1
|
Varilek BM, Mollman S. Healthcare professionals' perspectives of barriers to cancer care delivery for American Indian, rural, and frontier populations. PEC INNOVATION 2024; 4:100247. [PMID: 38225930 PMCID: PMC10788248 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Objective This descriptive qualitative study sought to understand the barriers affecting cancer care delivery from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) serving American Indian (AI), rural, and frontier populations. Methods One-on-one, semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary HCPs (N = 18) who provide cancer care to AI, rural, and frontier populations were conducted between January and April 2022. Interviews were conducted via Zoom. Data were analyzed following thematic content analysis methodologies. Results Thematic content analysis revealed three major themes: (a) Access, (b) Time, and (c) Isolation. The themes represent the HCP perspectives of the needs and barriers of persons with cancer to whom they provide cancer care. Furthermore, these themes also reflect the barriers HCPs experience while providing cancer care to AI, rural and frontier populations. Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence for the need and strong multidisciplinary support for an early palliative care intervention in rural and frontier South Dakota (SD). This intervention could support the needs of persons with advanced cancer as well as the HCPs delivering cancer care in rural settings. Innovation This study is the initial step to develop the first culturally responsive, nurse-led, early palliative care intervention for AI, rural, and frontier persons with advanced cancer in SD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M. Varilek
- South Dakota State University, College of Nursing, 2300 North Career Ave, Suite 260, Sioux Falls, SD 57107, USA
| | - Sarah Mollman
- South Dakota State University, College of Nursing – Office of Nursing Research, 1011 11 St, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosa WE, Garcia CA, Mardones MA, Temin S, Sanders JJ. Integrating Health Equity in the ASCO Guideline Agenda: Recommendations From Members of the Palliative Care Expert Panel. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400291. [PMID: 39133878 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sarah Temin
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanders JJ, Temin S, Ghoshal A, Alesi ER, Ali ZV, Chauhan C, Cleary JF, Epstein AS, Firn JI, Jones JA, Litzow MR, Lundquist D, Mardones MA, Nipp RD, Rabow MW, Rosa WE, Zimmermann C, Ferrell BR. Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2336-2357. [PMID: 38748941 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based guidance to oncology clinicians, patients, nonprofessional caregivers, and palliative care clinicians to update the 2016 ASCO guideline on the integration of palliative care into standard oncology for all patients diagnosed with cancer. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical, radiation, hematology-oncology, oncology nursing, palliative care, social work, ethics, advocacy, and psycho-oncology experts. The Panel conducted a literature search, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 2015-2023. Outcomes of interest included quality of life (QOL), patient satisfaction, physical and psychological symptoms, survival, and caregiver burden. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 52 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations address the integration of palliative care in oncology. Oncology clinicians should refer patients with advanced solid tumors and hematologic malignancies to specialized interdisciplinary palliative care teams that provide outpatient and inpatient care beginning early in the course of the disease, alongside active treatment of their cancer. For patients with cancer with unaddressed physical, psychosocial, or spiritual distress, cancer care programs should provide dedicated specialist palliative care services complementing existing or emerging supportive care interventions. Oncology clinicians from across the interdisciplinary cancer care team may refer the caregivers (eg, family, chosen family, and friends) of patients with cancer to palliative care teams for additional support. The Expert Panel suggests early palliative care involvement, especially for patients with uncontrolled symptoms and QOL concerns. Clinicians caring for patients with solid tumors on phase I cancer trials may also refer them to specialist palliative care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Temin
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Alexandria, VA
| | - Arun Ghoshal
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin R Alesi
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | - James F Cleary
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael W Rabow
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Petrillo LA, Jones KF, El-Jawahri A, Sanders J, Greer JA, Temel JS. Why and How to Integrate Early Palliative Care Into Cutting-Edge Personalized Cancer Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e100038. [PMID: 38815187 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_100038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Early palliative care, palliative care integrated with oncology care early in the course of illness, has myriad benefits for patients and their caregivers, including improved quality of life, reduced physical and psychological symptom burden, enhanced prognostic awareness, and reduced health care utilization at the end of life. Although ASCO and others recommend early palliative care for all patients with advanced cancer, widespread implementation of early palliative care has not been realized because of barriers such as insufficient reimbursement and a palliative care workforce shortage. Investigators have recently tested several implementation strategies to overcome these barriers, including triggers for palliative care consultations, telehealth delivery, navigator-delivered interventions, and primary palliative care interventions. More research is needed to identify mechanisms to distribute palliative care optimally and equitably. Simultaneously, the transformation of the oncology treatment landscape has led to shifts in the supportive care needs of patients and caregivers, who may experience longer, uncertain trajectories of cancer. Now, palliative care also plays a clear role in the care of patients with hematologic malignancies and may be beneficial for patients undergoing phase I clinical trials and their caregivers. Further research and clinical guidance regarding how to balance the risks and benefits of opioid therapy and safely manage cancer-related pain across this wide range of settings are urgently needed. The strengths of early palliative care in supporting patients' and caregivers' coping and centering decisions on their goals and values remain valuable in the care of patients receiving cutting-edge personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Petrillo
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Katie Fitzgerald Jones
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- New England Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Jamaica Plain, MA
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Justin Sanders
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, CA
