Effect of Sustained Elevated Gastric pH Levels on Gefitinib Exposure

Erlotinib or Gefitinib for Treating Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protocol for a National Whole-of-Patient-Population Retrospective Cohort Study and Results of a Validation Substudy

BACKGROUND

Starting in 2010, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib were introduced into routine use in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) for treating advanced lung cancer, but their impact in this setting is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The study described in this protocol aims to understand the effectiveness and safety of these new personalized lung cancer treatments and the contributions made by concomitant medicines and other factors to adverse outcomes in the general NZ patient population. A substudy aimed to validate national electronic health databases as the data source and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying outcomes and variables.

METHODS

This study will include all NZ patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were first dispensed erlotinib or gefitinib before October 1, 2020, and followed until death or for at least 1 year. Routinely collected health administrative and clinical data will be collated from national electronic cancer registration, hospital discharge, mortality registration, and pharmaceutical dispensing databases by deterministic data linkage using National Health Index numbers. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes will be time to treatment discontinuation and serious adverse events, respectively. The primary variable will be high-risk concomitant medicines use with erlotinib or gefitinib. For the validation substudy (n=100), data from clinical records were compared to those from national electronic health databases and analyzed by agreement analysis for categorical data and by paired 2-tailed t tests for numerical data.

RESULTS

In the validation substudy, national electronic health databases and clinical records agreed in determining patient eligibility and for identifying serious adverse events, high-risk concomitant medicines use, and other categorical data with overall agreement and κ statistic of >90% and >0.8000, respectively; for example, for the determination of patient eligibility, the comparison of proxy and standard eligibility criteria applied to national electronic health databases and clinical records, respectively, showed overall agreement and κ statistic of 96% and 0.8936, respectively. Dates for estimating time to treatment discontinuation and other numerical variables and outcomes showed small differences, mostly with nonsignificant P values and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference; for example, for the dates of the first dispensing of erlotinib or gefitinib, national electronic health databases and clinical records differed on average by approximately 4 days with a nonsignificant P value of .33 and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference. As of May 2024, the main study is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol is presented for a national whole-of-patient-population retrospective cohort study designed to describe the safety and effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib during their first decade of routine use in NZ for treating EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer. The validation substudy demonstrated the feasibility and validity of using national electronic health databases and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying the study outcomes and variables proposed in the study protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000998549; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368928.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/51381.

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib is an irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Co-administration of TKIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can lead to potential drug-drug interactions, which decreases solubility and absorption of TKIs and is ultimately associated with reduced efficacy of TKIs. This retrospective analysis evaluated the effect of ARAs on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib using data obtained from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In a total of 234 patients with lazertinib pharmacokinetics observed at steady state, dose-normalized (DN) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_ss), maximum concentration (C_max,ss), and/or trough concentration on day 15 (C_D15) were compared between a group receiving ARA concomitantly for at least 4 days (ARA group) and another group not receiving ARA (non-ARA group) in a dose-proportional range. Additionally, a comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters at a therapeutic dose of 240 mg once daily was evaluated.

RESULTS

Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ARA group to non-ARA group for DNAUC_ss, DNC_max,ss, and DNC_D15 at 40 mg to 320 mg once daily showing the dose proportionality were 0.8743 (0.7285-1.0493), 0.9035 (0.7482-1.0910), and 0.9126 (0.7364-1.1311), respectively. GMRs with 90% CIs for AUC_ss, C_max,ss, and C_D15 at 240 mg were 0.9136 (0.6637-1.2576), 0.9012 (0.6703-1.2116), and 0.8850 (0.6463-1.2118), respectively.

CONCLUSION

All pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (p values > 0.05), indicating that co-administered ARAs did not significantly affect the steady state pharmacokinetics of lazertinib. Therefore, no dose adjustment of lazertinib is required in patients receiving concomitant ARAs.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT03046992, NCT04075396.

