1
|
Bronk JK, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Safwat A, Daw NC, Rainusso N, Mahajan A, Grosshans DR, Paulino AC. Comprehensive radiotherapy for pediatric Ewing Sarcoma: Outcomes of a prospective proton study. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110270. [PMID: 38583721 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients with Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) are treated with multimodality therapy which includes radiation therapy (RT) as an option for local control. We report on the efficacy after proton radiation therapy (PRT) to the primary site for localized and metastatic EWS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-two children with EWS (33 localized, 9 metastatic) treated between 2007 and 2020 were enrolled on 2 prospective registry protocols for pediatric patients undergoing PRT. PRT was delivered by passive scatter (74 %), pencil-beam scanning (12 %) or mixed technique (14 %). Treated sites included the spine (45 %), pelvis/sacrum (26 %), skull/cranium (14 %), extraosseous (10 %), and chest wall (5 %). Median radiation dose was 54 Gy-RBE (range 39.6-55.8 Gy-RBE). Patients with metastatic disease received consolidative RT to metastatic sites (4 at the time of PRT to the primary site, 5 after completion of chemotherapy). Median follow-up time was 47 months after PRT. RESULTS The 4-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 83 %, 71 %, and 86 %, respectively. All local failures (n = 6) were in-field failures. Tumor size ≥ 8 cm predicted for inferior 4-year LC (69 % vs 95 %, p = 0.04). 4-year PFS and OS rates were not statistically different in patients with localized versus metastatic disease (72 % vs 67 %, p = 0.70; 89 % vs 78 %, p = 0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION In conclusion, LC for pediatric patients with EWS treated with PRT was comparable to that of historical patients who received photon-RT. Tumor size ≥ 8 cm predicted increased risk of local failure. Patients with metastatic disease, including non-pulmonary only metastases, received radiation therapy to all metastatic sites and had favorable survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianna K Bronk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Akmal Safwat
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Najat C Daw
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nino Rainusso
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital Cancer and Hematology Centers, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Savagner J, Ducassou A, Cabarrou B, Hangard G, Gambart M, Bertozzi AI, Baudou E, Boetto S, Larrieu D, Laprie A. Helical tomotherapy craniospinal irradiation in primary brain tumours: Toxicities and outcomes in a peadiatric and adult population. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100777. [PMID: 38628594 PMCID: PMC11019098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective As craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is delivered more frequently by helical tomotherapy (HT) with few reports about late effects, we analysed all patients treated in our centre over an 11-year period. Methods and materials Our study included all patients that underwent CSI by HT, between September 2009 and January 2020, in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Toulouse Cancer Institute. Acute radiotherapy toxicities were reported and medium- to long-term outcomes analysed. Results Among the 79 patients included, 70.9 % were younger than 18 years at diagnosis, the median age was 13 (range: 1-52) at the time of radiation therapy, 67.1 % of patients had medulloblastoma. Half of them (49.4 %) had a metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median dose of CSI was 36 Gy (range, 18-36). Seventy-seven patients received a radiation boost to the original location of the primary tumour (97.5 %), 32 patients also received a boost to their metastatic sites (40.5 %). Median follow-up was 55.5 months (95 %CI = [41.2; 71.8]). The 3-year event-free survival rate was 66.3 % (95 %CI = [54.2; 75.9]). Most patients presented with acute haematological toxicities during CSI (85.9 %), predominantly severe thrombocytopenia (39.7 %). Among the 64 patients assessed for medium- and long-term outcomes, 52 survived and 47 were alive and disease-free at the latest follow-up visit on record. There were 3.8 % secondary tumours: two meningiomas and one diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Adult and paediatric patients respectively presented with secondary cataract (4.3 % vs 22.0 %), persistent hearing disorders (26.1 % vs 29.3 %), pulmonary or cardiac late effects (4.3 % vs 2.4 %), hormonal pituitary gland deficiencies (30.0 % vs 56.8 %) and psycho-cognitive disorders (56.5 % vs 53.7 %). Conclusion CSI dispensed by HT, did not result in any additional acute or late toxicities when compared to 3D-CSI. There was no increase in the secondary tumour rate compared to that reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Savagner
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Ducassou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Bastien Cabarrou
- Department of Biostatistics, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Gregory Hangard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Marion Gambart
