The use and effectiveness of rituximab maintenance in patients with follicular lymphoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 in the United States

R-CHOP treatment for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: Over 15-year follow-up of JCOG0203

Anti-CD20 antibody in combination with chemotherapy extends overall survival (OS) in untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL), yet the optimal associated therapy is unclear. Data on the cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies postrelapse after conventional immunochemotherapy are scarce. A long-term analysis of rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment was conducted in a randomised clinical trial. A six-cycle R-CHOP regimen was administered every 2 or 3 weeks without rituximab maintenance. A prespecified evaluation was conducted 15 years after the completion of enrolment, following initial analysis results that showed no significant differences in outcomes at the 3-year mark. In-depth analyses were performed on the cohort of 248 patients with FL who were allocated to the two treatment arms. With a median follow-up period of 15.9 years, the 15-year OS was 76.2%. There were no protocol treatment-related deaths, nor were there any fatal infections attributable to subsequent lymphoma treatment. At 15 years, the cumulative incidence of non-haematological and haematological malignancies was 12.8% and 3.7% respectively. Histological transformation appeared after a median of 8 years. R-CHOP maintains safety and efficacy in patients with advanced FL over extended follow-up, making it a viable first-line option for patients with advanced-stage FL.

Cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is traditionally considered treatable but incurable. In March 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL after ≥2 lines of therapy. Priced at $373 000, CAR T-cell therapy is potentially curative, and its cost-effectiveness compared with other modern R/R FL treatment strategies is unknown. We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of third-line CAR T-cell vs standard of care (SOC) therapies in adults with R/R FL. We estimated progression rates for patients receiving CAR T-cell and SOC therapies from the ZUMA-5 trial and the LEO CReWE study, respectively. We calculated costs, discounted life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAR T-cell vs SOC therapies with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. Our analysis was conducted from a US payer's perspective over a lifetime horizon. In our base-case model, the cost of the CAR T-cell strategy was $731 682 compared with $458 490 for SOC therapies. However, CAR T-cell therapy was associated with incremental clinical benefit of 1.50 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $182 127 per QALY. Our model was most sensitive to the utilities associated with CAR T-cell therapy remission and third-line SOC therapies and to the total upfront CAR T-cell therapy cost. Under current pricing, CAR T-cell therapy is unlikely to be cost-effective in unselected patients with FL in the third-line setting. Both randomized clinical trials and longer term clinical follow-up can help clarify the benefits of CAR T-cell therapy and optimal sequencing in patients with FL.

Benefit of rituximab maintenance is associated with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index in patients with follicular lymphoma

Rituximab maintenance (RM) prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) of responding patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), but the maintenance efficacy in different Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk group is still confusing. We performed a retrospective analysis of the effect of RM treatments in patients with FL responding to induction therapy based on their FLIPI risk assessment carried out prior to treatment. We identified 93 patients between 2013 and 2019 who received RM every 3 months for ≥4 doses (RM group), and 60 patients who did not accept RM or received rituximab less than 4 doses (control group). After a median follow-up of 39 months, neither median overall survival (OS) nor PFS was reached for the entire population. The PFS was significantly prolonged in the RM group compared to the control group (median PFS NA vs 83.1 months, P = .00027). When the population was divided into the 3 FLIPI risk groups, the PFS differed significantly (4-year PFS rates, 97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%, P = .01) according to group. There was no significant difference in PFS for FLIPI low-risk patients with RM compared to the control group (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 93.8%, P = .23). However, the PFS of the RM group was significantly prolonged for FLIPI intermediate-risk (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 70.3%, P = .00077) and high-risk patients (4-year PFS rates, 86.7% vs 57.1%, P = .023). These data suggest that standard RM significantly prolongs the PFS of patients assigned to intermediate- and high-risk FLIPI groups but not to low-risk FLIPI group, and pending larger-scale studies to validate.

Subcutaneous rituximab in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma: Final results of the non-interventional study MabSCale

BACKGROUND

Rituximab has become a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of rituximab in combination with standard chemotherapies in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. This non-interventional study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Adult patients with previously untreated CD20 positive DLBCL or FL who received rituximab SC and chemotherapy as first-line treatment were observed between 07/2014 and 07/2019 at 99 institutions in Germany. Primary endpoint was the (unconfirmed) complete remission (CR/CRu) rate. Primary outcome was analyzed inferentially; other variables were evaluated descriptively.

