1
|
Sanyal C, Ragavan MV. Beyond the PSA: The hidden costs of screening in prostate cancer. Cancer 2024; 130:3272-3274. [PMID: 39012908 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
The diagnostic workup following a positive prostate‐specific antigen test may lead to significant out‐of‐pocket costs for patients. Providers should incorporate costs into shared decision‐making with patients; in parallel, policymakers and payers must identify solutions to mitigate financial burdens that risk widening existing disparities in prostate cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiranjeev Sanyal
- College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Meera V Ragavan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson-Buettner AS, Janitz AE, Doescher MP, Madison SD, Khoussine MA, Harjo KL, Bear MB, Dartez S, Buckner SK, Rhoades DA. Financial hardship screening among Native American patients with cancer: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:928. [PMID: 39138428 PMCID: PMC11323667 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11357-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related financial hardship is an increasingly recognized concern for patients, families, and caregivers. Many Native American (NA) patients are at increased risk for cancer-related financial hardship due to high prevalence of low income, medical comorbidity, and lack of private health insurance. However, financial hardship screening (FHS) implementation for NA patients with cancer has not been reported. The objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to FHS implementation for NA patients. METHODS We conducted key informant interviews with NA patients with cancer and with clinical staff at an academic cancer center. Included patients had a confirmed diagnosis of cancer and were referred to the cancer center through the Indian Health Service, Tribal health program, or Urban Indian health program. Interviews included questions regarding current financial hardship, experiences in discussing financial hardship with the cancer care and primary care teams, and acceptability of completing a financial hardship screening tool at the cancer center. Clinical staff included physicians, advanced practice providers, and social workers. Interviews focused on confidence, comfort, and experience in discussing financial hardship with patients. Recorded interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed using MAXQDA® software. RESULTS We interviewed seven patients and four clinical staff. Themes from the interviews included: 1) existing resources and support services; 2) challenges, gaps in services, and barriers to care; 3) nuances of NA cancer care; and 4) opportunities for improved care and resources. Patients identified financial challenges to receiving cancer care including transportation, lodging, food insecurity, and utility expenses. Patients were willing to complete a FHS tool, but indicated this tool should be short and not intrusive of the patient's financial information. Clinical staff described discomfort in discussing financial hardship with patients, primarily due to a lack of training and knowledge about resources to support patients. Having designated staff familiar with I/T/U systems was helpful, but perspectives differed regarding who should administer FHS. CONCLUSIONS We identified facilitators and barriers to implementing FHS for NA patients with cancer at both the patient and clinician levels. Findings suggest clear organizational structures and processes are needed for financial hardship to be addressed effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber S Anderson-Buettner
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Amanda E Janitz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Mark P Doescher
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Stefanie D Madison
- Oklahoma City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Keri L Harjo
- Oklahoma City Indian Clinic, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Marvin B Bear
- Little Axe Health Center, Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Stephnie Dartez
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Sheryl K Buckner
- Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Dorothy A Rhoades
- Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Misplon S, Marneffe W, Missiaen J, Myny D, Decock I, Lervant S, Vaneygen K. Onco@home: comparing the costs and reimbursement of cancer treatment at home with the standard of care. Arch Public Health 2024; 82:95. [PMID: 38915071 PMCID: PMC11194927 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01317-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncological home hospitalization (HH) was implemented in a Belgian context to evaluate the feasibility of oncological HH. In a first HH model (HH1), implemented by three Belgian hospitals, two home nursing organizations and a grouping of independent nurses, the blood draw and monitoring prior to intravenous therapy was performed by a trained home nurse at the patient's home the day before the visit to the day hospital. In a second HH model (HH2), implemented in one hospital, the administration of two subcutaneous treatments (Azacitidine and Bortezomib) for myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma were provided at home instead of in the hospital. A previous study on this pilot showed that oncological HH is feasible and safe and improves the Quality of Life. The aim of this study is to investigate the cost and reimbursement of cancer treatment in these two HH models compared to the Standard of Care (SOC). METHODS A bottom-up micro-costing study was conducted to compare the costs and revenues for the providers (hospitals and home care organizations) of the SOC and the HH models. RESULTS Costs associated to HH were higher than the SOC in the hospital. Comparing revenues with costs, the research revealed that the reimbursement from the National Health Insurance of HH for oncological patients is insufficient. In HH1, costs were higher than in the SOC (+ €50.4). There was a reduction in costs in the hospital by moving the blood draw to the home setting (-€23.9), but the costs in home care were higher (+ €74.3). The extra revenues in home care (+ €33.6) were insufficient to cover the costs. The cost difference between the SOC and HH2 (+ €9.5 for Azacetidine) was smaller than in HH1. But, there was almost no funding for subcutaneous administration in home care. If the product is administered in a day hospital, the hospital receives a revenue of €124 per administration, while in home care the funding is €5 per visit. CONCLUSION Costs of HH are higher and the reimbursement from Belgian NHI is insufficient to organize HH. As a result, HH for oncology patient is still limited in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Misplon
- Faculty of Business Economics, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Wim Marneffe
- Faculty of Business Economics, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Dries Myny
- OLV Lourdes, Waregem, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinzer H, Lee CN, Cooksey K, Myckatyn T, Olsen MA, Foraker R, Johnson AR, Politi MC. Financial Toxicity Considerations in Breast Reconstruction: Recommendations for Research and Practice. Womens Health Issues 2024; 34:107-114. [PMID: 38413293 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kinzer
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Clara N Lee
- University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Krista Cooksey
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Terence Myckatyn
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Margaret A Olsen
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Randi Foraker
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna Rose Johnson
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mary C Politi
- Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nabukalu D, Gordon LG, Lowe J, Merollini KMD. Healthcare costs of cancer among children, adolescents, and young adults: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6925. [PMID: 38214042 PMCID: PMC10905233 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To collate and critically review international evidence on the direct health system costs of children and adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer. METHODS We conducted searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus. Articles were limited to studies involving people aged 0-39 years at cancer diagnosis and published from 2012 to 2022. Two reviewers screened the articles and evaluated the studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. The reviewers synthesized the findings using a narrative approach and presented the costs in 2022 US dollars for comparability. RESULTS Overall, the mean healthcare costs for all cancers in the 5 years post diagnosis ranged from US$36,670 among children in Korea to US$127,946 among AYA in the USA. During the first year, the mean costs among children 0-14 years ranged from US$34,953 in Chile to over US$130,000 in Canada. These were higher than the costs for AYA, estimated at US$61,855 in Canada. At the end of life, the mean costs were estimated at over US$300,000 among children and US$235,265 among adolescents in Canada. Leukemia was the most expensive cancer type, estimated at US$50,133 in Chile, to US$152,533 among children in Canada. Overall, more than a third of the total cost is related to hospitalizations. All the included studies were of good quality. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare costs associated with cancer are substantial among children, and AYA. More research is needed on the cost of cancer in low- and middle-income countries and harmonization of costs across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen Nabukalu
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- Population Health ProgramQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteHerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - Louisa G. Gordon
- Population Health ProgramQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteHerstonQueenslandAustralia
- School of NursingQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveQueenslandAustralia
- School of Public HealthThe University of QueenslandHerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - John Lowe
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
| | - Katharina M. D. Merollini
- School of HealthUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsQueenslandAustralia
- Sunshine Coast Health InstituteSunshine Coast University HospitalBirtinyaQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Odom JN, Young HM, Sterba K, Sannes TS, Reinhard S, Nightingale C, Meier D, Gray TF, Ferrell B, Fernandez ME, Donovan H, Curry K, Currie ER, Bryant T, Bakitas MA, Applebaum AJ. Developing a national implementation strategy to accelerate uptake of evidence-based family caregiver support in U.S. cancer centers. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6221. [PMID: 37743780 PMCID: PMC10896495 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize key factors and training needs of U.S. cancer centers in implementing family caregiver support services. METHODS Sequential explanatory mixed methods design consisting of: (1) a national survey of clinicians and administrators from Commission-on-Cancer-accredited cancer centers (N = 238) on factors and training needed for establishing new caregiver programs and (2) qualitative interviews with a subsample of survey respondents (N = 30) to elicit feedback on survey findings and the outline of an implementation strategy to facilitate implementation of evidence-based family caregiver support (the Caregiver Support Accelerator). Survey data was tabulated using descriptive statistics and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Top factors for developing new caregiver programs were that the program be: consistent with the cancer center's mission and strategic plan (87%), supported by clinic leadership (86.5%) and providers and staff (85.7%), and low cost or cost effective (84.9%). Top training needs were how to: train staff to implement programs (72.3%), obtain program materials (63.0%), and evaluate program outcomes (62.6%). Only 3.8% reported that no training was needed. Qualitative interviews yielded four main themes: (1) gaining leadership, clinician, and staff buy-in and support is essential; (2) cost and clinician burden are major factors to program implementation; (3) training should help with adapting and marketing programs to local context and culture; and (4) the Accelerator strategy is comprehensive and would benefit from key organizational partnerships and policy standards. CONCLUSION Findings will be used to inform and refine the Accelerator implementation strategy to facilitate the adoption and growth of evidence-based cancer caregiver support in U.S. cancer centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Nicholas Odom
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- UAB Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Heather M. Young
- Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | | | - Chandelyn Nightingale
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Diane Meier
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tamryn F. Gray
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Maria E. Fernandez
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heidi Donovan
