Distance to treatment center is associated with survival in children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Exploring potential influencing factors of inadherence to specialist aftercare and long-term medication in patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

To improve the understanding of adherence as one major factor of disease control in acromegaly patients, we systematically assessed patients' motivations to adhere to advised follow-up schedules and recommended medication for acromegaly.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, postal questionnaire study on adult patients with acromegaly, operated upon a growth hormone producing pituitary adenoma more than 1 year ago in two tertiary treatment centers. We assessed demographic and clinical characteristics, disease status, adherence to acromegaly medication and/or aftercare, and the five dimensions defined by the World Health Organization influencing adherence. Wherever applicable, we included validated short scales. The answers of 63 patients (33 f, 30 m; mean age 56.1 y) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with problems in adherence to aftercare had a significantly lower subjective symptomload than those adherent to aftercare (p = 0.026) and a lower perceived need for treatment (p = 0.045). Patients with adherence problems to medication had a higher subjective symptomload than those without (p = 0.056). They also tended to have shorter consultations, were significantly more often dissatisfied with the duration of their medical consultations (42% vs 4.8%, p = 0.019) and tended to find that their physician explained potential difficulties with adherence less well than patients without adherence problems (p = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study which explored adherence to medication and aftercare in patients with acromegaly, taking into account potential influencing factors from all areas defined by the WHO model of adherence. Of the modifiable factors of adherence, patient-doctor relationship seemed to play a crucial role and could be one leverage point to improve adherence.

Survival Outcomes in Older Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Analyzed by Facility Volume and Type: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BAKGROUND

It is important to understand the outcomes of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients at different facilities as treatment paradigms change.

AIMS

Our primary objective was to determine adult ALL overall survival (OS) by facility volume and type. Secondary objectives included identifying sociodemographic factors that may have impacted outcomes and analyzing treatment patterns by facility volume and type.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) that included patients ≥40 years diagnosed with ALL between 2004 and 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 14 593 patients were included in this study. Univariate OS was greatest at low volume (LV) and community programs (CPs) and the least at high volume (HV) and academic programs (AP). This difference was lost after multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis, which found no difference in survival by facility volume or type, however, survival was significantly influenced by age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, insurance, and residence location (p < 0.05). Patients treated at HV and APs compared to LV and CP received more anti-neoplastic directed therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest treatment facility volume and type do not impact older adult ALL patient (≥40 years) survival, however confounding sociodemographic differences do impact survival outcomes, despite more aggressive and novel treatment approaches provided at HV and APs.

Morbidity and mortality among children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer over six decades: a Swedish population-based cohort study (the Rebuc study)

Background

Despite progress in managing cancer in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs), persistent complications may impact their quality of life. This study covers the morbidity and mortality, among CAYAs, with the aim to investigate the influence of socioeconomic factors on outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective matched cohort study included the entire Swedish population of individuals under 25 with cancer 1958-2021. The population was identified from the Cancer Register, and controls were paired 1:5 based on age, sex, and residence. Multiple registers provided data on morbidity, mortality, and demographics.

Findings

This survey covering 63 years, identified 65,173 CAYAs and matched controls, a total of 378,108 individuals (74% females). CAYAs exhibited a 3.04-times higher risk for subsequent cancer (Odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.92-3.17, p < 0.0001), a 1.23-times higher risk for cardiovascular disease (OR 95% CI 1.20-1.26, p < 0.0001), and a 1.41-times higher risk for external affliction (OR 95% CI 1.34-1.49, p < 0.0001). CAYAs had a higher mortality hazard, and after adjusting for socioeconomic factors, males, individuals born outside Europe, and those with greater sick-leave had a higher association with mortality, while education and marriage showed a beneficial association.

Interpretation

The Rebuc study, showed an increased risk for serious complications among young cancer patients in Sweden. Patient-specific variables, demographics, and socioeconomic factors influenced mortality. These results underscore the impact of cancer on the health and lifespan of young individuals and the necessity for further research to address socioeconomic disparities in cancer care.

Funding

Grants from the Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), ALF Grants, Region Ostergotland, and The Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund.

Association of the clinical profile and overall survival of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introduction

The clarification of etiopathology, the improvement of chemotherapy regimens and their risk stratifications, and the improvement in treatment support have increased the survival of children and adolescents affected by Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) past few years. This study aimed to estimate overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in an onco-hematology treatment center in Brazil, reports the main clinical-laboratory characteristics of patients at diagnosis, verify the frequency of treatment-related adverse effects and the main causes of death.

Material and methods

Retrospective analysis involving patients diagnosed with ALL, treated with the protocol of the Brazilian Group for Treatment of Leukemias in Childhood (GBTLI), between 2010 and 2020 was carried out; the outcomes (relapse, deaths, development of new neoplasms) were analyzed SPSS® software was used for the statistical analyses, and the p-value was considered significant when less than 0.05 for all analyses.

