1
|
Bergman J, Filippou P, Suskind AM, Johnson K, Calvert E, Fero K, Lorenz KA, Giannitrapani K, Hugar L, Koo K, Leppert J, Scales CD, Terris M, Nielsen M, Gore JL. Primary Palliative Care in Urology: Quality Improvement Summit 2021-2022. Urol Pract 2024; 11:529-536. [PMID: 38451199 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The AUA convened a 2021-2022 Quality Improvement Summit to bring together interdisciplinary providers to inform the current state and to discuss potential strategies for integrating primary palliative care into urology practice. We hypothesized that the Summit findings would inform a scalable primary palliative care model for urology. METHODS The 3-part summit reached a total of 160 interdisciplinary health care professionals. Webinar 1, "Building a Primary Palliative Care Model for Urology," focused on a urologist's role in palliative care. Webinar 2, "Perspectives on Increasing the Use of Palliative Care in Advanced Urologic Disease," addressed barriers to possible implementation of a primary palliative care model. The in-person Summit, "Laying the Foundation for Primary Palliative Care in Urology," focused on operationalization of primary palliative care, clinical innovations needed, and relevant metrics. RESULTS Participants agreed that palliative care is needed early in the disease course for patients with advanced disease, including those with benign and malignant conditions. The group agreed about the important domains that should be addressed as well as the interdisciplinary providers who are best suited to address each domain. There was consensus that a primary "quarterback" was needed, encapsulated in a conceptual model-UroPal-with a urologist at the hub of care. CONCLUSIONS The Summit provides the field of urology with a framework and specific steps that can be taken to move urology-palliative care integration forward. Urologists are uniquely positioned to provide primary palliative care for their many patients with serious illness, both in the surgical and chronic care contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Bergman
- The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, California
- Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, California
| | - Pauline Filippou
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California
| | - Anne M Suskind
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Karen Johnson
- American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland
| | - Emily Calvert
- American Urological Association, Linthicum, Maryland
| | - Katherine Fero
- The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Karleen Giannitrapani
- Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lee Hugar
- Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, South Carolina
| | | | - John Leppert
- Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | | | - Matthew Nielsen
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John L Gore
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Psutka SP, Veleber S, Siman J, Holt SK, Jannat S, Wright JL, Lin DW, Gore JL, Schade GR, Annen Z, Greenlee H. Phase 1/2 Randomized Clinical Trial of In-clinic acupuncture Prior to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00091-9. [PMID: 38653622 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment-related dose-limiting dysuria and irritative bladder symptoms are common in patients receiving intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) to treat non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Acupuncture has been shown to reduce pain and urinary urgency/frequency in other patient populations. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of weekly in-clinic preprocedural acupuncture among patients receiving induction BCG. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with high-risk NMIBC undergoing induction BCG were randomized 2:1 to a standardized acupuncture protocol (acupuncture) versus the standard-of-care control arm. INTERVENTION In-office acupuncture prior to each BCG instillation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES Feasibility was assessed via recruitment, retention, and intervention adherence. Acupuncture safety and tolerability were assessed via physician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included BCG treatment adherence, patient-reported BCG-related toxicity, and bladder cancer-specific and generic (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC]-QLQ-NMIBC-24 and EORTC-QLQ-NMIBC-C30) quality of life (QOL). Subjective assessments of acupuncture acceptability were performed through patient surveys. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 43 individuals were randomized 2:1 to the acupuncture (n = 28) versus control (n = 15) group. The median age was 70.3 yr, and 76% were male. Week 7 follow-up surveys were completed by 93%; six participants withdrew early due to disease progression, refractory gross hematuria, or preference. Acupuncture was delivered successfully prior to each BCG treatment, with no acupuncture-related AEs or interruptions to induction BCG. BCG-attributed AEs were reported by 91% acupuncture and 100% control individuals, including pain (28% vs 43%, p = 0.34) and urinary symptoms (62% vs 79%, p = 0.31). Comparing acupuncture patients with controls, change in QOL over the study period demonstrated greater improvements in median urinary symptoms (9.5, interquartile range [IQR] 0.0-19.0 vs 0.0, IQR -14.3 to 7.1; p = 0.02) among patients in the acupuncture arm. Of the acupuncture patients, 96% reported that acupuncture was "very/extremely helpful," and 91% would recommend acupuncture to other patients. Limitations include modest sample size and single-institution design. CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture prior to induction BCG treatments is feasible and safe. In this phase 1/2 trial, improved urinary function scores were observed among patients undergoing acupuncture. Patients receiving acupuncture reported high degrees of satisfaction with treatments. PATIENT SUMMARY We evaluated the safety and feasibility of delivering acupuncture in a urology clinic prior to weekly intravesical bladder cancer treatments with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in a randomized controlled trial. We found that acupuncture could be delivered safely prior to weekly BCG instillations and that the use of acupuncture was associated with high patient satisfaction and a decrease in patient-reported urinary symptoms compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Susan Veleber
- Integrative Medicine Program, Division of Supportive Care, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan Siman
- Integrative Medicine Program, Division of Supportive Care, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Samia Jannat
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George R Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Zachary Annen
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Heather Greenlee
- Integrative Medicine Program, Division of Supportive Care, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singh Z, Holt SK, Gore JL, Nyame YA, Wright JL, Schade GR. Chronic Glucocorticoid Use and Risk for Advanced Prostate Cancer at Presentation: A SEER-Medicare Cohort Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:68-73.e2. [PMID: 37806926 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Examine the relationship between exposure to systemic glucocorticoids (steroids) and advanced prostate cancer (PCa) at presentation. Prior work suggested that steroid use may be associated with increased PCa risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS We queried the linked SEER-Medicare database (2004-2015) to identify PSA screened patients diagnosed with PCa. Criteria for screening included a PSA lab test or DRE exam in both the 12 month and 13 to 36 month periods prior to diagnosis of PCa. Steroid exposure was determined using Medicare Part D and groups were divided based on duration of use in the 3 years prior to diagnosis: controls with no exposure, <30 days, 30 days - 1 year, 1 to 2 years, and >2+ years. Advanced PCa was defined as systemic metastases or regional lymph node metastasis at presentation. Risk estimates for advanced PCa at presentation for steroid exposure groups vs. controls were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS We identified 22,920 PSA screened patients diagnosed with PCa of which 29% used glucocorticoids in the exposure period. The mean (SD) duration for glucocorticoid use (in days) among all steroid users was 76.7 days (192.1). On univariable and multivariable analyses, > 2 years of steroid exposure was associated with significantly increased risk for advanced PCa (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.35-3.14 and OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.12-2.69, respectively). CONCLUSION In this population-based PSA-screened cohort, prolonged steroid use was associated with increased risk of advanced PCa at diagnosis. With the widespread use of glucocorticoids, it is important to consider the role steroids may play in PCa pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorawar Singh
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Smith Institute for Urology at Northwell Health of the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - George R Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gore JL, Follmer K, Reynolds J, Nash M, Anderson CB, Catto JWF, Chamie K, Daneshmand S, Dickstein R, Garg T, Gilbert SM, Guzzo TJ, Kamat AM, Kates MR, Lane BR, Lotan Y, Mansour AM, Master VA, Montgomery JS, Morris DS, Nepple KG, O'Neil BB, Patel S, Pohar K, Porten SP, Riggs SB, Sankin A, Scarpato KR, Shore ND, Steinberg GD, Strope SA, Taylor JM, Comstock BA, Kessler LG, Wolff EM, Smith AB. Interruptions in bladder cancer care during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:116.e17-116.e21. [PMID: 38087711 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Academic and community urology centers participating in a pragmatic clinical trial in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer completed monthly surveys assessing restrictions in aspects of bladder cancer care due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Our objective was to describe pandemic-related restrictions on bladder cancer care. METHODS We invited 32 sites participating in a multicenter pragmatic bladder cancer trial to complete monthly surveys distributed through REDCap beginning in May 2020. These surveys queried sites on whether they were experiencing restrictions in the use of elective surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), radical cystectomy, office cystoscopy, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) availability. Responses were collated with descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of 32 eligible sites, 21 sites had at least a 50% monthly response rate over the study period and were included in the analysis. Elective surgery was paused at 76% of sites in May 2020, 48% of sites in January 2021, and 52% of sites in January 2022. Over those same periods, coinciding with COVID-19 incidence waves, TURBT was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 14% of sites, respectively, radical cystectomy was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 19% of sites, respectively, and cystoscopy was restricted at 33%, 0%, and 10% of sites, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cancer care was minimally restricted compared with more pronounced restrictions seen in general elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | - Kristin Follmer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jason Reynolds
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - James W F Catto
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS (National Health Service) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rian Dickstein
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD; Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tullika Garg
- Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa FL
| | - Thomas J Guzzo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Max R Kates
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ahmed M Mansour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Brock B O'Neil
- Division of Urology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Sanjay Patel
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Kamal Pohar
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Stephen B Riggs
- Department of Urology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Kristen R Scarpato
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Jennifer M Taylor
- Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Bryan A Comstock
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Larry G Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown B, Holt S, Dindinger-Hill K, Wolff EM, Javid S, Nyame Y, Gore JL. Urgent versus elective surgical disparities among American Indian and Alaska Native patients. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38497974 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) health issues are understudied despite documentation of lower-than-average life expectancy. Urgent surgery is associated with higher rates of postsurgical complications and postoperative death. We assess whether American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) patients in Washington State are at greater risk of requiring urgent rather than elective surgery compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS We accessed data for the period 2009-2014 from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System (CHARS) database, which captures all statewide hospital admissions, to examine three common surgeries that are performed both urgently and electively: hip replacements, aortic valve replacements, and spinal fusions. We extracted patient race, age, insurance status, comorbidity, admission type, and procedures performed. We then constructed multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with use of urgent surgical care. RESULTS AIAN patients had lower mean age at surgery for all three surgeries compared with NHW patients. AIAN patients were at higher risk for urgent surgery for hip replacements (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.19-1.88), spinal fusions (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.87), and aortic valve replacements (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.12-3.80). CONCLUSION AIAN patients were more likely to undergo urgent hip replacement, spinal fusion, and aortic valve replacement than NHW patients. AIAN patients underwent urgent surgery at younger ages. Medicaid insurance conferred higher risks for urgent surgery across all surgeries studied. Further research is warranted to more clearly identify the factors contributing to disparities among AIAN patients undergoing urgent surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Brown
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sarah Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sara Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yaw Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hammarlund N, Holt SK, Basu A, Etzioni R, Morehead D, Lee JR, Wolff EM, Gore JL, Nyame YA. Isolating the Drivers of Racial Inequities in Prostate Cancer Treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:435-441. [PMID: 38214587 PMCID: PMC10922444 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black individuals in the United States are less likely than White individuals to receive curative therapies despite a 2-fold higher risk of prostate cancer death. While research has described treatment inequities, few studies have investigated underlying causes. METHODS We analyzed a cohort of 40,137 Medicare beneficiaries (66 and older) linked to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry who had clinically significant, non-metastatic (cT1-4N0M0, grade group 2-5) prostate cancer (diagnosed 2010-2015). Using the Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, we assessed the contributions of patient health and health care delivery on the racial difference in localized prostate cancer treatments (radical prostatectomy or radiation). Patient health consisted of comorbid diagnoses, tumor characteristics, SEER site, diagnosis year, and age. Health care delivery was captured as a prediction model with these health variables as predictors of treatment, reflecting current treatment patterns. RESULTS A total of 72.1% and 78.6% of Black and White patients received definitive treatment, respectively, a difference of 6.5 percentage points. An estimated 15% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6-24] of this treatment difference was explained by measured differences in patient health, leaving the remaining estimated 85% (95% CI: 74-94) attributable to a potentially broad range of health care delivery factors. Limitations included insufficient data to explore how specific health care delivery factors, including structural racism and social determinants, impact differential treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our results show the inadequacy of patient health differences as an explanation of the treatment inequity. IMPACT Investing in studies and interventions that support equitable health care delivery for Black individuals with prostate cancer will contribute to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Hammarlund
- Department of Health Services Research Management & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA, USA
| | - Sarah K. Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- The CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ruth Etzioni
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danté Morehead
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jenney R Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA, USA
| | - Erika M. Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA, USA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yaw A. Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peters CE, Seideman CA, Kauderer S, Gore JL, Holt SK, Mehta A, Singer EA, Tabakin AL, Thavaseelan S, Vemulakonda V, Posid T, Velez D. Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making Among Urology Applicants. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00130-4. [PMID: 38431159 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
MATERIALS AND METHODS An Institutional Review Board-exempt REDCap survey was distributed through the Society of Academic Urologists to all 508 applicants registered for the 2023 Urology Match following the rank list submission deadline on January 10, 2023. The survey closed on February 1, 2023. Responses were anonymized, aggregated, and characterized using descriptive statistics. Thematic mapping of open text comments was performed by 2 reviewers. RESULTS The response rate was 42% (215/508). Eighty-eight percent of respondents disapproved of the Dobbs ruling. Twenty percent of respondents (15% male/24% female) eliminated programs in states where abortion is illegal. Fifty-nine percent (51% male/70% female) would be concerned for their or their partner's health if they matched in a state where abortion was illegal, and 66% (55% male/82% female) would want their program to assist them or their partner if they required abortion care during residency. Due to the competitive nature of Urology, 68% of applicants reported feeling at least somewhat obligated to apply in states where abortion legislation conflicts with their beliefs. Of the 65 comments provided by respondents, 4 common themes emerged: (1) avoidance of states with restrictive abortion laws; (2) inability to limit applications because of the competitiveness of urology; (3) impacts on personal health care; and (4) desire for advocacy from professional urology organizations. CONCLUSION The Dobbs ruling will impact the urology workforce by affecting urology applicants' decision-making regarding residency selection and ranking. Although the competitiveness of the Urology Match pressures applicants to apply broadly, many are taking reproductive health care access into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric A Singer
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Alexandra L Tabakin
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Uniondale, NY.