RESULTS

Overall 583 patients (247 FL; 336 DLBCL) were evaluated. CR/CRu rates were 51.4% (95% CI: 45.2; 57.6) in the FL set and 48.5% (95% CI: 43.2; 53.8) in the DLBCL set. Regarding progression-free survival in the FL group, the probability of being event-free was 94.2% in the first year and 86.2% in the second year. An overall response was achieved in 85.8% (FL) and 85.4% patients (DLBCL). Patient satisfaction at the end of study with the time saving simplification of the SC vs. intravenous route was 98% for FL and 97% for DLBCL. 45.3% of FL and 47.0% of DLBCL patients experienced an adverse event of grade ≥3. Serious adverse events of grade ≥3 occurred in 27.9% FL and 32.4% DLBCL patients, with the highest incidences for leucopenia, anemia, nausea, and fatigue. No new safety signals were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of rituximab SC in both the FL and the DLBCL group. Satisfaction of patients and nurses with SC administration was high.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Real-World Settings: Findings From the Hemato-Oncology Latin America Observational Registry Study

Real-world evidence on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) management in Latin America is currently lacking. The objective of this study was to describe treatment characteristics and outcomes of NHL in Latin America.

Maintenance rituximab in Veterans with follicular lymphoma

Real-world practice patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including the adoption of maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy in the United States (US), have been reported in few studies since the release of the National LymphoCare Study almost a decade ago. We analyzed data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), to identify rates of adoption and effectiveness of MR in FL patients after first-line (1L) treatment. We identified previously untreated patients with FL in the VHA between 2006 and 2014 who achieved at least stable disease after chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy. Among these patients, those who initiated MR within 238 days of 1L composed the MR group, whereas those who did not were classified as the non-MR group. We examined the effect of MR on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 676 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 300 received MR. MR was associated with significant PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.55, P < .001) and OS (HR = 0.53, P = .005) compared to the non-MR group, after adjusting by age, sex, ethnicity, geographic region, diagnosis period, stage, grade at diagnosis, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), 1L treatment regimen, and response to 1L treatment. These results suggest that in FL patients who do not experience disease progression after 1L treatment in real-world settings, MR is associated with a significant improvement in both PFS and OS. Maintenance therapy should be considered in FL patients who successfully complete and respond to 1L therapy.

Long-term survival and prognostic analysis of advanced stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: A China single-center retrospective study

AIM

The prognosis and treatment options for follicular lymphoma (FL) remain heterogenous. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic impact of rituximab maintenance and evaluate the prognostic models in Chinese FL patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with treatment-naïve advanced stage FL who were treated in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College between January 2008 and December 2018. We compared the baseline characteristics, long-term survival outcomes, prognostic factors and the performance of four common prognostic models (i.e., FLIPI, FLIPI2, PRIMA-PI and LDH+β2M) between them.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were included (rituximab maintenance group, 77 patients; observation group, 81 patients). The median follow-up time was 61.0 months. The rituximab maintenance group showed significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 83.3% vs 52.7%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; 97.8% vs 84.1%, P = 0.032) than the observation group. FLIPI2 showed a more discriminating C index than the other three models.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that rituximab maintenance after chemoimmunotherapy induction can prolong both PFS and OS in patients with advanced-stage FL, and FLIPI2 is a promising prognostic model.

Time to Next Treatment as a Meaningful Endpoint for Trials of Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma

Time to next treatment (TTNT) is an emerging endpoint in clinical studies of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), with utility as a surrogate marker for the “duration of clinical benefit”. TTNT provides a highly clinically meaningful endpoint that uniquely reflects not only the duration of treatment efficacy on disease and symptom control, but also incorporates the patient experience by accounting for patient compliance and tolerance to the studied therapy(s). Given the distinct challenges of pin-pointing the exact date of progression in patients with multi-compartmental CTCL, TTNT overcomes many of the shortcomings of conventional, disease-focused, clinical endpoints in primary CTCL research. Although widely accepted in clinical research for numerous other incurable malignancies, TTNT currently lacks a standardised definition. In this paper, we describe the value of TTNT as a clinical endpoint, review the applications of TTNT in primary CTCL research, and propose a standardised definition of TTNT to be applied in future clinical research of primary CTCL therapies.

