Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral intensity-modulated radiotherapy for surgically treated squamous cell carcinoma of the palatine tonsil

Proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of p16 positive squamous cell tonsillar cancer - evaluation of toxicity and effectivity

PURPOSE

Patients with p16 positive tonsillar cancer (p16 + TC) have an excellent prognosis and long-life expectancy. Deintensification of therapy is a prevalent topic of discussion. Proton radiotherapy is one way to reduce radiation exposure and thus reduce acute and late toxicity. The aim is to evaluate treatment outcomes and toxicity of postoperative treatment with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

METHODS

Between September 2013 and November 2021, 47 patients with p16 + TC were treated postoperatively with IMPT. Median age was 54.9 (38.2-74.9) years, 31 were males and 16 were females. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma and underwent surgery as a primary treatment. Median dose of radiotherapy was 66 GyE in 33 fractions. Bilateral neck irradiation was used in 39 patients and unilateral in 8. Concomitant chemotherapy was applied in 24 patients.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 4.2 (0.15-9.64) years. Five-year overall survival, relapse free survival and local control were 95.7%, 97.8% and 100%. The most common acute toxicities were dermatitis and mucositis, with grade 2 + in 61.7% and 70.2% of patients. No acute percutaneous gastrostomy insertion was necessary and intravenous rehydration was used in 12.8% of patients. The most common late toxicity was grade 1 xerostomia in 70.2% of patients and grade 2 in 10.6% of patients. Subcutaneous fibrosis of grades 2 and 3 occurred in 17.0% and 2.1% of patients, respectively. One patient developed late severe dysphagia and became PEG-dependent.

CONCLUSION

IMPT for the postoperative treatment of p16 + TC is feasible with excellent efficiency and acceptable acute and late toxicity.

Unilateral Neck Treatment with either Surgery and/or Radiotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma for the Tonsil

INTRODUCTION

Strategies for treatment of tonsil carcinoma are under active investigation. Limiting surgical and radiation treatment volumes to the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck in appropriately selected patients are one such approach. Here, we present our institutional experience with treatment through ipsilateral surgical or radiotherapeutic neck management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database of patients with tonsil carcinoma treated from 2012 to 2020. Patients were included for analysis if they received definitive radiation therapy (RT), definitive surgery (S), or surgery with postoperative radiation therapy (S-PORT) and whose treatment volumes were limited to the primary tumor and involved/elective ipsilateral neck. Patients who received radiation and/or surgery to the contralateral neck (including those with bilateral nodal involvement), as well as patients with metastatic disease, were excluded. Clinical factors including T- and N-stage (AJCC 7th edition), and HPV status (by p16 and/or HPV DNA PCR) were recorded, as were pathologic factors (when applicable) including margin status, extracapsular extension (ECE), lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) at 2 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients were treated with unilateral neck approaches: S (n = 49), RT (n = 10), and S+PORT (n = 12). Among these patients, 32, 36, and 3 had T1, T2, and T3 disease, respectively. N-stage was N0, N1, N2a, N2b, and N3 in 22, 20, 5, 23, and 1 patient(s), respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 12 patients. From those with recorded risk factors, 86% were HPV positive, 20% had LVSI, 7% had PNI, 13% had ECE, and 5% had positive margins. From a median follow-up of 27 months, local, regional, and distant failures occurred in 5, 6, and 5 patients, respectively. No contralateral neck failures were recorded. At 2 years, OS, PFS, and LRC were 92% (95% CI 85-99%), 85% (95% CI 75-95%), and 88% (95% CI 80-98%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early T-stage tonsil carcinoma, treatment of the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck is associated with acceptable OS, PFS, and LRC. In this population, the risk of contralateral neck failure is likely very low regardless of primary treatment modality. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of limiting treatment extent, either surgical or radiotherapeutic, to the unilateral neck.

Unilateral radiotherapy for tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes

PURPOSE

For tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes, the safety and efficacy of unilateral radiotherapy (RT) have long been a topic of debate. We performed retrospective analyses of patients having ipsilateral neck lymph nodes treated with unilateral RT in two tertiary referral hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study accrued 29 patients who were diagnosed as well-lateralized tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes and underwent unilateral RT from March 2000 to March 2020. Patients underwent treatment with one of the following options or a combination of them: induction chemotherapy, surgery, RT, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We analyzed the recurrence pattern and survival with special attention to contralateral neck failure. Also, treatment-related toxicities were compared with a 1:1 matched cohort of those who received bilateral RT, using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 68 months, no contralateral neck failure was observed. Five-year actuarial locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were 85.6%, 91.8%, and 92.7%, respectively. Both the acute and chronic grade 2 xerostomia occurred in 10.3% of the patients. When the toxicity for unilateral RT was compared to that of bilateral RT using a propensity score-matched cohort, a significantly lower rate of acute xerostomia was observed in unilateral RT group (55.1% vs. 82.7%, p=0.002), primarily at grade 2 level (10.3% vs. 51.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that unilateral RT can be safely performed in well-lateralized tonsillar cancer patients with multiple ipsilateral neck lymph nodes.

Routine Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Head and Neck Cancers with Bilateral Neck Irradiation: A Regional Cancer Experience in New Zealand

INTRODUCTION

Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are particularly susceptible to dysphagia and malnutrition. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is a method used to manage these issues, but practices vary among institutions. At Midcentral District Health Board, patients receiving radiotherapy to the primary and bilateral neck regions routinely undergo prophylactic PEG placement. This study aimed to review the nutritional and PEG-related outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

Records of 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Their demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics were recorded. We evaluated patient weight loss, non-elective hospitalisation, treatment interruption rates, PEG-related complications, usage, dependency rates and late dysphagia rates.