- Schools of Nursing and Medicine, and the National Rehabilitation Research & Training Center on Family Support, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kayleigh Curry
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Erin R. Currie
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Marie A. Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- UAB Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Allison J. Applebaum
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buja A, Cozzolino C, Zanovello A, Geppini R, Miatton A, Zorzi M, Manfredi M, Bovo E, Del Fiore P, Tropea S, dall’Olmo L, Rossi CR, Mocellin S, Rastrelli M, Rugge M. Cost items in melanoma patients by clinical characteristics and time from diagnosis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1234931. [PMID: 38023154 PMCID: PMC10666743 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1234931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Costs related to the care of melanoma patients have been rising over the past few years due to increased disease incidence as well as the introduction of innovative treatments. The aim of this study is to analyse CMM cost items based on stage at diagnosis, together with other diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of the melanoma. Methods Analyses were performed on 2,647 incident cases of invasive CMM that were registered in 2015 and 2017 in the Veneto Cancer Registry (RTV). Direct melanoma-related costs per patient were calculated for each year ranging from 2 years before diagnosis to 4 years after, and were stratified by cost items such as outpatient services, inpatient drug prescriptions, hospital admissions, hospice admissions, and emergency room treatment. Average yearly costs per patient were compared according to available clinical-pathological characteristics. Lastly, log-linear multivariable analysis was performed to investigate potential cost drivers among these clinical-pathological characteristics. Findings Overall, the average direct costs related to melanoma are highest in the first year after diagnosis (€2,903) and then decrease over time. Hospitalization costs are 8 to 16 times higher in the first year than in subsequent years, while the costs of outpatient services and inpatient drugs decrease gradually over time. When stratified by stage it is observed that the higher expenditure associated with more advanced stages of CMM is mainly due to inpatient drug use. Conclusion The results of the present study show that grouping patients according to tumour characteristics can improve our understanding of the different cost items associated with cutaneous malignant melanoma. CMM patients experience higher costs in the first year after diagnosis due to higher hospitalization and outpatient services. Policy makers should consider overall and stage-specific annual costs when allocating resources for the management of CMM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Buja
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Claudia Cozzolino
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | - Anna Zanovello
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | - Ruggero Geppini
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Miatton
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Manuel Zorzi
- Veneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy
| | - Mariagiovanna Manfredi
- Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Del Fiore
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | - Saveria Tropea
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | - Luigi dall’Olmo
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Riccardo Rossi
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Simone Mocellin
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Rastrelli
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Rugge
- Veneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy
- Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su M, Liu S, Liu L, Wang F, Lao J, Sun X. Heterogeneity of financial toxicity and associated risk factors for older cancer survivors in China. iScience 2023; 26:107768. [PMID: 37731611 PMCID: PMC10507189 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In China, older cancer survivors may show heterogeneity in financial toxicity (FT). We aimed to identify FT profiles among older Chinese cancer survivors and examine the association between FT profiles and individual characteristics. We used a latent profile analysis to categorize participants and a multinomial logistic regression to examine the associations. We identified three distinct FT profiles: high, moderate, and low. Participants aged 65-69 years, with a monthly household income ≥ 5,000 CNY and a high school education or above were more likely to be classified into the moderate than high FT profile, a monthly household income ≥ 5,000 CNY increased the likelihood of being in the low FT profile and living alone negatively affected the odds of being in the low FT profile. The findings identified heterogeneity in FT among this population, may help identify high-risk groups, and may enable early intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingzhu Su
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Siqi Liu
- Center of Health System and Policy, Institute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Li Liu
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Center of Health System and Policy, Institute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Jiahui Lao
- Center for Big Data Research in Health and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan Shandong, China
| | - Xiaojie Sun
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yeager KA, Zahnd WE, Eberth JM, Vanderpool RC, Rohweder C, Teal R, Vu M, Stradtman L, Frost EL, Trapl E, Gonzalez SK, Vu T, Ko LK, Cole A, Farris PE, Shannon J, Askelson N, Seegmiller L, White A, Edward J, Davis M, Petermann V, Wheeler SB. Financial navigation: Staff perspectives on patients' financial burden of cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1461-1470. [PMID: 35080699 PMCID: PMC9314461 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01175-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe perceptions of financial navigation staff concerning patients' cancer-related financial burden. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study used a semi-structured interview guide to examine perceptions of financial navigation staff concerning patients' cancer-related financial burden. Staff who provided financial navigation support services to cancer patients were interviewed from different types of cancer programs across seven states representing rural, micropolitan, and urban settings. Interviews lasted approximately one hour, were audio recorded, and transcribed. Transcripts were double coded for thematic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-five staff from 29 cancer centers were interviewed. The first theme involved communication issues related to patient and financial navigation staff expectations, timing and the sensitive nature of financial discussions. The second theme involved the multi-faceted impact of financial burden on patients, including stress, difficulty adhering to treatments, and challenges meeting basic, non-medical needs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer-related financial burden has a profound impact on cancer survivors' health and non-health outcomes. Discussions regarding cancer-related costs between cancer survivors and healthcare team members could help to normalize conversations and mitigate the multi-faceted determinants and effects of cancer-related financial burden. As treatment may span months and years and unexpected costs arise, having this discussion regularly and systematically is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Whitney E Zahnd
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Randall Teal
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Maihan Vu
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Erika Trapl
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Thuy Vu
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Linda K Ko
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Arica White
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Melinda Davis
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rathnayake K, Patel U, Hunt EC, Singh N. Fabrication of a Dual-Targeted Liposome-Coated Mesoporous Silica Core-Shell Nanoassembly for Targeted Cancer Therapy. ACS OMEGA 2023; 8:34481-34498. [PMID: 37779923 PMCID: PMC10536893 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Nanoparticles have been suggested as drug-delivery systems for chemotherapeutic drugs to allow for controlled drug release profiles and selectivity to target cancer cells. In addition, nanoparticles can be used for the in situ generation and amplification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have been shown to be a promising strategy for cancer treatment. Thus, a targeted nanoscale drug-delivery platform could be used to synergistically improve cancer treatment by the action of chemotherapeutic drugs and ROS generation. Herein, we propose a promising chemotherapy strategy where the drug-loaded nanoparticles generate high doses of ROS together with the loaded ROS-generating chemotherapeutic drugs, which can damage the mitochondria and activate cell death, potentiating the therapeutic outcome in cancer therapy. In the present study, we have developed a dual-targeted drug-delivery nanoassembly consisting of a mesoporous silica core loaded with the chemotherapeutic, ROS-generating drug, paclitaxel (Px), and coated with a liposome layer for controlled drug release. Two different lung cancer-targeting ligands, folic acid and peptide GE11, were used to target the overexpressed nonsmall lung cancer receptors to create the final nanoassembly (MSN@Px) L-GF. Upon endocytosis by the cancer cells, the liposome layer was degraded by the intracellular lipases, and the drug was rapidly released at a rate of 65% within the first 20 h. In vitro studies confirmed that this nanoassembly was 8-fold more effective in cancer therapy compared to the free drug Px.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavini Rathnayake
- Department of Chemistry, The
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States
| | - Unnati Patel
- Department of Chemistry, The
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States
| | - Emily C. Hunt
- Department of Chemistry, The
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States
| | - Nirupama Singh
- Department of Chemistry, The
University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pham PD, Schlander M, Eckford R, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Ubels J. Developing a Conceptual Framework for Socioeconomic Impact Research in European Cancer Patients: A 'Best-Fit' Framework Synthesis. THE PATIENT 2023; 16:515-536. [PMID: 37368196 PMCID: PMC10409844 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00632-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple studies have indicated a socioeconomic impact of cancer and cancer care on patients and their families. Existing instruments designed to measure this impact lack consensus in their conceptualization of the issue. Further, various terminologies have been used in the literature (e.g., financial burden, financial hardship, financial stress) without clear definitions and consistent conceptual background. Based on a targeted review of existing models addressing the socioeconomic impact of cancer, our goal was to develop a comprehensive framework from a European perspective. METHOD A 'best-fit' framework synthesis was applied. First, we systematically identified existing models to generate a priori concepts. Second, we systematically identified relevant European qualitative studies and coded their results against these a priori concepts. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predefined and applied thoroughly in these processes. Thematic analysis and team discussions were applied to finalize the (sub)themes in our proposed conceptual framework. Third, we examined model structures and quotes from qualitative studies to explore relationships among (sub)themes. This process was repeated until no further change in (sub)themes and their relationships emerged. RESULT Eighteen studies containing conceptual models and seven qualitative studies were identified. Eight concepts and 20 sub-concepts were derived from the included models. After coding the included qualitative studies against the a priori concepts and following discussions among team members, seven themes and 15 sub-themes were included in our proposed conceptual framework. Based on the identified relationships, we categorized themes into four groups: causes, intermediate consequences, outcomes and risk factors. CONCLUSION We propose a Socioeconomic Impact Framework based on a targeted review and synthesis of existing models in the field and adapted to the European perspective. Our work contributes as an input to a European consensus project on socioeconomic impact research by an Organization European Cancer Institute (OECI) Task Force.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phu Duy Pham
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Schlander
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
- Alfred Weber Institute (AWI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Institute for Innovation and Valuation in Health Care (InnoVal-HC), Wiesbaden, Germany.
