1
|
Bischoff H, Espié M, Petit T. Neoadjuvant Therapy: Current Landscape and Future Horizons for ER-Positive/HER2-Negative and Triple-Negative Early Breast Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024:10.1007/s11864-024-01251-y. [PMID: 39145854 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01251-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Navigating the complex landscape of breast cancer treatment involves distinct strategies for luminal and triple-negative subtypes. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy historically dominates the approach for aggressive triple-negative tumors, recent evidence highlights the transformative impact of immunotherapy, alongside chemotherapy, in reshaping treatment paradigms. In luminal cancers, endocrine therapy, notably aromatase inhibitors, demonstrates promising outcomes in postmenopausal patients with low-grade luminal A tumors. However, integrating targeted therapies like CDK4/6 inhibitors in neoadjuvant setting remains inconclusive. Identifying predictive factors for treatment response, especially in luminal tumors, poses a challenge, emphasizing the necessity for ongoing research. A multidisciplinary approach, tailored to individual patient profiles, is crucial for maximizing efficacy while minimizing toxicity. As we strive to optimize breast cancer management, a comprehensive understanding of the distinct characteristics and treatment implications of luminal and triple-negative subtypes, including the transformative role of immunotherapy, is essential for informed decision-making and personalized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hervé Bischoff
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Marc Espié
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67033, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang X, Vladmirovich RI, Georgievna PM, Sergeevna AY, He M, Zeng Z, Qiang Y, Cao Y, Sergeevich KT. Personalized chemotherapy selection for patients with triple-negative breast cancer using deep learning. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1418800. [PMID: 38966532 PMCID: PMC11222643 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1418800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Potential uncertainties and overtreatment exist in adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Objectives This study aims to explore the performance of deep learning (DL) models in personalized chemotherapy selection and quantify the impact of baseline characteristics on treatment efficacy. Methods Patients who received treatment recommended by models were compared to those who did not. Overall survival for treatment according to model recommendations was the primary outcome. To mitigate bias, inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed. A mixed-effect multivariate linear regression was employed to visualize the influence of certain baseline features of patients on chemotherapy selection. Results A total of 10,070 female TNBC patients met the inclusion criteria. Treatment according to Self-Normalizing Balanced (SNB) individual treatment effect for survival data model recommendations was associated with a survival benefit (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.32-8.60; IPTW-adjusted risk difference: 12.90, 95% CI, 6.99-19.01; IPTW-adjusted the difference in restricted mean survival time: 5.54, 95% CI, 1.36-8.61), which surpassed other models and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. No survival benefit for chemotherapy was seen for patients not recommended to receive this treatment. SNB predicted older patients with larger tumors and more positive lymph nodes are the optimal candidates for chemotherapy. Conclusion These findings suggest that the SNB model may identify patients with TNBC who could benefit from chemotherapy. This novel analytical approach may provide debiased individual survival information and treatment recommendations. Further research is required to validate these models in clinical settings with more features and outcome measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Yang
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Mingze He
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zitong Zeng
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Yinpeng Qiang
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu Cao
- Department of Faculty Surgery No. 2, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carbajal-Ochoa W, Bravo-Solarte DC, Bernal AM, Anampa JD. Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative, T1b and T1c triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:257-269. [PMID: 37833449 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07132-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current guidelines recommendations regarding chemotherapy in small (T1b and T1c), node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) differ due to lack of high-quality data. Our study aimed to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T1bN0M0 and T1cN0M0 TNBC. METHODS We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with node-negative, T1b/T1c TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020. Logistic regresion models assessed variables associated with chemotherapy administration. We evaluated the effect of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS We included 11,510 patients: 3,388 with T1b and 8,122 with T1c TNBC. During a median follow-up of 66 months, 305 patients with T1b and 995 with T1c died. After adjusting for clinicopathological, demographic and treatment factors, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS in T1b TNBC (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.68 p < 0.001) but did not improve