Treatment patterns and survival in patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer

Predicting the risk of pancreatic cancer in adults with new-onset diabetes: development and internal-external validation of a clinical risk prediction model

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that people aged 60+ years with newly diagnosed diabetes and weight loss undergo abdominal imaging to assess for pancreatic cancer. More nuanced stratification could lead to enrichment of these referral pathways.

METHODS

Population-based cohort study of adults aged 30-85 years at type 2 diabetes diagnosis (2010-2021) using the QResearch primary care database in England linked to secondary care data, the national cancer registry and mortality registers. Clinical prediction models were developed to estimate risks of pancreatic cancer diagnosis within 2 years and evaluated using internal-external cross-validation.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and sixty-seven of 253,766 individuals were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within 2 years. Models included age, sex, BMI, prior venous thromboembolism, digoxin prescription, HbA1c, ALT, creatinine, haemoglobin, platelet count; and the presence of abdominal pain, weight loss, jaundice, heartburn, indigestion or nausea (previous 6 months). The Cox model had the highest discrimination (Harrell's C-index 0.802 (95% CI: 0.797-0.817)), the highest clinical utility, and was well calibrated. The model's highest 1% of predicted risks captured 12.51% of pancreatic cancer cases. NICE guidance had 3.95% sensitivity.

DISCUSSION

A new prediction model could have clinical utility in identifying individuals with recent onset diabetes suitable for fast-track abdominal imaging.

Early onset pancreatic cancer-exploring contemporary treatment and outcomes using real-world data

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer incidence is increasing in younger populations. Differences between early onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) and later onset pancreatic cancer (LOPC), and how these should inform management warrant exploration in the contemporary setting.

METHODS

A prospectively collected multi-site dataset on consecutive pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients was interrogated. Patient, tumour, treatment, and outcome data were extracted for EOPC (≤50 years old) vs LOPC (>50 years old).

RESULTS

Of 1683 patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2022, 112 (6.7%) were EOPC. EOPC more frequently had the tail of pancreas tumours, earlier stage disease, surgical resection, and trended towards increased receipt of chemotherapy in the curative setting compared to LOPC. EOPC more frequently received 1st line chemotherapy, 2nd line chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy than LOPC in the palliative setting. Recurrence-free survival was improved for the tail of pancreas EOPC vs LOPC in the resected setting; overall survival was superior for EOPC compared to LOPC across the resected, locally advanced unresectable and metastatic settings.

CONCLUSIONS

EOPC remains a small proportion of pancreatic cancer diagnoses. The more favourable outcomes in EOPC suggest these younger patients are overall deriving benefits from increased treatment in the curative setting and increased therapy in the palliative setting.

The Global Burden of Early-Onset Pancreatic Cancer and Its Risk Factors: A Perspective From Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

OBJECTIVES

Despite evidence of increased incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC), defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed in patients below 50 years old, and its risk factors in the Western region, global epidemiological data addressing this issue is still lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Utilizing data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, we aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the incidence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) associated with EOPC and its risk factors, including smoking, obesity, and diabetes. The analysis examined the annual percentage change (APC) over the period.

RESULTS

In 2019, the incidence of EOPC surpassed 35,000 cases worldwide. This burden of EOPC tends to be more prevalent in males, as well as in Europe and high SDI countries. However, there is a noticeable upward trend in the burden of EOPC in the Eastern Mediterranean. While there is a global decline in EOPC mortality attributed to smoking (APC -0.33%), there is a concerning increase in mortality associated with diabetes (APC +2.84%) and obesity (APC +2.12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of EOPC has been increasing. The mortality is rising mainly from metabolic factors. There is an urgent need for national policy development for reducing the burden of this disease.

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic early-onset pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC; age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis) is on the rise, placing a heavy burden on individuals, families, and society. The role of combination therapy including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in non-metastatic EOPC is not well-defined.

AIM

To investigate the treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic EOPC.

