Effects of Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Lenvatinib (E7080) in Healthy Participants

Anti-Angiogenic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Related Toxicities Among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Targeting of angiogenesis has become a major therapeutic approach for the treatment of various advanced cancers. There are many unresolved questions on the toxicity of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis to assess the toxicity prevalence of the different anti-angiogenic TKIs among cancer patients and in subpopulations of interest including patients with renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases to November 2023. Clinical trials were eligible if they set out to report the grade ≥3 toxicities related to one of the seven currently approved anti-angiogenic TKIs as monotherapies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was applied with PROSPERO (CRD42023411946).

RESULTS

The 421 eligible studies included a total of 56,895 cancer patients treated with anti-angiogenic TKI monotherapy. Twenty-four different cancer types were identified, mainly renal cell carcinoma (41.9% of the patients). The anti-angiogenic TKI was sorafenib (34.5% of the patients), sunitinib (30.5%), regorafenib (10.7%), pazopanib (9.4%), cabozantinib (7.7%), axitinib (4.3%), and lenvatinib (2.9%). The pooled prevalence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities was 56.1% (95% confidence interval 53.5-58.6), with marked between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 96.8%). Toxicity profiles varied considerably depending on the type of TKI, the cancer type, and the specific patient characteristics. In particular, Asian patients and elderly people had higher prevalences of severe toxicities, with pazopanib being the best-tolerated drug. For patients treated with sunitinib, particularly those with metastatic RCC, there was no significant difference in terms of toxicity according to the regimen schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis highlights the toxicity profiles of anti-angiogenic TKI monotherapies, and thus enables high-level recommendations for the choice of anti-angiogenic TKIs on the basis of the patient's age, ethnicity, comorbidities, and comedications, for personalized treatment.

New insights into the mechanism of resistance to lenvatinib and strategies for lenvatinib sensitization in hepatocellular carcinoma

Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor that suppresses vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα), as well as the proto-oncogenes RET and KIT. Lenvatinib has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to its superior efficacy when compared to sorafenib. Unfortunately, the development of drug resistance to lenvatinib is becoming increasingly common. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify the factors that lead to drug resistance and ways to mitigate it. We summarize the molecular mechanisms that lead to lenvatinib resistance (LR) in HCC, which involve programmed cell death (PCD), translocation processes, and changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and provide strategies to reverse resistance.

Strategies and Recent Advances on Improving Efficient Antitumor of Lenvatinib Based on Nanoparticle Delivery System

Lenvatinib (LVN) is a potentially effective multiple-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treating hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma and thyroid cancer. Nonetheless, poor pharmacokinetic properties including poor water solubility and rapid metabolic, complex tumor microenvironment, and drug resistance have impeded its satisfactory therapeutic efficacy. This article comprehensively reviews the uses of nanotechnology in LVN to improve antitumor effects. With the characteristic of high modifiability and loading capacity of the nano-drug delivery system, an active targeting approach, controllable drug release, and biomimetic strategies have been devised to deliver LVN to target tumors in sequence, compensating for the lack of passive targeting. The existing applications and advances of LVN in improving therapeutic efficacy include improving longer-term efficiency, achieving higher efficiency, combination therapy, tracking and diagnosing application and reducing toxicity. Therefore, using multiple strategies combined with photothermal, photodynamic, and immunoregulatory therapies potentially overcomes multi-drug resistance, regulates unfavorable tumor microenvironment, and yields higher synergistic antitumor effects. In brief, the nano-LVN delivery system has brought light to the war against cancer while at the same time improving the antitumor effect. More intelligent and multifunctional nanoparticles should be investigated and further converted into clinical applications in the future.

Modeling the complexity of drug-drug interactions: A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic study of Lenvatinib with Schisantherin A/Schisandrin A

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib's efficacy as a frontline targeted therapy for radioactive iodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma owes to its inhibition of multiple tyrosine kinases. However, as a CYP3A4 substrate, lenvatinib bears susceptibility to pharmacokinetic modulation by co-administered agents. Schisantherin A (STA) and schisandrin A (SIA) - bioactive lignans abundant in the traditional Chinese medicinal Wuzhi Capsule - act as CYP3A4 inhibitors, engendering the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with lenvatinib.

METHODS

To explore potential DDIs between lenvatinib and STA/SIA, we developed a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for lenvatinib and used it to construct a DDI model for lenvatinib and STA/SIA. The model was validated with clinical trial data and used to predict changes in lenvatinib exposure with combined treatment.

RESULTS

Following single-dose administration, the predicted area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of lenvatinib increased 1.00- to 1.03-fold and 1.00- to 1.01-fold, respectively, in the presence of STA/SIA. Simulations of multiple-dose regimens revealed slightly greater interactions, with lenvatinib AUC0-t and Cmax increasing up to 1.09-fold and 1.02-fold, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study developed the first PBPK and DDI models for lenvatinib as a victim drug. STA and SIA slightly increased lenvatinib exposure in simulations, providing clinically valuable information on the safety of concurrent use. Given the minimal pharmacokinetic changes, STA/SIA are unlikely to interact with lenvatinib through pharmacokinetic alterations synergistically but rather may enhance efficacy through inherent anti-cancer efficacy of STA/ SIA.