Improving Dissolution Behavior and Oral Absorption of Drugs with pH-Dependent Solubility Using pH Modifiers: A Physiologically Realistic Mass Transport Analysis

Orally dosed drugs must dissolve in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract before being absorbed through the epithelial cell membrane. In vivo drug dissolution depends on the GI tract's physiological conditions such as pH, residence time, luminal buffers, intestinal motility, and transit and drug properties under fed and fasting conditions (Paixão, P. et al. Mol. Pharm. 2018 and Bermejo, et al. M. Mol. Pharm. 2018). The dissolution of an ionizable drug may benefit from manipulating in vivo variables such as the environmental pH using pH-modifying agents incorporated into the dosage form. A successful example is the use of such agents for dissolution enhancement of BCS class IIb (high-permeability, low-solubility, and weak base) drugs under high gastric pH due to the disease conditions or by co-administration of acid-reducing agents (i.e., proton pump inhibitors, H2-antagonists, and antacids). This study provides a rational approach for selecting pH modifiers to improve monobasic and dibasic drug compounds' dissolution rate and extent under high-gastric pH dissolution conditions, since the oral absorption of BCS class II drugs can be limited by either the solubility or the dissolution rate depending on the initial dose number. Betaine chloride, fumaric acid, and tartaric acid are examples of promising pH modifiers that can be included in oral dosage forms to enhance the rate and extent of monobasic and dibasic drug formulations. However, selection of a suitable pH modifier is dependent on the drug properties (e.g., solubility and pK_a) and its interplay with the pH modifier pK_a or pK_as. As an example of this complex interaction, for basic drugs with high pK_a and intrinsic solubility values and large doses, a polyprotic pH modifier can be expected to outperform a monoacid pH modifier. We have developed a hierarchical mass transport model to predict drug dissolution of formulations under varying pH conditions including high gastric pH. This model considers the effect of physical and chemical properties of the drug and pH modifiers such as pK_a, solubility, and particle size distribution. This model also considers the impact of physiological conditions such as stomach emptying rate, stomach acid and buffer secretion, residence time in the GI tract, and aqueous luminal volume on drug dissolution. The predictions from this model are directly applicable to in vitro multi-compartment dissolution vessels and are validated by in vitro experiments in the gastrointestinal simulator. This model's predictions can serve as a potential data source to predict plasma concentrations for formulations containing pH modifiers administered under the high-gastric pH conditions. This analysis provides an improved formulation design procedure using pH modifiers by minimizing the experimental iterations under both in vitro and in vivo conditions.

Evaluation of the Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Efficacy of Dacomitinib and Gefitinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations

Introduction

Dacomitinib and gefitinib are irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR-activating mutations. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy volunteers suggested that acid-reducing drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) decreased dacomitinib and gefitinib exposure by limiting the pH-dependent absorption. This analysis retrospectively evaluates the effect of concomitant PPI use on dacomitinib exposure and on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with dacomitinib 45 mg QD or gefitinib 250 mg QD in a 1:1 randomized phase 3 study (ARCHER 1050).

Methods

The analysis grouped all patients (n = 452) treated in each arm of the study as non-PPI users, PPI users, or extensive PPI users. PFS and OS data were presented by Kaplan–Meier plots and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Dacomitinib exposure was compared using a linear mixed-effects model.

Results

Results showed that dacomitinib PFS and OS did not differ significantly when comparing PPI users (N = 59) to non-PPI users (N = 152), while extensive PPI users (N = 24) had shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.94, p = 0.011] and OS (HR: 1.77, p = 0.027) when compared to non-PPI users. For patients treated with gefitinib, PFS did not differ significantly when comparing PPI users (N = 51) and extensive PPI users (N = 19) to non-PPI users (N = 159); however, both PPI users (HR: 1.65, p = 0.007) and extensive PPI users (HR: 1.70, p = 0.050) had shorter OS when compared to non-PPI users. Further analysis by adjusting potential confounders indicated no statistically significant differences in PFS or OS between any PPI user vs. non-PPI user groups in the dacomitinib and gefitinib arms. PPI use did not appear to affect dacomitinib exposure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, PPI use in patients with NSCLC likely has minimal impact on dacomitinib or gefitinib efficacy despite decreased absorption of these drugs observed in PK studies.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01774721

