Peripheral blasts are associated with responses to ruxolitinib and outcomes in patients with chronic-phase myelofibrosis

Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: The earlier, the better?

There is mounting evidence to support the use of ruxolitinib earlier in the disease course of myelofibrosis. Use in intermediate‐1 risk myelofibrosis is generally associated with higher efficacy and lower toxicity.

Prognostic and Predictive Models in Myelofibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myelofibrosis (MF) includes prefibrotic primary MF (pre-PMF), overt-PMF and secondary MF (SMF). Median overall survival (OS) of pre-PMF, overt-PMF and SMF patients is around 14 years, seven and nine years, respectively. Main causes of mortality are non-clonal progression and transformation into blast phase.

RECENT FINDINGS

Discoveries on the impact of the biological architecture on OS have led to the design of integrated scores to predict survival in PMF. For SMF, OS estimates should be calculated by the specific MYSEC-PM (MYelofibrosis SECondary-prognostic model). Information on the prognostic role of the molecular landscape in SMF is accumulating. Crucial treatment decisions for MF patients could be now supported by multivariable predictive algorithms. OS should become a relevant endpoint of clinical trials. Prognostic models guide prediction of OS and treatment planning in MF, therefore, their timely application is critical in the personalized approach of MF patients.

Combination of ligand‑based and structure‑based virtual screening for the discovery of novel Janus kinase 2 inhibitors against philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

The activating V617F mutation in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) has been shown to be the major cause for classic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Thus, the development of pharmacologic JAK2 inhibitors is an essential move in combating MPNs. In this study, screening methods examining both ligands and their structures were developed to discover novel JAK2 inhibitors from the ChemDiv database with virtual screening identifying 886 candidate inhibitors. Next, these compounds were further filtered using ADMET, drug likeliness, and PAINS filtering, which reduced the compound number even further. This consolidated list of candidate compounds (n = 49) was then evaluated biologically at molecular level and the highest performing inhibitor with a novel scaffold was selected for further examination. This candidate inhibitor, CD4, was then subjected to molecular dynamics studies, with complex stability, root-mean-square deviation, radius of gyration, binding free energy, and binding properties all examined. The result suggested that CD4 interacts with JAK2 and that the CD4-JAK2 complex is stable. This study was able to identify a candidate inhibitor that warrants further examination and optimization and may potentially serve as a future MPN treatment.

Moving Beyond Ruxolitinib Failure in Myelofibrosis: Evolving Strategies for Second Line Therapy

Ruxolitinib has been the cornerstone of pharmacologic therapy for myelofibrosis for over a decade. However, the last several years have witnessed the regulatory approval of other Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for myelofibrosis, i.e. fedratinib, pacritinib, and US approval of momelotinib is widely anticipated in 2023. Due to the multifaceted clinical presentation of myelofibrosis, a watertight definition of ruxolitinib failure has remained elusive, as "progression" on ruxolitinib can take many forms and management is highly nuanced. Yet, the availability of other JAK inhibitors and potential future availability of non-JAK inhibitor agents for myelofibrosis make a consensus on management of ruxolitinib failure critically important. This consensus paper summarizes a discussion between multiple academic and community physician experts, a pharmacist and an advanced practice provider around the issues to be considered for the optimal care of patients with myelofibrosis whose disease is refractory to or does not respond adequately to ruxolitinib, or who exhibit intolerance to ruxolitinib. The panel identified several areas of consensus, as well as some areas where more data to inform evidence-based practice are needed. In some situations, maintaining ruxolitinib while adding another agent, e.g. to address anemia, is appropriate, whereas in others, switching to a different drug has merit.

Targeted Therapy for MPNs: Going Beyond JAK Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

JAK inhibition is an effective means of controlling symptom burden and improving splenomegaly in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, a majority of patients treated with JAK inhibition will have disease progression with long-term use. In In this review, we focus on the investigation of novel targeted agents beyond JAK inhibitors both in the chronic phase of disease and in the accelerated/blast phase of disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Relevant targeted therapies in MPNs include BET inhibitors, BCL inhibitors, LSD1 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, IDH inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, and MDM2 inhibitor. Agents within these classes have been investigated either as monotherapy or in combination with a JAK inhibitor. We summarize the prospective data for these agents along with detailing the ongoing phase III trials incorporating these agents. While JAK inhibition has been a mainstay of therapy in MPNs, a majority of patients will have disease of progression. JAK inhibitors also have limited anti-clonal effect and do not impact the rate of progression to the blast phase of disease. The novel therapies detailed in this review not only show promise in ameliorating the symptom burden of MPNs but may be able to alter the natural history of disease.