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, CA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen M, Wu VS, Falk D, Cheatham C, Cullen J, Hoehn R. Patient Navigation in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:504-537. [PMID: 38581470 PMCID: PMC11063100 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patient navigation promotes access to timely treatment of chronic diseases by eliminating barriers to care. Patient navigation programs have been well-established in improving screening rates and diagnostic resolution. This systematic review aimed to characterize the multifaceted role of patient navigators within the realm of cancer treatment. RECENT FINDINGS A comprehensive electronic literature review of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant studies investigating the role of patient navigators in cancer treatment from August 1, 2009 to March 27, 2023. Fifty-nine articles were included in this review. Amongst studies focused on cancer treatment initiation, 70% found a significant improvement in treatment initiation amongst patients who were enrolled in patient navigation programs, 71% of studies focused on treatment adherence demonstrated significant improvements in treatment adherence, 87% of studies investigating patient satisfaction showed significant benefits, and 81% of studies reported a positive impact of patient navigators on quality care indicators. Three palliative care studies found beneficial effects of patient navigation. Thirty-seven studies investigated disadvantaged populations, with 76% of them concluded that patient navigators made a positive impact during treatment. This systematic review provides compelling evidence supporting the value of patient navigation programs in cancer treatment. The findings suggest that patient navigation plays a crucial role in improving access to care and optimizing treatment outcomes, especially for disadvantaged cancer patients. Incorporating patient navigation into standard oncology practice can reduce disparities and improve the overall quality of cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Chen
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Victoria S Wu
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Derek Falk
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chesley Cheatham
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Richard Hoehn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patano A, Wyatt G, Lehto R. Palliative and End-of-Life Family Caregiving in Rural Areas: A Scoping Review of Social Determinants of Health and Emotional Well-Being. J Palliat Med 2024. [PMID: 38598274 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Due to their remote location, rural-dwelling family caregivers (FCGs) experience geographic and psychosocial challenges when providing home-based palliative and end-of-life (PEOL) care for their care recipient. Limited research has evaluated the social and environmental factors that may compound FCG burden and contribute to adverse emotional health outcomes among rural-dwelling PEOL FCGs. Objective: To characterize the social determinants of health (SDOH) that affect the provision of PEOL care among rural-dwelling FCGs, along with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's Framework. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane, and 511 articles published between 2010 and 2023 were screened. Keywords included "rural," "PEOL care," and "FCG." Inclusion criteria included FCGs, ages ≥18 years; findings reported on SDOH, anxiety, and/or depressive symptoms; within a rural context; and U.S. based. Findings: In this review, 18 studies met eligibility and were included. Apart from six studies that specifically investigated Black and Latinx FCGs, most FCGs were middle-aged White female spouses. SDOH impacting PEOL care provision included: limited access to PEOL services due to remote distance and travel needs for services; low health literacy in medical terminology and patient symptom management; limited English-language proficiency; perceived clinician racial and ethnic discrimination; financial vulnerabilities affecting health care coverage; and underdeveloped infrastructure. These barriers negatively impacted decision making, communication with clinicians, and patient symptom management. FCGs reported emotional distress related to patients' symptom management and limited opportunities for respite. There was a limited investigation of emotional well-being and minimal interventions aimed toward improving rural-dwelling FCG emotional health. The presence of community support promoted hospice use and facilitated the provision of care. Conclusions: FCGs are vulnerable to adverse emotional health when providing home-based PEOL care. Research is needed to develop supportive interventions (e.g., digital health) for rural-dwelling FCGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arienne Patano
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Gwen Wyatt
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Rebecca Lehto
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang X, Li X, Jiang S, Yu X. Effects of Telemedicine on Informal Caregivers of Patients in Palliative Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12:e54244. [PMID: 38602303 PMCID: PMC11024400 DOI: 10.2196/54244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Telemedicine technology is a rapidly developing field that shows immense potential for improving medical services. In palliative care, informal caregivers assume the primary responsibility in patient care and often face challenges such as increased physical and mental stress and declining health. In such cases, telemedicine interventions can provide support and improve their health outcomes. However, research findings regarding the use of telemedicine among informal caregivers are controversial, and the efficacy of telemedicine remains unclear. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of telemedicine on the burden, anxiety, depression, and quality of life of informal caregivers of patients in palliative care. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, CBM, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials published from inception to March 2023. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the relevant information. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Intervention effects were estimated and sensitivity analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4, whereas 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated using R (version 4.3.2) and RStudio. Results A total of 9 randomized controlled trials were included in this study. The meta-analysis indicated that telemedicine has reduced the caregiving burden (standardized mean differences [SMD] -0.49, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.27; P<.001; 95% PI -0.86 to -0.13) and anxiety (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.06; P=.009; 95% PI -0.98 to 0.39) of informal caregivers; however, it did not affect depression (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.05; P=.11; 95% PI -0.94 to 0.51) or quality of life (SMD 0.35, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.89; P=.21; 95% PI -2.15 to 2.85). Conclusions Although telemedicine can alleviate the caregiving burden and anxiety of informal caregivers, it does not significantly reduce depression or improve their quality of life. Further high-quality, large-sample studies are needed to validate the effects of telemedicine. Furthermore, personalized intervention programs based on theoretical foundations are required to support caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Yang
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xueting Li
- College of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shanshan Jiang