METHODS

A total of 277 patients with non-metastatic EOPC who were treated at our institution between 2017 and 2021 were investigated retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 34.6 months, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 84.3%, 51.5%, and 27.6%, respectively. The median OS of patients with localized disease who received surgery alone and adjuvant therapy (AT) were 21.2 months and 28.8 months, respectively (P = 0.007). The median OS of patients with locally advanced disease who received radiotherapy-based combination therapy (RCT), surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and chemotherapy were 28.5 months, 25.6 months, and 14.0 months, respectively (P = 0.002). The median OS after regional recurrence were 16.0 months, 13.4 months, and 8.9 months in the RCT, chemotherapy, and supportive therapy groups, respectively (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, pathological grade, T-stage, N-stage, and resection were independent prognostic factors for non-metastatic EOPC.

CONCLUSION

AT improves postoperative survival in localized patients. Surgery after NAT and RCT are the preferred therapeutic options for patients with locally advanced EOPC.

Early vs conventional onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing curative intent resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) impacts patients in their 60s, but its incidence in younger patients is increasing. We hypothesize that younger patients may have worse oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative pancreatic resection for PDAC between January 2011 and December 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) was defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed in patients ≤50 years. Clinical and survival outcomes were compared between EOPC and Conventional Onset Pancreas Cancer (COPC).

RESULTS

A total of 1133 patients were identified, 65 (5.7%) were EOPC. Preoperative patient characteristics including sex, smoking status, alcohol habitus, diabetes mellitus, CA 19-9, and neoadjuvant therapy were similar between EOPC and COPC (p > 0.05). EOPC patients were more likely non-white (p = 0.03), had lower ASA scores (p = 0.02) and larger median tumor size (33 vs 28 mm, p = 0.04), but had similar pathological stages and rate of R0 resections (p > 0.05). Postoperative outcomes were similar (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in overall (HR 0.93, CI 0.64, 1.33; p = 0.68) or recurrence free (HR 1.05, CI 0.75, 1.48; p = 0.77) survival between the EOPC and COPC after adjusting for significant factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with EOPC who underwent surgical resection had similar oncological outcomes compared to patients with COPC.

Early-Onset Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical Presentation, Pathology Features, and Oncological Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Early-Onset (EO) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) is a rare disease, but whether it is clinically different from late-onset (LO) PanNET is unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate clinical differences and disease outcomes between EO-PanNET and LO-PanNET and to compare sporadic EO-PanNET with those with a hereditary syndrome.

METHODS

Patients with localized PanNET who underwent pancreatectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Those with metastatic disease and poorly differentiated tumors were excluded. EO-PanNET was defined as <50 and LO-PanNET >50 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Family history and clinical and pathology characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall 383 patients were included, 107 (27.9%) with EO-PanNET. Compared with LO-PanNET, EO-PanNET were more likely to have a hereditary syndrome (2.2% vs. 16%, P <0.001) but had similar pathology features such as tumor grade ( P =0.6), size (2.2 Vs. 2.3 cm, P =0.5) and stageof disease ( P =0.8). Among patients with EO-PanNET, those with hereditary syndrome had more frequently a multifocal disease (65% vs. 3.3%, P <0.001). With a median follow-up of 70 months (range 0-238), the 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence after curative surgery was 19% (95% CI 12%-28%) and 17% (95% CI 13%-23%), in EO-PanNET and LO-PanNET ( P =0.3). Five-year disease-specific survival was 99% (95% CI 98%-100%) with no difference with respect to PanNET onset time ( P =0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

In this surgical cohort, we found that EO-PanNET is associated with hereditary syndromes but has pathologic characteristics and oncological outcomes similar to LO-PanNET. These findings suggest that patients with EO-PanNET can be managed similarly to those with LO-PanNET.

The microbiome and rise of early-onset cancers: knowledge gaps and research opportunities

Accumulating evidence indicates an alarming increase in the incidence of early-onset cancers, which are diagnosed among adults under 50 years of age, in the colorectum, esophagus, extrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, liver, stomach, pancreas, as well as the bone marrow (multiple myeloma), breast, head and neck, kidney, prostate, thyroid, and uterine corpus (endometrium). While the early-onset cancer studies have encompassed research on the wide variety of organs, this article focuses on research on digestive system cancers. While a minority of early-onset cancers in the digestive system are associated with cancer-predisposing high penetrance germline genetic variants, the majority of those cancers are sporadic and multifactorial. Although potential etiological roles of diets, lifestyle, environment, and the microbiome from early life to adulthood (i.e. in one's life course) have been hypothesized, exact contribution of each of these factors remains uncertain. Diets, lifestyle patterns, and environmental exposures have been shown to alter the oral and intestinal microbiome. To address the rising trend of early-onset cancers, transdisciplinary research approaches including lifecourse epidemiology and molecular pathological epidemiology frameworks, nutritional and environmental sciences, multi-omics technologies, etc. are needed. We review current evidence and discuss emerging research opportunities, which can improve our understanding of their etiologies and help us design better strategies for prevention and treatment to reduce the cancer burden in populations.