| | - Rachel Eckford
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jasper Ubels
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shi JJ, Maldonado JA, Wu CF, Peterson SK, Chen YS, Diao K, Volk RJ, Giordano SH, Shih YCT, Kaiser K, Smith GL. Financial toxicity in cancer patients and subsequent risk of repeat acute care utilization. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1209526. [PMID: 37663351 PMCID: PMC10469858 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1209526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acute care (AC) visits by cancer patients are costly sources of healthcare resources and can exert a financial burden of oncology care both for individuals with cancer and healthcare systems. We sought to identify whether cancer patients who reported more severe initial financial toxicity (FT) burdens shouldered excess risks for acute care utilization. Methods In 225 adult patients who participated in the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) survey study of individuals receiving ambulatory cancer care between March and September 2019, we measured the baseline FT (a multidimensional score of 0-10 indicating the least to most severe global, material, and coping FT burdens). All AC visits, including emergency department (ED) and unplanned hospital admissions, within 1-year follow-up were identified. The association between the severity of FT and the total number of AC visits was tested using Poisson regression models. Results A total of 18.6% (n = 42) of patients had any AC visit, comprising 64.3% hospital admissions and 35.7% ED visits. Global FT burden was associated with the risk of repeat AC visits within 1-year follow-up (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.29, P < 0.001 for every unit increase), even after adjusting for sociodemographic and disease covariates. When examining subdimensions of FT, the burden of depleted FT coping resources (coping FT) was strongly associated with the risk of repeat AC visits (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40, P < 0.001) while material FT burden showed a trend toward association (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, P = 0.07). Conclusion In this prospective study of acute oncology care utilization outcomes among adult cancer patients, FT was a predictor of a higher burden of acute care visits. Patients with severely depleted material and also practical and social coping resources were at particular risk for repeated visits. Future studies are needed to identify whether early FT screening and intervention efforts may help to mitigate urgent acute care utilization burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia J. Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - J. Alberto Maldonado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- John Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert J. Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sharon H. Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ya-Chen T. Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kelsey Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thomson MD, Van Houtven CH, Xu R, Siminoff LA. The many "costs" of transportation: Examining what cancer caregivers experience as transportation obstacles. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17356-17364. [PMID: 37485648 PMCID: PMC10501274 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transportation has been identified as a specific source of burden for cancer caregivers. This study examined cancer caregivers' subjective experiences and objectives costs associated with transportation over a 6-month period of providing end-of-life care to a family member or friend. METHODS This was a multi-site longitudinal, prospective cohort study that followed 223 caregiver-patient dyads. Data were collected using biweekly, semi-structured interviews for up to 6 months and collection of all caregiving related receipts. Interviews were coded and analyzed using a comparative, iterative analysis and actual out of pockets costs were described using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Over the 6-month study period most caregivers (n = 143; 74%) discussed transportation at one or more timepoints. Average biweekly transportations costs to caregivers were $43.6. Caregivers described (n = 56; 39%) multiple direct and indirect costs of transportation, and 58% (n = 84) discussed the need for transportations services or assistance at the institutional level. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers described the multifaceted costs of transportation they experienced which are in line with previous work. Alongside descriptions of direct costs, caregivers described key opportunity costs, such as personal and work time forgone to transporting patients. Caregivers also made suggestions for institutional and/or civic based solutions to facilitate reliable modes of transportation, rather than individual-level intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria D. Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and PolicyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Courtney Harold Van Houtven
- Department of Population Health SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- Durham ADAPT, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical CenterDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rebecca Xu
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of MedicineRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Laura A. Siminoff
- Department of Social and Behavioral SciencesTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pisu M, Liang MI, Pressman SD, Ryff CD, Patel MR, Hussein M, Williams CP, Henrikson NB, Schoenberger YM, Pracht LJ, Bradshaw E, Carpenter TT, Matthis A, Schwartz DL, Martin MY. Expanding research on the impact of financial hardship on emotional well-being: guidance of diverse stakeholders to the Emotional Well-Being and Economic Burden of Disease (EMOT-ECON) Research Network. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1196525. [PMID: 37575433 PMCID: PMC10416236 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The Emotional Well-Being and Economic Burden (EMOT-ECON) Research Network is one of six research networks funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to advance research about emotional well-being (EWB), and the only one that focuses on addressing how economic burden due to disease or illness affects EWB. The network convened researchers, patients, patient advocates, health care providers and other stakeholders from across the US to discuss the significance of addressing the impact of the economic burden of disease on EWB, the complexity of this prevalent problem for patients and families, and the research gaps that still need to be studied to ultimately develop strategies to reduce the impact of economic burden of disease on EWB and health. Participants identified some important future areas of research as those investigating: (i) prevalent and relevant emotions for patients experiencing economic burden of disease and financial hardship, and how their broader outlook on life is impacted; (ii) constructs and contexts that influence whether the economic burden is stressful; (iii) strategies to deal and cope and their positive or negative effects on EWB and health; and (iv) multi-level and multi-stakeholder interventions to address economic factors (e.g., costs, ability to pay), administrative burdens, education and training, and especially patients' emotional as well as financial status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine and O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Margaret I. Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sarah D. Pressman
- Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Carol D. Ryff
- Department of Psychology and Institute on Aging, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Minal R. Patel
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mustafa Hussein
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, The City University of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - Courtney P. Williams
- Division of Preventive Medicine and O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Nora B. Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente, Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Yu-Mei Schoenberger
- Division of Preventive Medicine and O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | - Erin Bradshaw
- Patient Advocate Foundation, Patient Insight Institute, Hampton, VA, United States
| | | | - Amy Matthis
- American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, VA, United States
| | - David L. Schwartz
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Michelle Y. Martin
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Center for Innovation in Health Equity Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ghazal LV, Watson SE, Gentry B, Santacroce SJ. "Both a life saver and totally shameful": young adult cancer survivors' perceptions of medical crowdfunding. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:332-341. [PMID: 35169983 PMCID: PMC9378759 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Young adults (YAs) diagnosed with cancer face high financial burden at a time in their lives when they are financially vulnerable. Some turn to medical crowdfunding, that is, using social media and other means to raise funds or resources to offset medical and usual life expenses. Major research gaps exist regarding the experiences of those who pursued crowdfunding. Thus, the study purpose was to describe the perceptions of, and experiences with, medical crowdfunding among a sample of YA cancer survivors. METHODS In February 2021, we distributed an online survey to YAs with a history of a cancer diagnosis, who had received grants from an organization that offers financial assistance. We calculated descriptive statistics on the crowdfunding sample and employed thematic analysis to analyze the open-ended questions. RESULTS In this sample (N = 113), 46 YA cancer survivors had engaged in medical crowdfunding and shared their perceptions and experiences. Our central theme, "The Crowdfunding Compromise" captures the trade-offs participants faced, which included subthemes of "crowdfunding as useful/helpful," "factors associated with crowdfunding success," and "questioning the why?". CONCLUSIONS Among YA cancer survivors, medical crowdfunding brings shame and stigma in addition to financial support. YA cancer survivors demonstrate resilience in their attempts to find individual solutions to financial problems created by unchecked health care costs, the US health insurance infrastructure, and lack of legislation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This study fills an important gap in understanding individual-level crowdfunding experiences. Implications include system-level approaches to addressing cancer-related financial burden and potential worsening of existing disparities through medical crowdfunding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren V Ghazal
- Center for Improving Patient and Population Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Ann, Arbor, MI, USA.
| | | | | | - Sheila J Santacroce
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Factors Associated with the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061686. [PMID: 36980573 PMCID: PMC10046757 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes have long been well-documented in the medical literature. With the eruption of advances in new treatment modalities, the long-existing disparities are now being further uncovered and brought to the attention of the medical community. While social health determinants have previously been linked to treatment disparities in lung cancer, we analyzed data from the National Cancer Database to explore sociodemographic and geographic factors related to accepting or declining physician-recommended chemotherapy. Patients diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer between 2004 and 2016 who declined chemotherapy recommended by their physicians were included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Cox Regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to look for survival characteristics. (2) Results: 316,826 patients with Stage IV lung cancer were identified. Factors related to a higher rate of refusal by patients included older age > 70, female sex, low income, lack of insurance coverage, residency in the New England region, and higher comorbidity. Patients living in areas with lower education were less likely to decline chemotherapy. (3) Conclusion: Further understanding of the factors impacting treatment decisions would be essential to improve the efficacy of care delivery in patients with cancer and reduce reversible causes of disparity.
Collapse
|
17
|
Robien K, Clausen M, Sullo E, Ford YR, Griffith KA, Le D, Wickersham KE, Wallington SF. Prevalence of Food Insecurity Among Cancer Survivors in the United States: A Scoping Review. J Acad Nutr Diet 2023; 123:330-346. [PMID: 35840079 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical financial hardship is an increasingly common consequence of cancer treatment and can lead to food insecurity. However, food security status is not routinely assessed in the health care setting, and the prevalence of food insecurity among cancer survivors is unknown. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aimed to identify the prevalence of food insecurity among cancer survivors in the United States before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL [Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature], Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) were systematically searched for articles that reported on food security status among US patients receiving active cancer treatment or longer-term cancer survivors and were published between January 2015 and December 2020. RESULTS Among the 15 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, overall food insecurity prevalence ranged from 4.0% among women presenting to a gynecologic oncology clinic to 83.6% among patients at Federally Qualified Health Centers. Excluding studies focused specifically on Federally Qualified Health Center patients, prevalence of food insecurity ranged from 4.0% to 26.2%, which overlaps the food insecurity prevalence in the general US population during the same time period (range, 10.5% to 14.9%). Women were more likely than men to report being food insecure, and the prevalence of food insecurity was higher among Hispanic and Black patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients. CONCLUSIONS Given significant heterogeneity in study populations and sample sizes, it was not possible to estimate an overall food insecurity prevalence among cancer survivors in the United States. Routine surveillance of food security status and other social determinants of health is needed to better detect and address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Robien
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC; GW Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
| | | | - Elaine Sullo
- Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Yvonne R Ford
- School of Nursing, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
| | - Kathleen A Griffith
- GW Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC; School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Daisy Le
- GW Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC; School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | | | - Sherrie Flynt Wallington
