1
|
Murimwa GZ, Karalis JD, Meier J, Yan J, Zhu H, Hester CA, Porembka MR, Wang SC, Mansour JC, Zeh HJ, Yopp AC, Polanco PM. Hospital Designations and Their Impact on Guideline-Concordant Care and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Do They Matter? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4377-4387. [PMID: 36964844 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13308-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) requires complex multidisciplinary care. European evidence suggests potential benefit from regionalization, however, data characterizing the ideal setting in the United States are sparse. Our study compares the significance of four hospital designations on guideline-concordant care (GCC) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS The Texas Cancer Registry was queried for 17,071 patients with PDAC treated between 2004 and 2015. Clinical data were correlated with hospital designations: NCI designated (NCI), high volume (HV), safety net (SNH), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accredited (ACS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression were used to assess associations with GCC [on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations]. Cox regression analysis assessed survival. RESULTS Only 43% of patients received GCC. NCI had the largest associated risk reduction (HR 0.61, CI 0.58-0.65), followed by HV (HR 0.87, CI 0.83-0.90) and ACS (HR 0.91, CI 0.87-0.95). GCC was associated with a survival benefit in the full (HR 0.75, CI 0.69-0.81) and resected cohort (HR 0.74, CI 0.68-0.80). NCI (OR 1.52, CI 1.37-1.70), HV (OR 1.14, CI 1.05-1.23), and SNH (OR 0.78, CI 0.68-0.91) all correlated with receipt of GCC. For resected patients, ACS (OR 0.63, CI 0.50-0.79) and SNH (OR 0.50, CI 0.33-0.75) correlate with GCC. CONCLUSIONS A total of 43% of patients received GCC. Treatment at NCI and HV correlated with improved GCC and survival. Including GCC as a metric in accreditation standards could impact survival for patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert Z Murimwa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John D Karalis
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jennie Meier
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jingsheng Yan
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Caitlin A Hester
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew R Porembka
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sam C Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John C Mansour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Adam C Yopp
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu J, Fu C, Wang RS, Geynisman DM, Ghatalia P, Lynch SM, Harrison SR, Tagai EK, Ragin C. Current Status and Future Direction to Address Disparities in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Prostate Cancer Care. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:699-708. [PMID: 37010786 PMCID: PMC10068208 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01399-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Disparities in prostate cancer care and outcomes have been well recognized for decades. The purpose of this review is to methodically highlight known racial disparities in the care of prostate cancer patients, and in doing so, recognize potential strategies for overcoming these disparities moving forward. RECENT FINDINGS Over the past few years, there has been a growing recognition and push towards addressing disparities in cancer care. This has led to improvements in care delivery trends and a narrowing of racial outcome disparities, but as we highlight in the following review, there is more to be addressed before we can fully close the gap in prostate cancer care delivery. While disparities in prostate cancer care are well recognized in the literature, they are not insurmountable, and progress has been made in identifying areas for improvement and potential strategies for closing the care gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry Fu
- Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chen Fu
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schwartzberg L, Broder MS, Ailawadhi S, Beltran H, Blakely LJ, Budd GT, Carr L, Cecchini M, Cobb P, Kansal A, Kim A, Monk BJ, Wong DJ, Campos C, Yermilov I. Impact of early detection on cancer curability: A modified Delphi panel study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0279227. [PMID: 36542647 PMCID: PMC9770338 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Expert consensus on the potential benefits of early cancer detection does not exist for most cancer types. We convened 10 practicing oncologists using a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel to evaluate which of 20 solid tumors, representing >40 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-identified cancer types and 80% of total cancer incidence, would receive potential clinical benefits from early detection. Pre-meeting, experts estimated how long cancers take to progress and rated the current curability and benefit (improvement in curability) of an annual hypothetical multi-cancer screening blood test. Post-meeting, experts rerated all questions. Cancers had varying estimates of the potential benefit of early cancer detection depending on estimates of their curability and progression by stage. Cancers rated as progressing quickly and being curable in earlier stages (stomach, esophagus, lung, urothelial tract, melanoma, ovary, sarcoma, bladder, cervix, breast, colon/rectum, kidney, uterus, anus, head and neck) were estimated to be most likely to benefit from a hypothetical screening blood test. Cancer types rated as progressing quickly but having comparatively lower cure rates in earlier stages (liver/intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, pancreas) were estimated to have medium likelihood of benefit from a hypothetical screening blood test. Cancer types rated as progressing more slowly and having higher curability regardless of stage (prostate, thyroid) were estimated to have limited likelihood of benefit from a hypothetical screening blood test. The panel concluded most solid tumors have a likelihood of benefit from early detection. Even among difficult-to-treat cancers (e.g., pancreas, liver/intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder), early-stage detection was believed to be beneficial. Based on the panel consensus, broad coverage of cancers by screening blood tests would deliver the greatest potential benefits to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Schwartzberg
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Renown Institute for Cancer, Reno, Nevada, United States of America
| | - Michael S. Broder
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America
