Trends, predictors, and impact of systemic chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer patients between 1985 and 2005

Radiotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era

Currently, chemoimmunotherapy is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, only 0.8%-2.5% of the patients presented complete response after chemoimmunotherapy. Considering that ES-SCLC is highly sensitive to radiotherapy, the addition of radiotherapy after first-line treatment for ES-SCLC could further improve local control, which may be beneficial for patients' survival. Prior studies have shown that consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) can decrease disease progression and improve overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC who respond well to chemotherapy. However, the efficacy and safety of cTRT in the immunotherapy era remain unclear owing to a lack of prospective studies. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been shown to decrease brain metastasis (BM) and prolong survival in patients with limited-stage SCLC in previous reports. However, according to current guidelines, PCI is not commonly recommended for ES-SCLC. Immunotherapy has the potential to reduce the incidence of BM. Whether PCI can be replaced with regular magnetic resonance imaging surveillance for ES-SCLC in the era of immunotherapy remains controversial. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is the standard treatment for BM in SCLC patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown promise in the treatment of limited BM. Considering the potential of immunotherapy to decrease BM, it is controversial whether SRS can replace WBRT for limited BM in the immunotherapy era. Additionally, with the addition of immunotherapy, the role of palliative radiotherapy may be weakened in patients with asymptomatic metastatic lesions. However, it is still indispensable and urgent for patients with obvious symptoms of metastatic disease, such as spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome, lobar obstruction, and weight-bearing metastases, which may critically damage the quality of life and prognosis. To improve the outcome of ES-SCLC, we discuss the feasibility of radiotherapy, including cTRT, PCI, WBRT/SRS, and palliative radiotherapy with immunotherapy based on existing evidence, which may offer specific prospects for further randomized trials and clinical applications.

Treatment patterns and burden of myelosuppression for patients with small cell lung cancer: A SEER-medicare study

PURPOSE

To depict the treatment journey for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and evaluate health care resource utilization (HCRU) associated with myelosuppression, a complication induced by chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with SCLC aged ≥65 years, identified from linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data curated between January 2012 and December 2015. Treatment types (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery) were classified as first, second, or third line, depending on the temporal sequence in which regimens were prescribed. For each year, the proportions of patients completing 4- or 6-cycle chemotherapy regimens, with hospital admissions associated with myelosuppression, or who used granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), blood/platelet transfusions, or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), were calculated.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was administered as initial treatment in 7,807/11,907 (65.6%) patients whose treatment journey was recorded. Approximately one-third (n = 3,985) subsequently received radiation therapy. In total, 5,791 (57.8%) patients completed the guideline-recommended 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Among all chemotherapy-treated patients, 10,370 (74.3%) experienced ≥1 inpatient admission associated with myelosuppression (anemia, 7,366 [52.8%]; neutropenia, 4,642 [33.3%]; thrombocytopenia, 2,375 [17.0%]; pancytopenia, 1,983 [14.2%]). Supportive care interventions included G-CSF (6,756 [48.4%] patients), ESAs (1,534 [11.0%]), and transfusions (3,674 [26.3%]).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of care for patients with SCLC. Slightly over half of patients completed the recommended number of cycles, underscoring the frailty of patients and aggressiveness of SCLC. HCRU associated with myelosuppression was prominent, suggesting a substantial burden on older patients with SCLC.

Comparative study of survival among small cell lung cancer patients in the U.S. military health system and those in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program

PURPOSE

The U.S. military health system provides universal health care access to beneficiaries. However, whether the universal access has translated into improved patient outcome is unknown. We compared survival of small-cell lung cancer patients in the military health system with that in the U.S. general population. Stage and receipt of cancer treatment were also compared to see if they could contribute to survival difference.

METHODS

The data were obtained from The Department of Defense's Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR) and the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, respectively. ACTUR (N = 3040) and SEER patients (N = 12,160) were matched on age, sex, race and diagnosis year. Multivariable Cox regression model was used to compare all-cause mortality between ACTUR and SEER. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to compare cancer stage and treatment.