| | | | | | - Tasha Posid
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Danielle Velez
- Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, Alva A, Bagshaw H, Baine M, Beckermann K, Carlo MI, Choueiri TK, Costello BA, Derweesh IH, Desai A, Ged Y, George S, Gore JL, Gunn A, Haas N, Johnson M, Kapur P, King J, Kyriakopoulos C, Lam ET, Lara PN, Lau C, Lewis B, Madoff DC, Manley B, Michaelson MD, Mortazavi A, Ponsky L, Ramalingam S, Shuch B, Smith ZL, Sosman J, Sweis R, Zibelman M, Schonfeld R, Stein M, Gurski LA. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22:4-16. [PMID: 38394781 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the systemic therapy options for patients with advanced RCC and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Jonasch
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Ajjai Alva
- 4University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Arpita Desai
- 11UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Yasser Ged
- 12The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | - Naomi Haas
- 16Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Johnson
- 17Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Payal Kapur
- 18UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Jennifer King
- 19Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amir Mortazavi
- 28The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Lee Ponsky
- 29Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Zachary L Smith
- 17Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Jeffrey Sosman
- 32Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Randy Sweis
- 33The UChicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sangameswaran S, Casanova-Perez R, Patel H, Cronkite DJ, Idris A, Rosenberg DE, Wright JL, Gore JL, Hartzler AL. Improving physical activity among prostate cancer survivors through a peer-based digital walking program. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2024; 2023:608-617. [PMID: 38222338 PMCID: PMC10785891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Physical activity is important for prostate cancer survivors. Yet survivors face significant barriers to traditional structured exercise programs, limiting engagement and impact. Digital programs that incorporate fitness trackers and peer support via social media have potential to improve the reach and impact of traditional support. Using a digital walking program with prostate cancer survivors, we employed mixed methods to assess program outcomes, engagement, perceived utility, and social influence. After 6 weeks of program use, survivors and loved ones (n=18) significantly increased their average daily step count. Although engagement and perceived utility of using a fitness tracker and interacting with walking buddies was high, social media engagement and utility were limited. Group strategies associated with social influence were driven more by group attraction to the collective task of walking than by interpersonal bonds. Findings demonstrate the feasibility of a digital walking program to improve physical activity and extend the reach of traditional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savitha Sangameswaran
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Reggie Casanova-Perez
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Harsh Patel
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David J Cronkite
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ayah Idris
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dori E Rosenberg
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - John L Gore
- Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea L Hartzler
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gadzinski AJ, Dwyer EM, Reynolds J, Stewart B, Abarro I, Wolff EM, Ellimoottil C, Holt SK, Gore JL. Interstate Telemedicine for Urologic Cancer Care. J Urol 2024; 211:55-62. [PMID: 37831635 PMCID: PMC10842529 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE US states eased licensing restrictions on telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing interstate use. As waivers expire, optimal uses of telemedicine must be assessed to inform policy, legislation, and clinical care. We assessed whether telemedicine visits provided the same patient experience as in-person visits, stratified by in- vs out-of-state residence, and examined the financial burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients seen in person and via telemedicine for urologic cancer care at a major regional cancer center received a survey after their first appointment (August 2019-June 2022) on satisfaction with care, perceptions of communication during their visit, travel time, travel costs, and days of work missed. RESULTS Surveys were completed for 1058 patient visits (N = 178 in-person, N = 880 telemedicine). Satisfaction rates were high for all visit types, both interstate and in-state care (mean score 60.1-60.8 [maximum 63], P > .05). More patients convening interstate telemedicine would repeat that modality (71%) than interstate in-person care (61%) or in-state telemedicine (57%). Patients receiving interstate care had significantly higher travel costs (median estimated visit costs $200, IQR $0-$800 vs median $0, IQR $0-$20 for in-state care, P < .001); 55% of patients receiving interstate in-person care required plane travel and 60% required a hotel stay. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine appointments may increase access for rural-residing patients with cancer. Satisfaction outcomes among patients with urologic cancer receiving interstate care were similar to those of patients cared for in state; costs were markedly lower. Extending interstate exemptions beyond COVID-19 licensing waivers would permit continued delivery of high-quality urologic cancer care to rural-residing patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin M Dwyer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jason Reynolds
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Blair Stewart
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Isabelle Abarro
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Chad Ellimoottil
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gore JL, Wolff EM, Comstock BA, Follmer KM, Nash MG, Basu A, Chisolm S, MacLean DB, Lee JR, Lotan Y, Porten SP, Steinberg GD, Chang SS, Gilbert SM, Kessler LG, Smith AB. Protocol of the Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options (CISTO) study: a pragmatic, prospective multicenter observational cohort study of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1127. [PMID: 37980511 PMCID: PMC10657633 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11605-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer poses a significant public health burden, with high recurrence and progression rates in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Current treatment options include bladder-sparing therapies (BST) and radical cystectomy, both with associated risks and benefits. However, evidence supporting optimal management decisions for patients with recurrent high-grade NMIBC remains limited, leading to uncertainty for patients and clinicians. The CISTO (Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options) Study aims to address this critical knowledge gap by comparing outcomes between patients undergoing BST and radical cystectomy. METHODS The CISTO Study is a pragmatic, prospective observational cohort trial across 36 academic and community urology practices in the US. The study will enroll 572 patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who select management with either BST or radical cystectomy. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life (QOL) at 12 months as measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Secondary outcomes include bladder cancer-specific QOL, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and financial toxicity. The study will also assess patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Statistical analyses will employ targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) to address treatment selection bias and confounding by indication. DISCUSSION The CISTO Study is powered to detect clinically important differences in QOL and cancer-specific survival between the two treatment approaches. By including a diverse patient population, the study also aims to assess outcomes across the following patient characteristics: age, gender, race, burden of comorbid health conditions, cancer severity, caregiver status, social determinants of health, and rurality. Treatment outcomes may also vary by patient preferences, health literacy, and baseline QOL. The CISTO Study will fill a crucial evidence gap in the management of recurrent high-grade NMIBC, providing evidence-based guidance for patients and clinicians in choosing between BST and radical cystectomy. The CISTO study will provide an evidence-based approach to identifying the right treatment for the right patient at the right time in the challenging clinical setting of recurrent high-grade NMIBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03933826. Registered on May 1, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bryan A Comstock
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Michael G Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Departments of Pharmacy, Health Services, and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Jenney R Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Larry G Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nyame YA, Gore JL, Lin DW. Putting patients first to redefine prostate cancer classifications. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1249-1251. [PMID: 37463855 PMCID: PMC10637029 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cabral J, Holt SK, Washington SL, Dwyer E, Lee JR, Wolff EM, Gore JL, Nyame YA. Inequities in Definitive Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer Among Those With Clinically Significant Mental Health Disorders. Urol Pract 2023; 10:656-663. [PMID: 37754206 PMCID: PMC10681572 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with mental health disorders are at risk for receiving inequitable cancer treatment, likely resulting from various structural, social, and health-related factors. This study aims to assess the relationship between mental health disorders and the use of definitive treatment in a population-based cohort of those with localized, clinically significant prostate cancer. METHODS We conducted a cohort study analysis in SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-Medicare (2004-2015). History of a mental health disorder was defined as presence of specific ICD (International Classification of Diseases)-9 or ICD-10 diagnostic codes in the 2 years preceding cancer diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between mental health disorders and definitive treatment utilization (defined as surgery or radiation). RESULTS Of 101,042 individuals with prostate cancer, 7,945 (7.8%) had a diagnosis of a mental health disorder. They were more likely to be unpartnered, have a lower socioeconomic status, and less likely to receive definitive treatment (61.8% vs 68.2%, P < .001). Definitive treatment rates were >66%, 62.8%, 60.3%, 58.2%, 54.3%, and 48.1% for post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, substance abuse disorder, and schizophrenia, respectively. After adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, marital status and socioeconomic status, history of a mental health disorder was associated with decreased odds of receiving definitive treatment (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.83). CONCLUSIONS Individuals with mental health disorders and prostate cancer represent a vulnerable population; careful attention to clinical and social needs is required to support appropriate use of beneficial treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Cabral
- Section of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Samuel L Washington
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Erin Dwyer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jenney R Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dursun F, Elshabrawy A, Wang H, Kaushik D, Liss MA, Svatek RS, Gore JL, Mansour AM. Impact of rural residence on the presentation, management and survival of patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Investig Clin Urol 2023; 64:561-571. [PMID: 37932567 PMCID: PMC10630682 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the impact of rural and remote residence on the receipt of guidelines-recommended treatment, quality of treatment and overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with MIBC were identified using National Cancer Database. Patients were classified into three residential areas. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between geographic residence and receipt of radical cystectomy (RC) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Models were fitted to assess quality benchmarks of RC and CRT. RESULTS We identified 71,395 patients. Of those 58,874 (82.5%) were living in Metro areas, 8,534 (11.9%) in urban-rural adjacent (URA), and 3,987 (5.6%) in urban-rural remote to metro area (URR). URR residence was significantly associated with poor OS compared to URA and Metro residence (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94 and HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.93, p<0.001). There was no difference in the likelihood of receiving RC and CRT among different residential areas. Among patients who underwent RC; individuals living in URR were less likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adequate lymph node dissection, and had a higher probability of positive surgical margin than those living in metro areas. For those who received CRT; individuals living in Metro areas were more likely to receive concomitant systemic therapy compared to URR. CONCLUSIONS Rural residence is associated with lower OS for MIBC patients and less likelihood of meeting quality benchmarks for RC and CRT. This data should be used to guide further health policy and allocation of resources for rural population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Furkan Dursun
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Ahmed Elshabrawy
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Hanzhang Wang
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Dharam Kaushik
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
- UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Liss
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
- UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
- UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ahmed M Mansour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
- UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mossanen M, Smith AB, Onochie N, Matulewicz R, Bjurlin MA, Kibel AS, Abbas M, Shore N, Chisolm S, Bangs R, Cooper Z, Gore JL. Bladder cancer patient and provider perspectives on smoking cessation. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:457.e9-457.e16. [PMID: 37805339 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking is the most common risk factor for bladder cancer and is associated with adverse clinical and cancer-related outcomes. Increasing understanding of the patient and provider perspectives on smoking cessation may provide insight into improving smoking cessation rates among bladder cancer survivors. We sought to inform strategies for providers promoting cessation efforts and help patients quit smoking. METHODS Using a modified Delphi process with multidisciplinary input from bladder cancer providers, researchers, and a patient advocate, 2 surveys were created for bladder cancer patients and providers. Surveys included multiple-choice questions and free answers. The survey was administered electronically and queried participants' perspectives on barriers and facilitators associated with smoking cessation. Survey responses were anonymous, and participants were provided with a $20 Amazon gift card for participating. Patients were approached through the previously established Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Patient Survey Network, an online bladder cancer patient and caregiver community. Providers were recruited from the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) and the Large Urology Group Practice Association (LUGPA). RESULTS From May to June 2021, 308 patients and 103 providers completed their respective surveys. Among patients who quit smoking, most (64%) preferred no pharmacologic intervention ("cold turkey") followed by nicotine replacement therapy (28%). Repeated efforts at cessation commonly occurred, and 67% reported making more than one attempt at quitting prior to eventual smoking cessation. Approximately 1 in 10 patients were unaware of the association between bladder cancer and smoking. Among providers, 75% felt that barriers to provide cessation include a lack of clinical time, adequate training, and reimbursement concerns. However, 79% of providers endorsed a willingness to receive continuing education on smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cancer patients utilize a variety of cessation strategies with "cold turkey" being the most used method, and many patients make multiple attempts at smoking cessation. Providers confront multiple barriers to conducting smoking cessation, including inadequate time and training in cessation methods; however, most would be willing to receive additional education. These results inform future interventions tailored to bladder cancer clinicians to better support provider efforts to provide smoking cessation counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA; Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA.