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Isabelle Bertozzi
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Eloise Baudou
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Toulouse, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Sergio Boetto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Place du Docteur Baylac, Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Larrieu
- Department of Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Toulouse Cancer Institute (IUCT), 1 avenue Irene Joliot-Curie, 31100 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mak LS, Li X, Chan WYK, Leung AWK, Cheuk DKL, Yuen LYP, So JCC, Ha SY, Liu APY. Case report: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in three pediatric cases with medulloblastoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1364199. [PMID: 38595820 PMCID: PMC11002154 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1364199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children, often requiring intensive multimodal therapy, including chemotherapy with alkylating agents. However, therapy-related complications, such as therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs), can arise, particularly in patients with genetic predisposition syndromes. This case report presents three pediatric cases of medulloblastoma with subsequent development of t-MNs, highlighting the potential role of genetic predisposition and the importance of surveillance for hematological abnormalities in long-term survivors. Case presentation We describe three cases of pediatric medulloblastoma who developed t-MNs after receiving chemotherapy, including alkylating agents. Two of the patients had underlying genetic predisposition syndromes (TP53 pathologic variants). The latency period between initial diagnosis of medulloblastoma and the development of secondary cancer varied among the cases, ranging from 17 to 65 months. The three cases eventually succumbed from secondary malignancy, therapy-related complications and progression of primary disease, respectively. Conclusions This report highlights the potential association between genetic predisposition syndromes and the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in pediatric medulloblastoma survivors. It underscores the importance of surveillance for hematological abnormalities among such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Shun Mak
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xiuling Li
- Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wilson Y. K. Chan
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alex W. K. Leung
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Daniel K. L. Cheuk
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Liz Y. P. Yuen
- Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jason C. C. So
- Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shau Yin Ha
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Anthony P. Y. Liu
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Claude L, Bouter J, Le Quellenec G, Padovani L, Laprie A. Radiotherapy management of paediatric cancers with synchronous metastasis. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:131-140. [PMID: 37633767 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
Cancer in childhood represent 1% of all the new diagnosed cancers. About 30% of children with cancer receive radiation therapy, representing about 600 to 700 patients per year in France. As a consequence, paediatric cancers with synchronous metastasis is a very rare situation in oncology, with usually poor standard of care. However, considerable efforts are made by paediatric oncology scientific societies to offer trials or treatment consensus despite these rare situations. The article proposes to synthesize the radiotherapy management of both primary tumour and synchronous metastasis in the most "common" childhood or adolescent cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Claude
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France.
| | - J Bouter
- Service de radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - G Le Quellenec
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - L Padovani
- Oncology Radiotherapy Department, Aix-Marseille Université, CRCM Inserm, UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, AMU UM105, Genome Instability and Carcinogenesis, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - A Laprie
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yeoh TDYY, Nga V, Kimpo M, Lo SS, Vellayappan B. Intracranial Germ Cell Tumors. Semin Neurol 2023; 43:897-908. [PMID: 37963583 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Intracranial germ cell tumors are rare tumors occurring in adolescents and young adults, which include germinomas and non-germinomatous type germ cell tumors (NGGCT). In the past few decades, cooperative trial groups in Europe and North America have developed successful strategies to improve survival outcomes and decrease treatment-related toxicities. New approaches to establishing diagnosis have deferred the need for radical surgery. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) is above 90% and even patients who present with metastatic germinoma can still be cured with chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation. The combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy is tailored to patients based on grouping and staging. For NGGCT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery for residual disease and radiotherapy can yield a 5-year EFS of 70%. Further strategies should focus on reducing long-term complications while preserving high cure rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teri Danielle You Ying Yeoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Vincent Nga