Combination of ruxolitinib with ABT-737 exhibits synergistic effects in cells carrying concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations

The V617F mutation in Janus kinase 2 is considered one of the driver mutations leading to Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations accelerate the progression of myelofibrosis in patients with MPNs. Few therapies are currently available for patients with these two mutations. In our study, the combination of ruxolitinib with ABT-737 was evaluated in cells carrying JAK2V617F and ASXL1 double mutations. RNA sequencing indicated overactivated oxidative phosphorylation in JAK2V617F;Asxl1+/- cKit+ cells. The cell line model with JAK2V617F and ASXL1 double mutations (HEL-AKO cells) also exhibited dysregulated mitochondrial function with an increase in the reactive oxygen species levels and a decrease in the ATP levels. The colony growth inhibition rates of cells with JAK2V617F and ASXL1 double mutations were significantly lower than those of cells with only the JAK2V617F mutation. Combined treatment with ruxolitinib and ABT-737 promoted apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation of HEL-AKO cells. Cotreatment with the two drugs also inhibited the growth of bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from patients with concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations. In conclusion, we provide preclinical evidence showing that the combination of ruxolitinib and ABT-737 is a promising therapeutic strategy for MPN patients with concurrent JAK2V617F and ASXL1 mutations.

Fedratinib: a pharmacotherapeutic option for JAK-inhibitor naïve and exposed patients with myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Ruxolitinib is the most commonly used JAK-inhibitor (JAKi) for the management of symptoms related to splenomegaly and cytokine-mediated inflammation in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), but is limited by variable durability of response with most patients experiencing failure after 2-3 years. Long-term data on other approved JAKi, fedratinib and pacritinib, are not available due to the clinical hold put on pivotal trials for toxicity concerns.

AREAS COVERED

Following the initial hold for concern of Wernicke's encephalopathy, fedratinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for MF. We review the data available from early, and late phase critical trials, outline a role for fedratinib in the current treatment landscape of MF, and highlight the knowledge gaps in optimizing use of fedratinib.

EXPERT OPINION

The JAKARTA and JAKARTA2 trials established efficacy in spleen volume response (SVR) and symptom reduction in JAKi-naïve and ruxolitinib-exposed MF patients, respectively. Further trials, FREEDOM and FREEDOM2, are in progress to understand long-term effects of fedratinib; and include strategies to mitigate gastrointestinal toxicity, monitor thiamine levels and surveil for encephalopathy. We use fedratinib for symptomatic MF following ruxolitinib failure in patients without significant cytopenias; with practical strategies for monitoring and managing potential toxicity.

Towards a Personalized Definition of Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Purpose of Review

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), prefibrotic (pre-), and overt-primary myelofibrosis (primary MF, PMF). PV and ET could evolve into secondary MF (SMF), whose early diagnosis relies on monitoring signs of possible progression. All MPNs have a risk of blast phase (BP), that is associated with a very dismal outcome. Overall survival (OS) is different among MPNs, and disease-specific prognostic scores should be applied for a correct clinical management. In this review, an overview of current prognostic scores in MPNs will be provided.

Recent Findings

The biological complexity of MPNs and its role on the trajectory of disease outcome have led to the design of integrated prognostic models that are nowadays of common use in PMF patients. As for PV and ET, splicing gene mutations could have a detrimental role, but with the limit of the not routinary recommended application of extensive molecular analysis in these diseases. SMF is recognized as a distinct entity compared to PMF, and OS estimates should be calculated by the MYSEC-PM (Myelofibrosis SECondary-prognostic model). Both in PMF and SMF, decisions as selection of patients potentially candidates to allogenic stem cell transplant or that could benefit from an early shift from standard treatment are based not only on conventional prognostic scores, but also on multivariable algorithms.

Summary

The expanding landscape of risk prediction for OS, evolution to BP, and SMF progression from PV/ET informs personalized approach to the management of patients affected by MPNs.