[Nodulocystic eruption induced by sorafenib]

INTRODUCTION

Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma, and differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cutaneous adverse events are numerous and occur frequently.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present two cases of nodulocystic lesions associated with comedones in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. In the first patient, a 64-year-old man, lesions appeared on the trunk one year after beginning sorafenib. Histopathological examination revealed a non-granulomatous, perivascular and perisudoral polymorphic cellular infiltrate associated with comedones and microcysts. These lesions progressed via inflammatory episodes interrupted by long periods of spontaneous remission without any specific treatment. In the second patient, a 53-year-old woman, a rash appeared on the buttocks three months after starting sorafenib and then spread to the lumbar region and thighs. Histopathological examination was consistent with granulomatous acne lesions. The initial treatment (oral tetracycline and zinc) given for 3 months proved ineffective. Patient follow-up over 3 years showed gradual regression without the appearance of any further lesions.

DISCUSSION

In the literature, several reports discuss acneiform rashes in patients treated with targeted therapy. In most cases, these lesions were papulopustular without retentional lesions. There are few reports of nodulocystic eruptions associated with comedones following sorafenib therapy. The mechanisms of emergence of these lesions seem to involve inhibition of the RAF pathway, C-KIT, and the PDGF signaling pathway.

[Lenvatinib in radioiodine refractory thyroid carcinomas]

Differentiated thyroid cancers are usually cured by an appropriate surgery and a radioiodine remnant ablation. If metastases occur, successive radioiodine administrations and/or local treatments can be provided. Nevertheless, some patients will be, or become refractory to radioiodine. In case of significant and rapid progression of metastatic lesions, they will be candidate to kinase inhibitor treatments. Two agents are now approved in this situation: sorafenib and lenvatinib. Lenvatinib (Lenvima^®) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting the VEGFR1-3, FGFR 1-4, PDGFR-α, RET and c-kit. It received an FDA and EMA approval in February and March 2015 for the treatment of radioiodine refractory thyroid cancers following the SELECT study's results. In this study, patients treated with lenvatinib had a significant increase in progression-free survival (18.3 months vs. 3.6 months; HR=0.21; CI=0.14-0.31, P < 0.001) and response rate (64.8% vs. 1.5% with placebo). The median overall survival was not reached in both groups at the time of data cutoff. In France, lenvatinib was first available within a compassionate use program (ATU) and is now dispended by hospitals because not yet marketed.

[Current management of hepatocellular carcinoma]

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the major complication of chronic liver diseases and particularly of cirrhosis whatever its etiology. Once encountered mainly in the endemic countries of hepatitis B and C, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (6/100,000) is parallel to the global development of diabetes, overweight and alcohol consumption. Little progress has been made for this cancer, whose mortality is 100 % at 10 years. Liver transplantation is the only truly curative treatment (survival more than 50 % at 10 years) since it allows the eradication of hepatocellular carcinoma and its essential cause, cirrhotic liver. This is the only possible therapy when liver function is impaired. It has little impact since in the richest countries, less than 10 % of cases can be transplanted. Surgical resection and percutaneous destruction methods (uni- and multipolar radiofrequency, microwave, cryotherapy, electroporation) are the preferred treatments (survival less than 50 % at 5 years) but are only applicable for moderate tumour masses and in the absence of adjuvant therapy, are effective only in the medium term. Most patients received chemoembolization through hepatic artery, whose action is modest. Radiotherapy is widely used in Asia but almost non-existent in Western countries in this indication. Sorafenib is the only effective drug but its impact is modest. Therapies combining two modalities (embolization and radiotherapy; embolization and radiofrequency) seem promising and deserve wider testing. Screening and monitoring of cirrhosis is probably the major measure for potentially curative therapies.