Health care disparities among octogenarians and nonagenarians with stage III lung cancer

Disparities in Lung Cancer: A Targeted Literature Review Examining Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes in the United States

BACKGROUND

Although incidence and mortality of lung cancer have been decreasing, health disparities persist among historically marginalized Black, Hispanic, and Asian populations. A targeted literature review was performed to collate the evidence of health disparities among these historically marginalized patients with lung cancer in the U.S.

METHODS

Articles eligible for review included 1) indexed in PubMed®, 2) English language, 3) U.S. patients only, 4) real-world evidence studies, and 5) publications between January 1, 2018, and November 8, 2021.

RESULTS

Of 94 articles meeting selection criteria, 49 publications were selected, encompassing patient data predominantly between 2004 and 2016. Black patients were shown to develop lung cancer at an earlier age and were more likely to present with advanced-stage disease compared to White patients. Black patients were less likely to be eligible for/receive lung cancer screening, genetic testing for mutations, high-cost and systemic treatments, and surgical intervention compared to White patients. Disparities were also detected in survival, where Hispanic and Asian patients had lower mortality risks compared to White patients. Literature on survival outcomes between Black and White patients was inconclusive. Disparities related to sex, rurality, social support, socioeconomic status, education level, and insurance type were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Health disparities within the lung cancer population begin with initial screening and continue through survival outcomes, with reports persisting well into the latter portion of the past decade. These findings should serve as a call to action, raising awareness of persistent and ongoing inequities, particularly for marginalized populations.

Multiomics-Based Feature Extraction and Selection for the Prediction of Lung Cancer Survival

Lung cancer is a global health challenge, hindered by delayed diagnosis and the disease's complex molecular landscape. Accurate patient survival prediction is critical, motivating the exploration of various -omics datasets using machine learning methods. Leveraging multi-omics data, this study seeks to enhance the accuracy of survival prediction by proposing new feature extraction techniques combined with unbiased feature selection. Two lung adenocarcinoma multi-omics datasets, originating from the TCGA and CPTAC-3 projects, were employed for this purpose, emphasizing gene expression, methylation, and mutations as the most relevant data sources that provide features for the survival prediction models. Additionally, gene set aggregation was shown to be the most effective feature extraction method for mutation and copy number variation data. Using the TCGA dataset, we identified 32 molecular features that allowed the construction of a 2-year survival prediction model with an AUC of 0.839. The selected features were additionally tested on an independent CPTAC-3 dataset, achieving an AUC of 0.815 in nested cross-validation, which confirmed the robustness of the identified features.

Lung cancer outcomes in the elderly: potential disparity in screening

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyse outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients in the National Cancer Database with NSCLC from 2004 to 2017 grouped into 2 categories: 70-79 years (A) and 80-90 years (B). Patients with multiple malignancies were excluded. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated the overall survival for each age group based on stage.

RESULTS

In total, 466 051 patients were included. Less-invasive techniques (imaging and cytology) diagnosed cancer as a function of age: 14.6% in A vs 21.3% in B [P < 0.001, standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.175]. Clinical stage IA was least common in B (15%) compared to 17.3% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.079). Approximately 83.0% in B did not receive surgery compared to 70.0% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.299). Of the 83.0%, 8.0% were considered poor surgical candidates because of age or comorbidities compared with 6.2% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.299) For 71.0% in B, surgery was not the first treatment plan compared to 62.0% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.299). Survival curves showed worse prognosis for each clinical and pathologic stage for B compared to A.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients older than 80 years present less frequently as clinical stage IA, are less commonly offered surgical intervention and are more frequently diagnosed using less accurate measures. They also have worse outcomes for each stage compared to younger patients.

Treatment at Twilight: An Analysis of Therapy Patterns and Outcomes in Adults 80 Years and Older With Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC

Introduction

The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and factors influencing systemic treatment decisions in adults 80 years and older with NSCLC.

Methods

This was a retrospective National Cancer Database study evaluating outcomes in adults aged 80 years and older with advanced NSCLC. Patients were analyzed on the basis of systemic therapy, including none, chemotherapy or immunotherapy (IO) alone, and chemotherapy plus IO (chemotherapy + IO). Median overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess differences in outcomes, and OR with 95% CI was used to assess factors contributing to systemic therapy provision.