- GW Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC; School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tessmann JW, Rocha MR, Morgado-Díaz JA. Mechanisms of radioresistance and the underlying signaling pathways in colorectal cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 2023; 124:31-45. [PMID: 36565460 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.30361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the most common modalities for the treatment of a wide range of tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC); however, radioresistance of cancer cells remains a major limitation for this treatment. Following radiotherapy, the activities of various cellular mechanisms and cell signaling pathways are altered, resulting in the development of radioresistance, which leads to therapeutic failure and poor prognosis in patients with cancer. Furthermore, even though several inhibitors have been developed to target tumor resistance, these molecules can induce side effects in nontumor cells due to low specificity and efficiency. However, the role of these mechanisms in CRC has not been extensively studied. This review discusses recent studies regarding the relationship between radioresistance and the alterations in a series of cellular mechanisms and cell signaling pathways that lead to therapeutic failure and tumor recurrence. Our review also presents recent advances in the in vitro/in vivo study models aimed at investigating the radioresistance mechanism in CRC. Furthermore, it provides a relevant biochemical basis in theory, which can be useful to improve radiotherapy sensitivity and prolong patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josiane W Tessmann
- Cellular and Molecular Oncobiology Program, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Murilo R Rocha
- Cellular and Molecular Oncobiology Program, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Jose A Morgado-Díaz
- Cellular and Molecular Oncobiology Program, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fan Q, Keene DE, Banegas MP, Gehlert S, Gottlieb LM, Yabroff KR, Pollack CE. Housing Insecurity Among Patients With Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1584-1592. [PMID: 36130291 PMCID: PMC9949594 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Social determinants of health are the economic and environmental conditions under which people are born, live, work, and age that affect health. These structural factors underlie many of the long-standing inequities in cancer care and outcomes that vary by geography, socioeconomic status, and race and ethnicity in the United States. Housing insecurity, including lack of safe, affordable, and stable housing, is a key social determinant of health that can influence-and be influenced by-cancer care across the continuum, from prevention to screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. During 2021, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine sponsored a series of webinars addressing social determinants of health, including food, housing, and transportation insecurity, and their associations with cancer care and patient outcomes. This dissemination commentary summarizes the formal presentations and panel discussions from the webinar devoted to housing insecurity. It provides an overview of housing insecurity and health care across the cancer control continuum, describes health system interventions to minimize the impact of housing insecurity on patients with cancer, and identifies challenges and opportunities for addressing housing insecurity and improving health equity. Systematically identifying and addressing housing insecurity to ensure equitable access to cancer care and reduce health disparities will require ongoing investment at the practice, systems, and broader policy levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinjin Fan
- Correspondence to: Qinjin Fan, PhD, Surveillance & Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, 3380 Chastain Meadows Pkwy, NW Suite 200, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Danya E Keene
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Gehlert
- Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laura M Gottlieb
- Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Craig E Pollack
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Islam JY, Turner K, Saeb H, Powell M, Dean LT, Camacho-Rivera M. Financial hardship and mental health among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the US COVID-19 Household Impact Survey. Front Public Health 2022; 10:946721. [PMID: 36483249 PMCID: PMC9723235 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our objective was to (1) identify associated characteristics of financial hardship (FH), and (2) evaluate associations of FH with mental health symptoms among cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Using data from the nationally representative COVID-19 Impact Survey, we defined cancer survivors as those with a self-reported diagnosis of cancer (n = 854,7.6%). We defined FH using the following question: "Based on your current financial situation, how would you pay for an unexpected $400 expense?" Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to identify associated characteristics of FH and associations of FH with mental health symptoms among cancer survivors overall and by age (18-59 years/60+ years). Results Forty-one percent of cancer survivors reported FH, with 58% in 18-59 and 33% in 60+ year old respondents. Compared to cancer survivors aged 60+ years, those aged 30-44 (aPR:1.74,95% CI:1.35-2.24), and 45-59 years (aPR:1.60,95% CI:1.27-1.99) were more likely to report FH. Compared to non-Hispanic(NH)-White cancer survivors, NH-Black cancer survivors had a 56% higher prevalence of FH (aPR:1.56; 95% CI: 1.23-1.97). Among 60+ years aged cancer survivors, NH-Black (aPR:1.80; 95% CI: 1.32-2.45) and NH-Asian cancer survivors (aPR:10.70,95% CI:5.6-20.7) were more likely to experience FH compared to their NH-White counterparts. FH was associated with feeling anxious (aPR:1.51,95% CI:1.11-2.05), depressed (aPR:1.66,95% CI:1.25-2.22), and hopeless (aPR:1.84,95% CI:1.38-2.44). Conclusion Minoritized communities, younger adults, and cancer survivors with low socioeconomic status had a higher burden of FH, which was associated with feelings of anxiety, depression, and hopelessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y. Islam
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States,*Correspondence: Jessica Y. Islam
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States,Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Huda Saeb
- Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Margaux Powell
- Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Lorraine T. Dean
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States,Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Marlene Camacho-Rivera
- Department of Community Health Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Voleti SS, Warsame R, Mead-Harvey C, Ailawadhi S, Jain A, Fonseca R, Griffin JM, Khera N. Assessing Patient-Reported Financial Hardship in Patients With Cancer in Routine Clinical Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1839-e1853. [PMID: 36166729 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial hardship (FH) in cancer care is a growing challenge for patients, their caregivers, and health care providers with impact on morbidity and mortality. In this study, we report on a standardized approach to describe the prevalence and predictors for FH as part of routine clinical workflow. We also report on the association of FH with survival in our cancer patient population. METHODS This study includes patients who completed a FH screen at least once between 2018 and 2020. Demographics, disease state, and mortality data were extracted from the medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine association of sociodemographic and disease variables with FH. By using propensity score weighting to account for differences in demographic and clinical factors between patients with and without FH, we then fit Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between FH and survival. RESULTS The study cohort included 31,154 patients. FH was reported by 14% (n = 4,250) of the patients. A significantly higher likelihood of having FH (P < .001 for all) was reported by racial/ethnic minority patients; those who were unemployed/disabled, single, or divorced; patients from disadvantaged neighborhoods; and those who were self-pay or had government insurance. Older age, being retired, and living farther from the cancer center were associated with significantly less likelihood of endorsing FH. Patients who endorsed FH had a lower survival (hazard ratio for mortality 1.46). CONCLUSION Our study identified key groups more likely to report FH in a relatively affluent population at a large cancer center and showed an adverse association between FH and survival. Further research is needed to develop clinical care pathways for patients at high risk for worse financial and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rahma Warsame
- Mayo Clinic Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Atul Jain
- Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Rafael Fonseca
- Mayo Clinic Department of Hematology and Oncology, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Joan M Griffin
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN.,Mayo Clinic Division of Healthcare Delivery Research, Rochester, MN
| | - Nandita Khera
- Mayo Clinic Department of Hematology and Oncology, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Francisci S, Capodaglio G, Gigli A, Mollica C, Guzzinati S. Cancer cost profiles: The Epicost estimation approach. Front Public Health 2022; 10:974505. [PMID: 36211660 PMCID: PMC9533128 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.974505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Sustainability of cancer burden is becoming increasingly central in the policy makers' debate, and poses a challenge for the welfare systems, due to trends towards greater intensity of healthcare service use, which imply increasing costs of cancer care. Measuring and projecting the economic burden associated with cancer and identifying effective policies for minimising its impact are important issues for healthcare systems. Scope of this paper is to illustrate a novel comprehensive approach (called Epicost) to the estimation of the economic burden of cancer, based on micro-data collected from multiple data sources. It consists of a model of cost analysis to estimate the amount of reimbursement payed by the National Health Service to health service providers (hospitals, ambulatories, pharmacies) for the expenses incurred in the diagnoses and treatments of a cohort of cancer patients; these cancer costs are estimated in various phases of the disease reflecting patients' patterns of care: initial, monitoring and final phase. The main methodological features are illustrated using a cohort of colon cancer cases from a Cancer Registry in Italy. This approach has been successfully implemented in Italy and it has been adapted to other European countries, such as Belgium, Norway and Poland in the framework of the Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer (iPAAC) Joint Action, sponsored by the European Commission. It is replicable in countries/regions where population-based cancer registry data is available and linkable at individual level with administrative data on costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Francisci
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Guilia Capodaglio
- Screening and Health Impact Assessment Unit, Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy
| | - Anna Gigli
- Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Mollica
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Guzzinati
- Regional Epidemiological Service, Veneto Cancer Registry (RTV), Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy,*Correspondence: Stefano Guzzinati
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Smith GL, Banegas MP, Acquati C, Chang S, Chino F, Conti RM, Greenup RA, Kroll JL, Liang MI, Pisu M, Primm KM, Roth ME, Shankaran V, Yabroff KR. Navigating financial toxicity in patients with cancer: A multidisciplinary management approach. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:437-453. [PMID: 35584404 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately one-half of individuals with cancer face personal economic burdens associated with the disease and its treatment, a problem known as financial toxicity (FT). FT more frequently affects socioeconomically vulnerable individuals and leads to subsequent adverse economic and health outcomes. Whereas multilevel systemic factors at the policy, payer, and provider levels drive FT, there are also accompanying intervenable patient-level factors that exacerbate FT in the setting of clinical care delivery. The primary strategy to intervene on FT at the patient level is financial navigation. Financial navigation uses comprehensive assessment of patients' risk factors for FT, guidance toward support resources, and referrals to assist patient financial needs during cancer care. Social workers or nurse navigators most frequently lead financial navigation. Oncologists and clinical provider teams are multidisciplinary partners who can support optimal FT management in the context of their clinical roles. Oncologists and clinical provider teams can proactively assess patient concerns about the financial hardship and employment effects of disease and treatment. They can respond by streamlining clinical treatment and care delivery planning and incorporating FT concerns into comprehensive goals of care discussions and coordinated symptom and psychosocial care. By understanding how age and life stage, socioeconomic, and cultural factors modify FT trajectory, oncologists and multidisciplinary health care teams can be engaged and informative in patient-centered, tailored FT management. The case presentations in this report provide a practical context to summarize authors' recommendations for patient-level FT management, supported by a review of key supporting evidence and a discussion of challenges to mitigating FT in oncology care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:437-453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shine Chang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rena M Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University School of Business, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Juliet L Kroll
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Maria Pisu
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kristin M Primm
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Williams CP, Davidoff A, Halpern MT, Mollica M, Castro K, Allaire B, de Moor JS. Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Patient Cost Responsibility for Rural and Urban Cancer Survivors. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1234-e1246. [PMID: 35947881 PMCID: PMC9377697 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The relationship between out-of-pocket spending and cost-related medication nonadherence among older rural- and urban-dwelling cancer survivors is not well understood. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, Medicare claims, and the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey linked data resource linked data (2007-2015) to investigate the relationship between cancer survivors' cost responsibility in the year before and after report of delaying or not filling a prescription medication because of cost in the past 6 months (cost-related medication nonadherence). Secondary exposures and outcomes included Medicare spending and utilization. Generalized linear models assessed bidirectional relationships between cost-related medication nonadherence, spending, and utilization. Effects of residence were assessed via interaction terms. RESULTS Of 6,591 older cancer survivors, 13% reported cost-related medication nonadherence. Survivors were a median 8 years (interquartile range, 4.5-12.5 years) from their cancer diagnosis, 15% were dually Medicare/Medicaid-eligible, and prostate (40%) and breast (32%) cancer survivors were most prevalent. With every $500 USD increase in patient cost responsibility, risk of cost-related medication nonadherence increased by 3% (risk ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04). After report of cost-related medication nonadherence, patient cost responsibility was 22% higher (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.32) compared with those not reporting nonadherence, amounting to $523 USD (95% CI, $430 USD to $630 USD). Medicare spending and utilization were also higher before and after report of cost-related nonadherence versus none. For survivors residing in rural (18%) and urban (82%) areas, residence did not modify adherence or cost outcomes. CONCLUSION A bidirectional relationship exists between patient cost responsibility and cost-related medication nonadherence. Interventions reducing urban- and rural-dwelling survivor health care costs and cost-related adherence barriers are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P. Williams