BCSS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; p = 0.10); the association between chemotherapy and BCSS was not statistically significant in any subgroup. In T1c TNBC, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.62; p < 0.001) and BCSS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99; p = 0.043); the benefit of chemotherapy in OS varied by age (Pinteraction=0.024); moreover, the benefit in BCSS was similar in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Our study results support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, T1c TNBC. Patients with node-negative, T1b TNBC had excellent long-term outcomes; furthermore, chemotherapy was not associated with improved BCSS in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Carbajal-Ochoa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology/Josep Trueta Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Ana M Bernal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1695 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Jesus D Anampa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1695 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bravo-Solarte DC, Zhang F, Anampa JD. Assessment of Use and Impact of Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-Negative, T1a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:763-773.e6. [PMID: 37648557 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current treatment guidelines suggest considering adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients with T1a, node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, limited quality data support this statement. Our population-based study assessed the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and factors associated with its administration in node-negative, T1a TNBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with T1aN0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. We utilized the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model to analyze the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in chemotherapy benefit. We performed stratified models to identify differences in OS and BCSS between those who received chemotherapy and those who did not across subgroups. Competing risk analysis was conducted to assess differences in risk of breast cancer death in patients with chemotherapy administration versus no chemotherapy. Additionally, propensity score matching was executed to assess survival analysis in a matched cohort. RESULTS We included 1739 patients with T1a TNBC. Patients who received chemotherapy were younger, had higher histological grade and ductal histology subtype, were more likely to be married and undergo mastectomy. Our study did not show improvement in OS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.13; P = .122) or BCSS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.37-2.43; P = .908) after chemotherapy use. We did not identify any subgroup of patients that may benefit from chemotherapy. Without chemotherapy, 8-year risk of breast cancer death is 2.75% for these patients. CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with benefit on OS or BCSS in node-negative, T1a TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ayala de la Peña F, Antolín Novoa S, Gavilá Gregori J, González Cortijo L, Henao Carrasco F, Martínez Martínez MT, Morales Estévez C, Stradella A, Vidal Losada MJ, Ciruelos E. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2647-2664. [PMID: 37326826 PMCID: PMC10425528 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03215-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women in Spain and its annual incidence is rapidly increasing. Thanks to the screening programs in place, nearly 90% of breast cancer cases are detected in early and potentially curable stages, despite the COVID-19 pandemic possibly having impacted these numbers (not yet quantified). In recent years, locoregional and systemic therapies are increasingly being directed by new diagnostic tools that have improved the balance between toxicity and clinical benefit. New therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, targeted drugs, and antibody-drug conjugates have also improved outcomes in some patient subgroups. This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review of relevant studies and on the consensus of experts from GEICAM, SOLTI, and SEOM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Ayala de la Peña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital G. Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, Av. Marqués de los Vélez, s/n, 30008, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Silvia Antolín Novoa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, A Coruña (CHUAC), Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | | | - María Teresa Martínez Martínez
- Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico of Valencia, University of Valencia, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Agostina Stradella
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia. L'Hospitalet,, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Eva Ciruelos
- Medical Oncology Department, Breast Cancer Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain and HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Joshi U, Budhathoki P, Gaire S, Yadav SK, Shah A, Adhikari A, Choong G, Couzi R, Giridhar KV, Leon-Ferre RA, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Mutter R, Ruddy KJ, Haddad TC, Goetz MP, Couch FJ, Yadav S. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 200:217-224. [PMID: 37210429 PMCID: PMC10782581 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06959-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. METHODS Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p = 0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utsav Joshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, 14621, USA