- College of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xinying Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brant JM. Oncology Nurse Navigation in Underserved Communities: Opportunities and Future Directions. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151586. [PMID: 38311537 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Provide an overview of navigation in three disparate populations: rural, Native American/Alaska Native, and low- to middle-income countries. Discuss gaps in care and opportunities to improve cancer care. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed and on Google Scholar using search terms, nurse navigation, cancer, disparit*, low- to middle-income countries, Native American, American Indian, and rural. Peer-reviewed research studies, review articles, databases and websites of professional organizations, and historical books were reviewed to provide an overview of oncology nurse navigation in underserved communities. Experiences in working with these populations over the past 30 years were also provided to support current literature. RESULTS Forty references were included in this overview of nurse navigation in underserved communities. Nurse navigation in these disparate areas is in its infancy. While some programs exist and outcomes have been positive, their dissemination is sparse. A need exists to expand nurse navigation into these areas to provide care for these underserved communities. CONCLUSION Oncology nursing navigation for each of these underserved communities requires a culturally sensitive approach. Many of these approaches are universal to cultural competency and can be applied to most disparate populations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses comprise the largest workforce around the globe and are well-equipped to develop navigation programs in some of the most disparate communities around the world. To do so, it is important to use a foundation of building trust, embracing individual differences, providing culturally sensitive education and resources for growth, and good communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannine M Brant
- Executive Director, Clinical Science & Innovation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rowe JT, Parrillo E, Stanford O, Wenzel J, Johnston FM. Individual and Systemic Barriers Blocking Community Health Workers from Helping the Seriously Ill. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:358-366. [PMID: 38010809 PMCID: PMC10903179 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Palliative care is a valuable component of health care that improves a patient's quality of life, yet its availability to patients with serious chronic illness remains relatively low. Due to their knowledge of community preferences and ability to improve patient education and access to care, community health workers (CHWs) can increase palliative care usage by patients. Notably, barriers to CHWs helping patients with serious chronic illness remain poorly understood. Objective: Explore the perception of barriers CHWs feel they face when attempting to support the health care of patients with serious chronic illness. Design: Qualitative semistructured individual interviews of CHWs and qualitative descriptive analysis. Setting/Subjects: Twelve CHWs who have worked with patients with serious chronic illness were recruited from the Johns Hopkins Healthcare LLC and the Baltimore Alliance for Careers in Healthcare organizations to virtually participate. Results: CHWs perceived both active and passive barriers that obstructed their efforts to work with seriously ill patients. CHWs shared that these barriers were dependent on themselves, their peers, and their work environments. Prevalent themes included interprofessional conflict, poor health care worker understanding of the CHW's role, and lack of access to quality resource organizations. CHWs noted job-specific training, better means to identify needed resources for patients, and inclusive health care teams as solutions to support their professional goals, while helping patients with serious illness. Conclusions: There are multiple perceived barriers to CHWs helping seriously ill patients. CHWs aiding patients with serious illness can be supported through better job training, better resource management tools, and improved communication between health care team members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian T. Rowe
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Elaina Parrillo
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Olivia Stanford
- Community Outreach and Engagement Department, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fabian M. Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lalani N, Hamash K, Wang Y. Palliative care needs and preferences of older adults with advanced or serious chronic illnesses and their families in rural communities of Indiana, USA. J Rural Health 2024; 40:368-375. [PMID: 37526585 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the palliative care needs and preferences of older adults with advanced or serious chronic illnesses and their families. Also, to propose strategies to promote supportive palliative care in the rural communities of Indiana, USA. METHOD We conducted qualitative interviews to gather rural caregivers' experiences of palliative care. Recruitment was done in collaboration with community partners using social media, flyers, emails, invitations, and word-of-mouth. A purposive sample of family caregivers was obtained. All the interviews were conducted online. The average interview was 30-45 minutes. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. FINDINGS Our findings showed 6 major themes that indicated several palliative care needs and preferences of older patients and their families in rural communities that include: (1) difficulties in pain and symptom burden; (2) perceived discrimination and lack of trust; (3) longer distances to care facilities; (4) difficult conversations; (5) caregiving burden; and (6) use of telehealth in a rural palliative care context. CONCLUSION Rural family caregivers experience several social inequities and disparities causing a lack of access to and low utilization of palliative care. All these disparities cause several challenges for patients and their families trying to manage serious illnesses and die in place with peace and comfort. Inadequate access and lack of resources cause pain and distress for both patients and their families. Provider education and trainings, initiating early palliative care models, integrating behavioral health in palliative care, and using culturally congruent care delivery approaches in support of community partners can improve palliative care services in rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasreen Lalani
- School of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Center for Aging and Life Course Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Kawther Hamash
- WellStar School of Nursing, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA
| | - Yitong Wang
- School of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Varilek BM, Doyon K, Vacek S, Isaacson MJ. Palliative and End-of-Life Care Interventions with Minoritized Populations in the US with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024:10499091241232978. [PMID: 38320752 DOI: 10.1177/10499091241232978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past 20 years, palliative care in the United States has grown significantly. Yet, access to and/or engagement with palliative care for minoritized persons with serious illness remains limited. In addition, the focus of palliative and end-of-life care research has not historically focused on equity-informed intervention development that collaborates directly with minoritized populations. Equity-informed interventions within palliative and end-of-life care research have the potential to champion collaborations with persons with serious illness and their families to mitigate health inequities. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine and describe the literature on the approaches used in the design and development of palliative and end-of-life care interventions with minoritized populations with serious illness. METHODS The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was followed for tracking and reporting purposes. Included articles were described quantitatively and analyzed qualitatively with content analysis. RESULTS Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria: eight used quantitative methods, eight used qualitative methods, ten reported a community-based participatory research method, nine used mixed-methods, and two had research designs that could not be determined. The qualitative analysis revealed three themes: (1) stakeholder involvement and feedback, (2) intervention focus, and (3) target intervention population (population vs healthcare clinician). CONCLUSIONS Using an equity-informed research approach is vital to improve palliative and end-of-life care interventions for minoritized communities with serious illness. There is also a need for more robust publishing guidelines related to community-based participatory research methods to ensure publication consistency among research teams that employ this complex research method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Varilek