RESULTS

ACTUR patients exhibited significantly better survival than SEER counterparts (HR = 0.77, 95% CI= 0.71-0.83). ACTUR and SEER patients had similar stage, but ACTUR patients were more likely to receive radiation treatment (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.12-1.42). The survival advantage of ACTUR patients remained across all tumor stages and radiation groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of small-cell lung cancer patients with universal health care access had better survival than similar patients in the U.S. general population. Future studies are warranted to identify factors that may contribute to the improved survival.

Lung cancer treatment patterns and factors relating to systemic therapy use in Australia

AIM

Systemic therapies for lung cancer are rapidly evolving. This study aimed to describe lung cancer treatment patterns in New South Wales, Australia, prior to the introduction of immunotherapy and latest-generation targeted therapies.

METHODS

Systemic therapy utilization and treatment-related factors were examined for participants in the New South Wales 45 and Up Study with incident lung cancer ascertained by record linkage to the New South Wales Cancer Registry (2006-2013). Systemic therapy receipt to June 2016 was determined using medical and pharmaceutical claims data from Services Australia, and in-patient hospital records. Factors related to treatment were identified using competing risks regressions.

RESULTS

A total of 1,116 lung cancer cases were identified with a mean age at diagnosis of 72 years and median survival of 10.6 months. Systemic therapy was received by 45% of cases. Among 400 cases with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, 51% and 28% received first- and second-line systemic therapy, respectively. Among 112 diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer, 79% and 29% received first- and second-line systemic therapy. The incidence of systemic therapy was lower for participants with indicators of poor performance status, lower educational attainment, and those who lived in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage; and was higher for participants with small-cell lung cancer histology or higher body mass index.

CONCLUSION

This population-based Australian study identified patterns of systemic therapy use for lung cancer, particularly small-cell lung cancer. Despite a universal healthcare system, the analysis revealed socioeconomic disparities in health service utilization and relatively low utilization of systemic therapy overall.

Development and Utility of the Observational Research in Oncology Toolbox: Cancer Medications Enquiry Database-Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS)

PURPOSE

Health-care claims are of increasing utility as a rich, real-world data resource for conducting treatment-related cancer research. However, multiple dynamic coding nomenclatures exist, leading to study variability. To promote increased standardization and reproducibility, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) developed the Cancer Medications Enquiry Database (CanMED)-Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) within the Observational Research in Oncology Toolbox.

METHODS

The CanMED-HCPCS includes codes for oncology medications that a) have a US Food and Drug Administration-approved indication for cancer treatment or treatment-related symptom management; b) are present in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines; or c) carry an orphan drug designation for treatment or management of cancer. Included medications and their HCPCS codes were primarily identified based on Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services annual HCPCS Indices (2012-2018). To demonstrate the utility of the CanMED-HCPCS, use of systemic treatment for stage II-IV colorectal cancer patients included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2007-2013) was assessed.

RESULTS

The CanMED-HCPCS (v2018) includes 332 HCPCS codes for cancer-related medications: chemotherapy (156), immunotherapy (74), hormonal therapy (54), and ancillary therapy (48). Observed treatment trends within the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data were as expected; utilization of each treatment type increased with stage, and immunotherapy was largely confined to use among stage IV patients.

CONCLUSION

The CanMED-HCPCS provides a comprehensive resource that can be used by the research community to facilitate systematic identification of medications within claims or electronic health data using the HCPCS nomenclature and greater reproducibility of cancer surveillance and health services research.

Small cell lung cancer: a slightly less orphan disease after immunotherapy

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy accounting for 15% of all diagnosed cases of lung cancer. After >15 years without any clinically relevant therapeutic advances, extensive-disease SCLC has become the second thoracic malignancy for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shifted the treatment paradigm to improve overall survival. Today, atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is considered the new standard of care in the first-line setting in SCLC. However, the magnitude of benefit with this immune-chemotherapy strategy in SCLC is more modest than that observed in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The immunosuppressive phenotype of SCLC plays an important role in hampering ICI efficacy and may explain the differences in outcomes between these two types of lung cancer. In this review, we provide a summary of recent therapeutic advances in SCLC in light of ICIs, as well as current challenges of this strategy in patients who are elderly, have poor performance status or brain metastases. We also address future perspectives of immunotherapeutic strategies currently in clinical development for these patients.