Results

109 patients were included in the study; the median age was 5 years, with a slight predominance of males. Sixty-six patients were classified as high-risk (HR) group and 43 patients were classified as low-risk (LR) group. After 5 years of diagnosis, the OS was 71.5%, and the EFS was 65%. No statistical difference was found between the HR and LR groups for OS and EFS, while leukocyte counts were statistically associated with the outcome of death (p = 0.028). Among the patients, 28 (25.6%) died due to infection accounting 46.4% of death causes. Among the 34 patients with unfavorable outcomes (death and/or relapse), 32 had no research for the minimal residual disease at the end of remission induction, and 25 were not investigated for the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. The most reported complications and treatment-related adverse effects were increased liver transaminases (85.9%), airway infection (79.4%), oral mucositis (67.2%), febrile neutropenia (64.4%), and diarrhea (36.4%).

Conclusions

The rates of OS and EFS obtained in this cohort are similar to those obtained in the few previous similar studies in Brazil and lower than those carried out in developed countries. The unavailability of prognostic tests may have hindered risk stratification and influenced the results obtained.

Ethnic disparities in childhood leukemia survival by border residence: A Texas population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The US-Mexico border is a medically underserved region where survival disparities have been observed in adults diagnosed and treated for various malignancies. Studies examining survival disparities among children living in this region and diagnosed with cancer are lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of border residence on survival among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and living near the Texas-Mexico border at the time of their diagnosis. The authors hypothesized that this group experiences inferior survival compared with patients with childhood leukemia living in nonborder areas.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective survival analysis leveraging data from the Texas Cancer Registry. The study included patients aged birth to 19 years who were diagnosed with ALL or AML between 1995 and 2017. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the factors associated with the risk of death. Overall survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 6002 children diagnosed with ALL and 1279 diagnosed with AML. Inferior 5-year overall survival was observed among children with ALL living along the border region compared with those living in nonborder areas (77.5% vs. 85.8%). In adjusted models, children with ALL living along the border experienced a 30% increased hazard of death versus children living in nonborder areas. In contrast, for children with AML, survival estimates did not vary by border versus nonborder residence.

CONCLUSIONS

Living along the border was associated with inferior survival among children with ALL, but not among children with AML. Additional studies are urgently needed to identify the factors driving these disparities to effectively design multilevel interventions and influence state and national cancer control programs.

Persistent Child Poverty and Mortality in a Cohort of Children with Cancer in Alabama

BACKGROUND

One-fifth of U.S. counties are designated persistent child poverty counties (≥20% of children in poverty since 1980). The association between a persistent child poverty environment and mortality in children with cancer is unknown.

METHODS

Our cohort includes 2,089 children with cancer (2000-2016) in Alabama. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling (adjusted for sociodemographics/clinical characteristics) to assess mortality by persistent child poverty designation at 1, 5, and 10 years from diagnosis. Distance to treatment was subsequently explored.

RESULTS

Forty-two percent of the cohort lived in a persistent child poverty county; they were more likely to be African American (P < 0.0001), have public/no insurance (P = 0.0009), and live >100 miles to treatment (P < 0.0001). Children in persistent child poverty counties were 30% more likely to die by 5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.59; P = 0.012]. Distance (per 20-mile increase) to treatment was associated with a 9% increased mortality risk (P < 0.0001). Children with both exposures (distance >100 miles and persistent child poverty) faced the highest mortality risk at 5 years (HR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.39-2.33; P < 0.0001). In subanalysis, children exposed to persistent child poverty were at higher risk for cancer-related mortality. However, the risk of health-related mortality did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with cancer from the Deep South, persistent child poverty was a prevalent exposure associated with inferior overall survival. Distance to treatment was independently associated with inferior survival. Children with both exposures had the highest risk of mortality.

IMPACT

Persistent child poverty is associated with inferior survival among children with cancer; mechanisms underlying this disparity warrant investigation. See related commentary by Orjuela-Grimm and Beauchemin, p. 295.

Population-Based Impact of Rurality and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Pediatric Cancer Mortality in Washington State

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer-related mortality differs by socioeconomic factors, but the impact of residential location, including rurality and neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage, is not well-characterized.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study linked Washington State cancer registry data (1992-2013) to state birth (1974-2013) and death records (1992-2013) to identify residents <20 years diagnosed with cancer (n = 4,306). Census-based rural-urban commuting area codes and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) defined rural residence and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage at time of cancer diagnosis, respectively. Neighborhoods in the highest state ADI quintile were classified as the most disadvantaged. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox hazards models, adjusted for key characteristics, were used to compare mortality by rural and ADI classification.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival for children from non-rural low ADI neighborhoods (referent) was 80.9%±0.8%, versus 66.4%±2.9% from non-rural high ADI neighborhoods, 69.4%±3.8% from rural low ADI neighborhoods, and 66.9%±3.8% from rural high ADI neighborhoods (P < 0.01 for each comparison versus referent). Compared with the referent group, children from comparator neighborhoods had a greater mortality risk: Rural low ADI [hazard ratio (HR), 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-2.02], rural high ADI (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16-2.01), and non-rural high ADI (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.32-2.04). Associations of ADI and rurality with mortality varied in sub-analyses by cancer type.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with cancer living in rural and/or socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods at diagnosis experienced greater mortality relative to those without either factor.

