1
|
Solleiro Rodríguez J, Juanes Méndez JA, Blaya Haro F. Ergonomics appraisals in operating rooms. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2024; 79:100439. [PMID: 38996722 PMCID: PMC11301172 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This document presents the ergonomic assessments carried out by Spanish surgeons on the materials used within an operating room. With the objective of disseminating and raising awareness of the importance of ergonomics, this working group has compiled information from a previously conducted survey on musculoskeletal disorders associated with surgical work from the year 2022, obtaining feedback from 131 surgeons from 17 distinct specialties. A noteworthy 80.2 % of surveyed surgeons reported having experienced forced postures during surgery, and 96.9 % believe that their physical discomfort is a result of the posture adopted during operations. Such postures can result in the development of pathologies and may have a direct impact on work performance and even in extreme cases, it can lead to sick leave or early retirement. By providing their insights on electronic devices, surgical furniture, and instrumentation, surgeons can help identify areas for improvement in the practice of their profession.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Solleiro Rodríguez
- Doctoral Programme Education in the Knowledge Society, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
| | | | - Fernando Blaya Haro
- Analysis and Optical Characterization of Materials, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernández-Rodríguez D, Tarabichi S, Golankiewicz K, Zappley N, Parvizi J. Operating Room Air May Harbor Pathogens: The Role of an Ultraviolet Air Filtration Unit. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00544-8. [PMID: 38823518 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One important factor for the prevention of surgical site infections is ultraclean air in the operating room (OR). Still, the direct sterilization potential of most technologies, especially in a dynamic clinical setting, is not well understood. We aimed to determine and compare the microbial presence from the inlet and outlet flow of a filtration unit with crystalline ultraviolet-C (C-UVC) light. METHODS A prospective study was conducted at a single institution, where primary total joint arthroplasty and spine surgeries were performed. The OR was fitted with a positive ventilation system. In addition, a filtration unit with a C-UVC sterilizing light was placed in the OR. The inlet and outlet air flows were swabbed simultaneously and compared. Swabs were processed for culture and next-generation sequencing. RESULTS The mean length of the surgical procedures sampled was 68 ± 13 minutes. Overall, 19 out of 200 (9.5%) swabs isolated microorganisms. Inlet air swabs were positive at a higher rate (16 versus 3%; P < .01) compared to the outlet air swabs. A wide variety of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria were isolated, but fungi were only recovered from inlet air swabs. The detection of microorganisms was also higher when more door openings were performed (32.5 ± 7.1 versus 27.9 ± 5.6; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Air swabs mainly isolated microorganisms from the inlet flow to the filtration unit with a C-UVC light. The sterilizing unit counteracted factors affecting the air quality in the OR, namely door openings, surgical personnel, and tissue combustion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Fernández-Rodríguez
- Rothman Institute, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Plan de Estudios Combinados en Medicina (PECEM) MD/PhD, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Saad Tarabichi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Krystal Golankiewicz
- Rothman Institute, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicolina Zappley
- Rothman Institute, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Javad Parvizi
- International Joint Center, Acibadem University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Namisnak LH, Haghayegh S, Khoshnevis S, Diller KR. Bioheat Transfer Basis of Human Thermoregulation: Principles and Applications. JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER 2022; 144:031203. [PMID: 35833149 PMCID: PMC8823203 DOI: 10.1115/1.4053195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Thermoregulation is a process that is essential to the maintenance of life for all warm-blooded mammalian and avian species. It sustains a constant core body temperature in the face of a wide array of environmental thermal conditions and intensity of physical activities that generate internal heat. A primary component of thermoregulatory function is the movement of heat between the body core and the surface via the circulation of blood. The peripheral vasculature acts as a forced convection heat exchanger between blood and local peripheral tissues throughout the body enabling heat to be convected to the skin surface where is may be transferred to and from the environment via conduction, convection, radiation, and/or evaporation of water as local conditions dictate. Humans have evolved a particular vascular structure in glabrous (hairless) skin that is especially well suited for heat exchange. These vessels are called arteriovenous anastomoses (AVAs) and can vasodilate to large diameters and accommodate high flow rates. We report herein a new technology based on a physiological principle that enables simple and safe access to the thermoregulatory control system to allow manipulation of thermoregulatory function. The technology operates by applying a small amount of heating local to control tissue on the body surface overlying the cerebral spine that upregulates AVA perfusion. Under this action, heat exchangers can be applied to glabrous skin, preferably on the palms and soles, to alter the temperature of elevated blood flow prior to its return to the core. Therapeutic and prophylactic applications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura H Namisnak
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
| | - Shahab Haghayegh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Biostatics, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02138