A Call to Action: Dismantling Racial Injustices in Preclinical Research and Clinical Care of Black Patients Living with Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with dismal survival rates and limited therapeutic options. SCLC development is strongly associated with exposure to tobacco carcinogens. However, additional genetic and environmental risk factors that contribute to SCLC pathogenesis are beginning to emerge. Here, we specifically assess disparities pertaining to SCLC in Black populations. In contrast to non-small cell lung cancer, preliminary data suggest that Black individuals may actually be at a lower risk of developing SCLC relative to white individuals. This difference remains unexplained but urgently needs to be verified in larger data sets, because it could provide important new insights and approaches to understanding this recalcitrant tumor. Importantly, little biological information exists on SCLC in Black individuals, and few patient-derived preclinical SCLC models from diverse ancestries are available in the laboratory. Unfortunately, we note strikingly low numbers of Black participants in clinical trials testing new treatments for SCLC. Evidence further indicates that care for patients with SCLC may vary between communities with a large fraction of Black patients and those without. Together, these observations underscore the need to better investigate genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors associated with SCLC development, preclinical research, clinical care, and outcomes.

The Role of Performance Status in Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

After decades of platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced small-cell lung cancer, there has finally been a therapeutic advance. The combination of a platinum chemotherapy, etoposide, and an immune checkpoint inhibitor has yielded overall survival benefits in two successive phase 3 trials. Unfortunately, these trials only included fit patients, namely those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. In the real-world setting, roughly a third of patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer has a performance status of 2, and an additional 15% have a performance status of 3 or 4, meaning that approximately half of all patients are excluded from chemoimmunotherapy trials. Poor performance status is a known negative prognostic factor, with a dismal prognosis among patients with disease that does not respond to the first cycle of chemotherapy.We review current data on immunotherapy in advanced small-cell lung cancer and discuss how we integrate the new therapeutic options into daily practice.

Primary Parotid Merkel Type Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Oligometastasis to the Brain and Adrenal Gland: Case Report and Review of Literature

Oligometastatic disease is a hypothesized intermediate stage of disease between localized and widespread metastatic cancer. Localized treatment of oligometastatic lesions may offer survival advantages in addition to systemic treatment. In this case report, we describe a patient who presented with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma "Merkel type" (SNECM) of the parotid gland which had metastasized to the brain and adrenal gland. He was treated with chemotherapy followed by stereotactic radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for oligometastasis. He maintains good functional status with low burden of disease at 20-months after diagnosis. SNECM is a rare and aggressive parotid cancer with immunohistochemical and morphologic similarities to Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). There are only 44 cases of parotid SNECM in the English literature. This is the first case to describe management of oligometastatic SNECM and we review literature on management of both SNECM and metastatic MCC.

Utilization of Antineoplastic Agents and Medicare Spending in Elderly Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Between 2001 and 2013

PURPOSE

Some elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) do not receive chemotherapy likely because of fear of toxicity and uncertainty regarding benefits. Thus, we aimed to study real-world trends in utilization of antineoplastics over the years and predictors of utilization, survival, and Medicare expenditure in elderly patients with extensive-stage (ES) SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the linked SEER and Medicare database, we identified elderly patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC between 2001 and 2013. The Wald test was used to determine the significance of trends. Cox proportional hazards models were applied for survival analyses. We used SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

We identified 15,763 patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. Approximately 6,838 patients (43.38%) received antineoplastics, and 8,925 patients (56.61%) received supportive care only. Every year since 2001, the percentage of patients receiving antineoplastics has decreased (45.8% v 36.6% in 2001 and 2013, respectively; P_trend < .0001). Patients with advanced age (P < .001), patients from high-poverty areas (P < .001) or rural areas (P = .005), patients with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (P < .001), and non-Hispanic blacks (P = .003) and Hispanics (P = .001) were less likely to receive antineoplastics. Mean Medicare spending per patient decreased over the study period for patients treated with antineoplastics ($45,998 in 2001 and $35,053 in 2013; P_trend < .001) and for those receiving supportive care only ($34,197 in 2001 and $25,265 in 2013; P_trend < .001).

