Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Optimal Dosage Prediction of Quinine Coadministered With Ritonavir-Boosted Lopinavir

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Investigate the Disease-Drug-Drug Interactions between Voriconazole and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in COVID-19 Patients with CYP2C19 Phenotypes

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary aspergillosis superinfection with cytokine storm is associated with increased mortality. This study aimed to establish a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PK) model to investigate the disease-drug-drug interactions between voriconazole and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients with COVID-19 with elevated interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels carrying various CYP2C19 phenotypes. The model was constructed and validated using PK data on voriconazole, ritonavir, and IL-6, and was subsequently verified against clinical data from 78 patients with COVID-19. As a result, the model predicted voriconazole, ritonavir, and IL-6 PK parameters and drug-drug interaction-related fold changes in healthy subjects and patients with COVID-19 with acceptable prediction error, demonstrating its predictive capability. Simulations indicated ritonavir could increase voriconazole exposure to CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizers rather than decrease it, in contrast to what is indicated in the drug package insert. However, the predicted ritonavir exposures were comparable across subjects. In patients with COVID-19, both ritonavir and IL-6 increased voriconazole trough concentrations, which may lead to CYP2C19 phenotype-dependent overexposure. In conclusion, COVID-19-induced IL-6 elevation and ritonavir increased voriconazole exposure, and the magnitude of interactions was influenced by CYP2C19 phenotype. Thus, caution is warranted when prescribing voriconazole concomitantly with Paxlovid in patients with COVID-19.

Prediction of drug-drug interactions between roflumilast and CYP3A4/1A2 perpetrators using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approach

This study aimed to develop a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict changes in the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD, PDE4 inhibition) of roflumilast (ROF) and ROF N-oxide when co-administered with eight CYP3A4/1A2 perpetrators. The population PBPK model of ROF and ROF N-oxide has been successfully developed and validated based on the four clinical PK studies and five clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) studies. In PK simulations, every ratio of prediction to observation for PK parameters fell within the range 0.7 to 1.5. In DDI simulations, except for tow peak concentration ratios (Cmax) of ROF with rifampicin (prediction: 0.63 vs. observation: 0.19) and with cimetidine (prediction: 1.07 vs. observation: 1.85), the remaining predicted ratios closely matched the observed ratios. Additionally, the PBPK model suggested that co-administration with the three perpetrators (cimetidine, enoxacin, and fluconazole) may use with caution, with CYP3A4 strong inhibitor (ketoconazole and itraconazole) or with dual CYP3A41A2 inhibitor (fluvoxamine) may reduce to half-dosage or use with caution, while co-administration with CYP3A4 strong or moderate inducer (rifampicin, efavirenz) should avoid. Overall, the present PBPK model can provide recommendations for adjusting dosing regimens in the presence of DDIs.

Chronic kidney disease and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: a critical review of existing models

INTRODUCTION

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a paradigm shift in this era for determining the exposure of drugs in pediatrics, geriatrics, and patients with chronic diseases where clinical trials are difficult to conduct.

AREAS COVERED

This review has collated data regarding published PBPK models on chronic kidney disease (CKD), including the drug and system-specific input model parameters and model evaluation criteria. Four databases were used from 13th June 2023 to 10th July 2023 for identifying the relevant studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Alterations in plasma protein (albumin/alpha-1 acid glycoprotein), gastric emptying time, hematocrit, small intestinal transit time, the abundance of cytochrome (CYP) 450 enzymes, glomerular filtration rate, and physicochemical parameters for different drugs were explicitly elaborated from earlier reported studies. Moreover, model evaluation depicted that models in CKD for most of the included drugs were within the allowed two-fold error range.