| | - Pravash Budhathoki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA
| | - Suman Gaire
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
| | - Sumeet K Yadav
- Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Mankato, MN, 56001, USA
| | - Anish Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA
| | - Anurag Adhikari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Grace Choong
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Rima Couzi
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | | | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Robert Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tufia C Haddad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han C, Pan Y, Liu C, Yang X, Li J, Wang K, Sun Z, Liu H, Jin G, Fang F, Pan X, Tang T, Chen X, Pang S, Ma L, Wang X, Ren Y, Liu M, Liu F, Jiang M, Zhao J, Lu C, Lu Z, Gao D, Jiang Z, Pei J. Assessing the decision quality of artificial intelligence and oncologists of different experience in different regions in breast cancer treatment. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1152013. [PMID: 37361565 PMCID: PMC10289408 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background AI-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) has important prospects in overcoming the current informational challenges that cancer diseases faced, promoting the homogeneous development of standardized treatment among different geographical regions, and reforming the medical model. However, there are still a lack of relevant indicators to comprehensively assess its decision-making quality and clinical impact, which greatly limits the development of its clinical research and clinical application. This study aims to develop and application an assessment system that can comprehensively assess the decision-making quality and clinical impacts of physicians and CDSS. Methods Enrolled adjuvant treatment decision stage early breast cancer cases were randomly assigned to different decision-making physician panels (each panel consisted of three different seniority physicians in different grades hospitals), each physician made an independent "Initial Decision" and then reviewed the CDSS report online and made a "Final Decision". In addition, the CDSS and guideline expert groups independently review all cases and generate "CDSS Recommendations" and "Guideline Recommendations" respectively. Based on the design framework, a multi-level multi-indicator system including "Decision Concordance", "Calibrated Concordance", " Decision Concordance with High-level Physician", "Consensus Rate", "Decision Stability", "Guideline Conformity", and "Calibrated Conformity" were constructed. Results 531 cases containing 2124 decision points were enrolled; 27 different seniority physicians from 10 different grades hospitals have generated 6372 decision opinions before and after referring to the "CDSS Recommendations" report respectively. Overall, the calibrated decision concordance was significantly higher for CDSS and provincial-senior physicians (80.9%) than other physicians. At the same time, CDSS has a higher " decision concordance with high-level physician" (76.3%-91.5%) than all physicians. The CDSS had significantly higher guideline conformity than all decision-making physicians and less internal variation, with an overall guideline conformity variance of 17.5% (97.5% vs. 80.0%), a standard deviation variance of 6.6% (1.3% vs. 7.9%), and a mean difference variance of 7.8% (1.5% vs. 9.3%). In addition, provincial-middle seniority physicians had the highest decision stability (54.5%). The overall consensus rate among physicians was 64.2%. Conclusions There are significant internal variation in the standardization treatment level of different seniority physicians in different geographical regions in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. CDSS has a higher standardization treatment level than all physicians and has the potential to provide immediate decision support to physicians and have a positive impact on standardizing physicians' treatment behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunguang Han
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yubo Pan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Xiaowei Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Jianbin Li
- Department of Breast Cancer, Fifth Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhengkui Sun
- Department of Breast Oncology Surgery, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (The Second People's Hospital of Jiangxi Province), Nanchang, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Gongsheng Jin
- Department of Oncological Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China
| | - Fang Fang
- Department of Thyroid and Breast surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital), Wuhhu, China
| | - Xiaofeng Pan
- Department of Thyroid and Breast surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital), Wuhhu, China
| | - Tong Tang
- Department of General Surgury, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Department of General Surgury, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Shiyong Pang
- Department of General Surgery, Lu'an People's Hospital of Anhui Province (Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University), Lu'an, China
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital (Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University), Anqing, China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The people's hospital of Bozhou (Bozhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University), Bozhou, China
| | - Yun Ren