CONCLUSION

Decreasing utilization of antineoplastics in elderly patients with ES-SCLC since 2001 could be partly secondary to higher comorbidities and physiologic age, leading to poor candidacy. Medicare expenditures decreased likely as a result of value-based treatment initiatives by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. However, expenditures are likely to increase with use of expensive novel agents.

High Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) Represents an Unfavorable Prognostic Factor for Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Etoposide and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been demonstrated to be closely associated with prognosis of a series of solid tumors. However, its role in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains poorly understood. The present study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment SII in SCLC treated with etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Sixty hundred and fifty-three newly diagnosed SCLC patients were enrolled. The optimal cut-off values for SII and LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) were obtained by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off values of pretreatment SII and LDH were 748.51 × 10⁹/L and 188.5 U/L, respectively. High pretreatment SII was significantly associated with advanced tumor stage (limited disease, LD vs. extensive disease, ED; 26.3% vs 46.5%; p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, age < 65 years, female, non-smoker, limited disease, SII < 748.51 × 10⁹/L, LDH < 188.5 U/L, distant metastasis numbers < 2, chemotherapy + radiotherapy, and chemotherapy + surgery were closely correlated with a prolonged OS (p < 0.05). The median OS for patients in high SII group was 12.0 months, compared with that of 17.0 months for patients in low SII group. Multivariate analysis showed smoking history (p = 0.014), tumor stage (p < 0.001), pretreatment SII (p < 0.001), LDH (p = 0.002), distant metastasis numbers (p = 0.006), and chemotherapy + radiotherapy (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of OS. Furthermore, SII remained prognostic significance for SCLC stratified by variable subgroups analysis.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment SII represents a powerful prognostic biomarker for SCLC patients treated with etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy. It is significant for treatment strategy making in clinics.

Role of Focal Adhesion Kinase in Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 15% of all lung cancers and it is clinically the most aggressive type, being characterized by a tendency for early metastasis, with two-thirds of the patients diagnosed with an extensive stage (ES) disease and a five-year overall survival (OS) as low as 5%. There are still no effective targeted therapies in SCLC despite improved understanding of the molecular steps leading to SCLC development and progression these last years. After four decades, the only modest improvement in OS of patients suffering from ES-SCLC has recently been shown in a trial combining atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, with carboplatin and etoposide, chemotherapy agents. This highlights the need to pursue research efforts in this field. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase that is overexpressed and activated in several cancers, including SCLC, and contributing to cancer progression and metastasis through its important role in cell proliferation, survival, adhesion, spreading, migration, and invasion. FAK also plays a role in tumor immune evasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, DNA damage repair, radioresistance, and regulation of cancer stem cells. FAK is of particular interest in SCLC, being known for its aggressiveness. The inhibition of FAK in SCLC cell lines demonstrated significative decrease in cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, and induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In this review, we will focus on the role of FAK in cancer cells and their microenvironment, and its potential as a therapeutic target in SCLC.

Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments: A systematic literature review (SLR)

OBJECTIVES

SCLC makes up approximately 15% of all lung carcinomas and is characterized by relatively aggressive spread and poorer prognosis compared to other lung cancers. Treatment options are limited, and their efficacy in randomized trials is poor, whilst outcomes in clinical practice remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of SCLC treatments.