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Miriam Kimpo
- Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Balamurugan Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu KX, Haas-Kogan DA, Elhalawani H. Radiotherapy for Primary Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: Current Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions. Pediatr Neurosurg 2023; 58:356-366. [PMID: 37703864 DOI: 10.1159/000533777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood. Treatment paradigms for pediatric central nervous system malignancies depend on elements including tumor histology, age of patient, and stage of disease. Radiotherapy is an important modality of treatment for many pediatric central nervous system malignancies. SUMMARY While radiation contributes to excellent overall survival rates for many patients, radiation also carries significant risks of long-term side effects including neurocognitive decline, hearing loss, growth impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, strokes, and secondary malignancies. In recent decades, clinical trials have demonstrated that with better imaging and staging along with more sophisticated radiation planning and treatment set-up verification, smaller treatment volumes can be utilized without decrement in survival. Furthermore, the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton-beam radiotherapy has greatly improved conformality of radiation. KEY MESSAGES Recent changes in radiation treatment paradigms have decreased risks of short- and long-term toxicity for common histologies and in different age groups. Future studies will continue to develop novel radiation regimens to improve outcomes in aggressive central nervous system tumors, integrate molecular subtypes to tailor radiation treatment, and decrease radiation-associated toxicity for long-term survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
García-Marqueta M, Vázquez M, Krcek R, Kliebsch UL, Baust K, Leiser D, van Heerden M, Pica A, Calaminus G, Weber DC. Quality of Life, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Delivered for Intracranial Grade WHO 1-2 Meningioma in Children and Adolescents. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4447. [PMID: 37760417 PMCID: PMC10526222 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of children and adolescents with intracranial meningioma treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Out of a total cohort of 207 intracranial meningioma patients treated with PBS-PT between 1999 and 2022, 10 (4.8%) were children or adolescents aged < 18 years. Median age was 13.9 years (range, 3.2-17.2). Six (60%) children were treated as primary treatment (postoperative PT, n = 4; exclusive PT, n = 2) and four (40%) at the time of tumor recurrence. Acute and late toxicities were registered according to Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE). Quality of life (QoL) before PBS-PT was assessed using PEDQOL questionnaires. Educational, functional, and social aspects after PT were assessed through our in-house developed follow-up surveys. Median follow-up time was 71.1 months (range, 2.5-249.7), and median time to last questionnaire available was 37.6 months (range, 5.75-112.6). RESULTS Five (50%) children developed local failure (LF) at a median time of 32.4 months (range, 17.7-55.4) after PBS-PT and four (80%) were considered in-field. One patient died of T-cell lymphoma 127.1 months after PBS-PT. Estimated 5-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rates were 19.4% and 100.0%, respectively. Except for one patient who developed a cataract requiring surgery, no grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported. Before PT, patients rated their QoL lower than their parents in most domains. During the first year after PT, one child required educational support, one needed to attend to a special school, one had social problems and another three children required assistance for daily basic activities (DBA). Three years after PT, only one child required assistance for DBA. CONCLUSIONS The outcome of children with intracranial meningioma treated with PBS-PT is in line with other centers who have reported results of radiation therapy delivered to this particular patient group. This therapy provides acceptable functional status profiles with no high-grade adverse radiation-induced events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta García-Marqueta
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
| | - Miriam Vázquez
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
| | - Reinhardt Krcek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike L. Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
| | - Katja Baust
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
| | - Michelle van Heerden
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
