Which are more correctly diagnosed: conventional Papanicolaou smears or Thinprep samples? A comparative study of 9 years of external quality-assurance testing

Clinical values of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer by EBUS-TBNA

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

EBUS-TBNA has emerged as an important minimally invasive procedure for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of different specimen preparation from aspirates on the diagnosis of lung cancer.

METHODS

181 consecutive patients with known or suspected lung cancer accompanied by hilar / mediastinal lymphadenopathy underwent EBUS-TBNA from January 2019 to December 2022. Specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA were processed by three methods: Traditional smear cytology of aspirates (TSC), liquid-based cytology of aspirates (LBC) and histopathology of core biopsies.

RESULTS

EBUS-TBNA was performed in 181 patients on 213 lymph nodes, the total positive rate of the combination of three specimen preparation methods was 80.7%. The diagnostic positive rate of histopathology was 72.3%, TSC was 68.1%, and LBC was 65.3%, no significant differences was observed (p = 0.29); however, statistically significant difference was noted between the combination of three preparation methods and any single specimen preparation methods (p = 0.002). The diagnostic sensitivity of histopathology combined with TSC and histopathology combined with LBC were 96.5 and 94.8%, the specificity was 95.0% and 97.5%, the PPV was 98.8% and 99.4%, the NPV was 86.4% and 81.2%, the diagnostic accuracy was 96.2% and 95.3%, respectively; The sensitivity and accuracy of above methods were higher than that of single specimen preparation, but lower than that of combination of three preparation methods.

CONCLUSION

When EBUS-TBNA is used for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, histopathology combined with TSC can achieve enough diagnostic efficiency and better cost-effectiveness.

Diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology test in intrathoracic lymph nodes and lung lesions sampled by endobronchial ultrasonography-transbronchial needle aspiration

BACKGROUNDS

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has begun to be used in non-gynecological samples such as endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of LBC in intrathoracic lymph nodes and lung lesions sampled with EBUS-TBNA.

METHODS

In total, 174 cases that underwent EBUS-TBNA between July 2020 and February 2021 were included (75 and 99 cases were prepared using conventional and LBC methods, respectively). The two groups were compared in terms of diagnostic categories, number of slides, cell blocks, slides per location, locations sampled, immunohistochemical studies, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The percentages of malignant, suspicious for malignancy, benign, and non-diagnostic (ND) cases were 51.8%, 1.1%, 39.6%, and 7.5%, respectively. The LBC and conventional group (CG) had similar rates in the diagnostic categories, except for ND (3.0% and 13.3%, respectively). The sensitivity of LBC and CG were 90.4% and 85.7%, respectively. There were no differences in the specificity and diagnostic accuracy between groups. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of the number of slides, number of slides per location, number of cell blocks, and locations sampled (p < .001, p < .001, p < .05, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The LBC technique can be used for samples taken with EBUS-TBNA. Rapid fixation and the absence of artificial problems greatly reduce the rate of ND samples in LBC slides. Other important advantages are a lower number of slides to examine and a greater number of cell blocks.

The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration liquid-based cytology in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive, reliable technique for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs). Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is widely used for cervical cancer screening because it provides reliable and feasible results. The present study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the combination of EBUS-TBNA and LBC in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

METHODS

A total of 602 LNs that were retrospectively analyzed were sampled in 442 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between January 2014 and December 2016. The histopathological result of TBNA tissue or cell blocks was considered as the gold standard to evaluate diagnostic utility of LBC and conventional smears (CS) for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

RESULTS

Of the 602 LNs, 265 were mediastinal LN metastases from lung cancer, four were lymphoma, and 333 were benign. The sensitivity of LBC and CS in the diagnosis of mediastinal LN metastases from lung cancer was 72.8% and 63%, respectively, and the specificity was 98.5% and 97%, respectively. The positive predictive values for LBC and CS were 97.5% and 94.4%, respectively, whereas the negative predictive values were 82.2% and 76.9%, respectively. The accuracy of LBC and CS was 88% and 83.7%, respectively. The diagnostic value of LBC was significantly higher than that of CS (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of EBUS-TBNA and LBC is a highly reliable and feasible procedure that optimizes diagnostic utility for the diagnosis of lung cancer and mediastinal LN staging.

Histopathological Patterns and Characteristics of Abnormal Cervical Smear in Madinah Region of Saudi Arabia

Cervical cancer is a major public health problem that continues to be one of the leading female genital cancers worldwide. In the kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), cervical cancer ranks the fifteenth most frequent cancer among females. This study is the first published research study addressing the screening of cervical cancer in Madinah region of KSA.

Candidate biomarkers in the cervical vaginal fluid for the (self-)diagnosis of cervical precancer

Purpose

Despite improvement in vaccines against human papilloma virus (HPV), the causative agent of cervical cancer, screening women for cervical precancer will remain indispensable in the coming 30–40 years. A simple test that could be performed at home or at a doctor’s practice and that informs the woman whether she is at risk would significantly help make a broader group of patients who aware that they need medical treatment. Cervical vaginal fluid (CVF) is a body fluid that is very well suited for such a test.

Methods

Narrative review of cervical (pre)cancer candidate biomarkers from cervicovaginal fluid, is based on a detailed review of the literature. We will also discuss the possibilities that these biomarkers create for the development of a self-test or point-of-care test for cervical (pre)cancer.

Results

Several DNA, DNA methylation, miRNA, and protein biomarkers were identified in the cervical vaginal fluid; however, not all of these biomarkers are suited for development of a simple diagnostic assay.

Conclusions

Proteins, especially alpha-actinin-4, are most suited for development of a simple assay for cervical (pre)cancer. Accuracy of the test could further be improved by combination of several proteins or by combination with a new type of biomarker, e.g., originating from the cervicovaginal microbiome or metabolome.

Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the current conventional Pap smear with liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparations.

STUDY DESIGN

Women routinely undergoing their cytopathological and histopathological examinations at Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo (FOSP) were recruited for LBC. Conventional smears were analyzed from women from other areas of the State of São Paulo with similar sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 218,594 cases were analyzed, consisting of 206,999 conventional smears and 11,595 LBC. Among the conventional smears, 3.0% were of unsatisfactory preparation; conversely, unsatisfactory LBC preparations accounted for 0.3%. The ASC-H (atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) frequency did not demonstrate any differences between the two methods. In contrast, the incidence of ASC-US (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) was almost twice as frequent between LBC and conventional smears, at 2.9 versus 1.6%, respectively. An equal percentage of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were observed for the two methods, but not for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, which were more significantly observed in LBC preparations than in conventional smears (2.2 vs. 0.7%). The index of positivity was importantly enhanced from 3.0% (conventional smears) to 5.7% (LBC).

CONCLUSIONS

LBC performed better than conventional smears, and we are truly confident that LBC can improve public health strategies aimed at reducing cervical lesions through prevention programs.