| | - Sikander Ailawadhi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Divisions of Genitourinary Oncology and Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - L. Johnetta Blakely
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - G. Thomas Budd
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Laurie Carr
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Michael Cecchini
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Patrick Cobb
- Oncology Research, Intermountain Healthcare, Billings, Montana, United States of America
| | - Anuraag Kansal
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., currently held separate from Illumina Inc. under the terms of the Interim Measures Order of the European Commission dated 29 October 2021, Menlo Park, California, United States of America
| | - Ashley Kim
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina Inc., currently held separate from Illumina Inc. under the terms of the Interim Measures Order of the European Commission dated 29 October 2021, Menlo Park, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Deborah J. Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Cynthia Campos
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America
| | - Irina Yermilov
- Partnership for Health Analytic Research (PHAR), LLC, Beverly Hills, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González Serrano A, Martínez Tapia C, de la Taille A, Mongiat-Artus P, Irani J, Bex A, Paillaud E, Audureau E, Barnay T, Laurent M, Canouï-Poitrine F. Adherence to Treatment Guidelines and Associated Survival in Older Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4694. [PMID: 34572921 PMCID: PMC8468518 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The guidelines on prostate cancer treatment in older men recommend evaluating the patient's underlying health status before treatment selection. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of a guideline-discordant treatment (GDT), identify factors associated with GDT, and assess the relationship between GDT and overall survival. We studied patients with prostate cancer aged 70 or older included in the ELCAPA cohort between 2010 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression assessed GDT-associated factors. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) assessed the 24- and 36-month OS using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores. We included 356 patients (median age: 81 years), and 164 (46%) received a GDT (95% confidence interval (CI) = (41-51%)). Patients with metastases were less likely to receive a GDT (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) = 0.34 (0.17-0.69); p = 0.003). After weighting, the RMST at 24 months was shorter in the GDT group (13.9 months, vs. 17 months for compliant treatments; difference (95% CI): -3.1 months (-5.3, -1.0); p = 0.004). RMST at 36 months was 18.5 months, vs. 21.8 months (difference: -3.3 months (-6.7, 0.0); p = 0.053). GDT is common in older patients with prostate cancer and especially those with non-metastatic disease. GDT was associated with worse survival, independently of health status and tumour characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolfo González Serrano
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
| | - Claudia Martínez Tapia
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
| | - Alexandre de la Taille
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
- Department of Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, F-94010 Creteil, France
| | - Pierre Mongiat-Artus
- Université de Paris, INSERM UMR_S1165, F-75010 Paris, France;
- Department of Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Jacques Irani
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris Saclay, F-94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France;
- Department of Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Bicêtre, F-94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Axel Bex
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2QG, UK;
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Elena Paillaud
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
- Department of Geriatrics, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, F-75006 Paris, France
- Faculty of Health, Univeristé de Paris, F-75006 Paris, France
| | - Etienne Audureau
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
- Department of Public Health, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, F-94010 Creteil, France
| | - Thomas Barnay
- ERUDITE Research Unit, Univ Paris Est Creteil, F-94010 Créteil, France;
| | - Marie Laurent
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, F-94010 Creteil, France
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France; (C.M.T.); (A.d.l.T.); (E.P.); (E.A.); (M.L.); (F.C.-P.)
- Department of Public Health, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, F-94010 Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vyfhuis MA, Suzuki I, Bentzen SM, Cullen KJ, Goloubeva OG. Adherence to Guideline-Concordant Care and Its Effect on Survival in Black Patients with Head and Neck Cancers: A SEER-Medicare Analysis. Oncologist 2021; 26:579-587. [PMID: 33783061 PMCID: PMC8265350 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), Black patients continue to have worse survival when compared with White patients. The cause of this disparity is multifaceted and cannot be explained by one etiology alone. To investigate this disparity, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database to examine adherence to guideline-concordant care (GCC) as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with nonmetastatic HNSCC as their first cancer between 1992 and 2011 and a random sample of Medicare controls matched to cases (2:1) diagnosed between 2004 and 2011 (n = 16,378), were included in this analysis. RESULTS Black patients were less likely to receive GCC in advanced-stage oropharyngeal (66% vs. 74%; p = .007) and oral cavity (56% vs. 71%; p = .002) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). On multivariate analysis, Black patients demonstrated an increased risk of death in advanced oropharyngeal (p < .001), oral cavity (p = .01), and hypopharyngeal (p = .01) SCC. CONCLUSION Black patients did not consistently receive GCC across HNSCC subsites, contributing to the poorer outcomes seen when compared with White patients. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms behind the non-GCC given to Black patients with HNSCC and other factors that may contribute to this disparity such as tumor biology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Black patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) continue to have worse survival than White patients. This study examined if the racial disparity in survival from curable HNC is affected by adherence to guideline-concordant care (GCC). It was discovered that Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate treatment in certain HNCs. Although adherence to proper therapy was associated with improved survival in patients with HNC, the difference in survival, where Black patients had inferior outcomes, remained. This analysis uncovered a major contributor to the disparity seen in patients with HNC. As such, cancer centers serving a predominantly Black population with HNC can design specific clinical interventions to ensure GCC for all patients, potentially improving outcomes for everyone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A.L. Vyfhuis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Chesapeake Oncology and Hematology Associates/Tate Cancer CenterGlen BurnieMarylandUSA
