Black-White racial disparities in health care utilization and self-reported health among cancer survivors: The role of food insecurity

Excess risk of chronic health conditions in Hispanic survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers

PURPOSE

There is a growing population of survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers (age 15-39 years at diagnosis). Studies in AYA cancer survivors have identified racial and ethnic disparities in long-term outcomes. To understand the extent to which a cancer diagnosis exacerbates pre-existent health disparities within a minoritized population, comparisons should be made to those of the same race or ethnicity without a cancer history.

METHODS

Self-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey (2009-2018) were used to identify Hispanic AYA cancer survivors and Hispanic age- and sex-matched controls. SES factors (marital status, income, education, insurance) and prevalence of chronic health conditions were compared between groups using chi-square tests. The log-odds of chronic conditions were modeled by survey-weighted logistic regression with relation to age at survey, sex, marital status, education, family income, and cancer group (control versus cancer), together with interactions between each variable and cancer group (survivors vs. controls).

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-nine survivors and 5390 controls were included. Compared with controls, survivors were less likely to be married and have family income > 45 K/year, and more likely to be insured and have completed some college. Survivors had higher odds than controls of chronic health conditions (odds ratio (OR): 7.39, p < 0.001 for at least 1 and OR: 4.78, p < 0.001 for 3 or more) including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Female sex, higher educational attainment, and public insurance were each associated with increased odds of chronic conditions in Hispanic AYA survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

An AYA cancer diagnosis is associated with poor SES outcomes and increased odds of comorbidities within the Hispanic population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Cancer history can exacerbate underlying health disparities. Screening for chronic conditions is especially important in minoritized populations.

Age at diagnosis and social risks among Black cancer survivors: Results from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort

BACKGROUND

Social risks are common among cancer survivors who have the fewest financial resources; however, little is known about how prevalence differs by age at diagnosis, despite younger survivors' relatively low incomes and wealth.

METHODS

The authors used data from 3703 participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort of Black cancer survivors. Participants self-reported several forms of social risks, including food insecurity, housing instability, utility shut-offs, not getting care because of cost or lack of transportation, and feeling unsafe in their home neighborhood. Modified Poisson models were used to estimate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of social risks by age at diagnosis, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 35% of participants reported at least one social risk, and 17% reported two or more risks. Social risk prevalence was highest among young adults aged 20-39 years (47%) followed by those aged 40-54 years (43%), 55-64 years (38%), and 65 years and older (24%; p for trend < .001). Compared with survivors who were aged 65 years and older at diagnosis, adjusted prevalence ratios for any social risk were 1.75 (95% CI, 1.42-2.16) for survivors aged 20-39 years, 1.76 (95% CI, 1.52-2.03) for survivors aged 40-54 years, and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.23-1.60) for survivors aged 55-64 years at diagnosis. Similar associations were observed for individual social risks and experiencing two or more risks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of Black cancer survivors, social risks were inversely associated with age at diagnosis. Diagnosis in young adulthood and middle age should be considered a risk factor for social risks and should be prioritized in work to reduce the financial effects of cancer on financially vulnerable cancer survivors.

Excess risk of chronic health conditions in Black adolescent and young adult cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

The US population of adolescent and young adult (age 15-39 years at diagnosis) cancer survivors is growing. Previous studies have identified racial and ethnic disparities in survival and health outcomes in racially minoritized survivors, including Black survivors, compared with White survivors. However, comparisons should be made between those of the same race or ethnicity with and without a history of AYA cancer to fully understand the association of a cancer diagnosis with socioeconomic status (SES) and health outcomes within a minoritized population.

METHODS

Non-Hispanic Black AYA cancer survivors and non-Hispanic Black age- and sex-matched controls were identified from self-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey (2009-2018). SES factors and chronic health conditions prevalence were compared between survivors and controls using chi-square tests. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were used to determine odds of chronic conditions by SES factors within and between survivors and controls. Interactions between each variable and cancer group were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 445 survivors and 4450 controls were included. Survivors were less likely than controls to be married, have family income >45K/year, have completed a bachelor's degree or higher, and have private insurance. Survivors had higher odds than controls of having at least one (odds ratio (OR): 7.02, p<0.001) and ≥3 (OR: 4.44, p<0.001) chronic conditions. Survivors had higher odds of each chronic condition assessed including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Survivors had higher odds of having chronic health conditions compared with controls across all SES variables.

CONCLUSIONS

A cancer diagnosis during adolescence and young adulthood is associated with poor SES outcomes and increased odds of comorbidities within the Black population, thus further exacerbating existing disparities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Black AYA cancer survivors have a very high risk of developing chronic health conditions after cancer treatment and interventions are needed to improve long-term health outcomes for this population.

Oncology registered dietitian nutritionists' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to food insecurity among cancer patients: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Understanding the knowledge, attitudes and practices pertaining to food insecurity among oncology Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs) is critical to ensuring that cancer survivors have adequate nutrition-a fundamental component of successful treatment and recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively assess Oncology RDN's knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the food access needs of their patients using a qualitative semantic approach to thematic analysis.

DESIGN

The qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2018 to January 2019.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Forty-one oncology RDNs working with cancer survivors in various clinical settings across the U.S participated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed a semi-structured, in-depth interview via telephone, lasting an average of 49 minutes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Two coders (primary and secondary) trained in qualitative thematic data analysis methods used a semantic approach to thematic analysis to analyze transcripts. A qualitative and mixed methods online coding program, Dedoose, was used to organize and analyze the data.

RESULTS

Participants defined FI as a lack of access to nutritious foods and a lack of resources to purchase nutritious foods. RDNs stated they believe FI is a serious problem in the U.S., has a greater impact on cancer survivors than healthy individuals and they have specific concerns about FI among their own patients. Despite their concerns, most expressed that they do not use a validated tool to identify FI, nor were they aware that any exists. Only a small proportion of the RDNs stated that they regularly ask patients about their food access needs.

CONCLUSIONS

While Oncology RDNs have heard of FI, they do not routinely assess patients' food security status with a validated tool, nor do they consistently ask patients directly about their food access needs. These findings suggest there is a need for developing education and training opportunities for oncology RDNs in order to enhance their ability to screen for and address FI with their patients.