Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Letermovir Coadministered With Cyclosporine A or Tacrolimus in Healthy Subjects

Drug-drug interaction between letermovir and ciclosporin in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

OBJECTIVES

Letermovir, a cytomegalovirus prophylactic agent, is widely used in allogeneic HSCT recipients. As an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), it may interact with ciclosporin A (CsA), potentially impacting its pharmacokinetics. Inflammation can impair CYP3A-mediated drug metabolism, with severe inflammation reducing CsA metabolism. However, current data on the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between CsA and letermovir as a perpetrator are limited to healthy volunteers and lack evaluation in HSCT patients, particularly under minimal inflammation conditions, where such DDIs may occur.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, single-centre study included seven adult HSCT recipients who received CsA and letermovir concurrently with no-to-mild inflammation (C-reactive protein  ≤40 mg/L). CsA concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated before and after letermovir initiation. Changes in CsA pharmacokinetics were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

A 240 mg dose of letermovir once daily significantly increased the median CsA C/D ratio from 0.39 to 0.90 (P = 0.0156) and the median CsA trough concentration from 136 µg/L to 240 µg/L (P = 0.0156). These changes were attributed to CYP3A4 inhibition by letermovir, given the stable no-to-mild inflammatory status and the lack of additional DDI.

CONCLUSION

Letermovir significantly decreased CsA metabolism in HSCT patients through CYP3A4 inhibition, with clinical implications for dosing precision. Close therapeutic drug monitoring (generally twice weekly) is therefore recommended during letermovir initiation and discontinuation to mitigate risks of subtherapeutic levels or toxicity. This study highlights the significance of assessing DDIs in HSCT, where inflammation modulates metabolic interactions resulting in a complex interplay such as a disease-drug-drug interaction (D-DDI).

The emergence of letermovir and maribavir drug-resistant mutations: from clinical trials to real-world studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with severe clinical disease and high morbidity in immunocompromised hosts. Letermovir and maribavir, are two recently developed antiviral drugs used in the prevention and treatment of resistant and refractory CMV. Following the publication of landmark randomized trials and increased use, both clinical trial data and real-world experience has reported the development of antiviral drug resistance. The aim of this review was to comprehensively review the published literature on letermovir and maribavir drug resistance and to describe the clinical scenarios in which they may emerge.

RECENT FINDINGS

For letermovir, the most frequently detected resistance mutations occur in the UL56 gene (C325Y/W/F) and confer total resistance. Maribavir resistance mutations most often occur in the UL97 gene and resistance-associated variants (RAVs) T409M, H411Y, C480F have all been detected. The clinical context in which letermovir and maribavir resistance occurs include high viral loads at initiation, intensified immunosuppression, subtherapeutic drug exposure because of poor adherence, drug interactions, and inadequate central nervous system (CNS) penetration. Emergence of resistance mutations generally occurs within the first 3 months of initiation.

SUMMARY

The detection of letermovir and maribavir resistance mutations highlights an ongoing clinical challenge in the management of CMV.

Drug-Drug Interaction Management with the Novel Anti-Cytomegalovirus Agents Letermovir and Maribavir: Guidance for Clinicians

Letermovir and maribavir have demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and treatment, respectively, of immunosuppressed patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. These patients often have polypharmacy making them at risk for drug-drug interactions. Both letermovir and maribavir can be perpetrators and victims of drug-drug interactions. Letermovir is a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A, CYP2C8 and OATP1B1/3, and a moderate inducer of CYP2C19. It is a substrate of UGT1A1/3, BCRP, P-gp and OATP1B1/3. Maribavir is a moderate CYP2C9 inhibitor and a substrate of CYP3A. Drug-drug interactions between these anti-CMV agents and a number of therapeutic classes, such as immunosuppressants, antifungal agents, and hemato-oncological agents, can have clinical consequences and deserve dose modification or close monitoring. In a number of examples, three-way drug interactions need to be assessed. The objective of this review is to provide clinicians with guidance for drug-drug interaction management, based on existing data from drug-drug interaction studies, and extrapolation to other relevant co-medications that have not (yet) been studied but that are frequently used in these patient populations.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Letermovir in Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Letermovir is a newly developed antiviral agent used for the prophylaxis of human cytomegalovirus infections in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. This novel anti-cytomegalovirus drug, used for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus reactivation until approximately 200 days after transplantation, effectively reduces the risk of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection. No human counterpart exists for the terminase complex; letermovir is virus specific and lacks some toxicities previously observed with other anti-cytomegalovirus drugs, such as cytopenia and nephrotoxicity. The absolute bioavailability of letermovir in healthy individuals is estimated to be 94% based on a population-pharmacokinetic analysis. In contrast, oral administration of letermovir to patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation results in lower exposure than that in healthy individuals. Renal or hepatic impairment does not influence the intrinsic clearance of letermovir. Co-administration of letermovir may alter the plasma concentrations of other drugs, including itself, as it acts as a substrate and inhibitor/inducer of several drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In particular, attention should be paid to the drug-drug interactions between letermovir and calcineurin inhibitors or azole antifungal agents, which are commonly used in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. This article reviews and summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of letermovir, focusing on patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation, healthy individuals, and specific patient subsets.

Effect of letermovir initiation on tacrolimus concentrations among lung transplant recipients receiving concomitant azole antifungal prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

The antiviral letermovir has been increasingly used as off-label cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. Observational studies have reported notable increases in tacrolimus (FK) exposure following letermovir; however, whether a significant interaction occurs in the setting of existing moderate-to-strong CYP3A4 inhibition is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate FK trough changes before and after letermovir among lung transplant recipients receiving azole antifungal prophylaxis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included lung transplant recipients newly initiated on letermovir between 2019-2022 following valganciclovir intolerance. Tacrolimus doses and concentrations were collected up to 30 days before and after the letermovir start date. No pre-emptive FK dose adjustments occurred prior to letermovir initiation. Patients admitted to the hospital or lacking an appropriately timed trough in the pre- or post-period were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 78 lung transplant recipients receiving FK (1.5 mg median total daily dose) and itraconazole (56.4%), isavuconazole (25.6%) or posaconazole (17.9%) prophylaxis were included. Letermovir was started at a median of 8.4 months post-transplant. The pre-/post-letermovir median FK trough was 9.6/9.0 ng/mL (p = .151), median dose-corrected trough was 4.2/4.7 ng/mL/mg (+11.9%, p = .032), and median weight-based dose-corrected trough was 362/326 [ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day] (-9.9%, p = .036). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients within their goal trough range before and after letermovir initiation (62% vs. 72%, p = .229).