| | - Ikumi Suzuki
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Soren M. Bentzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Kevin J. Cullen
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Olga G. Goloubeva
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Jager E, Levine AA, Udyavar NR, Burstin HR, Bhulani N, Hoyt DB, Ko CY, Weissman JS, Britt LD, Haider AH, Maggard-Gibbons MA. Disparities in Surgical Access: A Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Model, and Evidence Map. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 228:276-298. [PMID: 30803548 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elzerie de Jager
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Adele A Levine
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - N Rhea Udyavar
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Nizar Bhulani
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Surgery, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - L D Britt
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Adil H Haider
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Melinda A Maggard-Gibbons
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perrot E, Seddik S, Gourtaud G, Eyraud R, Roux V, Moureaux C, Blanchet P, Brureau L. Biopsy Grade Group as a reliable prognostic factor for BCR in Afro-Caribbean men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 38:1493-1499. [PMID: 31485740 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02931-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Grade Group (GG) classification is recommended by guidelines as a reliable prognostic factor of prostate cancer. However, most studies have been performed on the Caucasian population. Our objective was to validate GG classification as a safe way to classify intermediate- and high-risk patients with African ancestry. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study in an Afro-Caribbean population. A total of 1236 patients were included between 2000 and 2015. Patients were stratified according to (GG). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox model. RESULTS There was no significant difference at 5 and 10-year BCR-free survival between the intermediate- and high-risk groups, based on the D'Amico classification. There was a highly significant difference in BCR-free survival at 5 (p < 0.0001) and 10 years (p < 0.0001) for patients of GG 1 and 2 vs 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year BCR-free survival of patients of GG grades 1 and 2, whether lymph-node dissection was performed or not. There was a significant difference between GG 2 and 3 patients in 5 (p = 0.008) and 10-year BCR-free survival (p = 0.01). High PSA (p < 0.0001), pathological GG ≥ 3 (p < 0.0001), pathological stage pT3 (p < 0.0001) and positive margins (p < 0.0001) were factors for BCR in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION The GG 2015 classification appears to be a better prognostic factor than D'Amico classification for intermediate- and high-risk Afro-Caribbean patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Perrot
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Sofiane Seddik
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Gilles Gourtaud
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Rémi Eyraud
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Virginie Roux
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Clément Moureaux
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France.,CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Pointe-a-Pitre, France
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Service d'Urologie, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, 97159, Pointe-a-Pitre, France. .,CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Pointe-a-Pitre, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Contemporary prostate cancer radiation therapy in the United States: Patterns of care and compliance with quality measures. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:307-316. [PMID: 30177030 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality measures represent the standards of appropriate treatment agreed upon by experts in the field and often supported by data. The extent to which providers in the community adhere to quality measures in radiation therapy (RT) is unknown. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study enrolled men with clinically localized prostate cancer in 2011 and 2012. Patients completed surveys and medical records were reviewed. Patients were risk-stratified according to D'Amico classification criteria. Patterns of care and compliance with 8 quality measures as endorsed by national consortia as of 2011 were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 926 men underwent definitive RT (69% external beam radiation therapy [EBRT]), 17% brachytherapy (BT), and 14% combined EBRT and BT with considerable variation in radiation techniques across risk groups. Most men who received EBRT had dose-escalated EBRT (>75 Gy; 93%) delivered with conventional fractionation (<2 Gy; 95%), intensity modulated RT (76%), and image guided RT (85%). Most men treated with BT received I125 (77%). Overall, 73% of the men received EBRT that was compliant with the quality measures (dose-escalation, image-guidance, appropriate use of androgen deprivation therapy, and appropriate treatment target) but only 60% of men received BT that was compliant with quality measures (postimplant dosimetry and appropriate dose). African-American men (64%) and other minorities (62%) were less likely than white men (77%) to receive EBRT that was compliant with quality measures. CONCLUSIONS Most men who received RT for localized prostate cancer were treated with an appropriately high dose and received image guidance and intensity modulated RT. However, compliance with some nationally recognized quality measures was relatively low and varied by race. There are significant opportunities to improve the delivery of RT and especially for men of a minority race.