Efficacy of salvage therapy with MTX-HOPE for elderly patients with heavily pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Methotrexate, hydrocortisone, vincristine, sobuzoxane, and etoposide (MTX-HOPE) chemotherapy was originally reported in 2007 as a salvage regimen for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. To clarify the safety and efficacy of this regimen, we retrospectively analyzed patients at our institute. We analyzed 18 patients, including 16 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), one with follicular lymphoma (FL), and one with T-cell lymphoma. The median age at MTX-HOPE therapy was 79 (range: 68-87). Ten patients received more than 3 previous chemotherapy regimens. The median period from the initial treatment to the first MTX-HOPE administration was 53 months. No patient had severe renal dysfunction. The overall response rate was 78%, with 39% achieving CR and 39% achieving PR. The median OS and PFS after the initiation of MTX-HOPE were 10 months (range: 0.5-86 months) and 7 months (range: 0.2-86 months), respectively. The one-year OS rate was 44% and the two-year OS rate was 22%. The median number of treatment cycles was 7 (range: 1-46), and 6 patients received more than 10 cycles. Among eight patients who were over 80 years of age, 7 responded to the therapy, and the median OS and PFS of this subgroup were 19 months and 11 months, respectively. All patients tolerated the treatment well, mostly on an outpatient basis, except for one who died from infection and one who developed intracranial hemorrhage. MTX-HOPE may be a promising treatment option for elderly patients with refractory or relapsed malignant lymphoma.

First-line R-CVP versus R-CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4

R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R‐CVP or R‐CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m² q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). Two‐hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R‐CHOP: 127, R‐CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21–85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III–IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R‐CHOP and R‐CVP groups (P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow‐up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five‐year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression‐free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R‐CHOP vs. the R‐CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients,; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R‐CHOP and the R‐CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five‐year follow‐up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R‐CVP or R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R‐CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second‐line therapy.

Up-front rituximab maintenance improves outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma: a collaborative Nordic study

The introduction of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab in combination with chemotherapy (R-chemo) has improved the prognosis of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). During the last decade, the addition of a maintenance treatment with rituximab (MR) after R-chemo has been tested with the hope of further improving the outcome of these patients. Using 2 independent population-based cohorts, we investigated the effect of up-front MR on time related end points as well as the risk of histological transformation (HT). FL patients were included if they: (1) completed first-line induction treatment with R-chemo, (2) were alive after induction treatment and eligible for MR, and (3) had no evidence of HT at this time point. The training cohort consisted of 733 Danish patients of whom 364 were consolidated with MR; 369 were not. Patients receiving MR more often had advanced clinical stage (90% vs 78%), high Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score (64% vs 55%), and bone marrow infiltration (49% vs 40%). Those consolidated with MR had an improved 5-year overall survival (OS; 89% vs 81%; P = .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; 72% vs 60%; P < .001). In the training cohort, MR was associated with a reduction of HT risk (P = .049). Analyses of an independent validation cohort of 190 Finnish patients confirmed the favorable impact of MR on 5-year OS (89% vs 81%; P = .046) and PFS (70% vs 57%; P = .005) but did not find a reduced risk of HT. The present population-based data suggest that the outcome of patients with FL has improved after consolidation of R-chemo with MR.

Rituximab maintenance improves overall survival in follicular lymphoma: A retrospective nationwide real-world analysis from Taiwan Cancer Registry Database

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most frequent indolent lymphoma in Western countries, but it is less frequent in Asia. Several trials have demonstrated the progression‐free benefit of rituximab maintenance for FL patients in Western countries. However, the overall survival (OS) benefits and effectiveness of rituximab maintenance in Asian FL patients remain uncertain. We utilized the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database and the National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate the roles of rituximab maintenance for newly diagnosed FL patients in Taiwan. Among 836 patients with newly diagnosed FL during 2009‐2012, we enrolled patients with stage II‐IV diseases receiving 4‐8 cycles of rituximab‐containing induction chemotherapies (R‐induction). We excluded those who died or received additional chemotherapy within 180 days after R‐induction. Among the 396 enrolled patients, 260 underwent rituximab maintenance (R‐maintenance group), and 136 served as the observation group. The R‐maintenance group received less anthracycline and fewer cycles of R‐induction than the observation group, but they exhibited a significantly better OS both in the univariate and multivariate analyses [hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.19‐0.91] after adjusting for age, sex, and Ann Arbor stages. Meanwhile, we also found more patients required further therapies in the first 6 months after the cease of rituximab maintenance. In the subgroup analysis, patients older than 60 years or with stage IV diseases benefited more from rituximab maintenance. Conclusively, our nationwide study is the first one to demonstrate the OS benefit of rituximab maintenance after induction therapies in newly diagnosed FL patients from Asian populations.