| | - Gabriele Calaminus
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Damien C. Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (M.G.-M.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soffietti R, Pellerino A, Bruno F, Mauro A, Rudà R. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10669. [PMID: 37445846 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Research regarding the mechanisms of brain damage following radiation treatments for brain tumors has increased over the years, thus providing a deeper insight into the pathobiological mechanisms and suggesting new approaches to minimize this damage. This review has discussed the different factors that are known to influence the risk of damage to the brain (mainly cognitive disturbances) from radiation. These include patient and tumor characteristics, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy versus particle therapy (protons, carbon ions), and stereotactic radiotherapy in various modalities. Additionally, biological mechanisms behind neuroprotection have been elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mauro
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
- I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Division of Neurology and Neuro-Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital, 28824 Piancavallo, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giovannini D, De Angelis C, Astorino MD, Fratini E, Cisbani E, Bazzano G, Ampollini A, Piccinini M, Nichelatti E, Trinca E, Nenzi P, Mancuso M, Picardi L, Marino C, Ronsivalle C, Pazzaglia S. In Vivo Radiobiological Investigations with the TOP-IMPLART Proton Beam on a Medulloblastoma Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24098281. [PMID: 37175984 PMCID: PMC10179102 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Protons are now increasingly used to treat pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) patients. We designed and characterized a setup to deliver proton beams for in vivo radiobiology experiments at a TOP-IMPLART facility, a prototype of a proton-therapy linear accelerator developed at the ENEA Frascati Research Center, with the goal of assessing the feasibility of TOP-IMPLART for small animal proton therapy research. Mice bearing Sonic-Hedgehog (Shh)-dependent MB in the flank were irradiated with protons to test whether irradiation could be restricted to a specific depth in the tumor tissue and to compare apoptosis induced by the same dose of protons or photons. In addition, the brains of neonatal mice at postnatal day 5 (P5), representing a very small target, were irradiated with 6 Gy of protons with two different collimated Spread-Out Bragg Peaks (SOBPs). Apoptosis was visualized by immunohistochemistry for the apoptotic marker caspase-3-activated, and quantified by Western blot. Our findings proved that protons could be delivered to the upper part while sparing the deepest part of MB. In addition, a comparison of the effectiveness of protons and photons revealed a very similar increase in the expression of cleaved caspase-3. Finally, by using a very small target, the brain of P5-neonatal mice, we demonstrated that the proton irradiation field reached the desired depth in brain tissue. Using the TOP-IMPLART accelerator we established setup and procedures for proton irradiation, suitable for translational preclinical studies. This is the first example of in vivo experiments performed with a "full-linac" proton-therapy accelerator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Giovannini
- ENEA SSPT-TECS-TEB, Casaccia Research Center, Division of Health Protection Technology (TECS), Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - Cinzia De Angelis
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Denise Astorino
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Emiliano Fratini
- ENEA SSPT-TECS-TEB, Casaccia Research Center, Division of Health Protection Technology (TECS), Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - Evaristo Cisbani
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bazzano
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ampollini
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Massimo Piccinini
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-MNF, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Enrico Nichelatti
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-MNF, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - Emiliano Trinca
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Paolo Nenzi
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Mancuso
- ENEA SSPT-TECS-TEB, Casaccia Research Center, Division of Health Protection Technology (TECS), Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Picardi
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Carmela Marino
- ENEA SSPT-TECS-TEB, Casaccia Research Center, Division of Health Protection Technology (TECS), Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - Concetta Ronsivalle
- ENEA FSN-TECFIS-APAM, Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - Simonetta Pazzaglia
- ENEA SSPT-TECS-TEB, Casaccia Research Center, Division of Health Protection Technology (TECS), Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen Z, Dominello MM, Joiner MC, Burmeister JW. Proton versus photon radiation therapy: A clinical review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1133909. [PMID: 37064131 PMCID: PMC10091462 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1133909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