Collapse
|
9
|
Allott EH, Farnan L, Steck SE, Song L, Arab L, Su LJ, Fontham ETH, Mohler JL, Bensen JT. Statin use, high cholesterol and prostate cancer progression; results from HCaP-NC. Prostate 2018; 78:857-864. [PMID: 29717502 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statin use is associated with lower advanced prostate cancer risk and reduced prostate cancer-specific mortality, but prior studies were conducted mainly in white men. We examined the effect of statin use on risk of prostate cancer progression in a population-based, minority-enriched cohort. METHODS We used data from prostate cancer cases (45% African American) diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 who participated in the Health Care Access and Prostate Cancer Treatment in North Carolina cohort (HCaP-NC). We abstracted statin use at diagnosis. Men reported if they had ever been diagnosed with high cholesterol. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine associations between statin use and risk of prostate cancer progression (biochemical recurrence or secondary treatment), overall and by race. In secondary analysis, we examined the association between high cholesterol and risk of progression, overall, and by statin use. RESULTS Of 669 men, 244 (36%) were statin users at diagnosis. During 3.8 years median follow-up, 138 men experienced prostate cancer progression. There was no association between statin use and risk of progression, either overall (HR 1.03; 95%CI 0.72-1.46) or stratified by race. High cholesterol was inversely associated with risk of progression, particularly among statin users (HR 0.43; 95%CI 0.20-0.94; p-interaction = 0.22) and in men with higher perceived access to care (HR 0.57; 95%CI 0.36-0.90; p-interaction = 0.03). Study limitations included a relatively small sample size, short follow-up, and lack of data regarding post diagnosis statin use. CONCLUSIONS Statin use at diagnosis was not associated with prostate cancer progression in the population-based, minority-enriched HCaP-NC. Greater healthcare engagement, including actively controlling serum cholesterol, may be linked to better prostate cancer-specific outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma H Allott
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura Farnan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Susan E Steck
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Lixin Song
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lenore Arab
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - L Joseph Su
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute and College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Elizabeth T H Fontham
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - James L Mohler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burdelski C, Borcherding L, Kluth M, Hube-Magg C, Melling N, Simon R, Möller-Koop C, Weigand P, Minner S, Haese A, Michl HU, Tsourlakis MC, Jacobsen F, Hinsch A, Wittmer C, Lebok P, Steurer S, Izbicki JR, Sauter G, Krech T, Büscheck F, Clauditz T, Schlomm T, Wilczak W. Family with sequence similarity 13C (FAM13C) overexpression is an independent prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 8:31494-31508. [PMID: 28415558 PMCID: PMC5458224 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
FAM13C, a gene with unknown function is included in several mRNA signatures for prostate cancer aggressiveness. To understand the impact of FAM13C on prognosis and its relationship to molecularly defined subsets, we analyzed FAM13C expression by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray containing 12,400 prostate cancer specimens. Results were compared to phenotype, ERG status, genomic deletions of 3p, 5q, 6q and PTEN, and biochemical recurrence. FAM13C was detectable in cell nuclei of cancerous and non-neoplastic prostate cells. 67.5% of 9,633 interpretable cancers showed FAM13C expression: strong in 28.3%, moderate in 24.6% and weak in 14.6%. Strong FAM13C expression was linked to advanced pT stage, high Gleason grade, positive lymph node status, and early biochemical recurrence (p < 0.0001 each). FAM13C expression was associated with TMPRSS2:ERG fusions. It was present in 85% of ERG positive but in only 54% of ERG negative cancers (p < 0.0001), and in 91.1% of PTEN deleted but in only 69.2% of PTEN non-deleted cancers (p < 0.0001). The prognostic role of FAM13C expression was independent of classical and quantitative Gleason grade, pT stage, pN stage, surgical margin status and preoperative PSA. In conclusion, the results of our study demonstrate that expression of FAM13C is an independent prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Finding FAM13C also in non-neoplastic prostate tissues highlights the importance of properly selecting cancer-rich areas for RNA-based FAM13C expression analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Burdelski
- General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Laura Borcherding
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Nathaniel Melling
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Weigand
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Hans Uwe Michl
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany
| | | | - Frank Jacobsen
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Hinsch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Corinna Wittmer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Patrick Lebok
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Till Krech
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Franziska Büscheck
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Till Clauditz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Urology, Section for Translational Prostate Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Waldemar Wilczak
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jacobsen F, Taskin B, Melling N, Sauer C, Wittmer C, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Simon R, Pehrke D, Beyer B, Steuber T, Thederan I, Sauter G, Schlomm T, Wilczak W, Möller K, Weidemann SA, Burdak-Rothkamm S. Increased ERCC1 expression is linked to chromosomal aberrations and adverse tumor biology in prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:504. [PMID: 28747165 PMCID: PMC5530529 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Animal model experiments have suggested a role of the DNA repair protein ERCC1 (Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1) in prostate cancer progression. METHODS To better understand the impact of ERCC1 protein expression in human prostate cancer, a preexisting tissue microarray (TMA) containing more than 12,000 prostate cancer specimens was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and data were compared with tumor phenotype, PSA recurrence and several of the most common genomic alterations (TMPRSS2:ERG fusions: deletions of PTEN, 6q, 5q, 3p). RESULTS ERCC1 staining was seen in 64.7% of 10,436 interpretable tissues and was considered weak in 37.1%, moderate in 22.6% and strong in 5% of tumors. High-level ERCC1 staining was linked to advanced pT stage, high Gleason grade, positive lymph nodes, high pre-operative serum PSA, and positive surgical margin status (p < 0.0001 each). High ERCC1 expression was strongly associated with an elevated risk of PSA recurrence (p < 0.0001). This was independent of established prognostic features. A subgroup analysis of cancers defined by comparable quantitative Gleason grades revealed that the prognostic impact was mostly driven by low-grade tumors with a Gleason 3 + 3 or 3 + 4 (Gleason 4: ≤5%). High ERCC1 expression was strongly associated with the presence of genomic alterations and expression levels increased with the number of deletions present in the tumor. These latter data suggest a functional relationship of ERCC1 expression with genomic instability. CONCLUSION The results of our study demonstrate that expression of ERCC1 - a potential surrogate for genomic instability - is an independent prognostic marker in prostate cancer with particular importance in low-grade tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Jacobsen