CONCLUSION

Empiric FK dose adjustments do not appear warranted before letermovir initiation in lung transplant recipients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with moderate-to-strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Letermovir for cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: tips and notes for effective use in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). While conventional antiviral agents such as ganciclovir can be used for CMV prophylaxis, toxicities such as myelosuppression are a major concern.

AREA COVERED

This work aimed to summarize the latest information and practical issues regarding a new anti-CMV agent, letermovir (LET).

EXPERT OPINION

LET inhibits CMV replication by binding to components of the DNA terminase complex. A phase 3 trial in allo-HSCT recipients showed a reduced incidence of clinically significant CMV infection in the LET group. In 2017, this agent was first approved for CMV prophylaxis in adult CMV-seropositive allo-HSCT recipients in the United States, and is now used worldwide. While LET has an excellent toxicity profile, there are issues to be aware of, such as interactions with other drug classes (e.g. immunosuppressants and antifungals) and reactivation of CMV infection following LET cessation. While LET is the current standard of care for CMV prophylaxis, there are no established protocols for preemptive treatment of asymptomatic CMV viremia or for treatment of developed CMV disease. Further research is needed to maximize the benefits of LET, including the discovery of biomarkers.

Management of Cytomegalovirus Infections in the Era of the Novel Antiviral Players, Letermovir and Maribavir

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections may increase morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Until recently, standard antiviral drugs against CMV were limited to viral DNA polymerase inhibitors (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir with a risk for cross-resistance. These drugs may also cause serious side effects. This narrative review provides an update on new antiviral agents that were approved for the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Letermovir was approved in 2017 for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adults who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maribavir followed four years later, with an indication in the treatment of adult and pediatric transplant patients with refractory/resistant CMV disease. The target of letermovir is the CMV terminase complex (constituted of pUL56, pUL89 and pUL51 subunits). Letermovir prevents the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids. Maribavir is a pUL97 kinase inhibitor, which interferes with the assembly of capsids and the egress of virions from the nucleus. Both drugs have activity against most CMV strains resistant to standard drugs and exhibit favorable safety profiles. However, high-level resistance mutations may arise more rapidly in the UL56 gene under letermovir than low-grade resistance mutations. Some mutations emerging in the UL97 gene under maribavir can be cross-resistant with ganciclovir. Thus, letermovir and maribavir now extend the drug arsenal available for the management of CMV infections and their respective niches are currently defined.

Letermovir for CMV Prophylaxis in Very High-Risk Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients for Inborn Errors of Immunity

The burden of CMV infection and disease is important in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), notably in the subgroup of patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEIs). Letermovir (LMV) is now a standard of care for CMV prophylaxis in adult sero-positive (R+) recipients, but is not yet labeled for children. Published pediatric studies are still scarce. We report a monocentric real-life use of LMV in 36 HSCT pediatric recipients with IEIs considered at high-risk of CMV infection including 14 patients between 2 and 12 months of age. A homogenous dosage proportional to the body surface area was used. Pharmacokinetic (PK) was performed in 8 patients with a median of 6 years of age (range 0,6;15). The cumulative incidence of clinically significant CMV infections (CS-CMVi) and the overall survival of patients under LMV were compared to a very similar historical cohort under (val)aciclovir prophylaxis. LMV tolerance was good. As compared to the historical cohort, the incidence of CS-CMVi was significantly lower in LMV group (5 out of 36 transplants (13.9%) versus 28 of the 62 HSCT (45.2%)) (p = 0.002). Plasma LMV exposures did not significantly differ with those reported in adult patients. In this high-risk pediatric HSCT cohort transplanted for IEIs, CMV prophylaxis with LMV at a homogenous dosage was well tolerated and effective in preventing CS-CMVi compared with a historical cohort.

Letermovir and tacrolimus interaction effects in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients receiving moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors for antifungal prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Letermovir inhibits cytomegalovirus replication and is approved for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in cytomegalovirus seropositive hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Studies have found that letermovir coadministration has minimal effect on tacrolimus levels prior to the start of voriconazole, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor. However, data are lacking for hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients receiving letermovir and tacrolimus with moderate CYP 3A4 inhibitors as antifungal prophylaxis.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center analysis, we reviewed the charts of 92 consecutive adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients receiving letermovir, tacrolimus, and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors for antifungal prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were evaluated for the first 7 days pre-letermovir and for the first and second 7-day periods after letermovir. The tacrolimus mean C/D ratios [(ng/mL)/(mg/kg/day)] increased significantly with the addition of letermovir: 172.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 158.2-187.78) pre-letermovir, 268.66 (95% CI: 244.34-292.98) first-week letermovir, and 312.19 (95% CI: 279.39-344.99) second-week letermovir (P < 0.001). The average dosages (mg/kg) of tacrolimus also decreased significantly across the three-time intervals (P < 0.001). Only four patients experienced clinically significant cytomegalovirus reactivation which required systemic treatment.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a reduction in tacrolimus dosing requirements for patients receiving tacrolimus and letermovir with concomitant moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. The results of this interaction suggest that frequent monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels is warranted when starting letermovir and that empiric reduction of tacrolimus dosing upon letermovir initiation should be considered.