| | - Sepideh Khoshnevis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
| | - Kenneth R Diller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kümin M, Deery J, Turney S, Price C, Vinayakam P, Smith A, Filippa A, Wilkinson-Guy L, Moore F, O'Sullivan M, Dunbar M, Gaylard J, Newman J, Harper CM, Minney D, Parkin C, Mew L, Pearce O, Third K, Shirley H, Reed M, Jefferies L, Hewitt-Gray J, Scarborough C, Lambert D, Jones CI, Bremner S, Fatz D, Perry N, Costa M, Scarborough M. Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): Results of a pilot study comparing the influence of forced air and resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infections following orthopaedic implant surgery. J Hosp Infect 2019; 103:412-419. [PMID: 31493477 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active warming during surgery prevents perioperative hypothermia but the effectiveness and postoperative infection rates may differ between warming technologies. AIM To establish the recruitment and data management strategies needed for a full trial comparing postoperative infection rates associated with forced air warming (FAW) versus resistive fabric warming (RFW) in patients aged >65 years undergoing hemiarthroplasty following fractured neck of femur. METHODS Participants were randomized 1:1 in permuted blocks to FAW or RFW. Hypothermia was defined as a temperature of <36°C at the end of surgery. Primary outcomes were the number of participants recruited and the number with definitive deep surgical site infections. FINDINGS A total of 515 participants were randomized at six sites over a period of 18 months. Follow-up was completed for 70.1%. Thirty-seven participants were hypothermic (7.5% in the FAW group; 9.7% in the RFW group). The mean temperatures before anaesthesia and at the end of surgery were similar. For the primary clinical outcome, there were four deep surgical site infections in the FAW group and three in the RFW group. All participants who developed a postoperative infection had antibiotic prophylaxis, a cemented prosthesis, and were operated under laminar airflow; none was hypothermic. There were no serious adverse events related to warming. CONCLUSION Surgical site infections were identified in both groups. Progression from the pilot to the full trial is possible but will need to take account of the high attrition rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kümin
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Deery
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - S Turney
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - C Price
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - P Vinayakam
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - A Smith
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - A Filippa
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - F Moore
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M O'Sullivan
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Dunbar
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Gaylard
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - J Newman
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - C M Harper
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - D Minney
- Milton Keynes University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - C Parkin
- Milton Keynes University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - L Mew
- Milton Keynes University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - O Pearce
- Milton Keynes University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - K Third
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - H Shirley
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Reed
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - L Jefferies
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Hewitt-Gray
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - C Scarborough
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - D Lambert
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - C I Jones
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - S Bremner
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - D Fatz
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - N Perry
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - M Costa
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Scarborough
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aalirezaie A, Akkaya M, Barnes CL, Bengoa F, Bozkurt M, Cichos KH, Ghanem E, Darouiche RO, Dzerins A, Gursoy S, Illiger S, Karam JA, Klaber I, Komnos G, Lohmann C, Merida E, Mitt P, Nelson C, Paner N, Perez-Atanasio JM, Reed M, Sangster M, Schweitzer D, Simsek ME, Smith BM, Stocks G, Studers P, Talevski D, Teuber J, Travers C, Vince K, Wolf M, Yamada K, Vince K. General Assembly, Prevention, Operating Room Environment: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:S105-S115. [PMID: 30348570 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection is associated with a substantial healthcare burden and remains one of the most challenging complications to treat. Airborne particles carrying contaminating micro-organisms are responsible for the majority of these infections. METHODS Various operating theater ventilatory systems have been developed to prevent direct airborne bacterial inoculation of the surgical wound. Laminar air flow uses positive pressure air currents through filtration units to direct air streams away from the operative field in order to create an ultraclean zone around the operative site. DISCUSSION Early studies reported lower infection rates with laminar air flow and therefore it became the accepted standard for implant-related surgery. However, more recent evidence has questioned its clinical importance. The purpose of this article is to review contemporary laminar air flow handling systems and the current evidence behind their use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Jain
- 1 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wansbeck Hospital, Northumberland, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Reed
- 1 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wansbeck Hospital, Northumberland, United Kingdom.,2 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm, Heslington, York, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|