areas.

Material and methods

This was a retrospective study with 25 patients, treated between 1997 and 2016 for primary (21 cases) or recurrent (4 cases) oral or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in previously irradiated areas. Fifteen patients were treated with salvage brachytherapy (BT) alone, while 10 patients additionally received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Median BT dose was 45 Gy (range, 15-64 Gy), and a median total cumulative dose was 57 Gy (range, 40-70 Gy). Patient age, tumor stage, radiotherapy dose, and time between first treatment and recurrence were analyzed as prognostic factors.

Results

Median overall survival (OS) was 16 months. Patients with less advanced (T1) tumors survived significantly longer (27 vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.046). Five patients experienced a local recurrence, and only one of them was treated with a total dose greater than 60 Gy. In multivariate analysis, patients with T1 lesions had a significant higher OS rate compared to patients with larger lesions (HR = 6.25, 95% CI: 1.18-33.1%, p = 0.031). Patients who received more than 60 Gy had a non-significant, 80% increased OS than those treated with a lower dose (p = 0.072). There was four grade 3 acute toxicities, and no grade 3 or more late toxicities.

Conclusions

Multimodal treatment, including salvage BT, may offer a curative option for selected patients with an acceptable risk of severe toxicity for the treatment of primary or recurrent tumors in previously irradiated areas.

Proton re-irradiation of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancers

Background

This study presents a retrospective analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with unresectable recurrence of previously irradiated head and neck (H&N) cancers treated with proton therapy. Locoregional recurrence is the main pattern of failure in the treatment of H&N cancers. Proton re-irradiation in patients with relapse after prior radiotherapy might be valid as promising as a challenging treatment option.

Materials and methods

From November 2015 to January 2020, 30 patients with in-field recurrence of head and neck cancer, who were not suitable for surgery due to medical contraindications, tumor localization, or extent, received re-irradiation with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Sites of retreatment included the aerodigestive tract (60%) and the base of skull (40%). The median total dose of prior radiotherapy was 55.0 Gy. The median time to the second course was 38 months. The median re-irradiated tumor volume was 158.1 cm³. Patients were treated with 2.0, 2.4, and 3.0 GyRBE per fraction, with a median equivalent dose (EQD₂) of 57.6 Gy (α/β = 10). Radiation-induced toxicity was recorded according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria.

Results

The 1- and 2-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 52.6/21.0, 21.9/10.9, and 73.4/8.4%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. The median overall survival was 16 months. Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed in one patient (3.3%). There were five late severe side effects (16.6%), with one death associated with re-irradiation.

Conclusion

Re-irradiation with a proton beam can be considered a safe and efficient treatment even for a group of patients with unresectable recurrent H&N cancers.

Prior chemoradiotherapy and pathological perineural invasion predict the survival outcomes of salvage surgery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of salvage surgery in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all patients of SCCHN with recurrence or second primary, post-treatment, who underwent salvage surgery. The outcomes were analyzed in terms of overall survival, overall survival postsalvage surgery and disease-free survival (DFS) postsalvage surgery. Clinical and pathological predictors were considered.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-one patients were included. The mean follow-up was 56.33 months. Five-year survival OS from date of initial diagnosis of the tumor was 61.2%. The 5-year OS survival after salvage surgery was 47.1%. Five-year DFS after salvage surgery was 28.1%. Prior chemoradiotherapy and pathological perineural invasion were independent predictors on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival outcomes after appropriate salvage treatment are good. Prior chemoradiotherapy and perineural invasion on salvage pathology are predictors of poorer outcomes.

Overlapping volumes in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer - an important factor for patient selection

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus concerning the definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes in head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of the present study is to introduce a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume that might better predict the risk of serious side-effects from treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive patients re-irradiated for HNC cancer were retrospectively analysed. CT images were deformably registered and the dose distributions accumulated after conversion to EQD2. Patients with a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in the overlapping volume (V100) were included in the study. Survival data and radiation-related acute and late toxicities were recorded.