Early-onset pancreatic cancer: A national cancer registry study from the Czech Republic and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare trends in mortality and incidence, clinicopathological features and survival of patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma under 50 years of age (early-onset pancreatic cancer [EOPC]) with patients diagnosed over 50 years of age (late-onset pancreatic cancer [LOPC]).

METHODS

The national oncological registry of the Czech Republic was reviewed to identify all patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed between the years 1985 and 2015. Incidence, mortality, clinicopathological and survival data were analyzed and compared between patients with EOPC and LOPC.

RESULTS

From a total of 18 888 patients included in the study, 1324 patients were under the age of 50 years (7.0%). The average annual percentage changes (AAPC) in incidence of all patients with EOPC was -1.0%. The APPC for male patients with EOPC was -2.0% and for female patients was +0.6%. The AAPC in incidence for LOPC was +1.3%. There were no differences in tumor stage, grade or location between EOPC and LOPC. Young patients were more frequently male (64.4% vs. 52.9%), more frequently underwent treatment and had better overall survival. The median survival interval for EOPC was 5.9 months and for LOPC was 4.5 months (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinicopathological features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were similar in patients under and over the age of 50 years. Patients with EOPC survived longer than patients with LOPC. Continued efforts should be made to diagnose early and treat young patients aggressively.

Clinical and genomic characterisation of early-onset pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) has risen dramatically in recent years. We aimed to characterise the clinical and genomic features of EOPC and evaluate their therapeutic implications.

METHODS

We performed a comparative, single-centre, retrospective analysis of clinical, germline, and genomic features in EOPC (≤50 years) patients and compared them with a control group of average-onset pancreatic cancer patients (AOPC, ≥70 years). Key molecular findings were compared with an external, publicly available cohort.

RESULTS

We reviewed 336 patients who met all inclusion criteria (EOPC N = 139, AOPC N = 197). EOPC was associated with smoking status, lower prevalence of diabetes, better performance status, higher CA19.9 levels, and higher albumin levels at diagnosis. After adjustment for baseline covariates, we observed no differences in overall survival (OS). Age was associated with an increase in the incidence of KRASMUT both in our cohort and the validation cohort. EOPC were enriched in potentially actionable alterations according to ESCAT tiers I-IIIA when compared with AOPC in discovery and validation cohorts (19% versus 14% and 14% versus 8%, respectively). In the first-line metastatic setting, EOPC had a longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.87) and OS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.95), although there were no differences in response rate. After adjusting for the number of treatment lines, EOPC patients who did receive targeted therapies exhibited longer OS compared with EOPC who did not (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

EOPC patients have improved outcomes in the metastatic setting when compared to AOPC and are enriched for targetable alterations that open opportunities for precision oncology-based approaches.

Biological and clinical implications of early-onset cancers: A unique subtype

In recent years, the incidence of cancers is continuously increasing in young adults. Early-onset cancer (EOC) is usually defined as patients with cancers under the age of 50, and may represent a unique subgroup due to its special disease features. Overall, EOCs often initiate at a young age, present as a better physical performance but high degree of malignancy. EOCs also share common epidemiological and hereditary risk factors. In this review, we discuss several representative EOCs which were well studied previously. By revealing their clinical and molecular similarities and differences, we consider the group of EOCs as a unique subtype compared to ordinary cancers. In consideration of EOC as a rising threat to human health, more researches on molecular mechanisms, and large-scale, prospective clinical trials should be carried out to further translate into improved outcomes.

Multiomic Characterization Reveals a Distinct Molecular Landscape in Young-Onset Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Using a real-world database with matched genomic-transcriptomic molecular data, we sought to characterize the distinct molecular correlates underlying clinical differences between patients with young-onset pancreatic cancer (YOPC; younger than 50 years) and patients with average-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC; 70 years and older).