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Billurvan Taskin
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nathaniel Melling
- General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Sauer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Wittmer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Dirk Pehrke
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Beyer
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Imke Thederan
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, Section for translational Prostate Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Waldemar Wilczak
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Möller
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sören A Weidemann
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cobran EK, Chen RC, Overman R, Meyer AM, Kuo TM, O'Brien J, Sturmer T, Sheets NC, Goldin GH, Penn DC, Godley PA, Carpenter WR. Racial Differences in Diffusion of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. Am J Mens Health 2016; 10:399-407. [PMID: 25657192 PMCID: PMC4570865 DOI: 10.1177/1557988314568184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), an innovative treatment option for prostate cancer, has rapidly diffused over the past decade. To inform our understanding of racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment and outcomes, this study compared diffusion of IMRT in African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) prostate cancer patients during the early years of IMRT diffusion using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. A retrospective cohort of 947 AA and 10,028 CA patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2002 through 2006, who were treated with either IMRT or non-IMRT as primary treatment within 1 year of diagnoses was constructed. Logistic regression was used to examine potential differences in diffusion of IMRT in AA and CA patients, while adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical covariates. A significantly smaller proportion of AA compared with CA patients received IMRT for localized prostate cancer (45% vs. 53%, p < .0001). Racial differences were apparent in multivariable analysis though did not achieve statistical significance, as time and factors associated with race (socioeconomic, geographic, and tumor related factors) explained the preponderance of variance in use of IMRT. Further research examining improved access to innovative cancer treatment and technologies is essential to reducing racial disparities in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewan K Cobran
- University of Georgia, College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Ronald C Chen
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Anne-Marie Meyer
- UNC, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tzy-Mey Kuo
- UNC, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jonathon O'Brien
- UNC, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Til Sturmer
- UNC, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nathan C Sheets
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gregg H Goldin
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Dolly C Penn
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paul A Godley
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gandaglia G, Bray F, Cooperberg MR, Karnes RJ, Leveridge MJ, Moretti K, Murphy DG, Penson DF, Miller DC. Prostate Cancer Registries: Current Status and Future Directions. Eur Urol 2016; 69:998-1012. [PMID: 26056070 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Disease-specific registries that enroll a considerable number of patients play a major role in prostate cancer (PCa) research. OBJECTIVE To evaluate available registries, describe their strengths and limitations, and discuss the potential future role of PCa registries in outcomes research. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a literature review of the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy included the terms prostate cancer, outcomes, statistical approaches, population-based cohorts, registries of outcomes, and epidemiological studies, alone or in combination. We limited our search to studies published between January 2005 and January 2015. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Several population-based and prospective disease-specific registries are currently available for prostate cancer. Studies performed using these data sources provide important information on incidence and mortality, disease characteristics at presentation, risk factors, trends in utilization of health care services, disparities in access to treatment, quality of care, long-term oncologic and health-related quality of life outcomes, and costs associated with management of the disease. Although data from these registries have some limitations, statistical methods are available that can address certain biases and increase the internal and external validity of such analyses. In the future, improvements in data quality, collection of tissue samples, and the availability of data feedback to health care providers will increase the relevance of studies built on population-based and disease-specific registries. CONCLUSIONS The strengths and limitations of PCa registries should be carefully considered when planning studies using these databases. Although randomized controlled trials still provide the highest level of evidence, large registries play an important and growing role in advancing PCa research and care. PATIENT SUMMARY Several population-based and prospective disease-specific registries for prostate cancer are currently available. Analyses of data from these registries yield information that is clinically relevant for the management of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Freddie Bray
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Departments of Urology and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Kim Moretti
- South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, and the University of South Australia and the University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, University of Melbourne, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, and the VA Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David C Miller
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Moses KA, Orom H, Brasel A, Gaddy J, Underwood W. Racial/ethnic differences in the relative risk of receipt of specific treatment among men with prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:415.e7-415.e12. [PMID: 27161898 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Revised: 02/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE African-American (AA) men have excess mortality from prostate cancer compared with White men, which has remained unchanged over several decades. The purpose of this study is to determine if race/ethnicity is an independent predictor of receipt of any definitive treatment vs. watchful waiting/active surveillance (WW/AS). METHODS AND MATERIALS Men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2004 to 2011 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results program. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relative risk ratio (RRR) of receipt of radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (RT), brachytherapy, cryotherapy, or combination therapy vs. WW/AS. RESULTS Compared with White men, AA men were significantly less likely to receive RP (RRR = 0.53, P<0.001), brachytherapy (RRR = 0.72, P<0.001), cryotherapy (RRR = 0.84, P = 0.001), and combination therapy (RRR = 0.70, P<0.001), and more likely to receive RT (RRR = 1.03, P = 0.041) vs. AS/WW. Hispanic men were significantly less likely to receive RP (RRR = 0.84, P<0.001) and brachytherapy (RRR = 0.77, P<0.001), and more likely to receive RT (RRR = 1.08, P<0.001), and cryotherapy (RRR = 1.19, P = 0.005) vs. AS/WW compared with White men. CONCLUSIONS The disparate risk of receiving definitive treatment among AA and Hispanic men represents a significant public health issue that requires efforts to improve physician education, increase cultural competency, and ensure equitable access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin A Moses