Rituximab maintenance therapy of follicular lymphoma in clinical practice

Standard of care for patients with symptomatic, advanced‐stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is rituximab‐containing chemoimmunotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance. This prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study analyzed how efficacy and safety data from randomized controlled trials translate into clinical practice in Germany. Both treatment‐naïve and relapsed/refractory patients with FL, who responded to rituximab‐containing induction and were scheduled for rituximab maintenance, were observed for 24 months. Effectiveness was measured by response and Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis. In addition, treatment patterns of induction and maintenance, as well as adverse events, were documented. The evaluable study population consisted of 310 first‐line patients and 173 relapsed/refractory patients, including 116 patients with initial Ann‐Arbor stage I/II and 20 patients with FL grade 3B. Regarding first‐line induction, a shift from R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) to R‐bendamustine was observed over time, as well as a decline in radiotherapy. 2‐year progression‐free survival rates were 88.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.0‐92.6) for first‐line patients and 76.0% (95% CI: 68.8‐83.3) for relapsed/refractory patients. Conversion from partial to complete remission (PR, CR) occurred in 53.4% of analyzed first‐line patients with PR, resulting in 69.4% CRs at study end (relapsed/refractory: conversion in 42.9%, final CRs 57.9%). Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of rituximab in this setting. Both treatment‐naïve and relapsed/refractory patients with FL show favorable 2‐year PFS rates and improvements in the remission status with postinduction rituximab monotherapy as maintenance and consolidation therapy.

Impact of treatment in long-term survival patients with follicular lymphoma: A Spanish Lymphoma Oncology Group registry

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma is the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States and Europe. However, most of the prospective randomized studies have very little follow-up compared to the long natural history of the disease. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the long-term survival of our series of patients with follicular lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1074 patients with newly diagnosed FL were enrolled. Patients diagnosed were prospectively enrolled from 1980 to 2013.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 54.9 months and median overall survival is over 20 years in our series. We analyzed the patients who are still alive beyond 10 years from diagnosis in order to fully assess the prognostic factors that condition this group. Out of 166 patients who are still alive after more than 10 years of follow-up, 118 of them (73%) are free of evident clinical disease. Variables significantly associated with survival at 10 years were stage < II (p <0.03), age < 60 years (p <0.0001), low FLIPI (p <0.002), normal β2 microglobulin (p <0.005), no B symptoms upon diagnosis (p <0.02), Performance Status 0-1 (p <0.03) and treatment with anthracyclines and rituximab (p <0.001), or rituximab (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A longer follow-up and a large series demonstrated a substantial population of patients with follicular lymphoma free of disease for more than 10 years.

Dose-Modified Ifosfamide, Epirubicin, and Etoposide is a Safe and Effective Salvage Therapy with High Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Capacity for Poorly Mobilized Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients

A dose modified ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IVE) regimen was prospectively assessed for its efficacy in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation. Two patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and two with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were undergoing stem cell therapy were studied. All patients had a history of multiple treatments with insufficient stem cell mobilization. The dose modified IVE regimen consisted of ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) intravenously (IV) administered on days 1-2 in combination with epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) (100 mg/m(2) in two patients with complete remission) IV on days 1-3. The ifosfamide dosage was reduced to two-thirds of the original protocol. A substantial high yield of CD34(+) cells was achieved when patients were treated with a dose-modified IVE regimen, compared with that during the previous regimen (two with the ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide [ICE] regimen, one with high-dose cyclophosphamide and one with the original IVE regimen). Two patients who had refractory and residual disease received a 200 mg/m(2) dose of etoposide, which resulted in tumor reduction (one patient with complete remission and one with further reduction in tumor size). After the IVE regimen, all four patients had a sufficient yield of CD34(+) cells in total, which was available for stem cell transplantation. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were comparable in all regimens. This single-center prospective study demonstrated that the dose-modified IVE regimen can be used as a safe treatment with high mobilizing efficacy in heavily pretreated lymphoma patients.