RESULTS

Oropharyngeal cancers were the most common primary site (61.2%), and 83.7% of patients received primary chemoradiotherapy. Mean weight loss at treatment completion was 5.6% ± 4.3 (4.6 kg ± 3.9). The rate of non-elective hospitalisations was 26.5%, and only 2% of patients had treatment interruptions. Peristomal infection was the most frequent PEG complication (20.4%). No PEG-related mortality was reported. Median duration of PEG dependency was 97 days (14-388 days). Two patients remained permanently dependent at 3 years due to grade 3 dysphagia, and six patients experienced grade ≥2 late dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that prophylactic PEG tube placement was relatively safe, with a high utilisation rate and low long-term dependence on PEG tubes after treatment completion. However, complications related to their use should be addressed through a multidisciplinary approach, with careful assessment by clinicians. The weight loss and hospitalisation rates observed were consistent with earlier studies that utilised prophylactic PEG tubes.

Association of ipsilateral radiation therapy with contralateral lymph node failure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (INRT) is controversial in some patients with oral cavity cancer due to concern for contralateral neck failure (CNF).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed and data were extracted following PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were the rate of CNF following INRT and the rates of CNF by AJCC 7th ed. tumor and nodal staging.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies consisting of 1825 patients were identified. Among the 805 patients treated with INRT, the rate of CNF was 5.7%. Patients with T4 tumors constituted 56% of all CNF cases. The rate of CNF increased by N stage (N0: 1.2%; N1: 3.8%; N2-N3: 17.4%) and was significantly higher for patients with N2-N3 than N0-N1 disease (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

INRT is associated with an overall low risk of CNF in well-selected patients with N0-N1 disease. Patients with N2-3 and/or T4 disease should receive bilateral RT due to increased risk of CNF following INRT.

Low contralateral neck recurrence risk with ipsilateral neck radiotherapy in N2b tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To characterize factors including nodal burden, pre-treatment imaging, and other patient factors which may influence the role of ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (IRT) in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with multiple involved ipsilateral nodes.

METHODS

Patients with cT1-2N0-2bM0 (AJCC 7th edition) tonsillar SCC treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) at Duke University Medical Center from 1/1/1990-10/1/2019 were identified. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared between those that received bilateral neck RT (BRT) versus IRT. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. A subset analysis of patients with N2b disease was performed. Patterns of recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

120 patients with cT1-2N0-2b tonsillar SCC were identified, including 71 with N2b disease (BRT: n = 30; IRT: n = 41). Median follow-up was 80 months (range: 7-209). No N2b patients who received IRT had > 1 cm of soft palate/base of tongue extension. N2b patients treated with IRT had a median of 3 (range 2-9) involved lymph nodes, with median largest nodal dimension of 2.8 cm (range 1.3-4.8 cm). 93 % of N2b patients who received IRT had staging by PET/CT, and 100 % received IMRT. For N2b patients treated with IRT, there were no contralateral neck recurrences, and 10 year RFS was 95 % (95 % CI 82 %-98 %).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients treated with IRT for well-lateralized N2b tonsillar SCC, we observed high rates of local control with no observed contralateral neck recurrence. These data suggest that BRT is not universally necessary for patients with multiple involved ipsilateral nodes, particularly in the setting of baseline staging with PET/CT.

Integrating Immunotherapy into Multimodal Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis, with a significant risk of progression or death despite multimodal treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death receptor-1 (PD1) have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for recurrent/metastatic disease, improving overall survival in both the first- and second-line palliative settings. This success has driven the investigation of treatment strategies incorporating immunotherapy earlier into the multimodal curative-intent or salvage treatment of both locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. This review encompassed the following three subjects, with a focus on recently reported and ongoing clinical trials: (1) the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to surgery for locally advanced HNSCC, (2) the use of immunochemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancers, and (3) novel uses of immunotherapy in the salvage of recurrent/metastatic HNSCC via a combined modality, including reirradiation paradigms. The results of these studies are eagerly awaited to improve patient outcomes in this challenging disease.

Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Tonsillar Carcinoma Treated With Unilateral and Bilateral Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy-A Substudy From TROG 12.01

PURPOSE

The aim of this TROG 12.01 substudy was to report longitudinal variations in patient- (PRO) and clinician-reported outcomes based on receipt of unilateral (URT) or bilateral radiation therapy (BRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with lateralized T1-2 N1-2b human papillomavirus-associated tonsillar carcinoma (AJCC7) enrolled on TROG 12.01 were eligible. The primary endpoint was patient-reported radiation symptom severity score (MDASI-RSS) at 2 years, a composite of 9 MDASI-Head and Neck (HN) symptom items. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported symptom burden and interference (MDASI-HN), quality of life (FACT-HN), emotional distress (HADS), return to work (RTW), clinician-reported performance status scale (PSS-HN), and late adverse events (CTCAE). Mean MDASI-RSS, symptom severity (MDASI-SS), symptom interference (MDASI-SI) and selected single items were compared 1 week, 3 months, and 2 years post-RT.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were eligible for analysis (26 URT, 48 BRT). Median follow-up was 3.7 years (1.8-5.2 years). Sociodemographic, staging, and treatment variables were mostly balanced, with larger primaries observed in the BRT group. Four regional failures were reported (3 URT, 1 BRT), including one isolated contralateral regional failure in the URT cohort. Mean MDASI-RSS scores did not differ at 2 years (URT vs BRT, 1.1 vs 1.3; difference 0.1 [95% CI: -0.7 to 0.9], P = .75) or at any other time points for the MDASI-RSS, MDASI-SS, and MDASI-SI scores, except for worse MDASI-SI 1 week after treatment in the BRT group (4.7 vs 5.6). Fatigue (6.6 vs 5.4) at 1 week and dry mouth (3.5 vs 2.0) at 2 years were also worse in the BRT group. FACT-HN, HADS, RTW, PSS-HN, and CTCAE results were similar across the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this favorable-risk cohort, treatment laterality resulted in fewer differences than anticipated in patient-reported or clinician-reported outcomes. Two years after treatment patients treated with BRT reported significantly worse dry mouth. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the impact of treatment laterality on late effects.