RESULTS

The overall survival of all included patients at 2 and 5 years was 42.6 and 27.3% respectively and the progression free survival at 2 and 5 years was 32.5 and 28.5% respectively. The overall rate of any event of severe (grade ≥ 3) acute and late toxicity was 26 and 51%, respectively. We found that severe acute toxicity was more common in patients who had a larger overlapping volume (V100 > mean) where 43% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, compared to the patients with smaller overlapping volumes (V100 < mean) where only 11% had severe toxicity (p = 0.02). The seemingly high rates of late toxicity in the present study could be due to the use of a more strict definition of re-irradiation. In previous studies also patients with low dose overlap are included and our results imply that there is a risk that previous studies might have overestimated the risk-benefit ratio in re-irradiation of HNC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study describes the outcome of a patient material where a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume is used. With this definition, which could better describe the volume of highest risk for serious complications, we found that larger such overlapping volumes result in an increase in severe acute side-effects. A clear definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes is of utmost importance for future studies of HNC to make results from different studies comparable.

Is It Worth It? Consequences of Definitive Head and Neck Reirradiation

Locally recurrent head and neck malignancies after definitive radiation or chemoradiation represent challenging clinical scenarios requiring careful consideration of individualized risks and benefits before deciding upon the next best course of therapy. Herein, a case-based approach to personalized decision making highlights the expert opinions of leaders in head and neck oncology. Topics of interest include optimal candidacy for reirradiation or salvage surgical resection, the judicious use of chemotherapy as induction therapy or as a radiosensitizing agent, the incorporation of immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm for locally recurrent disease, and the impact of various treatment modalities on quality of life and functional outcomes. Interestingly, the lack of consensus among the experts on topics as fundamental as the appropriateness of offering reirradiation at all and as nuanced as target volume delineation for the reirradiated field suggests that there is no straightforward approach in this scenario. Common to all opinions is a desire to maximize the therapeutic ratio for a patient potentially facing a grim prognosis, and honest discussions about goals of care and expectations for post-treatment quality of life should be central to the clinical approach to this and similar cases.

Final results of a multi-institutional phase II trial of reirradiation with concurrent weekly cisplatin and cetuximab for recurrent or second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background

The optimal regimen of chemotherapy and reirradiation (re-XRT) for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is controversial. We report the final outcomes of a multicenter phase II trial evaluating cetuximab and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with re-XRT for patients with recurrent HNSCC.

Materials and methods

Patients with unresectable recurrent disease or positive margins after salvage surgery arising within a previously irradiated field with KPS ≥ 70 were eligible for this trial. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 was delivered as a loading dose in week 1 followed by weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 concurrent with 6 weeks of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to a dose of 60-66 Gy in 30 daily fractions. Patients who previously received both concurrent cetuximab and cisplatin with radiation or who received radiotherapy less than 6 months prior were ineligible.

Results

From 2009 to 2013, 48 patients enrolled on this trial, 2 did not receive any protocol treatment. Of the remaining 46 patients, 34 were male and 12 female, with a median age of 62 years (range 36-85). Treatment was feasible and only 1 patient did not complete the treatment course. Common grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were lymphopenia (46%), pain (22%), dysphagia (13%), radiation dermatitis (13%), mucositis (11%) and anorexia (11%). There were no grade 5 acute toxicities. Eight grade 3 late toxicities were observed, four of which were swallowing related. With a median follow-up of 1.38 years, the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 60.4% and 1-year recurrence-free survival was 34.1%. On univariate analysis, OS was significantly improved with young age (P = 0.01). OS was not associated with radiation dose, surgery before re-XRT or interval from prior XRT.

Conclusions

Concurrent cisplatin and cetuximab with re-XRT is feasible and offers good treatment outcomes for patients with high-risk features. Younger patients had significantly improved OS.

ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier

NCT00833261.

Long-term outcome of re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer: A multi-institutional study of AIRO-Head and Neck working group

BACKGROUND

To report the long-term outcome of patients undergoing re-irradiation (re-RT) for a recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (RSPHNCs) in seven Italian tertiary centers, while testing the Multi-Institution Reirradation (MIRI) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) recently published.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) selected by a random forest model were included in a multivariable Cox analysis. To externally validate MIRI RPA, we estimated the Kaplan-Meier group-stratified OS curves for the whole population.

RESULTS

Five-year OS was 43.5% (median follow-up: 49.9 months). Nasopharyngeal site, no organ dysfunction, and re-RT volume <36 cm³ were independent factors for better OS. By applying the MIRI RPA to our cohort, a Harrell C-Index of 0.526 was found indicating poor discriminative ability.