METHODS

We analyzed matched whole-transcriptome and DNA sequencing data from 2,430 patient samples (YOPC, n = 292; AOPC, n = 2,138) from the Caris Life Sciences database (Phoenix, AZ). Immune deconvolution was performed using the quanTIseq pipeline. Overall survival (OS) data were obtained from insurance claims (n = 4,928); Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for age- and molecularly defined cohorts. Significance was determined as FDR-corrected P values (Q) < .05.

RESULTS

Patients with YOPC had higher proportions of mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high, BRCA2-mutant, and PALB2-mutant tumors compared with patients with AOPC, but fewer SMAD4-, RNF43-, CDKN2A-, and SF3B1-mutant tumors. Notably, patients with YOPC demonstrated significantly lower incidence of KRAS mutations compared with patients with AOPC (81.3% v 90.9%; Q = .004). In the KRAS wild-type subset (n = 227), YOPC tumors demonstrated fewer TP53 mutations and were more likely driven by NRG1 and MET fusions, whereas BRAF fusions were exclusively observed in patients with AOPC. Immune deconvolution revealed significant enrichment of natural killer cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, and M2 macrophages in patients with YOPC relative to patients with AOPC, which corresponded with lower rates of HLA-DPA1 homozygosity. There was an association with improved OS in patients with YOPC compared with patients with AOPC with KRAS wild-type tumors (median, 16.2 [YOPC-KRASWT] v 10.6 [AOPC-KRASWT] months; P = .008) but not KRAS-mutant tumors (P = .084).

CONCLUSION

In this large, real-world multiomic characterization of age-stratified molecular differences in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, YOPC is associated with a distinct molecular landscape that has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Photodynamic Stromal Depletion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid malignancies, with a five-year survival of less than 10%. The resistance of the disease and the associated lack of therapeutic response is attributed primarily to its dense, fibrotic stroma, which acts as a barrier to drug perfusion and permits tumour survival and invasion. As clinical trials of chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and targeted agents have not been successful, improving the survival rate in unresectable PDAC remains an urgent clinical need. Photodynamic stromal depletion (PSD) is a recent approach that uses visible or near-infrared light to destroy the desmoplastic tissue. Preclinical evidence suggests this can resensitise tumour cells to subsequent therapies whilst averting the tumorigenic effects of tumour-stromal cell interactions. So far, the pre-clinical studies have suggested that PDT can successfully mediate the destruction of various stromal elements without increasing the aggressiveness of the tumour. However, the complexity of this interplay, including the combined tumour promoting and suppressing effects, poses unknowns for the clinical application of photodynamic stromal depletion in PDAC.

Pancreatic cancer in young adults - an evolving entity?

The incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) among young population (<50 years) is rising in the last decade, with gender, medical overtreatment, and genetic factors as the risk factors in EOPC. Nevertheless, the role of genetic factors in the development of EOPC needs further exploration since the studies were carried out with small sample size and ambiguous evidence. Notable, the high incidence of pathogenic germline variant (PGV) appears to be involved in EOPC. Compared with average-age-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC), EOPC patients display a distinctive genomic feature on several well-known tumor suppressor and oncogenic genes including, including SMAD4, RAS wild wild-type, CDKN2A BRCA1, BRCA2 and FOXC2, which is different from the findings of studies with AOPC and LOPC, suggesting the dynamic evolving entity of EOPC. In addition, the potential gender-related incidence found in several countries also suggests the involvement of genetic or socioenvironmental factors in the development of AOPC. Therefore, further prospective epidemiological and molecular studies are warranted to elucidate the shifting epidemiology of this disease and, most importantly, to better exploit the opportunities for the early diagnosis of the disease.