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| | - Heather Orom
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - Alicia Brasel
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | - Jacquelyne Gaddy
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Willie Underwood
- Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Raval AD, Madhavan S, Mattes MD, Sambamoorthi U. Association between Types of Chronic Conditions and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Prostate Cancer. Popul Health Manag 2016; 19:445-453. [PMID: 27031642 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2015.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The current retrospective observational study was conducted to examine the association between types of chronic conditions and cancer stage at diagnosis among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. The study cohort consisted of elderly men (≥66 years) with prostate cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2009 (N = 103,820). Cancer stage at diagnosis (localized versus advanced) was derived using the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Chronic conditions were identified during the year before cancer diagnosis and classified as: (1) only cardiometabolic (CM); (2) only mental health (MH); (3) only respiratory (RESP); (4) CM + MH; (5) CM + RESP; (6) MH + RESP; (7) CM+ MH + RESP; and (8) none of the 3 types of conditions. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to test the unadjusted and adjusted associations between types of chronic conditions and cancer stage at diagnosis. The highest percentage (5.8%) of advanced prostate cancer was observed among elderly men with none of the 3 types of chronic conditions (CM, RESP, MH). In the adjusted logistic regression, those with none of the 3 types of chronic conditions were 44% more likely to be diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer compared to men with all the 3 types of chronic conditions. Elderly men without any of the selected chronic conditions were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer; therefore, strategies to reduce the risk of advanced prostate cancer should be targeted toward elderly men without these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit D Raval
- 1 Healthcore Inc. , Wilmington, Delaware.,2 Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Suresh Madhavan
- 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Malcolm D Mattes
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Usha Sambamoorthi
- 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zabalza CV, Adam M, Burdelski C, Wilczak W, Wittmer C, Kraft S, Krech T, Steurer S, Koop C, Hube-Magg C, Graefen M, Heinzer H, Minner S, Simon R, Sauter G, Schlomm T, Tsourlakis MC. HOXB13 overexpression is an independent predictor of early PSA recurrence in prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. Oncotarget 2016; 6:12822-34. [PMID: 25825985 PMCID: PMC4494977 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
HOXB13 is a prostate cancer susceptibility gene which shows a cancer predisposing (G84E) mutation in 0.1–0.6% of males. We analyzed the prognostic impact of HOXB13 expression by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray containing more than 12,400 prostate cancers. Results were compared to tumor phenotype, biochemical recurrence, androgen receptor (AR) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) as well as molecular subtypes defined by ERG status and genomic deletions of 3p, 5q, 6q, and PTEN. HOXB13 immunostaining was detectable in 51.7% of 10,216 interpretable cancers and considered strong in 9.6%, moderate in 19.7% and weak in 22.3% of cases. HOXB13 expression was linked to advanced pT stage, high Gleason grade, positive lymph node status (p < 0.0001 each), high pre-operative PSA levels (p = 0.01), TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, PTEN deletions, AR expression, cell proliferation, reduced PSA expression and early PSA recurrence (p < 0.0001 each). The prognostic value of HOXB13 was independent from established parameters including Gleason, stage, nodal stage and PSA. Co-expression analysis identified a subset of tumors with high HOXB13 and AR but low PSA expression that had a particularly poor prognosis. HOXB13 appears to be a promising candidate for clinical routine tests either alone or in combination with other markers, including AR and PSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meike Adam
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Christoph Burdelski
- General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Waldemar Wilczak
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Corina Wittmer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Kraft
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Till Krech
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Christina Koop
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Hans Heinzer
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.,Department of Urology, Section for Translational Prostate Cancer Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Allott EH, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ. Racial Differences in the Association Between Preoperative Serum Cholesterol and Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Results from the SEARCH Database. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25:547-54. [PMID: 26809276 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black men are disproportionately affected by both cardiovascular disease and prostate cancer. Epidemiologic evidence linking dyslipidemia, an established cardiovascular risk factor, and prostate cancer progression is mixed. As existing studies were conducted in predominantly non-black populations, research on black men is lacking. METHODS We identified 628 black and 1,020 non-black men who underwent radical prostatectomy and never used statins before surgery in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Median follow-up was 2.9 years. The impact of preoperative hypercholesterolemia on risk of biochemical recurrence was examined using multivariable, race-stratified proportional hazards. In secondary analysis, we examined associations with low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides, overall and among men with dyslipidemia. RESULTS High cholesterol was associated with increased risk of recurrence in black [HR(per10 mg/dL) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.11] but not non-black men (HR(per10 mg/dL) 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.03; P(interaction) = 0.011). Elevated triglycerides were associated with increased risk in both black and non-black men (HR(per10 mg/dL) 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03 and 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02, respectively; P(interaction) = 0.458). There were no significant associations between LDL or HDL and recurrence risk in either race. Associations with cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides were similar among men with dyslipidemia, but low HDL was associated with increased risk of recurrence in black, but not non-black men with dyslipidemia (P(interaction) = 0.047). CONCLUSION Elevated cholesterol was a risk factor for recurrence in black but not non-black men, whereas high triglycerides were associated with increased risk regardless of race. IMPACT Significantly contrasting associations by race may provide insight into prostate cancer racial disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma H Allott