Characterizing and prognosticating chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the elderly: prospective evaluation on 455 patients treated in the United States

Background

Median age at diagnosis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is > 70 years. However, the majority of clinical trials do not reflect the demographics of CLL patients treated in the community. We examined treatment patterns, outcomes, and disease-related mortality in patients ≥ 75 years with CLL (E-CLL) in a real-world setting.

Methods

The Connect® CLL registry is a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study, which enrolled 1494 adult patients between 2010–2014, at 199 US sites. Patients with CLL were enrolled within 2 months of initiating first line of therapy (LOT1) or a subsequent LOT (LOT ≥ 2). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to evaluate overall survival. CLL- and infection-related mortality were assessed using cumulative incidence functions (CIF) and cause-specific hazards. Logistic regression was used to develop a classification model.

Results

A total of 455 E-CLL patients were enrolled; 259 were enrolled in LOT1 and 196 in LOT ≥ 2. E-CLL patients were more likely to receive rituximab monotherapy (19.3 vs. 8.6%; p < 0.0001) and chemotherapy-alone regimens (p < 0.0001) than younger patients. Overall and complete responses were lower in E-CLL patients than younger patients when given similar regimens. With a median follow-up of 3 years, CLL-related deaths were higher in E-CLL patients than younger patients in LOT1 (12.6 vs. 5.1% p = 0.0005) and LOT ≥ 2 (31.3 vs. 21.5%; p = 0.0277). Infection-related deaths were also higher in E-CLL patients than younger patients in LOT1 (7.4 vs. 2.7%; p = 0.0033) and in LOT ≥ 2 (16.2 vs. 11.2%; p = 0.0786). A prognostic score for E-CLL patients was developed: time from diagnosis to treatment < 3 months, enrollment therapy other than bendamustine/rituximab, and anemia, identified patients at higher risk of inferior survival. Furthermore, higher-risk patients experienced an increased risk of CLL- or infection-related death (30.6 vs 10.3%; p = 0.0006).

Conclusion

CLL- and infection-related mortality are higher in CLL patients aged ≥ 75 years than younger patients, underscoring the urgent need for alternative treatment strategies for these understudied patients.

Trial Registration

The Connect CLL registry was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01081015 on March 4, 2010.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3176-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A phase 1/2 trial of ublituximab, a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia previously exposed to rituximab

This phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic behavior and anti‐tumour activity of ublituximab, a unique type I, chimeric, glycoengineered anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, in rituximab‐relapsed or ‐refractory patients with B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Induction therapy (doses of 450–1200 mg) consisted of 4 weekly infusions in cycle 1 for NHL and 3 weekly infusions in cycles 1 and 2 for CLL. Patients received ublituximab maintenance monthly during cycles 3–5, then once every 3 months for up to 2 years. Enrolled patients with B‐NHL (n = 27) and CLL (n = 8) had a median of 3 prior therapies. No dose‐limiting toxicities or unexpected adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most common AEs were infusion‐related reactions (40%; grade 3/4, 0%); fatigue (37%; grade 3/4, 3%); pyrexia (29%; grade 3/4, 0%); and diarrhoea (26%; grade 3/4, 0%). Common haematological AEs were neutropenia (14%; grade 3/4, 14%) and anaemia (11%; grade 3/4, 6%). The overall response rate for evaluable patients (n = 31) was 45% (13% complete responses, 32% partial responses). Median duration of response and progression‐free survival were 9·2 months and 7·7 months, respectively. Ublituximab was well‐tolerated and efficacious in a heterogeneous and highly rituximab‐pre‐treated patient population.

Disease, treatment, and outcome differences between men and women with follicular lymphoma in the United States

We aimed to comprehensively study sex differences in disease and patients' characteristics, treatment and outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in the United States (USA) utilizing the National LymphoCare Study registry (2004-2014). Among evaluable males (n = 1277) and females (n = 1375) with FL, females less commonly received anthracyclines and were more likely to receive rituximab monotherapy. Overall response rates were comparable between sex groups. With a median follow-up of 8.1 years, male sex emerged as an adverse factor for PFS (HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.72-0.97). Lymphoma-related mortality (HR, 0.46; 0.23-0.93) and overall survival (HR, 0.63; 0.41-0.97) favored females aged ≤60 years. There are subtle differences in outcomes between male and female FL patients diagnosed and treated in the contemporary era. These data represent the largest prospective analysis of FL patients in the USA based on sex and can aid design of clinical trials for this disease. Am. J. Hematol. 91:770-775, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of lymphoid cancer in Western Europe.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of rituximab-bendamustine treatment compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced FL in Spain.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost effectiveness of rituximab-bendamustine compared with R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with advanced FL in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Transitions between health states (progression-free, including induction and maintenance; first relapse; second relapse; and death) were allowed for the patient cohort in 4-week-long cycles. Clinical data for the extrapolation of progression-free survival curves were obtained from randomized trials. Mortality rates and utilities were obtained from the literature. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The total costs (€, 2013) included drug costs (ex-factory prices with mandatory deductions), disease management costs and adverse event-associated costs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3 % annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to assess the model robustness.