Resected Early-Onset Pancreatic Cancer: Practices and Outcomes in an International Dual-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC), defined as age ≤ 45 years at diagnosis, accounts for 3% of all pancreatic cancer cases. Although differences in tumor biology have been suggested, available data are sparse and specific treatment recommendations are lacking. This study explores the clinicopathological features and oncologic outcomes of resected EOPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with EOPC undergoing resection between 2002 and 2018 were identified from the Heidelberg University Hospital and Johns Hopkins University registries. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 164 patients, most of whom had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n = 136; 82.9%) or IPMN-associated pancreatic cancer (n = 17; 10.4%). Twenty (12.1%) patients presented with stage 1 disease, 42 (25.6%) with stage 2, 75 (45.7%) with stage 3, and 22 (13.4%) with oligometastatic stage 4 disease. Most patients underwent upfront resection (n = 113, 68.9%), whereas 51 (31.1%) individuals received preoperative treatment. Median OS and RFS were 26.0 and 12.4 months, respectively. Stage-specific median survival was 70.6, 41.8, 23.8, and 16.9 months for stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 tumors, respectively. Factors independently associated with shorter OS and RFS were R1 resections and AJCC stages 3 and 4. Notably, AJCC 3-N2 and AJCC 3-T4 tumors had a median OS of 20 months versus 29.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite frequently presenting with advanced disease, oncologic outcomes in EOPC patients are satisfactory even in locally advanced cancers, justifying aggressive surgical approaches. Further research is needed to tailor current guidelines to this rare population.

Multi-omic characterization reveals a distinct molecular landscape in young-onset pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Using a real-world database with matched genomic-transcriptomic molecular data, we sought to characterize the distinct molecular correlates underlying clinical differences between young-onset pancreatic cancer (YOPC; <50-yrs.) and average-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC; ≥70-yrs.) patients.

Methods

We analyzed matched whole-transcriptome and DNA sequencing data from 2430 patient samples (YOPC, n=292; AOPC, n=2138) from the Caris Life Sciences database (Phoenix, AZ). Immune deconvolution was performed using the quanTIseq pipeline. Overall survival (OS) data was obtained from insurance claims (n=4928); Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for age-and molecularly-defined cohorts. Significance was determined as FDR-corrected P -values ( Q )<0.05.

Results

YOPC patients had higher proportions of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), BRCA2 -mutant, and PALB2 -mutant tumors compared with AOPC patients, but fewer SMAD4-, RNF43-, CDKN2A- , and SF3B1- mutant tumors. Notably, YOPC patients demonstrated significantly lower incidence of KRAS mutations compared with AOPC patients (81.3% vs. 90.9%; Q =0.004). In the KRAS- wildtype subset (n=227), YOPC tumors demonstrated fewer TP53 mutations and were more likely driven by NRG1 and MET fusions, while BRAF fusions were exclusively observed in AOPC patients. Immune deconvolution revealed significant enrichment of natural killer (NK) cells, CD8 + T cells, monocytes, and M2 macrophages in YOPC patients relative to AOPC patients, which corresponded with lower rates of HLA-DPA1 homozygosity. There was an association with improved OS in YOPC patients compared with AOPC patients with KRAS -wildtype tumors (median 16.2 [YOPC- KRAS WT ] vs. 10.6 [AOPC- KRAS WT ] months; P =0.008) but not KRAS -mutant tumors ( P =0.084).

Conclusion

In this large, real-world multi-omic characterization of age-stratified molecular differences in PDAC, YOPC is associated with a distinct molecular landscape that has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and survival outcomes of early-onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a rare and refractory malignancy. Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC), defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, is very rare. Clinical presentation and oncological outcomes of EOPC are confusing according to previous studies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, population-based study by querying the SEER database to analyze patients with PDAC from 2004 to 2018. Data on demographics, pathological characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were compared between EOPC and pancreatic cancer in older patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the potential bias of baseline characteristics between the two groups. The effect of age on changes in treatment modalities was evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

RESULTS

The entire study enrolled 42,414 patients, including 2,916 (6.9%) patients with EOPC. Patients with EOPC were more likely to be male (56.6% vs. 51.0%, P < 0.001) and more frequently to present with a larger tumor size (40 mm vs. 37 mm, P < 0.001), vascular invasion (28.6% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.022) and distant metastasis (56.2% vs. 50.8%, P < 0.001) compared with older group. However, surgical resection rates (29.3% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.284) were fairly comparable, and most clinicopathologic characteristics were similar in the patients underwent resection. Younger patients had longer 5-year overall survival (6.9% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001) and 5-year cancer-specific survival (8.4% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.001) among the overall cohort but had comparable prognosis among patients received surgery (both P > 0.05). Similar survival outcomes were obtained after PSM. In addition, operated patients tended to receive fewer systemic treatments at an increasing age (P_trend < 0.001). The survival analysis, which was stratified by age groups, suggested that younger patients only had a better prognosis than those over 70.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EOPC exhibited an advanced stage and a male predilection at diagnosis in the overall cohort but broadly similar clinicopathologic characteristics in the operated patients. In the surgical cohort, although younger patients were more likely to receive systemic treatment, patients with EOPC presented comparable outcomes compared with elderly patients. We suggest that more research should be conducted to uncover the unique characteristics of EOPC for better clinical management.