Belumosudil Impacts Immunosuppression Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Belumosudil (BEL) is a novel Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in patients who have failed 2 or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Although the pharmacokinetic effects of BEL on other immunosuppressive (IS) agents have not been clinically evaluated, in vitro data indicate that BEL may have possible interactions with drugs with a narrow therapeutic index used to treat cGVHD, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine, through cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and p-glycoprotein interactions. Further evaluation of these potential interactions is warranted to optimize the safety and effectiveness of these medications when combined with BEL. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of BEL on sirolimus and tacrolimus levels when used concurrently by assessing changes in IS levels after the addition of BEL. This retrospective single-center study of patients who started BEL while on tacrolimus and/or sirolimus between February 1, 2019, to February 1, 2023, included patients who had IS levels measured at baseline prior to starting BEL and at least 1 subsequent IS measurement to assess changes over time. The primary endpoint was the concentration-dose (C/D) ratio analyzed before and after the addition of BEL. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of IS levels outside of the therapeutic range (subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic) and mean dosage changes over time. Thirty-seven patients met our eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Patients taking sirolimus (n = 30) or tacrolimus (n = 16) concurrently with BEL had a statistically significant increase in the C/D ratio (sirolimus recipients, 160% [P < .001]; tacrolimus recipients, 113% [P = .013]) between the pre-BEL and final post-BEL assessments. The C/D ratios for both tacrolimus and sirolimus recipients continued to increase at several time points after initiation of BEL, indicating that multiple drug dosage adjustments may be required. After BEL initiation, 19% of tacrolimus levels and 57% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic. Despite dosage adjustments, 27% of tacrolimus levels were supratherapeutic at both the second and third assessments after starting BEL, and 28% and 30% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic at these 2 time points, respectively. All 12 of the patients who discontinued BEL during the study period (100%) showed a return to their baseline C/D ratio, confirming that the C/D ratio change can be attributed to BEL. The impact of BEL on IS levels is clinically significant, warranting dosage adjustments of concurrent medications. A significant number of patients taking sirolimus with BEL had levels >15 ng/mL during the study period, indicating a potential risk for toxicity if this interaction is unmonitored. We recommend empiric dose reductions of 25% for tacrolimus and 25% to 50% for sirolimus when adding BEL, as well as close monitoring of IS levels during the initial weeks of BEL therapy. Future studies are warranted to better describe the impact of BEL on patients taking CYP3A inhibitors.

Investigating Tacrolimus Disposition in Paediatric Patients with a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Incorporating CYP3A4 Ontogeny, Mechanistic Absorption and Red Blood Cell Binding

Tacrolimus is a crucial immunosuppressant for organ transplant patients, requiring therapeutic drug monitoring due to its variable exposure after oral intake. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling has provided insights into tacrolimus disposition in adults but has limited application in paediatrics. This study investigated age dependency in tacrolimus exposure at the levels of absorption, metabolism, and distribution. Based on the literature data, a PBPK model was developed to predict tacrolimus exposure in adults after intravenous and oral administration. This model was then extrapolated to the paediatric population, using a unique reference dataset of kidney transplant patients. Selecting adequate ontogeny profiles for hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4 appeared critical to using the model in children. The best model performance was achieved by using the Upreti ontogeny in both the liver and intestines. To mechanistically evaluate the impact of absorption on tacrolimus exposure, biorelevant in vitro solubility and dissolution data were obtained. A relatively fast and complete release of tacrolimus from its amorphous formulation was observed when mimicking adult or paediatric dissolution conditions (dose, fluid volume). In both the adult and paediatric PBPK models, the in vitro dissolution profiles could be adequately substituted by diffusion-layer-based dissolution modelling. At the level of distribution, sensitivity analysis suggested that differences in blood plasma partitioning of tacrolimus may contribute to the variability in exposure in paediatric patients.

Cytomegalovirus Disease as a Risk Factor for Invasive Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients under Targeted Antiviral and Antimycotic Prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common opportunistic infection that occurs following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In addition to the direct infection-related symptoms, it also triggers an immunological response that may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes. CMV disease has been described as a predictor of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) but its role under an antiviral prophylaxis regimen is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 214 adult liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Universal antiviral prophylaxis was utilized in recipients with CMV mismatch; intermediate- and low-risk patients received pre-emptive treatment.

RESULTS

Six percent of patients developed CMV disease independent of their serostatus. The occurrence of CMV disease was associated with elevated virus load and increased incidence of leucopenia and IFIs. Furthermore, CMV disease was associated with higher one-year mortality and increased relapse rates within the first year of OLT.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV disease causes significant morbidity and mortality in LTRs, directly affecting transplant outcomes. Due to the increased risk of IFIs, antifungal prophylaxis for CMV disease may be appropriate. Postoperative CMV monitoring should be considered after massive transfusion, even in low-risk serostatus constellations. In case of biliary complications, biliary CMV monitoring may be appropriate in the case of CMV-DNA blood-negative patients.

The Role of Coproporphyrins As Endogenous Biomarkers for Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B Inhibition-Progress from 2016 to 2023

Since the initial clinical study investigating coproporphyrins I and III (CP-I and CP-III) as endogenous biomarkers for organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) inhibition drug-drug interactions (DDIs) published in 2016, significant progress has been made in confirming the usefulness of the CPs, particularly CP-I, as biomarkers in assessing OATP functions. CP-I exhibits selectivity toward OATP1B activity in human subjects with genetic variants of OATP1B1. Its sensitivity to a broad spectrum of clinical OATP1B inhibitors has been established from weak to vigorous. Dose-dependent CP-I changes in healthy human subjects show agreement with DDI magnitudes of probe substrates by rifampin treatment. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models have been established for concentration changes of plasma CP-I with OATP inhibitors, demonstrating the usefulness of supporting the quantitative translation of the effect of CP-I levels into the DDI risk assessment of potential OATP inhibitors. As plasma CP-I's sensitivity, specificity, and selectivity have been validated in humans, monitoring CP-I levels in single and multiple clinical phase I dose escalation studies is recommended for early assessment of DDI risks and understanding the full dose-response of an investigational drug to OATP inhibitions. A decision tree is proposed to preclude the need to conduct a dedicated DDI study by administering a probe substrate drug to human subjects. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The minireview summarized the validation paths of coproporphyrins I and III (CP-I and CP-III) as biomarkers of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B (OATP1B) inhibition in humans for their selectivity, specificity, and sensitivity. The utility of monitoring CP-I to assess drug-drug interactions of OATP1B inhibition in early drug development is proposed. Changes in plasma CP-I in phase I dose range studies can be used to frame plans for late-stage development and facilitate the mechanistic understanding of complex drug-drug interactions.

Current Perspectives on the Management of Herpesvirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of human herpesvirus (HHV)-related morbidity and mortality due to the use of immunosuppressive therapy. We aim to increase awareness and understanding of HHV disease burden in SOTRs by providing an overview of current prevention and management strategies as described in the literature and guidelines. We discuss challenges in both prevention and treatment as well as future perspectives.

