1
|
McCracken C, Condurache DG, Szabo L, Elghazaly H, Walter FM, Mead AJ, Chakraverty R, Harvey NC, Manisty CH, Petersen SE, Neubauer S, Raisi-Estabragh Z. Predictive Performance of Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Cancer Survivors From the UK Biobank. JACC CardioOncol 2024; 6:575-588. [PMID: 39239345 PMCID: PMC11372025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular preventive strategies are guided by risk scores with unknown validity in cancer cohorts. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of 7 established cardiovascular risk scores in cancer survivors from the UK Biobank. Methods The predictive performance of QRISK3, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2)/Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation for Older Persons (SCORE-OP), Framingham Risk Score, Pooled Cohort equations to Prevent Heart Failure (PCP-HF), CHARGE-AF, QStroke, and CHA2DS2-VASc was calculated in participants with and without a history of cancer. Participants were propensity matched on age, sex, deprivation, health behaviors, family history, and metabolic conditions. Analyses were stratified into any cancer, breast, lung, prostate, brain/central nervous system, hematologic malignancies, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Incident cardiovascular events were tracked through health record linkage over 10 years of follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity were reported. Results The analysis included 31,534 cancer survivors and 126,136 covariate-matched controls. Risk score distributions were near identical in cases and controls. Participants with any cancer had a significantly higher incidence of all cardiovascular outcomes than matched controls. Performance metrics were significantly worse for all risk scores in cancer cases than in matched controls. The most notable differences were among participants with a history of hematologic malignancies who had significantly higher outcome rates and poorer risk score performance than their matched controls. The performance of risk scores for predicting stroke in participants with brain/central nervous system cancer was very poor, with predictive accuracy more than 30% lower than noncancer controls. Conclusions Existing cardiovascular risk scores have significantly worse predictive accuracy in cancer survivors compared with noncancer comparators, leading to an underestimation of risk in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste McCracken
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Dorina-Gabriela Condurache
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- William Harvey Research Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Liliana Szabo
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- William Harvey Research Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Hussein Elghazaly
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College London and Imperial College NHS Trust, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Adam J Mead
- Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ronjon Chakraverty
- Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte H Manisty
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steffen E Petersen
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- William Harvey Research Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
- Health Data Research UK, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Neubauer
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Zahra Raisi-Estabragh
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- William Harvey Research Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Williams KP, Lin CJ, Felix AS, Addison D, Sheppard VB, Sutton AL, Mumma MT, Im W, Juarez PD, Hood DB. The association between cardiovascular disease and breast and gynecologic cancers among black female patients. J Natl Med Assoc 2023; 115:466-474. [PMID: 37558599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Little is known about whether a breast or gynecologic cancer diagnosis increases long-term cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among Black females. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a breast or gynecologic cancer diagnosis is associated with CVD risk and identify determinants of subsequent CVD risk among Black females with an incident breast or gynecologic cancer diagnosis. METHODS Using the Southern Community Cohort Study data from 2002-2016, this study was designed to analyze CVD incidence among Black females without cancer or CVD at enrollment. Cox proportional hazards regression models with or without covariates were used to explore the relationship between a breast or gynecologic cancer diagnosis and CVD risk among women without cancer as well as without CVD at enrollment (N=11,486). In addition, Cox proportional hazards regression models, excluding those who developed CVD before breast and gynecologic cancer diagnosis and those with other types of cancers, were used to assess determinants of CVD risk among breast and gynecologic cancer survivors. RESULTS Of 11,486 Black females, 531 developed a breast or gynecological cancer (4.6%) over a median follow-up of 140 months (interquartile range: 123-159 months). Compared to women without cancer, women with a breast or gynecological cancers had greater than 20% higher risk of incident CVD during the follow-up period. Without adjusting for covariates, positive association between CVD risk and breast cancer was observed (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11 - 1.39; p < 0.001); as well as between CVD risk and a gynecological cancer (HR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.03 - 1.46; p = 0.021). Yet, after adjusting for covariates, CVD risk was only significantly associated with breast cancer (p = 0.001) but not gynecologic cancer. In cancer case-only analyses, CVD risk was significantly increasing with age (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Like study populations of predominantly White females, our results suggest that, adjusting for covariates, Black females possess a higher risk of CVD following a breast cancer diagnosis compared to women who did not develop breast cancer. Our results suggest a need for active CVD surveillance in the cancer survivorship phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Patricia Williams
- Martha S. Pitzer Center for Women, Children, and Youth, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
| | - Chyongchiou J Lin