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Richard Matulewicz
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Department of Urology, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Muhammad Abbas
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Neal Shore
- GenesisCare, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
| | | | - Rick Bangs
- GenesisCare, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC; Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD
| | - Zara Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gupta RT, Kalisz K, Khatri G, Caserta MP, Catanzano TM, Chang SD, De Leon AD, Gore JL, Nicola R, Prabhakar AM, Savage SJ, Shah KP, Surabhi VR, Taffel MT, Valente JH, Yoo DC, Nikolaidis P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset Flank Pain-Suspicion of Stone Disease (Urolithiasis). J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S315-S328. [PMID: 38040458 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Noncontrast CT (NCCT) is the imaging study of choice for initial evaluation of patients with acute onset of flank pain and suspicion of stone disease without known prior stone disease. NCCT can reliably characterize the location and size of an offending ureteral calculus, identify complications, and diagnose alternative etiologies of abdominal pain. Although less sensitive in the detection of stones, ultrasound may have a role in evaluating for signs of obstruction. Radiography potentially has a role, although has been shown to be less sensitive than NCCT. For patients with known disease and recurrent symptoms of urolithiasis, NCCT remains the test of choice for evaluation. In pregnancy, given radiation concerns, ultrasound is recommended as the initial modality of choice with potential role for noncontrast MRI. In scenarios where stone disease suspected and initial NCCT is inconclusive, contrast-enhanced imaging, either with MRI or CT/CT urogram may be appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Kevin Kalisz
- Research Author, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Panel Chair, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | - Silvia D Chang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Urological Association
| | - Refky Nicola
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Anand M Prabhakar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | - Stephen J Savage
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; American Urological Association
| | - Kevin P Shah
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Primary care physician
| | | | - Myles T Taffel
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan H Valente
- Rhode Island Hospital and Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brady L, Lee JR, Yu EY, Lin D, Gore JL, Nelson PS, Shiely F, Nyame YA. Determining clinical perspectives and strategies for improving enrollment of minoritized communities in prostate cancer clinical trials. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2023; 11:385-394. [PMID: 37941652 PMCID: PMC10628627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black men and other minoritized populations have represented 4-5% or less of participants in most practice-informing clinical trials. This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinicians around equity and inclusion in prostate cancer clinical trial initiatives in the United States. METHODS An anonymous, web-based questionnaire was administered via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) with questions focused on inclusivity of minoritized populations with respect to race and ethnicity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. The survey link was distributed across the United States via several professional organizations, prostate cancer groups, and social media. Responses were analyzed both quantitatively (descriptive statistics) and qualitatively (thematic analysis). RESULTS Overall, 131 respondents completed the survey (70% self-identified as White, 17% as Asian, and 6% as Black). Most respondents practiced in an urban setting (89%). Of those who engaged in outreach with minoritized communities during the trial design process, 69% observed improved enrollment of minoritized populations. However, 18% of respondents noted that outreach alone does not overcome existing structural barriers to participation in clinical trials. Thematic analysis identified four key areas to address for improving equity: structural, health system, trial-/study-specific, and relationship-/engagement-related factors. CONCLUSION Study participants demonstrated a knowledge of the importance of improving equity in prostate cancer clinical trials research. Designing trials that reduce issues associated with access and improving community outreach were emphasized as key focus areas for reducing health disparities in prostate cancer clinical trials research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Brady
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
| | - Jenney R Lee
- School of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- School of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel Lin
- School of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- School of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter S Nelson
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
- School of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Yaw A Nyame
- School of Medicine, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peters CE, Lee J, Holt SK, Wolff E, Gore JL, Seideman CA. Attitudes Among Society of Women in Urology Members Toward Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Urology 2023; 180:295-302. [PMID: 37390972 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate attitudes of women in urology regarding the Supreme Court ruling Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, including impacts on personal/professional decision-making and the urology workforce. METHODS An IRB-exempt survey including Likert questions on participant views and free text questions was distributed to 1200 members of the Society of Women in Urology on 9/2/2022. Participants were medical students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing/retired urologists over 18. Responses were anonymous and aggregated. Quantitative responses were characterized with descriptive statistics and free-text responses were analyzed using thematic mapping. To complement this analysis, urologist density was mapped by county using 2021 National Provider Identifier data. State abortion laws were categorized based on Guttmacher Institute data on 10/20/2022. Data were analyzed using logistic regression, Poisson regression, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS 329 respondents completed the survey. 88% disagree/strongly disagree with the Dobbs ruling. 42% of trainees may have changed their rank list if current abortion laws existed during their match. 60% of respondents said Dobbs will impact where they choose their next job. 61.5% of counties had zero urologists in 2021, 76% of which were in states with restrictive abortion laws. Urologist density was inversely associated with abortion law restrictiveness compared with the most protective counties. CONCLUSION The Dobbs ruling will significantly impact the urology workforce. Trainees may change how they rank programs in states with restrictive abortion laws, and urologists may consider abortion laws when choosing jobs. Restrictive states are at higher risk for worsening access to urologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe E Peters
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA.
| | - Jenney Lee
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - Erika Wolff
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - Casey A Seideman
- Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Urology, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Peters CE, Lee J, Holt SK, Wolff E, Gore JL, Seideman CA. AUTHOR REPLY. Urology 2023; 180:301-302. [PMID: 37558582 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe E Peters
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA.
