Pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole granules versus tablets, and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole granules in healthy adults-cross-study comparison

Development of a Pediatric Relative Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Database and Identification of Putative Risk Factors Associated With Evaluation of Pediatric Oral Products

Generally, bioequivalence (BE) studies of drug products for pediatric patients are conducted in adults due to ethical reasons. Given the lack of direct BE assessment in pediatric populations, the aim of this work is to develop a database of BE and relative bioavailability (relative BA) studies conducted in pediatric populations and to enable the identification of risk factors associated with certain drug substances or products that may lead to failed BE or different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in relative BA studies in pediatrics. A literature search from 1965 to 2020 was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify BE studies conducted in pediatric populations and relative BA studies conducted in pediatric populations. Overall, 79 studies covering 37 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) were included in the database: 4 bioequivalence studies with data that passed BE evaluations; 2 studies showed bioinequivalence results; 34 relative BA studies showing comparable PK parameters, and 39 relative BA studies showing differences in PK parameters between test and reference products. Based on the above studies, common putative risk factors associated with differences in relative bioavailability (DRBA) in pediatric populations include age-related absorption effects, high inter-individual variability, and poor study design. A database containing 79 clinical studies on BE or relative BA in pediatrics has been developed. Putative risk factors associated with DRBA in pediatric populations are summarized.

Effect of Food and Dosing Regimen on Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy-A Literature Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-choice drugs used to prevent and treat acid-related diseases. However, a lack of satisfactory response to the standard PPI dose ("PPI failure") is often reported, especially in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Poor compliance seems to be one of the main causes of PPI failure; hence, it is crucial to gain knowledge on how to properly administer PPIs. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the effect of food, beverages, and dosing regimen on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs and to frame recommendations for healthcare professionals to improve both patient's counseling and compliance to treatment with PPIs. A total of 201 papers were identified following a literature search. After full-text evaluation, 64 studies were included in the review. Co-administration of PPIs with a meal may affect both their bioavailability and effectiveness; however, the influence of food depends on the type of drug and its formulation. Except for pantoprazole, PPIs can be administered in the morning or evening; however, morning intake generally provides better daytime control of gastric acidity. In most cases, the choice of the proper schedule of administration should be based on the patient's symptoms and individual dosing preferences.

Determination of healthcare resource and cost implications of using alternative sodium valproate formulations in the treatment of epilepsy in children in England: A retrospective database review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the adherence, healthcare resource and cost implications of using Episenta® minitablets or Epilim® monolithic tablet in the treatment of epilepsy in children in England.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of healthcare administrative databases.

SETTING

The study analysed data collected from Primary Care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)) and Secondary Care (Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)) in England, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (stratified by age 0-12; 0-17 and 18+ years) with a diagnosis of epilepsy in receipt of a new prescription for Episenta® minitablets or Epilim® monolithic tablet from January 2012 to October 2017. Limited to those with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Determining the impact of sodium valproate formulation on measures of treatment adherence and healthcare resource usage.

RESULTS

There were 793 patients in the dataset: 84 on Episenta® minitablets and 709 on Epilim® tablets. Measures of medication adherence were not significantly different between the minitablet formulation and the monolithic matrix tablet. However there was a greater annualised incidence rate of epilepsy related primary healthcare contacts in a paediatric population from the tablet formulation compared to those treated with minitablets (95% CI [-1.561,0.0152]) for those aged 0-12 and (95% CI [-1.3234,-0.0058]) for those aged 0-17. This is found despite a lower dose being used in the minitablet cohort (595 mg vs 945 mg for the tablet) for those aged 0-17 which indicates effective therapy at a lower dose using the minitablet compared to the monolithic tablet formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Minitablet formulations of sodium valproate (presented as granules in capsules or sachets) can provide better therapeutic outcomes and reduced associated healthcare resource costs compared to monolithic tablets in children and young people with epilepsy. The interpretation of this data is limited by the large difference in sample size between the two groups which needs additional investigation to generate matched data for future comparisons. Further work is required to understand why the Episenta® minitablets formulation generated better outcomes in paediatric populations.