AIRO GORTEC consensus on postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk early stages oral squamous cell cancers (OSCC)

Evidence on the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) remains inconclusive. Members of a task force from two national radio-oncology Associations (AIRO and GORTEC) defined 14 clinically relevant questions to identify "gray areas" pertinent to the indication for PORT in this clinical setting. Consequently, a literature review was performed on the topic. The resulting statements were then rated by an Expert Panel (EP) using a modified Delphi method. Only radiation oncologists were part of the discussion and voting on the scenarios. There was agreement on the 14 statements at the first round of voting. The task force then decided to propose clinical cases for the two more controversial statements that had received a lower agreement to better capture the Experts' attitudes. The clinical cases highlighted a more significant decisional heterogeneity. However, the good level of consensus reached among the two Associations gives relevant support in informing clinical choices while acknowledging general indications cannot fit all clinical situations and do not replace multidisciplinary discussion.

Human Papillomavirus-Related Non-Metastatic Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Current Local Treatment Options and Future Perspectives

Over the last two decades, human papillomavirus (HPV) has caused a new pandemic of cancer in many urban areas across the world. The new entity, HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), has been at the center of scientific attention ever since, not only due to its distinct biological behavior, but also because of its significantly better prognosis than observed in its HPV-negative counterpart. The very good treatment outcomes of the disease after primary therapy (minimally-invasive surgery, radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy) resulted in the creation of a separate staging system, reflecting this excellent prognosis. A substantial proportion of newly diagnosed HPV-driven OPSCC is diagnosed in stage I or II, where long-term survival is observed worldwide. Deintensification of the primary therapeutic methods, aiming at a reduction of long-term toxicity in survivors, has emerged, and the quality of life of the patient after treatment has become a key-point in many clinical trials. Current treatment recommendations for the treatment of HPV-driven OPSCC do not differ significantly from HPV-negative OPSCC; however, the results of randomized trials are eagerly awaited and deemed necessary, in order to include deintensification into standard clinical practice.

Head and neck cancers volume reduction: should we reduce our prophylactic node radiation to spare the antitumor immune response?

Radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer classically include large prophylactic node volume. However, the use of these large volumes can be responsible for significant toxicity. Furthermore, the disappointing results of radioimmunotherapy combinations in head and neck tumors raise concerns about radiotherapy's potential negative impact on the immune response when large lymph node volumes are treated. Besides, in other tumor locations, such as lung cancers, the volumes of elective irradiation have been considerably reduced, with the same local control as before. This opinion piece reviews the current state of radiation volumes in head and neck cancers, the rationale for these volumes, the potential impact of radiotherapy on immune response, and the volume changes that would improve the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy combinations.

Unilateral Radiation Therapy for Tonsillar Cancer: Treatment Outcomes in the Era of Human Papillomavirus, Positron-Emission Tomography, and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate disease, survival, and toxic effects after unilateral radiation therapy treatment for tonsillar cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study was performed of patients treated at our institution within the period from 2000 to 2018. Summary statistics were used to assess the cohort by patient characteristics and treatments delivered. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 403 patients, including 343 (85%) with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of ipsilateral cervical nodal disease and 181 (45%) with multiple involved nodes. Human papillomavirus was detected in 294 (73%) tumors. Median follow-up time was 5.8 years. Disease relapse was infrequent with local recurrence in 9 (2%) patients, neck recurrence in 13 (3%) patients, and recurrence in the unirradiated contralateral neck in 9 (2%) patients. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94% and 89%, respectively. Gastrostomy tubes were needed in 32 (9%) patients, and no patient had a feeding tube 6 months after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with well-lateralized tonsillar tumors and no clinically evident adenopathy of the contralateral neck, unilateral radiation therapy offers favorable rates of disease outcomes and a relatively low toxicity profile.

Dysphagia, hypothyroidism, and osteoradionecrosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the long-term side effects of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of all 688 HNC patients treated during 2010-2015 at Turku University Hospital, Finland. All patients who survived for more than a year after RT/chemoRT were included (n = 233). Intensity modulated RT (IMRT) with standard fractionation was applied in each case.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients (45%) reported persisting dysphagia, for which neck RT increased risk. Definitive neck RT to high-risk volume did not increase late toxicity risks compared to elective neck RT. Radiation-induced hypothyroidism (29%, n = 67) was more common among younger patients and females. Osteoradionecrosis (12%, n = 29) was more common in the oral cavity cancer group (20.7%, n = 92) compared to all other subsites.

CONCLUSIONS

Late toxicities of RT for HNC are common. Age, gender, tumor subsite, and neck RT affect susceptibility to long-term side effects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Occult lymph node metastasis in the contralateral neck of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and literature review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether contralateral cervical lymph node dissection is needed in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with contralateral cervical cN0.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and Cochrane Library databases up to August 14, 2021 for studies examining the contralateral neck occult metastasis rate of patients with ipsilateral clinical neck-negative (cN0) OPSCC and the contralateral neck occult metastasis rate of patients with ipsilateral clinical neck-positive (cN1, cN2a, cN2b) OPSCC. This rate is used to determine whether patients with contralateral cN0 OPSCC need contralateral cervical lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles, including 532 cases, were included in the analysis. When studying the rate of ipsilateral cervical occult metastasis in patients with ipsilateral cN0, 163 cases were included in 11 studies. The results showed that the rate of contralateral cervical occult lymph node metastasis in patients with ipsilateral cN0 was 0.6816% (95% CI 0.0000-4.4880 (P = 0.3005)). In the study of ipsilateral cN+ (cN1, cN2a, cN2b), a total of 369 cases of 10 articles were included in the analysis. The results showed that the rate of contralateral cervical occult lymph node metastasis in patients with ipsilateral cN+ was 11.4920% [95% CI 7.8944-15.5223 (P = 0.0000)].