- Department of Thyroid and Breast surgery, Department of Oncological Surgery, Taihe county people's hospital (The Taihe hospital of Wannan Medical College), Fuyang, China
| | - Mengyou Liu
- Department of Thyroid and Breast surgery, Lixin County People's Hospital, Bozhou, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fuyang Cancer Hospital, Fuyang, China
| | - Mengxue Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Jiqi Zhao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Chenyang Lu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhengdong Lu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Dongjing Gao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zefei Jiang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Fifth Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Pei
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Depypere H. Treatment of women with BRCA mutation. Climacteric 2023; 26:235-239. [PMID: 37011662 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2023.2189583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
The cumulative risk for breast and ovarian cancer is high in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. The lifetime risk of breast cancer by the age of 80 years is respectively up to 72% and 69% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The risk of ovarian cancer is higher (44%) in BRCA1 than in BRCA2 (17%) mutation carriers. Breast and ovarian cancers tend to arise earlier in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers are more frequently (up to 70%) triple negative while the majority (up to 80%) of breast cancers in BRCA2 mutation carriers are hormone sensitive. Many issues remain to be resolved. In daily practice we are often confronted with patients having BRCA mutations classified as variants of unknown significance, who do have breast cancer personally or have a strong family history of breast cancer. On the other hand, 30-40% of mutation carriers will not develop breast cancer. Moreover, it is very difficult to predict the age at which cancer will arise. In a multidisciplinary setting we need to offer BRCA and other mutation carriers a wide range of information, advice and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Depypere
- Menopause and Breast Clinic, University Hospital and Coupure Menopause Center, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041260. [PMID: 36831598 PMCID: PMC9954587 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery is a well-established treatment standard for early invasive breast cancer. Screening, early diagnosis, refinement in surgical techniques, the knowledge of new and specific molecular prognostic factors, and now the standard use of more effective neo/adjuvant systemic therapies have proven instrumental in reducing the rates of locoregional relapses. This underscores the need for reliably identifying women with such low-risk disease burdens in whom elimination of radiation from the treatment plan would not compromise oncological safety. This review summarizes the current evidence for radiation de-intensification strategies and details ongoing prospective clinical trials investigating the omission of adjuvant whole breast irradiation in molecularly defined low-risk breast cancers and related evidence supporting the potential for radiation de-escalation in HER2+ and triple-negative clinical subtypes. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence for the de-escalation of regional nodal irradiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we also detail the current knowledge of the clinical value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and liquid-based biomarkers as prognostic factors for locoregional relapse.
Collapse
|
10
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ER-negative/HER2-negative, T1abN0 breast cancer: a nationwide study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:103-112. [PMID: 36576678 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06839-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of chemotherapy on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) in a nationwide cohort of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, T1abN0 breast cancer. METHODS Patients with ER-negative/HER2-negative, T1abN0 breast cancer registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group database between 2007 and 2016 were identified. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on iDFS and OS was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS In total, 296 patients were included in the statistical analyses. Of these, 235 (79.4%) received chemotherapy and 61 patients (20.6%) did not. Patients treated with chemotherapy were significantly younger, had a significantly higher proportion of grade 3 tumors, T1b tumors, and tumors of ductal subtype. With 7.7 years of median follow-up, treatment with chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in OS in the adjusted analysis, Hazard Ratio 0.35 (95% Confidence Interval (0.15-0.81), p = 0.02), chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy. In the unadjusted analyses, patients with both T1a and T1b tumors had significantly improved OS with chemotherapy. At 5 years, OS was 100% vs. 94.4% and 93.8% vs. 81.3% for patients with T1a and T1b tumors, respectively, chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy. With 4.9 years of median follow-up, iDFS was not significantly improved with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Patients with ER-negative/HER2-negative, T1abN0 breast cancer had significantly improved OS when treated with chemotherapy. This improvement was significant in patients with both T1a and T1b tumors, respectively. The effect was, however, limited in patients with T1a tumors.