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Amy Davidoff
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Michael T. Halpern
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Michelle Mollica
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Kathleen Castro
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Janet S. de Moor
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ver Hoeve ES, Simon MA, Danner SM, Washington AJ, Coples SD, Percac-Lima S, Whited EC, Paskett ED, Naughton MJ, Gray DM, Wenzel JA, Zabora JR, Hassoon A, Tolbert EE, Calhoun E, Barton DL, Friese CR, Titler MG, Hamann HA. Implementing patient navigation programs: Considerations and lessons learned from the Alliance to Advance Patient-Centered Cancer Care. Cancer 2022; 128:2806-2816. [PMID: 35579501 PMCID: PMC9261966 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Six multidisciplinary cancer centers were selected and funded by the Merck Foundation (2017-2021) to collaborate in the Alliance to Advance Patient-Centered Cancer Care ("Alliance"), an initiative to improve patient access, minimize health disparities, and enhance the quality of patient-centered cancer care. These sites share their insights on implementation and expansion of their patient navigation efforts. METHODS Patient navigation represents an evidence-based health care intervention designed to enhance patient-centered care and care coordination. Investigators at 6 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers outline their approaches to reducing health care disparities and synthesize their efforts to ensure sustainability and successful transferability in the management of patients with cancer and their families in real-world health care settings. RESULTS Insights are outlined within the context of patient navigation program effectiveness and supported by examples from Alliance cancer center sites: 1) understand the patient populations, particularly underserved and high-risk patients; 2) capitalize on the existing infrastructure and institutional commitment to support and sustain patient navigation; and 3) build capacity by mobilizing community support outside of the cancer center. CONCLUSIONS This process-level article reflects the importance of collaboration and the usefulness of partnering with other cancer centers to share interdisciplinary insights while undergoing intervention development, implementation, and expansion. These collective insights may be useful to staff at other cancer centers that look to implement, enhance, or evaluate the effectiveness of their patient navigation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa A. Simon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sankirtana M. Danner
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Susan D. Coples
- Georgia Cancer Center for Excellence at Grady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | - Darrell M. Gray
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jennifer A. Wenzel
- The Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James R. Zabora
- The Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ahmed Hassoon
- The Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elliott E. Tolbert
- The Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Debra L. Barton
- The University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Marita G. Titler
- The University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nicholas LH, Davidoff AJ, Howard DH, Keating NL, Ritzwoller DP, Robin Yabroff K, Bradley CJ. Cancer Survivorship and Supportive Care Economics Research: Current Challenges and Next Steps. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:57-63. [PMID: 35788375 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid growth in the number of cancer survivors raises numerous questions about health and economic outcomes among survivors along with their families, caregivers, and employers. Health economics theory and methods can contribute to many open questions to improve survivorship. METHODS In this paper, we review key areas where more research is needed and describe strategies for improving data infrastructure, research funding, and capacity building to strengthen survivorship health economics research. CONCLUSIONS Health economics has broadened an understanding of key supply- and demand-side factors that promote cancer survivorship. To ensure necessary research in survivorship health economics moving forward, we recommend dedicated funding, inclusion of health economics outcomes in primary data collection, and investments in secondary data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Hersch Nicholas
- Department of Health Systems, Management & Policy, Colorado School of Public Health & University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - David H Howard
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Departments of Health Care Policy and Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Cathy J Bradley
- Department of Health Systems, Management & Policy, Colorado School of Public Health & University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jabbal IS, Bilani N, Yaghi M, Elson L, Liang H, Nahleh ZA. Geographical Disparities and Factors Associated With the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1417-e1426. [PMID: 35658495 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Social determinants of health have been linked to treatment-related disparities in breast cancer. We analyzed data from a large national registry to explore factors related to accepting or declining recommended chemotherapy and whether patients' decisions vary geographically across the United States. METHODS We used the National Cancer Database to study treatment decision making in patients with advanced breast cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage III-IV) between 2004 and 2017. We focused the analysis on patients who were recommended chemotherapy by their physicians but who declined this treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of N = 215,284 patients with stage III and IV breast cancers were included. Patients in the New England region were more likely to refuse chemotherapy compared with the rest, with patients in the East South Central regions (AL, KY, MS, and TN) and West South Central (AR, LA, OK, and TX) noted to be least likely to refuse chemotherapy. Factors related to a higher rate of refusal by patients included older age > 70 years; hormone receptor-positive tumors; and having higher comorbidity. Patients identified as Hispanic, those who are privately insured, and patients at academic institutions were less likely to decline chemotherapy. CONCLUSION This analysis identified a significant difference in rates of refusal of recommended chemotherapy by geographical location, insurance status, and treatment facility after adjusting for known social determinants of health. Further understanding of the factors affecting treatment decisions would be important to improve the efficacy of care delivery in patients with cancer and reduce reversible causes of disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iktej S Jabbal
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL
| | - Nadeem Bilani
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL
| | - Marita Yaghi
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL
| | - Leah Elson
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL
| | - Hong Liang
- Department of Clinical Research, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL
| | - Zeina A Nahleh
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Silverman C, Ng BP, Baek C, Park C. Prescription drug coverage satisfaction and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 22:971-979. [PMID: 35484941 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2064846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication nonadherence among older patients with cancer can have profound health consequences. This study examines the association between prescription drug coverage satisfaction and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. METHODS We analyzed the 2017 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with reported non-skin cancer (n = 806). Beneficiaries were considered to have medication nonadherence if they reported: skipping doses, taking smaller doses than prescribed, or delaying or not filling a prescription because of cost. A survey-weighted logistic model, adjusted for covariates, was conducted to examine the association between prescription drug coverage satisfaction and medication nonadherence. RESULTS Of study beneficiaries with cancer, 14.7% reported medication nonadherence. Higher proportions of beneficiaries with medication nonadherence were dissatisfied with the amount paid for medications (33.2% vs. 11.0%, p < 0.001) and the medications included on formulary (29.5% vs 5.2%, p < 0.001). In the adjusted analysis, the risk for medication nonadherence was higher among those who were dissatisfied with the amount paid for medications (OR = 2.22; p = 0.050) and the medications included on formulary (OR = 5.03; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Strategic mitigation of these barriers is essential to improving health outcomes in this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Silverman
- Department of Pharmacy and Health Systems Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boon Peng Ng
- College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fl, Usa and Disability, Aging, and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Chaewon Baek
- Department of Pharmacy and Health Systems Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chanhyun Park
- Health Outcomes Division, College of Pharmacy, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tx, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Su CT, Veenstra CM, Patel MR. Divergent Patterns in Care Utilization and Financial Distress between Patients with Blood Cancers and Solid Tumors: A National Health Interview Survey Study, 2014-2020. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071605. [PMID: 35406377 PMCID: PMC8996850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Important differences exist between the presentation, treatment, and survivorship of patients and survivors with blood cancers. Furthermore, existing research in financial toxicity has not fully addressed the relationship between medical care utilization and patient-reported outcomes of financial barriers and distress. We answered these questions by using a nationally representative survey. Methods: Respondents with blood cancers and solid tumors from the National Health Interview Survey were identified (2014−2020). We identified 23 survey questions as study outcomes and grouped them into three domains of medical care utilization, financial barriers to care, and financial distress. Associations between the three domains and associations of study outcomes between cancer types were examined using weighted univariate analyses and multivariable linear and logistic regressions. Results: The final study group consisted of 6248 respondents with solid tumors and 398 with blood cancers (diagnosed ≤ 5 years). Across all respondents with cancer, higher medical care utilization is generally associated with increased financial barriers to care. Compared to respondents with solid tumors, respondents with blood cancers had a higher level of medical care utilization (β = 0.36, p = 0.02), a lower level of financial barriers to care (β = −0.19, p < 0.0001), and a higher level of financial distress in affording care (β = 0.64, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients and survivors with blood cancers and solid tumors demonstrate divergent patterns in care utilization, financial barriers, and financial distress. Future research and interventions on financial toxicity should be tailored for individual cancer groups, recognizing the differences in medical care utilization, which affect the experienced financial barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T. Su
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (C.M.V.); (M.R.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-734-615-1623
| | - Christine M. Veenstra
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (C.M.V.); (M.R.P.)
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Minal R. Patel
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (C.M.V.); (M.R.P.)
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Leung N, Bernacki SE, Kalia N, Bernacki EJ, Almeida JRC. Long-Term Healthcare Utilization and the Cost of Bipolar Disorder Among Participants in a Large Employer's Health Benefit Plan. J Occup Environ Med 2022; 64:e124-e130. [PMID: 34935680 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic illness with recurrent exacerbations. The objective was to evaluate longitudinal costs related to BD in an employer-sponsored medical plan. METHODS This analysis utilized 5 years of administrative claims data. Claimants with a diagnosis of BD were matched to plan members (1:5) based on age, sex, and years of follow-up. RESULTS Medical costs for hospitalized BD members were 3.5 times more expensive than the general population (BDhosp = $92.2K vs General population = $26.8K). Average 5-year paid costs among hospitalized members with BD was $107K, $105.4K with cancer, and $103.3K with myocardial infarction (MI). CONCLUSIONS Hospitalized BD plan members consumed more than 3.5 times the medical resources and were similar in longitudinal costs when compared with members with other costly conditions. These findings highlight the need for novel employer-sponsored programs to help manage BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Leung
- Department of Population Health (Dr Leung); Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Leung, Dr Kalia, Dr Bernacki); Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Dr Leung); Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, North Carolina (Dr Bernacki); General Electric, Cinncinati, Ohio (Dr Kalia); Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences (Dr Almeida), Department of Population Health (Dr Leung, Dr Bernacki), Dell Medical School, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Factors Associated with the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer and High-Risk Scoring on Genomic Assays. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:367-373. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
32
|
Shaver AL, Tufuor TA, Nie J, Ekimura S, Marshall K, Mitmesser SH, Noyes K. Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6276. [PMID: 34944894 PMCID: PMC8699187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer patients are at risk for malnutrition; the aim of this study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of dietary supplementation in cancer survivors. We estimated prevalence of supplementation, hospitalization rates, quality of life (QOL), cost of care and mortality among cancer survivors. We built a decision analytic model to simulate life-long costs of health care and supplementation and QOL among cancer survivors with and without supplementation. Cost of supplements was derived from national pharmacy databases including single- and multivitamin formularies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to changes in supplementation costs and duration. The study cohort represented the national cancer survivor population (average age 61 years, 85% white, 52% male, and 94% insured). Hospitalization rates for supplement users and non-users were 12% and 21%, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was $4030. Supplementation was associated with an additional 0.48 QALYs (10.26 vs. 9.78) at the incremental cost of $2094 ($236,933 vs. $234,839) over the remaining lifetime of survivors (on average 13 years). Adequate nutrition provides a cost-effective strategy to achieving potentially optimum health. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of specific nutrient doses and supplementation on long-term outcomes per cancer type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L. Shaver
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
| | - Theresa A. Tufuor
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
| | - Jing Nie
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
| | - Shauna Ekimura
- Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA; (S.E.); (K.M.); (S.H.M.)