EXPERT OPINION

This review will provide insights for researchers on applying PBPK models in managing patients with different levels of CKD to prevent undesirable side effects and increase the effectiveness of drug therapy.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling for optimal dosage prediction of olaparib when co-administered with CYP3A4 modulators and in patients with hepatic/renal impairment

This study aimed to develop a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and trough concentration (Ctrough) at steady-state of olaparib (OLA) in Caucasian, Japanese and Chinese. Furthermore, the PBPK model was combined with mean and 95% confidence interval to predict optimal dosing regimens of OLA when co-administered with CYP3A4 modulators and administered to patients with hepatic/renal impairment. The dosing regimens were determined based on safety and efficacy PK threshold Cmax (< 12,500 ng/mL) and Ctrough (772-2500 ng/mL). The population PBPK model for OLA was successfully developed and validated, demonstrating good consistency with clinically observed data. The ratios of predicted to observed values for Cmax and Ctrough fell within the range of 0.5 to 2.0. When OLA was co-administered with a strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, the recommended dosing regimens should be reduced to 100 mg BID and 150 mg BID, respectively. Additionally, the PBPK model also suggested that OLA could be not recommended with a strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducer. For patients with moderate hepatic and renal impairment, the dosing regimens of OLA were recommended to be reduced to 200 mg BID and 150 mg BID, respectively. In cases of severe hepatic and renal impairment, the PBPK model suggested a dosing regimen of 100 mg BID for OLA. Overall, this present PBPK model can determine the optimal dosing regimens for various clinical scenarios involving OLA.

Simulation of optimal dose regimens of photoactivated curcumin for antimicrobial resistance pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: A modeling approach

Background

Secondary antimicrobial resistance bacterial (AMR) pneumonia could lead to an increase in mortality in COVID-19 patients, particularly of geriatric patients with underlying diseases. The comedication of current medicines for AMR pneumonia with corticosteroids may lead to suboptimal treatment or toxicities due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs).

Objective

This study aimed to propose new promising dosage regimens of photoactivated curcumin when co-administered with corticosteroids for the treatment of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pneumonia in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) with the simplified lung compartments model was built and verified following standard model verification (absolute average-folding error or AAFEs). The pharmacokinetic properties of photoactivated were assumed to be similar to curcumin due to minor changes in physiochemical properties of compound by photoactivation. The acceptable AAFEs values were within 2-fold. The verified model was used to simulate new regimens for different formulations of photoactivated curcumin.

Results

The AAFEs was 1.12-fold. Original formulation (120 mg once-daily dose) or new intramuscular nano-formulation (100 mg with a release rate of 10/h given every 7 days) is suitable for outpatients with MRSA pneumonia to improve patient adherence. New intravenous formulation (2000 mg twice-daily doses) is for hospitalized patients with both MRSA and VRSA pneumonia.

Conclusion

The PBPK models, in conjunction with MIC and applied physiological changes in COVID-19 patients, is a potential tool to predict optimal dosage regimens of photoactivated curcumin for the treatment of co-infected AMR pneumonia in COVID-19 patients. Each formulation is appropriate for different patient conditions and pathogens.

Prediction for Plasma Trough Concentration and Optimal Dosing of Imatinib under Multiple Clinical Situations Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

(1) Purpose: This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the trough concentration (C _trough) of imatinib (IMA) at steady state in patients and to explore the role of free concentration (f _up), α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) level, and organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) activity/expression in clinical efficacy. (2) Methods: The population PBPK model was built using physicochemical and biochemical properties, metabolizing and transporting kinetics, tissue distribution, and human physiological parameters. (3) Results: The PBPK model successfully predicted the C _trough of IMA administered alone in chronic phase (CP) and accelerated phase (AP) patients, the C _trough of IMA co-administered with six modulators, and C _trough in CP patients with hepatic impairment. Most of the ratios between predicted and observed data are within 0.70-1.30. Additionally, the recommendations for dosing adjustments for IMA have been given under multiple clinical uses. The sensitivity analysis showed that exploring the f _up and AGP level had a significant influence on the plasma C _trough of IMA. Meanwhile, the simulations also revealed that OCT1 activity and expression had a significant impact on the intracellular C _trough of IMA. (4) Conclusion: The current PBPK model can accurately predict the IMA C _trough and provide appropriate dosing adjustment recommendations in a variety of clinical situations.