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | | | - Shelie Vacek
- Wegner Library, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Mary J Isaacson
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ke Y, Cheung YB, Bakitas M, Odom JN, Lum E, Tan DSW, Tan TJ, Finkelstein E, Oh HC, Zhou S, Yang GM. ENABLE-SG (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends for Singapore) as a proactive palliative care model: protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized wait-list controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:29. [PMID: 38287335 PMCID: PMC10826230 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01353-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specialist palliative care is often provided late in the patient's disease trajectory in response to uncontrolled symptoms. Shifting from this reactionary illness-stress paradigm to a proactive health-wellness approach, the ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) telehealth model aims to enhance the coping, stress and symptom management, self-care, and advance care planning skills of patients with advanced cancers and their caregivers. The ENABLE model has been culturally adapted to Singapore (ENABLE-SG) and pilot-tested. A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of ENABLE-SG while collecting real-world implementation data. METHODS This single-centre, assessor-blind, wait-list (immediately vs. 6 months) randomized controlled trial will recruit 300 adult patients within 60 days of an advanced cancer diagnosis and their family caregivers from the National Cancer Centre of Singapore. ENABLE-SG comprises structured psychoeducational sessions with a telehealth coach, covering essential topics of early palliative care. Participants will be assessed at baseline and every 3 months until patient's death, 12 months (caregivers), or end of study (patients). The primary outcome is patient quality of life 6 months after baseline. Secondary patient-reported outcomes include mood, coping, palliative care concerns, and health status. Secondary caregiver-reported outcomes include caregiver quality of life, mood, coping, and care satisfaction. Mixed-effects regression modelling for repeated measurements will be used. To assess the effectiveness of ENABLE-SG versus usual care, patient and caregiver outcomes at 6 months will be compared. To compare earlier versus delayed ENABLE-SG, patient and caregiver outcomes at 12 months will be compared. Within the hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design, implementation outcomes will be evaluated in both the early and delayed groups. Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility will be assessed using a feedback survey and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Transcribed interviews will be analysed thematically. Other implementation outcomes of penetration, fidelity, and cost will be assessed using records of study-related processes and summarized using descriptive statistics. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be conducted. DISCUSSION This study will assess both effectiveness and implementation of ENABLE-SG. Insights into implementation processes can facilitate model expansion and upscaling. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06044441. Registered on 21/09/2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ke
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore
| | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Tampere Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marie Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, UAB Centre for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Nicholas Odom
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, UAB Centre for Palliative and Supportive Care, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Elaine Lum
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Population Health Research & Implementation, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Daniel Shao Weng Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Therapeutics Research Laboratory, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, A*Star, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tira J Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hong Choon Oh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Population Health Research & Implementation, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Services Research, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siqin Zhou
- Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Meijuan Yang
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Livingston PM, Winter N, Ugalde A, Orellana L, Mikocka-Walus A, Jefford M, Zalcberg J, Orford N, Hutchinson AM, Barbour A, Kiss N, Smithers BM, Watson DI, McCaffrey N, White V. iCare - a self-directed, interactive online program to improve health and wellbeing for people living with upper gastrointestinal or hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers, and their informal carers: the study protocol for a Phase II randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:144. [PMID: 38287317 PMCID: PMC10826031 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11861-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 70% of people diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract or hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancers experience substantial reductions in quality of life (QoL), including high distress levels, pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, weight loss and difficulty swallowing. With few advocacy groups and support systems for adults with upper GI or HPB cancers (i.e. pancreas, liver, stomach, bile duct and oesophageal) and their carers, online supportive care programs may represent an alternate cost-effective mechanism to support this patient group and carers. iCare is a self-directed, interactive, online program that provides information, resources, and psychological packages to patients and their carers from the treatment phase of their condition. The inception and development of iCare has been driven by consumers, advocacy groups, government and health professionals. The aims of this study are to determine the feasibility and acceptability of iCare, examine preliminary efficacy on health-related QoL and carer burden at 3- and 6-months post enrolment, and the potential cost-effectiveness of iCare, from health and societal perspectives, for both patients and carers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A Phase II randomised controlled trial. Overall, 162 people with newly diagnosed upper GI or HPB cancers and 162 carers will be recruited via the Upper GI Cancer Registry, online advertisements, or hospital clinics. Patients and carers will be randomly allocated (1:1) to the iCare program or usual care. Participant assessments will be at enrolment, 3- and 6-months later. The primary outcomes are i) feasibility, measured by eligibility, recruitment, response and attrition rates, and ii) acceptability, measured by engagement with iCare (frequency of logins, time spent using iCare, and use of features over the intervention period). Secondary outcomes are patient changes in QoL and unmet needs, and carer burden, unmet needs and QoL. Linear mixed models will be fitted to obtain preliminary estimates of efficacy and variability for secondary outcomes. The economic analysis will include a cost-consequences analysis where all outcomes will be compared with costs. DISCUSSION iCare provides a potential model of supportive care to improve QoL, unmet needs and burden of disease among people living with upper GI or HPB cancers and their carers. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY ACTRN12623001185651. This protocol reflects Version #1 26 April 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia M Livingston
- Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- School of Nursing &, Midwifery Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Natalie Winter
- Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- School of Nursing &, Midwifery Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- School of Nursing &, Midwifery Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Liliana Orellana
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - John Zalcberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health and School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil Orford
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZICS-RC), SPHPM, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alison M Hutchinson
- Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
- School of Nursing &, Midwifery Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Barbour
- Upper GI Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicole Kiss
- Institute for Physical Activity & Nutrition, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Bernard Mark Smithers
- Upper GI Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David I Watson
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu H, Lou VWQ, Xu S. Randomized controlled trials on promoting self-care behaviors among informal caregivers of older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:86. [PMID: 38263091 PMCID: PMC10804633 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04614-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informal caregivers of older patients often neglect their self-care, despite the mental and physical health effects of caregiving. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on self-care interventions for informal caregivers are lacking, making it difficult to determine effective strategies. This systematic review explored the definition and categories of self-care RCTs for informal caregivers and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. METHODS Seven databases (Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched for articles in English reporting on self-care intervention outcomes for informal caregivers of patients aged 60 years or older. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were conducted. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, of which fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. RCTs lacked a clear definition of self-care, mainly focused on promoting physical and mental health and individual capacity, and neglected disease prevention. The interventions focused on self-management for health and individual agency, with less attention on health literacy, decision-making capacity, self-monitoring for health status, and linkage to the health system. Meta-analysis results showed that RCTs had a small effect on reducing anxiety (SMD = -0.142, 95% CI [-0.302, 0.017], p = .081) but a significant effect on reducing depression (SMD = -0.214, 95% CI [-0.353, -0.076], p = .002). Country and type of caregiver significantly contributed to the effect of reducing caregivers' depression in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS Studies on caregiver-centered self-care interventions are limited, resulting in a lack of a clear definition and comprehensive intervention. RCTs indicated a small effect on informal caregivers' mental health, and interventions should consider both mental and physical health. More evidence is needed on the effectiveness of self-care interventions for informal caregivers' anxiety and physical health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanran Liu
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Sau Po Centre On Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Vivian W Q Lou
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- Sau Po Centre On Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Shicheng Xu
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Sau Po Centre On Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Winter N, McKenzie K, Spence D, Lane K, Ugalde A. The experience of bereaved cancer carers in rural and regional areas: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential of peer support. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293724. [PMID: 37934771 PMCID: PMC10629652 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caring for someone with cancer during end of life care can be a challenging and complex experience. Those living in rural and regional areas are less likely to have local healthcare services and may be physically isolated. Even where support services such as respite do exist, they may be less likely to be accessed due to the time burden in travelling to services. This was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. AIM To understand the potential benefits of peer support for bereaved carers of people with cancer from rural and regional locations during the COVID-19 period. METHODS Phone interviews were conducted with bereaved cancer carers living in rural and regional areas in Victoria. Semi-structured interviews were used, and participants were asked about their experience as a carer, bereavement and the potential for peer support. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; transcripts were coded and a thematic analysis was conducted. FINDINGS 12 interviews were conducted. Carers were mostly female (85%) and were on average 58 years of age (range 42-71). Interviews lasted an average of 58 minutes (range 53-91 minutes). Three themes were derived from the data; 1) Supportive care needs while caring and the impact of COVID-19; 2) Isolation during bereavement compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic; and 3) Peer support requires flexibility to meet diverse needs. CONCLUSION Peer support has potential to assist bereaved carers of people with cancer. A co-design approach may be beneficial for developing a flexible model for supporting and linking carers together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Winter
- School of Nursing & Midwifery and Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kerry McKenzie
- Strategy and Support Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Danielle Spence
- Strategy and Support Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Katherine Lane