Challenges and Opportunities for In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Aldehyde Oxidase-Mediated Clearance: Toward a Roadmap for Quantitative Translation

Underestimation of aldehyde oxidase (AO)-mediated clearance by current in vitro assays leads to uncertainty in human dose projections, thereby reducing the likelihood of success in drug development. In the present study we first evaluated the current drug development practices for AO substrates. Next, the overall predictive performance of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of unbound hepatic intrinsic clearance (CLint,u) and unbound hepatic intrinsic clearance by AO (CLint,u,AO) was assessed using a comprehensive literature database of in vitro (human cytosol/S9/hepatocytes) and in vivo (intravenous/oral) data collated for 22 AO substrates (total of 100 datapoints from multiple studies). Correction for unbound fraction in the incubation was done by experimental data or in silico predictions. The fraction metabolized by AO (fmAO) determined via in vitro/in vivo approaches was found to be highly variable. The geometric mean fold errors (gmfe) for scaled CLint,u (mL/min/kg) were 10.4 for human hepatocytes, 5.6 for human liver cytosols, and 5.0 for human liver S9, respectively. Application of these gmfe's as empirical scaling factors improved predictions (45%-57% within twofold of observed) compared with no correction (11%-27% within twofold), with the scaling factors qualified by leave-one-out cross-validation. A road map for quantitative translation was then proposed following a critical evaluation on the in vitro and clinical methodology to estimate in vivo fmAO In conclusion, the study provides the most robust system-specific empirical scaling factors to date as a pragmatic approach for the prediction of in vivo CLint,u,AO in the early stages of drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Confidence remains low when predicting in vivo clearance of AO substrates using in vitro systems, leading to de-prioritization of AO substrates from the drug development pipeline to mitigate risk of unexpected and costly in vivo impact. The current study establishes a set of empirical scaling factors as a pragmatic tool to improve predictability of in vivo AO clearance. Developing clinical pharmacology strategies for AO substrates by utilizing mass balance/clinical drug-drug interaction data will help build confidence in fmAO.

Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of azoles on pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in rats both in vivo and in vitro by UPLC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors. This study aims to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between lenvatinib and various azoles (ketoconazole, voriconazole, isavuconazole and posaconazole) when orally administered to rats.

METHODS

A total of 30 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated into five groups and administered 20 mg/kg of ketoconazole, voriconazole, isavuconazole and 30 mg/kg of posaconazole and 0.5% CMC-Na, through gavage for a duration of 7 days prior to the commencement of the experiment. On the final day, the rats were given 10 mg/kg of lenvatinib. The blood concentration of lenvatinib was determined using UPLC-MS-MS. In vitro lenvatinib were incubated with azoles and rat liver microsomes (RLMs) or human liver microsomes (HLMs). Molecular docking was lastly used to examine the binding strength of the enzymes and ligands with Autodock Vina.

RESULTS

AUC and Cmax of lenvatinib significantly increased with each of the azoles (p < 0.05), whereas CLz/F decreased 0.83-flod, 0.41-fold (p < 0.05) and 0.72-fold (p < 0.01) in voriconazole, isavuconazole and ketoconazole in rats. The IC50 of lenvatinib with the azoles were 0.237, 1.300, 0.355 and 2.403 μM in RLMs and 0.160, 1.933, 3.622 and 1.831 μM in HLMs. Molecular docking analysis suggested that azoles exhibited a strong binding ability towards the target enzymes.

CONCLUSION

It is imperative to acknowledge the potential drug-drug interactions mediated by CYP3A4 between azoles and lenvatinib, as these interactions hold significant implications for their clinical utilization.

Pharmacokinetic considerations for angiogenesis inhibitors used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth malignancy in terms of frequency and the fourth malignancy in terms of cancer-related death worldwide. Systemic therapy of advanced HCC has probably gone through the greatest wave of change in the last decade, with the introduction of several anti-angiogenic drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, able to significantly improve patients' prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the pharmacokinetic characteristic of the antiangiogenic drugs currently approved for the treatment of HCC, from oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib and cabozantinib) to monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab and ramucirumab), focusing on the main aspects that differ among compounds from the same class, on factors that can exert an influence on pharmacokinetic parameters and the main issues that could limit their clinical use.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-angiogenic drugs have different profiles in terms of bioavailability, metabolism, elimination and interindividual variability in their pharmacokinetics and effectiveness. More studies should be developed to address the intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing pharmacokinetics parameters to improve the individual therapeutic response and, furthermore, to evaluate the benefit and the harm of systemic therapy for advanced HCC in selected patients with liver impairment.

Pilot Study on the Impact of Polymorphisms Linked to Multi-Kinase Inhibitor Metabolism on Lenvatinib Side Effects in Patients with Advanced Thyroid Cancer

Multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) represent the best therapeutic option in advanced thyroid cancer patients. The therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of MKIs are very heterogeneous and are difficult to predict before starting treatment. Moreover, due to the development of severe adverse events, it is necessary to interrupt the therapy some patients. Using a pharmacogenetic approach, we evaluated polymorphisms in genes coding for proteins involved with the absorption and elimination of the drug in 18 advanced thyroid cancer patients treated with lenvatinib, and correlated the genetic background with (1) diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and epigastric pain; (2) oral mucositis and xerostomia; (3) hypertension and proteinuria; (4) asthenia; (5) anorexia and weight loss; (6) hand foot syndrome. Analyzed variants belong to cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4 rs2242480 and rs2687116 and CYP3A5 rs776746) genes and to ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABCB1 rs1045642, rs2032582 and rs2235048 and ABCG2 rs2231142). Our results suggest that the GG genotype for rs2242480 in CYP3A4 and CC genotype in rs776746 for CYP3A5 were both associated with the presence of hypertension. Being heterozygous for SNPs in the ABCB1 gene (rs1045642 and 2235048) implicated a higher grade of weight loss. The ABCG2 rs2231142 statistically correlated with a higher extent of mucositis and xerostomia (CC genotype). Heterozygous and rare homozygous genotypes for rs2242480 in CYP3A4 and for rs776746 for CYP3A5 were found to be statistically linked to a worse outcome. Evaluating the genetic profile before starting lenvatinib treatment may help to predict the occurrence and grade of some side effects, and may contribute to improving patient management.

Lenvatinib resistance mechanism and potential ways to conquer

Lenvatinib (LVN) has been appoved to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma, differentiated thyroid carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma. Further other cancer types also have been tried in pre-clinic and clinic without approvation by FDA. The extensive use of lenvastinib in clinical practice is sufficient to illustrate its important therapeutic role. Although the drug resistance has not arised largely in clinical, the studies focusing on the resistance of LVN increasingly. In order to keep up with the latest progress of resistance caused by LVN, we summerized the latest studies from identify published reports. In this review, we found the latest report about resistance caused by lenvatinib, which were contained the hotspot mechanism such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ferroptosis, RNA modification and so on. The potential ways to conquer the resistance of LVN were embraced by nanotechnology, CRISPR technology and traditional combined strategy. The latest literature review of LVN caused resistance would bring some ways for further study of LVN. We call for more attention to the pharmacological parameters of LVN in clinic, which was rarely and would supply key elements for drug itself in human beings and help to find the resistance target or idea for further study.