METHODS

An SLR was conducted across nine databases accessed through OVID, capturing observational, non-randomized studies published between 01/2006-11/2018. In total, 554 abstracts were retrieved and systematically screened for eligibility. The eligible publications included effectiveness and tolerability data from adult SCLC patients (at any line of therapy). Additional grey literature searches were conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-three publications were included in this review-data from first-line therapies were captured most often (n = 32), while data from second (n = 14) and third line (n = 7) and beyond (n = 7) were less frequent. The publications reported primarily on chemotherapy/radiotherapy. The majority of publications lacked robustness and only 14/43 conducted statistical analyses or controlled for bias. Median OS for the largest SCLC populations were 9.6 months at first line (n = 23,535) and 4.9 months at second line (n = 254) for treatment with chemotherapy, and 4.7 months at third line (n = 120) for predominantly platinum-based chemotherapy or cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/vincristine. Hematologic toxicities (such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia) were the most frequently reported TRAEs (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world treatment effectiveness and tolerability data were fragmented and inconsistently reported, and available publications were primarily of poor quality and lacked statistical analyses. This SLR showed limited treatment options and poor OS in SCLC, with no treatment option being clearly superior. TRAEs additionally increased the burden of this already challenging disease. Recent data suggest real-world outcomes are even poorer that those reported in clinical trials, and that novel therapies are needed to offer new treatment options for patients.

2017-2018 Scientific Advances in Thoracic Oncology: Small Cell Lung Cancer

SCLC remains an aggressive, deadly cancer with only modest effect on survival from standard chemotherapy. However, with the advent of immunotherapy and comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiling, multiple new targets are showing promise in the clinical arena, and just recently programmed death ligand 1 inhibition has been shown to improve the efficacy of standard chemotherapy in extended-disease SCLC. Our increasing understanding of the interactions between different pathways will enable more tailored immunotherapy and targeted therapies based on specific biomarkers and rational combinations. Here we discuss the preclinical and clinical strides in 2017 and 2018 that put us on the threshold of a new era in therapeutics and will, it is hoped, translate into significant improvements in survival.

Therapeutic Potential of Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase regulating cell proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion, which is overexpressed and/or activated in several cancers, including SCLC. We wanted to determine whether FAK contributes to SCLC aggressive behavior. We first evaluated the effect of FAK small-molecule inhibitor PF-573,228 in NCI-H82, NCI-H146, NCI-H196, and NCI-H446 SCLC cell lines. PF-573,228 (0.1-5 μmol/L) inhibited FAK activity by decreasing phospho-FAK (Tyr397), without modifying total FAK expression. PF-573,228 decreased proliferation, decreased DNA synthesis, induced cell-cycle arrest in G₂-M phases, and increased apoptosis in all cell lines. PF-573,228 also decreased motility in adherent cell lines. To make sure that these effects were not off-target, we then used a genetic method to inhibit FAK in NCI-H82 and NCI-H446, namely stable transduction with FAK shRNA and/or FAK-related nonkinase (FRNK), a splice variant lacking the N-terminal and kinase domains. Although FAK shRNA transduction decreased total and phospho-FAK (Tyr397) expression, it did not affect proliferation, DNA synthesis, or progression through cell cycle. However, restoration of FAK-targeting (FAT) domain (attached to focal adhesion complex where it inhibits pro-proliferative proteins such as Rac-1) by FRNK transduction inhibited proliferation, DNA synthesis, and induced apoptosis. Moreover, although FAK shRNA transduction increased active Rac1 level, FRNK reexpression in cells previously transduced with FAK shRNA decreased it. Therefore, FAK appears important in SCLC biology and targeting its kinase domain may have a therapeutic potential, while targeting its FAT domain should be avoided to prevent Rac1-mediated protumoral activity.

The effect of age on referral to an oncologist and receipt of chemotherapy among small cell lung cancer patients in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVES

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents a significant health burden. There is a lack of information about patterns of referral and treatment for older patients over 70 years of age, in comparison to younger patients with SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry, Canada. All cases of SCLC diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2010 were eligible. Data were extracted on demographic variables, treatment and outcome. Logistic regression analyses were performed as appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 9021 cases of SCLC, with 10% of cases ≥80 years and 32.8% of cases aged 70-79 years and 53% male. Older patients were less likely to be referred to a medical oncologist (OR 0.28 ≥ 80 years, OR 0.60 70-79 years) and less likely to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.19 ≥ 80 years, OR 0.52 70-79 years) compared to younger patients (age < 70). Age, higher comorbidity and prior receipt of home care services were all prognostic of a lower likelihood of referral to a medical oncologist and receipt of chemotherapy. Local health region was also prognostic for referral to and receipt of chemotherapy, indicative of significant regional variation in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with SCLC are less likely to be referred for treatment and less likely to receive treatment than younger patients. These data represent a potential gap in knowledge translation.