CONCLUSION

Our data reinforce the survival benefit of Re-RT for selected patients with RSPHNC. MIRI RPA was not validated in our population.

Modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a key role in curative-intent treatments for head and neck cancers. Its use is indicated as a sole therapy in early stage tumors or in combination with surgery or concurrent chemotherapy in advanced stages. Recent technologic advances have resulted in both improved oncologic results and expansion of the indications for RT in clinical practice. Despite this, RT administered to the head and neck region is still burdened by a high rate of acute and late side effects. Moreover, about 50% of patients with high-risk disease experience loco-regional recurrence within 3 years of follow-up. Therefore, in recent decades, efforts have been dedicated to optimize the cost/benefit ratio of RT in this subset of patients. The aim of the present review was to highlight modern concepts of RT for head and neck cancers considering both the technological advances that have been achieved and recent knowledge that has informed the biological interaction between radiation and both tumor and healthy tissues.

AHNS series: Do you know your guidelines? Guideline recommendations for recurrent and persistent head and neck cancer after primary treatment

Locoregional recurrent/persistent head and neck cancer following primary treatment is a significant challenge as it is usually difficult to treat and has worse outcomes compared to the primary setting. Surgical resection of a local or regional recurrence offers the best chance of cure when feasible. Local recurrence outcomes vary by subsite with laryngeal recurrences having the best prognoses and hypopharynx having the worst. Instances of persistent neck masses following primary nonsurgical treatment can be evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET) with CT (PET-CT) when there is no definitive diagnosis of a recurrence/persistence. Reirradiation with or without chemotherapy can be considered for primary treatment when surgery is not an option, for adjuvant treatment following salvage surgery, or for palliation. Immunotherapy represents a newer class of chemotherapeutic agents. Current guidelines recommend enrollment in clinical trials especially when surgery is not an option as outcomes remain universally poor in the recurrent/persistent setting.

The Current Role of Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Chemoradiotherapy has emerged as a gold standard in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Because 50% of advanced stage patients relapse after nonsurgical primary treatment, the role of salvage surgery (SS) is critical because surgery is generally regarded as the best treatment option in patients with recurrent resectable SCCHN. Surgeons are increasingly confronted with considering operation among patients with significant effects of failed non-surgical primary treatment. Wide local excision to achieve clear margins must be balanced with the morbidity of the procedure, the functional consequences of organ mutilation, and the likelihood of success. Accurate selection of patients suitable for surgery is a major issue. It is essential to establish objective criteria based on functional and oncologic outcomes to select the best candidates for SS. The authors propose first to understand preoperative prognostic factors influencing survival. Predictive modeling based on preoperative information is now available to better select patients having a good chance to be successfully treated with surgery. Patients with a high comorbidity index, advanced oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal primary tumors, and both local and regional recurrence have a very limited likelihood of success with salvage surgery and should be strongly considered for other treatments. Following SS, identifying patients with postoperative prognostic factors predicting high risk of recurrence is essential because those patients could benefit of adjuvant treatment or be included in clinical trials. Finally, defining HPV tumor status is needed in future studies including recurrent oropharyngeal SCC patients.

Definitive re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy in cancers of the head and neck, focusing on rare tumors

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcomes following re-irradiation for local recurrence of rare head and neck tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients who had received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for recurrent tumors in the head and neck except for laryngopharynx.

RESULTS

Primary tumor sites included the maxillary sinus, nasal cavity, and external ear canal in six, three, and two patients, respectively. The median follow-up times were 13 (range, 3-54) months. The median survival time was 17 months with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 63.64 and 39.77%, respectively. Among 11 patients, five experienced local failure in the follow-up period. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 58 and 47%, respectively. Patients who had received a radiation dose of ≥3 Gy per fraction showed significantly better local control than those receiving less (p = .0419). One patient experienced Grade 3 facial pain as acute toxicity. Late toxicities included radiographic findings of partial central nervous system necrosis in three patients and Grade 3 osteonecrosis and Grade 3 facial nerve disorder in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation of rare head and neck tumors using IMRT for loco-regional recurrence may be an acceptable treatment option.