CONCLUSION

For cancer treatment, the ultimate goal is to achieve the best control of cancer and the lowest complications. It seems unnecessary to intervene in the contralateral neck of patients with OPSCC with ipsilateral cN0. For OPSCC with ipsilateral cN+ , this index is a factor that cannot be ignored when making clinical decisions.

An comparison of acute toxicities and patient-reported outcomes between intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy after ipsilateral radiation for head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) demonstrates superior dose distribution over volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for sparing organs-at-risk (OARs) in ipsilateral radiotherapy. To determine a clinical benefit, assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and physician-reported toxicities alongside a dosimetric analysis is needed.

METHODS

Plans were analyzed for dosimetric differences. PROs were compared for patients undergoing ipsilateral curative-intent radiotherapy for tonsil and salivary gland cancers with VMAT or IMPT from 2015 to 2020. Physician-reported toxicities were compared.

RESULTS

In 40 patients, IMPT was associated with decreased dose to multiple OARs and less deterioration in the following PROs: pain, swallowing function, dry mouth, sticky saliva, sensory change, cough, speech, feeling ill, and social eating. Physician-reported toxicities demonstrated less oral pain.

CONCLUSION

IMPT is associated with decreased dose to OARs and less patient-reported acute deterioration in multiple head and neck domains. A strong consideration for IMPT in ipsilateral head and neck patients with cancer is warranted.

Contralateral nodal failures in oropharyngeal cancers after TORS and unilateral neck management: a retrospective study

Background

Report the incidence of contralateral nodal failure rates in well-lateralized oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with upfront surgery and unilateral neck management.

Methods

Lateralized oropharyngeal carcinomas treated with upfront surgery using transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and unilateral neck management (unilateral neck dissection ± unilateral radiation treatment) were identified. Primary endpoint was contralateral regional control (CRC). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-two patients were included. Pathologic T categories included 66% pT1, 31% pT2 and 3% pT3. Nodal diseases comprised 41% N0 and 47% N1 (AJCC 8th). Twenty-three (72%) patients had HPV related tumors. 3-years CRC, LC and OS were 100%, 96% (89–100) and 96% (CI 89–100). One patient developed a second primary with contralateral nodal disease. Only one patient died from another primary cancer.

Conclusion

In selected patients with lateralized oropharyngeal cancer, treatment with TORS and ipsilateral management of the neck may be oncologically safe without significant risk of contralateral failure.

Level of evidence: Level 2.

Graphical abstract

Efficacy of Postoperative Unilateral Neck Irradiation in Patients with Buccal Mucosa Squamous Carcinoma with Extranodal Extension: A Propensity Score Analysis

Unilateral radiotherapy (RT) as a postoperative treatment for multiple ipsilateral lymph node (LN) metastases remains controversial. We investigated the efficacy of postoperative unilateral RT for buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) with extranodal extensions (ENEs). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 186 patients with ENE+ BMSCC who received postoperative RT during 1997-2016. Propensity score matching was used to establish comparable cohorts. The endpoints were contralateral nodal control (CLNC), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), local control (LC), and regional control (RC). After matching, 123 patients were selected for analysis; 45 (36.6%) and 78 (63.4%) patients underwent unilateral and bilateral RT, respectively. The median follow-up was 36.27 months. The survival outcomes in the unilateral and bilateral RT groups were similar: 3-year CLNC (85.6% vs. 89.1%, p = 0.748), OS (53.2% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.229), DFS (46.5% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.515), DMFS (70.7% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.499), LC (78.0% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.692), and RC (79.9% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.465). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, unilateral and bilateral RT showed comparable outcomes; the number of ENEs ≥ 4 was the only significant prognostic factor for all clinical outcomes. Using decision tree analysis, we classified our patients to have a low, intermediate, or high risk of contralateral failure based on three factors: number of ENEs, margin status, and tumor stage. In conclusion, postoperative unilateral RT did not worsen outcomes in patients with ENE+ BMSCC in this cohort. The decision tree model may assist physicians in optimizing and tailoring radiation fields.

A Rational Approach to Unilateral Neck RT for Head and Neck Cancers in the Era of Immunotherapy

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the definitive and adjuvant treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, standard courses of radiation therapy may contribute to the depletion of circulating lymphocytes and potentially attenuate optimal tumor antigen presentation that may be detrimental to the efficacy of novel immunotherapeutic agents. This review explores the advantages of restricting radiation to the primary tumor/tumor bed and ipsilateral elective neck as it pertains to the evolving field of immunotherapy.

Patient-reported quality of life and symptom burden measures in human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal cancer - A review of the literature and PRO methodology

The emergence of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPVOPC) has resulted in an explosion of clinical research offering reduced toxicity and improved health-related quality of life (HRQL) through treatment de-escalation. At the heart of this objective are patient-reported outcomes (PROs) which aim to quantify the patient experience, usually through the measurement of HRQL or symptom burden. A number of PRO measures (PROMs) are available to HNC researchers and selection of the optimal instrument relies on a detailed understanding of their content and psychometric properties matched to the clinical endpoint of interest. As PROMs become increasingly favoured as the primary or co-primary endpoints of interest in HNC clinical trials, particularly those focussed on HPVOPC, future treatment paradigms will be determined by these measures and it is imperative that they are applied with sophistication and rigor. This review draws attention to the limitations and challenges our specialty faces in PRO application, analysis and reporting. These shortfalls typically include a reliance on statistical rather than clinically relevant differences, multiple hypothesis testing, a lack of evidence-based minimal clinically important differences for the commonly used tools, as well as variations in PROM selection. The aim of this review is to provide: (1) an overview of PRO/PROM terminology and methodology in the HNC setting; (2) to provide a summary of HRQL and symptom burden reports in the HPVOPC literature; and (3) to draw attention to the unmet research need of refining PROM development, application and interpretation to guide our treatment decisions based on what matters to patients.