Cytomegalovirus in children undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to antiviral resistance

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous virus which causes a mild illness in healthy individuals. In immunocompromised individuals, such as children receiving haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CMV can reactivate, causing serious disease and increasing the risk of death. CMV can be effectively treated with antiviral drugs, but antiviral resistance is an increasingly common complication. Available therapies are associated with adverse effects such as bone marrow suppression and renal impairment, making the choice of appropriate treatment challenging. New agents are emerging and require evaluation in children to establish their role. This review will discuss established and emerging diagnostic tools and treatment options for CMV, including antiviral resistant CMV, in children undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Natural killer cell infusion for cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome following cord blood transplantation: A case report and literature review

NK cells have important functions in resisting cytomegalovirus infection, as they proliferate after viral infection and have certain immunological memory. Here, we report infusion of haploid donor-derived natural killer cells to treat two pediatric patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) who were infected with cytomegalovirus after cord blood transplantation (CBT), which successfully cleared the viral infection in both patients.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Orally Administered Letermovir Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

With balanced safety-efficacy profile, letermovir anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is used in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTR). We assessed feasibility and usefulness of letermovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in HSCTR. We performed a prospective observational study on letermovir-TDM including 40 consecutive adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic-HSCTR who received orally (PO) administered letermovir. Minimal blood concentrations of letermovir (C_trough) were measured on days 3 and 7 postletermovir initiation and weekly thereafter. Letermovir-C_trough remained stable during the first 70 days post-HSCT at a median of 286 μg/L (interquartile range, 131 to 591 μg/L), with large interpatient/intrapatient variability. No associations between breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection or detectable CMV DNAemia and letermovir-C_trough were observed. Patients with letermovir-associated adverse events had higher letermovir-C_trough than patients without (400 versus 266 μg/L, P = 0.02). Letermovir-C_trough was similar in patients with or without gastrointestinal symptoms (280 versus 300 μg/L, P = 0.49). Acute grade ≥2 GvHD was associated with higher letermovir-C_trough (479 versus 248 μg/L, P = 0.001), including gastrointestinal GvHD (499 versus 263 μg/L, P = 0.004). Concomitantly administered posaconazole and cyclosporine were associated with higher letermovir-C_trough (707 versus 259 μg/L, P < 0.001 and 437 versus 248 μg/L, P = 0.01, respectively). In multivariable analysis, both posaconazole (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 9.7; P < 0.0001) and cyclosporine-adjusted letermovir dose at 240 mg daily (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.0; P = 0.01) were independently associated with higher letermovir-C_trough. In conclusion, administration of PO letermovir led to measurable and relatively stable letermovir-C_trough, without noticeable associations with clinical efficacy. Letermovir exposure was not affected by gastrointestinal symptoms, but with posaconazole and cyclosporine administration. Associations between letermovir and concomitantly administered agents and adverse events warrant additional clinical studies.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between letermovir and tacrolimus in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Data describing the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction between letermovir and tacrolimus in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients are limited, and varying outcomes have been reported. The need for empiric dose adjustment of tacrolimus upon letermovir initiation has not been established; instead, it is suggested to closely monitor tacrolimus trough concentrations and adjust doses as needed. Further understanding of this interaction is imperative to accurately manage the narrow therapeutic window of tacrolimus post-transplant.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to determine the percent change in tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratio over the 14-day period after initiation of letermovir. Secondary objectives were to describe the frequency of tacrolimus dose adjustments after initiation of letermovir, percent change in daily tacrolimus dose over the 14-day period after initiation of letermovir, and the incidence of both sub- and supratherapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective chart review that included adult allo-HCT recipients at WVU Medicine who received tacrolimus in combination with oral letermovir and had been taking tacrolimus for at least five days prior to letermovir initiation. Patients receiving strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or intravenous tacrolimus were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the analysis. The median percent increase in tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratio over the 14-day period after initiation of letermovir was 22% (days 2 to 4), 47% (days 5 to 7), 66% (days 8 to 11), and 81% (days 12 to 14). The mean frequency of tacrolimus dose adjustments was 0.66 (days 2 to 4), 0.69 (days 5 to 7), 1.06 (days 8 to 11), and 0.57 (days 12 to 14).

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and letermovir is substantial based on results from this study and continued to affect tacrolimus concentrations over the 14-day period after letermovir initiation. Close monitoring of tacrolimus trough concentration upon initiation of letermovir should be considered.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Letermovir Following Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration in Healthy Japanese Subjects

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of letermovir were assessed in healthy Japanese subjects in 2 phase 1 trials: trial 1-single ascending oral doses (240, 480, and 720 mg) and intravenous (IV) doses (240, 480, and 960 mg), and trial 2-multiple oral doses (240 and 480 mg once daily for 7 days). Following administration of oral single and multiple doses, letermovir was absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 2 to 4 hours, and concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of ≈10 to 13 hours. The post absorption plasma concentration-time profile of letermovir following oral administration was similar to the profile observed with IV dosing. There was minimal accumulation with multiple-dose administration. Letermovir exposure in healthy Japanese subjects was ≈1.5- to 2.5-fold higher than that observed in non-Japanese subjects. Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, weight differences primarily accounted for the higher exposures observed in Asians. Letermovir was generally well tolerated following oral and IV administration to healthy Japanese subjects.

Drug-Drug Interaction of Letermovir and Atorvastatin in Healthy Participants

Letermovir (MK-8228/AIC246) is a cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA terminase complex inhibitor for CMV prophylaxis in adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. It is cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor and inhibits organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/3 and breast cancer resistance protein transporters. Atorvastatin (ATV), a commonly used treatment for hypercholesterolemia, is a substrate of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1, potentially breast cancer resistance protein, and CYP3A. As letermovir may be coadministered with ATV, the effect of multiple-dose letermovir 480 mg once daily on the pharmacokinetics of single-dose ATV 20 mg and its metabolites (ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin [o-OH-ATV] and para-hydroxyatorvastatin [p-OH-ATV]) was evaluated in an open-label trial in healthy female adults (N = 14). ATV area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum plasma concentration (C_max ) increased ≈3-fold with letermovir coadministration. The time to ATV C_max also increased, while apparent clearance decreased. The exposures of o-OH-ATV and p-OH-ATV were comparable in the presence versus absence of letermovir; however, o-OH-ATV C_max decreased by 60% with coadministration, while p-OH-ATV C_max was similar. Due to the increase in ATV exposure with letermovir coadministration, statin-associated adverse events such as myopathy should be closely monitored following coadministration. The dose of ATV should not exceed 20 mg daily when coadministered with letermovir.

Differences in kinetics of tacrolimus concentration after letermovir discontinuation by type of concomitant azole antifungal

Letermovir is commonly used for CMV prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Pharmacokinetic studies have shown an increase in tacrolimus exposure among healthy volunteers who took letermovir. However, studies in HCT recipients are needed because these patients are typically using concomitant antifungals with different degrees of CYP3A4 inhibition that may further interact with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the kinetics of tacrolimus concentration after letermovir discontinuation by type of concomitant azole antifungal in 57 HCT recipients. The median fold change in tacrolimus concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio after discontinuing letermovir was 0.64 (range 0.43-0.99) with fluconazole and 1.10 (range 0.59-1.73) with voriconazole (p < 0.001). The tacrolimus C/D ratio decreased ≥ 30% after discontinuing letermovir (p < 0.001) in 66% of patients on fluconazole and 9% on voriconazole. Among patients whose tacrolimus C/D ratio decreased ≥ 30%, three (9%) patients in the fluconazole group and one (4%) in the voriconazole group experienced worsening of GVHD. Careful monitoring of tacrolimus concentration is important after letermovir discontinuation to avoid worsening of GVHD due to decreased tacrolimus concentration.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Letermovir and Midazolam Coadministration in Healthy Subjects

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. In vitro studies have identified letermovir as a potential cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor. Thus, the effect of letermovir on the CYP3A isoenzyme-specific probe drug midazolam was investigated in a phase 1 trial. Healthy female subjects received single-dose intravenous (IV; 1 mg) and oral (2 mg) midazolam on days -4 and -2, respectively. Letermovir 240 mg once daily was administered on days 1 to 6, and further single doses of midazolam 1 mg IV and oral midazolam 2 mg were administered on days 4 and 6, respectively. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety were monitored throughout the trial. Following coadministration with letermovir, the least square means ratio for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration was 172.4% and 225.3%, respectively, for oral midazolam, and 105.2% and 146.6%, respectively, for midazolam IV. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration ratio of midazolam to 1-hydroxymidazolam increased slightly in the presence of letermovir following IV (8.8-13.1; 49% increase) and oral (3.3-5.3; 59% increase) midazolam. Letermovir reached steady state, on average, by days 5 to 6. All treatments were generally well tolerated. Letermovir demonstrated moderate CYP3A inhibition.

Exposure-Response Analyses of Letermovir Following Oral and Intravenous Administration in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients

The cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral terminase inhibitor letermovir is approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. In a phase III trial (NCT02137772), letermovir significantly reduced clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) rate vs. placebo through Week 24 (primary end point) and Week 14 (secondary end point) post transplantation. Here, exposure-response relationships were investigated using efficacy and selected safety end points from the phase III trial to inform the proposed clinical dose. Post hoc exposure estimates were derived from a population pharmacokinetic model. No significant exposure dependencies were found for CS-CMVi through Week 24 or Week 14 among letermovir-treated participants. Evaluated covariates had no impact on exposure-efficacy relationships and letermovir plasma exposure did not affect time of CS-CMVi onset. There was no dependence between adverse event incidence and letermovir exposure. These results support current dosing recommendations in several countries and regions, including the United States and European Union.

American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series: #3-Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious diseases guidelines for the care of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. A new approach was taken with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious disease series as a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQ), tables, and figures. Adult and pediatric infectious disease and HCT content experts developed and answered FAQs. Topics were finalized with harmonized recommendations that were made by assigning an A through E strength of recommendation paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I through III. The third topic in the series focuses on the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in HCT recipients by reviewing prophylaxis and preemptive therapy approaches; key definitions, relevant risk factors, and diagnostic monitoring considerations are also reviewed.

Development and Full Validation of a Bioanalytical Method for Quantifying Letermovir in Human Plasma Using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry

With the aim of studying the pharmacokinetics of letermovir, which is a newly developed antiviral agent for human cytomegalovirus, a rapid and simple ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC/MS) method was developed and validated for the quantification of letermovir in human plasma. Separation was performed in reverse phase mode using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (130 Å, 1.7 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, 10 mM ammonium acetate-0.1% formic acid solution as mobile phase A, and acetonitrile as mobile phase B with a gradient elution. The method was validated over a linear range of 10-1000 ng/mL with a coefficient of determination (R²) >0.99 using weighted linear regression analysis. The intra- and inter-assay accuracy (nominal%) and precision (relative standard deviation%) were within ±15 and ≤15%, respectively. The specificity, recovery, matrix effect, stability, and dilution integrity of this method were also within acceptable limits. This method could be useful in studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as performing the therapeutic drug monitoring of letermovir.

Letermovir and Maribavir for the Treatment and Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ and Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Until recently, available drugs for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention and treatment in transplant patients included (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. Use of these drugs is limited by toxicity and the development of resistance. The 2017 approval of letermovir for prevention of CMV after stem cell transplant marked the first approval of an anti-CMV agent since 2003. The role of letermovir in treatment of established CMV infection or disease remains largely unstudied, although early reports suggest that a low barrier to resistance will likely limit efficacy as primary therapy for patients with refractory or resistant disease. The investigational agent maribavir has shown promise as preemptive treatment; in patients with refractory or resistant disease the emergence of resistance while on treatment has been observed and ongoing studies will define efficacy in this population. Both agents have unique mechanisms of action limiting cross resistance, and neither exhibit myelotoxicity or nephrotoxicity.

Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Patients with Valganciclovir-Induced Leukopenia

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with valganciclovir is the standard of practice in most transplant centers, but treatment-related leukopenia can limit valganciclovir’s use. Therefore, we evaluated letermovir, a novel antiviral agent recently approved for use in hematopoietic cell transplant patients as CMV prophylaxis, in lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate valganciclovir due to severe leukopenia. We performed a retrospective analysis of all lung transplant patients at our center who received letermovir for CMV prophylaxis between 1 December 2018 and 1 January 2020. A repeated measures mixed model was used to analyze white blood cell (WBC) trends, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze secondary endpoints, including CMV DNAemia, renal function, immunosuppression dosing, and allograft function. Seventeen patients were administered letermovir during the study period due to valganciclovir-induced leukopenia (median WBC nadir 1.1 K/uL, range <0.30–2.19 K/uL). Median WBC improvement was noted in 15 (88.2%) patients after starting letermovir. Breakthrough CMV DNAemia necessitating treatment occurred in two patients, with one of the two cases being due to patient noncompliance. CMV resistance to letermovir was detected in two patients, necessitating a change to an alternative agent in one of these patients. No major side effects were reported in any patient. Letermovir is a generally safe and effective alternative for CMV prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate valganciclovir due to leukopenia.

Cytomegalovirus antiviral stewardship in the COVID-19 Era: Increasing complexity of prophylaxis and treatment and potential mitigation strategies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common and significant complications after solid organ transplant (SOT). Severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), which causes the novel betacoronavirus 2019 disease (COVID‐19), has become the first global pandemic in 100 years. The world's attention has turned to address this unanticipated development; however, the viral infection that has long plagued outcomes after solid organ transplantation still requires vigilance. With physical distancing as the key intervention to reduce the healthcare burden, and the unease related to healthcare contact within the transplant population given the associated morbidity and mortality of COVID‐19 in transplant recipients, providers have struggled to evaluate and streamline essential in‐person healthcare contact, including laboratory visits. Owing to this, the COVID‐19 pandemic has placed a significant strain on the delivery of CMV prophylaxis and treatment after solid organ transplantation. In this piece, we will describe issues our CMV antiviral stewardship service has encountered in the care of the transplant recipient with CMV during the this unprecedented time and share our expert opinion to approaches to providing optimal, evidenced based care during a pandemic associated with a seemingly unrelated viral infection.

Advances in the Development of Therapeutics for Cytomegalovirus Infections

The development of therapeutics for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, while progressing, has not matched the pace of new treatments of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections; nevertheless, recent developments in the treatment of CMV infections have resulted in improved human health and perhaps will encourage the development of new therapeutic approaches. First, the deployment of ganciclovir and valganciclovir for both the prevention and treatment of CMV infections and disease in transplant recipients has been further improved with the licensure of the efficacious and less toxic letermovir. Regardless, late-onset CMV disease, specifically pneumonia, remains problematic. Second, the treatment of congenital CMV infections with valganciclovir has beneficially improved both hearing and neurologic outcomes, both fundamental advances for these children. In these pediatric studies, viral load was decreased but not eliminated. Thus, an important lesson learned from studies in both populations is the need for new antiviral agents and the necessity for combination therapies as has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of HIV infections, among others. The development of monoclonal antibodies, sirtuins, and cyclopropovir may provide new treatment options.

Population pharmacokinetics of letermovir following oral and intravenous administration in healthy participants and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

Letermovir is indicated for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Two‐stage population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling of letermovir was conducted to support dose rationale and evaluate the impact of intrinsic/extrinsic factors. Data from healthy phase I study participants over a wide dose range were modeled to evaluate the effects of selected intrinsic factors, including pharmacogenomics; next, phase III HSCT‐recipient data at steady‐state following clinical doses were modeled. The model in HSCT recipients adequately described letermovir PK following both oral or i.v. administration, and was consistent with the healthy participant model at steady‐state clinical doses. Intrinsic factor effects were not clinically meaningful. These staged analyses indicate that letermovir PK in HSCT recipients and healthy participants differ only with respect to bioavailability and absorption rate. The HSCT recipient model was suitable for predicting exposure for exposure–response analysis supporting final dose selection.

How I treat CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains one of the most common and life-threatening infectious complications following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, despite novel diagnostic technologies, several novel prophylactic agents, and further improvements in preemptive therapy and treatment of established CMV disease. Treatment decisions for CMV reactivation are becoming increasingly difficult and must take into account whether the patient has received antiviral prophylaxis, the patient's individual risk profile for CMV disease, CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution, CMV viral load, and the potential drug resistance detected at the time of initiation of antiviral therapy. Thus, we increasingly use personalized treatment strategies for the recipient of an allograft with CMV reactivation based on prior use of anti-CMV prophylaxis, viral load, the assessment of CMV-specific T-cell immunity, and the molecular assessment of resistance to antiviral drugs.

Cell therapy for cytomegalovirus infection

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is widely prevalent but mostly harmless in immunocompetent individuals. In the post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) setting unrestricted viral replication can cause end-organ damage (CMV disease) and, in a small proportion, mortality. Current management strategies are based on sensitive surveillance programmes, with the more recent introduction of an effective prophylactic antiviral drug, letermovir, but all aim to bridge patients until reconstitution of endogenous immunity is sufficient to constrain viral replication.

AREAS COVERED

Over the past 25 years, the adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T-cells has developed from the first proof of concept transfer of CD 8 + T-cell clones, to the development of 'off the shelf' third party derived Viral-Specific T-cells (VSTs). In this review, we cover the current management of CMV, and discuss the developments in CMV adoptive cellular therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the adoption of letermovir as a prophylaxis in standard therapy, the incidence of CMV reactivation is likely to decrease, and any widely adopted cellular therapy needs to be economically competitive. Current clinical trials will help to identify the patients most likely to gain the maximum benefit from any form of cell therapy.

Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Emergence of letermovir resistance in solid organ transplant recipients with ganciclovir resistant cytomegalovirus infection: A case series and review of the literature

Ganciclovir (GCV)-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common problem among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients without prior CMV immunity (CMV D+/R-). GCV-resistant CMV represents a particular challenge for CMV management. Letermovir is a recently licensed antiviral agent for primary CMV prophylaxis in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Given the favorable safety profile and its oral bioavailability letermovir may be considered a valuable off-label option for secondary prophylaxis of GCV-resistant CMV in SOT recipients. Here, we describe our experience with letermovir as secondary prophylaxis for GCV-resistant CMV in two renal transplant recipients and review the literature in regard of previously published cases. Letermovir resistance emerged after a few months of secondary prophylaxis in the two renal transplant recipients. In both cases, the previously described UL56 C325Y letermovir resistance mutation was detected. In vitro studies of letermovir suggest a relatively low genetic barrier to resistance. Therefore, caution is warranted when using letermovir as secondary prophylaxis for GCV-resistant CMV infection.

Quantification of letermovir in human serum using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection

A simple, rapid, cost-effective and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method with diode array detection was developed and validated for the quantification of letermovir, a compound approved for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in adult recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Sorafenib was used as internal standard. Samples were pre-treated by liquid-liquid extraction with tert-butyl methylether. Separation was achieved on a XTerra® RP18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm) at 30 °C using gradient elution with a mobile phase of 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 7.9 (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile:20 mM ammonium bicarbonate (9:1 v/v) (mobile phase B). Samples were eluted at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min throughout the 20-min run. UV wavelength mode was used, letermovir and sorafenib were monitored at 260 nm. The calibration curve was linear in a concentration range of 25-5000 ng/mL with correlation coefficients ≥ 0.99. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy expressed as relative error were -11.4-20% and -7.96-10.62%, respectively. Precision expressed as coefficient of variation was 1.44-3.15% (intra-day) and 1.17-1.93% (inter-day). The method was successfully applied for analysis of 128 letermovir levels demonstrating its usefulness for letermovir monitoring in routine clinical practice.

Intrapatient variability in concentration/dose ratio of tacrolimus predicts transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy

Tacrolimus (TAC) is essential for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We have sometimes observed large fluctuations in TAC concentration. However, links between the variability in the concentration or the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio of TAC and clinical complications remain ambiguous. To clarify relationships between various parameters of TAC and early complications such as pre-engraftment immune reactions/engraftment syndrome, aGVHD, and transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA), a total of 146 patients who underwent allo-HSCT were included. Intrapatient variabilities in the concentration and C/D ratio of TAC were estimated by intrapatient mean absolute deviation (iMAD). The mean concentration and C/D ratio of TAC were not significantly different between with and without complications. A strong association was observed between greater iMAD for TAC C/D ratio from days 15 to 21 and the development of TA-TMA. iMAD values for TAC C/D ratio of 11.4 or greater was a risk factor for TA-TMA and the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was significantly higher in patients with iMAD values for TAC C/D ratio of 11.4 or greater. Intrapatient variability in the C/D ratio of TAC was associated with the incidence of TA-TMA and NRM and might be useful for predicting TA-TMA.

DNA Encapsidation and Capsid Assembly Are Underexploited Antiviral Targets for the Treatment of Herpesviruses

Although there are effective nucleoside analogs to treat HSV, VZV, and HCMV disease, herpesvirus infections continue to contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Acyclovir is the drug of choice for HSV encephalopathy, yet there is an estimated 6-19% mortality rate with half of the survivors experiencing moderate to severe chronic neurological deficits. For VZV, current treatments are inadequate to prevent acute and persistent pain due to zoster. Treatment of HCMV with GCV requires close monitoring particularly in patients with impaired renal function and there are no approved treatments for congenital HCMV infections. New therapeutic options to control cytomegalovirus reactivation in bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients are needed to improve patient outcome. No successful chemotherapeutic options are available for EBV, HHV-6, 7, and 8. Drug resistance is a concern for HCMV, HSV, and VZV since approved drugs share common mechanisms of action. Targeting DNA encapsidation or capsid assembly provide additional options for the development of non-nucleoside, small molecule anti-herpesviral drugs.

Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Letermovir and Fluconazole in Healthy Participants

Letermovir is a prophylactic agent for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in adult cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. As the antifungal agent fluconazole is administered frequently in transplant recipients, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted between oral letermovir and oral fluconazole. A phase 1 open-label, fixed-sequence study was performed in healthy females (N = 14, 19-55 years). In Period 1, a single dose of fluconazole 400 mg was administered. Following a 14-day washout, a single dose of letermovir 480 mg was administered (Period 2), and after a 7-day washout, single doses of fluconazole 400 mg and letermovir 480 mg were coadministered in Period 3. Pharmacokinetics and safety were evaluated. The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole and letermovir were not meaningfully changed following coadministration. Fluconazole geometric mean ratio (GMR; 90% confidence interval [CI]) with letermovir for area under the concentration-versus-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_0-∞ ) was 1.03 (0.99-1.08); maximum concentration (C_max ) was 0.95 (0.92-0.99). Letermovir AUC_0-∞ GMR (90%CI) was 1.11 (1.01-1.23), and C_max was 1.06 (0.93-1.21) following coadministration with fluconazole. Coadministration of fluconazole and letermovir was generally well tolerated.

Letermovir and its role in the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most common infections affecting allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Although available anti-CMV therapies have been evaluated for the prevention of CMV reactivation, their toxicity profile makes them unfavorable for use as primary prophylaxis; thus, they are routinely reserved for the treatment of CMV viremia or CMV end-organ disease. Pre-emptive CMV monitoring strategies have been widely accepted, and although they have been helpful in early detection, they have not affected the overall morbidity and mortality associated with CMV. Letermovir is a novel agent that was approved for primary prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. This review focuses on letermovir's novel mechanism; clinical trials supporting its United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and subsequent follow-up analyses; clinical considerations, with an emphasis on pharmacology; and lessons learned from solid organ transplant recipients, as well as potential future directions.

Target verification of artesunate-related antiviral drugs: Assessing the role of mitochondrial and regulatory proteins by click chemistry and fluorescence labeling

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is associated with serious pathology such as transplant rejection or embryonic developmental defects. Antiviral treatment with currently available drugs targeting viral enzymes is often accompanied with severe side effects and the occurrence of drug-resistant viruses. For this reason, novel ways of anti-HCMV therapy focusing on so far unexploited small molecules, targets and mechanisms are intensively studied. Recently, we described the pronounced antiviral activity of the artesunate-related class of trioxane compounds, comprising NF-κB/signaling inhibitors like the trimeric derivative TF27, which proved to be highly active in a nanomolar range both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we extend this analysis by presenting further TF27/artesunate-derived antiviral compounds designed for their specific use in target verification by click chemistry applied in fluorescence labeling and tag affinity strategies. Our main findings are as follows: (i) compounds TF27, BG95, AC98 and AC173 exert strong inhibitory activity against HCMV replication in cultured primary human cells, (ii) autofluorescence activity could be quantitatively detected for BG95 and AC98, and confocal fluorescence imaging revealed accumulation in mitochondria, (iii) postulated cellular targets including mitochondrial proteins were down-regulated upon TF27 treatment, (iv) a click chemistry-based protocol of target enrichment was established, and (v) mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis, using proteins from HCMV-infected fibroblasts covalently interacting with AC173, revealed a refined list of targets. Combined, data strongly suggest a complex mode of antiviral drug-target interaction of artesunate-related compounds, now highlighting potential roles of mitochondrial, NF-κB pathway proteins, exportins and possibly more. This strategy may further promote antiviral drug development on the basis of pharmacologically optimized trioxane derivatives.

Suppression of CMV Infection with Letermovir in a Kidney Transplant Patient

Infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) with resistance to ganciclovir (GCV) is a therapeutic challenge in kidney transplant patients, because standard treatment options are nephrotoxic. We report the case of a kidney transplant recipient with GCV-resistant CMV disease, in whom letermovir, a novel inhibitor of CMV packaging, was administered off-label and prevented a relapse of disease once the CMV load was decreased by cidofovir. Furthermore, we observed significant drug interactions between letermovir and tacrolimus.

LEARNING POINTS

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease with resistance to ganciclovir (GCV) is difficult to manage in transplant patients.Letermovir may become a new option for treatment and prophylaxis of GCV-resistant CMV infection, but assessment of treatment response is difficult.Letermovir may lead to drug interactions via CYP3A4.

Moving Past Ganciclovir and Foscarnet: Advances in CMV Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors such as ganciclovir and foscarnet have dramatically reduced the burden of CMV infection in the HCT recipient. However, their use is often limited by toxicities and resistance. Agents with novel mechanisms and favorable toxicity profiles are critically needed. We review recent developments in CMV antivirals and immune-based approaches to mitigating CMV infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Letermovir, an inhibitor of the CMV terminase complex, was approved in 2017 for primary CMV prophylaxis in adult seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients. Maribavir, an inhibitor of the CMV UL97 kinase, is currently in two phase 3 treatment studies. Adoptive immunotherapy using third-party T cells has proven safe and effective in preliminary studies. Vaccine development continues, with several promising candidates currently under study. No longer limited to DNA polymerase inhibitors, the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in the HCT recipient is a rapidly evolving field which should translate into improvements in CMV-related outcomes.

Tacrolimus Concentration after Letermovir Initiation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients Receiving Voriconazole: A Retrospective, Observational Study

Letermovir (LMV) is a new antiviral drug used to prevent cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. It has been reported to increase tacrolimus (TAC) exposure and decrease voriconazole (VRCZ) exposure in healthy participants. However, VRCZ inhibits the metabolism of TAC. Thus, the effects of LMV on TAC exposure in patients receiving VRCZ are unknown. This retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted between May 2018 and April 2019. The TAC concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, VRCZ concentration, and VRCZ C/D ratio for 7 days before and for the first and second 7-day periods after the initiation of LMV administration were evaluated. Fourteen HSCT recipients receiving VRCZ were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the TAC C/D ratio for 7 days before and for the first and second 7-day periods after initiating LMV administration (median: 866 [IQR: 653-953], 842 [IQR: 636-1031], and 906 [IQR: 824-1210] [ng/mL]/[mg/kg], respectively). In contrast, the VRCZ C/D ratio and concentration for the first and second 7-day periods after LMV initiation were significantly lower than those before initiating LMV administration (mean 1.11 ± 0.07, 0.12 ± 0.08, and 0.22 ± 0.12 [μg/mL]/[mg/kg] and 0.7 ± 0.5, 0.8 ± 0.5, and 1.3 ± 0.7 μg/mL, respectively; n = 12). This can be explained by the increase in TAC concentration caused by CYP3A4 inhibition due to LMV and by the decrease in TAC concentration ascribed to the decrease in VRCZ concentration by CYP2C19 induction due to LMV. These results suggest that it is unnecessary to adjust the dose of TAC based on LMV initiation; however, it is necessary to adjust the dose of TAC based on conventional TAC concentration measurements.

CMV Prevention and Treatment in Transplantation: What's New in 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transplant recipients are at risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and associated morbidity and mortality. We summarize recently introduced or currently investigated modalities for prevention and treatment of CMV infection in hematopoietic cell (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Letermovir was recently approved for CMV prevention in HCT recipients. Data from real world studies support its role to improve outcomes in this population. Letermovir is currently under investigation for broader patient populations and indications. Maribavir is in late stages of development for CMV treatment and may provide a safer alternative to currently available anti-CMV drugs. Promising CMV vaccine candidates and adoptive cell therapy approaches are under evaluation. CMV immune monitoring assays are predicted to play a more central role in our clinical decision making. In recent years, major advances have been made in CMV prevention and treatment in transplant recipients. Rigorous research is ongoing and is anticipated to further impact our ability to improve outcomes in this population.

Safety considerations with current and emerging antiviral therapies for cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality, and its management is essential for the successful outcome of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Areas covered: This review discusses the safety profiles of currently available and emerging antiviral drugs and the other strategies for HCMV prevention and treatment after transplantation. Expert opinion: Strategies for management of HCMV rely largely on the use of antiviral agents that inhibit viral DNA polymerase (ganciclovir/valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir/brincidofovir) and viral terminase complex (letermovir), with different types and degrees of adverse effects. An investigational agent, maribavir, exerts its anti-CMV effect through UL97 inhibition, and its safety profile is under clinical evaluation. In choosing the antiviral medication to use, it is important to consider these safety profiles in addition to overall efficacy. In addition to antiviral drugs, reduction of immunosuppression is often generally needed in the management of HCMV infection, but with a potential risk of allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. The use of HCMV-specific or non-specific intravenous immunoglobulins remains debated, while adoptive HCMV-specific T cell therapy remains investigational, and associated with unique set of adverse effects.