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of young-onset versus average onset pancreatico-biliary adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Young-onset gastrointestinal malignancies appear to be increasing in incidence. There are limited data on young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA).

METHODS

The study comprised patients with PBA (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, intra-, and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma) and included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2017. YO-PBA was defined as a diagnosis at age less than 50 years. Logistic regression to assess factors associated with YO-PBA status, and cox proportional hazards modeling to associate relevant factors with overall survival was performed.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 360,764 patients, with 20,822 (5.8%) YO-PBA. YO-PBA was associated with (p-values<0.0001 for all): male sex (6.3% YO-male out of all male patients vs. 5.2% YO-female, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.33), Black race (7.9% YO-Black vs. 5.0% YO-White, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.64-1.80), lower income (6.4% YO-lowest household income based group vs. 5.5% highest, OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13). YO-PBA were more likely to present with stage-IV disease (6.4% YO-Stage IV of all stage IV vs. 5.4% YO-Stage I-III, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21-1.29 p-value < 0.0001). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) in non-operable patients included-sex - male vs. female, HR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.15); race - Black vs. White, HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.42); income group - lowest vs. highest, HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.27-1.39), and treatment center type - academic vs. nonacademic center, HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic factors significantly impact incidence and outcomes for young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA). More work is needed to help understand the mechanisms involved while addressing the disparities.

Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer

Background

The prognostic performance of four lymph node classifications, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and examined lymph nodes (ELN) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) remains unclear.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with EOPC from 2004 to 2016. 1048 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 733) and validation sets (n = 315). The predictive abilities of the four lymph node staging systems were compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram based on lymph node classification with the strongest predictive ability was established. The nomogram’s precision was verified by the C-index, calibration curves, and AUC. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare differences in survival at each stage of the nomogram.

Results

Compared with the 8th N stage, LODDS, and ELN, LNR had the highest C-index and AUC and the lowest AIC. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LODDS, LNR were independent risk factors associated with cancer specific survival (CSS), but not ELN. In the training set, the AUC values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS of the nomogram were 0.663, 0.728, and 0.760, respectively and similar results were observed in the validation set. In addition, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the nomogram was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.

Conclusion

We analyzed the predictive power of the four lymph node staging systems and found that LNR had the strongest predictive ability. Furthermore, the novel nomogram prognostic staging mode based on LNR was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.

Practical Considerations in Diagnosing and Managing Early-Onset GI Cancers

The incidence of early-onset (EO) GI cancers occurring in individuals younger than age 50 years has been rising at an alarming rate over the past two decades. Although this rise in incidence among young patients correlates with increased rates of obesity, changes in diet, and alterations in the environment, the effects of these environmental factors on carcinogenesis, metastasis, and treatment response are unknown. Although several unique clinical trends exist among EO-GI cancers and their average-onset GI cancer counterparts, GI cancers are molecularly indistinct between younger and older patients, and no data support distinct treatment paradigms for patients with EO disease. The majority of EO-GI cancers are not explained by germline changes. There remains a critical need for further research to understand the pathogenesis and optimal management of EO-GI cancers. In addition, current screening strategies are not adequate to identify EO-GI cancers, and early biomarkers are needed. Specialized centers, with a focus on psychosocial aspects of cancer management, can address the unique care needs of patients with EO-GI cancers.

Early-onset pancreatic cancer: Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

Early-onset pancreatic cancer (≤50 years, EOPC) is uncommon. This study aims to characterize the clinical and survival characteristics of EOPC in comparison to late-onset pancreatic cancer (>50 years, LOPC).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated consecutive PC patients treated at our institution between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed and compared clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of EOPC and LOPC.