While proton radiation therapy offers substantially better dose distribution characteristics than photon radiation therapy in certain clinical applications, data demonstrating a quantifiable clinical advantage is still needed for many treatment sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients treated with proton radiation therapy is still comparatively small, in some part due to the lack of evidence of clear benefits over lower-cost photon-based treatments. This review is designed to present the comparative clinical outcomes between proton and photon therapies, and to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of proton radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Chen
- School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Zhe Chen,
| | - Michael M. Dominello
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Jay W. Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vázquez M, Bachmann N, Pica A, Bolsi A, De Angelis C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Early outcome after craniospinal irradiation with pencil beam scanning proton therapy for children, adolescents and young adults with brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30087. [PMID: 36377685 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancies in children and adolescents and young adults (C-AYAs). Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is an essential treatment component for some malignancies, but it can also lead to important toxicity. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) allows for a minimization of dose delivered to organs at risk and, thus, potentially reduced acute and late toxicity. This study aims to report the clinical outcomes and toxicity rates after CSI for C-AYAs treated with PBSPT. Seventy-one C-AYAs (median age: 7.4 years) with CNS tumors were treated with CSI between 2004 and 2021. Medulloblastoma (n = 42: 59%) and ependymoma (n = 8; 11%) were the most common histologies. Median prescribed total PBSPT dose was 54 GyRBE (range: 18-60.4), and median prescribed craniospinal dose was 24 GyRBE (range: 18-36.8). Acute and late toxicities were coded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the estimated 2-year local control, distant control, and overall survival were 86.3%, 80.5%, and 84.7%, respectively. Late grade ≥3 toxicity-free rate was 92.6% at 2 years. Recurrent and metastatic tumors were associated with worse outcome. In conclusion, excellent tumor control with low toxicity rates was observed in C-AYAs with brain tumors treated with CSI using PBSPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Vázquez
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Bachmann
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Claudio De Angelis
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Late Effects of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Electron Spinal Fields for Pediatric Patients With Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:164-173. [PMID: 35716848 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For children, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with photons is associated with significant toxic effects. The use of electrons for spinal fields is hypothesized to spare anterior structures but the long-term effects remain uncertain. We studied late effects of CSI using electrons for spinal radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Records of 84 consecutive patients treated with CSI using electrons for the spine at a single institution between 1983 and 2014 were reviewed. Median age at RT was 5 (range, 1-14) years. The most common histologies were medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (59%) and ependymoma (8%). The median prescribed dose to the entire spine was 30 Gy (range, 6-45). A subset of 48 (57%) patients aged 2 to 14 at RT with clinical follow-up for ≥5 years was analyzed for late effects. Height z scores adjusted for age before and after CSI were assessed using stature-for-age charts and compared with a t test. RESULTS At median follow-up of 19 years (range, 0-38 years), the median survival was 22 years (95% confidence interval, 12-28 years) after RT, with 47 patients (56%) alive at last follow-up. On subset analysis for late effects, 19 (40%) patients developed hypothyroidism and 5 (10%) developed secondary malignancies. Other complications reported were esophageal stricture and periaortic hemorrhage in 1 and restrictive pulmonary disease in 1 patient. Median height z score before treatment was -0.4 (36th percentile; interquartile range, -1.0 to 0.0) and at last follow-up was -2.2 (first percentile; interquartile range, -3.1 to -1.6; P < .001). Of 44 patients with spinal curvature assessments, 15 (34%) had scoliosis with median Cobb angle 15° (range, 10°-35°) and 1 (2%) required surgery. CONCLUSIONS Frequent musculoskeletal toxic effects and predominantly decreased height were seen with long-term follow-up. Scoliosis and hypothyroidism were each seen in at least one-third of long-term survivors. However, clinically evident esophageal, pulmonary, and cardiac toxic effects were infrequent.