Unilateral versus bilateral nodal irradiation: Current evidence in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Cancers of the head and neck region often present with nodal involvement. There is a long-standing convention within the community of head and neck radiation oncology to irradiate both sides of the neck electively in almost all cases to include both macroscopic and microscopic disease extension (so called elective nodal volume). International guidelines for the selection and delineation of the elective lymph nodes were published in the early 2000s and were updated recently. However, diagnostic imaging techniques have improved the accuracy and reliability of nodal staging and as a result, small metastases that used to remain undetected and were thus in the past included in the elective nodal volume, will now be included in high-dose volumes. Furthermore, the elective nodal areas are situated close to the parotid glands, the submandibular glands and the swallowing muscles. Therefore, irradiation of a smaller, more selected volume of the elective nodes could reduce treatment-related toxicity. Several researchers consider the current bilateral elective neck irradiation strategies an overtreatment and show growing interest in a unilateral nodal irradiation in selected patients. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current evidence about the indications and benefits of unilateral nodal irradiation and the use of SPECT/CT-guided nodal irradiation in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Contralateral neck failure in oral tongue cancer: Outcomes from two centers using predefined treatment criteria

BACKGROUND

The objective was to determine the incidence of, and factors associated with contralateral neck failure (CNF) in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with OTSCC between 2007 and 2016 were included. The predefined policy of the contralateral neck included neck dissection (ND) where the primary tumor extended/crossed midline or the contralateral neck was involved; and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) where the primary tumor was ≤1 cm from midline/2 cm from tip.

RESULTS

This study included 258 patients. ND was ipsilateral 169 (66%) and bilateral 33 (13%). Fifty-five patients (21%) received ENI to the undissected contralateral neck. CNF occurred in 19 patients (7%) and was similar by treatment received. Utilizing this approach, we observed higher rates of CNF with increasing N classification, perineural invasion, extracapsular extension, and depth of invasion ≥6 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our institutional policy of treatment to the contralateral neck, a low rate of CNF (≤10%) was observed.

Risk and Rate of Occult Contralateral Nodal Disease in Surgically Treated Patients With Human Papillomavirus-Related Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Base of the Tongue

Importance

The optimal treatment strategy for patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) of the base of the tongue (BOT) has not been sufficiently studied.

Objective

To investigate the rate of and risk factors for occult contralateral nodal disease in patients with HPV-related BOT OPSCC undergoing transoral surgery and bilateral neck dissections.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective case series reviewed the medical records of patients with HPV-related BOT OPSCC who underwent transoral surgery and bilateral neck dissections from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2018, at the tertiary care center of Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis. Patients had a median follow-up of 30.0 months (interquartile range, 11.0-60.4 months). Patients with recurrent disease or multiple synchronous OPSCC primary tumors were excluded for a total of 89 patients. Data were analyzed from January 1 through June 1, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the rate of contralateral occult nodal disease. Secondary outcomes were potential risk factors for contralateral occult nodal disease and regional recurrence rates.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were included in the series, of whom 81 (91.0%) were men. The mean (SD) age was 60 (9) years. Overall, 34 patients (38.2%) had pathologic contralateral nodal metastases. Seventy patients had no clinical evidence of contralateral nodal disease. Of these 70, occult nodes were identified in 15 (21.4%). Risk of contralateral disease was higher when the primary tumor crossed midline (odds ratio, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.71-22.77). Of the 55 patients with no occult disease identified, only 2 (3.6%) received radiotherapy to the contralateral neck, and no regional recurrence of disease was noted.

Conclusions and Relevance

Given the rate of occult contralateral nodal disease of 21.4%, it appears that contralateral elective neck dissection or radiotherapy should be recommended in patients with HPV-related BOT OPSCC. Patients with a pathologically negative result of contralateral neck dissection may not benefit from radiotherapy to that nodal basin. Future prospective investigations should evaluate functional and oncologic outcomes of contralateral elective neck dissection compared with elective radiotherapy in the contralateral neck for HPV-related BOT OPSCC.

Ipsilateral radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil: American Radium Society appropriate use criteria executive summary

BACKGROUND

We conducted the current systemic review to provide up-to-date literature summary and optimal evidence-based recommendations for ipsilateral radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil.

METHODS

We performed literature search of peer-reviewed journals through PubMed. The search strategy and subject-specific keywords were developed based on the expert panel's consensus. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2020 with full text available on PubMed and restricted to the English language and human subjects were included. Several prespecified search terms were used to identify relevant publications and additional evidence published since the initial American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Ipsilateral Tonsil Radiation recommendation was finalized in 2012. The full bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed and irrelevant studies were removed.

RESULTS

The initial search and review returned 46 citations. The authors added three citations from bibliographies, websites, or books not found in the literature search. Of the 49 citations, 30 citations were retained for further detailed review, and 14 of them were added to the evidence table. Articles were removed from the bibliography if they were not relevant or generalizable to the topic, or focused on unknown primary disease. Several commonly encountered clinical case variants were created and panelists anonymously rated each treatment recommendation. The results were reviewed and disagreements discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel provided updated evidence and recommendations for ipsilateral radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil in the setting of primary radiation-based therapy and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. This committee did not reach agreements for some case variants due to a lack of strong evidence supporting specific treatment decisions, indicating a further need for research in these topics.

Early T1-T2 stage p16+ oropharyngeal tumours. Role of upfront transoral robotic surgery in de-escalation treatment strategies. A review of the current literature

Human papillomavirus is responsible of approximately 70% oropharyngeal tumours and is related with more favourable outcomes. It has led to an increasing interest for de-escalation treatment strategies such as Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS). A literature review was performed searching for the role of TORS as de-escalation modality of treatment in patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Special attention was paid to the potential advantage offered by TORS in reducing adjuvant radiation therapy. Six questions were formulated. 67 studies were selected. Several trials analysing the role of upfront TORS to treat early stage p16+ OPSCC and the possibility of reducing the adjuvant radiotherapy were founded. A lot of studies based on the experience of single centres show promising results. Nevertheless to date no definitive data can be extrapolated. The continued investigation of this line of de-escalation therapy with randomized prospective clinical trials is needed.