RESULTS

Of 1646 PC patients identified (768 resectable/borderline resectable; 248 locally advanced; 630 metastatic), 127 (8%) had EOPC. Current smoking and heavy drinking were associated with EOPC. EOPC presented at a more advanced stage and had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios than LOPC. Survival outcomes were similar between the two groups, both in the entire cohort and in each resectability group. In patients undergoing resection, EOPC tended to have a higher N stage (p = 0.099) and had a higher pathological stage (stage IV, 20% vs. 7%, p = 0.005) and a lower rate of macroscopically curative resection (80% vs. 93%, p = 0.006). Liver recurrence was more commonly observed in EOPC (42% vs. 23%, p = 0.015). In the metastatic cohort, combination chemotherapy regimens were more frequently administered in EOPC as first-line treatment (79% vs. 64%, p = 0.028). Both median PFS (4.4 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.647) and OS (11.5 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.183) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EOPC presented with a more aggressive tumor biology. Survival outcomes were similar to LOPC due to more intensive treatment.

The Survival Effect of Radiotherapy on Stage IIB/III Pancreatic Cancer Undergone Surgery in Different Age and Tumor Site Groups: A Propensity Scores Matching Analysis Based on SEER Database

Background

It remains controversial whether radiotherapy (RT) improves survival in patients with stage IIB/III PDAC. A growing number of studies have found that patients’ age at diagnosis and tumor site not only affect prognosis, but also may lead to different treatment responses. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to verify whether the survival effect of radiotherapy in patients with stage IIB/III PDAC varies across age and tumor site groups.

Methods

The target population was selected from PDAC patients undergone surgery in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016. This study performed the Pearson’s chi-square test, Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method, and focused on propensity frequency matching analysis.

Results

Neither neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) nor adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) patient group had probably improved survival among early-onset patients. For middle-aged patients, nRT seemed to fail to extend overall survival (OS), while aRT might improve the OS. Plus, both nRT and aRT were associated with improved survival in elderly patients. The aRT might be related with survival benefits in patients with pancreatic head cancer, while nRT was not. And RT in patients with PDAC at other sites did not appear to provide a survival benefit.

Conclusion

Carefully selected data from the SEER database suggested that age and tumor location may be the reference factors to guide the selection of RT for patients with stage IIB/III PDAC. These findings are likely to contribute to the development of personalized treatment for patients with stage IIB/III PDAC.

Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Early-Onset Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer is being diagnosed more frequently in younger individuals. However, limited insight exists into the magnitude of this increase, which subgroups are most affected, and which treatments are utilized in this population. In our study, we aimed to characterize which, and how, subgroups in the United States were affected by pancreatic cancer from 2000 to 2016. Additionally, we aimed to show which therapies were used to treat young patients with pancreatic cancer. Our findings provide valuable information regarding which subgroups face higher rates of this disease and what therapies have historically been used for treatment. Clinicians, scientists, policymakers, and the general population can use this information to develop programs to educate and identify individuals who are at risk for developing pancreatic cancer at an early age, as well as to study whether younger patients should be treated differently than older patients.

Abstract

Background: Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) is relatively uncommon. It is unclear if the incidence of EOPC is evolving and how these patients are treated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study using SEER 2004–2016. We evaluated annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAIR), stage at presentation, and race/ethnicity among 7802 patients plus treatment patterns in 7307 patients (excluding neuroendocrine tumors) younger than 50. Results: The AAIR was higher in males while the rate increased faster in females. The AAIR was highest in Non-Hispanic Black patients and increased for all races/ethnicities over time. The percentage of patients diagnosed with distant-stage disease decreased over time but increased for localized-stage disease. Hispanic patients made up a larger proportion of patients over time compared to other groups. For localized-stage disease, primary surgery alone was the most utilized modality of therapy. For regional-stage disease, chemotherapy with radiation was the most utilized modality from 2004–2010, whereas chemotherapy alone was the most utilized from 2011–2016. For distant-stage disease, chemotherapy alone was the most utilized and used increasingly over time. Patients with EOPC received radiation and chemotherapy at similar rates to, and underwent surgery more frequently, than patients 50–69. Conclusions: The AAIR of EOPC increased over time, faster so in females. Groups who experience a higher burden of pancreatic cancer, particularly African Americans, experienced a higher burden of EOPC. Treatment of localized and regional-stage disease did not follow standard treatment guidelines for pancreatic cancer. Our findings indicate that EOPC patients received more treatment than their older counterparts.