Type of second primary malignancy after achieving complete response by definitive chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

While the standard treatment for stage II-III (non-T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy, definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) is an option to treat ESCC patients who reject or may not tolerate surgical treatment. Second primary malignancy (SPM) is a problem for long-term survivors after achieving complete response (CR) by dCRT.

METHODS

The source of the subjects in this study was the patients with stage II/III (excluding T4 disease) ESCC (UICC6th) who underwent dCRT from 2000 to 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. SPM, defined as malignancy newly detected at different site from the initial disease, was checked in patients who achieved CR by the initial dCRT.

RESULTS

Among the 285 patients with stage II/III (excluding T4 disease) ESCC who underwent dCRT, 185 patients achieved CR. SPM was detected in 49 patients (median time to developing SPM, 41.5 months), accounting for 19.3% (95% CI 0.137-0.257) as the 5-year cumulative risk of SPM. SPMs were head and neck cancer (n = 12), gastric cancer (n = 12), esophageal cancer (n = 7), lung cancer (n = 5), colon cancer (n = 4), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 3), bladder cancer (n = 2), small intestinal cancer (n = 1), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), malignant melanoma (n = 1), and breast cancer (n = 1). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the patients who developed SPM (n = 49) and others (n = 136).

CONCLUSIONS

Because second primary malignancy developed often after achieving CR by dCRT for ESCC, it should be followed carefully.

What should we expect from robotic surgery for second primary oropharyngeal cancer?

The outcomes of second primary oropharyngeal cancer (SPOPC) may not be determined by oropharyngeal cancer but from the other index cancer as well. The management of (SPOPC) remains inconclusive and limited. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) to maximize the functional outcomes without reducing oncologic effect is suggested as the primary treatment for selected oropharyngeal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of TORS for the management of SPOPC. Patients who underwent TORS from January 2011 to June 2015 at a tertian referral center in Taiwan were recruited. Loco-regional status, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and postoperative functional status were evaluated. Fifteen patients received TORS for SPOPC with curative intent, including eleven with tongue-base carcinomas, and four with tonsil carcinomas. One case was terminated because of inadequate exposure and the other 14 cases were completed with negative pathologic margins. Two-year OS and DSS were 53 and 77%, respectively. Patients with SPOPC occurring within 6 months had poorer outcomes (p = 0.044). The median time to feeding-tube removal was 5 days, and one patient had long-term gastric-tube dependence. Patients of age <65 years with synchronous SPOPC and esophageal cancer as the other index cancer were significant worse in oncologic outcomes. We concluded that TORS is a feasible alternative treatment in selected patients with SPOPC. Patients with metachronous T1-2 SPOPC without an esophageal primary can achieve excellent survival after TORS, while TORS can maximize functional preservation with limited destruction in patients with low life expectancy.

Reirradiation of head and neck cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: patient selection, practical aspects, and current evidence

Locoregional failure is the most frequent pattern of failure in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients and it leads to death in most of the patients. Second primary tumors occurring in the other head and neck region reach up to almost 40% of long-term survivors. Recommended and preferred retreatment option in operable patients is salvage surgical resection, reporting a 5-year overall survival of up to 40%. However, because of tumor location, extent, and underlying comorbidities, salvage surgery is often limited and compromised by incomplete resection. Reirradiation with or without combined chemotherapy is an appropriate option for unresectable recurrence. Reirradiation is carefully considered with a case-by-case basis. Reirradiation protocol enrollment is highly encouraged prior to committing patient to an aggressive therapy. Radiation doses greater than 60 Gy are usually recommended for successful salvage. Despite recent technical improvement in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the use of concurrent chemotherapy, and the emergence of molecularly targeted agents, careful patient selection remain as the most paramount factor in reirradiation. Tumors that recur or persist despite aggressive prior chemoradiation therapy imply the presence of chemoradio-resistant clonogens. Treatment protocols that combine novel targeted radiosensitizing agents with conformal high precision radiation are required to overcome the resistance while minimizing toxicity. Recent large number of data showed that IMRT may provide better locoregional control with acceptable acute or chronic morbidities. However, additional prospective studies are required before a definitive conclusion can be drawn on safety and effectiveness of IMRT.