| | - Jenney Lee
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - Erika Wolff
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Department of Urology, Seattle, WA
| | - Casey A Seideman
- Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Urology, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dwyer ER, Holt SK, Wolff EM, Stewart B, Katz R, Reynolds J, Gadzinski AJ, Gore JL. Patient-centered outcomes of telehealth for the care of rural-residing patients with urologic cancer. Cancer 2023; 129:2887-2892. [PMID: 37221660 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients residing in rural areas with urologic cancers confront significant obstacles in obtaining oncologic care. In the Pacific Northwest, a sizeable portion of the population lives in a rural county. Telehealth offers a potential access solution. METHODS Patients receiving urologic care through telehealth or an in-person appointment at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, Washington, were surveyed to assess appointment-related satisfaction and travel costs. Patients' residences were classified as rural or urban based on their self-reported ZIP code. Median patient satisfaction scores and appointment-related travel costs were compared by rural versus urban residence within telehealth and in-person appointment groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank or χ2 testing. RESULTS A total of 1091 patients seen for urologic cancer care between June 2019 and April 2022 were included, 28.7% of which resided in a rural county. Patients were mostly non-Hispanic White (75%) and covered by Medicare (58%). Among rural-residing patients, telehealth and in-person appointment groups had the same median satisfaction score (61; interquartile ratio, 58, 63). More rural-residing than urban-residing patients in the telehealth appointment groups strongly agreed that "Considering the cost and time commitment of my appointment, I would choose to meet with my provider in this setting in the future" (67% vs. 58%, p = .03). Rural-residing patients with in-person appointments carried a higher financial burden than those with telehealth appointments (medians, $80 vs. $0; p <.001). CONCLUSIONS Appointment-related costs are high among rural-residing patients traveling for urologic oncologic care. Telehealth provides an affordable solution that does not compromise patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin R Dwyer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Blair Stewart
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ronit Katz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jason Reynolds
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sekar RR, Diamantopoulos LN, Bakaloudi DR, Khaki AR, Grivas P, Winters BR, Vakar-Lopez F, Tretiakova MS, Psutka SP, Holt SK, Gore JL, Lin DW, Schade GR, Hsieh AC, Lee JK, Yezefski T, Schweizer MT, Cheng HH, Yu EY, True LD, Montgomery RB, Wright JL. Sarcomatoid Urothelial Carcinoma Is Associated With Limited Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Poor Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:507.e1-507.e14. [PMID: 37150667 PMCID: PMC10621753 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To examine oncologic outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively queried our institutional database (2003-18) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare (2004-2015) for patients with cT2-4, N0-2, M0 SUC and conventional UC (CUC) treated with RC. Clinicopathologic characteristics were described using descriptive statistics (t test, χ2-test and log-rank-test for group comparison). Overall (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) after RC were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method and associations with OS were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS We identified 38 patients with SUC and 287 patients with CUC in our database, and 190 patients with SUC in SEER-Medicare. In the institutional cohort, patients with SUC versus CUC had higher rates of pT3/4 stage (66% vs. 35%, P < 0.001), lower rates of ypT0N0 (6% vs. 35%, P = .02), and worse median OS (17.5 vs. 120 months, P < .001). Further, patients with SUC in the institutional versus SEER-Medicare cohort had similar median OS (17.5 vs. 21 months). In both cohorts, OS was comparable between patients with SUC undergoing NAC+RC vs. RC alone (17.5 vs. 18.4 months, P = .98, institutional cohort; 24 vs. 20 months, P = .56, SEER cohort). In Cox proportional hazards models for the institutional RC cohort, SUC was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8, P = .001). CONCLUSION SUC demonstrates poor pathologic response to NAC and worse OS compared with CUC, with no OS benefit associated with NAC. A unique pattern of rapid abdominopelvic cystic recurrence was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi R Sekar
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | | | - Dimitra R Bakaloudi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Brian R Winters
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Bellevue, Washington
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria S Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - George R Schade
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew C Hsieh
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - John K Lee
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Todd Yezefski
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael T Schweizer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lawrence D True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - R Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Barbour AB, Kirste S, Grosu AL, Siva S, Louie AV, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Teh BS, Psutka SP, Weg ES, Chen JJ, Zeng J, Gore JL, Hall E, Liao JJ, Correa RJM, Lo SS. The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Primary Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3672. [PMID: 37509333 PMCID: PMC10377531 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized renal cell carcinoma is primarily managed surgically, but this disease commonly presents in highly comorbid patients who are poor operative candidates. Less invasive techniques, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, are effective, but require percutaneous or laparoscopic access, while generally being limited to cT1a tumors without proximity to the renal pelvis or ureter. Active surveillance is another management option for small renal masses, but many patients desire treatment or are poor candidates for active surveillance. For poor surgical candidates, a growing body of evidence supports stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a safe and effective non-invasive treatment modality. For example, a recent multi-institution individual patient data meta-analysis of 190 patients managed with SABR estimated a 5.5% five-year cumulative incidence of local failure with one patient experiencing grade 4 toxicity, and no other grade ≥3 toxic events. Here, we discuss the recent developments in SABR for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma, highlighting key concepts of appropriate patient selection, treatment design, treatment delivery, and response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Liga Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emily S Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Evan Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Koehne EL, Gore JL. Editorial Comment. J Urol 2023; 209:1106. [PMID: 36950915 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003395.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Early pregnancy loss (EPL), or miscarriage, is the most common complication of early pregnancy, and many patients experiencing EPL present to the emergency department (ED). Little is known about how patients who present to the ED with EPL differ from those who present to outpatient clinics and how their management and outcomes differ. OBJECTIVE To compare the management and outcomes of patients with EPL who present to the ED vs outpatient clinics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Research Database, a national insurance claims database. Participants were pregnant people aged 15 to 49 years in the US who presented to either an ED or outpatient clinic for initial diagnosis of EPL from October 2015 through December 2019. Data analysis was performed from May 2021 to March 2022. EXPOSURES The primary exposure was location of service (ED vs outpatient clinic). Other exposures of interest included demographic characteristics, current pregnancy history, and comorbidities. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was EPL management type (surgical, medication, or expectant management). Complications, including blood transfusion and hospitalization, and characteristics associated with location of service were also evaluated. Bivariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used for data analysis. RESULTS A total of 117 749 patients with EPL diagnoses were identified, with a mean (SD) age of 31.8 (6.1) years. Of these patients, 20 826 (17.7%) initially presented to the ED, and 96 923 (82.3%) presented to outpatient clinics. Compared with the outpatient setting, patients in the ED were less likely to receive surgical (2925 patients [14.0%] vs 23 588 patients [24.3%]) or medication (1116 patients [5.4%] vs 10 878 patients [11.2%]) management. In the adjusted analysis, characteristics associated with decreased odds of active (surgical or medication) vs expectant management included ED (vs outpatient) presentation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.44-0.47), urban location (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91), and being a dependent on an insurance policy (vs primary policy holder) (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.74); whereas older age (aOR per 1-year increase 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.01), established prenatal care (aOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.29-2.42), and medical comorbidities (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) were associated with increased odds of receiving active management. Patients in the ED were more likely than those in outpatient clinics to need a blood transfusion (287 patients [1.4%] vs 202 patients [0.2%]) or hospitalization (463 patients [2.2%] vs 472 patients [0.5%]), but complications were low regardless of location of service. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of privately insured patients with EPL, differences in management between the ED vs outpatient setting may reflect barriers to accessing comprehensive EPL management options. More research is needed to understand these significant differences in management approaches by practice setting, and to what extent EPL management reflects patient preferences in both outpatient and ED settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsey S. Benson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Sarah K. Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Lisa S. Callegari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
- US Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services Research and Development, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
| | - Anne K. Chipman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Larry Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
| | - Vanessa K. Dalton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ahlschlager L, McCabe S, Deal AM, Guo A, Gessner KH, Lipman R, Chisolm S, Gore JL, Smith AB. The effect of treatment on work productivity in patients with bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2023:S1078-1439(23)00056-X. [PMID: 36990941 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the impact of bladder-preserving treatment vs. cystectomy on work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) among patients with bladder cancer. METHODS Using cross-sectional survey data, we constructed 2-part models involving both logistic and linear prediction to describe the relationship between WPAI and treatment modality among patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). RESULTS A total of 848 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with NMIBC who had cystectomy were more likely to experience activity impairment compared with those receiving bladder-preserving treatment (OR: 4.25, 95% CI: 2.28-7.93). Among patients with MIBC, cystectomy was protective against increasing presenteeism (e^β: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23-0.71) and productivity loss (e^β: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.88); however, the opposite effect was seen for absenteeism treatment (e^β: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.72-13.49). CONCLUSION Cystectomy increased the odds of experiencing activity impairment for patients with NMIBC. However, for patients with MIBC, cystectomy appears to be protective for presenteeism and productivity loss. Further work is needed in order to better understand these important relationships and improve both patient counseling and shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Ahlschlager
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Sean McCabe
- Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | - Kathryn H Gessner
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Apolo AB, Simon NI, Farrar M, Grewal S, Hepp Z, Mucha L, Michaels-Igbokwe C, Heidenreich S, Cutts K, Gore JL. Understanding drivers of treatment preferences in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A qualitative interview study with patients, caregivers, and physicians. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
492 Background: The development and selection of treatments for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) have historically focused on clinical outcomes while stakeholder preferences are often considered less frequently. To facilitate the consideration of various perspectives, this study explored factors that may influence preferences of patients, caregivers, and physicians around aspects of la/mUC treatments. Methods: Interview guides elicited perspectives on disease impact (symptoms, health-related quality of life [HRQOL], survival), therapy goals and unmet needs and were conducted with patients with la/mUC, their caregivers, and medical oncologists in the US. Qualitative semi-structured data were collected on symptoms, treatment expectations, and hypothetical treatments that required trade-offs between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer pain, and the risk of severe adverse events (SAEs). Participant’s willingness to accept AEs was also explored. Results: Thirty participants, including: 10 patients (mean age 58 years; 60% female, ineligible for cisplatin: 50%), 10 caregivers (mean age 50 years; 70% female), and 10 physicians (mean 17 years treating la/mUC; 30% female) were interviewed. The most frequently reported symptom at diagnosis was pain (patients 90%, caregivers 90%) and blood in urine (physicians 100%). All three groups reported emotional impacts with depression/sadness the most common. Patients (n=7) and caregivers (n=7) relied on physicians for decision-making but felt that alternative treatments were not discussed (patients: n=5; caregivers: n=3). All groups were willing to accept some level of risk of experiencing an AE, but the accepted risk of SAEs varied (patients: 0-50% risk of SAEs; caregivers: 5-100%; physicians: 3-30%). Physicians focused treatment discussions on AEs (n=8), and overall response rate (ORR; n=6), and rarely discussed survival (n=3). All three groups described PFS and treatment response as very or most relevant to them. In the hypothetical choice tasks, all would make trade-offs between OS, PFS, pain reduction and risk of SAEs; consistent with an approach that weighs benefits and risks in treatment selection. Conclusions: Patients likely may benefit from shared, informed decision-making to identify the most appropriate treatment option for them based on clinical outcomes, AEs, HRQOL, and pain control. All groups were willing to make benefit-risk trade-offs but preferences were heterogeneous. While this study included a relatively small number of patients, planned research informed by these results will expand and further identify which treatment attributes are most important to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea B. Apolo
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Nicholas I. Simon