The investigation of the complex population-drug-drug interaction between ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and chloroquine or ivermectin using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling

OBJECTIVES

Therapy failure caused by complex population-drug-drug (PDDI) interactions including CYP3A4 can be predicted using mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. A synergy between ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPVr), ivermectin, and chloroquine was suggested to improve COVID-19 treatment. This work aimed to study the PDDI of the two CYP3A4 substrates (ivermectin and chloroquine) with LPVr in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adults, geriatrics, and pregnancy populations.

METHODS

The PDDI of LPVr with ivermectin or chloroquine was investigated. Pearson's correlations between plasma, saliva, and lung interstitial fluid (ISF) levels were evaluated. Target site (lung epithelial lining fluid [ELF]) levels of ivermectin and chloroquine were estimated.

RESULTS

Upon LPVr coadministration, while the chloroquine plasma levels were reduced by 30, 40, and 20%, the ivermectin plasma levels were increased by a minimum of 425, 234, and 453% in adults, geriatrics, and pregnancy populations, respectively. The established correlation equations can be useful in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and dosing regimen optimization.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither chloroquine nor ivermectin reached therapeutic ELF levels in the presence of LPVr despite reaching toxic ivermectin plasma levels. PBPK modeling, guided with TDM in saliva, can be advantageous to evaluate the probability of reaching therapeutic ELF levels in the presence of PDDI, especially in home-treated patients.

Prediction for optimal dosage of pazopanib under various clinical situations using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

This study aimed to apply a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict optimal dosing regimens of pazopanib (PAZ) for safe and effective administration when co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, acid-reducing agents, food, and administered in patients with hepatic impairment. Here, we have successfully developed the population PBPK model and the predicted PK variables by this model matched well with the clinically observed data. Most ratios of prediction to observation were between 0.5 and 2.0. Suitable dosage modifications of PAZ have been identified using the PBPK simulations in various situations, i.e., 200 mg once daily (OD) or 100 mg twice daily (BID) when co-administered with the two CYP3A4 inhibitors, 200 mg BID when simultaneously administered with food or 800 mg OD when avoiding food uptake simultaneously. Additionally, the PBPK model also suggested that dosing does not need to be adjusted when co-administered with esomeprazole and administration in patients with wild hepatic impairment. Furthermore, the PBPK model also suggested that PAZ is not recommended to be administered in patients with severe hepatic impairment. In summary, the present PBPK model can determine the optimal dosing adjustment recommendations in multiple clinical uses, which cannot be achieved by only focusing on AUC linear change of PK.

In Silico Prediction of Andrographolide Dosage Regimens for COVID-19 Treatment

Andrographolide (APE) has been used for COVID-19 treatment in various clinical settings in South-East Asia due to its benefits on reduction of viral clearance and prevention of disease progression. However, the limitation of APE clinical use is the high incidence of adverse events. The objective of this study was to find the optimal dosage regimens of APE for COVID-19 treatment. The whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were constructed using data from the published articles and validated against clinical observations. The inhibitory effect of APE was determined for the potency of drug efficacy. For prevention of pneumonia, multiple oral doses such as 120[Formula: see text]mg for three doses, followed by 60[Formula: see text]mg three times daily for 4 consecutive days, or 200[Formula: see text]mg intravenous infusion at the rate of 20 mg/h once daily is advised in patients with mild COVID-19. For prevention of pneumonia and reduction of viral clearance time, the recommended dosage regimen is 500[Formula: see text]mg intravenous infusion at the rate of 25[Formula: see text]mg/h once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. One hundred virtual populations (50 males and 50 females) were simulated for oral and intravenous infusion formulations of APE. The eligible PBPK/PD models successfully predicted optimal dosage regimens and formulations of APE for prevention of disease progression and/or reduction of viral clearance time. Additionally, APE should be co-administered with other antiviral drugs to enhance therapeutic efficacy for COVID-19 treatment.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic combined BTK occupancy modeling for optimal dosing regimen prediction of acalabrutinib in patients alone, with different CYP3A4 variants, co-administered with CYP3A4 modulators and with hepatic impairment