Healthcare resource utilization following unilateral versus bilateral radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To describe differences in healthcare resource utilization between patients treated with bilateral vs. unilateral neck radiation therapy (RT) for lateralized oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS

A propensity score matching strategy was used to identify two otherwise clinically similar cohorts of tonsillar cancer patients treated with either bilateral or unilateral neck RT. Cohorts were matched based on similar propensity scores for age, sex, ECOG performance status, pack-year smoking history, cT-category, cN-category, HPV-status, and use of concurrent chemotherapy. Short term (from start of RT to 3 months following end of RT) resource utilization included: 1) outpatient supportive care visits, 2) hospital admission, and 3) interventions (feeding tube insertion and outpatient intravenous hydration). Long-term resource utilization included feeding tube dependency at 1-year.

RESULTS

Among 559 patients with tonsillar cancer treated between 2004-2017, propensity score matching identified a unilateral neck RT cohort (n = 81) and bilateral neck RT cohort (n = 81) with similar clinical and treatment characteristics. Bilateral neck RT was associated with a higher likelihood of hospitalization (33% vs 12%, p < 0.01), outpatient IV hydration (33% vs 17%, p = 0.03), and feeding tube insertion (33% vs 10%, p < 0.001); a greater number of total days of hospitalization (110 vs 47 days, p < 0.01) and outpatient IV hydration (135 vs 72 days, p = 0.02); and higher total number of supportive clinic visits (1226 vs 1053 days, p = 0.04). In the long-term, bilateral RT was associated with higher rate of feeding tube dependency at 1-year (7% vs 0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral RT for tonsillar cancer resulted in significant increase in health resource utilization.

Novel Strategies to Effectively De-escalate Curative-Intent Therapy for Patients With HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: Current and Future Directions

The treatment of patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) is rapidly evolving and challenging the standard of care of definitive radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin. There are numerous promising de-escalation strategies under investigation, including deintensified definitive chemoradiotherapy, transoral surgery followed by de-escalated adjuvant therapy, and induction chemotherapy followed by de-escalated locoregional therapy. Definitive radiotherapy alone or with cetuximab is not recommended for curative-intent treatment of patients with locally advanced HPV-OPC. The results of ongoing phase III studies are awaited to help answer key questions and address ongoing controversies to transform the treatment of patients with HPV-OPC. Strategies for de-escalation under investigation include the incorporation of immunotherapy and the use of novel biomarkers for patient selection for de-escalation.

Short-term and long-term unstimulated saliva flow following unilateral vs bilateral radiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare unstimulated saliva flow using 3-minute modified Schirmer test (MST) following bilateral vs unilateral radiotherapy (RT) in oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC).

METHODS

We reviewed OPC patients treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between 2011 and 2017. MST was measured at baseline, 1-/6-/12-/24-month post-RT. MST values were compared between bilateral-RT vs unilateral-RT groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) identified predictors of hyposalivation (MST < 25 mm).

RESULTS

Total 498 bilateral-RT and 36 unilateral-RT patients were eligible. The MST values at 1-/6-/12-/24-month post-RT were all significantly reduced from baseline for the entire cohort. Baseline unilateral-RT and bilateral-RT MST values (in mm) were similar (P = .2), but much higher for unilateral-RT 1-month (mean: 19.1 vs 13.0, P = .03), 6-month (20.5 vs 9.3, P < .001), 12-month (20.1 vs 11.9, P < .01), and 24-month post-RT (22.2 vs 13.9, P = .04). MVA confirmed that unilateral RT reduced the likelihood of hyposalivation vs bilateral RT (OR 2.36, P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Unilateral RT reduces unstimulated salivary flow in OPC patients.

The impact of tongue-deviating and tongue-depressing oral stents on long-term radiation-associated symptoms in oropharyngeal cancer survivors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the use of oral stents during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is associated with long-term patient reported symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was obtained from a prospective observational study of disease-free head and neck cancer survivors. Radiation-associated patient reported symptoms were assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN). Scores of ≥5 (11-point Likert scale, 0-10) were considered moderate/severe. Stratification was performed regarding IMRT volume (uni- versus bilateral neck) and stent utilization, with non-parametric analyses between groups.

RESULTS

462 OPC survivors formed the cohort (54% tonsil, 46% base of tongue primaries). A tongue-deviating stent was used in 17%, tongue-depressing stent in 46%, and no stent in 37%. Median prescribed dose to the high dose clinical target volume was 66.0 Gy. Median follow-up from RT to MDASI-HN assessment was 68 months. Twenty percent had received unilateral neck RT (all had tonsil primaries), in whom a significant improvement in the proportion of patients with moderate/severe taste impairment (2% vs. 15%, p = 0.047) and lack of appetite (0% vs. 9%, p = 0.019) was associated with the use of tongue-deviating stents compared to no oral stent. In those who had received bilateral neck RT, a significant improvement in the proportion of patients with moderate/severe difficulty swallowing/chewing was associated with use of a tongue-depressing stent (21% vs. 31% without oral stent, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Disease-site specific select use of oral stents during IMRT was associated with reduced long-term patient reported symptoms in OPC survivors.

Preservation of swallowing in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: examining radiation volume effects (PRESERVE): study protocol for a randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) are often treated with adjuvant radiation (RT) ± concomitant chemotherapy based on pathological findings. Standard RT volumes include all surgically dissected areas, including the tumour bed and dissected neck. RT has significant acute and long-term toxicities including odynophagia, dysphagia, dermatitis and fibrosis. The goal of this study is to assess the rate of regional failure with omission of radiation to the surgically dissected pathologically node negative (pN0) hemi-neck(s) compared to historical control, and to compare oncologic outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) profiles between standard RT volumes and omission of RT to the pN0 neck.