- Strategy and Support Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- School of Nursing & Midwifery and Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chan RJ, Milch VE, Crawford-Williams F, Agbejule OA, Joseph R, Johal J, Dick N, Wallen MP, Ratcliffe J, Agarwal A, Nekhlyudov L, Tieu M, Al-Momani M, Turnbull S, Sathiaraj R, Keefe D, Hart NH. Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:565-589. [PMID: 37358040 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient navigation is a strategy for overcoming barriers to reduce disparities and to improve access and outcomes. The aim of this umbrella review was to identify, critically appraise, synthesize, and present the best available evidence to inform policy and planning regarding patient navigation across the cancer continuum. Systematic reviews examining navigation in cancer care were identified in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Epistemonikos, and Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) databases and in the gray literature from January 1, 2012, to April 19, 2022. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two authors. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Review and Research Syntheses was used for quality appraisal. Emerging literature up to May 25, 2022, was also explored to capture primary research published beyond the coverage of included systematic reviews. Of the 2062 unique records identified, 61 systematic reviews were included. Fifty-four reviews were quantitative or mixed-methods reviews, reporting on the effectiveness of cancer patient navigation, including 12 reviews reporting costs or cost-effectiveness outcomes. Seven qualitative reviews explored navigation needs, barriers, and experiences. In addition, 53 primary studies published since 2021 were included. Patient navigation is effective in improving participation in cancer screening and reducing the time from screening to diagnosis and from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Emerging evidence suggests that patient navigation improves quality of life and patient satisfaction with care in the survivorship phase and reduces hospital readmission in the active treatment and survivorship care phases. Palliative care data were extremely limited. Economic evaluations from the United States suggest the potential cost-effectiveness of navigation in screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vivienne E Milch
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona Crawford-Williams
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ria Joseph
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jolyn Johal
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Narayanee Dick
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew P Wallen
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anupriya Agarwal
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Tieu
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Dorothy Keefe
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicolas H Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Human Performance Research Centre, Innovative Solutions for Well-being and Health (INSIGHT) Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fasolino T, Koci A, Huggins J, Lindell K. A Rapid Review of Uses and Outcomes of Telehealth Care in Rural and Remote Regions in the United States. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2023; 25:239-248. [PMID: 37525370 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
As telehealth expands and becomes an increasingly important provision of palliative care and hospice services, the understanding of the uses and outcomes of this care delivery platform in rural communities is warranted. This rapid review aims to highlight the practice, policy, and research implications of telehealth in rural regions. Using a systematic approach for accessing and synthesizing available publications, this review included 22 articles published between January 2020 and January 2023. Telehealth was used with adult and pediatric populations diagnosed with serious illnesses. Acceptance of this type of care delivery was noted in adults and children, but not all found telehealth a valuable mechanism for care. Telehealth services included but were not limited to direct communication between the provider and the patient/caregiver, medication management, and a peer-to-peer consultant role for rural palliative care and hospice teams. Of those studies addressing provider-centered outcomes, noise level, interruptions, missed appointments, and challenges with providing emotional support were reported. Organizational barriers, such as the lack of financial support, were noted for pediatric hospices. Individuals living in rural communities require more frequent, immediate, and specialized attention over their illness trajectory. Practice, policy, and research implications are identified to consider the next steps for telehealth delivery of palliative care.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gray TF, Henderson MD, Barakat LP, Knafl KA, Deatrick JA. Advancing family science and health equity through the 2022-2026 National Institute of Nursing Research strategic plan. Nurs Outlook 2023; 71:102030. [PMID: 37696135 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.102030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consistent with the National Institute of Nursing Research's mission of leading nursing research to address current health challenges, the new Strategic Plan identifies five research lenses: health equity, social determinants of health, population and community health, prevention and health promotion, and systems and models of care. Family research, central to nursing research and practice, is the cornerstone of social ecology and represents a critical intersection of social and structural determinants of health. PURPOSE We argue why family health is essential to the 2022-2026 Strategic Plan and how the lenses can strengthen family research. METHODS Drawing from collective expertise and existing literature in family research, sociology, psychology, and nursing science, the authors present a new conceptual model that integrates structural racism and heteropatriarchy to examine the salience of family structure statuses for family outcomes and discuss approaches to research design, empirical measurement, and interpretation in order to bring this new model into practice. DISCUSSION The NINR Strategic Plan has the potential to dismantle structures that perpetuate racism and health inequity within and across family structures. An underaddressed research area under the new Strategic Plan relates to how social determinants of health influence and are influenced by families. CONCLUSION We challenge all investigators, not just family scientists, to expand the scope of their research to conceptualize the role of family on health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamryn F Gray
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Cancer Outcomes Research and Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Marcus D Henderson
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD; Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lamia P Barakat
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kathleen A Knafl
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Janet A Deatrick
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tan KR, Waters AR, Chen Q, Hendricks BA, Coombs LA, Kent EE. Inequities Among Cancer Caregivers with Diverse Identities: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:803-812. [PMID: 37043117 PMCID: PMC10091341 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The number of older adults with cancer relying on support from caregivers continues to increase. Health disparities in older adults with cancer often extend to their caregivers. This review aims to assess the state of cancer caregiving research in historically underrepresented diverse populations and provide recommendations for future research and policy. RECENT FINDINGS Research on caregivers of older adults with cancer from diverse backgrounds has primarily been descriptive. Health disparities for historically underrepresented caregivers (LGBTQ + , BIPOC, rural, young adults, youth) exist across several dimensions (e.g., financial, mental, and physical health, and access to caregiver support). Few published studies have closely examined the unique experiences of these caregivers nor provided culturally appropriate tailored interventions. Health equity research within caregiving populations is in its infancy. Priorities for future work should focus on identifying modifiable targets for intervention, changing systems-level processes in acknowledging and supporting caregivers, and creating policies that reduce financial inequities of caregiving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly R Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 East Weaver Street, CB 7293, 2nd Floor, Suite 220, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Austin R Waters