Alkalescent soda beverage caused the disappearance of gefitinib-induced rashes and decreased efficacy in a non-small-cell lung cancer patient treated with gefitinib: A case report

Oral anticancer drugs have the advantages of convenient and flexible administration, however, they also face some new problems related to their oral preparation. Herein we describe a case of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patient treated with gefitinib who had long-term adverse reactions of rashes and diarrhea, and his rashes disappeared after taking alkaline soda, and then reappeared after stopping drinking it. Imaging progress was also observed. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the effect of alkaline food on gefitinib-induced rashes dynamic change. In this case, the rash acted as a signal of therapeutic efficacy. Clinicians and pharmacists should be aware of potential and common factors that affect drug efficacy and strive to achieve the best therapeutic results.

Potential proton pump inhibitor-related adverse effects

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most common medications taken by patients worldwide. PPIs are used to treat acid-related disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug/stress ulceration. For some of these diseases, long-term treatment is necessary. With such prolonged use, concern and investigation into potential adverse effects has increased. In addition, data are available regarding potential anticancer effects of PPIs, especially regarding solid tumors. The aim of this review is to assess the literature on PPIs with regard to common concerns, such as drug-drug interactions, the intestinal microbiome, dementia and central nervous system disease, and osteoporosis, as well as to highlight potential negative and positive impacts of the drug in cancer.

Comparative review of drug-drug interactions with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The development of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has revolutionized the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because these drugs are commonly used in combination with other types of medication, the risk of clinically significant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is an important consideration, especially for patients using multiple drugs for coexisting medical conditions. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential for clinically important DDIs when considering therapeutic options for individual patients. In this article, we describe the main mechanisms underlying DDIs with the EGFR-TKIs that are currently approved for the treatment of NSCLC, and, specifically, the potential for interactions mediated via effects on gastrointestinal pH, cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism, uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase, and transporter proteins. We review evidence of such DDIs with the currently approved EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, osimertinib, and icotinib) and discuss several information sources that are available online to aid clinical decision-making. We conclude by summarizing the most clinically relevant DDIs with these EFGR-TKIs and provide recommendations for managing, minimizing, or avoiding DDIs with the different agents.

Gefitinib exposure and occurrence of interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

A prospective, multicenter, large-scale cohort with a nested case–control study (NCT00252759) was conducted to identify and quantify risk factors for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who received gefitinib. This study reports the association between gefitinib exposure and the occurrence of ILD.

Methods

A total of 1891 gefitinib plasma concentrations from 336 patients were measured after first dose, at steady state, and at time of ILD occurrence. Influences of demographic and pathophysiological factors on pharmacokinetics were investigated by non-linear mixed-effect modeling. The exposure to gefitinib was compared between patients without and with ILD occurrence to explore risks associated with gefitinib-induced ILD. Intra-patient comparison of exposure was also conducted between times at ILD development and normal states.

Results

In the population pharmacokinetic analysis for gefitinib, α₁-acid glycoprotein (AGP), age, body weight, and concomitant use of cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers were significant covariates on oral clearance (CL/F). AGP and body weight were also identified as factors affecting the volume of distribution. CL/F was significantly lower at the time of ILD occurrence than normal states. Patients who developed ILD tended to show higher exposure to gefitinib than those without ILD; however, these differences were not statistically significant. On the other hand, exposure at the time of ILD occurrence was significantly elevated compared to the time of normal state within the same patients.

