1
|
Hyndman ME, Paproski RJ, Kinnaird A, Fairey A, Marks L, Pavlovich CP, Fletcher SA, Zachoval R, Adamcova V, Stejskal J, Aprikian A, Wallis CJD, Pink D, Vasquez C, Beatty PH, Lewis JD. Development of an effective predictive screening tool for prostate cancer using the ClarityDX machine learning platform. NPJ Digit Med 2024; 7:163. [PMID: 38902526 PMCID: PMC11190196 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01167-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The current prostate cancer (PCa) screen test, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), has a high sensitivity for PCa but low specificity for high-risk, clinically significant PCa (csPCa), resulting in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of non-csPCa. Early identification of csPCa while avoiding unnecessary biopsies in men with non-csPCa is challenging. We built an optimized machine learning platform (ClarityDX) and showed its utility in generating models predicting csPCa. Integrating the ClarityDX platform with blood-based biomarkers for clinically significant PCa and clinical biomarker data from a 3448-patient cohort, we developed a test to stratify patients' risk of csPCa; called ClarityDX Prostate. When predicting high risk cancer in the validation cohort, ClarityDX Prostate showed 95% sensitivity, 35% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, and 91% negative predictive value, at a ≥ 25% threshold. Using ClarityDX Prostate at this threshold could avoid up to 35% of unnecessary prostate biopsies. ClarityDX Prostate showed higher accuracy for predicting the risk of csPCa than PSA alone and the tested model-based risk calculators. Using this test as a reflex test in men with elevated PSA levels may help patients and their healthcare providers decide if a prostate biopsy is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Eric Hyndman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Prostate Cancer Centre, Calgary, T2P 1P9, AB, Canada
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
| | - Robert J Paproski
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kinnaird
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Kipnes Urology Centre, Edmonton, T6G 1Z1, AB, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E1, AB, Canada
| | - Adrian Fairey
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Kipnes Urology Centre, Edmonton, T6G 1Z1, AB, Canada
| | - Leonard Marks
- UCLA Health, Westwood Urology 200 Medical Plaza, Suite 140, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Christian P Pavlovich
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21287, MD, USA
| | - Sean A Fletcher
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21287, MD, USA
| | - Roman Zachoval
- Department of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vanda Adamcova
- Department of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Stejskal
- Department of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Armen Aprikian
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, H3G 2M1, QC, Canada
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5T 1P5, ON, Canada
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G 1X5, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Desmond Pink
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
| | - Catalina Vasquez
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
| | - Perrin H Beatty
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada
| | - John D Lewis
- Nanostics Inc., 4550 10230 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, T5J 4P6, AB, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2E1, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pellegrino F, Stabile A, Sorce G, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Cirulli GO, Quarta L, Leni R, Robesti D, Brembilla G, Gandaglia G, De Cobelli F, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Variability of mpMRI diagnostic performance according to the upfront individual patient risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:473-478. [PMID: 38149793 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the variation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) positive predictive value (PPV) according to each patient's risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based exclusively on clinical factors. METHODS We evaluated 999 patients with positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) receiving targeted (TBx) plus systematic prostate biopsy. We built a multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) using clinical risk factors to calculate the individual patients' risk of harboring csPCa at TBx. A second MVA tested the association between individual patients' clinical risk and mpMRI PPV accounting for the PI-RADS score. Finally, we plotted the PPV of each PI-RADS score by the individual patient pretest probability of csPCa using a LOWESS approach. RESULTS Overall, TBx found csPCa in 21%, 51%, and 80% of patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. At MVA, age, PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate volume were significantly associated with the risk of csPCa at biopsy. DRE yielded the highest odds ratio (OR: 2.88; p < 0.001). The individual patient's clinical risk was significantly associated with mpMRI PPV (OR: 2.49; p < 0.001) using MVA. Plotting the mpMRI PPV according to the predicted clinical risks, we observed that for patients with clinical risk close to 0 versus patients with risk higher than 90%, the mpMRI PPV of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 ranged from 0% to 75%, from 0% to 96%, and from 45% to 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION mpMRI PPV varies according to the individual pretest patient's risk based on clinical factors. These findings should be considered in the decision-making process for patients with suspect MRI findings referred for a prostate biopsy. Moreover, our data support the need for further studies to create an individualized risk prediction tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baston C, Preda A, Iordache A, Olaru V, Surcel C, Sinescu I, Gingu C. How to Integrate Prostate Cancer Biomarkers in Urology Clinical Practice: An Update. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:316. [PMID: 38254807 PMCID: PMC10813985 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, the management of prostate cancer has become more and more challenging due to the increasing number of available treatment options, therapeutic agents, and our understanding of its carcinogenesis and disease progression. Moreover, currently available risk stratification systems used to facilitate clinical decision-making have limitations, particularly in providing a personalized and patient-centered management strategy. Although prognosis and prostate cancer-specific survival have improved in recent years, the heterogenous behavior of the disease among patients included in the same risk prognostic group negatively impacts not only our clinical decision-making but also oncological outcomes, irrespective of the treatment strategy. Several biomarkers, along with available tests, have been developed to help clinicians in difficult decision-making scenarios and guide management strategies. In this review article, we focus on the scientific evidence that supports the clinical use of several biomarkers considered by professional urological societies (and included in uro-oncological guidelines) in the diagnosis process and specific difficult management strategies for clinically localized or advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalin Baston
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Adrian Preda
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Alexandru Iordache
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Vlad Olaru
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Cristian Surcel
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Ioanel Sinescu
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Constantin Gingu
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferro M, Rocco B, Maggi M, Lucarelli G, Falagario UG, Del Giudice F, Crocetto F, Barone B, La Civita E, Lasorsa F, Brescia A, Catellani M, Busetto GM, Tataru OS, Terracciano D. Beyond blood biomarkers: the role of SelectMDX in clinically significant prostate cancer identification. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2023; 23:1061-1070. [PMID: 37897252 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2277366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New potential biomarkers to pre-intervention identification of a clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) will prevent overdiagnosis and overtreatment and limit quality of life impairment of PCa patients. AREAS COVERED We have developed a comprehensive review focusing our research on the increasing knowledge of the role of SelectMDX® in csPCa detection. Areas identified as clinically relevant are the ability of SelectMDX® to predict csPCa in active surveillance setting, its predictive ability when combined with multiparametric MRI and the role of SelectMDX® in the landscape of urinary biomarkers. EXPERT OPINION Several PCa biomarkers have been developed either alone or in combination with clinical variables to improve csPCa detection. SelectMDX® score includes genomic markers, age, PSA, prostate volume, and digital rectal examination. Several studies have shown consistency in the ability to improve detection of csPCa, avoidance of unnecessary prostate biopsies, helpful in decision-making for clinical benefit of PCa patients with future well designed, and impactful studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science, University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via A. Di Rudini 8, Milan 20142, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Umberto I - 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Via A.Gramsci 89/91, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5 - 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology Unit, AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Via Ferdinando Palasciano, 81100 Caserta , Italy
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I 40 - 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Piazza Umberto I - 70121, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Brescia
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Michele Catellani
- Department of Urology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Via A.Gramsci 89/91, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mures, Gh Marinescu 35, 540142 Târgu Mures, Romania
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Corso Umberto I 40 - 80138 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wagaskar VG, Levy M, Ratnani P, Sullimada S, Gerenia M, Schlussel K, Choudhury S, Gabriele M, Haas I, Haines K, Tewari A. A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2022; 6:e1668. [PMID: 36168681 PMCID: PMC9875685 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 70%-80% of prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies performed in the US annually may be unnecessary. Specific antigen testing (PSA) and tans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) are imprecise predictive methods for risk of PCa. Novel strategies are critical to guide biopsy decision-making. AIM We assessed the utility and accuracy of combining Select MDx and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scores for predicting risk of PCa. METHODS AND RESULTS Our study was conducted at Mount Sinai hospital at Urology department in New York City from January 2020 to April 2021. Total 129 men performed select MDx test. Indications for prostate biopsy were high-risk Select MDx score, suspicious DRE, PI-RADS scores 3/4/5 on mpMRI, or any combination of these. Fifty-one percentage of 129 patients underwent systemic or combined systemic and MRI/US (ultrasound) fusion biopsy; All men underwent 3 T MRI of Prostate w/wo contrast using standard protocols prior to biopsy. A single surgeon performed prostate biopsies. Gleason score ≥3 + 3 on biopsy is defined as outcome. Descriptive statistics were calculated as cross tables. Binary logistic regression model is used to determine the outcome. The nomogram was based on the coefficients of the logit function. ROCs were plotted and decision curve analysis was performed. Using both high-risk Select MDx and PI-RADS scores of 4/5, 87% of biopsies could have been avoided, while detecting 64% of PCa and missing 36%. If biopsies were performed on men with positive Select MDx or PI-RADS 4/5 results, 16% of biopsies could have been avoided while detecting all PCa. Combining these scores improved specificity and accuracy for the detection of PCa over either used alone. Study limitations include limited sample size, sole institution study, and risk or overfitting for the proposed model which may limit generalizability. CONCLUSION Combining SelectMDx and mpMRI PI-PADS scores of 4/5 may be useful for PCa biopsy decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak G. Wagaskar