Reirradiation of head and neck cancer: Long-term disease control and toxicity

Background

The purpose of this study was to report long‐term disease control and late radiation toxicity for patients reirradiated for head and neck cancer.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 137 patients reirradiated with a prescribed dose ≥45 Gy between 1986 and 2013 for a recurrent or second primary malignancy. Endpoints were locoregional control, overall survival (OS), and grade ≥4 late complications according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria.

Results

Five‐year locoregional control rates were 46% for patients reirradiated postoperatively versus 20% for patients who underwent reirradiation as the primary treatment (p < .05). Sixteen cases of serious (grade ≥4) late toxicity were seen in 11 patients (actuarial 28% at 5 years). In patients reirradiated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), a borderline improved locoregional control was observed (49% vs 36%; p = .07), whereas late complication rates did not differ.

Conclusion

Reirradiation should be considered for patients with a recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer, especially postoperatively, if indicated. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck39: 1122–1130, 2017

What is the role of postoperative re-irradiation in recurrent and second primary squamous cell cancer of head and neck? A literature review according to PICO criteria

Re-irradiation has been increasingly offered as a potential effective treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) loco-regional recurrence as well as second primary tumor in previously irradiated area. This review focused on the role of postoperative re-irradiation (POreRT) in terms of feasibility, toxicity and long-term outcomes in HNSCC patients. The key issue for the research was formulated in two questions according to the PICO (population, intervention, control, and outcomes) criteria. A total of 16 publications met the inclusion criteria for a total of 919 patients; in 522 patients POreRT was performed. POreRT in recurrent and second primary HNSCC seems to be feasible in highly selected patients with the intent to guarantee an acceptable LC compared to surgery alone. The optimal RT schedule remains unclear due to the heterogeneity of literature data.

Reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally recurrent T3 to T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicities of reirradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with consecutive rT3 to rT4 NPC treated between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control rate were 47.2%, 17.5%, and 44.3%, respectively. Gross target volume (GTV) D₉₅ , GTV D₅₀ , and age were all important prognostic factors for OS and PFS, but only GTV D₉₅ was an important determinant for local control. A total of 73.7% patients experienced ≥1 grade 3 late toxicities and 3 patients died of massive epistaxis. Temporal lobe necrosis (TLN) developed sooner with a higher total biological equivalent dose.

CONCLUSION

Adequate tumor dose coverage was important for treating rT3 to rT4 NPC. Although late complications were common, treatment-related mortality was solely vascular in nature. Dose constraints of neurologic structures for reirradiation should be revised with the latest information on late toxicities. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 533-540, 2017.

Patterns of failure after reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and the competing risk of out-of-field recurrences

PURPOSE

To describe patterns of failure (POF) after reirradiation (reRT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for recurrent/second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

From 08/2004-02/2013, 75 consecutive patients received reRT with IMRT. Gross tumor was generally treated with a 5mm planning target volume (PTV) margin. For postoperative cases, a 5mm PTV was added to the clinical target volume which included the postoperative bed. Elective neck coverage was not standard. POF were characterized by correlating the recurrent tumor location on CT-imaging with the reRT IMRT plan.

RESULTS

Patients received definitive reRT (55%) or postoperative reRT (45%) to a median 60Gy (range, 59.4-70Gy). Most patients (88%) received concurrent chemotherapy including induction (16%). The median overall survival was 1.8years. Isolated local-regional recurrence (LRR) was the most common failure-type (2-year cumulative incidence [CI] 22.5% [95% C.I. 13.6-32.7%]), but concurrent LRR and distant-failure occurred frequently (2-year CI LRR+distant-failure 19.6% [95% C.I. 11.3-29.5%]); isolated distant-failure was rare (2-year CI 5.7% [95% C.I. 1.8-12.8%]). The 2-year in-field control was 65% (95% C.I. 52-81%) reflecting encouraging control within the irradiated target. Patients with gross disease were more likely to recur in-field (p=0.02), whereas postoperative patients were more likely to recur out-of-field/marginally than in-field (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

POF after reRT differ when treating gross disease or postoperatively and should be considered when delineating reRT targets. Aggressive local therapy resulted in favorable in-field control, yet there remains a high competing risk of regional and distant micrometastatic disease. Better systemic agents are needed to control clinically occult local-regional and distant disease.