Collapse
|
11
|
Shum K, Hussein A, Hamm C. Are we overtreating stage I triple-negative breast cancer in Ontario? A population-based retrospective epidemiological analysis using the ICES database. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (NORTHWOOD, LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 39:228. [PMID: 36175693 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01829-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with inferior outcomes. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, and its efficacy was demonstrated to be correlated with tumor size. Different guidelines exist regarding chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC. This study uses ICES database to examine the outcomes of the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I TNBC in Ontario stratified by tumor size. Records of TNBC patients diagnosed in 2012 to 2014 were collected from ICES database. Stage I patients were analyzed by tumor size: T1a (≤ 0.5 cm), T1b (> 0.5 cm and ≤ 1.0 cm), and T1c (> 1.0 cm and ≤ 2.0 cm). Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test statistic, and Cox's proportional hazard regression were used to compare differences in overall survival (OS) between chemotherapy and no-chemotherapy groups. Of 610 patients, 183 had tumor sizes ≤ 1 cm, representing stages T1aN0M0 and T1bN0M0, and 427 had tumors > 1 cm to 2 cm, representing stage T1cN0M0. Patients with tumors ≤ 1 cm who received chemotherapy did not have a significant difference in OS compared to the no-chemotherapy group (p = 0.41, hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.021-2.5). However, patients with tumor sizes > 1 cm to 2 cm who received chemotherapy demonstrated significantly better OS compared to those without (p = 0.023, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-0.86). Patients with TNBC stage T1cN0M0 should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For TNBC tumors ≤ 1 cm, avoidance of chemotherapy can be considered. Prospective research should further investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy in TNBC stages T1a-bN0M0.Trial Registration University of Windsor REB#16-119.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Shum
- Western University, London, ON, Canada.,University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Hamm
- University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada. .,Windsor Regional Hospital, Windsor, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shen K, Yao L, Zhu J, Gu X, Wang J, Qian W, Zheng Z, Fu D, Wu S. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on T1N0M0 breast cancer patients: a propensity score matching study based on SEER database and external cohort. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:863. [PMID: 35941565 PMCID: PMC9358893 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09952-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is no clear consensus on the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage T1 (T1N0M0) breast cancer (BC). Our study investigated the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on T1N0M0 BC patients. Methods Seventy-five thousand one hundred thirty-nine patients diagnosed with T1N0M0 BC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate Cox analyses were performed to investigate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on T1a, T1b, and T1cN0M0 BC, including various tumor grades, and four molecular subtypes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate confounding factors and further compare the results between adjuvant chemotherapy and no adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, 545 T1N0M0 BC patients treated at the Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital were included as an independent external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to confirm the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in T1a, T1b, and T1cN0M0 BC. Survival curves for the different tumor grades and molecular subtypes were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in T1b and T1c BC, but not in T1a BC. Within T1b BC, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to have effects on grade III, and hormone receptor + (HoR +)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 + (HER2 +), HoR-/HER2 + , and HoR-/HER2- molecular subtypes, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial to OS for grade II/III and T1c BC. Identical results were obtained after PSM. We also obtained similar results with external validation cohort, except that adjuvant chemotherapy made a difference in grade II and T1b BC of the external validation dataset. Conclusions Partial T1N0M0 BC patients with grade III T1bN0M0, patients with tumor grade II and III T1cN0M0, and excluding those with HoR + /HER2- subtype tumors, could obtain OS benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09952-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiwen Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Longdi Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Changxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou, 313100, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jingyuan Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ximing Gu
- Department of General Surgery, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Qian
- Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhijian Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenling, 317500, Zhejiang, China
| | - Deyuan Fu
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou University Medical Academy, Guangling District, Nantong Xi Road, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Song Wu