- Martha S. Pitzer Center for Women, Children, and Youth, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Ashley S Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Daniel Addison
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, V.B. Sheppard and A.L. Sutton, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, V.B. Sheppard and A.L. Sutton, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Michael T Mumma
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Wansoo Im
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Paul D Juarez
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Darryl B Hood
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 73:e34-e42. [PMID: 36443065 PMCID: PMC9710863 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular risks are raised in cancer survivors but cancer history is not included in cardiovascular risk scores that inform preventive decisions. AIM To assess whether cancer diagnosis should be included in cardiovascular risk scores. DESIGN AND SETTING Cohort study using data from English general practices linked to hospital, cancer registration, and death registration data from 1990 to 2015. METHOD Adults alive 1 year after a first cancer diagnosis and age, sex, general practice, and calendar- time matched cancer-free individuals were included. Individuals with <2 years of follow-up before index, recent statin prescriptions, or pre-existing coronary heart or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models used to develop QRISK3 scores were replicated with added cancer history variables. Whether independent hazard ratios for these variables met thresholds for inclusion in QRISK3 (>10% relative difference with P<0.01) was assessed. RESULTS In total, 81 420 cancer survivors and 413 547 cancer-free individuals were followed for a median 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8- 9.1) and 6.3 years (IQR 3.5-10.2), respectively. Including a 1-year cancer survivorship variable in a QRISK3-based model met the threshold for inclusion for males (independent hazard ratio [iHR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.20, P<0.001) but not females (iHR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14, P = 0.02). When including cancer type, the threshold was met for both sexes with history of haematological cancer (males: iHR 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.40, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32 to 1.91, P<0.001) and for males but not females with history of solid cancers (males: iHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.18, P <0.001; females: iHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.10, P = 0.19). CONCLUSION Developers should consider including cancer history variables in future cardiovascular risk models.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhir AA, Sawant SP. Cardiac morbidity & mortality in patients with breast cancer: A review. Indian J Med Res 2021; 154:199-209. [PMID: 35295010 PMCID: PMC9131763 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_879_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and breast cancer cause substantial morbidity and mortality in women and are major public health concerns. Breast cancer survivors are at a greater risk for CVD-related mortality compared to women without breast cancer. Breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases share a number of common risk factors. Breast cancer treatments like anthracycline based chemotherapy, novel targeted therapy and radiation therapy can cause cardiotoxicity. With improvements in breast cancer prevention and treatment, there is a significant improvement in survival and this shifts focus from disease control to long term effects of treatment and quality of life. Assessing CVD and minimizing complications from cancer therapy are important treatment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Alahari Dhir
- Department of Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang X, Pawlikowski M, Olivo-Marston S, Williams KP, Bower JK, Felix AS. Ten-year cardiovascular risk among cancer survivors: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247919. [PMID: 33661978 PMCID: PMC7932508 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivors have a higher risk of developing and dying from cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. We sought to determine whether 10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) is elevated among those with vs. without a cancer history in a nationally representative U.S. sample. METHODS Participants aged 40-79 years with no CVD history were included from the 2007-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cancer history was self-reported and 10-year risk of ASCVD was estimated using Pooled Cohort Equations. We used logistic regression to estimate associations between cancer history and odds of elevated (≥7.5%) vs. low (<7.5%) 10-year ASCVD risk. An interaction between age and cancer history was examined. RESULTS A total of 15,095 participants were included (mean age = 55.2 years) with 12.3% (n = 1,604) reporting a cancer history. Individuals with vs. without a cancer history had increased odds of elevated 10-year ASCVD risk (OR = 3.42, 95% CI: 2.51-4.66). Specifically, those with bladder/kidney, prostate, colorectal, lung, melanoma, or testicular cancer had a 2.72-10.47 higher odds of elevated 10-year ASCVD risk. Additionally, age was an effect modifier: a cancer history was associated with 1.24 (95% CI: 1.19-4.21) times higher odds of elevated 10-year ASCVD risk among those aged 60-69, but not with other age groups. CONCLUSIONS Adults with a history of self-reported cancer had higher 10-year ASCVD risk. ASCVD risk assessment and clinical surveillance of cardiovascular health following a cancer diagnosis could potentially reduce disease burden and prolong survival, especially for patients with specific cancers and high ASCVD risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochen Zhang
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Division of Population Sciences, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Meghan Pawlikowski
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Susan Olivo-Marston
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Karen Patricia Williams
- Martha S. Pitzer Center for Women, Children, and Youth, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Julie K. Bower
