Determination of PD-L1 expression in effusions from mesothelioma by immuno-cytochemical staining

Malignant pleural effusion cell blocks are reliable resources for PD-L1 analysis in advanced lung adenocarcinomas: a concordance study with matched histologic samples

INTRODUCTION

In lung cancer patients presenting with malignant pleural effusion (MPE), cytology might represent the only source of tumor tissue for diagnosis and predictive biomarker testing. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor cells is a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung carcinomas and is tested using immunohistochemistry. However, knowledge of the validity of PD-L1 testing on MPE samples is limited. We evaluated the feasibility of immunocytochemistry (ICC) for PD-L1 in MPE cell blocks (CBs) and assessed the concordance in expression with patient-matched histologic samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ICC for PD-L1 was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded CBs of MPE and patient-matched histologic samples, if available, using the automated Ventana PD-L1 SP263 assay. The tumor proportion score (TPS), based on partial or complete membranous tumor cell staining, was categorized as negative (<1%), low (≥1% to <50%), and high (≥50%). In CBs with any degree of PD-L1 expression, ICC for CD163 highlighting macrophages was performed to exclude nonspecific PD-L1 expression in macrophages. The CB PD-L1 TPS was compared with the TPS obtained from the patient-matched histologic samples.

RESULTS

Of 43 MPE CBs available, 25 were positive for PD-L1 (25 of 42; 59%), and 1 sample was inadequate. Of the 11 patient-matched histologic samples tested, the PD-L1 TPS categories were concordant for 10 of the 11 (91% concordance) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression in MPE CBs showed good concordance with expression in histologic samples and is feasible as a source for PD-L1 testing. The concurrent use of CD163 immunostains will aid in the manual assessment of PD-L1 TPS.

Higher concordance of PD-L1 expression between biopsies and effusions in epithelioid than in nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a therapy-resistant tumor, often causing an effusion. Drugs targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have shown promising results, but assessment of PD-L1 expression to select patients for therapy has mainly been performed on histologic tissue samples. In a previous study, we showed that MM effusions are suitable for PD-L1 assessment with results comparable to those reported in histologic studies, but no studies have compared PD-L1 expression in histologic and cytologic samples.

METHODS

PD-L1 expression was determined immunohistochemically (clone 28-8) in 61 paired samples of effusions and biopsies from patients with pleural MM, obtained at the time of diagnosis. Only cases with >100 tumor cells were included. Membranous staining in tumor cells was considered positive at ≥1%, >5%, >10%, and >50% cutoff levels.

RESULTS

Of 61 histologic samples, PD-L1 expression was found in 28 and 7 samples at ≥1% and >50% cutoffs, respectively; the corresponding figures for cytology were 21 and 5, respectively. The overall percentage agreement between histology and cytology was 69% and 84%, with a kappa (κ) of 0.36 and 0.08 at ≥1% and >50% cutoffs, respectively. The concordance between cytology and histology tended to be higher for epithelioid MM versus nonepithelioid MM at a ≥1% cutoff. PD-L1 positivity in biopsies, but not in effusions, correlated with the histologic subtype at a ≥1% cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

A moderate concordance of PD-L1 expression between biopsies and effusions from pleural MM, especially for the epithelioid subtype, indicates biological differences between the 2 types of specimens. Cytology and histology may be complementary.

Prognostic Role of Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1 in Resectable Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is incompletely understood. Our objectives were to evaluate the evidence for tumor PD-L1 as a prognostic biomarker in MPM through meta-analysis and to determine whether tumor PD-L1 expression is associated with survival in MPM patients undergoing macroscopic complete resection.

METHODS

Meta-analysis was performed to determine the association of PD-L1 with overall survival in MPM (n = 1655) from 14 studies containing overall survival and tumor PD-L1 expression. Univariable and multivariable analyses tested the relationship of tumor PD-L1 with overall survival and recurrence-free survival in an institutional cohort of MPM patients treated by macroscopic complete resection (n = 75). To validate the association of PD-L1 with overall survival, we utilized two independent MPM cohorts (n = 284).

RESULTS

Meta-analysis demonstrated that high tumor PD-L1 expression was associated with poor overall survival. Among 75 patients undergoing macroscopic complete resection, 49 tumors (65%) expressed PD-L1 (1% or more), and high PD-L1 (50% or greater) was more commonly expressed on nonepithelial (29%) compared with epithelial tumors (14%). High tumor PD-L1 expression was independently associated with poor overall survival (P < .001, hazard ratio 5.67) and recurrence-free survival (P = .003, hazard ratio 3.28). The association of PD-L1 overexpression with unfavorable survival was more significant in epithelial MPMs than nonepithelial MPMs. These findings were validated in RNA sequencing analyses in two independent cohorts. Exploratory transcriptome analysis revealed that MPM tumors with PD-L1 overexpression displayed coexpression of other immune regulatory molecules, programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 and T-cell immunoglobulin mucin receptor 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor PD-L1 expression is a prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing surgical resection for MPM and may be useful in perioperative decision making.