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Chuanan Nan Road, Chengxi Street, Wenling, 317500, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yin J, Zhu C, Wang G, Gu J. Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:5901-5914. [PMID: 35795302 PMCID: PMC9252584 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s370351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In recent years, many meta-analyses of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment have been published; however, these studies still lack systematic summary. Therefore, the aim of this study is to summarize and evaluate the evidence level and efficacy of treatment for TNBC. Materials and Methods Retrospective and prospective studies on treatment of TNBC were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The literature search deadline was June 30, 2021. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted the data. In addition, the joint World Health Organization–United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization expert consultation was used to evaluate the validity of the evidence. Results A total of 28 meta-analyses were included in this study. The treatment interventions for TNBC mainly included surgery, chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, zoledronic acid, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog. Platinum improves the pathological complete response (PCR) rate of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the objective remission rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Capecitabine improves disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in patients treated with adjuvant CT. Bevacizumab was added to NACT to improve the PCR rate in patients. Immunotherapy improves the PCR rate in patients treated with NACT. The improvement in PCR rate in patients with high Ki67 expression treated with neoadjuvant therapy is highly suggestive. Other interventions had suggestive or weak evidence. Conclusion Among the strategies for treating TNBC, platinum, bevacizumab, and immunotherapy can lead to better PCR rates as part of a NACT regimen. Capecitabine as adjuvant CT and platinum in the treatment of metastatic TNBC can benefit patients’ survival. However, the effectiveness of other interventions for TNBC is not yet clear. Further research is needed in the future to obtain more reliable clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyun Yin
- Thyroid Breast Surgery, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Changtai Zhu
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Shanghai Sixth Peoples' Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaofeng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Gu
- Thyroid Breast Surgery, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gupta RK, Roy AM, Gupta A, Takabe K, Dhakal A, Opyrchal M, Kalinski P, Gandhi S. Systemic Therapy De-Escalation in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Dawn of a New Era? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081856. [PMID: 35454764 PMCID: PMC9025008 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Triple-negative breast cancer is a life-threatening disease, even when identified at early stages. Recent advances have allowed the improvement of life expectancy via a personalized approach with the addition of newer chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and targeted therapies, but at the cost of added side effects. It has become increasingly clear that not all patients need such aggressive treatment. Here, we provide an overview of emerging opportunities to use less toxic therapies in patients at lower risk of recurrence or with mutations that can be effectively targeted using novel approaches. We provide a comprehensive review of completed and ongoing clinical trials with information on how to best stratify these patients for treatments to obtain maximum benefit without unnecessary toxicities. Abstract Early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been traditionally treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The current standard of care systemic treatment of early-stage II and III TNBC involves the use of anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and carboplatin-paclitaxel with pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant setting followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab per KEYNOTE-522. It is increasingly clear that not all patients with early-stage TNBC need this intensive treatment, thus paving the way for exploring opportunities for regimen de-escalation in selected subgroups. For T1a tumors (≤5 mm), chemotherapy is not used, and for tumors 6–10 mm (T1b) in size with negative lymph nodes, retrospective studies have failed to show a significant benefit with chemotherapy. In low-risk patients, anthracycline-free chemotherapy may be as effective as conventional therapy, as shown in some studies where replacing anthracyclines with carboplatin has shown non-inferior results for pathological complete response (pCR), which may form the backbone of future combination therapies. Recent advances in our understanding of TNBC heterogeneity, mutations, and surrogate markers of response such as pCR have enabled the development of multiple treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting in order to de-escalate treatment. These de-escalation studies based on tumor mutational status, such as using Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in patients with BRCA mutations, and new immunotherapies such as PD1 blockade, have shown a promising impact on pCR. In addition, the investigational use of (bio)markers, such as high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), low levels of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and complete remission on imaging, also look promising. In this review, we cover the current standard of care systemic treatment of early TNBC and review the opportunities for treatment de-escalation based on clinical risk factors, biomarkers, mutational status, and molecular subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Kumar Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL 33143, USA;
| | - Arya Mariam Roy
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (A.M.R.); (A.G.); (P.K.)
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (A.M.R.); (A.G.); (P.K.)
| | - Kazuaki Takabe
- Department of Immunology and Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA;
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Ajay Dhakal
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14648, USA;
| | - Mateusz Opyrchal
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University Simons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | - Pawel Kalinski
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (A.M.R.); (A.G.); (P.K.)
- Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Shipra Gandhi
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (A.M.R.); (A.G.); (P.K.)
- Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(716)-845-1686
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Preneoplastic Low-Risk Mammary Ductal Lesions (Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Spectrum): Current Status and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030507. [PMID: 35158775 PMCID: PMC8833401 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Intraepithelial mammary ductal neoplasia is a spectrum of disease that varies from atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), low-grade (LG), intermediate-grade (IG), to high-grade (HG) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). While ADH has the lowest prognostic significance, HG-DCIS carries the highest risk. Due to widely used screening mammography, the number of intraepithelial mammary ductal neoplastic lesions has increased. The consequence of this practice is the increase in the number of patients who are overdiagnosed and, therefore, overtreated. The active surveillance (AS) trials are initiated to separate lesions that require active treatment from those that can be safely monitored and only be treated when they develop a change in the clinical/radiologic characteristics. At the same time, the natural history of these lesions can be evaluated. This review aims to evaluate ADH/DCIS as a spectrum of intraductal neoplastic disease (risk and histomorphology); examine the controversies of distinguishing ADH vs. DCIS and the grading of DCIS; review the upgrading for both ADH and DCIS with emphasis on the variation of methods of detection and the definitions of upgrading; and evaluate the impact of all these variables on the AS trials.
Collapse
|
16
|
Fasano GA, Bayard S, Chen Y, Varella L, Cigler T, Bensenhaver J, Simmons R, Swistel A, Marti J, Moore A, Andreopoulou E, Ng J, Brandmaier A, Formenti S, Ali H, Davis M, Newman L. Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative T1a versus T1b and T1c triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 192:163-173. [PMID: 35022867 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06481-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE National comprehensive cancer network guidelines recommend delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) if the tumor is > 1 cm and consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy for T1b but not T1a disease. These recommendations are based upon sparse data on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in T1a and T1b node-negative TNBC. Our objective was to clarify the benefits of chemotherapy for patients with T1N0 TNBC, stratified by tumor size. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of survival outcomes of TNBC patients at two academic institutions in the United States from 1999 to 2018. Primary tumor size, histology, and nodal status were based upon surgical pathology. The Kaplan-Meier plot and 5-year unadjusted survival probability were evaluated. RESULTS Among 282 T1N0 TNBC cases, the status of adjuvant chemotherapy was known for 258. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 30.5% of T1a, 64.7% T1b, and 83.9% T1c (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy were tumor size and grade 3 disease. Improved overall survival was associated with use of chemotherapy in patients with T1c disease (93.2% vs. 75.2% p = 0.008) but not T1a (100% vs. 100% p = 0.3778) or T1b (100% vs. 95.8% p = 0.2362) disease. CONCLUSION Our data support current guidelines indicating benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative TNBC associated with T1c tumors but excellent outcomes were observed in the cases of T1a and T1b disease, regardless of whether adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve A Fasano
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Solange Bayard
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yalei Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Leticia Varella
- Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tessa Cigler
- Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Rache Simmons
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Swistel
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Marti
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne Moore
- Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eleni Andreopoulou
- Department of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Brandmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Silvia Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haythem Ali
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Melissa Davis
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Newman
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Elghazaly H, Rugo HS, Azim HA, Swain SM, Arun B, Aapro M, Perez EA, Anderson BO, Penault-Llorca F, Conte P, El Saghir NS, Yip CH, Ghosn M, Poortmans P, Shehata MA, Giuliano AE, Leung JWT, Guarneri V, Gligorov J, Gulluoglu BM, Abdel Aziz H, Frolova M, Sabry M, Balch CM, Orecchia R, El-Zawahry HM, Al-Sukhun S, Abdel Karim K, Kandil A, Paltuev RM, Foheidi M, El-Shinawi M, ElMahdy M, Abulkhair O, Yang W, Aref AT, Bakkach J, Bahie Eldin N, Elghazawy H. Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Consensus and Recommendations for the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2262. [PMID: 34066769 PMCID: PMC8125909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is challenging with several controversies and unmet needs. During the 12th Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Egypt, 2020, a panel of 35 breast cancer experts from 13 countries voted on consensus guidelines for the clinical management of TNBC. The consensus was subsequently updated based on the most recent data evolved lately. Methods: A consensus conference approach adapted from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was utilized. The panellists voted anonymously on each question, and a consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer. The final consensus was later circulated to the panellists for critical revision of important intellectual content. Results and conclusion: These recommendations represent the available clinical evidence and expert opinion when evidence is scarce. The percentage of the consensus votes, levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are presented for each statement. The consensus covered all the aspects of TNBC management starting from defining TNBC to the management of metastatic disease and highlighted the rapidly evolving landscape in this field. Consensus was reached in 70% of the statements (35/50). In addition, areas of warranted research were identified to guide future prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elghazaly
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Hamdy A. Azim
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (H.M.E.-Z.)