Results

Patients 80 years and older (OR = 1.135 [95% CI: 1.127-1.142], p = 0.000), females (OR = 1.129 [95% CI: 1.085-1.175], p < 0.001), blacks (OR = 1.272 [95% CI: 1.179-1.372], p < 0.001), non-Hispanic whites (OR = 1.210 [95% CI: 1.075-1.362], p = 0.002), and those with increasing Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score (p < 0.001) were less likely to receive systemic therapy. Median OS for no therapy, IO alone, chemotherapy alone, and chemotherapy plus IO was 2.63 (95% CI: 2.57-2.69), 10.68 (95% CI: 9.96-11.39), 12.35 (95% CI: 11.98-12.72), and 14.03 (95% CI: 13.87-14.88) months, respectively. In chemotherapy alone, mean OS was 1.12 months (95% CI: 0.55-1.70) (p < 0.001) longer with multiagent versus single agent. There was no difference between IO plus single agent versus IO plus multiagent chemotherapy (0.67 mo [95% CI -1.18 to 2.54], p = 1.00).

Conclusions

Age, comorbidities, patient race, and sex affected systemic therapy provision. Multiagent chemotherapy and chemotherapy plus IO significantly improved survival; with the latter, survival was similar with IO plus single or multiagent chemotherapy.

Nonadherence to Multimodality Cancer Treatment Guidelines in the United States

Purpose

Our purpose was to identify patients with cancer who do not receive guideline-concordant multimodality treatment and to identify factors that are associated with nonreceipt of guideline-concordant multimodality treatment.

Methods and Materials

Five cancers for which the multimodal guideline-concordant treatment (with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy) is clearly defined in national guidelines were selected from the National Cancer Database: (1) nonmetastatic anal cancer, (2) locally advanced cervical cancer, (3) nonmetastatic nasopharynx cancer, (4) locally advanced rectal cancer, and (5) locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) of receiving the guideline-concordant treatment versus not, adjusting for common confounding variables.

Results

178,005 patients with cancer were included: 32,214 anal, 54,485 rectal, 13,179 cervical, 5061 nasopharyngeal, and 73,066 lung. Overall, 162,514 (91%) received guideline-concordant treatment and 15,491 (9%) did not. Twenty-one percent of patients with cervical cancer, 10% of patients with rectal cancer, 7% of patients with lung cancer, 5% of patients with anal cancer, and 3% of patients with nasopharynx cancer did not receive guideline-concordant treatment. In general, patients who were older, with comorbid conditions, and who were evaluated at low-volume facilities (odds ratios > 1 with P < .05) were less likely to receive guideline-concordant treatment.

Conclusions

Nearly 1 in 10 patients in this cohort are not receiving appropriate multimodal cancer therapy. There appear to be significant disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment based on primary tumor site, age, comorbidities, and reporting facility.

Aging and Susceptibility to Pulmonary Disease

The lungs are continually subjected to noxious and inert substances, are immunologically active, and are in a constant state of damage and repair. This makes the pulmonary system particularly vulnerable to diseases of aging. Aging can be understood as random molecular damage that is unrepaired and accumulates over time, resulting in cellular defects and tissue dysfunction. The breakdown of cellular mechanisms, including stem cell exhaustion, genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alteration, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, altered intercellular communication, and changes in the extracellular matrix is thought to advance the aging process itself. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and cancers illustrate a pathologic breakdown in these mechanisms beyond normal aging. The immune system becomes less effective with advancing age. There is a low-level state of chronic inflammation termed inflammaging which is thought to be driven by immunosenescence, the changes in the innate and adaptive immune systems with advancing age that lead to dysregulation and decreased effectiveness of the immune system. These processes of aging lead to expected changes in the form and function of the respiratory system, most notably a loss of lung elasticity, decrease in respiratory muscle strength, increase in ventilation-perfusion mismatching, and stiffening of the vasculature. The astute clinician is aware of these expected findings and does not often attribute dyspnea to aging alone. Maintaining a low threshold to investigate for comorbid disease and understanding how pulmonary disease presents differently in the elderly than in younger adults can improve clinical outcomes. © 2022 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:3509-3522, 2022.