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Micah Levy
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Parita Ratnani
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Sharmila Sullimada
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Mae Gerenia
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Kacie Schlussel
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Samia Choudhury
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Marla Gabriele
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Ian Haas
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Kenneth Haines
- Department of PathologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Ash Tewari
- Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparative Analysis of PSA Density and an MRI-Based Predictive Model to Improve the Selection of Candidates for Prostate Biopsy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102374. [PMID: 35625978 PMCID: PMC9139805 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This study is a head-to-head comparison between mPSAD and MRI-PMbdex. The MRI-PMbdex was created from 2432 men with suspected PCa; this cohort comprised the development and external validation cohorts of the Barcelona MRI predictive model. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and 2 to 4-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for suspicious lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were scheduled. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as Gleason-based Grade Group 2 or higher, was detected in 934 men (38.4%). The area under the curve was 0.893 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.880−0.906) for MRI-PMbdex and 0.764 (95% CI: 0.774−0.783) for mPSAD, with p < 0.001. MRI-PMbdex showed net benefit over biopsy in all men when the probability of csPCa was greater than 2%, while mPSAD did the same when the probability of csPCa was greater than 18%. Thresholds of 13.5% for MRI-PMbdex and 0.628 ng/mL2 for mPSAD had 95% sensitivity for csPCa and presented 51.1% specificity for MRI-PMbdex and 19.6% specificity for mPSAD, with p < 0.001. MRI-PMbdex exhibited net benefit over mPSAD in men with prostate imaging report and data system (PI-RADS) <4, while neither exhibited any benefit in men with PI-RADS 5. Hence, we can conclude that MRI-PMbdex is more accurate than mPSAD for the proper selection of candidates for prostate biopsy among men with suspected PCa, with the exception of men with a PI-RAD S 5 score, for whom neither tool exhibited clinical guidance to determine the need for biopsy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Campistol M, Morote J, Regis L, Celma A, Planas J, Trilla E. Proclarix, A New Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Mol Diagn Ther 2022; 26:273-281. [PMID: 35471698 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-022-00584-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has improved the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, an appropriate selection of men for mpMRI or prostate biopsy is still challenging, which is why new biomarkers or predictive models are recommended to determine those patients who will benefit from prostate biopsy. Proclarix is a new test that provides the risk of csPCa based on thrombospondin-1 (THBS1), cathepsin D (CTSD), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), as well as age. This systematic review analyzes the current clinical status of Proclarix and future development. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was carried out by two independent reviewers. The Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms 'prostate', 'thrombospondin-1', 'cathepsin-D' and 'Proclarix' were used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) selection criteria were followed. Finally, four articles analyzed the clinical usefulness of Proclarix. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Proclarix has been developed in men with PSA levels between 2 and 10 ng/mL, normal digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate volume (PV) ≥ 35 cm3. Proclarix is associated with the PCa grade group and is more effective than %fPSA in detecting csPCa. Two studies analyzed the efficacy of Proclarix in men undergoing guided and systematic biopsies, obtaining similar results to PSA density. CONCLUSION Initial studies have shown the potential benefit of Proclarix in patients with specific characteristics. Future studies are needed to verify the clinical usefulness of Proclarix in men with suspected PCa before and after mpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Míriam Campistol
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. .,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucas Regis
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Celma
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jacques Planas
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Trilla
