Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients

Prognostic utility of the geriatric nutritional risk index for head and neck cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential prognostic utility of geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for head and neck cancer (HNC). We selected studies and extracted data after searching the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The associations between GNRI and survival outcomes were explored by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through a random-effects meta-analysis. We included 11 studies that involved 2887 patients with HNC. The combined HR demonstrated significant associations of low GNRI with unfavorable progression-free survival (HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.32-2.65, p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.30-4.03, p < 0.001). The association between the GNRI and overall survival persisted across various subgroups. The GNRI could serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker for patients with HNC. Low GNRI scores are significantly associated with unfavorable survival outcomes.

Efficacy of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a prevalent malignancy with a poor prognosis, necessitating the identification of prognostic biomarkers to guide management. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), calculated from serum albumin and body weight, may predict survival in patients with HNC. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify this relationship. Databases were searched for studies examining the association between pretreatment GNRI and overall survival in patients with HNC. Ten studies with 2793 patients were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that low GNRI was associated with significantly worse overall survival compared to high GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]:2.84, 95% CI 2.07-3.91, p < 0.00001). Older age (HR:1.73; 95% CI, 1.35-2.22; p < 0.0001), male sex (HR:1.7; 95% CI, 1.12-2.6; p = 0.01), advanced tumor stage (HR: 2.5; 95% CI, 1.72-3.63; p < 0.00001), and higher T-/N-stage (HR = 1.69 and 1.98, respectively) were also predictive of unfavorable outcomes. The GNRI had the highest HR, suggesting potent predictive ability. Despite limitations, including retrospective design and potential publication bias, our study indicates that low pretreatment GNRI predicts poor overall survival in patients with HNC. The GNRI is an inexpensive, routinely available biomarker that could improve prognostication and guide management decisions. Additional research is warranted to validate these findings.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Real-world Setting in Japan

BACKGROUND/AIM

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has transformed the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer; however, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has not been included in major phase III trials. The clinical outcomes of ICI for NPC in real-world practice remain to be fully elucidated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients with recurrent or metastatic NPC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab at 6 institutions from April 2017 to July 2021 and investigated the correlation of clinicopathological factors and immune-related adverse events with the effects of ICI therapy and the prognosis.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was 39.1% and the disease control rate was 78.3%. The median progression-free survival was 16.8 months and overall survival has not been reached. As with other treatment procedures, the efficacy and the prognosis tended to be better in EBER-positive cases than in EBER-negative cases. The rate of significant immune-related adverse events that necessitated discontinuation of treatment was only 4.3%.

CONCLUSION

ICI monotherapy (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab) was effective and tolerable for NPC in a real-world setting.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients

Background

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a geriatric cancer. However, older adult patients are frequently underrepresented in large clinical trials.

Aims

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen (platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab) in older and younger adult patients with HNSCC.

Methods and results

Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen were retrospectively analyzed. We compare the efficacy and safety in older (aged ≥70 years) younger (aged <70 years) adult patients. Of the 86 patients examined in this study, 21 (24.4%) were older adults. There was no difference in overall response rate (46.9% vs 38.5%, P = .76), median progression‐free survival [5.7 months vs 5.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52‐1.51, P = .66] and overall survival (OS) (14.6 months vs 15.2 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43‐1.43, P = .44) in younger vs older patients. There was also no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between groups. The exploratory analysis for geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) showed the association with lower GNRI (≤98) and poor OS in older adult patients (37.7 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31‐0.89, P = .002).

Conclusions

The EXTREME regimen with optimal dose modification is safe and effective for both older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. The GNRI can be an indicator to select the older adult patients who can get benefit from the EXTREME regimen.