PD-L1 lineage-specific quantification in malignant pleural effusions of lung adenocarcinoma by flow cytometry

OBJECTIVES

Pathologists encounter several challenges with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests in malignant effusions, including lineage specification (distinction between carcinoma vs. immune and mesothelial cells), background staining, sample fixation issues and inter-observer variability. We explored flow cytometric (FC) quantification of PD-L1 expression in malignant pleural effusions of lung adenocarcinoma patients as an alternative, automated, and objective quantification method compared to PD-L1 IHC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 23 malignant pleural effusions of TTF-1-positive adenocarcinoma were subjected to FC with a panel of antibodies against CD45, CD3, CD200, EpCAM, D2-40 (podoplanin), and PD-L1 (clone MIH1). The PD-L1 gate was established using fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) isotype controls. Lineage-specific PD-L1 surface expression was quantified and the FC tumor proportion score (TPS) was assessed. PD-L1 IHC was performed on cell block sections using Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay and assessed by two cytopathologists blinded to the FC PD-L1 TPS.

RESULTS

FC analysis allowed for the distinction between carcinoma cells (CD45^-/EpCAM⁺/D2-40-), leukocytes (CD45⁺/EpCAM-/D2-40-) and mesothelial cells (CD45-/EpCAM-/D2-40⁺). FC PD-L1 TPS ranged from 0% to 77 %, while the 22C3 IHC PD-L1 TPS ranged from 0% to 97 %. The FC and IHC TPS values correlated positively (R = 0.8). Best concordance was observed when FC was performed and cell blocks were generated in parallel (R = 0.99). FC also allowed for simultaneous PD-L1 quantification in mesothelial and T-cells. PD-L1 expression on mesothelial cells ranged from 0% to 90.9 %, which also correlated positively with IHC TPS (R = 0.54). PD-L1 expression on T-cells was limited (0.1-2.9 %).

CONCLUSION

FC permits rapid, objective and lineage-specific PD-L1 surface expression quantification with limited specimen manipulation. The FC and IHC concordance was impacted by different antibody clones being used, but the positive correlation suggests potential clinical utility, especially in malignant effusion specimens.

Cytology cell blocks from malignant pleural effusion are good candidates for PD-L1 detection in advanced NSCLC compared with matched histology samples

BACKGROUND

Detection of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been commonly used to predict the efficacy of treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, there is limited literature regarding the reliability of PD-L1 testing using malignant pleural effusion (MPE) cell blocks. Here, we assess PD-L1 expression in sections from MPE cell blocks and evaluate the value of IHC double staining in the interpretation of PD-L1 expression.

METHODS

In all, 124 paired formalin-fixed tissues from advanced NSCLC patients, including MPE cell blocks and matched histology samples, were included. PD-L1 expression was assessed using the SP263 assay, and the tumor proportion score (TPS) and the staining intensity were evaluated. PD-L1 staining results were also compared between IHC double and single staining techniques.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was concordant in most paired cases (86/101, 85.1%) among three TPS cut-offs (<1%, 1-49% and ≥ 50%), with a kappa value of 0.774. Moreover, a significant difference in PD-L1 expression between MPE cell blocks and biopsy samples was observed (p = 0.005). For the 15 discordant pairs, 13 MPE cell block samples showed increased expression of PD-L1. Compared with the standard IHC single PD-L1 assay, double staining with anti-TTF-1 and anti-PD-L1 revealed a negative effect on PD-L1 expression testing and resulted in weaker staining intensity and a lower TPS (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

MPE cell block samples are good candidates for PD-L1 expression detection in advanced NSCLC patients. The mechanism and clinical significance of the higher PD-L1 expression rate in MPE cell blocks compared with small biopsy samples remain to be evaluated prospectively.

PD-L1 expression in pleural effusions of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and survival prediction: a controlled study by pleural biopsy

PD-L1 expression in pleural effusions (PE) of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) was compared with pleural biopsies and the positive expression in PE was correlated with survival time. The matched slices from same patient’s pleura and PE were collected which both were pathologically verified positive. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect PD-L1 expression. A total of 51 eligible cases were enrolled, including 30 males and 21 females. The average age was (67.06 ± 12.10) years. PD-L1 expression wasn’t statistically significant in pleura and cell masses (P > 0.05) and the correlation was statistically significant (r = 0.585, P = 0.000). Using an IHC scores of 5 point as a cutoff, positive PD-L1 expression in the pleura was 11.63% and that in the cell masses was 23.26%, and difference was significant (P < 0.05). The correlation coefficient was 0.605. Among 35 cases underwent systemic anti-tumor treatment, the mean survival time with positive PD-L1 expression in PE was 17.370 ± 1.827 months, which was significantly shorter than that with the negative (29.944 ± 2.671 months) (χ² = 4.507, P = 0.034). Positive PD-L1 expression in PE is higher than in the pleura and their correlation is well. It may predict the short survival time after systemic anti-tumor treatment.

Progress in the Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in 2017

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon, almost universally fatal, asbestos-induced malignancy. New and effective strategies for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment are urgently needed. Herein we review the advances in MPM achieved in 2017. Whereas recent epidemiological data demonstrated that the incidence of MPM-related death continued to increase in United States between 2009 and 2015, new insight into the molecular pathogenesis and the immunological tumor microenvironment of MPM, for example, regarding the role of BRCA1 associated protein 1 and the expression programmed death receptor ligand 1, are highlighting new potential therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, there continues to be an ever-expanding number of clinical studies investigating systemic therapies for MPM. These trials are primarily focused on immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with other immunotherapies and nonimmunotherapies. In addition, other promising targeted therapies, including pegylated adenosine deiminase (ADI-PEG20), which focuses on argininosuccinate synthase 1-deficient tumors, and tazemetostat, an enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit inhibitor of BRCA1 associated protein 1 gene (BAP1)-deficient tumors, are currently being explored.