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Ashley S. Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hu Q, Chang CP, Rowe K, Snyder J, Deshmukh V, Newman M, Fraser A, Smith K, Gren LH, Porucznik C, Stanford JB, Gaffney D, Henry NL, Lopez I, Hashibe M. Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Hispanic Breast Cancer Survivors in a Population-Based Cohort. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab016. [PMID: 33889806 PMCID: PMC8052955 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women. The aim of our study was to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White (NHW) breast cancer survivors compared with their respective general population cohorts. Methods Cohorts of 17 469 breast cancer survivors (1774 Hispanic and 15 695 NHW) in the Utah Cancer Registry diagnosed between 1997 and 2016, and 65 866 women (6209 Hispanic and 59 657 NHW) from the general population in the Utah Population Database were identified. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD. Results The risk of diseases of the circulatory system was higher in Hispanic than NHW breast cancer survivors 1-5 years after cancer diagnosis, in comparison with their respective general population cohorts (HRHispanic = 1.94, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49 to 2.53; HNHW = 1.38, 99% CI = 1.33 to 1.43; 2-sided Pheterogeneity = .01, respectively). Increased risks were observed for both Hispanic and NHW breast cancer survivors for diseases of the heart and the veins and lymphatics, compared with the general population cohorts. More than 5 years after cancer diagnosis, elevated risk of diseases of the veins and lymphatics persisted in both ethnicities. The CVD risk due to chemotherapy and hormone therapy was higher in Hispanic than NHW breast cancer survivors but did not differ for distant stage, higher baseline comorbidities, or baseline smoking. Conclusions We observed a risk difference for diseases of the circulatory system between Hispanic and NHW breast cancer survivors compared with their respective general population cohorts but only within the first 5 years of cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingqing Hu
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chun-Pin Chang
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kerry Rowe
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John Snyder
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vikrant Deshmukh
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael Newman
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alison Fraser
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ken Smith
- Pedigree and Population Resource, Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lisa H Gren
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Christina Porucznik
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Joseph B Stanford
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David Gaffney
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ivette Lopez
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Utah Cancer Registry, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coughlin SS, Ayyala D, Majeed B, Cortes L, Kapuku G. Cardiovascular Disease among Breast Cancer Survivors. CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDER AND MEDICINE 2020; 2. [PMID: 32661518 PMCID: PMC7357874 DOI: 10.31487/j.cdm.2020.01.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Among breast cancer survivors age > 50 years, deaths due to cardiovascular disease account for 35% of non-cancer related deaths. The increases in cardiovascular disease among breast cancer survivors is due to the cardiotoxic effects of breast cancer treatment and to overlapping risk factors for breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. Methods We conducted a study of a sample of 164 breast cancer patients in order to examine the frequency of cardiovascular disease. The overall objective was to examine the frequency of high blood pressure, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, stroke, and venous thrombosis/thromboembolism among women who have been diagnosed with stage I-IV breast cancer and who had completed primary therapy for the disease. Data were collected by postal survey and abstraction of electronic medical records. Results A high percentage of the women (62.8%) had a reported history of high blood pressure. Fifty percent of the women had a reported history of high cholesterol. About 8.3% of the women were current smokers and 36.0% were former smokers. About 23.8% of the women had a reported history of diabetes. About 4.9% of the women had a reported history of congestive heart failure and 6.1% had a history of stroke. Discussion Additional studies are needed of cardiovascular risk factors and adverse cardiovascular events among breast cancer survivors. Of particular concern is whether patients with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes are receiving appropriate therapy to reduce their cardiovascular risk and prevent morbidity and mortality from adverse cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven S Coughlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.,Institute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Deepak Ayyala
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Ban Majeed
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Letisia Cortes
- Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Gaston Kapuku
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have started revolutionizing the treatment of numerous advanced oncological diseases by restoring immune resistance against cancer cells. ICI-associated cardiac adverse effects are rare, but severe. About 50% of cardiac complications comprise myocarditis with variable clinical presentation and a high rate of fatality. The pathomechanism is incompletely understood and may involve preexisting autoimmunity such as autoantibodies or common epitopes shared by cardiomyocytes and tumor cells. Especially patients at risk might be followed up by serial troponin measurements in order to allow an early identification of ICI-associated myocarditis. Therapeutic options are limited and consist of early discontinuation of ICI treatment and initiation of an immunosuppression. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanism, define diagnostic criteria, improve surveillance of patients at risk, and finally refine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Müller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Martina E Spehlmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|