Co-administration of MDR1 and BCRP or EGFR/PI3K inhibitors overcomes lenvatinib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma

Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer; however, some patients become refractory to lenvatinib. The underlying mechanism of lenvatinib resistance (LR) in patients with advanced HCC remains unclear. We focused on exploring the potential mechanism of LR and novel treatments of lenvatinib-resistant HCC. In particular, we established a Huh7 LR cell line and performed in vitro, bioinformatic, and biochemical assays. Additionally, we used a Huh7-LR cell-derived xenograft mouse model to confirm the results in vivo. Following LR induction, multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters were markedly upregulated, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), MEK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT pathways were activated. In vitro, the co-administration of elacridar, a dual MDR1 and BCRP inhibitor, with lenvatinib inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis of LR cells. These effects might be due to inhibiting cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) properties, by decreasing colony formation and downregulating CD133, EpCAM, SOX-9, and c-Myc expression. Moreover, the co-administration of gefitinib, an EGFR inhibitor, with lenvatinib retarded proliferation and induced apoptosis of LR cells. These similar effects might be caused by the inhibition of EGFR-mediated MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway activation. In vivo, co-administration of lenvatinib with elacridar or gefitinib suppressed tumour growth and angiogenesis. Therefore, inhibiting MDR1 and BCRP transporters or targeting the EGFR/PI3K pathway might overcome LR in HCC. Notably, lenvatinib should be used to treat HCC after LR induction owing to its role in inhibiting tumour proliferation and angiogenesis. Our findings could help develop novel and effective treatment strategies for HCC.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Canagliflozin and Sorafenib or Lenvatinib in Rats

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are common clinical conditions, and T2DM is an independent risk factor for HCC. Sorafenib and lenvatinib, two multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are first-line therapies for advanced HCC, while canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, is widely used in the treatment of T2DM. Here, we developed an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of canagliflozin, sorafenib, and lenvatinib, and investigated the pharmacokinetic drug interactions between canagliflozin and sorafenib or lenvatinib in rats. The animals were randomly divided into five groups. Groups I–III were gavage administrated with sorafenib, lenvatinib, and canagliflozin, respectively. Group IV received sorafenib and canagliflozin; while Group V received lenvatinib and canagliflozin. The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) and maximum plasma concentrations (C_max) of canagliflozin increased by 37.6% and 32.8%, respectively, while the apparent volume of distribution (V_z/F) and apparent clearance (CL_z/F) of canagliflozin significantly decreased (30.6% and 28.6%, respectively) in the presence of sorafenib. Canagliflozin caused a significant increase in AUC and C_max of lenvatinib by 28.9% and 36.2%, respectively, and a significant decrease in V_z/F and CL_z/F of lenvatinib by 52.9% and 22.7%, respectively. In conclusion, drug interactions exist between canagliflozin and sorafenib or lenvatinib, and these findings provide a reference for the use of these drugs in patients with HCC and T2DM.

Association between pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in healthy subjects and genetic polymorphisms of ABCB1 3435C>T and ABCB1 2677G>T/A

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of genetic polymorphisms in the pharmacokinetics of metabolism and transportation of lenvatinib in the Chinese population.Sixty-three healthy Chinese individuals were recruited and administered with a single dose of 4 mg lenvatinib. Allelic discriminations for 10 SNPs of CYP3A4 (20230 G>A(*1G)), CYP3A5 (6986 A>G(*3)), ABCB1 (1236 C>T, 2677 G>T/A, 3435 C>T), ABCG2 (421 C>A, 34 G>A), ABCC2 (-24 C>T, 1249 G>A, 3972 C>T) were performed. The concentrations of lenvatinib in the plasma were determined by UPLC-MS/MS.Under the fasting condition, individuals carrying of ABCB1 3435 C>T genotype presented lower C_max (p < 0.01) and λz (p < 0.05), but higher t_1/2 (p < 0.05) than those carrying C/C and T/T genotypes. For ABCB1 2677 G>T/A variant, individuals with the G/T and A/G genotype showed higher AUC (p < 0.05) and t_1/2 (p < 0.01), but lower λz (p < 0.05) than those carrying G/G genotypes. Individuals with the A/T, A/A and T/T genotype had higher AUC, but no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed. They also had higher t_1/2 (p < 0.01) and lower λz (p < 0.01) than those carrying G/G genotypes.Under the fed condition, no difference in any pharmacokinetic parameters were observed with any polymorphisms in the 10 fragments.Data in this paper had demonstrated that polymorphisms ABCB1 3435 C>T and ABCB1 2677 G>T/A were associated with the pharmacokinetic variability of lenvatinib.

The impact of individual human cytochrome P450 enzymes on oxidative metabolism of anticancer drug lenvatinib

Lenvatinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exhibits good inhibitory effect in several types of carcinomas. Specifically, it is the most effective TKI used for treatment of thyroid cancer. To extend pharmacokinetics data on this anticancer agent, we aimed to identify the metabolites of lenvatinib formed during in vitro incubation of lenvatinib with human hepatic microsomes or recombinant cytochromes P450 (CYPs) by using high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. The role of CYPs in the oxidation of lenvatinib was initially investigated in hepatic microsomes using specific CYP inhibitors. CYP-catalytic activities in each microsomal sample were correlated with the amounts of lenvatinib metabolites formed by these samples. Further, human recombinant CYPs were employed in the metabolic studies. Based on our data, lenvatinib is metabolized to O-desmethyl lenvatinib, N-descyclopropyl lenvatinib and lenvatinib N-oxide. In the presence of cytochrome b₅, recombinant CYP3A4 was the most efficient to form these metabolites. In addition, CYP1A1 significantly contributes to the lenvatinib metabolism. It was even more efficient in forming of O-desmethyl lenvatinib than CYP3A4 in the absence of cytochrome b₅. The present study indicates that further research focused on drug-drug interactions, in particular on CYP3A4 and CYP1A1 modulators, is needed. This will pave new avenues towards TKIs-mediated personalized therapy.

UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of Lenvatinib in rat plasma and its application to drug-drug interaction studies

Lenvatinib (LEN) is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor registered for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Wuzhi capsule (WZC) is a traditional Chinese medicine preparation; it is used to decrease the aminotransferase level of the liver and protect liver function. Thus, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are potentially treated with a combination of LEN and WZC, but there is no information about the interaction between the two drugs. We developed a simple, rapid, and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for the quantitative determination of lenvatinib in rat plasma. Liquid-liquid extraction of plasma samples was carried out with ethyl acetate. Chromatographic separation of analyte was performed using gradient elution with acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid water. The positive ion multi-response monitoring mode was used, and the target of the parent and daughter ions of LEN and IS were m/z 427.1→370 and m/z 432.1→370, respectively. All the validation projects were in accordance with the guidelines. Good linearity of 0.2-1000 ng/mL (r > 0.999) was achieved. The lower limit of quantification was 0.2 ng/mL. The precision and accuracy are acceptable. The method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetics and drug interaction analysis. The results show that WZC can significantly increase the C_max (maximum plasma concentration) and AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) of LEN. An UPLC -MS/MS method that can be used for studying drug-drug interaction as a valuable tool was developed in this study. Drug-drug interactions were observed between the WZC and LEN.

Overview of lenvatinib as a targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Patients commonly present with advanced/unresectable HCC where several treatment options are not effective. In this review, the authors discuss the indications and usage of lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor, as first-line therapy for advanced/unresectable HCC, its mode of action, efficacy, drug reactions, response to treatment and adverse effects. Since its approval in 2007, sorafenib has been used as first-line therapy for unresectable HCC. In 2018, a phase III multinational REFLECT trial on subjects with unresectable HCC (Child-Pugh class A) demonstrated that lenvatinib was non-inferior compared to sorafenib for overall survival, with a controllable toxicity profile, leading to its approval. In addition, our review discusses studies that compare the safety and efficacy profile of lenvatinib especially in patients who have a decline in their liver function to Child-Pugh class B. A current real world analysis of lenvatinib approval for unresectable HCC worldwide is reported.

A Review of CYP3A Drug-Drug Interaction Studies: Practical Guidelines for Patients Using Targeted Oral Anticancer Drugs

Many oral anticancer drugs are metabolized by CYP3A. Clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies often only examine the effect of strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers. The effect of moderate or weak inhibitors or inducers can be examined using physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulations, but data from these simulations are not always available early after approval of a drug. In this review we provide recommendations for clinical practice on how to deal with DDIs of oral anticancer drugs if only data from strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers is available. These recommendations were based on reviewed data of oral anticancer drugs primarily metabolized by CYP3A and approved for the treatment of solid tumors from January 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2015. In addition, three drugs that were registered before the new EMA guideline was issued (i.e., everolimus, imatinib, and sunitinib), were reviewed. DDIs are often complex, but if no data is available from moderate CYP3A inhibitors/inducers, a change in exposure of 50% compared with strong inhibitors/inducers can be assumed. No a priori dose adaptations are indicated for weak inhibitors/inducers, because their interacting effect is small. In case pharmacologically active metabolites are involved, the metabolic pathway, the ratio of the parent to the metabolites, and the potency of the metabolites should be taken into account.

Clinical pharmacology and drug-drug interactions of lenvatinib in thyroid cancer

Lenvatinib is a non-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with high in vitro potency against vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Although this drug is used to treat several cancer types, it is the most effective TKI used in patients with thyroid cancer. Lenvatinib is well tolerated and the most common adverse drug reactions can be adequately managed by dose adjustment. Particularly, blood pressure and cardiac function monitoring, as well as antihypertensive treatment optimization, may be required in patients treated with lenvatinib. Dose reduction should be taken into account in patients with body weight <60 kg or severe hepatic failure. No significant change in lenvatinib pharmacokinetics has been observed with other patient-related factors and very few data are available on lenvatinib pharmacogenetics. Lenvatinib can be administered orally regardless of food and no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions have been reported.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Use: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic response to oral targeted anticancer protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) varies widely between patients, with insufficient efficacy of some of them and unacceptable adverse reactions of others. There are several possible causes for this heterogeneity, such as pharmacokinetic (PK) variability affecting blood concentrations, fluctuating medication adherence, and constitutional or acquired drug resistance of cancer cells. The appropriate management of oncology patients with PKI treatments thus requires concerted efforts to optimize the utilization of these drug agents, which have probably not yet revealed their full potential.

METHODS

An extensive literature review was performed on MEDLINE on the PK, pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of PKIs (up to April 2019).

RESULTS

This review provides the criteria for determining PKIs suitable candidates for TDM (eg, availability of analytical methods, observational PK studies, PK-pharmacodynamics relationship analysis, and randomized controlled studies). It reviews the major characteristics and limitations of PKIs, the expected benefits of TDM for cancer patients receiving them, and the prerequisites for the appropriate utilization of TDM. Finally, it discusses various important practical aspects and pitfalls of TDM for supporting better implementation in the field of cancer treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptation of PKIs dosage regimens at the individual patient level, through a rational TDM approach, could prevent oncology patients from being exposed to ineffective or unnecessarily toxic drug concentrations in the era of personalized medicine.

Impact of Local Liver Irradiation Concurrent Versus Sequential with Lenvatinib on Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution

Simple Summary

Lenvatinib is a systemic treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an advanced technique of hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that can be applied in patients with HCC. The current study showed that the area under the concentration–time curve of lenvatinib concentration (AUC_lenvatinib) increased by 148.8% with radiotherapy (RT)_2Gy×3f’x (EBRT for the whole liver), and 68.9% with RT_9Gy×3f’× (SBRT targeting a 1.5 × 1.5 cm region in the center of the liver) in the sequential regimen compared to the concurrent regimen in rats. Additionally, the AUC_lenvatinib was decreased by 50% in the concurrent regimen of both RT techniques with lenvatinib compared to the control group. The biodistribution of lenvatinib in the organs at risk was markedly decreased in the concurrent regimens. The radiation–drug interactions were between lenvatinib and RT, and showed sequential preferably.

Abstract

Concurrent and sequential regimens involving radiotherapy (RT) and lenvatinib were designed with off-target or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) doses in a freely moving rat model to evaluate the effect of RT on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lenvatinib. Liver RT concurrent with lenvatinib decreased the area under the concentration–time curve of lenvatinib concentration (AUC_lenvatinib) by 51.1% with three fractions of 2 Gy (RT_2Gy×3f’x, p = 0.03), and 48.9% with RT_9Gy×3f’x (p = 0.03). The AUC_lenvatinib increased by 148.8% (p = 0.008) with RT_2Gy×3f’x, and 68.9% (p = 0.009) with RT_9Gy×3f’x in the sequential regimen compared to the concurrent regimen. There were no differences in the AUC_lenvatinib between RT_2Gy×3f’x and RT_9Gy×3f’x in the concurrent or sequential regimen. Both the RT_2Gy×3f’x and RT_9Gy×3f’x concurrent regimens markedly decreased the biodistribution of lenvatinib in the heart, liver, lung, spleen, and kidneys, which ranged from 31% to 100% for RT_2Gy×3f’x, and 11% to 100% for RT_9Gy×3f’x, compared to the sham regimen. The PK and biodistribution of lenvatinib can be modulated by simultaneous off-target irradiation and SBRT doses. The timing of lenvatinib administration with respect to RT, impacted the PK and biodistribution of the drug. Additionally, off-target and SBRT doses had a similar ability to modulate the effect of systemic therapy.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Targeted Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based on a multidisciplinary decision tree. Treatment includes loco-regional therapy, mainly transarterial chemoembolization, for intermediate-stage HCC and systemic therapy with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced HCC. Transarterial chemoembolization involves hepatic intra-arterial infusion with either conventional procedure or drug-eluting-beads. The aim of the loco-regional procedure is to deliver treatment as close as possible to the tumor both to embolize the tumor area and to enhance efficacy and minimize systemic toxicity of the anticancer drug. Pharmacokinetic studies applied to transarterial chemoembolization are rare and pharmacodynamic studies even rarer. However, all available studies lead to the same conclusions: use of the transarterial route lowers systemic exposure to the cytotoxic drug and leads to much higher tumor drug concentrations than does a similar dose via the intravenous route. However, reproducibility of the procedure remains a major problem, and no consensus exists regarding the choice of anticancer drug and its dosage. Systemic therapy with TKIs is based on sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line treatment and regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line treatment. Clinical use of TKIs is challenging because of their complex pharmacokinetics, with high liver metabolism yielding both active metabolites and their common toxicities. Changes in liver function over time with the progression of HCC adds further complexity to the use of TKIs. The challenges posed by TKIs and the HCC disease process means monitoring of TKIs is required to improve clinical management. To date, only partial data supporting sorafenib monitoring is available. Results from further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of these four TKIs are eagerly awaited and are expected to permit such monitoring and the development of consensus guidelines.

Influences of ABC transporter and CYP3A4/5 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in Chinese healthy subjects

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter genetic polymorphisms could affect the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in Chinese healthy subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy Chinese volunteers were enrolled and took oral administration of 8 mg lenvatinib. Plasma concentration of lenvatinib was determined by UPLC-MS/MS, the CYP3A4*1G, CYP3A5*3, ABCB1 (3435 C>T, 1236 C>T, 2677 G>T/A), ABCG2 (421 C>A, 34 G>A), and ABCC2-24 C>T genotypes were determined by SnapShot Technique.

RESULTS

In ABCB1 3435T carriers (n = 19), AUC_0-120h (815.7 (701.9-923.9) ng·h/mL) and AUC_0-∞ (843.3 (722.2-977.7) ng·h/mL) were significantly higher than ABCB1 3435CC homozygous subjects (n = 13, 575.3 (513.7-756.9) ng·h/mL and 590.0 (540.5-782.0) ng·h/mL, respectively); on the contrary, the clearance (CL/F) of ABCB1 3435T carriers was significantly lower (9.5 (8.2-11.1) L/h vs. 13.6 (10.4-14.8) L/h). And the C_max in CYP3A4*1G/*1G allele carrier subjects was higher than *1 carrier (73.4 ng/mL vs. 53.5 (46.1-60.6) ng/mL), but did not reach the level of significantly statistical difference. Genetic polymorphisms of ABCC2, ABCG2, and CYP3A5 could not influence pharmacokinetic parameters of lenvatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

This work presented an evidence that the ABCB1 3435 C>T polymorphism could significantly affect the exposure and clearance of lenvatinib. These findings may explain the reasons for the huge inter-individual differences in lenvatinib, and should contribute to clinical individualized treatment.

An Open-Label Phase 1 Study to Determine the Effect of Lenvatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, a CYP3A4 Substrate, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits enzyme activity but induces gene expression of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), an important enzyme for drug metabolism. We evaluated the impact of lenvatinib on CYP3A4 using midazolam as a probe substrate in patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the pharmacokinetic effects of lenvatinib on midazolam, and the secondary objective was to assess the safety of lenvatinib.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 study involved patients with advanced cancer that progressed after treatment with approved therapies or for which no standard therapies were available.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, coadministration of lenvatinib decreased the geometric mean ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for midazolam on day 1 to 0.914 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.850-0.983) but increased it on day 14 to 1.148 (90% CI 0.938-1.404). Coadministration of lenvatinib also decreased the geometric mean ratio of the maximum observed concentration for midazolam on day 1 to 0.862 (90% CI 0.753-0.988) but increased it on day 14 to 1.027 (90% CI 0.852-1.238). There was little change in the terminal elimination phase half-life of midazolam when administered with lenvatinib. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (20.0%), fatigue (16.7%), and diarrhea (10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of lenvatinib had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a CYP3A4 substrate. The adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of lenvatinib, and no new safety concerns were identified. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02686164.

Pivotal Considerations for Optimal Deployment of Healthy Volunteers in Oncology Drug Development

Oncology drug development is among the most challenging of any therapeutic area, with first-in-human trials expected to deliver information on both safety and activity. Until recently, therapeutic approaches in oncology focused on cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, ruling out even the possibility of enrolling normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) in clinical trials due to safety considerations. The emergence of noncytotoxic modalities, including molecularly targeted agents with more favorable safety profiles, however, has led to increasing numbers of clinical pharmacology studies of these agents being conducted in NHVs. Beyond rapid enrollment and cost savings, there are other advantages of conducting specific types of studies in NHVs with the goal of more appropriate dosing decisions in certain subsets of the intended patient populations, allowing for enrollment of such patients in therapeutic trials from which they might otherwise have been excluded. Nevertheless, the decision must be carefully weighed against potential disadvantages, and although the considerations surrounding conduct of clinical trials using NHVs are generally well-defined in most other therapeutic areas, they are less well-defined in oncology.

Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Improving outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target, in part, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and are approved in various regions of the world for the treatment of advanced HCC. All these agents are associated with a range of adverse events (AEs) that can have a substantial impact on patients' health-related quality of life. Fatigue, diarrhoea, hand-foot skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, hypertension and weight loss are among the most common AEs experienced with these four TKIs. In this review, we discuss strategies for the management of these AEs in patients with advanced HCC, with the aim of maximizing treatment benefits and minimizing the need for TKI treatment discontinuation. We also consider potential TKI-drug interactions and discuss the use of TKIs in patients with liver dysfunction or who have experienced tumour recurrence after liver transplantation. Use of appropriate AE management strategies and avoidance of contraindicated drugs should help patients with advanced HCC to achieve optimal outcomes with TKIs.

Influence of CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter polymorphisms on lenvatinib plasma trough concentrations in Japanese patients with thyroid cancer

Lenvatinib is a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. In this study, we aimed to evaluate how CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter polymorphisms affected the mean steady-state dose-adjusted plasma trough concentrations (C₀) of lenvatinib in a cohort of 40 Japanese patients with thyroid cancer. CYP3A4 20230G > A (*1G), CYP3A5 6986A > G (*3), ABCB1 1236C > T, ABCB1 2677G > T/A, ABCB1 3435C > T, ABCC2 −24C > T, and ABCG2 421C > A genotypes were determined using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. In univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in the mean dose-adjusted C₀ values of lenvatinib between the ABCB1, ABCG2, and CYP3A5 genotypes. However, the mean dose-adjusted C₀ values of lenvatinib in patients with the CYP3A4*1/*1 genotype and ABCC2 −24T allele were significantly higher than those in patients with the CYP3A4*1G allele and −24C/C genotype, respectively (P = 0.018 and 0.036, respectively). In multivariate analysis, CYP3A4 genotype and total bilirubin were independent factors influencing the dose-adjusted C₀ of lenvatinib (P = 0.010 and 0.046, respectively). No significant differences were found in the incidence rates of hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome following treatment with lenvatinib between the genotypes of CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporters. Lenvatinib pharmacokinetics were significantly influenced by the CYP3A4*1G polymorphism. If the target plasma concentration of lenvatinib for efficacy or toxicity is determined, elucidation of the details of the CYP3A4*1G genotype may facilitate decision-making related to the appropriate initial lenvatinib dosage to achieve optimal plasma concentrations.

Clinically relevant drug interactions with multikinase inhibitors: a review

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have rapidly become an established factor in daily (hemato)-oncology practice. Although the oral route of administration offers improved flexibility and convenience for the patient, challenges arise in the use of MKIs. As MKIs are prescribed extensively, patients are at increased risk for (severe) drug–drug interactions (DDIs). As a result of these DDIs, plasma pharmacokinetics of MKIs may vary significantly, thereby leading to high interpatient variability and subsequent risk for increased toxicity or a diminished therapeutic outcome. Most clinically relevant DDIs with MKIs concern altered absorption and metabolism. The absorption of MKIs may be decreased by concomitant use of gastric acid-suppressive agents (e.g. proton pump inhibitors) as many kinase inhibitors show pH-dependent solubility. In addition, DDIs concerning drug (uptake and efflux) transporters may be of significant clinical relevance during MKI therapy. Furthermore, since many MKIs are substrates for cytochrome P450 isoenzymes (CYPs), induction or inhibition with strong CYP inhibitors or inducers may lead to significant alterations in MKI exposure. In conclusion, DDIs are of major concern during MKI therapy and need to be monitored closely in clinical practice. Based on the current knowledge and available literature, practical recommendations for management of these DDIs in clinical practice are presented in this review.

Lenvatinib as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Since 2007 Sorafenib has represented the only approved drug for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib, an orally active inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFRa, RET and KIT), showed preclinical and clinical activity in the treatment of solid tumors, including HCC. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the current therapeutic paradigm for the systemic treatment of advanced HCC, focusing on Lenvatinib pre-clinical and clinical development. Keywords 'Lenvatinib', ' Target therapy', 'REFLECT trial', 'Hepatocellular carcinoma', 'HCC', 'Sorafenib' were used for literature search on PubMed. Expert commentary: In Phase-III multicentric REFLECT trial Lenvatinib demonstrated a non-inferior overall survival (OS) compared to Sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced HCC, with a manageable toxicity profile, becoming a valid alternative option in the therapeutic repertoire of this disease. Nevertheless, the potential role of Lenvatinib in real-life clinical practice has still to be defined, especially in the light of the positive results that have been achieved with other new therapeutic agents (e.g. immunotherapy).

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Lenvatinib, an Orally Active, Small-Molecule, Multitargeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha, and RET and KIT proto-oncogenes. Lenvatinib is approved for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer in the United States (US), European Union (EU), Canada, Japan, and Switzerland. It is also approved in combination with everolimus for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma following ≥1 VEGF-targeted treatment in the US and EU. In addition, lenvatinib is under investigation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. As lenvatinib becomes more widely available, a better understanding of its pharmacokinetic profile has become increasingly important. Following oral administration, lenvatinib is absorbed rapidly and is metabolized extensively prior to excretion. This metabolism is mediated by multiple pathways, and several metabolites of lenvatinib have been identified. The effect of food intake on lenvatinib exposure has also been studied and was found to not significantly influence overall exposure to the drug. Exposure to lenvatinib is increased in patients with severe hepatic impairment, indicating that dose reduction must be considered for those patients. The findings summarized here indicate that the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile for lenvatinib are predictable, with a dose-independent absorption and elimination profile that supports once-daily administration, and has minimal effects due to mild or moderate renal or hepatic impairment or drug interactions.

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Markers For Anti-angiogenic Cancer Therapy: Implications for Dosing and Selection of Patients

Angiogenesis is integral to tumour growth and invasion, and is a key target for cancer therapeutics. However, for many of the licensed indications, only a modest clinical benefit has been observed for both monoclonal antibody and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor anti-angiogenic therapy. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have attempted to evaluate circulating, imaging, genomic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic markers that may aid both the selection of patients for treatment and define dosing. Correct dosing is likely to be critical in the context of vascular normalization to allow better delivery of concomitant anti-cancer therapy and novel imaging techniques hold much promise in the early evaluation of pharmacodynamic response to improve efficacy.

Clinical use of lenvatinib in combination with everolimus for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2%-3% of all cancers in adults, and its pathogenesis is mainly related to altered cellular response to hypoxia. Lenvatinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), represents a therapeutic option, in combination with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus, for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC).

AIM

The objective of this article is to review the evidence about the treatment of mRCC with combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Phase I studies supported clinical activity of lenvatinib in mRCC. A randomized, Phase II, open-label, multicenter trial demonstrated the clinical efficacy of combination treatment with lenvatinib plus everolimus in patients with progressive mRCC after prior therapy with TKI. Median progression-free survival was improved by 9 months with the combination therapy compared to the single-agent everolimus, with an overall response rate of 43% for the experimental regimen. Lenvatinib plus everolimus appeared to be slightly less toxic than single-agent lenvatinib and more toxic than single-agent everolimus; grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 71% of patients. Currently, lenvatinib plus everolimus has US Food and Drug Administration approval for its use in mRCC after failure of previous treatment with TKI.

CONCLUSION

The combination therapy with lenvatinib plus everolimus might be a promising choice for second-line treatment of mRCC patients. Based on the results of the Phase II trial, it is possible to speculate that the combination therapy could be appropriate for patients with high disease burden or strongly symptomatic patients.

Lenvatinib for use in combination with everolimus for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma following one prior anti-angiogenic therapy

INTRODUCTION

In patients with mRCC options for second line therapies, following progression on anti-angiogenic agents, that demonstrate a survival advantage in clinical trials have been limited. Recently a number of agents have demonstrated efficacy in this setting. Here in we profile one such therapy, the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus, and discuss the expanded options for therapy available in this setting. Areas covered: In this review, we discuss current algorithms for treatment of mRCC in both the first-line and second-line setting. We discuss the recent addition of cabozantinib and nivolumab, in the second line setting, to the market. Lenvatinib's pharmacology, clinical efficacy and toxicity profile is discussed. A comprehensive literature review was performed using PUBMED. Expert commentary: The current treatment algorithms for mRCC will likely see significant change in the coming years. The addition of immunotherapy to our treatment options in mRCC is of particular importance. Future trials examining the use of immunotherapy, both as monotherapy and in combination with VEGF targeted therapy, will likely be a dominant influence in the therapeutic landscape of mRCC. Progress in terms of the rapid expansion of available active therapies in mRCC needs to be balanced with current deficiencies in terms of predictive biomarkers.

Managing Drug Interactions in Cancer Therapy: A Guide for the Advanced Practitioner

Mrs. P is a 30-year-old woman who presented to our bone marrow transplant program with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). She received a haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplant with a conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. This treatment was followed by post-transplant immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and tacrolimus (see Table 1 for medication list). Tacrolimus levels were monitored twice a week with adjustment to a goal range of between 5 and 10 ng/mL. We initiated tacrolimus at a dose of 0.03 mg/kg by mouth twice daily (rounded to 2 mg by mouth twice daily). Drug interactions were assessed by the clinical pharmacist prior to admission, routinely with medication changes, and then upon discharge.

Lenvatinib: A Review in Refractory Thyroid Cancer

Lenvatinib (Lenvima®) is an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1, 2 and 3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1, 2, 3 and 4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha, and RET and KIT signalling networks, which are implicated in tumour growth and maintenance. In the EU and USA, lenvatinib is indicated for the treatment of locally recurrent or metastatic progressive, radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). This approval was based on the results of the randomized, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 SELECT study, in which lenvatinib significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate compared with placebo in patients with RR-DTC. The PFS benefit with lenvatinib was seen in all pre-specified subgroups, including patients who had received either one or no prior VEGF-targeted therapy. Moreover, the PFS benefit with lenvatinib was maintained regardless of BRAF or RAS mutation status. The safety and tolerability profile of lenvatinib in SELECT was consistent with that of other VEGF/VEGF receptor-targeted therapies and was mostly manageable. Hypertension was the most common treatment-related adverse event in lenvatinib-treated patients, but only infrequently led to discontinuation of the drug. Although not collected in SELECT, information on quality of life would be useful in assessing the overall impact of therapy on the patient. This notwithstanding, the data which are available indicate that lenvatinib is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment option for patients with RR-DTC. Lenvatinib, therefore, offers an acceptable alternative to sorafenib--currently, the only other TKI approved for this indication.