Impact of baseline characteristics on extensive-stage SCLC patients treated with etoposide/carboplatin: A secondary analysis of a phase III study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the impact of baseline characteristics on the outcomes of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients recruited into a clinical trial.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the control arm (etoposide/carboplatin arm) of the 'NCT00363415' study which is a phase III study conducted between 2006 and 2007. Univariate analysis of factors affecting overall and progression-free survival (PFS) was conducted through Cox regression analysis [including age, race, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, body mass index, Lactate dehydrogenase, number of metastatic sites and brain metastases]. Factors with P < .05 in the univariate analysis were then included in the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

All patients within the control arm (etoposide/carboplatin) were included in the analysis (N = 455 patients). The following factors were predictive of worse overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (P < .05): performance score = 2, LDH > upper limit of normal and ≥3 metastatic sites. Multivariate Cox regression analysis incorporating these three factors showed that only number of metastatic sites predicts worse OS (P < .0001). Likewise, the following factors were associated with worse PFS in univariate analysis (P < .05): performance score = 2 and ≥ 3 metastatic sites predict worse PFS (P < .05). Multivariate analysis incorporating these two factors showed that only number of metastatic sites predicts worse PFS (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Number of metastatic sites is the most important predictive factor for overall and PFS among patients with extensive-stage SCLC treated with systemic chemotherapy within a clinical trial.

The Economic Burden of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), the most aggressive form of lung carcinoma, represents approximately 15% of all lung cancers; however, the economic and healthcare burden of SCLC is not well-defined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the impact of SCLC on healthcare costs through a systematic literature review (SLR).

METHODS

Using the OVID search engine, the SLR was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, EconLIT and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED). Searches were limited to studies published between January 2005 and 24 February 2016, and excluded preclinical studies. Additional internet-based searches were conducted. In total, 229 abstracts were retrieved and systematically screened for eligibility, with 17 publications retained.

RESULTS

The majority of publications provided data on limited and extensive disease of SCLC. The reported burden was categorised as direct costs and indirect costs, with the majority of the publications (n = 16) reporting on direct costs and one reporting on both direct and indirect costs. The only indirect costs reported for SCLC were lost productivity (premature mortality costs) and caregiver burden. Chemotherapy, diagnostic costs and treatment costs were identified as significant costs when managing SCLC patients, including the associated treatment costs such as hospitalisation, nurse visits, emergency room visits, follow-up appointments and outpatient care.

CONCLUSIONS

SCLC and its treatment have a substantial impact on costs. The scarcity and heterogeneity of economic cost data negated meaningful cost comparison, highlighting the need for further research. Capturing the economic burden of SCLC may help patients and clinicians make informed treatment choices and improve SCLC management.

Proceedings of the NASHNP Companion Meeting, March 18th, 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada: Salivary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma-An Overview of a Rare Disease with an Emphasis on Determining Tumor Origin