PURPOSE

To develop a mathematical model combined between physiologically based pharmacokinetic and BTK occupancy (PBPK-BO) to simultaneously predict pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) changes of acalabrutinib (ACA) and active metabolite ACP-5862 in healthy humans as well as PD in patients. Next, to use the PBPK-BO to determine the optimal dosing regimens in patients alone, with different CYP3A4 variants, when co-administration with four CYP3A4 modulators and in patients with hepatic impairment, respectively.

METHODS

The PBPK-BO model was built using physicochemical and biochemical properties of ACA and ACP-5862 and then verified by observed PK and PD data from healthy humans and patients. Finally, the model was applied to determine optimal dosing regimens in various clinical situations.

RESULTS

The simulations demonstrated that 100 mg ACA twice daily (BID) was the optimal dosing regimen in patients alone. Additionally, dosage regimens might be reduced to 50 mg BID in patients with five CYP3A4 variants. Moreover, the dosing regimen should be modified to 100 mg (even to 50 mg) once daily (QD) when co-administration with erythromycin or clarithromycin, and be increased to 200 mg BID with rifampicin, and but be avoided co-administration with itraconazole. Furthermore, dosage regimen simulations showed that optimal dosing might be decreased to 50 mg BID in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, and be avoided taking ACA in severely hepatically impaired patients.

CONCLUSION

This PBPK-BO model can predict PK and PD in healthy humans and patients and also predict the optimal dosing regimens in various clinical situations.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of quinine and its relationship with treatment outcomes in children, pregnant women, and elderly patients, with uncomplicated and complicated malaria: a systematic review

Background

Standard dosage regimens of quinine formulated for adult patients with uncomplicated and complicated malaria have been applied for clinical uses in children, pregnant women, and elderly. Since these populations have anatomical and physiological differences from adults, dosage regimens formulated for adults may not be appropriate. The study aimed to (i) review existing information on the pharmacokinetics of quinine in children, pregnant women, and elderly populations, (ii) identify factors that influence quinine pharmacokinetics, and (iii) analyse the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and treatment outcomes (therapeutic and safety) of various dosage regimens of quinine.

Methods

Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed were the databases applied in this systematic search for relevant research articles published up to October 2020 using the predefined search terms. The retrieved articles were initially screened by titles and abstracts to exclude any irrelevant articles and were further evaluated based on full-texts, applying the predefined eligibility criteria. Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft, WA, USA) was used for data collection and management. Qualitative data are presented as numbers and percentages, and where appropriate, mean + SD or median (range) or range values.

Results

Twenty-eight articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 19 in children, 7 in pregnant women, and 2 in elderly (14 and 7 articles in complicated and uncomplicated malaria, respectively). Severity of infection, routes of administration, and nutritional status were shown to be the key factors impacting quinine pharmacokinetics in these vulnerable groups.

Conclusions

The recommended dosages for both uncomplicated and complicated malaria are, in general, adequate for elderly and children with uncomplicated malaria. Dose adjustment may be required in pregnant women with both uncomplicated and complicated malaria, and in children with complicated malaria. Pharmacokinetics studies relevant to clinical efficacy in these vulnerable groups of patients with large sample size and reassessment of MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) should be considered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04065-1.