Predictors of severe long-term toxicity after re-irradiation for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictive factors of severe long-term toxicity after re-irradiation of recurrent/persistent or second-primary head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Outcomes and treatment plans of patients who underwent modern IMRT based re-irradiation to the head and neck from 2008-2015 were reviewed. Co-variables including demographic, clinical and oncologic factors, as well as interval to re-irradiation and re-irradiated planning tumor volume (PTV) were analyzed as predictors of developing severe (CTCAE grade⩾3) long-term toxicity with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients who met inclusion criteria were eligible for analysis. A median re-irradiation dose of 70Gy was delivered at a median of 37.5months after initial radiotherapy. Re-irradiation followed surgical resection in 25 (38%) patients, and concurrent chemotherapy was delivered to 41 (62%) patients. Median follow-up after re-irradiation was 23months and median overall survival was 22months (predicted 2year overall survival 49%). Of the 60 patients who survived longer than 3months after re-irradiation, 16 (25%) patients experienced severe long-term toxicity, with the majority (12 of 16) being feeding tube -dependent dysphagia. In multivariable analysis, shorter intervals to re-irradiation (<20months) and larger re-irradiated PTVs (>100cm(3)) were independent predictors of developing severe long-term toxicity. Patients with longer disease-free intervals and smaller PTVs had a 94% probability of being free of severe toxicity at two years.

CONCLUSION

Selection of patients with longer re-irradiation intervals and requiring smaller re-irradiated PTVs can independently predict avoidance of severe long-term toxicity.

Reirradiation using robotic image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of recurrent head and neck cancer

The purpose of this study was to examine the prognosis for patients with head and neck cancer after reirradiation using Cyberknife stereotactic body irradiation with special focus on mucosal ulceration. We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional review of 107 patients with previously irradiated head and neck cancer. The median follow-up time for all patients was 15 months, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 35%. Significant prognostic factors for overall survival were primary site (nasopharynx versus other sites), presence of ulceration, and PTV volume. Detailed analysis of ulceration showed a lower response rate (28%) in the ulceration (+) group than the ulceration (-) group (63%; P = 0.0045). The 2-year overall survival rates were 8% in the ulceration (+) group and 42.7% (P = 0.0001) in the ulceration (-) group, respectively. We recorded 22 severe toxicities, including 11 patients with carotid blow-out syndrome (CBOS), which was fatal in 9 patients. CBOS occurred in 6 patients with ulceration (6/25; 24%), and 5 patients experienced CBOS without ulceration (5/82; 6%; P=0.027). In conclusion, ulceration is an important prognostic factor, not only for adverse events but also for survival after reirradiation using CyberKnife.

Re-irradiation with cetuximab or cisplatin-based chemotherapy for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Locoregional recurrence remains the main pattern of failure after primary combined modality treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We compared the efficacy and toxicity of either cisplatin or cetuximab in combination with re-irradiation (ReRT) for recurrent unresectable SCCHN. Various clinicopathological factors were investigated to establish a prognostic score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2007 and 2014, 66 patients with recurrent SCCHN originating in a previously irradiated area received cetuximab (n = 33) or cisplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 33) concomitant with ReRT. Toxicity was evaluated weekly and at every follow-up visit. Physical examination, endoscopy, CT or MRI scans were used to evaluate response and disease control.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 18.3 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) rates for Re-RT with cetuximab and cisplatin-based chemotherapy were 44.4 and 45.5% (p = 0.352), respectively. At 1 year, local control rates (LCR) were 46.4 and 54.2% (p = 0.625), freedom from metastases (FFM) rates 73.6 and 81% (p = 0.842), respectively. Haematological toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred more often in the cisplatin group (p < 0.001), pain ≥ grade 3 was increased in the cetuximab group (p = 0.034). A physiological haemoglobin level and a longer interval between primary RT and ReRT, proved to be significant prognostic factors for OS (multivariate: p = 0.003, p = 0.002, respectively). Site of the recurrence and gross target volume (GTV) did not show a significant impact on OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.160, p = 0.167, respectively). A prognostic-score (1-4 points) based on these four variables identified significantly different subgroups: 1-year OS for 0/1/2/3/4 prognostic points: 10, 38, 76, 80 and 100%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both cetuximab- and cisplatin-based ReRT of SCCHN recurrences are feasible and effective treatment options with comparable results in terms of tumour control and survival. Acute adverse events may differ slightly. Our prognostic score could help to identify appropriate patients for ReRT and stratify patients within future clinical trials.