| | - Sandra M. Swain
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, MedStar Health, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Matti Aapro
- Breast Center, Clinique de Genolier, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland;
| | - Edith A. Perez
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Benjamin O. Anderson
- Breast Health Global Initiative, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology, Clermont Auvergne University, INSERM U1240 “Molecular Imaging and Theranostic Strategies”, Center Jean Perrin, Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Pierfranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Nagi S. El Saghir
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon;
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 47500, Malaysia;
| | - Marwan Ghosn
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Saint Joseph University, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon;
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Mohamed A. Shehata
- Clinical oncology Department, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom 51132, Egypt;
| | - Armando E. Giuliano
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology Division, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
| | - Jessica W. T. Leung
- Department of Breast Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, INSERM U938, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Bahadir M. Gulluoglu
- Breast & Endocrine Surgery Unit, Marmara University School of Medicine, University Hospital, Istanbul 34722, Turkey;
| | - Hany Abdel Aziz
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Mona Frolova
- Federal State Budgetary Institution “NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 127994 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Mohamed Sabry
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Charles M. Balch
- Surgical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), and University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Heba M. El-Zawahry
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (H.M.E.-Z.)
| | | | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Alaa Kandil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria School of Medicine, Alexandria 21131, Egypt;
| | - Ruslan M. Paltuev
- Russian Association of Oncological Mammology, Department of Breast Tumours of Federal State Budgetary Institution “Petrov Research Institute of Oncology”, 197758 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Meteb Foheidi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Adult Medical Oncology, Princess Noorah Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs-Western Region, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Mohamed El-Shinawi
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt;
- Vice President of Galala University, Galala University, Suez 435611, Egypt
| | - Manal ElMahdy
- Department of Pathology, Ain shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt;
| | - Omalkhair Abulkhair
- Oncology Department, Alfaisal university, Alhabib Hospital, Riyad 11533, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Adel T. Aref
- The School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia;
| | - Joaira Bakkach
- Biomedical Genomics & Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, Abdel Malek Essaadi University, Tangier 90000, Morocco;
| | - Nermean Bahie Eldin
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Hagar Elghazawy
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence rate in T1abN0M0 triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020; 25:100211. [PMID: 33113437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known for its higher recurrence rate in short-term (3-5 years) follow-up and limited systemic therapeutic methods (chemotherapy). Current literature debates over whether chemotherapy should be given to TNBC with a very early disease stage (T1a/bN0). This meta-analysis aimed to compare short-term recurrence rate between patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or not for this population. METHODS We performed a comprehensive search in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library from January 2008 to December 2019. Raw data on local or distance recurrence events was extracted, odds ratio (OR) values, 95% confidence interval (CI) values, and P values were then calculated. RESULTS 9 studies out of 426 were included in the meta-analysis. Our main results showed that breast cancer recurrence rate in T1a/bN0 TNBC patients receiving chemotherapy was significantly lower than those without chemotherapy (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.78, P = 0.001). Similar results were detected in the T1b group (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78). The main result remained stable after sensitivity analysis. No significant publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS Our results revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy reduced recurrence rate for T1mi/a/bN0 TNBC, especially for T1bN0. The benefit of chemotherapy for T1mi/aN0 disease is still debated.
Collapse
|