RESULTS

Treatment and administration costs during the induction phase were higher for rituximab-bendamustine (€17,671) than for R-CHOP (€11,850). At the end of the 25-year period, the rituximab-bendamustine first-line strategy had a total cost of €68,357 compared with €69,528 for R-CHOP. Health benefits were higher for rituximab-bendamustine treatment (10.31 QALYs) than for R-CHOP treatment (9.82 QALYs). In the probabilistic analysis, rituximab-bendamustine was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP in 53.4 % of the simulations.

CONCLUSION

First-line therapy with rituximab-bendamustine in FL patients was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP; it showed cost savings and higher health benefits for the Spanish NHS.

PET-based molecular imaging in personalized oncology: potential of the assessment of therapeutic outcome

Molecular imaging techniques allow an individualization and optimization of therapy on a patient basis noninvasively. The availability of new hybrid scanners, like PET-computed tomography and PET-MRI allow the combined assessment of changes in morphology and function and are a unique tool for personalized cancer treatment. In particular, it is crucial to identify nonresponders as soon as possible for therapy guidance. The choice of the appropriate therapy and optimal treatment duration can help to avoid side effects and save costs. Furthermore, the development of new specific tracers will enable a more accurate assessment of a therapeutic result. Numerous peptides targeting receptor-active tumors are in development with a high potential in a large spectrum of tumors for theranostic approaches.

Factors influencing outcome in advanced stage, low-grade follicular lymphoma treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center in the rituximab era

BACKGROUND

The optimal initial therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL) remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare primary treatment strategies and assess the impact of maintenance rituximab and patterns of treatment failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with treatment-naive advanced stage, grade 1-2 FL treated at our center from 2004 to 2014. We included 356 patients treated on clinical trials or standard of care with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP, n = 119); R-CHOP with maintenance (R-CHOP + M, n = 65); bendamustine/rituximab (BR, n = 45); BR with maintenance (BR + M, n = 35); R(2) (n = 94). We compared baseline characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and analyzed prognostic factors using univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted for treatment.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 4 years (range 0.2-15.0), the 3-year PFS was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51% to 69%] for R-CHOP, 72% (59% to 82%) for R-CHOP + M, 63% (42% to 78%) for BR, 97% (80% to 100%) for BR + M and 87% (78% to 93%) for R(2). Patients treated with R-chemotherapy had more high-risk features than patients treated with R(2) but, by adjusted multivariate analysis, treatment with R(2) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39 (0.17-0.89), P = 0.02] was associated with a superior PFS. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status of one or more predicted inferior OS. Among patients treated with R-chemotherapy, maintenance was associated with the superior PFS [HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.21-0.68)]. By adjusted multivariate analysis, disease progression within 2 years [HR 5.1 (95% CI 1.57-16.83)] and histologic transformation (HT) [HR 11.05 (95% CI 2.84-42.93)] increased risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Induction therapy with R(2) may result in disease control which is comparable with R-chemotherapy. Early disease progression and HT are predictive of inferior survival.

Impact of rituximab maintenance and maintenance schedule on prognosis in first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma. Retrospective analysis from Czech Lymphoma Study Group (CLSG) database

Rituximab maintenance (RM) improves time to progression (PFS) in advanced follicular lymphoma (FL), but the impact of various RM schedules remains unknown. This study performed a retrospective evaluation of RM given for up to 2 years vs observation in 319 untreated FL patients (stage II-IV; grade 1-3A) responding to RCHOP induction and a comparison of two different RM schedules (RM8=eight doses given every 3 months and RM12=12 doses given every 2 months). A total of 183 patients received RM and 136 patients were observed; 5-year PFS was better in the RM arm, 74.1% vs 52.3% (p<0.001), which was projected in 5-year OS 93.8% vs 87.5% (p=0.005). However, 5-year PFS was similar in both the RM8 (n=54) and RM12 (n=56) arms. In the first line, RM significantly prolongs PFS and OS in FL, but different RM schedules bring a similar benefit.