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nyame YA, Holt SK, Etzioni RD, Gore JL. Racial inequities in the quality of surgical care among Medicare beneficiaries with localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2023; 129:1402-1410. [PMID: 36776124 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND US Black men are twice as likely to die from prostate cancer as men of other races. Lower quality care may contribute to this higher death rate. METHODS Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained for men in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-4N0/xM0/x) and managed primarily by radical prostatectomy (2005-2015). Surgical volume was determined for facility and surgeon. Relationships between race, surgeon and/or facility volume, and characteristics of treating facility with survival (all-cause and cancer-specific) were assessed using multivariable Cox regression and competing risk analysis. RESULTS Black men represented 6.7% (n = 2123) of 31,478 cohort. They were younger at diagnosis, had longer time from diagnosis to surgery, lower socioeconomic status, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and higher comorbid status compared with men of other races (p < .001). They were less likely to receive care from a surgeon or facility in the top volume percentile (p < .001); less likely to receive surgical care at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center and more likely seen at a minority-serving hospital; and less likely to travel ≥50 miles for surgical care. On multivariable analysis stratified by surgical volume, Black men receiving care from a surgeon or facility with lower volumes demonstrated increased risk of prostate cancer mortality (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.69) adjusting for age, clinical stage, PSA, and comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS Black Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer more commonly receive care from surgeons and facilities with lower volumes, likely affecting surgical quality and outcomes. Access to high-quality prostate cancer care may reduce racial inequities in disease outcomes, even among insured men. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Black men are twice as likely to die of prostate cancer than other US men. Lower quality care may contribute to higher rates of prostate cancer death. We used surgical volume to evaluate the relationship between race and quality of care. Black Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer more commonly received care from surgeons and facilities with lower volumes, correlating with a higher risk of prostate cancer death and indicating scarce resources for care. Access to high-quality prostate cancer care eases disparities in disease outcomes. Patient-centered interventions that increase access to high-quality care for Black men with prostate cancer are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ruth D Etzioni
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Filippou P, Hugar LA, Louwers R, Pomper A, Chisolm S, Smith AB, Gore JL, Gilbert SM. Palliative care knowledge, attitudes, and experiences amongst patients with bladder cancer and their caregivers. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:108.e1-108.e9. [PMID: 36529652 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Palliative care is underutilized amongst patients with bladder cancer despite guideline recommendations and known benefits. In order to uncover potential access barriers, we sought to describe patient and caregiver knowledge, attitudes and experiences surrounding palliative care. METHODS We surveyed 272 patients with bladder cancer and their caregivers through the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network. In addition to collecting demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics, previously studied and validated questionnaires on palliative care knowledge and beliefs were administered. Patients and caregivers were also queried regarding their experiences with palliative care consultation. RESULTS Survey respondents demonstrated highly accurate knowledge of palliative care services. Attitudes and beliefs surrounding palliative care were overall positive. Caregivers demonstrated better knowledge and more positive beliefs of palliative care compared to patients. Despite an overall positive sentiment toward palliative care, only 9% of the cohort had palliative care consultation as part of their cancer treatment plan. Most patients with muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer wished that palliative care had been discussed by their providers. CONCLUSIONS A subset of bladder cancer patients possess accurate knowledge and positive beliefs of palliative care. Palliative care is infrequently discussed during the treatment of bladder cancer, with patients and their caregivers expressing desire for palliative care to be discussed more often. Provider education surrounding palliative care services is imperative to improving access for bladder cancer patients and caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lee A Hugar
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa FL
| | - Renata Louwers
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ann Pomper
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa FL
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gore JL. COVID-19 Seminars Issue 2 - Introduction. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:69. [PMID: 34215508 PMCID: PMC8173458 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gross EE, Li M, Yin M, Orcutt D, Hussey D, Trott E, Holt SK, Dwyer ER, Kramer J, Oliva K, Gore JL, Schade GR, Lin DW, Tykodi SS, Hall ET, Thompson JA, Parikh A, Yang Y, Collier KA, Miah A, Mori-Vogt S, Hinkley M, Mortazavi A, Monk P, Folefac E, Clinton SK, Psutka SP. A multicenter study assessing survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with and without cytoreductive nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:51.e25-51.e31. [PMID: 36441070 PMCID: PMC10938342 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was called into question following the publication of the CARMENA trial. While previous retrospective studies have supported CN alongside targeted therapies, there is minimal research establishing its role in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between CN and oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2000 and 2020 who were treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and The Ohio State University and who were treated with ICI systemic therapy (ST) at any point in their disease course. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with mortality. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 367 patients (CN+ST n = 232, ST alone n = 135). Among patients undergoing CN, 30 were deferred. Median survivor follow-up was 28.4 months. ICI therapy was first-line in 28.1%, second-line in 17.4%, and third or subsequent line (3L+) in 54.5% of patients. Overall, patients who underwent CN+ST had longer median OS (56.3 months IQR 50.2-79.8) compared to the ST alone group (19.1 months IQR 12.8-23.8). Multivariable analyses demonstrated a 67% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality in patients who received CN+ST vs. ST alone (P < 0.0001). Similar results were noted when first-line ICI therapy recipients were examined as a subgroup. Upfront and deferred CN did not demonstrate significant differences in OS. CONCLUSIONS CN was independently associated with longer OS in patients with mRCC treated with ICI in any line of therapy. Our data support consideration of CN in well selected patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan E Gross
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Mingjia Li
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The James Cancer Hospital Columbus, OH
| | - Ming Yin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Delaney Orcutt
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Duncan Hussey
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Elliot Trott
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Erin R Dwyer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Joel Kramer
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Kaylee Oliva
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - George R Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Scott S Tykodi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan T Hall
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Anish Parikh
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The James Cancer Hospital Columbus, OH
| | - Yuanquan Yang
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The James Cancer Hospital Columbus, OH
| | - Katharine A Collier
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Abdul Miah
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Sherry Mori-Vogt
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Megan Hinkley
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - Amir Mortazavi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Paul Monk
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The James Cancer Hospital Columbus, OH
| | - Edmund Folefac
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Steven K Clinton
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Makrakis D, Wright JL, Roudier MP, Garcia J, Vakar-Lopez F, Porter MP, Wang Y, Dash A, Lin D, Schade G, Winters B, Zhang X, Nelson P, Mostaghel E, Cheng HH, Schweizer M, Holt SK, Gore JL, Yu EY, Lam HM, Montgomery B. A Phase 1/2 Study of Rapamycin and Cisplatin/Gemcitabine for Treatment of Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:265-272. [PMID: 36710146 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy is the standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), however, NAC confers only a small survival benefit and new strategies are needed to increase its efficacy. Pre-clinical data suggest that in response to DNA damage the tumor microenvironment (TME) adopts a paracrine secretory phenotype dependent on mTOR signaling which may provide an escape mechanism for tumor resistance, thus offering an opportunity to increase NAC effectiveness with mTOR blockade. PATIENTS & METHODS We conducted a phase I/II clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine-cisplatin-rapamycin combination. Grapefruit juice was administered to enhance rapamycin pharmacokinetics by inhibiting intestinal enzymatic degradation. Phase I was a dose determination/safety study followed by a single arm Phase II study of NAC prior to radical cystectomy evaluating pathologic response with a 26% pCR rate target. RESULTS In phase I, 6 patients enrolled, and the phase 2 dose of 35 mg rapamycin established. Fifteen patients enrolled in phase II; 13 were evaluable. Rapamycin was tolerated without serious adverse events. At the preplanned analysis, the complete response rate (23%) did not meet the prespecified level for continuing and the study was stopped due to futility. With immunohistochemistry, successful suppression of the mTOR signaling pathway in the tumor was achieved while limited mTOR activity was seen in the TME. CONCLUSION Adding rapamycin to gemcitabine-cisplatin therapy for patients with MIBC was well tolerated but failed to improve therapeutic efficacy despite evidence of mTOR blockade in tumor cells. Further efforts to understand the role of the tumor microenvironment in chemotherapy resistance is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Makrakis
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Jose Garcia
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Michael P Porter
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Atreya Dash
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Daniel Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - George Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Xiotun Zhang
- CellNetix Pathology and Laboratories LLC, Seattle, WA
| | - Peter Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Heather H Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael Schweizer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Hung Ming Lam
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ghali F, Zhao Y, Patel D, Jewell T, Yu EY, Grivas P, Montgomery RB, Gore JL, Etzioni RB, Wright JL. Surrogate Endpoints as Predictors of Overall Survival in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: A Trial-level Analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 47:58-64. [PMID: 36601043 PMCID: PMC9806712 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surrogate endpoints (SEs), such as progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), are frequently used in clinical trials. The relationship between SEs and overall survival (OS) has not been well described in metastatic urothelial cancer (MUC). Objective We evaluated trial-level data to assess the relationship between SEs and OS. We hypothesize a moderate surrogacy relationship between both PFS and ORR with OS. Design setting and participants We systematically reviewed phase 2/3 trials in MUC with two or more treatment arms, and report PFS and/or ORR, and OS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Linear regression was performed, and the coefficient of determination (R2) and surrogate threshold effect (STE) estimate were determined between PFS/ORR and OS. Results and limitations Of 3791 search results, 59 trials and 62 comparisons met the inclusion criteria. Of the 53 trials that reported PFS, 31 (58%) reported proportional hazard regression for PFS and OS. Linear regression across trials demonstrated an R2 of 0.60 between hazard ratio (HR) for PFS (HRPFS) and HR for OS (HROS), and an STE of 0.41. Linear regression of ΔPFS (median PFS in months of the treatment arm - that of the control arm) and ΔOS demonstrated an R2 of 0.12 and an STE of 14.1 mo. Thirty trials reported ORRs. Linear regression for ORRratio and HROS among all trials found an R2 of 0.08; an STE of 95% was not reached at any value and ΔORR and HROS similarly demonstrated a poor correlation with an R2 value of 0.03. Conclusions PFS provides only a moderate level of surrogacy for OS; An HRPFS of ≤0.41 provides 95% confidence of OS improvement. ORR is weakly correlated with OS and should be de-emphasized in MUC clinical trials. When PFS is discussed, proportional hazard regression should be reported. Patient summary We examined the relationship between surrogate endpoints, common outcomes in clinical trials, with survival in urothelial cancer trials. Progression-free survival is moderately correlated, while objective response rate had a poor correlation with survival and should be de-emphasized as a primary endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 318 10th Avenue E, Unit B7, Seattle, WA 98102, USA. Tel. +1 626 329 9705.
| | - Yibai Zhao
- Biostatistics Program, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Devin Patel
- The Urology Clinic of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Teresa Jewell
- Library Services, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - R. Bruce Montgomery
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ruth B. Etzioni
- Biostatistics Program, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Smith AD, Nikolaidis P, Khatri G, Chong ST, De Leon AD, Ganeshan D, Gore JL, Gupta RT, Kwun R, Lyshchik A, Nicola R, Purysko AS, Savage SJ, Taffel MT, Yoo DC, Delaney EW, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pyelonephritis: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S224-S239. [PMID: 36436954 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a severe urinary tract infection (UTI) that has the potential to cause sepsis, shock, and death. In the majority of patients, uncomplicated APN is diagnosed clinically and is responsive to treatment with appropriate antibiotics. In patients who are high risk or when treatment is delayed, microabscesses may coalesce to form an acute renal abscess. High-risk patients include those with a prior history of pyelonephritis, lack of response to therapy for lower UTI or for APN, diabetes, anatomic or congenital abnormalities of the urinary system, infections by treatment-resistant organisms, nosocomial infection, urolithiasis, renal obstruction, prior renal surgery, advanced age, pregnancy, renal transplant recipients, and immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients. Pregnant patients and patients with renal transplants on immunosuppression are at an elevated risk of severe complications. Imaging studies are often requested to aid with the diagnosis, identify precipitating factors, and differentiate lower UTI from renal parenchymal involvement, particularly in high-risk individuals. Imaging is usually not appropriate for the first-time presentation of suspected APN in an uncomplicated patient. The primary imaging modalities used in high-risk patients with suspected APN are CT, MRI, and ultrasound, although CT was usually not appropriate for initial imaging in a pregnant patient with no other complications. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Smith
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - Paul Nikolaidis
- Vice-Chair, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Chief, Division of Body MRI; Interim Chief, Division of Abdominal Imaging; Program Director, Body MRI Fellowship
| | - Suzanne T Chong
- Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; Committee on Emergency Radiology-General, Small, Emergency and/or Rural Practice
| | | | | | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Urological Association
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Richard Kwun
- Swedish Medical Center, Issaquah, Washington; American College of Emergency Physicians
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Refky Nicola
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, Buffalo, New York
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; ACR Learning Network, Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative, Physician Leader
| | - Stephen J Savage
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; American Urological Association; Professor and Vice Chairman of Urology
| | - Myles T Taffel
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York; Associate Section of Body Imaging
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Erin W Delaney
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; Primary care physician
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Chair UAB Department Appointments, Promotions, and Tenure Committee
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Snyder LE, Phan DF, Williams KC, Piqueiras E, Connor SE, George S, Kwan L, Villatoro Chavez J, Tandel MD, Frencher SK, Litwin MS, Gore JL, Hartzler AL. Comprehension, utility, and preferences of prostate cancer survivors for visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes co-designed for limited graph literacy: meters and emojis over comics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:1838-1846. [PMID: 36040190 PMCID: PMC9552288 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Visual timelines of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) can help prostate cancer survivors manage longitudinal data, compare with population averages, and consider future trajectories. PRO visualizations are most effective when designed with deliberate consideration of users. Yet, graph literacy is often overlooked as a design constraint, particularly when users with limited graph literacy are not engaged in their development. We conducted user testing to assess comprehension, utility, and preference of longitudinal PRO visualizations designed for prostate cancer survivors with limited literacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Building upon our prior work co-designing longitudinal PRO visualizations with survivors, we engaged 18 prostate cancer survivors in a user study to assess 4 prototypes: Meter, Words, Comic, and Emoji. During remote sessions, we collected data on prototype comprehension (gist and verbatim), utility, and preference. RESULTS Participants were aged 61-77 (M = 69), of whom half were African American. The majority of participants had less than a college degree (95%), had inadequate health literacy (78%), and low graph literacy (89%). Among the 4 prototypes, Meter had the best gist comprehension and was preferred. Emoji was also preferred, had the highest verbatim comprehension, and highest rated utility, including helpfulness, confidence, and satisfaction. Meter and Words both rated mid-range for utility, and Words scored lower than Emoji and Meter for comprehension. Comic had the poorest comprehension, lowest utility, and was least preferred. DISCUSSION Findings identify design considerations for PRO visualizations, contributing to the knowledge base for visualization best practices. We describe our process to meaningfully engage patients from diverse and hard-to-reach groups for remote user testing, an important endeavor for health equity in biomedical informatics. CONCLUSION Graph literacy is an important design consideration for PRO visualizations. Biomedical informatics researchers should be intentional in understanding user needs by involving diverse and representative individuals during development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Snyder
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Daniel F Phan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kristen C Williams
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eduardo Piqueiras
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sarah E Connor
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sheba George
- Department of Community Health Sciences, The Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Preventive & Social Medicine and the Center for Biomedical Informatics, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine & Science, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lorna Kwan
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Megha D Tandel
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stanley K Frencher
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mark S Litwin
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Community Health Sciences, The Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Health Policy & Management, The Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrea L Hartzler
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wong RL, Cheng HH, Fann JR, Hnida J, Chakoian M, Jannat S, Schenker Y, Yu EY, Gore JL. Depression screening and use of supportive care services in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
219 Background: Patients with prostate cancer (PC) have high rates of depression (15-20%), which is associated with worse oncologic outcomes. The PHQ-9 is commonly used in depression screening, but men with depression may present differently than women, and male-specific screening tools such as the Gotland Male Depression Scale (GMDS) have also been developed and validated. The use of supportive care services in men with PC and depression is not well-described. Methods: Men with ≥1 Urology or Medical Oncology clinic visit for PC in the prior 6 months were emailed the PHQ-9 and GMDS every 60 days. Men who screened positive (score ≥10 on PHQ-9 or ≥13 on GMDS, consistent with moderate to severe depression) were contacted by phone to discuss the positive screen; during that conversation patients were offered a referral to an oncology social worker for a formal needs assessment and connection to supportive care services. Patient characteristics and use of supportive care services (palliative care, psychiatry, counseling, support groups, or spiritual health) at baseline and as a result of study screening were collected by survey and chart review. Results: Between 6/2021-12/2021, 201 men enrolled (Table). 184 completed ≥2 screens with mean follow-up 6.5 months (SD 1.3). 31 men (15.4%) had ≥1 positive PHQ-9 screen and 11 (5.5%) had ≥1 positive GMDS screen, 9 of whom also screened positive on the PHQ-9. Of the 33 men offered clinical social work referrals based on PHQ-9 or GMDS screening, 12 (36%) initially accepted and 7 (21%) ultimately met with social work. Of these 7 men, two ultimately received ongoing supportive counseling from social work, two were referred to support groups or peers in the community, and one was referred to financial services; the remaining two men were not followed longitudinally or referred to any services by the social worker, but were given the option to re-contact the social worker as needed. For the two patients who screened positive on the GMDS but not the PHQ-9, one declined social work referral, and one initially accepted but never scheduled an appointment. Conclusions: Use of supportive care services in men with PC was low, including when services were actively offered as a result of depression screening. Beyond the PHQ-9, the GMDS did not identify any men who engaged in supportive care services. More work is needed to optimally identify men with PC who may benefit from supportive care services and barriers to use.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa Liang Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jesse R. Fann
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - James Hnida
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Samia Jannat
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Yael Schenker
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) and Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ackbarali T, Chisolm S, Gore JL, Meeks JJ, Shore ND. Using real-world patient experiences to inform point-of-care decisions and care management strategies in urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
280 Background: Approvals of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors hold the promise of improving long-term survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Competence gaps that were identified prompted the design of a unique educational series for the urology-oncology team. Optimal management of urothelial carcinoma relies on effective patient-provider communication and decision-making. To provide an integrative learning experience, the patient voice was embedded into the clinical content through shared insights and patient-reported data. Methods: A 4-part CME series was launched live-online in October 2021 in partnership with the Large Urology Group Practice Association and remains on-demand through October 2022 at UroCareLive.com and OMedLive.com. A companion patient program was held in September 2021 in partnership with the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network and remains on-demand at CancerCoachLive.com. Behavioral assessment of preferences and attitudes toward managing patients were examined throughout the CME series and patient/caregiver program. A planned analysis of the data from these questions will determine patient and clinical impact. Outcomes from the patient program were analyzed and presented during the CME series followed by expert-identified strategies to improve clinical practice. Results: To date, 775 clinicians and 15,193 patients have participated in the educational initiative. Of the patient-reported experiences and preferences: 44% prefer to discuss benefits and risks of treatment options; and while 85% prefer to make decisions with their team, 67% felt overwhelmed and ultimately allowed their team to select therapy. Patient insights revealed challenges related to quality of life, side-effect management, and disease management. Patient-provider disparities were observed across preferences for point-of-care treatment discussions and quality of life challenges. Clinical and patient impact following integration of the patient voice will be analyzed. Conclusions: The initiative contributed to the provision of valuable patient insights and preferences based on real-world experience which were integrated into provider education. Increasing this awareness fostered practical strategies and discussion to improve patient-centered care. Education incorporating the patient voice into provider education can further sensitize clinicians to patient concerns and facilitate point-of-care decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nyame YA, Cooperberg MR, Cumberbatch MG, Eggener SE, Etzioni R, Gomez SL, Haiman C, Huang F, Lee CT, Litwin MS, Lyratzopoulos G, Mohler JL, Murphy AB, Pettaway C, Powell IJ, Sasieni P, Schaeffer EM, Shariat SF, Gore JL. Deconstructing, Addressing, and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Prostate Cancer Care. Eur Urol 2022; 82:341-351. [PMID: 35367082 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Men of African ancestry have demonstrated markedly higher rates of prostate cancer mortality than men of other races and ethnicities around the world. In fact, the highest rates of prostate cancer mortality worldwide are found in the Caribbean and Sub-Saharan West Africa, and among men of African descent in the USA. Addressing this inequity in prostate cancer care and outcomes requires a focused research approach that creates durable solutions to address the structural, social, environmental, and health factors that create racial disparities in care and outcomes. OBJECTIVE To introduce a conceptual model for evaluating racial inequities in prostate cancer care to facilitate the development of translational research studies and interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A collaborative review of literature relevant to racial inequities in prostate cancer care and outcomes was performed. Existing literature was used to highlight various components of the conceptual model to inform future research and interventions toward equitable care and outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Racial inequities in prostate cancer outcomes are driven by a series of structural and social determinants of health that impact exposures, mediators, and outcomes. Social determinants of equity, such as laws/policies, economic systems, and structural racism, affect the inequitable access to environmental and neighborhood exposures, in addition to health care access. Although the incidence disparity remains problematic, various studies have demonstrated parity in outcomes when social and health factors, such as access to equitable care, are normalized. Few studies have tested interventions to reduce inequities in prostate cancer among Black men. CONCLUSIONS Worldwide, men of African ancestry demonstrate worse outcomes in prostate cancer, a phenomenon driven largely by social factors that inform biologic, environmental, and health care risks. A conceptual model was presented that organizes the many factors that influence prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Within that framework, we must understand the current state of inequities in clinical prostate cancer practice, the optimal state of what equitable practice would be, and how achieving equity in prostate cancer care balances costs, benefits, and harms. More robust characterization of the sources of prostate cancer inequities should inform testing of ambitious and innovative interventions as we work toward equity in care and outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Men of African ancestry demonstrate the highest rates of prostate cancer mortality, which may be reduced through social interventions. We present a framework for formalizing the identification of the drivers of prostate cancer inequities to facilitate the development of interventions and trials to eradicate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Scott E Eggener
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ruth Etzioni
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Genetic Epidemiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Franklin Huang
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark S Litwin
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - James L Mohler
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Curtis Pettaway
- Department of Urology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isaac J Powell
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Peter Sasieni
- Cancer Research UK & King's College London Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kirk PS, Wang A, Raskolnikov D, Psutka SP, Gore JL, Nyame YA, Kelly J, Wright JL. Naloxegol versus Alvimopan for Enhancing Postoperative Recovery following Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Urol Pract 2022; 9:364-370. [PMID: 37145718 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION µ-Opioid-receptor antagonists are a standard component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways following radical cystectomy (RC) as they reduce ileus and shorten length of stay (LOS). Prior studies have used alvimopan; however, naloxegol is a less expensive medication in the same class. We compared differences in postoperative outcomes between patients receiving alvimopan or naloxegol following RC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing RC over 20 months at an academic center during which standard practice transitioned from using alvimopan to naloxegol, while maintaining all other components of our ERAS pathway. We utilized bivariate comparisons as well as negative binomial and logistic regression to compare return of bowel function, rates of ileus and LOS following RC. RESULTS Of 117 eligible patients, 59 (50%) received alvimopan and 58 (50%) received naloxegol. There were no differences in baseline clinical, demographic or perioperative factors. Median postoperative LOS was 6 days in each group (p=0.3). Time to flatus (2 versus 2 days, p=0.2) and ileus (14% versus 17%, p=0.6) were similar between the alvimopan and naloxegol groups, respectively. In multivariable models controlling for patient and surgical factors, µ-opioid antagonist agent was associated with neither LOS nor ileus. Cost difference was -$344.20/day, equivalent to a $2,065.20 savings over a 6-day hospital stay with naloxegol. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing RC managed with a standard ERAS pathway, there were no differences in postoperative recovery based on the use of alvimopan versus naloxegol. Substitution of naloxegol for alvimopan may allow for significant cost savings without compromising outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Kirk
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Austin Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dima Raskolnikov
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Janet Kelly
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Downing J, Holt SK, Cunetta M, Gore JL, Dy GW. Spending and Out-of-Pocket Costs for Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery in the US. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:799-806. [PMID: 35793109 PMCID: PMC9260638 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is safe and offers substantial benefits to patients. Geographic accessibility and high out-of-pocket (OOP) costs reportedly hinder access; however, to date, this has not been thoroughly investigated at the national level. Objective To estimate OOP and total costs for GAS among commercially insured beneficiaries and assess whether costs differed between surgical procedures conducted in and outside the patient's state of residence. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used previously collected insurance data from the MarketScan Commercial Database (129 million patients) from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019. Vaginoplasties and phalloplasties were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes among patients aged 18 to 64 years. Out-of-state surgical procedures were identified based on residence at enrollment and place of service of the surgery. Data analysis took place from July 1 to September 31, 2021. Exposures Vaginoplasty and phalloplasty. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were differences in OOP and total costs by out-of-state designation, census region, age, and insurance type for surgical procedures, estimated using multivariable linear regression models. Results The study included 771 patients who underwent GAS. A total of 609 underwent vaginoplasty, of whom 249 (41%) underwent surgery in their state of residence (mean [SD] age, 38.7 [13.1] years) and 340 (56%) underwent surgery outside their state (mean [SD] age, 38.1 [13.0] years), and 162 underwent phalloplasty, of whom 66 (41%) underwent surgery in their state of residence (mean [SD] age, of 39.7 [11.6] years) and 81 (50%) underwent surgery outside their state (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [10.9] years); 20 vaginoplasties (3%) and 15 phalloplasties (9%) could not be classified as in or out of state owing to missing data about the facility or residence. Procedures outside the state were associated with 49% (95% CI, 19%-85%) higher OOP costs compared with procedures done in the state of residence. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, 56% of patients who underwent vaginoplasty and 50% of patients who underwent phalloplasty underwent the procedure outside their state of residence. Patients who underwent these procedures outside their state also experienced higher OOP costs than did those who underwent these procedures in their state. Improving geographic access and understanding patient preferences for surgical care may help reduce the cost burden for those planning to undergo GAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Downing
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Sarah K. Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Geolani W. Dy
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wong RL, Cheng HH, Fann JR, Hnida J, Chakoian M, Schenker Y, Yu EY, Gore JL. Longitudinal screening for depression and anxiety in prostate cancer (PC) and association with disease and treatment factors. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5023 Background: Untreated depression and anxiety are associated with worse outcomes in patients with cancer. Despite recommendations for longitudinal screening, many patients are only assessed at the start of care. Men with PC often experience many phases of disease or treatment over a span of years, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with mood changes and depression. How depressive or anxiety symptoms fluctuate in men with PC, influenced by disease and treatment factors, is not well-described. Methods: Men with ≥1 Urology or Medical Oncology clinic visit for PC in the prior 6 months were emailed the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 depression and anxiety screening tools every 60 days; a score of ≥10 (moderate to severe symptoms) on either was considered a positive screen. Baseline characteristics and disease/treatment changes (PSA, radiographic, or biopsy progression, treatment change or start, or discontinuation of treatment due to lack of efficacy or toxicity) were collected by survey and chart review. We report early findings of factors associated with a positive screen or change in screening status with χ2 and forward stepwise binary logistic regression (model inputs: receipt of ADT or disease/treatment change during study, and variables previously associated with depression or anxiety: age, race, marital status, education, income, history of psychiatric disorder, use of psychoactive medication, time since diagnosis, and localized, biochemically recurrent, or metastatic disease). Results: From 6/2021-12/2021, 201 men enrolled. At baseline, 50.7% had localized, 18.9% biochemically recurrent, and 30.3% metastatic disease; 40.8% were on ADT; 30.8% had a history of psychiatric disorder (22.9% depression, 19.9% anxiety, 9.0% other); and 24.9% were on psychoactive medication (19.9% antidepressant, 8.5% anxiolytic, 2.0% antipsychotic). 184 men completed at least 2 screens with mean follow-up 6.5 months (SD 1.3). 32 men (15.9%) screened positive at least once (15.4% PHQ-9, 4.5% GAD-7), of which half (N = 16) initially screened negative and later positive. Changing from a negative to positive screen was more likely when a disease/treatment change occurred during the study (18.3% vs 4.5%, p = 0.003). A higher proportion of men on ADT screened positive, especially if newly started during the study or in the 60 days preceding (35.7% new ADT vs 24.7% continuing ADT vs 8.0% no ADT, p = 0.002). In fully adjusted multivariable analyses, factors associated with a positive screen were history of psychiatric disorder (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.6-15.4, p < 0.001), receipt of ADT (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.5, p = 0.005), and lower income bracket (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.5, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Longitudinal screening for depression and anxiety in PC identifies men who initially screen negative. Symptoms are associated with ADT and disease or treatment changes, which may inform optimal screening practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa Liang Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Jesse R. Fann
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Marty Chakoian
- Us TOO International Prostate Cancer Education and Support Network, Des Plaines, IL
| | - Yael Schenker
- Palliative Research Center (PaRC) and Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Purysko AS, Nikolaidis P, Khatri G, Auron M, De Leon AD, Ganeshan D, Gore JL, Gupta RT, Shek-Man Lo S, Lyshchik A, Savage SJ, Smith AD, Taffel MT, Yoo DC, Lockhart ME. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-Treatment Follow-up and Active Surveillance of Clinically Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S156-S174. [PMID: 35550799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for most malignant renal tumors and is considered the most lethal of all urologic cancers. For follow-up of patients with treated or untreated RCC and those with neoplasms suspected to represent RCC, radiologic imaging is the most valuable component of surveillance, as most relapses and cases of disease progression are identified when patients are asymptomatic. Understanding the strengths and limitations of the various imaging modalities for the detection of disease, recurrence, or progression is essential when planning follow-up regimens. This document addresses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients who have been treated for RCC with radical or partial nephrectomy or ablative therapies. It also discusses the appropriate imaging examinations for asymptomatic patients with localized biopsy-proven or suspected RCC undergoing active surveillance. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul Nikolaidis
- Panel Chair, Vice Chair, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Panel Vice-Chair, Division Chief, Body MRI; Associate Division Chief, Abdominal Imaging; Program Director, Body MRI Fellowship, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Moises Auron
- Medical Director Blood Management; Quality and Patient Safety Officer, Department of Hospital Medicine; Member, Board of Governors, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Primary care physician-Internal medicine
| | | | | | - John L Gore
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; American Urological Association
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Chair, ACR Meetings Subcommittee, Commission on Publications and Lifelong Learning
| | - Simon Shek-Man Lo
- Vice Chair for Strategic Planning, Director of SBRT, and Co-chair of Appointment and Promotion Committee of Department of Radiation of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; and Immediate Past President of CARROS of ACR, Fellowship Committee Chair of CARROS of ACR, ACR Assistant Councilor (on behalf of American Radium Society), Chair of the Committee for ACR Practice Parameter for Radiation Oncology
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Savage
- Professor and Vice Chairman of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; American Urological Association
| | - Andrew D Smith
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Myles T Taffel
- Associate Section Head Abdominal Imaging, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Don C Yoo
- Rhode Island Hospital/The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- Specialty Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and Chair, ACR Appropriateness Committee
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Singh Z, Holt SK, Gore JL, Nyame YA, Wright JL, Schade GR. Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Presentation Following Solid Organ Transplantation. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 39:79-82. [PMID: 35445202 PMCID: PMC9014382 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients are often subject to intense screening regimens that can potentially delay transplantation and cause unnecessary harm. Although initial studies suggested that SOT recipients had elevated risk of prostate cancer (PCa), contemporary studies have shown that transplant recipients with low- or intermediate-risk PCa have similar outcomes to their counterparts without a transplant. However, there are limited data on the relationship between prior transplant exposure and the risk of clinically significant aggressive PCa at presentation. To provide additional insight, we queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database to establish a cohort of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-screened transplant patients who then went on to develop PCa. Procedure and diagnosis codes were then used to identify patients with a history of SOT. Aggressive PCa phenotype was defined as death from PCa or de novo metastasis, regional lymph node metastasis, PSA >20 ng/l, or Gleason score 8–10 at presentation. On univariable and multivariable (adjusted for age and race) analyses, transplant patients (n = 292) were not at significantly higher risk of an aggressive prostate cancer phenotype with odds ratios of 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.72–1.25) and 1.18, (95% confidence interval 0.90–1.57), respectively. The results suggest that transplant recipients can have similar screening protocols to those for the general population. Patient summary Using database results for transplant recipients, we investigated their risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer after transplantation. We found that having a transplant did not increase the risk of aggressive prostate cancer. This work suggests that transplant recipients are unlikely to benefit from more rigorous screening protocols than those for the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorawar Singh
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Urology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Sarah K. Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yaw A. Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George R. Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Corresponding author at: Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Tel. +1 206 7973722.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rammant E, Leung TM, Gore JL, Berry D, Given B, Lee CT, Quale D, Mohamed NE. Associations of self-efficacy, social support and coping strategies with health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13571. [PMID: 35304799 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Investigating associations between self-efficacy, social support and quality of life (HRQoL) and mediating effects of coping among bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2014 with 99 BC patients. An online survey assessed patient characteristics, HRQoL, coping strategies, self-efficacy and social support. A stepwise multiple linear regression model was used. RESULTS Self-efficacy and social support were significantly associated with HRQoL. Complete mediation effects of adaptive/maladaptive coping strategies emerged for the associations between self-efficacy and social support with functional well-being (B = 0.247, 95% CI 0.119-0.374, p < 0.001; B = -0.414, 95% CI -0.526 to -0.302, p < 0.001) and total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BI) (B = 0.779, 95% CI 0.351-1.207, p < 0.001; B = -1.969, 95% CI -2.344 to -1.594, p < 0.001). Maladaptive coping mediated the associations of self-efficacy and social support with physical well-being (B = -0.667, 95% CI -0.752 to -0.516, p < 0.001) and disease-specific symptoms (B = -0.413, 95% CI -0.521 to -0.304, p < 0.001). A partial mediation effect of adaptive coping was found for the association between self-efficacy and social well-being (B = 0.145, 95% CI 0.016-0.273, p < 0.05). Social support was significantly associated with emotional (B = 0.067, 95% CI 0.027-0.108, p < 0.001) and social well-being (B = 0.200, 95% CI 0.146-0.255, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Interventions should tackle self-efficacy, social support and coping strategies to improve BC patients' HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tung Ming Leung
- Department of Urology and Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Donna Berry
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Barbara Given
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diane Quale
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nihal E Mohamed
- Department of Urology and Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Greer MD, Schaub SK, Bowen SR, Liao JJ, Russell K, Chen JJ, Weg ES, Meyer J, Alving T, Schade GR, Gore JL, Psutka SP, Montgomery RB, Schweizer M, Yu EY, Grivas P, Wright JL, Zeng J. A Prospective Study of a Resorbable Intravesical Fiducial Marker for Bladder Cancer Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100858. [PMID: 35387424 PMCID: PMC8977855 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We conducted a prospective pilot study to evaluate safety and feasibility of TraceIT, a resorbable radiopaque hydrogel, to improve image guidance for bladder cancer radiation therapy (RT). Methods and Materials Patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer receiving definitive RT were eligible. TraceIT was injected intravesically around the tumor bed during maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor. The primary endpoint was the difference between radiation treatment planning margin on daily cone beam computed tomography based on alignment to TraceIT versus standard-of-care pelvic bone anatomy. The Van Herk margin formula was used to determine the optimal planning target volume margin. TraceIT visibility, recurrence rates, and survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Results The trial was fully accrued and 15 patients were analyzed. TraceIT was injected in 4 sites/patient (range, 4-6). Overall, 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-98%) of injection sites were radiographically visible at RT initiation versus 71% (95% CI, 62%-81%) at RT completion. The median duration of radiographic visibility for injection sites was 106 days (95% CI, 104-113). Most patients were treated with a standard split-course approach with initial pelvic radiation fields, then midcourse repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by bladder tumor bed boost fields, and 14/15 received concurrent chemotherapy. Alignment to fiducials could allow for reduced planning target volume margins (0.67 vs 1.56 cm) for the initial phase of RT, but not for the boost (1.01 vs 0.96 cm). This allowed for improved target coverage (D95% 80%-83% to 91%-94%) for 2 patients retrospectively planned with both volumetric-modulated arc therapy and 3-dimensional conformal RT. At median follow-up of 22 months, no acute or late complications attributable to TraceIT placement occurred. No patients required salvage cystectomy. Conclusions TraceIT intravesical fiducial placement is safe and feasible and may facilitate tumor bed delineation and targeting in patients undergoing RT for localized muscle invasive bladder cancer. Improved image guided treatment may facilitate strategies to improve local control and minimize toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stephen R. Bowen
- Radiation Oncology and
- Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tristan Alving
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - George R. Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah P. Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert B. Montgomery
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael Schweizer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Jing Zeng
- Radiation Oncology and
- Corresponding author: Jing Zeng, MD
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sangameswaran S, Segal C, Rosenberg DE, Casanova-Perez R, Cronkite D, Gore JL, Hartzler AL. Design of digital walking programs that engage prostate cancer survivors: Needs and preferences from focus groups. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2022; 2021:1069-1078. [PMID: 35309011 PMCID: PMC8861760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The majority of prostate cancer survivors do not meet physical activity (PA) recommendations. Although technology has shown to promote PA, engagement has been a challenge. This mixed method study characterizes survivors' needs and preferences for digital walking programs Through focus groups and surveys, we engaged prostate cancer support groups to describe PA motivators and barriers, interest in improving PA, and preferences for design features of a future digital walking program. Identified motivators (peers, positive thinking) and barriers (health issues) reflect PA needs that impact engagement. The most preferred features include: (1) well-curated, specific content, (2) individualized feedback from trusted sources, (3) moderated peer discussion, and (4) support from small teams and peer mentors. These findings inform digital PA programs that survivors will find engaging and can promote PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dori E Rosenberg
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle, WA
| | | | - David Cronkite
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle, WA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Maldonado R, Fintelmann FJ, Marquardt JP, O'Malley RB, Holt SK, Ngo S, Diamantopoulos LN, Laidlaw G, Schade GR, Lin DW, Wright JL, Gore JL, Nyame YA, Grivas P, Yu EY, Montgomery RB, Hsieh AC, Yezefski T, Schweizer MT, Psutka SP. Changes in body composition during neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy associations prior to radical cystectomy: Implications for chemotherapy-associated adverse events and oncologic outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
476 Background: Low skeletal muscle index (SMI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and chemotherapy-related adverse events (AE) across numerous other malignancies. Small case series suggest neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with a significant decline in SMI in patients with MIBC. However, limited data exists regarding changes in fat mass during NAC. Herein, we examine changes in SMI, visceral fat index (VFI), and subcutaneous fat index (SFI) in patients receiving NAC for MIBC before radical cystectomy (RC). We describe associations between body composition changes and NAC-associated AE and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with MIBC. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with MIBC (≥pT2 N0/x/1 M0) who received NAC (2006-2019). Patients with digitized abdominal computed tomography scans (CT) within 75 days prior (T1) and 75 days following completion (T2) of NAC were included. We segmented and calculated the indices (cm2/m2) for SMI, VFI, and SFI at the third lumbar vertebra level at T1 and T2 using validated methodology. Associations with AE during NAC and ACM were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Included 170 patients, median age 63 years receiving a median of 4 (IQR 3-5) cycles of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (52%), MVAC (28%), or other NAC (20%). Absolute and relative changes in SMI, VFI, and SFI over a median of 112 days (IQR 94-146) between measurements are presented in the Table. 117 (69%) patients experienced grade ≥3 chemotherapy-related AE. No associations between baseline body composition or change in body composition during NAC with chemotherapy-related AE. T1 SMI (HR: 0.98; 0.97-0.99, p = 0.008), as well as T2 SMI (HR: 0.98; 0.96-0.99, p = 0.003), T2 VFI (HR: 0.99; 0.99-1.0, p = 0.05) and T2 SFI (HR: 0.99; 0.98-1.0, P = 0.03) were associated with ACM after adjusting for age, clinical T and N stage, and performance status. Conclusions: Patients undergoing NAC prior to RC experienced a 6.4% decrease in SMI and a 5.2% decrease in VFI during an average of 112 days. Chemotherapy-related AE were not associated with a change in body composition. Baseline SMI and T2 SMI, SFI, and VFI were associated with ACM on multivariable analysis. Future work is needed to understand the mechanisms underpinning such changes and the extent to which potentially detrimental changes in body composition may be mitigated before surgery.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Yaw A. Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Psutka SP, Gore JL, Holt SK, Dwyer E, Schade G, Grivas P, Hsieh AC, Lee JK, Montgomery RB, Schweizer MT, Yezefski T, Yu EY, Chen JJ, Liao JJ, Weg ES, Zeng J, Alving T, Jannat S, Wright JL. Prospective evaluation of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in multidisciplinary bladder cancer care: Feasibility and impact on decisional conflict. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
479 Background: Commonly utilized risk stratification tools demonstrate inconsistent associations with salient clinical outcomes in bladder cancer leading to a disproportionate reliance on providers’ subjective impression of a patient’s fitness for therapy. Current guidelines advocate for use of a CGA to quantify vulnerabilities in older ( > 65 years) patients before treatment selection. Our objective was to prospectively evaluate CGA in our Bladder Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic (BCMC). We hypothesized that CGA implementation would be feasible and that discussion of the results during shared decision-making would be associated with reduced patient-reported decisional conflict. Methods: Patients seen in BCMC were prospectively enrolled from 6/1/20 to 7/20/21. In the first 3 months, participants underwent non-standardized risk stratification (“Routine cohort”, N = 27). Between 9/1/20 and 7/20/21, participants completed a CGA incorporating validated assessments of frailty, functional status, multimorbidity, nutrition, cognition, and mental health (“CGA cohort”, N = 67). Results were shared with patients during BCMC visits. All patients and providers (three physicians per clinic from: Uro-Oncology, Medical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology) completed a follow-up survey including the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Time required to complete the CGA, completion rates, and patient-reported burden were assessed. Concordance of patient- and provider-reported decisional conflict was compared between Routine and CGA cohorts. Results: Of 138 eligible patients, 94 patients were successfully enrolled (68%) with median age of 72 years, ECOG PS ≥3 in 13%, and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3 in 18%, of whom 18% were women. Most patients had pT2 bladder cancer (87%; cN+ and M1 in 23.4% and 9.6%, respectively). CGA component completion rates were 79-100%. Survey response rates were high (patients: 77%, providers: 86%), and most (86%) patients felt that the CGA was, at most, minimally burdensome. Vulnerabilities detected across CGA domains triggered relevant referrals. Patient-reported median (IQR) DCS scores were numerically higher (e.g. greater decisional conflict) for the CGA cohort: (27 [14-33] vs 16 [2-30] for Routine patients, p = 0.28). Provider- and provider reported DCS score was correlated in the CGA (p = 0.04), but not the Routine cohort (p = 0.07). Conclusions: We prospectively evaluated use of CGAs in bladder cancer care and found that CGAs were successfully implemented with high rates of completion and low rates of perceived burden. Notably, in this pilot cohort of 94 patients, DCS scores did not differ significantly between patients and providers with CGA use. Future work will evaluate associations between individual instruments, treatment decisions, clinical outcomes and patient-reported quality of life measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jing Zeng
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Black PC, Alimohamed N, Kassouf W, Gore JL, McCoy KD, Nelson BH, De Carvalho DD, Ouellette RJ, Devins F, Cornacchia T, Siemens DR, Berman DM, Sridhar SS, Kulkarni G. Building the Canadian Bladder Cancer Research Network (CBCRN): Progress During a Pandemic. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:E307-E314. [DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
49
|
Kirk PS, Zhu K, Zheng Y, Newcomb LF, Schenk JM, Brooks JD, Carroll PR, Dash A, Ellis WJ, Filson CP, Gleave ME, Liss M, Martin F, McKenney JK, Morgan TM, Nelson PS, Thompson IM, Wagner AA, Lin DW, Gore JL. Treatment in the absence of disease reclassification among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Cancer 2022; 128:269-274. [PMID: 34516660 PMCID: PMC8738121 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining men on active surveillance for prostate cancer can be challenging. Although most men who eventually undergo treatment have experienced clinical progression, a smaller subset elects treatment in the absence of disease reclassification. This study sought to understand factors associated with treatment in a large, contemporary, prospective cohort. METHODS This study identified 1789 men in the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study cohort enrolled as of 2020 with a median follow-up of 5.6 years. Clinical and demographic data as well as information on patient-reported quality of life and urinary symptoms were used in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify factors associated with the time to treatment RESULTS: Within 4 years of their diagnosis, 33% of men (95% confidence interval [CI], 30%-35%) underwent treatment, and 10% (95% CI, 9%-12%) were treated in the absence of reclassification. The most significant factor associated with any treatment was an increasing Gleason grade group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 14.5; 95% CI, 11.7-17.9). Urinary quality-of-life scores were associated with treatment without reclassification (aHR comparing "mostly dissatisfied/terrible" with "pleased/mixed," 2.65; 95% CI, 1.54-4.59). In a subset analysis (n = 692), married men, compared with single men, were more likely to undergo treatment in the absence of reclassification (aHR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.04-6.66). CONCLUSIONS A substantial number of men with prostate cancer undergo treatment in the absence of clinical changes in their cancers, and quality-of-life changes and marital status may be important factors in these decisions. LAY SUMMARY This analysis of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer shows that approximately 1 in 10 men will decide to be treated within 4 years of their diagnosis even if their cancer is stable. These choices may be related in part to quality-or-life or spousal concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S. Kirk
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Kehao Zhu
- Biostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Biostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jeannette M. Schenk
- Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Atreya Dash
- VA Puget Sound Health Care Systems, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Martin E. Gleave
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Michael Liss
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Frances Martin
- Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia Beach, VA
| | - Jesse K. McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Peter S. Nelson
- Division of Human Biology and Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Andrew A. Wagner
- Division of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, Alva A, Baine M, Beckermann K, Carlo MI, Choueiri TK, Costello BA, Derweesh IH, Desai A, Ged Y, George S, Gore JL, Haas N, Hancock SL, Kapur P, Kyriakopoulos C, Lam ET, Lara PN, Lau C, Lewis B, Madoff DC, Manley B, Michaelson MD, Mortazavi A, Nandagopal L, Plimack ER, Ponsky L, Ramalingam S, Shuch B, Smith ZL, Sosman J, Dwyer MA, Gurski LA, Motter A. Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:71-90. [PMID: 34991070 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 99.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC typically undergo surgery and/or receive systemic therapy. Tumor histology and risk stratification of patients is important in therapy selection. The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer stratify treatment recommendations by histology; recommendations for first-line treatment of ccRCC are also stratified by risk group. To further guide management of advanced RCC, the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel has categorized all systemic kidney cancer therapy regimens as "Preferred," "Other Recommended Regimens," or "Useful in Certain Circumstances." This categorization provides guidance on treatment selection by considering the efficacy, safety, evidence, and other factors that play a role in treatment selection. These factors include pre-existing comorbidities, nature of the disease, and in some cases consideration of access to agents. This article summarizes surgical and systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Jonasch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Ajjai Alva
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Arpita Desai
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Yasser Ged
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | - John L Gore
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - Naomi Haas
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Payal Kapur
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amir Mortazavi
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Lee Ponsky
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/ University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Zachary L Smith
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes- Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Jeffrey Sosman
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|