No limit to maximal lifespan in humans: how to beat a 122-year-old record

Although average human life expectancy is rising, the maximum lifespan is not increasing. Leading demographers claim that human lifespan is fixed at a natural limit around 122 years. However, there is no fixed limit in animals. In animals, anti-aging interventions (dietary restrictions, rapamycin, genetic manipulations) postpone age-related diseases and thus automatically extend maximum lifespan. In humans, anti-aging interventions have not been yet implemented. Instead, by treating individual diseases, medical interventions allow a patient to live longer (despite morbidity), expanding morbidity span. In contrast, slowly aging individuals (centenarians) enter very old age in good health, but, when diseases finally develop, they do not receive thorough medical care and die fast. Although the oldest old die from age-related diseases, death certificates often list "old age", meaning that diseases were not even diagnosed and even less treated. The concept of absolute compression of morbidity is misleading in humans (in truth, there is no other way to compress morbidity as by denying thorough medical care) and false in animals (in truth, anti-aging interventions do not condense morbidity, they postpone it). Anti-aging interventions such as rapamycin may potentially extend both healthspan and maximal lifespan in humans. Combining anti-aging medicine with cutting-edge medical care, regardless of chronological age, will extend maximal lifespan further.

Social Disparities in Lung Cancer

Social disparities in lung cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival have been studied using national databases, statewide registries, and institution-level data. Some disparities emerge consistently, such as lower adherence to treatment guidelines and worse survival by race and socioeconomic status, whereas other disparities are less well studied. A critical appraisal of current data is essential to increasing equity in lung cancer care.

Social Disparities in Thoracic Surgery Database Research: Implications and Impact

A complex relationship exists between health care disparities and large databases among the thoracic surgical patient population. Using the example of thoracic malignancies, the ability of investigations leveraging large databases and novel analytical approaches to highlight disparate access to care and discordant outcomes following treatment is illustrated. Large, widely used databases may not be representative of the thoracic surgical patient population as a whole, and caution must be used when interpreting and generalizing results gleaned from such database analyses. Ensuring appropriate representation of all relevant patient subgroups in research databases will improve external generalizability and scientific validity of future investigations.

Octogenarians may benefit from stage-specific small cell lung cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Our study investigates treatment profiles in octogenarian patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and assesses each treatment's role in a stage-specific manner.

METHODS

Patient data from individuals with SCLC aged 80 years and older between 1988 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database were extracted. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients with no treatment and different treatment groups were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method, with stratifications by stage. Cox Proportional Hazard model further identified independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 7,290 patients were included in this study. Notably, 3,358 (46.1%) patients did not receive active treatment. Compared with the no active treatment group, the CSS of patients who received treatment was significantly improved (median 6 vs. 0 months, P<0.001) and further validated in stage subgroups. Chemotherapy combined with local therapy was associated with the best CSS in regional and distant disease stages, with the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) being 0.30 (0.26-0.34) and 0.27 (0.25-0.30), respectively. Local therapy only appeared to confer better oncological outcomes (HR =0.33; 95% CI: 0.25-0.42) than chemotherapy only (HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.29-0.47) in the localized disease stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nearly half of octogenarians with SCLC did not receive active treatment in the real clinical setting, these patients may benefit from treatment. Chemotherapy combined with local therapy may provide the best treatment choice in octogenarians with advanced SCLC, while local therapy appears to play a more critical role in treating those with early-stage disease.

Comparison Between Health Insurance Claims and Electronic Health Records (EHRs) for Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The clinical landscape in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment has rapidly evolved in recent years. Real-world data (RWD) can provide insights into current clinical practice.

Objective

This study examined the patient characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with metastatic NSCLC using RWD sources.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims and electronic health records (EHRs). Adult patients treated for metastatic NSCLC during the period 2017 to September 2020 were followed from the earliest treatment date until a censoring event.