METHODS

This is a multicentre phase II study randomizing 90 patients with T1-4 N0-2 OCSCC with at least one pN0 hemi-neck in a 1:2 ratio between standard RT volumes and omission of RT to the pN0 hemi-neck(s). Patients will be stratified based on overall nodal status (nodal involvement vs. no nodal involvement) and use of concurrent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is regional failure in the pN0 hemi-neck(s); we hypothesize that a 2-year regional recurrence of 20% or less will be achieved. Secondary endpoints include overall and progression-free survival, local recurrence, rate of salvage therapy, toxicity and QoL.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide an assessment of omission of RT to the dissected pN0 hemi-neck(s) on oncologic outcomes, QoL and toxicity. Results will inform the design of future definitive phase III trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03997643 . Date of registration: June 25, 2019, Current version: 2.0 on July 11 2020.

Volume de-escalation in radiation therapy: state of the art and new perspectives

PURPOSE

New RT techniques and data emerging from follow-up for several tumor sites suggest that treatment volume de-escalation may permit to minimize therapy-related side effects and/or obtain better clinical outcomes. Here, we summarize the main evidence about volume de-escalation in RT.

METHOD

The relevant literature from PubMed was reviewed in this article. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for clinical trials related to the specific topic.

RESULTS

In Lymphoma, large-volume techniques (extended- and involved-field RT) are being successfully replaced by involved-site RT and involved-node RT. In head and neck carcinoma, spare a part of elective neck is controversial. In early breast cancer, partial breast irradiation has been established as a treatment option in low-risk patients. In pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy may be used to dose escalation. Stereotactic radiosurgery should be the treatment choice for patients with oligometastatic brain disease and a life expectancy of more than 3 months, and it should be considered an alternative to WBRT for patients with multiple brain metastases.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical trials are necessary to improve the identification of suitable patient cohorts and the extent of possible volume de-escalation that does not compromise tumor control.

Patient-reported quality of life and toxicity in unilateral and bilateral radiotherapy for early-stage human papillomavirus associated tonsillar carcinoma

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported health-related quality of life (QoL) and symptom burden in early stage tonsillar carcinoma patients treated with unilateral (URT) and bilateral radiotherapy (BRT).

Methods and materials

This is a secondary analysis of a larger study assessing patient reported outcomes in human papillomavirus (HPV) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Recruited patients were ≥12 months from completion of radiotherapy. This analysis included only patients with T1-2, N1-2b tonsil cancer and excluded patients with base of tongue involvement or recurrent disease. QoL and patient reported toxicity was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 module and the MDASI-HN.

Results

Patients were enrolled from November 2018 to May 2019. Of the 136 patients recruited to the main study, 43 were eligible for this substudy (22 URT, 21 BRT), with a median age and follow up of 58.2 and 3.0 years respectively. The two groups were balanced with respect to patient, tumor and treatment factors with the exception of higher rates of T2 disease (27% v 71%, p = 0.006) and more extensive GTV nodal volumes (11.0 v 25.5cc, p = 0.006) in the BRT group.BRT patients had lower global health status/QoL (84 v 69, p = 0.0005) and social functioning scores (93 vs 78, p = 0.033) on the EORTC QLQ-C30, and higher symptom severity (0.6 vs. 2.0, p = 0.001) and symptom interference scores (0.8 vs. 2.0, p = 0.010) on the MDASI-HN. Four of the six largest differences observed on MDASI-HN items were attributable to radiotherapy technique (dry mouth, mucous, difficulty swallowing/chewing and taste), with corresponding dose differences to the respective organs (contralateral parotid, oral cavity and pharyngeal constrictors). In every instance, severity of symptoms was worse on average for patients treated with BRT.

Conclusions

In the highly conformal radiotherapy era, BRT in early HPV tonsillar cancer survivors has an enduring impact on long-term QoL and toxicity.

Current Standards for Organ Preservation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer and Evolving Strategies for Favorable-Risk and Platinum-Ineligible Populations

OPINION STATEMENT

Standard-of-care treatment for the majority of patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is either upfront surgery followed by adjuvant treatment as indicated by intraoperative or pathologic findings or concurrent chemoradiation reserving surgical salvage for non-responsive disease. An attempt at upfront complete resection should be pursued if feasible in patients with oral cavity or paranasal sinus primary tumors. Given multimodality treatment paradigms, patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN should be managed in a multidisciplinary setting. Modern radiation therapy, whether postoperative or definitive in intent, is based on target delineation guided by high-quality imaging, using an intensity-modulated radiation technique to spare organs at risk. In select groups of low-risk patients, most notably those with HPV-associated oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC), several treatment deintensification approaches are currently under investigation. Major experimental strategies within this non-surgical organ preservation domain include reductions in the intensity of the chemotherapy or radiation therapy components of the chemoradiation program, use of induction chemotherapy, or imaging-based selection of patients eligible for deintensified radiation-based treatment. Of note, recent efforts to substitute cetuximab for cisplatin in low-risk HPV-associated OPSCC have demonstrated the inferiority of cetuximab to cisplatin in cisplatin-eligible patients, re-confirming cisplatin as the standard systemic therapy of choice in HNSCC. In patients who are not candidates for any type of cisplatin administration, carboplatin-based therapy or cetuximab remain options, and other non-cisplatin therapies are under investigation. Altered fractionation may be considered in patients who are not candidates for any type of systemic therapy. The role of immunotherapy in the management of locoregional SCCHN remains investigational.

Risk of post-operative, pre-radiotherapy contralateral neck recurrence in patients treated with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy for human papilloma virus-associated tonsil cancer

OBJECTIVE

One approach to reduce treatment-related morbidity for human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated tonsil cancer is omitting radiotherapy to the contralateral neck. Pathologic risk factors for early contralateral neck disease, however, are poorly understood. We report on the risk contralateral neck failures from the time of pre-operative diagnostic imaging to time of planning for adjuvant radiation in a single institution series of HPV-associated tonsillar cancer patients undergoing surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 123 patients with T1-T3 HPV-positive tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma treated between 2010 and 2016 with transoral robotic surgery and selective ipsilateral neck dissection followed by adjuvant RT. Contralateral neck recurrence was classified as the detection of a pathologic node in the contralateral neck prior to initiation of adjuvant RT.