IMPACT

Future investigation is needed to examine how rurality and poverty potentially impact healthcare utilization and health-related outcomes in pediatric oncology.

Measuring disparities in event-free survival among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in an academic institute in Oklahoma, 2005-2019

BACKGROUND

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common type of childhood cancer. While there have been successes in the treatment of leukemia, less information is available on reasons for disparities in event-free survival (EFS) among underserved populations.

METHODS

We partnered with a children's hospital at an academic institution to abstract data from the institution's cancer registry, the state cancer registry, and electronic medical records on cancer diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for children with ALL (n = 275) diagnosed from 2005 to 2019 prior to age 20. We evaluated the relation between 1) race/ethnicity, 2) distance to the children's hospital, and 3) area deprivation with EFS, defined as time from diagnosis to relapse, death, or the end of the study period. We evaluated differences in EFS using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test. We used the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for multivariable survival analyses.

RESULTS

Most children were diagnosed with ALL under five years of age (45%) and with Pre-B ALL (87%). Twelve percent of children experienced a relapse and 5% died during induction or remission. EFS at 5 years was 82%. Non-Hispanic (NH) Black children had worse, though imprecise, EFS compared to NH White children (Adjusted Hazard Ratio: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.80, 5.38). Children residing in areas with higher deprivation had a higher adjusted hazard of poor outcomes compared to the least deprived areas, though estimates were imprecise (2nd quartile HR: 1.51, 3rd quartile: 1.85, 4th quartile: 1.62). We observed no association between distance to the children's hospital and EFS.

CONCLUSION

We observed poorer EFS for NH Black children and children residing in areas with high deprivation, though the estimates were not statistically significant. Our next steps include further evaluating socioeconomic factors in both rural and urban children to identify disparities in outcomes for children with ALL and other childhood cancers.

Disparities in Treatment Satisfaction and Supportive Care Receipt for Young Adult Oncology Patients on the Basis of Residential Location

PURPOSE:

Adolescent and young adult oncology programs are critical but exist primarily in academic centers, prompting potential disparities in care on the basis of patient residence. We studied the impact of residential location on supportive care receipt and treatment satisfaction in young adults (YAs) with cancer age 19-39 years treated at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC).

METHODS:

YA patients with cancer age 19-39 years seen at UWCCC from March 30, 2019, to March 29, 2020, were sent a survey assessing supportive care receipt and satisfaction. Survey results were compared with retrospective chart review of YAs seen at UWCCC between April 1, 2011, and April 1, 2021. Data were categorized on the basis of residential location using distance from UWCCC and 2013 Rural-Urban Continuum Code (RUCC).

RESULTS:

Survey results were obtained for 145 YAs, including 29 from nonmetro RUCC (20.0%) and 81 living > 20 miles from UWCCC (55.9%). YAs from nonmetro locations had lower satisfaction with available treatments (79.3% v 91.4%, P = .005), and distant YAs living > 20 miles from UWCCC more frequently identified location as a barrier to supportive care receipt (35.6% v 15.8%, P = .02). Metro YAs more frequently listed fertility consultations as unavailable (38.0% v 16.0%, P = .04) in the survey despite chart review data showing higher rates of sexual health assessments (48.2% v 20.4%, P = .002) and fertility visits (29.6% v 18.5%, P = .18).

CONCLUSION:

We identified differences in both supportive care receipt and treatment satisfaction on the basis of residential location. These findings support the need for measures to successfully meet treatment and supportive care needs regardless of residential location.

Recent research on the association between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) can be involved in the processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and hematopoiesis, and its dysregulation is closely associated with the development and progression of malignant tumors including leukemia and may affect the treatment outcome and prognosis of pediatric patients. Identification of STAT5 can facilitate targeted therapy to improve the response rate of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This article reviews the impact of STAT5 on the development/progression, targeted therapy strategies and the prognosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia in Virginia: Excellent survival outcomes for patients in rural Appalachia

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia, the most common acute leukemia in adults, has a poor overall survival. Studies have suggested that certain socioeconomic factors such as living in a rural or farming area are associated with worse outcomes. Since 42% of acute myeloid leukemia patients seen in our academic center reside in a rural area, we have a unique opportunity to study outcomes of patients in rural versus urban settings.

Aim

This analysis evaluates the effect of geography and socioeconomic factors on the biology, treatment, and overall survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, with the goal of understanding health care disparities.

Methods and results

Patient characteristics, cytogenetic data, treatment history, and overall survival were collected and analyzed to identify differences between urban and rural residency. This cohort included 42% of patients who resided in a rural area at the time of acute myeloid leukemia diagnosis. There was no difference in overall survival between the cohorts. The 1 year overall survival for the entire cohort was 47.9%. There was no difference detected in rates of adverse cytogenetics between the rural and urban cohorts. Similar numbers of patients received induction chemotherapy or proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant between the cohorts.

Conclusions

This study highlights that similar outcomes can be achieved in rural and urban patients, suggesting that intensive efforts at telehealth, education, and collaboration with local oncology practices may be beneficial.