Results

The claims cohort included 7917 patients with a mean age of 70 years and a mean follow-up period of 373 days. The EHR cohort included 7087 patients with a mean age of 67 years and a mean follow-up period of 362 days. The five most common first-line therapies (LoT1) were the same for both cohorts: carboplatin + paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, carboplatin + pemetrexed + pembrolizumab, cisplatin + pemetrexed, and nivolumab. Mean LoT1 durations were 146 and 147 days in the claims and EHR cohorts, respectively. For patients who received a second LoT (LoT2), the five most common LoT2 were also the same in both cohorts: durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, carboplatin + pembrolizumab + pemetrexed, and carboplatin + pemetrexed. Mean LoT2 durations were 157 and 158 days in the claims and EHR cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions

LoTs between the claims and EHR cohorts were comparable and showed similar treatment patterns. Traditional platinum-containing chemotherapy was most common in LoT1, whereas programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors became the most common choices in LoT2. Our findings suggest that RWD can reliably provide up-to-date insight into current treatment modalities and indicate that new clinical evidence is rapidly adopted in patients with NSCLC.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus surgery in older patients with stage I lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection is the best option for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. However, older patients are less likely to receive curative treatment. Therefore, we compared long-term survival rates between surgical resection and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in older patients.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2016, 272 patients aged ≥75 years with clinical stage I lung cancer underwent surgical resection (n = 191) or SABR (n = 81). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. Overall survival, cumulative incidence of cancer-related death and recurrence were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort, 48 well-balanced pairs were extracted. An overall survival benefit was associated with surgery (surgery vs SABR = 65.9% vs 40.3%; P = 0.034); however, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of cancer-related death (P = 0.089) or recurrence (P = 0.111) between the 2 groups. Systemic dissemination was the dominant pattern of progression in both groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence of regional recurrence was significantly higher in the SABR group compared to the surgery group (surgery vs SABR = 0% vs 11.4%, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection provides better long-term survival compared to SABR in older patients with stage I lung cancer. Surgery should be considered for older patients aged ≥75 years who are appropriate candidates for surgery. SABR remains an alternative treatment with comparable cancer-related death and recurrence for patients unsuitable for surgery.

Overuse of Diagnostic Brain Imaging Among Patients With Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Among patients diagnosed with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of occult brain metastasis is low, and several professional societies recommend against brain imaging for staging purposes. The goal of this study was to characterize the use of brain imaging among Medicare patients diagnosed with stage IA NSCLC.

METHODS

Using data from linked SEER-Medicare claims, we identified patients diagnosed with AJCC 8th edition stage IA NSCLC in 2004 through 2013. Patients were classified as having received brain imaging if they underwent head CT or brain MRI from 1 month before to 3 months after diagnosis. We identified factors associated with receipt of brain imaging using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 13,809 patients with stage IA NSCLC, 3,417 (25%) underwent brain imaging at time of diagnosis. The rate of brain imaging increased over time, from 23.5% in 2004 to 28.7% in 2013 (P=.0006). There was significant variation in the use of brain imaging across hospital service areas, with rates ranging from 0% to 64.0%. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of brain imaging included older age (odds ratios [ORs] of 1.16 for 70-74 years, 1.13 for 75-79 years, 1.31 for 80-84 years, and 1.46 for ≥85 years compared with 65-69 years; all P<.05), female sex (OR, 1.09; P<.05), black race (OR 1.23; P<.05), larger tumor size (ORs of 1.23 for 11-20 mm and 1.28 for 21-30 mm tumors vs 1-10 mm tumors; all P<.05), and higher modified Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score (OR, 1.28 for score >1 vs score of 0; P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 1 in 4 patients with stage IA NSCLC received brain imaging at the time of diagnosis despite national recommendations against the practice. Although several patient factors are associated with receipt of brain imaging, there is significant geographic variation across the United States. Closer adherence to clinical guidelines is likely to result in more cost-effective care.

