1
|
Bhatia VP, Ebert K, Cannon S, Farhat WA, Brown HW, Mahoney J, Hilliard ME, Penniston KL. Call the experts: identifying stakeholders in the long-term care of youth with hypospadias. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1445205. [PMID: 39539770 PMCID: PMC11557310 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1445205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Long-term follow-up for individuals with hypospadias remains a critical area of need, yet evidence-based guidelines for such follow-up are lacking, and the role of involvement of relevant experts is not yet established. Using our hypospadias-specific health-related quality of life conceptual framework and a subsequent qualitative study of prepubertal males and parents of males with hypospadias, we identified potential priorities for long-term follow-up of youth with hypospadias. Using thematic codes from our patient and parent interviews, we searched PubMed for relevant articles and identified the specialties represented by all the authors of these articles. Our search strategy revealed consistent expertise across HRQOL themes and subthemes, including pediatric and adult urology, health psychology, psychiatry, endocrinology, genetics, and social work. Communication experts, as well as patients and families, were also represented in our literature search. Using these findings, we compiled a comprehensive list of potential stakeholders to inform the development of holistic care guidelines for individuals with hypospadias. By engaging these stakeholders, we aim to develop consensus-based, long-term follow-up guidelines and tools to address the evolving physical and psychosocial needs of people with hypospadias over a lifetime. The use of qualitatively derived thematic codes to search for relevant literature is an accessible approach to identifying relevant stakeholders. These findings underscore the importance of involving diverse, multidisciplinary expertise to ensure comprehensive, patient-centered care in complex genitourinary conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinaya P. Bhatia
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison-UW Kids, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Kristin Ebert
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison-UW Kids, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Shannon Cannon
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison-UW Kids, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Walid A. Farhat
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison-UW Kids, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Heidi W. Brown
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Jane Mahoney
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Marisa E. Hilliard
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Texas Children’s Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kristina L. Penniston
- Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison-UW Kids, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Sutherland R, Sohoni N, Golos A, Ajjawi I, Leapman M. Sociodemographic disparities in prostate cancer imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04603-2. [PMID: 39325212 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04603-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
Imaging is central to the diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and monitoring of prostate cancer (PCa). Unequal access to new imaging techniques may directly contribute to gaps in PCa treatment and outcome. Thus, identifying disparities in PCa diagnosis and treatment are centrla to informing strategies to promote equitable cancer care. This review examines the existing evidence regarding clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with disparities in imaging utilization and treatment for PCa. Major areas of disparities identified include healthcare and research access. Sociodemographic disparities are present in screening and diagnosis; Black patients are consistently less likely to receive both prostate multiparametric MRI and timely molecular imaging used to evaluate for biochemical recurrence. Regional variation in appropriate and inappropriate diagnostic imaging also contributes to corresponding differences in outcomes, especially between urban and rural settings. Delays in PCa imaging and diagnosis also delay definitive treatment or placement on active surveillance, with prominent differences by race and measures of social advantage Recognition of these disparities in PCa imaging and treatment can reinforce actions to improve equitable access to patients affected by PCa. Identifying modifiable steps in the PCa diagnosis, staging, and treatment workflow may inform interventions to bridge gaps in cancer outcome.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng E, Saucke M, Pati B, Rose A, Levenson T, Alagoz E, Richards KA. "…I Wish Someone Told Me About That…": A Qualitative Assessment of the Educational Needs of Patients Undergoing Cystectomy. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00790-8. [PMID: 39271025 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To utilize patient feedback to identify areas of need for information and ways to improve delivery of education, due to recognition that cystectomy and urinary diversion is a complex operation often overwhelming patients and caregivers. METHODS We conducted 5 focus groups of bladder cancer patients (separated by gender and diversion type) treated with cystectomy and urinary diversion (n = 17). Questions focused on areas of improvement for patient education. Transcripts were analyzed using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift method, with insights directing the creation of a flexible codebook. A team of researchers created thematic summaries from individual codes and performed higher level analyses to characterize salient findings. RESULTS Patients described ways to improve the content, timing, and format of education. Most patients expressed a desire to receive a list of common patient experiences pre-operatively. Information they wish they had known beforehand included nuances of new urinary routines, sexual dysfunction, complications such as abdominal adhesions or hernias, and details regarding discharge criteria. Patients had differing opinions on what amount of information should be offered before surgery, but most agreed that options for more details available later were ideal. Preferences on formatting of information varied. Overall, an assortment of formats could allow patients to tailor their process to different learning preferences and individual situations. CONCLUSION Patients highlighted key areas for improvement in the breadth, timing, and format of perioperative education. Continued involvement of patients while developing these educational interventions will be pivotal for meeting patient needs and improving outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Zeng
- Department of Urology, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Megan Saucke
- Department of Surgery, The Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Madison, WI
| | - Bhabna Pati
- Department of Surgery, The Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Madison, WI
| | - Alexa Rose
- Department of Urology, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Taviah Levenson
- Department of Urology, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Esra Alagoz
- Department of Surgery, The Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Madison, WI
| | - Kyle A Richards
- Department of Urology, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McNall S, Hooper K, Sullivan T, Rieger-Christ K, Clements M. Treatment Modalities for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1843. [PMID: 38791924 PMCID: PMC11120410 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The landscape of treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is rapidly changing. A complete and careful transurethral resection is the mainstay of initial treatment and is followed by intravesical therapy in intermediate or high-risk cases. The standard of care is intravesical BCG. Many alternative or additive approaches to this are being explored. We divided this review into three relevant spaces to consider these novel treatment approaches: (1) low-risk disease, for which intravesical therapy is not usually considered, (2) BCG-naïve disease (i.e., considering alternatives to the standard therapy), and (3) BCG-unresponsive disease. We performed a review of published literature and summarized ongoing trials in the United States. Novel approaches that we explored include surgical techniques for resection, alterations in dwell time for intravesical therapy, delivery method and schedule of intravesical therapies, new intravesical therapy agents, and systemic therapies (especially immunotherapy). These are thoroughly outlined throughout this review article, and the numerous modalities being studied demonstrate significant promise for the future treatment of the expanding space of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon McNall
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA; (K.R.-C.); (M.C.)
| | - Kailey Hooper
- Department of Translational Research, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA; (K.H.); (T.S.)
| | - Travis Sullivan
- Department of Translational Research, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA; (K.H.); (T.S.)
| | - Kimberly Rieger-Christ
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA; (K.R.-C.); (M.C.)
- Department of Translational Research, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA; (K.H.); (T.S.)
| | - Matthew Clements
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA; (K.R.-C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Myers A, Ristau B, Mossanen M, Tyson MD, Chisolm S, Sloan F, Ball CT, Smith A, Lyon TD. Patient reported treatment burden and attitudes towards in-home intravesical therapy among patients with bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:29.e17-29.e22. [PMID: 37993341 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify patient reported treatment burden while receiving intravesical therapy for bladder cancer and to survey patient perspectives on in-home intravesical therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network. Survey questions were developed by investigators, then iteratively revised by clinician and patient advocates. Eligible participants had to have received at least 1 dose of intravesical therapy delivered in an ambulatory setting. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-three patients responded to the survey with median age of 70 years (range 33-88 years). Two-thirds of respondents (66%, 151/232) had received greater than 12 bladder instillations. A travel time of >30 minutes to an intravesical treatment facility was reported by 55% (126/231) of respondents. Fifty-six percent (128/232) brought caregivers to their appointments, and 36% (82/230) missed work to receive treatment. Sixty-one respondents (26%) felt the process of receiving bladder instillations adversely affected their ability to perform regular daily activities. Among those surveyed, 72% (168/232) reported openness to receiving in-home intravesical instillations and 54% (122/228) answered that in-home instillations would make the treatment process less disruptive to their lives. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cancer patients reported considerable travel distances, time requirements, and need for caregiver support when receiving intravesical therapy. Nearly three-quarters of survey respondents reported openness to receiving intravesical instillations in their home, with many identifying potential benefits for home over clinic-based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Myers
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mark D Tyson
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | - Frank Sloan
- Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Colleen T Ball
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Angela Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gore JL, Wolff EM, Comstock BA, Follmer KM, Nash MG, Basu A, Chisolm S, MacLean DB, Lee JR, Lotan Y, Porten SP, Steinberg GD, Chang SS, Gilbert SM, Kessler LG, Smith AB. Protocol of the Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options (CISTO) study: a pragmatic, prospective multicenter observational cohort study of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1127. [PMID: 37980511 PMCID: PMC10657633 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11605-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer poses a significant public health burden, with high recurrence and progression rates in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Current treatment options include bladder-sparing therapies (BST) and radical cystectomy, both with associated risks and benefits. However, evidence supporting optimal management decisions for patients with recurrent high-grade NMIBC remains limited, leading to uncertainty for patients and clinicians. The CISTO (Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options) Study aims to address this critical knowledge gap by comparing outcomes between patients undergoing BST and radical cystectomy. METHODS The CISTO Study is a pragmatic, prospective observational cohort trial across 36 academic and community urology practices in the US. The study will enroll 572 patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who select management with either BST or radical cystectomy. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life (QOL) at 12 months as measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Secondary outcomes include bladder cancer-specific QOL, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and financial toxicity. The study will also assess patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Statistical analyses will employ targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) to address treatment selection bias and confounding by indication. DISCUSSION The CISTO Study is powered to detect clinically important differences in QOL and cancer-specific survival between the two treatment approaches. By including a diverse patient population, the study also aims to assess outcomes across the following patient characteristics: age, gender, race, burden of comorbid health conditions, cancer severity, caregiver status, social determinants of health, and rurality. Treatment outcomes may also vary by patient preferences, health literacy, and baseline QOL. The CISTO Study will fill a crucial evidence gap in the management of recurrent high-grade NMIBC, providing evidence-based guidance for patients and clinicians in choosing between BST and radical cystectomy. The CISTO study will provide an evidence-based approach to identifying the right treatment for the right patient at the right time in the challenging clinical setting of recurrent high-grade NMIBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03933826. Registered on May 1, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bryan A Comstock
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Michael G Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Departments of Pharmacy, Health Services, and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Jenney R Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Larry G Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nyame YA, Gore JL, Lin DW. Putting patients first to redefine prostate cancer classifications. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1249-1251. [PMID: 37463855 PMCID: PMC10637029 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mossanen M, Smith AB, Onochie N, Matulewicz R, Bjurlin MA, Kibel AS, Abbas M, Shore N, Chisolm S, Bangs R, Cooper Z, Gore JL. Bladder cancer patient and provider perspectives on smoking cessation. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:457.e9-457.e16. [PMID: 37805339 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking is the most common risk factor for bladder cancer and is associated with adverse clinical and cancer-related outcomes. Increasing understanding of the patient and provider perspectives on smoking cessation may provide insight into improving smoking cessation rates among bladder cancer survivors. We sought to inform strategies for providers promoting cessation efforts and help patients quit smoking. METHODS Using a modified Delphi process with multidisciplinary input from bladder cancer providers, researchers, and a patient advocate, 2 surveys were created for bladder cancer patients and providers. Surveys included multiple-choice questions and free answers. The survey was administered electronically and queried participants' perspectives on barriers and facilitators associated with smoking cessation. Survey responses were anonymous, and participants were provided with a $20 Amazon gift card for participating. Patients were approached through the previously established Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Patient Survey Network, an online bladder cancer patient and caregiver community. Providers were recruited from the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) and the Large Urology Group Practice Association (LUGPA). RESULTS From May to June 2021, 308 patients and 103 providers completed their respective surveys. Among patients who quit smoking, most (64%) preferred no pharmacologic intervention ("cold turkey") followed by nicotine replacement therapy (28%). Repeated efforts at cessation commonly occurred, and 67% reported making more than one attempt at quitting prior to eventual smoking cessation. Approximately 1 in 10 patients were unaware of the association between bladder cancer and smoking. Among providers, 75% felt that barriers to provide cessation include a lack of clinical time, adequate training, and reimbursement concerns. However, 79% of providers endorsed a willingness to receive continuing education on smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cancer patients utilize a variety of cessation strategies with "cold turkey" being the most used method, and many patients make multiple attempts at smoking cessation. Providers confront multiple barriers to conducting smoking cessation, including inadequate time and training in cessation methods; however, most would be willing to receive additional education. These results inform future interventions tailored to bladder cancer clinicians to better support provider efforts to provide smoking cessation counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA; Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA.
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Richard Matulewicz
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Department of Urology, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Muhammad Abbas
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Neal Shore
- GenesisCare, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
| | | | - Rick Bangs
- GenesisCare, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD
| | - Zara Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Colomer‐Lahiguera S, Steimer M, Ellis U, Eicher M, Tompson M, Corbière T, Haase KR. Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15530-15543. [PMID: 37329180 PMCID: PMC10417078 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research emphasizes the importance of doing research with, rather than for people with lived health/illness experience(s). The purpose of this scoping review is to investigate the breadth and depth of scientific literature on PPI in cancer research and to identify how is PPI applied and reported in cancer research. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo up to March 2022. All titles/abstracts and full-text results were screened by two reviewers. Data were analyzed and are presented in both narrative and tabular format. RESULTS We screened 22,009 titles/abstract, reviewed 375 full-text articles, of which 101 studies were included in this review. 66 papers applied PPI; 35 used co-design methodologies. PPI in cancer research in published research has increased steadily since 2015 and often includes those with a past diagnosis of cancer or relatives/informal caregivers. The most common applied methods were workshops or interviews. PPI was generally used at the level of consultation/advisor and occurred mainly in early stages of research. Costs related to PPI were mentioned in 25 papers and four papers described training provided for PPI. CONCLUSIONS Results of our review demonstrate the nature and extent of PPI expansion in cancer research. Researchers and research organizations entering the fray of PPI should consider planning and reporting elements such as the stage, level, and role type of PPI, as well as methods and strategies put in place to assure diversity. Furthermore, a thorough evaluation of whether all these elements meet the stated PPI purpose will help to grasp its impact on research outcomes. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Two patients participated in the stakeholder consultation as part of the scoping review methodology, contributed to the discussion on refining the results, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Both are co-authors of this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Colomer‐Lahiguera
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
| | - Matthieu Steimer
- Master of Advanced Studies in Public Health studentInstitute of Global Health, Geneva UniversityGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Ursula Ellis
- Woodward LibraryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
| | | | - Tourane Corbière
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Filippou P, Hugar LA, Louwers R, Pomper A, Chisolm S, Smith AB, Gore JL, Gilbert SM. Palliative care knowledge, attitudes, and experiences amongst patients with bladder cancer and their caregivers. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:108.e1-108.e9. [PMID: 36529652 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Palliative care is underutilized amongst patients with bladder cancer despite guideline recommendations and known benefits. In order to uncover potential access barriers, we sought to describe patient and caregiver knowledge, attitudes and experiences surrounding palliative care. METHODS We surveyed 272 patients with bladder cancer and their caregivers through the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network. In addition to collecting demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics, previously studied and validated questionnaires on palliative care knowledge and beliefs were administered. Patients and caregivers were also queried regarding their experiences with palliative care consultation. RESULTS Survey respondents demonstrated highly accurate knowledge of palliative care services. Attitudes and beliefs surrounding palliative care were overall positive. Caregivers demonstrated better knowledge and more positive beliefs of palliative care compared to patients. Despite an overall positive sentiment toward palliative care, only 9% of the cohort had palliative care consultation as part of their cancer treatment plan. Most patients with muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer wished that palliative care had been discussed by their providers. CONCLUSIONS A subset of bladder cancer patients possess accurate knowledge and positive beliefs of palliative care. Palliative care is infrequently discussed during the treatment of bladder cancer, with patients and their caregivers expressing desire for palliative care to be discussed more often. Provider education surrounding palliative care services is imperative to improving access for bladder cancer patients and caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lee A Hugar
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa FL
| | - Renata Louwers
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ann Pomper
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa FL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nyame YA, Cooperberg MR, Cumberbatch MG, Eggener SE, Etzioni R, Gomez SL, Haiman C, Huang F, Lee CT, Litwin MS, Lyratzopoulos G, Mohler JL, Murphy AB, Pettaway C, Powell IJ, Sasieni P, Schaeffer EM, Shariat SF, Gore JL. Deconstructing, Addressing, and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Prostate Cancer Care. Eur Urol 2022; 82:341-351. [PMID: 35367082 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Men of African ancestry have demonstrated markedly higher rates of prostate cancer mortality than men of other races and ethnicities around the world. In fact, the highest rates of prostate cancer mortality worldwide are found in the Caribbean and Sub-Saharan West Africa, and among men of African descent in the USA. Addressing this inequity in prostate cancer care and outcomes requires a focused research approach that creates durable solutions to address the structural, social, environmental, and health factors that create racial disparities in care and outcomes. OBJECTIVE To introduce a conceptual model for evaluating racial inequities in prostate cancer care to facilitate the development of translational research studies and interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A collaborative review of literature relevant to racial inequities in prostate cancer care and outcomes was performed. Existing literature was used to highlight various components of the conceptual model to inform future research and interventions toward equitable care and outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Racial inequities in prostate cancer outcomes are driven by a series of structural and social determinants of health that impact exposures, mediators, and outcomes. Social determinants of equity, such as laws/policies, economic systems, and structural racism, affect the inequitable access to environmental and neighborhood exposures, in addition to health care access. Although the incidence disparity remains problematic, various studies have demonstrated parity in outcomes when social and health factors, such as access to equitable care, are normalized. Few studies have tested interventions to reduce inequities in prostate cancer among Black men. CONCLUSIONS Worldwide, men of African ancestry demonstrate worse outcomes in prostate cancer, a phenomenon driven largely by social factors that inform biologic, environmental, and health care risks. A conceptual model was presented that organizes the many factors that influence prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Within that framework, we must understand the current state of inequities in clinical prostate cancer practice, the optimal state of what equitable practice would be, and how achieving equity in prostate cancer care balances costs, benefits, and harms. More robust characterization of the sources of prostate cancer inequities should inform testing of ambitious and innovative interventions as we work toward equity in care and outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Men of African ancestry demonstrate the highest rates of prostate cancer mortality, which may be reduced through social interventions. We present a framework for formalizing the identification of the drivers of prostate cancer inequities to facilitate the development of interventions and trials to eradicate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Scott E Eggener
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ruth Etzioni
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Genetic Epidemiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Franklin Huang
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark S Litwin
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - James L Mohler
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Curtis Pettaway
- Department of Urology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isaac J Powell
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Peter Sasieni
- Cancer Research UK & King's College London Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shapiro M, Renly S, Maiorano A, Young J, Medina E, Neinstein A, Odisho AY. Digital Health at Enterprise Scale: An Evaluation Framework for Selecting Patient Facing Software in a Digital First Health System (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2022; 7:e43009. [PMID: 37027184 PMCID: PMC10131984 DOI: 10.2196/43009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The digital transformation of our health care system will require not only digitization of existing tools but also a redesign of our care delivery system and collaboration with digital partners. Traditional patient journeys are reactive to symptom presentation and delayed by health care system-centric scheduling, leading to poor experience and avoidable adverse outcomes. Patient journeys will be reimagined to a digital health pathway that seamlessly integrates various care experiences from telemedicine, remote monitoring, to in-person clinic visits. Through centering the care delivery around the patients, they can have more delightful experiences and enjoy the quality of standardized condition pathways and outcomes. To design and implement digital health pathways at scale, enterprise health care systems need to develop capabilities and partnerships in human-centered design, operational workflow, clinical content management, communication channels and mechanisms, reporting and analytics, standards-based integration, security and data management, and scalability. Using a human-centered design methodology, care pathways will be built upon an understanding of the unmet needs of the patients to have a more enjoyable experience of care with improved clinical outcomes. To power this digital care pathway, enterprises will choose to build or partner for clinical content management to operationalize up-to-date, best-in-class pathways. With this clinical engine, this digital solution will engage with patients through multimodal communication modalities, including written, audio, photo, or video, throughout the patient journey. Leadership teams will review reporting and analytics functions to track that the digital care pathways will be iterated to improve patient experience, clinical metrics, and operational efficiency. On the backend, standards-based integration will allow this system to be built in conjunction with the electronic medical record and other data systems to provide safe and efficient use of the digital care solution. For protecting patient information and compliance, a security and data management strategy is critical to derisking breeches and preserving privacy. Finally, a framework of technical scalability will allow digital care pathways to proliferate throughout the enterprise and support the entire patient population. This framework empowers enterprise health care systems to avoid collecting a fragmented series of one-off solutions but develop a sustainable concerted roadmap to the future of proactive intelligent patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Shapiro
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sondra Renly
- Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ali Maiorano
- Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jerry Young
- Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Eli Medina
- Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Aaron Neinstein
- Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Anobel Y Odisho
- Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Postprocedural Pain Associated With 5 Versus 20 Intradetrusor Injections of onabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2022; 28:518-525. [PMID: 35543540 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA is performed via varying injection paradigms but no studies have studied the various effects of these paradigms on patient experience with the procedure. OBJECTIVES This randomized clinical trial aims to compare pain and procedure time between patients receiving a 100-unit dose of onabotulinumtoxinA in 5 injections compared to 20 injections for the treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder or urgency urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN Patients presenting with refractory overactive bladder or urgency urinary incontinence at 2 clinical sites were identified and randomized to undergo onabotulinumtoxinA treatment with 5 injections versus 20 injections. Patients rated their pain level on a 10-point visual analog scale at procedure completion. The procedure duration was recorded with a stopwatch. Patients were followed up 6 weeks postprocedure, at which time they completed a Global Response Assessment to determine subjective efficacy of treatment. Participants were additionally monitored for incidence of adverse events in the follow-up period. RESULTS The average pain score was not statistically significant between groups (2; interquartile range, 1-4 for the 5 injection group vs 3; interquartile range, 2-4 for the 20 injection group; P = 0.27). Patients who received 5 injections experienced significantly shorter mean procedure time as compared with patients who received 20 injections (76 seconds vs 176 seconds; P < 0.001). There were no differences in subjective efficacy or adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS Perceived pain, efficacy, and postprocedure complications did not significantly differ between patients receiving 5 injections and 20 injections, but procedure time was significantly shorter.
Collapse
|
14
|
Smith AB, McCabe S, Deal AM, Guo A, Gessner KH, Lipman R, Chisolm S, Ahlschlager L, Gore JL. Quality of Life and Health State Utilities in Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2022; 8:55-70. [PMID: 38994519 PMCID: PMC11181821 DOI: 10.3233/blc-211615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer treatments may variably impact health-related quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE To characterize the quality of life of patients with bladder cancer at various time points across the continuum of bladder cancer care from non-muscle-invasive disease to metastatic bladder cancer and develop utility scores to inform cost-effective analyses. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional survey of bladder cancer patients in the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network. Participants were classified into mutually exclusive health states based upon non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), muscle-invasive (MIBC), or metastatic bladder cancer and completed surveys of generic cancer and bladder cancer-specific quality of life, financial toxicity, and work impairment. We constructed generalized linear mixed models to identify patient, clinical, and treatment factors associated with quality of life over time and derived health state utilities. RESULTS Among 911 self-identified patients with bladder cancer, overall QOL scores and function domains were worse among those with advanced cancer. Financial toxicity was similar among non-metastatic disease states. Work and activity impairment increased with advancing disease (13%and 12%among non-recurrent NMIBC to 63%and 31%for metastatic disease respectively; p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, bowel-related QOL was diminished among patients with MIBC, with urinary symptoms and physical function most diminished among patients with metastatic disease. Patients with metastatic and MIBC experienced worse emotional functioning (p = 0.04; p = 0.048). Health state utilities were calculated, highest among those with non-recurrent NMIBC and lowest among those with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION Generic and bladder cancer-specific QOL diminishes with advancing disease. Health state utility estimates derived from this study can inform shared decision making with patients and may be used to inform future cost-effective analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela B. Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sean McCabe
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison M. Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Kathryn H. Gessner
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert Lipman
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Research Patient Advocate, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Chisolm
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Director of Education & Research, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lauren Ahlschlager
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Samson S, Northey JJ, Acerbi I, Goga A, Flink CL, Weaver VM, LaBarge MA. NCI's publication affiliation conundrum: Reframing innovation to incentivize an equitable path for advocate representation. Transl Oncol 2022; 16:101325. [PMID: 34974281 PMCID: PMC8728534 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Advocacy engagement has been at the forefront of National Cancer Institute (NCI) efforts to advance scientific discoveries and transform medical interventions. Nonetheless, the journey for advocates has been uneven. Case in Point: NCI publication affiliation rules of engagement pose unique equity challenges while raising questions about structural representation in biomedical research. Abiding by the core rationale that publication affiliation should be tailored to employment status, the NCI has systematically denied research advocate volunteers the opportunity to specifically list NCI as an institutional affiliation on academic publications. Unpacking advocate NCI publication affiliation restrictions and its links with advocacy heritage preservation and convergent science goals poses unique diversity, equity, and inclusion challenges and opportunities. Improving the quality of structural representation in biomedical research requires new theories of action and flexible planning to advance, promote and build capacity for strategic advocacy inclusion and equity within publication affiliation initiatives. Here we highlight several opportunities for how leadership might formulate a radically different vision for NCI's approach. This perspective interrogates the best way forward for ensuring that biomedical employee and volunteer advocate workforce publication affiliation intersections are characterized by increased creativity and representation parity. Imbuing the scientist and clinical researcher archetype with social dimensions, we join NCI critical thinkers in urging employees, funded academics, and volunteer citizen scientists to collectively assume the role as paladins of science and integrity who view the triumphs of making a difference in science alongside the social responsibility of promoting transdisciplinary professionalism and the democratization of science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Samson
- Breast Oncology Program, Breast Science Advocacy Core (BSAC), University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94115; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, United States; Physical Sciences and Oncology Network Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, United States.
| | - Jason J Northey
- Department of Surgery and Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Irene Acerbi
- Department of Surgery and Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Andrei Goga
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, United States; Department of Cell and Tissue Biology and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Carl L Flink
- College of Liberal Arts, Theatre Arts and Dance, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
| | - Valerie M Weaver
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, United States; Department of Surgery and Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Mark A LaBarge
- Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith AB, Lee JR, Lawrence SO, Ho O, Lavallee DC, Chisolm S, MacLean DB, Louwers RK, Wolff EM, Kessler LG, Follmer KM, Gore JL. Patient and public involvement in the design and conduct of a large, pragmatic observational trial to investigate recurrent, high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer 2022; 128:103-111. [PMID: 34495550 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered approaches to research design are particularly important for diseases with complex treatment decision-making, such as recurrent, high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The objective of this article is to describe patient and public involvement (PPI) in designing a large, pragmatic observational trial and to articulate barriers, challenges, and lessons learned for future design. METHODS Through multistakeholder involvement, a large, pragmatic observational trial was designed to investigate the outcomes of high-risk, recurrent NMIBC, and it was titled Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer (CISTO). CISTO's design used the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 reporting checklist for PPI and built on prior engagement infrastructure in partnership with the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network. RESULTS CISTO's PPI began with research prioritization to identify the highest priority questions facing patients with NMIBC. A pragmatic observational study design was selected and refined through stakeholder input. PPI included patients and caregivers organized into an advocate advisory board and clinicians, researchers, payers, and industry representatives organized into an external advisory board. An engagement plan was created to define the stages of PPI and the level and nature of the involvement of each group. PPI was measured quantitatively and qualitatively through evaluation surveys and iterative feedback from board members, with changes made for continuous improvement. CONCLUSIONS Through intentional PPI, CISTO aims to produce pragmatic and generalizable results that will allow patients to make informed decisions for recurrent, high-risk NMIBC based on their personal experiences. LAY SUMMARY Involving patients and other stakeholders in research ensures that it reflects the outcomes that matter most to them. This is especially important when research focuses on conditions in which patients face difficult decisions about treatment options. This article describes the key role that stakeholders played in shaping the Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer (CISTO) study. It compares treatments for recurrent noninvasive bladder cancer and describes how stakeholders were engaged to design and develop the study and the practices that supported their involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jenney R Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah O Lawrence
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - On Ho
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Danielle C Lavallee
- British Columbia Academic Health Science Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Doug B MacLean
- Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer Advocate Advisory Board, Seattle, Washington
| | - Renata K Louwers
- Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer Advocate Advisory Board, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Larry G Kessler
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kristin M Follmer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lotan Y, Gakis G, Manfredi M, Morote J, Mostafid H, Porpiglia F, Poyet C, Roupret M, Schulman C, Shariat SF, Witjes JA. Alternating Cystoscopy with Bladder EpiCheck ® in the Surveillance of Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk NMIBC: A Cost Comparison Model. Bladder Cancer 2021; 7:307-315. [PMID: 38993615 PMCID: PMC11181831 DOI: 10.3233/blc-211528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer surveillance is invasive, intensive and costly. Patients with low grade intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are at high risk of recurrence. OBJECTIVE The objective of this model is to compare the cost of a strategy to alternate surveillance with cystoscopy and a urine marker, Bladder EpiCheck, to standard surveillance. METHODS A decision tree model was built using TreeAge Pro Healthcare to compare standard surveillance (Standard) with a modified surveillance incorporating Bladder EpiCheck. The model was based on 2 years of surveillance. Outcomes were obtained from literature. Costs were obtained from US and 9 European countries. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS The efficacy of the model was equivalent in terms of recurrence for each arm with median recurrence rate of 22%. When setting marker price at 200 local currency, the marker arm was less expensive in the USA, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Italy, Austria and UK by 154€ to 329£ per patient, for a 2-year period. Cost was higher in France, Spain, and Germany by 33-103€. Cost parity was achieved with marker price between 148€ and $421. Marker cost and specificity have the greatest impact on the overall model cost. CONCLUSIONS A strategy alternating the urine marker Bladder EpiCheck with cystoscopy in the surveillance of patients with low grade intermediate risk bladder cancer is cost equivalent in the US and European countries when the marker is priced 148€ -$421, as a result of the marker's high specificity (86%). Prospective studies will be necessary to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Department of Urology - University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology - University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Cedric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Sorbonne University, GRC n°5, PREDICTIVE ONCO-URO, AP-HP, Urology, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Claude Schulman
- Clinic E. Cavell and University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kukreja JB, Schroeck FR, Lotan Y, Gore JL, Ullman R, Lipman RR, Murray MBB, Chisolm S, Smith AB. Discomfort and relieving factors among patients with bladder cancer undergoing office-based cystoscopy. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:9.e19-9.e27. [PMID: 34162499 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the degree of discomfort among patients with bladder cancer undergoing office-based cystoscopy and identify factors and interventions that influence discomfort and anxiety. METHODS We conducted a survey of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network (BCAN PSN) to investigate the degree of discomfort associated with office-based cystoscopy and prevalence of interventions used to reduce discomfort. All patients had undergone at least one previous cystoscopy. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with moderate-to-severe cystoscopy discomfort. RESULTS Among 488 BCAN PSN respondents (50% response rate), 392 responded with demographic data and discomfort score. Cystoscopy was associated with moderate-to-severe discomfort in 52% of patients. Respondents who reported moderate-to-severe discomfort were more likely to describe their most recent cystoscopy discomfort as worse than prior (P<0.001) and to be interested in planning discomfort mitigation for cystoscopy (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, gender was the only factor independently associated with discomfort, with women reporting less discomfort than men (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.37-0.95,P=0.03). Patients reported a wide variety of cystoscopy-specific interventions with differing perceived effectiveness, the most common being intraurethral lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS Over half of patients undergoing office-based cystoscopy for bladder cancer report moderate-to-severe discomfort, constituting a substantial problem among patients undergoing the procedure. Future large pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials are needed to better understand which interventions work most effectively to reduce discomfort associated with cystoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Florian R Schroeck
- Section of Urology and VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, Vermont; Section of Urology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Ralph Ullman
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Research Patient Advocate
| | | | | | | | -
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Research Patient Advocate
| | - Angela B Smith
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Michaud S, Needham J, Sundquist S, Johnson D, Hanna S, Hosseinzadeh S, Bartekian V, Steele P, Benchimol S, Ross N, Stein BD. Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:1447-1458. [PMID: 33917947 PMCID: PMC8167642 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background-to guide the implementation of patient centricity and engagement in cancer clinical trials (CTs) and to operationalize the Canadianized version of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (C-CTTI) model, the development of a charter was identified by cancer CT stakeholders. Methods-the Canadian Cancer Trial Stakeholder Charter (the Charter) was initiated by Colorectal Cancer Canada (CCC) and developed via the-1-formation of an inclusive working group (WG) that drafted the document using recommendations collected during the development of the C-CTTI model; 2-socialization of the draft Charter to solicit feedback from cancer CT stakeholders, including those who attended the 2019 CCC Conference; and 3-incorporation of stakeholders' feedback and finalization of the Charter by the WG. Results-the Charter was built around five guiding principles-1-patient centricity; 2-commitment to education and training; 3-collaboration as equal and independent partners in research; 4-transparency and accountability; and 5-high standards in data collection integrity and honesty. These principles led to the Charter's five tenets, which stipulate stakeholder commitments, aiming to make CTs accessible to all patients, improve the design and implementation of CTs to benefit patients, expand recruitment and retention of patients in CTs, and further advance cancer research and treatment. Conclusions-the Charter is intended to integrate the patient voice into the Canadian cancer CT continuum. The next phases of the C-CTTI model include the adoption and implementation of the Charter, the establishment of a patient group training program, and the development of real-world evidence/real-world data methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judy Needham
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Stephen Sundquist
- Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network (3CTN), Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada;
| | - Dominique Johnson
- McPeak-Sirois Group for Clinical Research in Breast Cancer, Montreal, QC H2Y 2H2, Canada;
| | - Sabrina Hanna
- The Cancer Collaborative, Montreal, QC H7W 0C3, Canada;
| | | | | | - Patricia Steele
- Colorectal Cancer Canada, Montreal, QC H3G 1J1, Canada; (P.S.); (S.B.)
| | - Sarita Benchimol
- Colorectal Cancer Canada, Montreal, QC H3G 1J1, Canada; (P.S.); (S.B.)
| | | | - Barry D. Stein
- Colorectal Cancer Canada, Montreal, QC H3G 1J1, Canada; (P.S.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jung A, Song L, Snyder E, Louwers RK, Sachse K, Chisolm S, Gore JL, Smith AB. Well-being and Perceptions of Supportive Resources among Caregivers of Patients with Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2021; 7:43-52. [PMID: 38993209 PMCID: PMC11181774 DOI: 10.3233/blc-200412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The unique burden of treatment and survivorship of patients with bladder cancer can negatively impact caregiver experience and their use of supportive care resources. OBJECTIVE To assess caregivers' well-being and their perception of potential supportive resources. METHODS In this cross-sectional survey, caregivers of patients with bladder cancer (N = 630) were recruited through the nationwide Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network. We used stakeholder-developed questionnaires to examine caregiver well-being (i.e., physical well-being, tiredness, fear, worry, sadness), the perceived helpfulness of potential resources (i.e., web-based and print-based information, specialized support, personal stories of other caregivers, phone-call and online chat with other caregivers), and influencing factors. RESULTS Caregivers more frequently reported emotional well-being as a moderate to serious problem (67% for fear, 78% for worry, 66% for sadness) compared with physical well-being (30%) and tiredness (47%). Decreased well-being was associated with female gender of the caregiver, higher than high school education, or caring for a patient with advanced (versus non-invasive) bladder cancer. Of six potential resources, "web-based information" was perceived as "very helpful" among 79% of respondents, followed by "personal stories from other caregivers" (62%). Caregiver preferences for "web-based information" was not associated with any specific demographic or clinical factors. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers reported moderate to serious problems with emotional and physical well-being. Web-based platforms were perceived as beneficial supportive resources for bladder cancer caregivers. Future intervention research should target the influencing factors identified in this study to optimize the health outcomes of caregivers and enhance the supportive care resources for improving their well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahrang Jung
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lixin Song
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Snyder
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Renata K. Louwers
- Research Patient Advocate, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karen Sachse
- Research Patient Advocate, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Chisolm
- Director of Education & Research, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Angela B. Smith
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamad J, Gore J, Chisolm S, Powell M, Lavallee DC, Lipman R, Lindsey N, Smith A. Patient empowerment through engagement in bladder cancer research. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:193.e13-193.e19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
22
|
Catto JWF, Downing A, Mason S, Wright P, Absolom K, Bottomley S, Hounsome L, Hussain S, Varughese M, Raw C, Kelly P, Glaser AW. Quality of Life After Bladder Cancer: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patient-reported Outcomes. Eur Urol 2021; 79:621-632. [PMID: 33581875 PMCID: PMC8082273 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following treatment for bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE To determine this, we undertook a cross-sectional survey covering 10% of the English population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Participants 1-10 yr from diagnosis were identified through national cancer registration data. INTERVENTION A postal survey was administered containing generic HRQOL and BC-specific outcome measures. Findings were compared with those of the general population and other pelvic cancer patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Generic HRQOL was measured using five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30. BC-specific outcomes were derived from EORTC QLQ-BLM30 and EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 1796 surveys were completed (response rate 55%), including 868 (48%) patients with non-muscle-invasive BC, 893 (50%) patients who received radiotherapy or radical cystectomy, and 35 (1.9%) patients for whom treatment was unknown. Most (69%) of the participants reported at least one problem in any EQ-5D dimension. Age/sex-adjusted generic HRQOL outcomes were similar across all stages and treatment groups, whilst problems increased with age (problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions: <65 yr [67% {95% confidence interval or CI: 61-74}] vs 85+ yr [84% {95% CI: 81-89}], p = 0.016) and long-term conditions (no conditions [53% {95% CI: 48-58}] vs more than four conditions [94% {95% CI: 90-97}], p < 0.001). Sexual problems were reported commonly in men, increasing with younger age and radical treatment. Younger participants (under 65 yr) reported more financial difficulties (mean score 20 [95% CI: 16-25]) than those aged 85+ yr (6.8 [4.5-9.2], p < 0.001). HRQOL for BC patients (for comparison, males with problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions 69% [95% CI: 66-72]) was significantly worse than what has been found after colorectal and prostate cancers and in the general population (51% [95% CI: 48-53], all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS HRQOL following BC appears to be relatively independent of disease stage, treatment, and multimodal care. Issues are reported with sexual function and financial toxicity. HRQOL after BC is worse than that after other pelvic cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients living with bladder cancer often have reduced quality of life, which may be worse than that for other common pelvic cancer patients. Age and other illnesses appear to be more important in determining this quality of life than the treatments received. Many men complain of sexual problems. Younger patients have financial worries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Samantha Mason
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Absolom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Bottomley
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Luke Hounsome
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | - Syed Hussain
- Academic Oncology Unit, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mohini Varughese
- Beacon Oncology Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset Foundation Trust, Somerset, UK
| | | | | | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Keane KG, Redmond EJ, McIntyre C, O'Connor E, Madden A, O'Connell C, Inder SM, Smyth LG, Thomas AZ, Flynn RJ, Manecksha RP. Does instillation of lidocaine gel following flexible cystoscopy decrease the severity of post procedure symptoms? A randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of lidocaine gel post flexible cystoscopy. Ir J Med Sci 2021; 190:1553-1559. [PMID: 33449326 PMCID: PMC7809241 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02458-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess whether instillation of lidocaine gel both before and after flexible cystoscopy is more effective at reducing post procedural symptoms than instillation of lidocaine gel pre flexible cystoscopy alone. We hypothesise that inadequate urethral dwell time and dilution of lidocaine gel by the irrigation fluid during flexible cystoscopy limits its anaesthetic efficacy. Only one other study has attempted to reduce bothersome urinary symptoms through an intervention after flexible cystoscopy. Methods This was a randomised controlled trial in which patients were randomised 1:1 to receive lidocaine gel pre and post flexible cystoscopy (treatment) or lidocaine gel pre flexible cystoscopy only (control). Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess symptoms and quality of life prior to cystoscopy, on day 2 and day 7 post cystoscopy. Result Fifty patients were divided equally between the treatment and control groups. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups (p = 1.000). An overall symptoms variable was measured, though no significant difference was found in the distribution of responses between the groups at baseline, 2 or 7 days after the flexible cystoscopy (p = 0.423, 0.651,0.735). In the treatment group, 1 patient (4.0%) presented to a doctor for review following flexible cystoscopy, and 4 patients (16.0%) presented in the control group (p = 0.349). Conclusion Initial study results suggest that post-operative lidocaine does not significantly limit the exacerbation of urinary symptoms following flexible cystoscopy; however, our results are not powered to detect a small difference. We do not recommend a change in practice based on our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K G Keane
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - E J Redmond
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C McIntyre
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E O'Connor
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Madden
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C O'Connell
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S M Inder
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - L G Smyth
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Z Thomas
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R J Flynn
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R P Manecksha
- Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ehlers M, Bjurlin M, Gore J, Pruthi R, Narang G, Tan R, Nielsen M, Zhu A, Deal A, Smith A. A national cross-sectional survey of financial toxicity among bladder cancer patients. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:76.e1-76.e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Impairment and Longitudinal Recovery of Older Adults Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Urol 2020; 205:94-99. [PMID: 32716672 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer includes radical cystectomy, a major surgery that can be associated with significant toxicity. Limited data exist related to changes in patient global health status and recovery following radical cystectomy. We used geriatric assessment to longitudinally compare health related impairments in older and younger patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who undergo radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Older and younger patients (70 or older and younger than 70 years) with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy at an academic institution were enrolled between 2012 and 2019. Patients completed the geriatric assessment before radical cystectomy, and 1, 3 and 12 months after radical cystectomy. For each geriatric assessment measure the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare score distribution between age groups at each time point. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare distributions between time points within each age group. RESULTS A total of 80 patients (42 younger and 38 older) were enrolled. Before radical cystectomy 78% of patients were impaired on at least 1 geriatric assessment measure. Both age groups had worsening physical function and nutrition at 1 month after radical cystectomy, with older patients having a greater decline in function than younger patients. Both groups recovered to baseline at 3 months after radical cystectomy and maintained this status at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS High rates of impairments were found across age groups in the short term after radical cystectomy, followed by recovery to baseline.