| | - Keri Marshall
- Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA; (S.E.); (K.M.); (S.H.M.)
| | | | - Katia Noyes
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; (A.L.S.); (T.A.T.); (J.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anderson PM, Thomas SM, Sartoski S, Scott JG, Sobilo K, Bewley S, Salvador LK, Salazar-Abshire M. Strategies to Mitigate Chemotherapy and Radiation Toxicities That Affect Eating. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13124397. [PMID: 34959948 PMCID: PMC8706251 DOI: 10.3390/nu13124397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Cancer and its therapy is commonly associated with a variety of side effects that impact eating behaviors that reduce nutritional intake. This review will outline potential causes of chemotherapy and radiation damage as well as approaches for the amelioration of the side effects of cancer during therapy. Methods: Information for clinicians, patients, and their caregivers about toxicity mitigation including nausea reduction, damage to epithelial structures such as skin and mucosa, organ toxicity, and education is reviewed. Results: How to anticipate, reduce, and prevent some toxicities encountered during chemotherapy and radiation is detailed with the goal to improve eating behaviors. Strategies for health care professionals, caregivers, and patients to consider include (a) the reduction in nausea and vomiting, (b) decreasing damage to the mucosa, (c) avoiding a catabolic state and muscle wasting (sarcopenia), and (d) developing therapeutic alliances with patients, caregivers, and oncologists. Conclusions: Although the reduction of side effects involves anticipatory guidance and proactive team effort (e.g., forward observation, electronic interactions, patient reported outcomes), toxicity reduction can be satisfying for not only the patient, but everyone involved in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M. Anderson
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.M.T.); (S.S.); (K.S.); (S.B.)
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA;
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +216-445-7140 or +216-308-2706
| | - Stefanie M. Thomas
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.M.T.); (S.S.); (K.S.); (S.B.)
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA;
| | - Shauna Sartoski
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.M.T.); (S.S.); (K.S.); (S.B.)
- Department of Nursing, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jacob G. Scott
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kaitlin Sobilo
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.M.T.); (S.S.); (K.S.); (S.B.)
- Department of Nursing, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Sara Bewley
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; (S.M.T.); (S.S.); (K.S.); (S.B.)
- Peds Nutritional Services, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Laura K. Salvador
- Department of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.K.S.); (M.S.-A.)
| | - Maritza Salazar-Abshire
- Department of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.K.S.); (M.S.-A.)
- Department of Nursing Education, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gubler-Gut BE, Pöhlmann J, Flatz A, Schwenkglenks M, Rohrmann S. Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 15:961-975. [PMID: 33624172 PMCID: PMC8521580 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Physical activity has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients. Due to differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, and types of intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors are difficult to compare. Available evidence from breast cancer survivor research has shown inconsistent results, and transfer of results to other types of cancer is not straightforward. This paper systematically reviewed current evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors independent of cancer type compared to usual care or another experimental intervention. METHODS The literature search was conducted in seven databases and enhanced by a search for gray literature. Eligible studies were restricted to developed countries and assessed using the CHEERS, CHEC, and PHILIPS checklists. The study protocol was pre-published in PROSPERO. RESULTS Seven studies, five cost-utility, and two combined cost-utility/cost-effectiveness analyses fully met the inclusion criteria. They covered eight different types of cancer and various interventions. The cost-effectiveness analyses were of moderate to high methodological quality. A high probability of cost-effectiveness was reported in two analyses. One intervention appeared to be not cost-effective, and one to be cost-effective only from an organizational perspective. Three other analyses reported a cost-effectiveness better than US$ 101,195 (€ 80,000) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries were cost-effective in some but not all clinical trials reviewed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions appear to depend upon the intensity of the activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara E. Gubler-Gut
- Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Pöhlmann
- Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Gertrudstrasse15, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Aline Flatz
- Swiss Cancer League, Effingerstrasse 40, 3001 Berne, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Klingenbergstrasse 61, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Rohrmann
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Thulesius H, Sandén U, Petek D, Hoffman R, Koskela T, Oliva-Fanlo B, Neves AL, Hajdarevic S, Harrysson L, Toftegaard BS, Vedsted P, Harris M. Pluralistic task shifting for a more timely cancer diagnosis. A grounded theory study from a primary care perspective. Scand J Prim Health Care 2021; 39:486-497. [PMID: 34889704 PMCID: PMC8725826 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.2004751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how cancer could be diagnosed in a more timely way. DESIGN Grounded theory analysis of primary care physicians' free text survey responses to: 'How do you think the speed of diagnosis of cancer in primary care could be improved?'. Secondary analysis of primary care physician interviews, survey responses, literature. SETTING Primary care in 20 European Örenäs Research Group countries. SUBJECTS Primary care physicians: 1352 survey respondents (2013-2016), 20 Spanish and 7 Swedish interviewees (2015-2019). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Conceptual explanation of how to improve timeliness of cancer diagnosis. RESULTS Pluralistic task shifting is a grounded theory of a composite strategy. It includes task sharing - among nurses, physicians, nurse assistants, secretaries, and patients - and changing tasks with cancer screening when appropriate or cancer fast-tracks to accelerate cancer case finding. A pluralistic dialogue culture of comprehensive collaboration and task redistribution is required for effective pluralistic task shifting. Pluralistic task shifting relies on cognitive task shifting, which includes learning more about slow analytic reasoning and fast automatic thinking initiated by pattern recognition; and digital task shifting, which by use of eHealth and telemedicine bridges time and place and improves power symmetry between patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Financial task shifting that involves cost tracking followed by reallocation of funds is necessary for the restructuring and retraining required for successful pluralistic task shifting. A timely diagnosis reduces expensive investigations and waiting times. Also, late-stage cancers are costlier to treat than early-stage cancers. Timing is central to cancer diagnosis: not too early to avoid overdiagnosis, and never too late. CONCLUSIONS We present pluralistic task shifting as a conceptual summary of strategies needed to optimise the timeliness of cancer diagnosis.Key pointsCancer diagnosis is under-researched in primary care, especially theoretically. Thus, inspired by classic grounded theory, we analysed and conceptualised the field:Pluralistic task shifting is a conceptual explanation of how the timeliness of cancer diagnosis could be improved, with data derived mostly from primary care physicians.This includes task sharing and changing tasks including screening and cancer fast-tracks to accelerate cancer case finding, and requires cognitive task shifting emphasising learning, and digital task shifting involving the use of eHealth and telemedicine.Financial task shifting with cost tracking and reallocation of funds is eventually necessary for successful pluralistic task shifting to happen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Thulesius
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Family Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Research and Development Centre, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden
- Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
- Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- CONTACT Hans Thulesius
| | - Ulrika Sandén
- Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Davorina Petek
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Robert Hoffman
- Departments of Family Medicine & Medical Education, Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tuomas Koskela
- Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Ana Luísa Neves
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Lars Harrysson
- Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Peter Vedsted
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Research Unit for General Practice, The Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Harris
- College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dennis LK, Hsu CH, Arrington AK. Reduction in Standard Cancer Screening in 2020 throughout the U.S. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235918. [PMID: 34885028 PMCID: PMC8656505 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer screening is an important way to reduce the burden of cancer. The COVID-19 pandemic created delays in screening with the potential to increase cancer disparities in the United States (U.S.). Data from the 2014-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey were analyzed to estimate the percentages of adults who reported cancer screening in the last 12 months consistent with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation for cervical (ages 21-65), breast (ages 50-74), and colorectal cancer (ages 50-75) prior to the pandemic. Cancer screening percentages for 2020 (April-December excluding January-March) were compared to screening percentages for 2014-2019 to begin to look at the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Screening percentages for 2020 were decreased from those for 2014-2019 including several underserved racial groups. Decreases in mammography and colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy were higher among American Indian/Alaskan Natives, Hispanics, and multiracial participants, but decreases in pap test were also highest among Hispanics, Whites, Asians, and African-Americans/Blacks. Decreases in mammograms among women ages 40-49 were also seen. As the 2020 comparison is conservative, the 2021 decreases in cancer screening are expected to be much greater and are likely to increase cancer disparities substantially.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie K. Dennis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
- Environment, Exposure Science and Risk Assessment Center, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
| | - Amanda K. Arrington
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clockston RLM, Rojas-Rueda D. Health impacts of bike-sharing systems in the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2021; 202:111709. [PMID: 34280419 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bike-sharing systems (BSS) are short-term bike rentals that can be borrowed from one location and retired to another at the conclusion of the trip. In 2019, 109,589 BSS trips were made each day in the U.S, and half of those in New York City (NYC). AIM This study aims to quantify the health risks and benefits of BSS in the U.S. and NYC. METHODS This study followed a quantitative health impact assessment approach to estimate the risks and benefits of BSS. Specifically, we quantified the health impacts of physical activity, air pollution, and traffic incidents. We analyzed all the trips made by BSS in the U.S. and NYC. Input data on transport, traffic safety, air quality, and physical activity were collated from public records and scientific publications. We modeled the health impacts on adult users related to mortality, disease incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and health economic impacts (related to morbidity and mortality). RESULTS We estimated that in the U.S. BSS trips resulted in an annual reduction of 4.7 premature deaths, 737 DALYs, and 36 million $USD in health economic impacts, mainly derived from the increment in physical activity. In NYC, we estimated an annual reduction of 2 premature deaths, 355 DALYs, and 15 million $USD in health economic impacts. CONCLUSION BSS in the U.S. and NYC provide a health benefit for bicyclists. Improvements in air quality and traffic safety across U.S. cities will maximize the health benefits of BSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raeven Lynn M Clockston
- Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA; Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
| | - David Rojas-Rueda
- Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA; Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bordonaro R, Piazza D, Sergi C, Cordio S, Tomaselli S, Gebbia V. Out-of-pocket costs in gastrointestinal cancer patients: Lack of a perfectly framed problem contributing to financial toxicity. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 167:103501. [PMID: 34673219 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Fighting cancer is an economically expensive challenge for both health care payers, and the patients and their families and the median costs for cancer care are rapidly increasing in the last decade. Although both direct and indirect costs of medical assistance have been a frequent source of distress and contention, however analysis of the non-medical expenses incurred directly by cancer patients has not received adequate attention. Developing a deeper understanding of so-called "out-of-pocket" costs may be necessary. Out-of-pocket costs for medical care range from 7 % to 11 % of medical costs for all payers. However, the range of out-of-pocket costs shows considerable variability in different studies. In this review, we reviewed available data concerning direct and indirect medical costs, including psychosocial ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Bordonaro
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e Alta Specializzazione (ARNAS), Ospedale Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
| | - Dario Piazza
- GSTU Foundation for Cancer Research, Palermo, Italy
| | - Concetta Sergi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e Alta Specializzazione (ARNAS), Ospedale Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Cordio
- Medical Oncology Unit - Azienda Ospedaliera Provinciale 7, Ragusa, Italy
| | | | - Vittorio Gebbia
- Medical Oncology and Supportive Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy; PROMISE Department - University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gigli A, Francisci S, Guzzinati S, Hall A, Hachey M, Scoppa S, Mariotto A. Cancer prevalence by phase of care: an indicator for assessing health service needs. TUMORI JOURNAL 2021; 107:311-317. [PMID: 33095121 PMCID: PMC8326901 DOI: 10.1177/0300891620961839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer prevalence (people alive on a certain date in a population who previously had a cancer diagnosis) is expected to increase in the United States and Europe due to improvements in survival and population aging. Examination of prevalence by phase of care allows us to identify subgroups of patients according to their care trajectories, thus allowing us to improve health care planning, resource allocation, and calculation of costs. METHODS A new method to estimate prevalence by phase of care using grouped data is illustrated. Prevalence is divided into 3 mutually exclusive phases: initial, continuing, and end-of-life. An application to US and Italian data is applied to prevalent cases diagnosed with colon-rectum, stomach, lung, or breast cancer. RESULTS The distribution of phase of care prevalence estimated by cancer type and sex and results from the two datasets are very similar. Most survivors are in the continuing phase; the end-of-life phase is larger for cancers with worse prognosis. All phases prevalence is generally higher in the Italian than in the US dataset, except for lung cancer in women, where prevalence proportion in the Italian dataset is 30% lower than in the United States. DISCUSSION Incidence, survival, and population age structure are the main determinants of prevalence and they can affect differences in all phases of prevalence, as well as in discrete phases. Incidence is the most influential determinant. Ours is the first study that compares prevalence by phase of care between two populations in Italy and the United States. Despite great differences in health care management in the two countries, we found extremely similar distribution of survivors by phase of care for most cancer sites under study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gigli
- Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Silvia Francisci
- National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aaron Hall
- Information Management Services, Calverton, MD, USA
| | - Mark Hachey
- Information Management Services, Calverton, MD, USA
| | - Steve Scoppa
- Information Management Services, Calverton, MD, USA
| | - Angela Mariotto
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Horicks F, Coppieters Y. [Current challenges in cancer care in Brussels-capital region: A qualitative study]. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:705-717. [PMID: 34127254 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is a disease with multidimensional consequences accompanied by new challenges in order to guarantee optimal care involving physical, psychological and social consequences of the disease and his treatments. The objective of this study is to identify the main challenges encountered by different stakeholders around cancer, including patients, in Brussels. This qualitative study was carried out with various stakeholders in the field of oncology. The semi-structured interviews and focus groups were transcribed directly and the data collected was analysed manually. Healthcare professionals and patients face many challenges in the current context of oncology care. Communication difficulties can affect the therapeutic relationship and the sharing of complex information. The increasing complexity of therapeutic strategies complicates interprofessional collaborations and care coordination. In a context of early return home and home hospitalization in particular, continuity in care and collaboration between the different lines of care are crucial. Patients face a variety of challenges, such as managing long-term side effects and post-cancer difficulties, including redefining their social and professional identities. Finally, cancer involves financial toxicity and social inequalities in health are particularly marked. Cancer is a complex disease which management involves a growing number of caretakers. It is also frequently synonymous with disruption in the personal, social and professional life of patients. The emerging themes of this study are closely interconnected and communication seems to occupy a central place. A holistic approach to the individual and inter-professional interactions could guide future prospects for the overall management of this constantly changing field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Horicks
- Centre de recherche Politiques et systèmes de santé, École de Santé Publique, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), route de Lennik 808, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique.
| | - Yves Coppieters
- Centre de recherche Politiques et systèmes de santé, École de Santé Publique, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), route de Lennik 808, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Robinson JRM, Phipps AI, Barrington WE, Hurvitz PM, Sheppard L, Malen RC, Newcomb PA. Associations of Household Income with Health-Related Quality of Life Following a Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Varies With Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1366-1374. [PMID: 33947657 PMCID: PMC8254776 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing evidence indicates household income as a predictor of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following a colorectal cancer diagnosis. This association likely varies with neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), but evidence is limited. METHODS We included data from 1,355 colorectal cancer survivors participating in the population-based Puget Sound Colorectal Cancer Cohort (PSCCC). Survivors reported current annual household income; we measured HRQoL via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (FACT-C) tool. Using neighborhood data summarized within a 1-km radial buffer of Census block group centroids, we constructed a multidimensional nSES index measure. We employed survivors' geocoded residential addresses to append nSES score for Census block group of residence. With linear generalized estimating equations clustered on survivor location, we evaluated associations of household income with differences in FACT-C mean score, overall and stratified by nSES. We used separate models to explore relationships for wellbeing subscales. RESULTS We found lower household income to be associated with clinically meaningful differences in overall FACT-C scores [<$30K: -13.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): -16.8 to -10.4] and subscale wellbeing after a recent colorectal cancer diagnosis. Relationships were slightly greater in magnitude for survivors living in lower SES neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that recently diagnosed lower income colorectal cancer survivors are likely to report lower HRQoL, and modestly more so in lower SES neighborhoods. IMPACT The findings from this work will aid future investigators' ability to further consider the contexts in which the income of survivors can be leveraged as a means of improving HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamaica R M Robinson
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York. .,Columbia Population Research Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Amanda I Phipps
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Cancer Epidemiology, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Wendy E Barrington
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Philip M Hurvitz
- Urban Form Lab, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lianne Sheppard
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rachel C Malen
- Cancer Prevention, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Polly A Newcomb
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Cancer Prevention, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Doble B, Wong WHM, Finkelstein E. End-of-life cost trajectories and the trade-off between treatment costs and life-extension: Findings from the Cost and Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness (COMPASS) cohort study. Palliat Med 2021; 35:893-903. [PMID: 33730947 DOI: 10.1177/0269216321999576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have assessed how patient preferences influence end-of-life costs. AIM To estimate mean monthly healthcare costs in 2019 Singapore Dollars (SGD) at five time points within the last year of life and identify how patients' preferences for the trade-off between treatment cost containment and life-extension and other factors affect these costs. DESIGN Mean monthly costs were quantified in the last 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months before death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Billing records for 286 deceased participants in the Cost and Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness (COMPASS) cancer cohort study in Singapore. RESULTS Mean monthly costs were $5140 (95% CI: $4750; $5520) in the 12-months before death and rose to $8350 (95% CI: $7110; $9590) 1-month before death. Participants preferring higher cost containment/less life-extension defied the trend of increasing costs closer to death (mean monthly costs of $4630 (95% CI: $3690; $ 5580) and $4850 (95% CI: $2850; $6850) (12-months and 1-month before death respectively). Participants preferring lower cost containment/more life-extension had costs that were $1050 (95% CI: $49; $2051) and $5220 (95% CI: $2320; $8130) higher than those preferring lower costs/less life-extension 12-months and 1-month before death respectively. CONCLUSIONS On average, cancer patients in Singapore can expect to spend $61,680 in the last year of life. Of broader relevance is that patient preferences and other observable factors clearly influence these costs, suggesting that policymakers and patients can better predict and budget for end-of-life costs by considering these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Doble
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Programme for Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Wei Han Melvin Wong
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Programme for Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Programme for Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bona LG, Geleta D, Dulla D, Deribe B, Ayalew M, Ababi G, Bogale N, Mengistu K, Gadissa A, Gebretsadik A. Economic Burden of Cancer on Cancer Patients Treated at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211009252. [PMID: 33858225 PMCID: PMC8204646 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211009252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer causes the highest economic loss of all of the leading 15 causes of death
worldwide. The economic loss includes the loss of income and the expenses
associated with health care costs. The Low awareness of the community toward
cancer, the inadequacy of professionals and service providers, and the high
budget consuming nature of the treatments are creating a great burden on the
cancer patients. The objective of this study was to calculate patient side
cancer treatment cost and to assess the contributing factors, among the cancer
patients who were treated at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized
Hospital. The health facility based cross-sectional study design was employed
using a consecutive sampling technique. Questionnaires was used to collect
primary data; while chart was used to collect the secondary data. Indirect costs
incurred on these patients due to off job days were checked. Descriptive and
inferential statistics were applied to illustrate the data. On average, $209.99
was spent on treatment by each cancer patients. Of these, medication cost is the
highest ($20.77, IQR = 0.53-112.56) from the direct medical costs, and
transportation cost is the highest ($58.33, IQR = 22.0-131.67) from the indirect
medical costs. Inpatients paid $245.16 (IQR = 147.64-439.20); while outpatients
paid $147.37 (IQR = 81.42-240.50). The patients lose about 55.99% of their
average annual income. Outpatients pay $0, 92 less than in patients
(P = 0.00, CI -0.72-0.34), and the cost increases by $0.2
for the patients who came from Oromia. The cost of transportation and medication
were the one which were significantly affecting the burden; but the total cost
of treatment was lesser when compared to similar studies done in different
areas. The cost balances toward the patients who came from the Oromiya region.