Sociodemographic disparities in the management of advanced lung cancer: a narrative review

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has markedly changed in the past decade with the integration of biomarker testing, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and palliative care. These advancements have led to significant improvements in quality of life and overall survival. Despite these improvements, racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer mortality persist. This narrative review aims to assess and synthesize the literature on sociodemographic disparities in the management of advanced NSCLC. A narrative overview of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Scopus and was narrowed to articles published from January 1, 2010, until July 22, 2020. Articles relevant to sociodemographic variation in (I) chemoradiation for stage III NSCLC, (II) molecular biomarker testing, (III) systemic treatment, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, and (IV) palliative and end of life care were included in this review. Twenty-two studies were included. Sociodemographic disparities in the management of advanced NSCLC varied, but recurring findings emerged. Across most treatment domains, Black patients, the uninsured, and patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive recommended lung cancer care. However, some of the literature was limited due to incomplete data to adequately assess appropriateness of care, and several studies were out of date with current practice guidelines. Sociodemographic disparities in the management of advanced lung cancer are evident. Given the rapidly evolving treatment paradigm for advanced NSCLC, updated research is needed. Research on interventions to address disparities in advanced NSCLC is also needed.

Excess mortality and undertreatment in elderly lung cancer patients: treatment nihilism in the modern era?

Treatment of elderly patients with lung cancer is significantly hindered by concerns about treatment tolerability, toxicity and limited clinical trial data in the elderly; potentially giving rise to treatment nihilism amongst clinicians. This study aims to describe survival in elderly patients with lung cancer and explore potential causes for excess mortality.

Patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry between 2011–2018 were analysed (n=3481). Patients were age-categorised and compared using Cox-regression modelling to determine mortality risk, after adjusting for confounding. Probability of being offered cancer treatments was also determined, further stratified by disease stage.

The eldest patients (≥80 years old) had significantly shorter median survival compared with younger age groups (<60 years: 2.0 years; 60–69 years: 1.5 years; 70–79 years: 1.6 years; ≥80 years: 1.0 years; p<0.001). Amongst those diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 lung cancer, there was no significant difference in adjusted-mortality between age groups. However, in those diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 disease, the eldest patients had an increased adjusted-mortality risk of 28% compared with patients younger than 60 years old (p=0.005), associated with markedly reduced probability of cancer treatment, after controlling for sex, performance status, comorbidities and histology type (OR 0.24, compared with <60 years old strata; p<0.001).

Compared to younger patients, older patients with advanced-stage lung cancer have a disproportionately higher risk of mortality and lower likelihood of receiving cancer treatments, even when performance status and comorbidity are equivalent. These healthcare inequities could be indicative of widespread treatment nihilism towards elderly patients.

Treatment strongly determines lung cancer survival, yet nihilism may threaten treatment provision and survival outcomes. Older patients in this cohort had reduced multidisciplinary presentation, less treatment (OR 0.24) and 28% increased mortality risk.https://bit.ly/2ZGotj0

The Role of Radiation Therapy in the Older Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Older patients represent a unique subgroup of the cancer patient population for which the role of radiation therapy (RT) requires special consideration. This review will discuss many of these considerations as well as various radiation treatment techniques in the context of a variety of disease sites.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies give insight into the management of older cancer patients considering their age, performance status, comorbid conditions, quality of life, genetics, cost, and individual goals. RT plays an evolving and pivotal role in providing optimal care for this population. Recent advances in RT technique allow for more precise treatment delivery and reduced toxicity. Studies evaluating the use of radiation therapy in breast, brain, lung, prostate, rectal, pancreatic, esophageal, and oligometastatic cancer are summarized and discussed in the context of treating the older patient population. Individual age, performance and functional status, comorbid conditions, and patients' objectives and goals should all be considered when presenting treatment options for older patients and age alone should not disqualify patients from curative intent treatments. When possible, hypofractionated courses should be utilized as outcomes are often equivalent and toxicities are reduced. In many cases, RT may be preferable to other treatment options due to decreased toxicity profile and acceptable disease control.