AURKA is a predictor of chemotherapy response and prognosis for patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Increasing evidence proposes the benefits of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in a subpopulation of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), yet reliable indicators for this subpopulation are poorly explored. AURKA, also known as aurora kinase A, playing important functions in cell mitosis and making cells resistant to cisplatin through dysregulation of DNA damage repair networks, has been reported to be upregulated in OSCC, making AURKA a promising indicator. In this study, we recruited 78 patients with advanced OSCC to examine the expression of AURKA and the correlation with chemotherapy response and clinical outcomes. We found that AURKA was strongly expressed in 31 (39.74 %) of the 78 advanced OSCC samples and its expression was significantly associated with cisplatin resistance (P = 0.023), clinical recurrence (P = 0.021), and 5-year survival (P = 0.019). Chemotherapy increased AURKA expression in post-chemotherapy samples, yet with no significance (P = 0.101). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis demonstrated that lymph node samples with positive, strong AURKA staining, and poor chemotherapy response were independently associated with the 5-year survival and disease-free survival. Inhibiting AURKA expression in OSCC cell lines remarkably increased their sensitivity to cisplatin treatment by 2.5-fold difference. Our results imply that the overexpression of AURKA in advanced OSCC not only plays a role in the disease course but also shows an involvement in cisplatin treatment response. AURKA level may be a valuable predictor for patients with advanced OSCC, with downregulation of AURKA being a promising adjuvant therapy in this patient population.

FDG volumetric parameters and survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish the predictive value of (18)F-FDG parameters for overall survival in biopsy-proven recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including 34 patients with HNSCC who had biopsy-proven recurrence between April 2004 and March 2012 and underwent FDG PET/CT at our institution at the time of recurrence. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak SUV (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. ROC analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, and Kaplan-Meir survival curves were performed.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, human papillomavirus (HPV) status (p = 0.04), primary site recurrence of MTV (p = 0.03), metastasis of MTV (p = 0.02), metastasis of TLG (p = 0.02), total MTV (p = 0.002), and total TLG (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with overall survival outcome. Total MTV remained as significant independent prognostic factor when adjusted for all other covariates except for primary site recurrence SUVmax and SUVpeak and lymph node SUVmax and SUVpeak. There was a significant difference in time to survival between patients with total MTV above and below the 50th percentile (Mantel-Cox log-rank test, p = 0.05 and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, p = 0.03) and the optimum threshold of 16.8 mL (Mantel-Cox log-rank test, p = 0.01 and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, p = 0.01; hazard ratio [HR], 0.25).

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT-based total MTV and clinical HPV status may be significant prognostic markers for overall survival of patients with recurrent HNSCC after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

High-dose reirradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent head-and-neck cancer: disease control, survival and toxicity

PURPOSE

To evaluate disease control, survival and severe late toxicity after high-dose fractionated reirradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for recurrent head-and-neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients were reirradiated with IMRT between 1997 and 2011. The median prescribed dose was 70 Gy in 35 daily fractions until 2004 and 69.12 Gy in 32 daily fractions thereafter. The median cumulative dose was 132 Gy. Sixty-seven percent of patients had non-metastatic stage IV disease. Surgery prior to reirradiation and concomitant systemic therapy was performed in 13 (22%) and 20 (33%) patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Median follow-up in living patients was 18.5 months. Actuarial 1-, 2- and 5-year locoregional control was 64%, 48% and 32%, respectively. Median overall (OS) and disease-free survival was 9.6 and 6.7 months, respectively. Actuarial 1-, 2- and 5-year OS was 44%, 32% and 22%, respectively. Seventeen (27%) and 2 (3%) patients had grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity, respectively. Cumulative incidence of late grade≥3 toxicity was 23%, 27% and 66% at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. In 4 patients, death was attributed to toxicity: fatal bleeding (n=2), aspiration pneumonia (n=1) and skin necrosis (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose fractionated reirradiation with IMRT offers 5-year disease control and OS in recurrent head-and-neck cancer for 1/3 and 1/4 patients, respectively. Severe late toxicity after 1-2 and 5 years occurs in 1/4 and 2/3 patients, respectively.