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lauren E Howard
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William J Aronson
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California. Department of Urology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martha K Terris
- Section of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia. Section of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Christopher J Kane
- Urology Department, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, California
| | | | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Division of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Morris BB, Farnan L, Song L, Addington EL, Chen RC, Nielsen ME, Mishel M, Mohler JL, Bensen JT. Treatment decisional regret among men with prostate cancer: Racial differences and influential factors in the North Carolina Health Access and Prostate Cancer Treatment Project (HCaP-NC). Cancer 2015; 121:2029-35. [PMID: 25740564 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2014] [Revised: 01/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been demonstrated that treatment decisional regret affects quality of life in patients with prostate cancer (CaP); however, there are limited studies that identify factors associated with treatment decisional regret, particularly within a racially diverse patient population that has extended follow-up. METHODS Logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations between decisional regret and potential predictors in a population-based cohort of 348 African American men and 446 Caucasian American men approximately 3 years after CaP diagnosis. RESULTS Of 794 research participants, 12% experienced treatment decisional regret. Decisional regret was associated with androgen-deprivation therapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.0), recent urinary bother (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6-7.3), satisfaction with understanding potential treatment side effects (very unsatisfied: OR, 13.3; 95% CI, 5.5-32.2; somewhat unsatisfied: OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.3-11.2; neutral: OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.9-7.6), and CaP treatment effect on the spousal relationship (very affected: OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.0-7.6; somewhat affected: OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-7.3; neutral: OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.9-7.6). Younger African Americans were more likely to experience regret than older African Americans (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.1), and older African Americans were less likely to experience regret than older Caucasian Americans (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7). CONCLUSIONS Treatment decisional regret remains an important issue in CaP survivors beyond initial treatment. Potential interventions should involve younger African Americans and patient spouses. Increased regret may reflect the unexpected influence of treatment side effects on the patient's everyday life; helping the patient relate potential side effects to his individual situation could improve patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonny B Morris
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Baptist Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Laura Farnan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lixin Song
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth L Addington
- Clinical Health Psychology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew E Nielsen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Surgery/Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Merle Mishel
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - James L Mohler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Surgery/Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.,Department of Urology, University of Buffalo School of Medicine and Biotechnology, Buffalo, New York
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Proteomic-coupled-network analysis of T877A-androgen receptor interactomes can predict clinical prostate cancer outcomes between White (non-Hispanic) and African-American groups. PLoS One 2014; 9:e113190. [PMID: 25409505 PMCID: PMC4237393 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) remains an important contributor to the neoplastic evolution of prostate cancer (CaP). CaP progression is linked to several somatic AR mutational changes that endow upon the AR dramatic gain-of-function properties. One of the most common somatic mutations identified is Thr877-to-Ala (T877A), located in the ligand-binding domain, that results in a receptor capable of promiscuous binding and activation by a variety of steroid hormones and ligands including estrogens, progestins, glucocorticoids, and several anti-androgens. In an attempt to further define somatic mutated AR gain-of-function properties, as a consequence of its promiscuous ligand binding, we undertook a proteomic/network analysis approach to characterize the protein interactome of the mutant T877A-AR in LNCaP cells under eight different ligand-specific treatments (dihydrotestosterone, mibolerone, R1881, testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, dexamethasone, and cyproterone acetate). In extending the analysis of our multi-ligand complexes of the mutant T877A-AR we observed significant enrichment of specific complexes between normal and primary prostatic tumors, which were furthermore correlated with known clinical outcomes. Further analysis of certain mutant T877A-AR complexes showed specific population preferences distinguishing primary prostatic disease between white (non-Hispanic) vs. African-American males. Moreover, these cancer-related AR-protein complexes demonstrated predictive survival outcomes specific to CaP, and not for breast, lung, lymphoma or medulloblastoma cancers. Our study, by coupling data generated by our proteomics to network analysis of clinical samples, has helped to define real and novel biological pathways in complicated gain-of-function AR complex systems.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sundi D, Faisal FA, Trock BJ, Landis PK, Feng Z, Ross AE, Carter HB, Schaeffer EM. Reclassification rates are higher among African American men than Caucasians on active surveillance. Urology 2014; 85:155-60. [PMID: 25440814 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2014] [Revised: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of reclassification on serial biopsy for Caucasian and African American (AA) men with very low-risk (VLR) prostate cancer enrolled in a large prospective active surveillance (AS) registry. METHODS The Johns Hopkins AS registry is a prospective observational study that has enrolled 982 men since 1994. Including only men who met all National Comprehensive Cancer Network VLR criteria (clinical stage ≤T1, Gleason score ≤6, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level <10 ng/mL, PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/cm(3), positive cores <3, percent cancer per core ≤50), we analyzed a cohort of 654 men (615 Caucasians and 39 AAs). The association of race with reclassification on serial biopsy was assessed with competing-risks regressions. RESULTS AA men on AS were more likely than Caucasians to experience upgrading on serial biopsy (36% vs 16%; adjusted P <.001). Adjusting for PSA level, prostate size, volume of cancer on biopsy, treatment year, and body mass index, AA race was an independent predictor of biopsy reclassification (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.8; P = .003). Examining specific modes of reclassification, AA race was independently associated with reclassification by grade (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.0; P = .002) but not by volume. CONCLUSION AA men with VLR prostate cancer followed on AS are at significantly higher risk of grade reclassification compared with Caucasians. Therefore, if the goal of AS is to selectively monitor men with low-grade disease, AA men may require alternate selection criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debasish Sundi