Metastasis Patterns and Prognosis of Octogenarians with NSCLC: A Population-based Study

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Age at diagnosis of advanced NSCLC is much older, but studies describing the practice patterns for octogenarians with distant metastasis NSCLC are limited. A retrospective, population-based study using national representative data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was conducted to evaluate 34 882 NSCLC patients with extrathoracic metastases from 2010 to 2013. Patients were classified into three groups (older group: ≥80 yrs, middle-aged group: 60-79 yrs, and younger group: ≤59 yrs). The role of different age at diagnosis of NSCLC in metastasis patterns was investigated, and survival of different age groups of metastatic NSCLC was assessed. The analysis revealed that older patients were more likely to only have bone or liver metastasis (p< 0.001), but less likely to have brain only metastasis (p<0.001) and multiple metastatic sites (p< 0.001) than other two groups. Age at diagnosis was an independent risk factor for different metastasis types. Older group had the worst overall survival (p<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (p<0.001). Furthermore, older age patients with only bone metastasis had the best cancer specific survival (p<0.05) while younger patients with only brain metastasis had the best prognosis (p<0.001). Over 60% octogenarians with metastatic NSCLC did not receive anti-cancer therapy and had the highest rate of cancer deaths among all patients. Our results may help clinicians make positive decisions regarding personalized treatment of metastatic NSCLC in the elderly.

Patterns of care and treatment outcomes in patients age 80 or older with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older adults are underrepresented in landmark trials that determine treatment guidelines for pancreatic cancer. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare treatment patterns and outcomes in stage I-III pancreatic cancer between older adult patients, defined as age 80 or older, to patients younger than 80.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified 140,678 patients in the NCDB diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from 2004 to 2015. Patients with metastatic disease or non-adenocarcinoma histologies were excluded. Descriptive statistics comparing patients age 80+ and age <80 were generated. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of cancer-directed therapy receipt (defined as receipt of chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery) in older patients, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to evaluate survival in the older cohort.

RESULTS

We identified 140,678 patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer, of which 23,395 patients (16.6%) were 80 or older. Among older patients, 44.5% of patients received cancer-directed therapy compared to 78.7% among other patients (p < .001). Older patients had worse 2-year survival at 11.3% versus 27.5% for younger (p < .001). 2-year survivorship decreased further in older patients who received no cancer-directed treatment, at 4.7% compared with 19.5% for older patients receiving treatment (p < .001). After propensity score matching, cancer-directed treatment remained associated with improved survival for older patients (hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.43; p < .001).

DISCUSSION

Rates of cancer-directed therapy were low in patients age 80+, with 55.5% receiving no therapy. Cancer-directed treatment was associated with an overall survival benefit. Future trials are needed to define optimal treatment paradigms in this population.

The Oldest Old: A National Analysis of Outcomes for Patients 90 Years or Older With Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Most clinicians will encounter patients 90 years or older with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but evidence that informs treatment decisions for this extremely elderly population is lacking. This study evaluated outcomes associated with treatment strategies for this nonagenarian population.

METHODS

Treatment and overall survival for patients 90 years and older with NSCLC in the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2014) were evaluated using logistic regression, the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The majority (n = 4152, 57.6%) of the 7205 patients 90 years or older with stage I-IV NSCLC did not receive any therapy. For the entire cohort, receiving treatment was associated with significantly better survival when compared with no therapy (5-year survival, 9.3% [95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0%-10.7%] vs 1.7% [95% CI, 1.2%-2.2%]; multivariable adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53; P < .001). Stage I patients had the most pronounced survival benefit with treatment (median survival, 27.4 months vs 10.0 months with no treatment; P < .001). Among this subset of patients with stage I disease (n = 1430), only 12.7% (n = 182) had surgery and 33% (n = 471) had no therapy. In these stage I patients surgery was associated with significantly better 5-year survival (33.7% [95% CI, 25.4%-42.1%]) than nonoperative therapy (17.1% [95% CI, 13.7%-20.8%]) and no therapy (6.2% [95% CI, 3.8%-9.4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy for nonagenarians with NSCLC is associated with a significant survival benefit but is not used in most patients. Treatment should not be withheld for these "oldest old" patients based on their age alone but should be considered based on stage and patient preferences in a multidisciplinary setting.