Drug-Drug Interactions in People Living with HIV at Risk of Hepatic and Renal Impairment: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Despite the advancement of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), drug–drug interactions (DDIs) remain a relevant clinical issue for people living with HIV receiving ART. Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs can be victims and perpetrators of DDIs, and a detailed investigation during drug discovery and development is required to determine whether dose adjustments are necessary or coadministrations are contraindicated. Maintaining therapeutic ARV plasma concentrations is essential for successful ART, and changes resulting from potential DDIs could lead to toxicity, treatment failure, or the emergence of ARV‐resistant HIV. The challenges surrounding DDI management are complex in special populations of people living with HIV, and often lack evidence‐based guidance as a result of their underrepresentation in clinical investigations. Specifically, the prevalence of hepatic and renal impairment in people living with HIV are between five and 10 times greater than in people who are HIV‐negative, with each condition constituting approximately 15% of non‐AIDS‐related mortality. Therapeutic strategies tend to revolve around the treatment of risk factors that lead to hepatic and renal impairment, such as hepatitis C, hepatitis B, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. These strategies result in a diverse range of potential DDIs with ART. The purpose of this review was 2‐fold. First, to summarize current pharmacokinetic DDIs and their mechanisms between ARVs and co‐medications used for the prevention and treatment of hepatic and renal impairment in people living with HIV. Second, to identify existing knowledge gaps surrounding DDIs related to these special populations and suggest areas and techniques to focus upon in future research efforts.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for dose optimization of quinine-phenobarbital coadministration in patients with cerebral malaria

Patients with cerebral malaria with polymorphic Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotypes who receive concurrent treatment with quinine are at risk of inadequate or toxic therapeutic drug concentrations due to metabolic drug interactions. The study aimed to predict the potential dose regimens of quinine when coadministered with phenobarbital in adult patients with cerebral malaria and complications (e.g., lactic acidosis and acute renal failure) and concurrent with seizures and acute renal failure who carry wild‐type and polymorphic CYP2C19. The whole‐body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for quinine, phenobarbital, and quinine–phenobarbital coadministration were constructed based on the previously published information using Simbiology®. Four published articles were used for model validation. A total of 100 virtual patients were simulated based on the 14‐day and 3‐day courses of treatment. using the drug–drug interaction approach. The predicted results were within 15% of the observed values. Standard phenobarbital dose, when administered with quinine, is suitable for all groups with single or continuous seizures regardless of CYP2C19 genotype, renal failure, and lactic acidosis. Dose adjustment based on area under the curve ratio provided inappropriate quinine concentrations. The recommended dose of quinine when coadministered with phenobarbital based on the PBPK model for all groups is a loading dose of 2000 mg intravenous (i.v.) infusion rate 250 mg/h followed by 1200 mg i.v. rate 150 mg/h. The developed PBPK models are credible for further simulations. Because the predicted quinine doses in all groups were similar regardless of the CYP2C19 genotype, genotyping may not be required.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling to Investigate the Impact of the Cytokine Storm on CYP3A Drug Pharmacokinetics in COVID-19 Patients

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) may experience a cytokine storm with elevated interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) levels in response to severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). IL‐6 suppresses hepatic enzymes, including CYP3A; however, the effect on drug exposure and drug‐drug interaction magnitudes of the cytokine storm and resulting elevated IL‐6 levels have not been characterized in patients with COVID‐19. We used physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to simulate the effect of inflammation on the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A metabolized drugs. A PBPK model was developed for lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (LPV/r), using clinically observed data from people living with HIV (PLWH). The inhibition of CYPs by IL‐6 was implemented by a semimechanistic suppression model and verified against clinical data from patients with COVID‐19, treated with LPV/r. Subsequently, the verified model was used to simulate the effect of various clinically observed IL‐6 levels on the exposure of LPV/r and midazolam, a CYP3A model drug. Clinically observed LPV/r concentrations in PLWH and patients with COVID‐19 were predicted within the 95% confidence interval of the simulation results, demonstrating its predictive capability. Simulations indicated a twofold higher LPV exposure in patients with COVID‐19 compared with PLWH, whereas ritonavir exposure was predicted to be comparable. Varying IL‐6 levels under COVID‐19 had only a marginal effect on LPV/r pharmacokinetics according to our model. Simulations showed that a cytokine storm increased the exposure of the CYP3A paradigm substrate midazolam by 40%. Our simulations suggest that CYP3A metabolism is altered in patients with COVID‐19 having increased cytokine release. Caution is required when prescribing narrow therapeutic index drugs particularly in the presence of strong CYP3A inhibitors.