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Farzana A Faisal
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bruce J Trock
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Patricia K Landis
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Zhaoyong Feng
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ashley E Ross
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - H Ballentine Carter
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Aizer AA, Hyatt AS, Lago-Hernandez C, Choueiri TK, Elfiky AA, Hu JC, Sweeney CJ, Beard CJ, D’Amico AV, Martin NE, Kim SP, Lathan CS, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL. Racial disparities in an aging population: The relationship between age and race in the management of African American men with high-risk prostate cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2014; 5:352-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
22
|
Mahal BA, Aizer AA, Ziehr DR, Hyatt AS, Sammon JD, Schmid M, Choueiri TK, Hu JC, Sweeney CJ, Beard CJ, D'Amico AV, Martin NE, Kim SP, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL. Trends in Disparate Treatment of African American Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Across National Comprehensive Cancer Network Risk Groups. Urology 2014; 84:386-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
23
|
Murphy AB, Bhatia R, Martin IK, Klein DA, Hollowell CMP, Nyame Y, Dielubanza E, Achenbach C, Kittles RA. Are HIV-infected men vulnerable to prostate cancer treatment disparities? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23:2009-2018. [PMID: 25063519 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV-infected (HIV(+)) men face cancer treatment disparities that impact outcome. Prostate cancer treatment and treatment appropriateness in HIV(+) men are unknown. METHODS We used electronic chart review to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 43 HIV(+) cases with prostate cancer and 86 age- and race-matched HIV-uninfected (HIV(-)) controls with prostate cancer, ages 40 to 79 years, from 2001 to 2012. We defined treatment appropriateness using National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) to estimate life expectancy. RESULTS Median age was 59.5 years at prostate cancer diagnosis. Median CD4(+) T-cell count was 459.5 cells/mm(3), 95.3% received antiretroviral therapy, and 87.1% were virally suppressed. Radical prostatectomy was the primary treatment for 39.5% of HIV(+) and 71.0% of HIV(-) men (P = 0.004). Only 16.3% of HIV(+) versus 57.0% of HIV(-) men received open radical prostatectomy (P < 0.001). HIV(+) men received more radiotherapy (25.6% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.13). HIV was negatively associated with open radical prostatectomy (OR = 0.03, P = 0.007), adjusting for insurance and CCI. No men were undertreated. Fewer HIV(+) men received appropriate treatment (89.2% vs. 100%, P = 0.003), due to four overtreated HIV(+) men. Excluding AIDS from the CCI still resulted in fewer HIV(+) men receiving appropriate treatment (94.6% vs. 100%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION Prostate cancer in HIV(+) men is largely appropriately treated. Under- or overtreatment may occur from difficulties in life expectancy estimation. HIV(+) men may receive more radiotherapy and fewer radical prostatectomies, specifically open radical prostatectomies. IMPACT Research on HIV/AIDS survival indices and etiologies and outcomes of this prostate cancer treatment disparity in HIV(+) men are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Ramona Bhatia
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Iman K Martin
- Neuropsychiatry Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David A Klein
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Courtney M P Hollowell
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL
| | - Yaw Nyame
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Chad Achenbach
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Rick A Kittles
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, Aizer AA, Hyatt AS, Sammon JD, Schmid M, Choueiri TK, Hu JC, Sweeney CJ, Beard CJ, D'Amico AV, Martin NE, Lathan C, Kim SP, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL. Getting back to equal: The influence of insurance status on racial disparities in the treatment of African American men with high-risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:1285-91. [PMID: 24846344 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2014] [Revised: 04/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treating high-risk prostate cancer (CaP) with definitive therapy improves survival. We evaluated whether having health insurance reduces racial disparities in the use of definitive therapy for high-risk CaP. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was used to identify 70,006 men with localized high-risk CaP (prostate-specific antigen level > 20 ng/ml or Gleason score 8-10 or stage > cT3a) diagnosed from 2007 to 2010. We used multivariable logistic regression to analyze the 64,277 patients with complete data to determine the factors associated with receipt of definitive therapy. RESULTS Compared with white men, African American (AA) men were significantly less likely to receive definitive treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.56-0.64; P < 0.001) after adjusting for sociodemographics and known CaP prognostic factors. There was a significant interaction between race and insurance status (P interaction = 0.01) such that insurance coverage was associated with a reduction in racial disparity between AA and white patients regarding receipt of definitive therapy. Specifically, the AOR for definitive treatment for AA vs. white was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.54, P < 0.001) among uninsured men, whereas the AOR was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.66, P < 0.001) among insured men. CONCLUSIONS AA men with high-risk CaP were significantly less likely to receive potentially life-saving definitive treatment when compared with white men. Having health insurance was associated with a reduction in this racial treatment disparity, suggesting that expansion of health insurance coverage may help reduce racial disparities in the management of aggressive cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Andrew S Hyatt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jesse D Sammon
- Vattikuti Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Marianne Schmid
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Clair J Beard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Neil E Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher Lathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Simon P Kim
- Department of Urology, Cancer Outcomes and Public Policy Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Master VA, Moses KA. Racial disparities in prostate cancer care: Is adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines good enough for our patients? Cancer 2013; 119:2209-11. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2013] [Revised: 01/15/2013] [Accepted: 01/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Viraj A. Master
- Department of Urology, Winship Cancer Institute; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| | - Kelvin A. Moses
- Division of Urology; Georgia Health Sciences University Cancer Center; Atlanta Georgia
| |
Collapse
|