Conclusions

Significant elevation of exposure of gefitinib was observed at the time of ILD occurrence, suggesting reduction of CL/F could be associated with ILD-induced AGP elevation. Increase in exposure of gefitinib is unlikely to be a robust predictor of ILD and does not warrant any dose modifications.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-019-03788-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinically relevant drug interactions with multikinase inhibitors: a review

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have rapidly become an established factor in daily (hemato)-oncology practice. Although the oral route of administration offers improved flexibility and convenience for the patient, challenges arise in the use of MKIs. As MKIs are prescribed extensively, patients are at increased risk for (severe) drug–drug interactions (DDIs). As a result of these DDIs, plasma pharmacokinetics of MKIs may vary significantly, thereby leading to high interpatient variability and subsequent risk for increased toxicity or a diminished therapeutic outcome. Most clinically relevant DDIs with MKIs concern altered absorption and metabolism. The absorption of MKIs may be decreased by concomitant use of gastric acid-suppressive agents (e.g. proton pump inhibitors) as many kinase inhibitors show pH-dependent solubility. In addition, DDIs concerning drug (uptake and efflux) transporters may be of significant clinical relevance during MKI therapy. Furthermore, since many MKIs are substrates for cytochrome P450 isoenzymes (CYPs), induction or inhibition with strong CYP inhibitors or inducers may lead to significant alterations in MKI exposure. In conclusion, DDIs are of major concern during MKI therapy and need to be monitored closely in clinical practice. Based on the current knowledge and available literature, practical recommendations for management of these DDIs in clinical practice are presented in this review.

Effects of Concomitant Medication Use on Gefitinib-Induced Hepatotoxicity

Gefitinib is a drug used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Severe hepatotoxicity was observed, but only a few cases have been reported on the hepatotoxicity of gefitinib. This study aimed to investigate the association between gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity and various factors including concomitant medications in lung cancer patients. From January 2013 to December 2014, a retrospective study was performed with NSCLC patients who were treated with gefitinib. Associations between hepatotoxicity and various factors including concomitant drugs were analyzed. Based on multivariate models, it was found that H2 antagonists, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and H2 antagonists or PPIs increased hepatotoxicity by about 1.5- to 1.7-fold. Patients younger than 65 years showed 1.6 times higher hepatotoxicity than those older than 65 years. Patients with EGFR mutations had around 2-fold higher hepatotoxicity, and the percentage of incidence of hepatotoxicity because of exon 19 deletion was 32.7%. Our study showed that anti-acid-secreting agents in addition to age younger than 65 years and EGFR mutation were associated with gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Thus, close monitoring of liver function is recommended, especially for patients using anti-acid-secreting agents.

Effects of Histamine 2-receptor Antagonists and Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Pharmacokinetics of Gefitinib in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we investigated the degree of drug interactions between gefitinib and gastric acid suppressants (ie, histamine 2-receptor antagonists [H2RAs] or proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) with a clinical standard dose in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 47 patients were divided into 3 groups: gefitinib therapy with a PPI (15 patients) or an H2RA (8 patients) or gefitinib therapy alone (24 patients). On day 15 after beginning gefitinib therapy (administration at 08:00) with or without H2RA (administration twice daily at 08:00 and 18:30) or PPI (administration once daily at 08:00 or 18:30), whole blood samples were collected just prior to and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after administration.

RESULTS

The total area under the observed plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_0-24) and the maximum and trough plasma concentrations of gefitinib with the PPI were significantly lower than those without the PPI. The AUC_0-24 of gefitinib with PPI administration in either the morning or evening were significantly lower than those without PPI administration (P = .015 and .049, respectively); however, there were no significant differences in gefitinib AUC_0-24 between patients taking PPI in the morning and evening. No significant differences were observed in gefitinib exposure among the 3 CYP2C19 genotypes. The AUC_0-24 of gefitinib with H2RA tended to be lower than that without H2RA.

CONCLUSION

If the plasma concentrations of gefitinib cannot be monitored, the combination of gefitinib and PPI should be avoided, and an H2RA should also be used carefully.