Lenvatinib - A multikinase inhibitor for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer

Lenvatinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in February 2015. In a pivotal phase III study of 392 patients with progressive radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer, the overall response rate of patients receiving lenvatinib was 64.8%, with complete response in four patients. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 months in the lenvatinib arm versus 3.6 months in patients receiving placebo. Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Lenvatinib is a promising new treatment for patients with radioiodine (iodine-131)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

[Lenvatinib in radioiodine refractory thyroid carcinomas]

Differentiated thyroid cancers are usually cured by an appropriate surgery and a radioiodine remnant ablation. If metastases occur, successive radioiodine administrations and/or local treatments can be provided. Nevertheless, some patients will be, or become refractory to radioiodine. In case of significant and rapid progression of metastatic lesions, they will be candidate to kinase inhibitor treatments. Two agents are now approved in this situation: sorafenib and lenvatinib. Lenvatinib (Lenvima^®) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting the VEGFR1-3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFR-α, RET and c-kit. It received an FDA and EMA approval in February and March 2015 for the treatment of radioiodine refractory thyroid cancers following the SELECT study's results. In this study, patients treated with lenvatinib had a significant increase in progression-free survival (18.3 months vs. 3.6 months; HR=0.21; CI=0.14-0.31, P < 0.001) and response rate (64.8% vs. 1.5% with placebo). The median overall survival was not reached in both groups at the time of data cutoff. In France, lenvatinib was first available within a compassionate use program (ATU) and is now dispended by hospitals because not yet marketed.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of lenvatinib in healthy subjects and patients with cancer

AIMS

Lenvatinib was recently approved for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). Here, we characterized the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of lenvatinib and identified intrinsic and extrinsic factors that explain interindividual PK variability in humans.

METHODS

This population PK analysis used pooled data from 15 clinical studies, including eight phase 1 studies in healthy subjects, four phase 1 studies in patients with solid tumours, two phase 2 studies in patients with thyroid cancer and one phase 3 study in patients with RR-DTC.

RESULTS

The final pooled dataset included data from 779 subjects receiving 3.2-32 mg oral lenvatinib, mainly once daily as tablets or capsules. Lenvatinib PK was best described by a three-compartment model with linear elimination. Lenvatinib absorption was best described by simultaneous first- and zero-order absorption. The population mean value for lenvatinib apparent clearance (CL/F) was 6.56 l h(-1) [percent coefficient of variation (%CV) 25.5], and was independent of dose and time. The relative bioavailability of lenvatinib in capsule form was 90% vs. tablets (%CV 30.2). The final PK model included significant but marginal effects of body weight (2.8% of CL/F variation), liver-function markers [alkaline phosphatase (-11.7%) and albumin (-6.3%)] and concomitant cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers (+30%) and inhibitors (-7.8%) on lenvatinib CL/F. Lenvatinib PK was unaffected by pH-elevating agents, dose, age, sex, race, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin levels, or renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant effects of several covariates on lenvatinib PK variability were small in magnitude, and therefore were not considered clinically relevant, or to warrant any dose adjustment.

Lenvatinib: Role in thyroid cancer and other solid tumors

Despite recent breakthroughs in treatment of advanced thyroid cancers, prognoses remain poor. Treatment of advanced, progressive disease remains challenging, with limited treatment options. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including vandetanib, cabozantinib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib, which are now FDA-approved for thyroid cancer, have shown clinical benefit in advanced thyroid cancer. Lenvatinib is approved for treatment of locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). It has been studied in phase II and III trials for treatment of advanced RAI-refractory DTC, and in a phase II trial for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Lenvatinib targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1-3 (VEGFR1-3), fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-4 (FGFR-1-4), RET, c-kit, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα). Its antitumor activity may be due to antiangiogenic properties and direct antitumor effects. Lenvatinib has demonstrated antitumor activity in a variety of solid tumors, including MTC, in phase I and II clinical trials. In a phase II study in advanced RAI-refractory DTC, lenvatinib-treated patients achieved a 50% response rate (RR), with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.6 months. In a phase III trial in RAI-refractory DTC, median PFS in lenvatinib-treated patients was 18.3 months, with a 65% overall RR, versus 3.6 months in placebo-treated patients, with a 2% RR. Adverse events occurring in >50% of patients included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue/asthenia, and decreased appetite. Lenvatinib is a promising new agent for treatment of patients with advanced thyroid cancer.

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of the Multikinase Inhibitor Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors and in an Expanded Cohort of Patients with Melanoma

PURPOSE

This "3+3" phase I study evaluated the safety, biologic, and clinical activity of lenvatinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Ascending doses of lenvatinib were administered per os twice daily in 28-day cycles. Safety and response were assessed for all patients. Angiogenic and apoptotic factors were tested as possible biomarkers in an expanded melanoma cohort.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were treated in 3 cohorts: 18 with intermittent twice-daily dosing (7 days on, 7 days off) of 0.1-3.2 mg; 33 with twice-daily dosing of 3.2-12 mg; and 26 with twice-daily dosing of 10 mg (expanded melanoma cohort). Maximum tolerated dose was established at 10 mg per os twice daily. Prominent drug-related toxicities included hypertension (43%), fatigue (42%), proteinuria (39%), and nausea (25%); dose-limiting toxicities included hypertension, fatigue, and proteinuria. Twelve patients (15.6%) achieved partial response (PR, n = 9) or unconfirmed PR (uPR, n = 3), and 19 (24.7%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥23 weeks. Total PR/uPR/SD ≥23 weeks was 40.3% (n = 31). Responses (PR/uPR) by disease were as follows: melanoma, 5 of 29 patients (includes 1 patient with NRAS mutation); thyroid, 3 of 6 patients; pancreatic, 1 of 2 patients; lung, 1 of 1 patients; renal, 1 of 1 patients; endometrial, 1 of 4 patients; and ovarian, 1 of 5 patients. AUC(0-24) and C(max) increased dose proportionally. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses, increased baseline systolic blood pressure and decreased angiopoietin-1 ratio (2 hours:baseline) were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in the expanded melanoma cohort (P = 0.041 and P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of lenvatinib are encouraging. Decreases in the angiopoietin-1 ratio correlated with longer PFS in melanoma patients.