Salivary neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and the overwhelming majority is high-grade. The parotid gland is the most commonly involved site followed by the submandibular gland. Most arise de novo but rare examples occurring as a high-grade transformation of another type of salivary gland neoplasm exist. There is significant morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with neuroendocrine carcinomas of other sites, especially the skin. Like cutaneous neuroendocrine (or Merkel cell) carcinomas, approximately three-fourths are cytokeratin 20 positive. Cytokeratin 20 positive salivary neuroendocrine carcinomas are often referred to as being of the 'Merkel cell type' since most other non-cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinomas are cytokeratin 20 negative. Salivary neuroendocrine carcinomas may be challenging to separate from Merkel cell carcinomas of the head and neck on pathologic grounds because the latter often metastasize to the parotid gland. Clinical history is often relied upon to separate primary salivary tumors from cutaneous metastases but may not be helpful in all cases. Here we review the clinical, pathologic and molecular features of salivary neuroendocrine carcinomas focusing on high-grade major salivary gland tumors. The difficulty in separating salivary tumors from metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma will be highlighted.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly progressive cancer that often debilitates patients within months of detection and quickly becomes refractory to the limited options of therapy. While SCLC is not generally considered an immunogenic tumor, clinical experience suggests that patients with robust immune response manifesting as paraneoplastic syndrome are more likely to present with limited stage of the disease and tend to have a better prognosis. Monoclonal antibodies targeting critical negative regulators of immune response, so called immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD-1) have expanded the application of immune-based therapies to increasing number of advanced stage cancers. These agents overcome the inhibitory immune signals leading to a heightened immune response against cancer cells. These immune checkpoint inhibitors have established efficacy leading to regulatory approval for their use in many cancer types including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evaluation of the CTLA-4 inhibitor, ipilimumab and PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in SCLC have shown encouraging signal but definitive studies are still ongoing. In this review, we discuss the rationale behind the use of checkpoint inhibitors in SCLC, contextualize the results of early trials of immunotherapy agents in SCLC and project the future evolution of this strategy.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with lung cancer

The incidence of brain metastases in patients with lung cancer has increased as a result of improved local and systemic control and better diagnosis from advances in brain imaging. Because brain metastases are responsible for life-threatening symptoms and serious impairment of quality of life, resulting in shortened survival, prophylactic cranial irradiation has been proposed in both small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to try to improve incidence of brain metastasis, survival, and eventually quality of life. Findings from randomised controlled trials and a meta-analysis have shown that prophylactic cranial irradiation not only reduces the incidence of brain metastases in patients with SCLC and with non-metastatic NSCLC, but also improves overall survival in patients with SCLC who respond to first-line treatment. Although prophylactic cranial irradiation is potentially associated with neurocognitive decline, this risk needs to be balanced against the potential benefit in terms of brain metastases incidence and survival. Several strategies to reduce neurotoxicity are being investigated.

Clinical outcomes of surgically resected combined small cell lung cancer: a two-institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The combined small cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) was rare and its clinicopathological characteristics had not been thoroughly described. The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors and survival in c-SCLC patients.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients with c-SCLC who underwent surgery between January 2009 and December 2013 in two institutions were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were identified. The most common pathology was combined SCLC and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC, N=46), followed by combined SCLC and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (N=32), combined SCLC and adenocarcinoma (AC) (N=12), and combined SCLC and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) (N=7). The overall survival (OS) rates of the entire cohort were 42.4% and 35.2% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified sex [female vs. male, hazards ratio (HR) =0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.79; P=0.010], age (<53 vs. >53 years, HR =0.28; 95% CI: 0.09-0.81; P=0.019), performance status (<2 vs. >2, HR =0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.32; P<0.001), combined non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) components (LCNEC vs. non-LCNEC, HR =3.00; 95% CI: 1.03-8.76; P=0.045), adjuvant therapy (yes vs. no, HR =0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.67; P=0.002) as significantly prognostic factors of OS in patients with complete resection and lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The mixed NSCLC components within c-SCLCs had a significant influence on the survival. Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in patients with complete resection and lymphadenectomy.

Small Cell Lung Cancer in a 20-year-old Non-Smoking Man with Systemic Sclerosis

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a neuroendocrine tumor, and the median age of onset is about 70 years old. A 20-year-old non-smoking man with known systemic sclerosis presented with discomfort in his left chest. Chest X-ray showed a mass shadow in the left upper zone. A transbronchial lung biopsy revealed small cell carcinoma, and imaging studies reached the diagnosis of extensive disease small cell lung cancer. He had concurrent interstitial lung disease with a non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern and anti-Scl-70 antibodies. He died eight months after the diagnosis during fifth-line chemotherapy. We herein report the youngest case to date of SCLC with systemic sclerosis.