RESULTS

Seven patients (5.7%) developed contralateral neck disease/failure between the time of pre-operative diagnostic neck imaging and time of planning of adjuvant radiation. Increased ratio of positive/resected nodes [odds ratio (OR) 1.073, p = 0.005] was significantly associated with increased risk of contralateral neck recurrence, with a trend found for close/positive margins (OR 5.355, p = 0.06), tumor size (OR 2.046, p = 0.09), and total number of nodes positive (OR 1.179, p = 0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who develop very early contralateral neck disease, between completion of ipsilateral neck dissection and the initiation of radiotherapy, have a higher ratio of positive nodes to total nodes resected in the ipsilateral neck. These findings suggest that proper selection of patients for omission of treatment of the contralateral, node-negative neck should be made with this in mind, with future studies needed to document the impact on toxicity and disease outcomes from such an approach.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Pathologic risk factors in the dissected, ipsilateral neck in patients with tonsil cancer may inform the risk of contralateral neck failure. Patient selection for future, prospective efforts to examine sparing of the contralateral neck need to be based with these risk factors in mind.

Eliminating Postoperative Radiation to the Pathologically Node-Negative Neck: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Phase II Study

PURPOSE

The volume treated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is a mediator of toxicity, and reduced volumes result in improved quality of life (QOL). In this phase II trial, treatment volumes were reduced by omitting PORT to the pathologically negative (PN0) neck in patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical resection and neck dissection with a PN0 neck and high-risk features mandating PORT to the primary and/or involved neck were eligible. The primary end point was greater than 90% disease control in the unirradiated neck. QOL was evaluated using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the University of Michigan patient-reported xerostomia questionnaire.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were enrolled, and 72 were evaluable. Median age was 56 years (range, 31 to 81 years); 58 patients were male, and 47 (65%) had a smoking history. Sites included oral cavity (n = 14), oropharynx (n = 37), hypopharynx (n = 4), larynx (n = 16), and unknown primary tumor (n = 1). According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (7^th edition), 67 patients (93%) had stage III/IV disease, and 71% of tumors involved or crossed midline. No patient had contralateral neck PORT. In 17 patients (24%), only the primary site was treated. At a median follow-up of 53 months, two patients experienced treatment failure of the PN0 unirradiated neck; they also experienced treatment failure locally. Unirradiated neck control was 97% (95% CI, 93.4% to 100.0%). Five-year rates of local control, regional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 84%, 93%, 60%, and 64%, respectively. QOL measures were not significantly different from baseline at 12 and 24 months post-PORT (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Eliminating PORT to the PN0 neck resulted in excellent control rates in the unirradiated neck without long-term adverse effects on global QOL.

Point/Counterpoint: Do We De-escalate Treatment of HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer Now? And How?

HPV-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) continues to increase in incidence across the globe. Multimodality treatment offers a high likelihood of cure in HPV+ OPC but comes at a high cost of treatment-related morbidity. As a result, de-escalation of treatment to limit toxicity without compromising high cure rates has emerged as a major trend in head and neck cancer clinical research. Primary surgery with minimally invasive resection of the primary disease may allow for the elimination of chemotherapy and decrease radiation dose intensity. Primary dose-reduced radiation, with or without systemic therapy, is also under study, as is replacing concurrent cisplatin with newer systemic agents. Numerous institutional series and phase II trials have been presented, and the first generation of de-escalation randomized phase III trials have now been published. The various combinatorial multimodality strategies to achieve less intensive and toxic therapy are many. Has the time come for de-escalation as a standard approach to HPV+ OPC? The pros and cons, as well as the best approaches for de-escalated treatment of HPV+ OPC, are debated here.

Association of Posttreatment Lymphopenia and Elevated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Human Papillomavirus-Negative Oropharyngeal Cancers

IMPORTANCE

Better biomarkers are needed for human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) to identify patients at risk of recurrence. Lymphopenia and an elevated ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR) have been associated with poor disease outcomes in a number of solid tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that postradiotherapy lymphopenia and elevated NLR are associated with poor clinical outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-institution retrospective analysis included patients with HPV-negative OPC treated from January 1, 1997, through January 4, 2017. Median follow-up was 37 months (range, 2-197 months). A total of 108 patients with HPV-negative OPC and at least 1 complete blood cell count 2 to 12 months after the start of radiotherapy were included. Data were analyzed from August 26 to September 7, 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgery followed by radiotherapy vs definitive radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Absolute lymphocyte (ALC) and absolute neutrophil (ANC) counts were tested as variables affecting locoregional control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of a total of 108 patients included in the analysis (87.0% male; mean age, 56 years [range, 35-84 years]), 57 received surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy and 51 received definitive radiotherapy. During treatment, 67 of 79 patients (84.8%) had grades 3 to 4 lymphopenia and 17 of 79 (21.5%) had grade 4 lymphopenia. The ANC recovered by 6 months after radiotherapy, but ALC remained depressed to 1 year after radiotherapy. Posttreatment lymphopenia and elevated NLR were associated with worse recurrence-free and overall survival. The estimated 3-year LRC in patients with and without grades 3 to 4 lymphopenia at 3 months after radiotherapy start was 73% vs 82% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.19-1.8); estimated 3-year recurrence-free survival, 36% vs 63% (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.87); and estimated 3-year overall survival, 34% vs 64% (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88). In multivariable analysis, an association with worse overall survival was found for definitive radiotherapy (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-7.1) and grades 3 to 4 lymphopenia (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.5) at 3 months after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Lymphopenia and NLR as early as 3 months after treatment start may serve as biomarkers of clinical outcomes in patients with HPV-negative OPC. These patients may benefit from adjuvant treatment intensification or closer surveillance.