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wagaskar VG, Levy M, Ratnani P, Moody K, Garcia M, Pedraza AM, Parekh S, Pandav K, Shukla B, Prasad S, Sobotka S, Haines K, Punnen S, Wiklund P, Tewari A. Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 28:9-16. [PMID: 34337520 PMCID: PMC8317880 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). It is not yet established whether all men with negative MRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 score <3) should undergo prostate biopsy or not. Objective To develop and validate a prediction model that uses clinical parameters to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies by predicting PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) for men with negative MRI findings who are at risk of harboring PCa. Design setting and participants This was a retrospective analysis of 200 men with negative MRI at risk of PCa who underwent prostate biopsy (2014-2020) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml, 4Kscore of >7%, PSA density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm3, and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. The validation cohort included 182 men from another centre (University of Miami) with negative MRI who underwent systematic prostate biopsy with the same criteria. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis csPCa was defined as Gleason grade group ≥2 on biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using coefficients of logit function for predicting PCa and csPCa. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of PCa and csPCa. Results and limitations Of 200 men in the development cohort, 18% showed PCa and 8% showed csPCa on biopsy. Of 182 men in the validation cohort, 21% showed PCa and 6% showed csPCa on biopsy. PSA density, 4Kscore, and family history of PCa were significant predictors for PCa and csPCa. The AUC was 0.80 and 0.87 for prediction of PCa and csPCa, respectively. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of PCa in the validation cohort. Using the prediction model at threshold of 40, 47% of benign biopsies and 15% of indolent PCa cases diagnosed could be avoided, while missing 10% of csPCa cases. The small sample size and number of events are limitations of the study. Conclusions Our prediction model can reduce the number of prostate biopsies among men with negative MRI without compromising the detection of csPCa. Patient summary We developed a tool for selection of men with negative MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) findings for prostate cancer who should undergo prostate biopsy. This risk prediction tool safely reduces the number of men who need to undergo the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak G Wagaskar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Micah Levy
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parita Ratnani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kate Moody
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mariely Garcia
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adriana M Pedraza
- Department of Urology, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Sneha Parekh
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Krunal Pandav
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bhavya Shukla
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sonya Prasad
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stanislaw Sobotka
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Haines
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ash Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wagaskar VG, Sobotka S, Ratnani P, Young J, Lantz A, Parekh S, Falagario UG, Li L, Lewis S, Haines K, Punnen S, Wiklund P, Tewari A. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 4:e1357. [PMID: 33661541 PMCID: PMC8388161 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The detection of prostate cancer requires histological confirmation in biopsy core. Currently, number of unnecessary prostate biopsies are being performed in the United States. This is due to the absence of appropriate biopsy decision‐making protocol. Aim To develop and validate a 4K score/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)‐based nomogram to predict prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and unfavorable prostate cancer (uPCa). Methods and Results Retrospective, single‐center study evaluating a cohort of 574 men with 4K score test >7% or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) scores 3, 4, or 5 on mpMRI that underwent systematic and/or mpMRI/ultrasound fusion–targeted prostate biopsy between 2016 and 2020. External cohort included 622 men. csPCa and uPCa were defined as Gleason score ≥3 + 4 and ≥4 + 3 on biopsy, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build nomogram for predicting PCa, csPCa, and uPCa. Validation was performed by plotting the area under the curve (AUC) and comparing nomogram‐predicted probabilities with actual rates of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa probabilities in the external cohort. 4K score, a PI‐RADS ≥4, prostate volume and prior negative biopsy were significant predictors of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa. AUCs were 0.84, 0.88, and 0.86 for the prediction of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa, respectively. The predicted and actual rates of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa showed agreement across all percentage probability ranges in the validation cohort. Using the prediction model at threshold of 30, 30% of overall biopsies, 41% of benign biopsies, and 19% of diagnosed indolent PCa could be avoided, while missing 9% of csPCa. Conclusion This novel nomogram would reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and decrease detection of clinically insignificant PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak G Wagaskar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stanislaw Sobotka
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Parita Ratnani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Young
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna Lantz
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sneha Parekh
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Li Li
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sara Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Haines
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ash Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|