Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

Accuracy of Subclassification and Grading of Renal Tumors on Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Alone

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of renal masses can distinguish between benign and malignant neoplasms in 73-94% of cases. Previous studies suggested the correct subclassification of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) by cytomorphology can be achieved in up to 80% of cases. However, as RCCs become increasingly subclassified by molecular signatures, correct subclassification based on cytology alone is increasingly difficult.

DESIGN

Two FNA passes (2 stained with Diff-Quik® and 2 with the Papanicolaou method) were performed on all fresh nephrectomy specimens for a 1-year period. There were 30 cases in this study, with 29 primary renal tumors and 1 case of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Each case was assigned a random number and came with 2 slides (1 from each staining method). Eight cytopathologists were asked to provide a diagnosis and the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grading if applicable. Fleiss' Kappa and Cohen's Kappa equations were used to look at inter-rater variability.

RESULTS

When compared to the surgical pathology diagnosis, the average percent correct diagnosis for all cytopathologist was 35%. Chromophobe RCCs had the best average percent accuracy at 72% followed by clearcell RCC at 48%. Average accuracy for grading RCCs was 40%. Inter-rater variability among the cytopathologists for all RCC diagnoses was fair with a Fleiss' Kappa coefficient of 0.28. For the WHO/ISUP grade, the weighted coefficient for each pathologist ranged from 0.11 to 0.45, ranging from fair to moderate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal tumors are difficult to classify on cytopathology alone. Core needle biopsy and ancillary studies are necessary if diagnosis will change management.

Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Somatic Mutations Associated With Mortality in Metastatic Clear Cell Kidney Carcinoma

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is among the most aggressive histologic subtypes of kidney cancer, representing about 3% of all human cancers. Patients at stage IV have nearly 60% of mortality in 2–3 years after diagnosis. To date, most ccRCC studies have used DNA microarrays and targeted sequencing of a small set of well-established, commonly altered genes. An exception is the large multi-omics study of The Cancer Genome Atlas Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-KIRC), which identified new ccRCC genes based on whole exome-sequencing (WES) data, and molecular prognostic signatures based on transcriptomics, epigenetics and proteomics data. Applying WES to simultaneously interrogate virtually all exons in the human genome for somatic variation, here we analyzed the burden of coding somatic mutations in metastatic ccRCC primary tumors, and its association with patient mortality from cancer, in patients who received VEGF receptor-targeting drugs as the first-line therapy. To this end, we sequenced the exomes of ten tumor–normal pairs of ccRCC patient tissues from primary biopsies at >100× mean depth and called somatic coding variation. Mutation burden analysis prioritized 138 genes linked to patient mortality. A gene set enrichment analysis evidenced strong statistical support for the abundance of genes involved in the development of kidney cancer (p = 2.31 × 10⁻⁹) and carcinoma (p = 1.22 × 10⁻⁵), with 49 genes having direct links with kidney cancer according to the published records. Two of these genes, SIPA1L2 and EIF3A, demonstrated independent associations with mortality in TCGA-KIRC project data. Besides, three mutational signatures were found to be operative in the tumor exomes, one of which (COSMIC signature 12) has not been previously reported in ccRCC. Selection analysis yielded no detectable evidence of overall positive or negative selection, with the exome-wide number of nonsynonymous substitutions per synonymous site reflecting largely neutral tumor evolution. Despite the limited sample size, our results provide evidence for candidate genes where somatic mutation burden is tentatively associated with patient mortality in metastatic ccRCC, offering new potential pharmacological targets and a basis for further validation studies.

New entities, new technologies, new findings: A review of the cytologic features of recently established subtypes of renal cell carcinoma

Several new renal tumor types with distinctive pathologic, epidemiologic, and genetic signatures have recently been adopted in the fourth edition of the World Health Organization classification. In succeeding years, the cytologic features of most of these new types have been described, adding to the trend of increasing diagnostic accuracy for most common renal cell carcinoma subtypes and the important diagnostic role of cytologic sampling in the management and personalization of therapy. The current article reviews the cytologic findings from these recently established renal cell carcinoma subtypes. Emphasis is placed on cytologic diagnostic clues, confirmatory ancillary testing, salient differential diagnoses, and challenges that can be encountered in an attempt to render accurate interpretations in small samples.