Collapse
|
26
|
Varisli L, Cen O, Vlahopoulos S. Dissecting pharmacological effects of chloroquine in cancer treatment: interference with inflammatory signaling pathways. Immunology 2020; 159:257-278. [PMID: 31782148 PMCID: PMC7011648 DOI: 10.1111/imm.13160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Chloroquines are 4-aminoquinoline-based drugs mainly used to treat malaria. At pharmacological concentrations, they have significant effects on tissue homeostasis, targeting diverse signaling pathways in mammalian cells. A key target pathway is autophagy, which regulates macromolecule turnover in the cell. In addition to affecting cellular metabolism and bioenergetic flow equilibrium, autophagy plays a pivotal role at the interface between inflammation and cancer progression. Chloroquines consequently have critical effects in tissue metabolic activity and importantly, in key functions of the immune system. In this article, we will review the work addressing the role of chloroquines in the homeostasis of mammalian tissue, and the potential strengths and weaknesses concerning their use in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lokman Varisli
- Union of Education and Science Workers (EGITIM SEN), Diyarbakir Branch, Diyarbakir, Turkey
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Osman Cen
- Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Natural Sciences, Joliet Jr College, Joliet, IL, USA
| | - Spiros Vlahopoulos
- First Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Corbett CJ, Xia L, Mamtani R, Malkowicz SB, Guzzo TJ. Survival Benefit Persists With Delayed Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer. Urology 2019; 132:143-149. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
28
|
Cole AP, Trinh QD. Trimodal Therapy for Bladder Cancer: You Get What You Don't Pay For. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:e191637. [PMID: 31166585 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander P Cole
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brisbane WG, Schade GR. AUTHOR REPLY. Urology 2019; 125:153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
30
|
McMullen CK, Kwan ML, Colwell JC, Munneke JR, Davis JV, Firemark A, Brooks N, Grant M, Gilbert SM, Altschuler A. Recovering from Cystectomy: Patient Perspectives. Bladder Cancer 2019; 5:51-61. [PMID: 30854413 PMCID: PMC6401661 DOI: 10.3233/blc-180202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer patients who undergo cystectomy and urinary diversion face functional and quality-of-life challenges. Little is known about these patients' experiences during decision-making, surgery, and recovery, or how they vary by treatment setting. OBJECTIVE To learn about patients' experiences with treatment choice, surgical care, and recovery across health settings. Understanding patient experiences is essential to closing care gaps and developing patient-reported measures. METHODS We conducted focus groups with cystectomy patients and family caregivers at a large comprehensive health care system (N = 32 patients) and an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center (N = 25 patients and 5 caregivers). Using standard qualitative methods, we identified themes that are not well-represented in existing research. RESULTS Across both systems, patients described variable experiences in decision-making about their cystectomy and urinary diversion. Some felt overwhelmed by information; others felt poorly informed. Many found self-care equipment challenging; many felt they knew little about what to expect regarding chemotherapy, recovery, and transitioning home. At times, health care personnel could not help manage patients' ostomies or catheterization equipment. Our study also contributes a grounded theoretical framework for describing meaningful domains of patient experience with cystectomy and urinary diversion. We identified a common trajectory that includes decision-making, surgery and post-operative recovery, mastery of self-care, and reintegration. CONCLUSIONS Patients with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion report a wide variety of experiences not captured by quantitative measures. These findings demonstrate that many cystectomy patients could benefit from additional post-operative support. We offer a framework to measure patient-centered domains in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - James V. Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alison Firemark
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Neon Brooks
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bessa A, Maclennan S, Enting D, Bryan R, Josephs D, Hughes S, Amery S, Khan MS, Malde S, Nair R, Cahill F, Wylie H, Thurairaja R, Chatterton K, Kinsella N, Häggström C, Van Hemelrijck M. Consensus in Bladder Cancer Research Priorities Between Patients and Healthcare Professionals Using a Four-stage Modified Delphi Method. Eur Urol 2019; 76:258-259. [PMID: 30712969 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Agustina Bessa
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Deborah Enting
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Dept of Medical Oncology, London, UK
| | - Richard Bryan
- Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Debra Josephs
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Dept of Medical Oncology, London, UK
| | - Simon Hughes
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Suzanne Amery
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Sachin Malde
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rajesh Nair
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fidelma Cahill
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Harriet Wylie
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ramesh Thurairaja
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Chatterton
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Netty Kinsella
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christel Häggström
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Biobank Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brisbane WG, Schade GR. WITHDRAWN: Moving Patient Reported Outcomes Toward Disease-specific Knowledge. Urology 2018:S0090-4295(18)31318-9. [PMID: 30571985 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - George R Schade
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize current knowledge on patient-prioritized outcomes for their bladder cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS Patient-centered outcomes research seeks to help patients identify the right treatment for the right patient at the right time in their care. As such, patient-centered outcomes research relies on studying a treatment's impact on patient-centered outcomes. Some outcomes, like survival, are commonly prioritized by patients and by clinical experts. Patients often place greater emphasis than experts on quality of life outcomes. Thus, many patient-centered outcomes are also patient-reported outcomes. Unique domains that are often prioritized by patients, but overlooked by experts, include the costs and financial impact of care, anxiety, and depression related to a health condition, and the impact of a condition or its treatment on a caregiver or loved one. Patient-centered outcomes are realizing greater recognition for their innate importance and potential to augment the impact of research studies. Although patient-centered outcomes are often patient-reported outcomes, this is not universal. Unique to bladder cancer, the availability of a research-oriented Patient Survey Network intended to identify research questions that are important to patients may be an opportunity to broadly solicit input on patient-centered outcomes for bladder cancer research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356510, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mossanen M, Chu A, Smith AB, Gore JL. Inferring bladder cancer research prioritization from patient-generated online content. World J Urol 2018; 37:1145-1150. [PMID: 30203340 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2479-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients and their families utilize online resources when dealing with a diagnosis of bladder cancer. Many patients have questions regarding clinical management options. Online research forums may help researchers and providers identify research areas of interest. Our objective was to review online forums and identify research questions that are important to patients and families impacted by bladder cancer diagnosis. METHODS We reviewed 1 month of online content from the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Inspire online community ( https://www.inspire.com/groups/bladder-cancer-advocacy-network ). Using affinity diagramming, we categorized the submitted content from patient users into themes stratified by the cancer severity of the patient user (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, muscle-invasive bladder cancer, metastatic bladder cancer). We categorized the content by the audience of forum posts (i.e., inwardly directed, those seeking support, vs. outwardly directed, those sharing personal experiences) and constructed comparative effectiveness research questions from the submitted content. RESULTS From 14 July 2014 to 14 August 2014, a total of 394 forum posts were collected, of which 3 were excluded from analysis due to non-relevant content, leaving 391 comments for final analysis. Almost 38% of posts involved muscle-invasive bladder cancer and 25% of posts were from people other than the patient. Inwardly and outwardly directed posts were commonly related to clinical treatment concerns. CONCLUSIONS Review of online patient-generated content may offer insight into comparative effectiveness research topics of importance to bladder cancer patients. A more formalized process may better represent research priorities among bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Alice Chu
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|