Recurrent and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: when and how to reirradiate

BACKGROUND

Local and/or regional recurrence and metachronous primary tumor arising in a previously irradiated area are rather frequent events in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Re-treatment is associated with an increased risk of serious toxicity and impaired quality of life (QOL) with an uncertain survival advantage.

METHODS

We analyzed the literature on the efficacy and toxicity of photon/electron-based external beam reirradiation for previously irradiated patients with HNSCC of non-nasopharyngeal origin. Studies were grouped according to the radiotherapy technique used for reirradiation. Patient selection criteria, target volume identification method, tumor dose, fractionation schedule, systemic therapy administration, and toxicities were reviewed.

RESULTS

In addition to disease-related factors, current comorbidities and preexisting organ dysfunction must be considered when selecting patients for reirradiation. As morbidity from re-treatment may be considerable and differ depending on which mode of re-treatment is used, it is important to give patients information on potential morbidity outcomes so that an informed choice can be made within a shared decision-making context. With improved dose distribution and adequate imaging support, including positron emission tomography-CT, modern radiotherapy techniques may improve local control and reduce toxicity of reirradiation. A reirradiation dose of ≥60 Gy and a volume encompassing the gross tumor with up to a 5-mm margin are recommended. Concomitant administration of systemic therapeutics and reirradiation is likely to be of similar benefit as observed in large randomized studies of upfront therapy.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation, administered either with or without concurrent systemic therapy, is feasible and tolerable in properly selected patients with recurrent or a new primary tumor in a previously irradiated area of the head and neck, offering a meaningful survival (in the range of 10% to 30% at 2 years). Whenever feasible, salvage surgery is the method of choice for curative intent; patients at high-risk for local recurrence should be advised that postoperative reirradiation is expected to increase locoregional control at the expense of higher toxicity and without survival advantage compared to salvage surgery without reirradiation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 134-150, 2015.

The role of re-irradiation of secondary and recurrent head and neck carcinomas. Is it a potentially curative treatment? A practical approach

Despite aggressive efforts to cure head and neck cancer patients, including altered fractionation and the addition of chemotherapy to radiation, locoregional recurrence remains a serious issue to face in clinical practice. Indeed, recurrent and second primary tumors occurring in previously irradiated area are common clinical challenge. Whenever possible, patients are advised to undergo salvage surgery. Nevertheless, few patients are suitable candidates for curative resection. In such cases, chemotherapy alone has traditionally been considered, with a poor response rate. It has been questioned whether re-irradiation toxicity outweighs the potential benefits, considering that the median survival of re-irradiated patients marginally exceeds the benefits observed with chemotherapy alone. However, full-dose re-irradiation is a viable treatment option, offering long-term survival for selected patients. Moreover, several prognostic factors should be considered for patients undergoing re-irradiation, such as basic patient characteristics, performance status, the location and extension of recurrent disease, patient co-morbidities, current speech and swallowing function, the interval from the initial radiation therapy to recurrence, previously received doses by critical structures and prior treatment toxicity. Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the major issues in the field of re-irradiation regarding the current evidence. Therefore, the major selection criteria and new treatment strategies are discussed to define the ideal candidates to undergo re-irradiation and describe a practical approach to these patients. Given the limited evidence in this field, the optimal treatment of recurrent and second primary cancers remains to be defined. Future prospective study of this approach is warranted.

Decision making in the management of recurrent head and neck cancer

Despite substantial improvements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment, the major obstacle to long-term survival remains disease recurrence. Salvage options are often limited due to prior therapy and the escalated morbidity of retreatment. The costs of treatment must be measured against the anticipated quality and quantity of life recovered, even with resectable disease. This review surveys the recurrent HNSCC literature to better guide decision making. Across multiple studies, negative prognostic factors include impaired performance status, advanced recurrent stage, brief disease-free interval, previous chemotherapy, and nonlaryngeal sites of recurrence. When possible, surgical salvage remains the principal option for durable disease control, quality of life preservation, and cure. Nonsurgical therapies have also demonstrated measurable improvements in locoregional control. Interpretation of salvage literature must be tempered by recognition of significant selection bias. The decision for salvage therapy must be individualized, with management that involves well-informed patients resulting in the best outcomes.