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Qi Chen
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Bailey A Hendricks
- College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Lorinda A Coombs
- School of Nursing, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin E Kent
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liddicoat Yamarik R, Chiu LA, Flannery M, Van Allen K, Adeyemi O, Cuthel AM, Brody AA, Goldfeld KS, Schrag D, Grudzen CR. Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082310. [PMID: 37190238 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Persons living with advanced cancer have intensive symptoms and psychosocial needs that often result in visits to the Emergency Department (ED). We report on program engagement, advance care planning (ACP), and hospice use for a 6-month longitudinal nurse-led, telephonic palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer as part of a larger randomized trial. Patients 50 years and older with metastatic solid tumors were recruited from 18 EDs and randomized to receive nursing calls focused on ACP, symptom management, and care coordination or specialty outpatient palliative care (ClinicialTrials.gov: NCT03325985). One hundred and five (50%) graduated from the 6-month program, 54 (26%) died or enrolled in hospice, 40 (19%) were lost to follow-up, and 19 (9%) withdrew prior to program completion. In a Cox proportional hazard regression, withdrawn subjects were more likely to be white and have a low symptom burden compared to those who did not withdraw. Two hundred eighteen persons living with advanced cancer were enrolled in the nursing arm, and 182 of those (83%) completed some ACP. Of the subjects who died, 43/54 (80%) enrolled in hospice. Our program demonstrated high rates of engagement, ACP, and hospice enrollment. Enrolling subjects with a high symptom burden may result in even greater program engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laraine Ann Chiu
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Mara Flannery
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Van Allen
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Oluwaseun Adeyemi
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Allison M Cuthel
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Abraham A Brody
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Keith S Goldfeld
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Agustina R, Ispriantari A, Konlan KD, Lin MF. Impact of early palliative care on the quality of life in caregivers of cancer patients: A systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2023. [PMID: 36637053 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining caregivers' quality of life (QoL) is critical to sustaining the care needed for cancer patients. One of the interventions applied to cancer patients' caregivers is early palliative care (EPC). AIMS This systematic review synthesized the implementation of EPC on the QoL of caregivers of cancer patients. METHODS The search was undertaken using seven electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses (PQDT). The search strategy integrated relevant terms of early palliative care, caregivers, cancer, and quality of life and was conducted until March 14, 2022. The thematic data analysis approach was used to integrate the results. RESULTS Using advanced search features, 4193 studies were obtained on the initial search. After screening and quality assessment, eight studies were included. Eight studies depicted that EPC interventions were delivered for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer, that is, those with a life expectancy of at least 4-24 months or considered intermediate to poor prognosis. One study provided the intervention for caregivers of patients newly diagnosed with cancer. None of the studies had the same protocol or content in delivering EPC for caregivers. Four studies gave similar details on addressing the strategies for caregivers in several aspects, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. There was no difference in the QoL between caregivers with cancer patients who received EPC compared with usual care. EPC was noted to influence other factors, such as caregivers' psychological distress and burden. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION The data on EPC interventions portray no beneficial effects on the QoL of caregivers with cancer patients. Further studies on developing standard protocols of EPC, multidisciplinary team, and how early it should be given to caregivers are strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rismia Agustina
- Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarbaru, Indonesia
| | - Aloysia Ispriantari
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Nursing, Institute of Technology and Health Science RS dr Soepraoen, Malang, Indonesia
| | - Kennedy Diema Konlan
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Mei-Feng Lin
- Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bender JL, Flora PK, Soheilipour S, Dirlea M, Maharaj N, Parvin L, Matthew A, Catton C, Jamnicky L, Pollock P, Kwan W, Finelli A, Kazanjian A. Web-Based Peer Navigation for Men with Prostate Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4285-4299. [PMID: 35735452 PMCID: PMC9221974 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability and potential effects of True North Peer Navigation (PN)—a web-based peer navigation program for men with prostate cancer (PC) and their family caregivers. A one-arm, pre-post pilot feasibility study was conducted at two cancer centres in Canada. Participants were matched through a web-app with a specially trained peer navigator who assessed needs and barriers to care, provided support and encouraged a proactive approach to health for 3 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated, along with paired t-tests. True North PN was feasible, with 57.9% (84/145) recruitment, 84.5% (71/84) pre-questionnaire, 77.5% (55/71) app registration, 92.7% (51/55) match and 66.7% (34/51) post-questionnaire completion rates. Mean satisfaction with Peer Navigators was 8.4/10 (SD 2.15), mean program satisfaction was 6.8/10 (SD 2.9) and mean app usability was 60/100 (SD 14.8). At 3 months, mean ± SE patient/caregiver activation had improved by 11.5 ± 3.4 points (p = 0.002), patient quality of life by 1.1 ± 0.2 points (p < 0.0001), informational support by 0.4 ± 0.17 points (p = 0.03), practical support by 0.5 ± 0.25 points (p = 0.04) and less need for support related to fear of recurrence among patients by 0.4 ± 19 points (p = 0.03). The True North web-based peer navigation program is highly feasible and acceptable among PC patients and caregivers, and the associated improvements in patient and caregiver activation are promising. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to determine effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline L. Bender
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (P.K.F.); (M.D.)