Strengths and limitations of large databases in lung cancer radiation oncology research

There has been a substantial rise in the utilization of large databases in radiation oncology research. The advantages of these datasets include a large sample size and inclusion of a diverse population of patients in a real-world setting. Such observational studies hold promise in enhancing our understanding of questions for which evidence is conflicting or absent in lung cancer radiotherapy. However, it is critical that investigators understand the strengths and limitations of large databases in order to avoid the common pitfalls that beset observational analyses. This review begins by outlining the data variables available in major registries that are used most often in observational analyses. This is followed by a discussion of the type of radiotherapy-related questions that can be addressed using such datasets, accompanied by examples from the lung cancer literature. Finally, we describe some limitations of observational research and techniques to mitigate bias and confounding. We hope that clinicians and researchers find this review helpful for designing new research studies and interpreting published analyses in the literature.

"Age matters"-German claims data indicate disparities in lung cancer care between elderly and young patients

Background

Although lung cancer is most commonly diagnosed in elderly patients, evidence about tumor-directed therapy in elderly patients is sparse, and it is unclear to what extent this affects treatment and care. Our study aimed to discover potential disparities in care between elderly patients and those under 65 years of age.

Methods

We studied claims from 13 283 German patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 2009 who survived for at least 90 days after diagnosis. We classified patients as “non-elderly” (≤ 65), “young-old” (65–74), “middle-old” (75–84), and “old-old” (≥ 85). We compared receipt of tumor-directed therapy (6 months after diagnosis), palliative care, opioids, antidepressants, and pathologic diagnosis confirmation via logistic regression. We used generalized linear regression (gamma distribution) to compare group-specific costs of care for 3 months after diagnosis. We adjusted all models by age, nursing home residency, nursing care need, comorbidity burden, and area of residence (urban, rural). The age group “non-elderly” served as reference group.

Results

Compared with the reference group “non-elderly”, the likelihood of receiving any tumor-directed treatment was significantly lower in all age groups with a decreasing gradient with advancing age. Elderly lung cancer patients received significantly fewer resections and radiotherapy than non-elderly patients. In particular, treatment with antineoplastic therapy declined with increasing age (“young-old” (OR = 0.76, CI = [0.70,0.83]), “middle-old” (OR = 0.45, CI = [0.36,0.50]), and “old-old” (OR = 0.13, CI = [0.10,0.17])). Patients in all age groups were less likely to receive structured palliative care than “non-elderly” (“young-old” (OR = 0.84, CI = [0.76,0.92]), “middle-old” (OR = 0.71, CI = [0.63,0.79]), and “old-old” (OR = 0.57, CI = [0.44,0.73])). Moreover, increased age was significantly associated with reduced quotas for outpatient treatment with opioids and antidepressants. Costs of care decreased significantly with increasing age.

Conclusion

This study suggests the existence of age-dependent care disparities in lung cancer patients, where elderly patients are at risk of potential undertreatment. To support equal access to care, adjustments to public health policies seem to be urgently required.

Disparities in Postoperative Therapy for Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

The patterns of care for salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) are unknown. We sought to assess predictors of receiving postoperative radiation and/or chemotherapy for patients with nonmetastatic, definitively resected ACC, as well as report unexpected nodal disease.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for definitively resected nonmetastatic ACC from 2004 to 2014. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional-hazard models were utilized. Propensity-score matched analysis was employed to reduce confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3,136 patients met entry criteria: 2,252 (71.8%) received postoperative radiation, with 223 (7.4%) also receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 4.87 years. In clinically lymph node negative (cN0) patients, 7.4% had pathologically positive lymph nodes (pN) + after elective neck dissection. Patients who lived closer to their treatment facility and had positive margins were more likely to receive postoperative radiation. Black patients and uninsured patients were less likely to receive radiation. Older age, male sex, advancing stage, and positive surgical margins were associated with worse overall survival (OS). With limited follow-up, receipt of radiation or chemotherapy was not associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiation was frequently given for resected ACC, with a minority receiving chemotherapy. Black patients and uninsured patients were less likely to receive radiation. Postoperative radiation and/or chemotherapy had no association with OS but were given in greater frequency in more advanced disease, and our series is limited by short follow-up. The disparity findings for this rare disease need to be addressed in future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c Laryngoscope, 129:377-386, 2019.