Collapse
|
13
|
Upadhyay R, Yadav D, Venkatesulu BP, Singh R, Baliga S, Raval RR, Lazow MA, Salloum R, Fouladi M, Mardis ER, Zaorsky NG, Trifiletti DM, Paulino AC, Palmer JD. Risk of secondary malignant neoplasms in children following proton therapy vs. photon therapy for primary CNS tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:893855. [PMID: 36033525 PMCID: PMC9413159 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.893855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Central nervous system tumors are now the most common primary neoplasms seen in children, and radiation therapy is a key component in management. Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) are rare, but dreaded complications. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially minimize the risk of SMNs compared to conventional photon radiation therapy (RT), and multiple recent studies with mature data have reported the risk of SMNs after PBT. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize and compare the incidence of SMNs after proton and photon-based radiation for pediatric CNS tumors. Methods A systematic search of literature on electronic (PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase) databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We included studies reporting the incidence and nature of SMNs in pediatric patients with primary CNS tumors. The crude incidence of SMNs and all secondary neoplasms were separately extracted, and the random-effects model was used for pooled analysis and subgroup comparison was performed between studies using photons vs. protons. Results Twenty-four studies were included for analysis. A total of 418 SMNs were seen in 38,163 patients. The most common SMN were gliomas (40.6%) followed by meningiomas (38.7%), sarcomas (4.8%), and thyroid cancers (4.2%). The median follow-up was 8.8 years [3.3–23.2].The median latency to SMN for photons and protons were 11.9 years [5-23] and 5.9 years [5-6.7], respectively. The pooled incidence of SMNs was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.1%–2.6%, I2 = 94%) with photons and 1.5% (95% CI: 0%–4.5%, I2 = 81%) with protons. The pooled incidence of all SNs was not different [photons: 3.6% (95% CI: 2.5%–4.8%, I2 = 96%) vs. protons: 1.5% (95% CI: 0–4.5%, I2 = 80%); p = 0.21]. Conclusion We observed similar rates of SMN with PBT at 1.5% compared to 1.8% with photon-based RT for pediatric CNS tumors. We observed a shorter latency to SMN with PBT compared to RT. With increasing use of pencil beam scanning PBT and VMAT, further studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of secondary cancers in patients treated with these newer modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Divya Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Margot A. Lazow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ralph Salloum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Elaine R. Mardis
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Nicholas G. Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Arnold C. Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Joshua D. Palmer,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Franceschi E, Giannini C, Furtner J, Pajtler KW, Asioli S, Guzman R, Seidel C, Gatto L, Hau P. Adult Medulloblastoma: Updates on Current Management and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153708. [PMID: 35954372 PMCID: PMC9367316 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant embryonal tumor of the posterior fossa belonging to the family of primitive neuro-ectodermic tumors (PNET). MB generally occurs in pediatric age, but in 14–30% of cases, it affects the adults, mostly below the age of 40, with an incidence of 0.6 per million per year, representing about 0.4–1% of tumors of the nervous system in adults. Unlike pediatric MB, robust prospective trials are scarce for the post-puberal population, due to the low incidence of MB in adolescent and young adults. Thus, current MB treatments for older patients are largely extrapolated from the pediatric experience, but the transferability and applicability of these paradigms to adults remain an open question. Adult MB is distinct from MB in children from a molecular and clinical perspective. Here, we review the management of adult MB, reporting the recent published literature focusing on the effectiveness of upfront chemotherapy, the development of targeted therapies, and the potential role of a reduced dose of radiotherapy in treating this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Franceschi
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Caterina Giannini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 59005, USA;
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Kristian W. Pajtler
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofia Asioli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
- Pituitary Unit, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Raphael Guzman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Oncology, AUSL of Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit & Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93055 Regensburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Upadhyay R, Liao K, Grosshans DR, McGovern SL, Frances McAleer M, Zaky W, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Nana Yeboa D, Paulino AC. Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1571-1581. [PMID: 35157767 PMCID: PMC9435496 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brainstem toxicity after radiation therapy (RT) is a devastating complication and a particular concern with proton radiation (PBT). We investigated the incidence and clinical correlates of brainstem injury in pediatric brain tumors treated with PBT. METHODS All patients <21 years with brain tumors treated with PBT at our institution from 2007-2019, with a brainstem Dmean >30 Gy and/or Dmax >50.4 Gy were included. Symptomatic brainstem injury (SBI) was defined as any new or progressive cranial neuropathy, ataxia, and/or motor weakness with corresponding radiographic abnormality within brainstem. RESULTS A total of 595 patients were reviewed and 468 (medulloblastoma = 200, gliomas = 114, ependymoma = 87, ATRT = 43) met our inclusion criteria. Median age at RT was 6.3 years and median prescribed RT dose was 54Gy [RBE]. Fifteen patients (3.2%) developed SBI, at a median of 4 months after RT. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 5 brainstem injuries were seen in 7, 5, 1, and 2 patients respectively. Asymptomatic radiographic changes were seen in 51 patients (10.9%). SBI was significantly higher in patients with age ≤3 years, female gender, ATRT histology, patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue, and those not receiving craniospinal irradiation. Patients with SBI had a significantly higher V50-52. In 2014, our institution started using strict brainstem dose constraints (Dmax ≤57 Gy, Dmean ≤52.4 Gy, and V54≤10%). There was a trend towards decrease in SBI from 4.4% (2007-2013) to 1.5% (2014-2019) (P = .089) without affecting survival. CONCLUSION Our results suggest a low risk of SBI after PBT for pediatric brain tumors, comparable to photon therapy. A lower risk was seen after adopting strict brainstem dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Centre Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kaiping Liao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wafik Zaky
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Corresponding Author: Arnold C. Paulino, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX 77030, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Normal tissue exposure and second malignancy risk in vertebral-body-sparing craniospinal irradiation. Med Dosim 2022; 47:142-145. [PMID: 34996678 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare dose to anterior organs at risk (OARs) and quantify the risk of developing secondary malignancy (SMN) in pediatric patients treated with vertebral-body-sparing (VBS) vs vertebral body (VB) pencil beam scanning proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Comparative plans of VBS and VB CSI were created for 10 previously treated patients. Dose-volume histograms were used to evaluate dose to OARs. Absolute excess risk of SMN was calculated according to the organ-specific, radiation-induced cancer incidence based on the organ equivalent dose. OAR dosimetric parameters and absolute excess risk of SMN were compared for VBS and VB plans using the Kruskal-Wallis H test (α = 0.05). VBS CSI leads to significantly lower radiation dose to the heart, esophagus, kidney, liver and bowel. Excluding the vertebral body also significantly decreases the absolute excess risk of SMN for liver, esophagus and bowel. For these reasons, implementation of VBS pencil beam scanning proton CSI should be considered.
Collapse
|
17
|
Seidel C, Heider S, Hau P, Glasow A, Dietzsch S, Kortmann RD. Radiotherapy in Medulloblastoma-Evolution of Treatment, Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235945. [PMID: 34885055 PMCID: PMC8657317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is the backbone of medulloblastoma treatment and the first treatment to achieve a cure in many patients. Within the last decades, significant efforts have been made to enhance efficacy in combination with chemotherapy. With this approach, a majority of low- and standard-risk patients can be cured. In parallel, many clinical trials have dealt with CSI-dose reduction and reduction of boost volume in order to decrease long-term toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity. Within these trials, standardized quality assurance has helped to increase the accuracy of treatment and improve prognosis. More recently, advances of radiotherapy techniques such as proton treatment allowed for better sparing of healthy tissue in order to further diminish detrimental long-term effects. Major future challenges are the adaption of radiotherapy regimens to different molecularly defined disease groups alone or together with new targeted agents. Moreover, and even more importantly, innovative combinatorial treatments are needed in high- and very-high risk situations. Abstract Medulloblastoma is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children. During the last decades, the therapeutic landscape has changed significantly with craniospinal irradiation as the backbone of treatment. Survival times have increased and treatments were stratified according to clinical and later molecular risk factors. In this review, current evidence regarding the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in medulloblastoma is summarized and discussed mainly based on data of controlled trials. Current concepts and future perspectives based on current risk classification are outlined. With the introduction of CSI, medulloblastoma has become a curable disease. Due to combination with chemotherapy, survival rates have increased significantly, allowing for a reduction in radiation dose and a decrease of toxicity in low- and standard-risk patients. Furthermore, modern radiotherapy techniques are able to avoid side effects in a fragile patient population. However, high-risk patients remain with relevant mortality and many patients still suffer from treatment related toxicity. Treatment needs to be continually refined with regard to more efficacious combinatorial treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sina Heider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Annegret Glasow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Stefan Dietzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (S.H.); (A.G.); (S.D.); (R.-D.K.)
| |
Collapse
|