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of rituximab maintenance and radioimmunotherapy consolidation versus observation following first-line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Phase 3 randomized trials have shown that maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy or radioimmunotherapy (RIT) consolidation following frontline therapy can improve progression-free survival for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), but the cost-effectiveness of these approaches with respect to observation has not been examined using a common modeling framework.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the economic impact of MR and RIT consolidation versus observation, respectively, following the first-line induction therapy for patients with advanced-stage FL.

METHODS

We developed Markov models to estimate patients' lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and life-years (LYs) after MR, RIT, and observation following frontline FL treatment from the US payer's perspective. Progression risks, adverse event probabilities, costs, and utilities were estimated from clinical data of Primary RItuximab and MAintenance (PRIMA) trial, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) trial (for MR), and First-line Indolent Trial (for RIT) and the published literature. We evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for direct comparisons between MR/RIT and observation. Model robustness was addressed by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Compared with observation, MR provided an additional 1.089 QALYs (1.099 LYs) and 1.399 QALYs (1.391 LYs) on the basis of the PRIMA trial and the ECOG trial, respectively, and RIT provided an additional 1.026 QALYs (1.034 LYs). The incremental cost per QALY gained was $40,335 (PRIMA) or $37,412 (ECOG) for MR and $40,851 for RIT. MR and RIT had comparable incremental QALYs before first progression, whereas RIT had higher incremental costs of adverse events due to higher incidences of cytopenias.

CONCLUSIONS

MR and RIT following frontline FL therapy demonstrated favorable and similar cost-effectiveness profiles. The model results should be interpreted within the specific clinical settings of each trial. Selection of MR, RIT, or observation should be based on patient characteristics and expected trade-offs for these alternatives.

Next-generation surveillance strategies for patients with lymphoma

While remission and cure rates for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma continue to improve, surveillance approaches remain controversial, especially in light of recent reports suggesting limited benefit for routine radiologic assessment. Routine cross-sectional imaging results in considerable patient expense and anxiety, and this approach does not clearly improve patient outcomes. Next-generation approaches including minimal residual disease detection may provide an opportunity to identify relapse early and intervene prior to progression of clinical disease. This review discusses the role of surveillance imaging in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and provides an introduction to serologic assessment of minimal residual disease. Future studies will need to focus on the clinical application of minimal residual disease surveillance and its ability to predict relapse, treatment response and survival.

Comparison of the effectiveness of frontline chemoimmunotherapy regimens for follicular lymphoma used in the United States

To compare the effectiveness of frontline rituximab-chemotherapy regimens in clinical practice, we examined outcomes for patients with low-grade, stage III/IV follicular lymphoma receiving rituximab (R) with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP), R with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) or R with a fludarabine-based regimen (R-Flu) as frontline therapy. In total, 611 patients meeting these criteria were identified in the National LymphoCare Study: 47% receiving R-CHOP (n = 287), 31% receiving R-CVP (n = 187) and 22% receiving R-Flu (n = 137). Overall response rates were high (R-CVP 87%, R-CHOP 93%, R-Flu 94%; p = 0.017). Median follow-up was 7.4 years. R-CVP was associated with lower 5-year overall survival (R-CVP 76%, R-CHOP 86%, R-Flu 86%; p = 0.021) and progression-free survival (R-CVP 49%, R-CHOP 58%, R-Flu 64%; p = 0.029). There were no significant differences in survival in Cox models adjusted for baseline clinical factors, practice region/setting and post-treatment R maintenance/observation.

Rituximab in follicular lymphoma: the first chapter of the new era?

SUMMARY 

Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent B-cell lymphoma. Although there is no current standard of care adopted for all patients, clinical outcomes for patients with follicular lymphoma have significantly improved over the past few decades, which can be largely attributed to the incorporation of immunotherapy. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to the CD20 antigen, has been widely adopted in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, resulting from improvements in remission duration and overall survival. We provide an evidence-based discussion of the clinical success and incorporation of immunotherapy, rituximab in the treatment of follicular lymphoma, the prototypical indolent B-cell lymphoma. This shift in the treatment paradigm has opened the door to novel, nonchemotherapy approaches in the treatment of patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma.