Pain persistence and lethality of suicide attempts

Pain tolerance and threshold in suicide attempters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

It has been hypothesized that individuals less sensitive to pain could be at higher risk of suicide. However, data on pain sensitivity in suicide attempters (SA) obtained using experimental procedures are heterogeneous. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate and compare pain tolerance and threshold in SA (patients with lifetime history of suicide attempt), non-attempters (psychiatric controls, PC), and healthy controls (HC). A random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the standardized mean differences using data from 16 studies that compared physical pain tolerance and threshold in SA and PC or HC. Pain tolerance and threshold were not significantly different in SA and PC. However, pain tolerance, but not threshold, was higher in SA than HC. Our findings do not support the hypothesis of an altered pain perception related as a trait for suicidal vulnerability, but rather suggest altered pain perception related to psychiatric vulnerability.

Sensitivity to ostracism is blunted in suicide attempters only when they report suicidal ideation

BACKGROUND

Modified pain perception is at the core of many theories on suicide; however, studies on the relationship between pain perception and suicidal behavior (attempt) have produced contradictory results. In this experimental study, we investigated whether physical pain and social pain are concomitantly influenced by suicidal ideation (SI) and past suicidal behavior.

METHODS

155 inpatients with depression (90 with and 65 without past history of suicide attempt) were included. They underwent thermal stimulation of the skin to assess physical pain tolerance and played the Cyberball game to assess their sensitivity to ostracism (social pain). Participants self-assessed current SI through the specific item in the Beck Depression Inventory.

RESULTS

Pain tolerance was not associated with history of suicide attempt, current SI, and their interaction. Social pain was associated with the interaction between history of suicide attempt and current SI. Social pain was decreased in suicide attempters, compared with non-attempters, only when they reported current SI.

LIMITATIONS

Cyberball game may not be representative of everyday stress and ecological social context.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike what suggested by many theories, pain tolerance does not seem to be necessary to attempt suicide. Suicide attempters with current SI displayed blunted sensitivity to ostracism and could be less willing to restore social affiliation compared with non-attempters.

Suicidal behavior in the social environment: Does exposure moderate the relationship between an individual's own suicidal ideation and behavior?

INTRODUCTION

Suicidal behavior still cannot be sufficiently predicted. Exposure to suicidal behavior in the personal social environment is assumed to moderate the individual's transition from suicidal ideation to suicidal behavior within the Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behavior (IMV-model). This study aimed to investigate this moderating effect in a German high-risk sample.

METHODS

We interviewed 308 psychiatric inpatients (53% female) aged 18 to 81 years (M = 36.9, SD = 14.30) admitted after attempted suicide (53%) or due to an acute suicidal crisis (47%) regarding exposure events in their social environment. Four types of exposure events were analyzed using moderation analyses: familial suicides/suicide attempts, non-familial suicides/suicide attempts. Additionally, the numbers of reported exposure events were compared between patients with and without a recent suicide attempt as well as between patients with lifetime suicide attempts and lifetime suicidal ideation.

RESULTS

Neither moderating effects of exposure events on the relationship between lifetime suicidal ideation and recent suicidal behavior nor group differences between suicidal ideators and suicide attempters regarding the exposure events were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure events might have differential and possibly protective effects on suicidal behavior - depending on type and quality (intensity, personal relevance, and recency) of event - and on the outcome (suicide vs. suicide attempt).

Testing the Four Main Predictions of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior in an Inpatient Sample Admitted Due to Severe Suicidality

This study aimed to evaluate four main predictions of the Interpersonal Psychological Theory of Suicide (IPTS): the importance of perceived burdensomeness (PB), thwarted belongingness (TB), hopelessness (H), and capability for suicide (CS) for (passive/active) suicide ideation, suicide intent and suicide attempts. N = 308 psychiatric inpatients admitted due to severe suicidality (53.6% female: n = 165; age: M = 36.82, SD = 14.30, range: 18-81) completed self-report measures of TB, PB, H, CS and suicide ideation as well as interviews on suicide intent and suicide attempts. TB and PB were associated with (passive/active) suicidal ideation, whereas the three-way interaction PB, TB, and H was not associated with active suicide ideation. Fearlessness about death in conjunction with active suicidal ideation was not associated with suicide intent and the interaction of PB, TB, and CS was neither predictive of recent suicide attempt status nor lifetime number of suicide attempts. Given the cross-sectional nature of the data, conclusions on causality should be handled carefully. The results challenge the theoretical validity of the IPTS and its clinical utility-at least within the methodological limitations of the current study. Yet, findings underscore the importance of PB in understanding suicidality.

From decision to action: Suicidal history and time between decision to die and actual suicide attempt

A substantial proportion of suicide attempts seem to be realized in a sudden manner. However, it is unclear how suicide attempters showing a rapid transition from the decision to die to acting differ from suicide attempters showing a slower transition regarding their suicidal history. The main aim of this study was to determine the proportion of suicide attempters, who reported a rapid transition (≤5, ≤10, ≤180 min) between their decision to die and their actual attempt. Furthermore, attempter groups (≤ vs. >5, ≤ vs. >10 and ≤ vs. >180 min) were compared regarding suicidal history (ideation, plans, and number of lifetime as well as 12 month suicide attempts) as well as depression, hopelessness and trait impulsivity. In total, 118 inpatients (62.7% female; age: M = 38.71, SD = 14.71) hospitalized due to a recent suicide attempt were assessed using structured clinical interview measures assessing suicidal history and self-report instruments. Thirty-six percent reported a time period of ≤5 min, 44% a time period of ≤10 min and 73% a time period of ≤180 min between their decision to die and their attempt. Participants with a rapid transition (≤5, ≤10, ≤180 min) did not differ from participants with a slower transition (>5, >10, >180 min) regarding suicidal history, depression, hopelessness and trait impulsivity. Taken together, a rapid transition seems common, but nevertheless, rapidly realized suicide attempts cannot necessarily be characterized as impulsive.

Validation of the German capability for suicide questionnaire (GCSQ) in a high-risk sample of suicidal inpatients

BACKGROUND

The German Capability for Suicide Questionnaire (GCSQ) was developed to measure fearlessness of death and pain tolerance - two constructs central to the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide. Initial scale development, definition of the factor structure and confirmation of the two-dimensional factor structure was performed in samples suffering from relatively low levels of suicide ideation/behavior. The present study aimed to validate the German Capability for Suicide Questionnaire (GCSQ) in a high-risk sample of suicidal inpatients.

METHODS

Factor structure, reliability and validity were investigated in a sample of inpatients (N = 296; 53.0% female; age in years: M = 36.81, SD = 14.27) admitted to a hospital due to a recent suicide attempt or an acute suicidal crisis (in immediate need of inpatient treatment). To establish convergent validity, interview-based assessments of lifetime suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury as well as questionnaire-based assessments of painful and provocative events were used. Finally, stability of GCSQ-scores over a follow-up period of 12 months was assessed.

RESULTS

Results indicated good psychometric properties, and provided additional evidence for construct validity and stability of the subscales over a one-year period, and demonstrated adequate fit of the data with respect to the original factor structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that the GCSQ is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of capability for suicide that can be used in clinic assessment and research.