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-416-581-8606
| | - Parminder K. Flora
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (P.K.F.); (M.D.)
| | - Shimae Soheilipour
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
- Department of Oral Public Health, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| | - Mihaela Dirlea
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; (P.K.F.); (M.D.)
| | - Nandini Maharaj
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Lisa Parvin
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (A.M.); (L.J.); (A.F.)
| | - Charles Catton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | - Leah Jamnicky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (A.M.); (L.J.); (A.F.)
| | - Philip Pollock
- Clinical Trials and Clinical Research, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada;
| | - Winkle Kwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Fraser Valley, BC V3V 1Z2, Canada;
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (A.M.); (L.J.); (A.F.)
| | - Arminée Kazanjian
- Division of Health Services and Policy, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (S.S.); (N.M.); (L.P.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bechthold AC, Azuero A, Pisu M, Pierce JY, Williams GR, Taylor RA, Wells R, Curry K, Reed RD, Harrell ER, Gazaway S, Mollman S, Engler S, Puga F, Bakitas MA, Dionne-Odom JN. The Project ENABLE Cornerstone randomized controlled trial: study protocol for a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for African American and rural-dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers. Trials 2022; 23:452. [PMID: 35655285 PMCID: PMC9161197 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06305-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Family caregivers play a vital, yet stressful role in managing the healthcare needs and optimizing the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, from the time they are newly diagnosed until end of life. While early telehealth palliative care has been found to effectively support family caregivers, little work has focused on historically under-resourced populations, particularly African American and rural-dwelling individuals. To address this need, we developed and are currently testing Project ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) Cornerstone, a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for family caregivers of African American and rural-dwelling patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer. Methods This is a 2-site, single-blind, hybrid type I implementation-effectiveness trial of the Cornerstone intervention versus usual care. Cornerstone is a multicomponent intervention based on Pearlin’s Stress-Health Process Model where African American and/or rural-dwelling family caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer (target sample size = 294 dyads) are paired with a lay navigator coach and receive a series of six, brief 20–60-min telehealth sessions focused on stress management and coping, caregiving skills, getting help, self-care, and preparing for the future/advance care planning. Subsequent to core sessions, caregivers receive monthly follow-up indefinitely until the patient’s death. Caregiver and patient outcomes are collected at baseline and every 12 weeks until the patient’s death (primary outcome: caregiver distress at 24 weeks; secondary outcomes: caregiver: quality of life and burden; patient: distress, quality of life, and healthcare utilization). Implementation costs and the intervention cost effectiveness are also being evaluated. Discussion Should this intervention demonstrate efficacy, it would yield an implementation-ready model of early palliative care support for under-resourced family caregivers. A key design principle that has centrally informed the Cornerstone intervention is that every caregiving situation is unique and each caregiver faces distinct challenges that cannot be addressed using a one-size-fits all approach. Hence, Cornerstone employs culturally savvy lay navigator coaches who are trained to establish a strong, therapeutic alliance with participants and tailor their coaching to a diverse range of individual circumstances. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04318886. Registered on 20 March, 2020. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06305-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery C Bechthold
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andres Azuero
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria Pisu
- Division of Preventive Medicine, UAB School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Grant R Williams
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Richard A Taylor
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rachel Wells
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kayleigh Curry
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rhiannon D Reed
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Erin R Harrell
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| | - Shena Gazaway
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sarah Mollman
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD, USA
| | - Sally Engler
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Frank Puga
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Marie A Bakitas
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.,Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA. .,Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Improving outcomes demands patient-centred interventions and equitable delivery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:569-570. [PMID: 35650281 PMCID: PMC9157028 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00653-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|