Treatment service has to be extended to West Arsi Zone to minimize the cost of
transportation and awareness about cancer is needed in the first place and due
attention has to be given to thyroid cancer. Furthermore, facility side study
should be done to see the complete picture of the burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalisa Gemechu Bona
- Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Dereje Geleta
- School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Dubale Dulla
- Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Bedilu Deribe
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Ayalew
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Girma Ababi
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Netsanet Bogale
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Kurabachew Mengistu
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Anteneh Gadissa
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| | - Achamyelesh Gebretsadik
- School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, 128167Hawassa University, Hawassa, SNNPR, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ngcamphalala C, Östensson E, Ginindza TG. The economic burden of cervical cancer in Eswatini: Societal perspective. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250113. [PMID: 33857233 PMCID: PMC8049330 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer imposes considerable economic burden on societies and individuals. There is lack of evidence regarding this from the developing world and particularly from sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, the study aimed to estimate the societal costs of cervical cancer in Eswatini. Materials and methods The cost of illness study (CoI) was applied using national specific clinical and registry data from hospitals, registries and reports to determine the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer in Eswatini in 2018. Cost data included direct medical costs (health care utilization in inpatient and outpatient care), direct non-medical costs (patient costs for traveling) and indirect costs based on productivity loss due to morbidity (patient time during diagnosis and treatment) and premature mortality. Results The estimated total annual cost for cervical cancer was $19 million (ranging between $14 million and $24 million estimated with lower and upper bounds). Direct cost represented the majority of the costs at 72% ($13.7 million) out of which total pre-cancerous treatment costs accounted for 0.7% ($94,161). The management of invasive cervical cancer was the main cost driver with costs attributable to treatment for FIGO III and FIGO IV representing $1.7 million and $8.7 million respectively. Indirect costs contributed 27% ($5.3 million) out of which productivity loss due to premature mortality represented the majority at 67% ($3.5 million). Conclusion The economic burden of cervical cancer in Eswatini is substantial. National public health prevention strategies with prophylactic HPV vaccine and screening for cervical lesions should therefore be prioritized to limit the extensive costs associated with cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cebisile Ngcamphalala
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| | - Ellinor Östensson
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Themba G. Ginindza
- Discipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Meernik C, Sandler DP, Peipins LA, Hodgson ME, Blinder VS, Wheeler SB, Nichols HB. Breast Cancer-Related Employment Disruption and Financial Hardship in the Sister Study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab024. [PMID: 34104865 PMCID: PMC8178802 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background More than one-half of breast cancer cases are diagnosed among women aged younger than 62 years, which may result in employment challenges. This study examined whether cancer-related employment disruption was associated with increased financial hardship in a national US study of women with breast cancer. Methods Women with breast cancer who were enrolled in the Sister or Two Sister Studies completed a survivorship survey in 2012. Employment disruption was defined as stopping work completely or working fewer hours after diagnosis. Financial hardship was defined as: 1) experiencing financial problems paying for cancer care, 2) borrowing money or incurring debt, or 3) filing for bankruptcy because of cancer. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between employment disruption and financial hardship were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance. Results We analyzed data from women employed at diagnosis (n = 1628). Women were a median age of 48 years at diagnosis and 5.6 years from diagnosis at survey completion. Overall, 27.3% of women reported employment disruption (15.4% stopped working; 11.9% reduced hours), and 21.0% experienced financial hardship (16.0% had difficulty paying for care; 12.6% borrowed money or incurred debt; 1.8% filed for bankruptcy). In adjusted analysis, employment disruption was associated with nearly twice the prevalence of financial hardship (prevalence ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 1.58 to 2.35). Conclusions Women experiencing employment disruptions after breast cancer may be more vulnerable to financial hardship. Findings highlight the need to target risk factors for employment disruption, facilitate return to work or ongoing employment, and mitigate financial consequences after cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Meernik
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lucy A Peipins
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Victoria S Blinder
- Department of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ibarrondo O, Lizeaga G, Martínez-Llorente JM, Larrañaga I, Soto-Gordoa M, Álvarez-López I. Health care costs of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer care by clinical stage and cost component. GACETA SANITARIA 2021; 36:246-252. [PMID: 33612313 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure 3-year care costs of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancers disaggregated by site and clinical stage. METHOD A retrospective observational design was employed to investigate care costs of cases recorded in the Registry of the Basque Country between 2010 and 2015. Data gathered included TNM stage and demographic, clinical and resource use variables. Total costs per patient with stage IV disease were calculated by combining generalized linear models with parametric survival analysis. Unit costs were obtained from the analytical accounting system of the Basque Health Service. RESULTS The sample comprised 23,782 cancer cases (7801 colorectal, 5530 breast, 4802 prostate and 5649 lung cancer). The mean 3-year costs per patient with stage I to III disease were €11,323, €13,727, €8,651 and €12,023 for colorectal, breast, prostate and lung cancer, respectively. The most important cost components were surgery and chemotherapy. Total survival-adjusted costs until death for patients with stage IV disease (€27,568, €26,296, €16,151 and €15,931 for breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer, respectively) were higher than the 3-year costs for those with earlier-stage disease. CONCLUSIONS This study quantitatively shows the pattern of changes in the economic burden of cancer throughout its natural history and the great magnitude of this burden for the health system. The use of indicators based on real-world data from each regional health service would allow cancer care in each region to be tailored to local population needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Ibarrondo
- Basque Health Service (Osakidetza), Debagoiena Integrated Healthcare Organisation, Research Unit, Arrasate-Mondragón, Gipuzkoa, Spain; Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; RS-Statistics, Arrasate-Mondragón, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
| | - Garbiñe Lizeaga
- Basque Health Service (Osakidetza), Donostia University Hospital, Pharmacy Services, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - José Miguel Martínez-Llorente
- Basque Health Service (Osakidetza), Debagoiena Integrated Healthcare Organisation, Accounting Department, Arrasate-Mondragón, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Igor Larrañaga
- Kronikgune Institute for Health Service Research, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Myriam Soto-Gordoa
- Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Faculty of Engineering, Arrasate-Mondragón, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Isabel Álvarez-López
- Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; RS-Statistics, Arrasate-Mondragón, Gipuzkoa, Spain; Basque Health Service (Osakidetza), Donostia University Hospital, Medical Oncology Service, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Developing a Value Framework: Utilizing Administrative Data to Assess an Enhanced Care Initiative. J Surg Res 2021; 262:115-120. [PMID: 33561722 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains no tool to quantify the total value of comparative processes in health care. Hospital administrative data sets are emerging as valuable sources to evaluate performance. Thus, we use a framework to simultaneously assess multiple domains of value associated with an enhanced recovery initiative using national administrative data. MATERIALS AND METHODS Risk-stratified clinical pathways for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery were implemented in 2016 at our institution. We used a national administrative database to characterize changes in value associated with this initiative. Value metrics assessed included in-hospital mortality, complication rates, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and institutional costs. We compared our performance with other hospitals both before and after implementation of the pathways. Metrics were graphed on radar charts to assess overall value. RESULTS 22,660 cases were assessed. Comparing 75 cases at our institution and 5520 cases at all other hospitals before pathway implementation, mean in-hospital LOS was 9.6 versus 10.8 d, in-hospital mortality was 0.0% versus 1.9%, mean costs were $23,585 versus $21,387, 30-day readmission rates were 1.3% versus 7.4%, and complication rates were 8.0% versus 11.2%, respectively. Comparing 334 cases at our institution and 16,731 cases at all other hospitals after pathway implementation, mean in-hospital LOS was 7.7 versus 10.3 d, in-hospital mortality was 0.3% versus 1.6%, mean costs were $19,428 versus $22,032, 30-day readmission rates were 6.6% versus 7.5%, and complication rates were 6.3% versus 10.3%, respectively. Notably, LOS and institutional costs were reduced at our institution after implementation of the enhanced clinical care pathways. Our costs were higher than comparators before implementation, but lower than comparators after implementation. CONCLUSIONS Herein, we used an analytic framework and used national administrative data to assess the value of an enhanced care initiative as benchmarked with data from other hospitals. We thus illustrate how to identify and measure opportunities for targeted improvements in health care delivery. We also recognize the limitations of the use of administrative data in a comprehensive assessment of value in health care.
Collapse
|
48
|
Staehler MD, Battle DJ, Bergerot CD, Pal SK, Penson DF. COVID-19 and financial toxicity in patients with renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2020; 39:2559-2565. [PMID: 33090258 PMCID: PMC7578440 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03476-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To ascertain renal cell carcinoma (RCC) financial toxicity on COVID-19 during the COVID-19 crisis as patients are struggling with therapeutic and financial implications. Methods An online survey was conducted from March 22 to March 25, 2020. It included baseline demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment-related information, anxiety levels related to COVID-19, questions related to financial concerns about COVID-19 as well as the validated 11-item COST measure. Results Five-hundred-and-thirty-nine patients (39%:58% male:female) from 14 countries responded. 23% of the patients did not feel in control of their financial situation but 8% reported being very satisfied with their finances. The median COST score was 21.5 (range 1–44). Metastatic patients who have not started systemic therapy had a COST score (19.8 range 2–41) versus patients on oral systemic therapy had a COST score (23.9 range 4–44). Patients in follow-up after surgery had a median COST score at 20.8 (range 1–40). A low COST scores correlated (p < 0.001) were female gender (r = 0.108), younger age (r = 0.210), urban living situation (r = 0.68), a lower educational level (r = 0.155), lower income (r = 0.165), higher anxiety about acquiring COVID-19 (r = 0.198), having metastatic disease (r = 0.073) and a higher distress score about cancer progression (r = 0.224). Conclusion Our data highlight severe financial impact of COVID-19. Acknowledging financial hardship and thorough counseling of cancer patients should be part of the conversation during the pandemic. Treatment and surveillance of RCC patients might have to be adjusted to contemplate financial and medical needs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03476-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Staehler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Dena J Battle
- Kidney Cancer Research Alliance (KCCure), Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Cristiane D Bergerot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sumanta Kumar Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kircher SM, Mulcahy M, Kalyan A, Weldon CB, Trosman JR, Benson AB. Telemedicine in Oncology and Reimbursement Policy During COVID-19 and Beyond. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 19:1-7. [PMID: 32998106 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The first confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States was reported on January 20, 2020. As of September 17, 2020, there were more than 6.6 million confirmed cases and 196,277 deaths. Limited data are available on outcomes of immunocompromised patients, but early published reports from China indicate that those with cancer have a 3.5 times higher risk of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or death than those without cancer. Because of the uncertain behavior of COVID-19, it has become imperative for practices to limit exposure to vulnerable patients. Telemedicine has been one of the cornerstones of caring for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review provides an overview of reimbursement policy by public and private payers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, describes implications in cancer care, and offers considerations for future reimbursement policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheetal M Kircher
- 1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago
- 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; and
| | - Mary Mulcahy
- 1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago
- 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; and
| | - Aparna Kalyan
- 1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago
- 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; and
| | - Christine B Weldon
- 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; and
- 3Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, Illinois
| | - Julia R Trosman
- 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; and
- 3Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, Illinois
| | - Al B Benson
- 1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago
- 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; and
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mariotto AB, Enewold L, Zhao J, Zeruto CA, Yabroff KR. Medical Care Costs Associated with Cancer Survivorship in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1304-1312. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|